TRK-3 OMNIA is a combination of the non-contact tonometer and pachymeter. The device is indicated for automatic measurement of intraocular pressure without contacting the eye (with less than 3 diopters of corneal astigmatism); and measurement of central corneal thickness.
Device Story
TRK-3 OMNIA is a multi-function ophthalmic device combining auto-refractometer, keratometer, non-contact tonometer, and pachymeter. It measures refractive errors, corneal curvature, IOP, and CCT. For IOP, it uses a non-contact air puff; an electro-optical system monitors corneal deformation, and a pressure sensor detects the force required for applanation. For CCT, it projects slit light onto the cornea; a line sensor captures reflected light from front and back surfaces. Used in clinical settings by eye care professionals. Output is displayed to the clinician to assist in diagnosing and managing ocular conditions like glaucoma. Benefits include non-invasive, automated assessment of key anterior segment parameters.
Clinical Evidence
Prospective clinical studies conducted at a U.S. site. Tonometer function: 120 eyes (40 low, 40 intermediate, 40 high IOP) compared to Goldmann Applanation Tonometer; all eyes within +/- 5.0 mmHg tolerance. Pachymeter function: 90 subjects (30 normal, 30 abnormal, 30 glaucoma) compared to SP-1P; demonstrated high correlation (R² 0.92-0.969) and superior repeatability/reproducibility compared to the predicate. No adverse events reported.
Technological Characteristics
Multi-function ophthalmic device. Sensing: LED-based applanation detection for IOP; slit-light projection with line sensor for CCT. IOP range: 7-60 mmHg. CCT range: 0.400-0.730 mm. Connectivity: Standalone. Standards: ISO 10993-1, IEC 60601-1, IEC 60601-1-2, ISO 8612, ANSI Z80.10-2014.
Indications for Use
Indicated for automatic measurement of intraocular pressure (IOP) and central corneal thickness (CCT) in patients aged 22 years or older. Contraindicated for patients with corneal scarring, corneal surgery (including laser), keratoconus, or corneal astigmatism >3D. IOP measurement is for eyes with <3D corneal astigmatism.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A tonometer and accessories is a manual device intended to measure intraocular pressure by applying a known force on the globe of the eye and measuring the amount of indentation produced (Schiotz type) or to measure intraocular tension by applanation (applying a small flat disk to the cornea). Accessories for the device may include a tonometer calibrator or a tonograph recording system. The device is intended for use in the diagnosis of glaucoma.
{0}
FDA U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION
November 7, 2025
Topcon Corporation
% Lena Sattler
President
Orasi Consulting, LLC.
226 1st Street
Bonita Springs, Florida 34134
Re: K253039
Trade/Device Name: AUTO KERATO-REFRACTO TONOMETER TRK-3 OMNIA
Regulation Number: 21 CFR 886.1930
Regulation Name: Tonometer And Accessories
Regulatory Class: Class II
Product Code: HKX, MXK
Dated: September 22, 2025
Received: September 22, 2025
Dear Lena Sattler:
We have reviewed your section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database available at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Additional information about changes that may require a new premarket notification are provided in the FDA guidance documents entitled "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Change to an Existing Device"
U.S. Food & Drug Administration
10903 New Hampshire Avenue
Silver Spring, MD 20993
www.fda.gov
{1}
K253039 - Lena Sattler
Page 2
(https://www.fda.gov/media/99812/download) and "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Software Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99785/download).
Your device is also subject to, among other requirements, the Quality System (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820), which includes, but is not limited to, 21 CFR 820.30, Design controls; 21 CFR 820.90, Nonconforming product; and 21 CFR 820.100, Corrective and preventive action. Please note that regardless of whether a change requires premarket review, the QS regulation requires device manufacturers to review and approve changes to device design and production (21 CFR 820.30 and 21 CFR 820.70) and document changes and approvals in the device master record (21 CFR 820.181).
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR Part 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reporting-combination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR Parts 1000-1050.
All medical devices, including Class I and unclassified devices and combination product device constituent parts are required to be in compliance with the final Unique Device Identification System rule ("UDI Rule"). The UDI Rule requires, among other things, that a device bear a unique device identifier (UDI) on its label and package (21 CFR 801.20(a)) unless an exception or alternative applies (21 CFR 801.20(b)) and that the dates on the device label be formatted in accordance with 21 CFR 801.18. The UDI Rule (21 CFR 830.300(a) and 830.320(b)) also requires that certain information be submitted to the Global Unique Device Identification Database (GUDID) (21 CFR Part 830 Subpart E). For additional information on these requirements, please see the UDI System webpage at https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance/unique-device-identification-system-udi-system.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reporting-mdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
{2}
K253039 - Lena Sattler
Page 3
For comprehensive regulatory information about medical devices and radiation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
Alexander Beylin -S
Date: 2025.11.07 11:50:07
-05'00'
for Elvin Ng
Assistant Director
DHT1A: Division of Ophthalmic Devices
OHT1: Office of Ophthalmic, Anesthesia, Respiratory, ENT, and Dental Devices
Office of Product Evaluation and Quality
Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{3}
| Indications for Use | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Please type in the marketing application/submission number, if it is known. This textbox will be left blank for original applications/submissions. | K253039 | ? |
| Please provide the device trade name(s). | | ? |
| AUTO KERATO-REFRACTO TONOMETER TRK-3 OMNIA | | |
| Please provide your Indications for Use below. | | ? |
| TRK-3 OMNIA is a combination of the non-contact tonometer and pachymeter. The device is indicated for automatic measurement of intraocular pressure without contacting the eye (with less than 3 diopters of corneal astigmatism); and measurement of central corneal thickness. | | |
| Please select the types of uses (select one or both, as applicable). | ☑ Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
☐ Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C) | ? |
{4}
Traditional 510(k) TRK-3 OMNIA
Topcon Corporation
# 510(k) SUMMARY
Traditional 510(k) K253039
# TOPCON CORPORATION
AUTO KERATO-REFRACTO TONOMETER TRK-3 OMNIA
# GENERAL INFORMATION
Submitter's information:
TOPCON Corporation
75-1 Hasunuma-cho, Itabashi-ku
Tokyo, 174-8580, Japan
Contact person:
Lena Sattler
President, Orasi Consulting, LLC.
226 1st Street
Bonita Springs, FL 34134
Telephone: (440) 554-3706
Facsimile: (866) 904-4315
E-mail: lena@orasiconsulting.com
Date Prepared:
September 22, 2025
# DEVICE INFORMATION
# SUBJECT DEVICE
Name of Device: AUTO KERATO-REFRACTO TONOMETER TRK-3 OMNIA
Classification: Class II
Classification Name: 21 CFR 886.1930 (Tonometer and accessories)
Primary Product Code: HKX (Tonometer, Ac-Powered)
Secondary product Codes: MXK (Device, Analysis, Anterior Segment)
Page 1 of 14
{5}
K253039
# PRIMARY PREDICATE DEVICE
Company: TonoVue Non-Contact Tonometer
Device: Crystalvue Medical Corporation
510(k) No.: K180820
Classification Name: 21 CFR §886.1930 (Tonometer and accessories)
Product Code: HKX (Tonometer, Ac-Powered)
# SECONDARY PREDICATE DEVICE
Company: TOPCON CORPORATION
Device: SP-1P Specular Microscope
510(k) No.: K142417
Classification Name: 21 CFR §886.1850 (AC Powered Slit Lamp Biomicroscope)
Product Code: NQE (Microscope, Specular)
# BRIEF DEVICE DESCRIPTION
TRK-3 OMNIA is a multiple function device, a combination of the auto refractometer, keratometer, non-contact tonometer, and pachymeter. The device is capable of automatic measurement of the refractive errors of the eye; measurement of the corneal curvature of the eye; measurement of intraocular pressure without contacting the eye (with less than 3 diopters of corneal astigmatism); and measurement of central corneal thickness. The device also calculates corneal diameter and pupil distance.
# INTENDED USE / INDICATIONS FOR USE
TRK-3 OMNIA is a combination of the non-contact tonometer and pachymeter. The device is indicated for automatic measurement of intraocular pressure without contacting the eye (with less than 3 diopters of corneal astigmatism); and measurement of central corneal thickness.
# NON-CLINICAL TEST RESULTS
Non-clinical evaluation and testing results according to the following standards and the FDA’s guidance documents were submitted. TRK-3 OMNIA satisfied the requirements.
- ISO 10993-1
- IEC 60601-1-2
- IEC 60601-1
- ISO 8612
- “7. Bench Testing” of the FDA’s guidance document, “Tonometers – Premarket Notification [510(k)] Submissions”
- The FDA’s Guidance document “Content of Premarket Submissions for Device Software Functions” (issued on June 14, 2023)
Traditional 510(k) TRK-3 OMNIA
Topcon Corporation
{6}
K253039
# CLINICAL TEST RESULTS
## 1. Clinical Study for Tonometer Function
A prospective clinical study was conducted, at a U.S. clinical site, to confirm that the tonometer function of the TRK-3 OMNIA conforms to the tonometry standards, ISO 8612:2009 and ANSI Z80.10-2014 (except for the requirement for "highly astigmatic eyes (>3 D of corneal astigmatism)" in B5.3 of Annex B). "8.Clinical Performance" of the FDA guidance document, "Tonometers - Premarket Notification [510(k)] Submissions (issued on March 27, 2006) and the Extent of Recognition in the FDA Supplementary Information Sheet (FR Recognition List Number 040, FR Recognition Number 10-96, Date of Entry 08/14/2015) were also taken into consideration.
The sample size was at least 120 eyes from 120 subjects, including at least 40 eyes in each of the categories of low IOP (7-16 mmHg), intermediate IOP (>16 mmHg to <23 mmHg), and high IOP (>23 mmHg) and at least 2 eyes with IOP of 30 mmHg or higher. Eligibility criteria were defined by tonometer standards, and included participants aged 22 years or older, with the main exclusion criteria being those with corneal scarring, corneal surgery including corneal laser surgery, keratoconus, and central corneal thickness greater than 0.6 mm or less than 0.5 mm, and corneal astigmatism greater than 3D.
A total of 125 subjects were enrolled in the study and 120 subjects completed the study with all valid measurements. Table A shows the demographics.
Traditional 510(k) TRK-3 OMNIA
Topcon Corporation
{7}
K253039
Table A: Demographics
| Parameter | Low IOP
(7 to 16 mmHg)
(N=40) | Intermediate IOP
(>16 to <23)
(N=40) | High IOP
(≥23)
(N=40) | Total
(N=120) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Age (Years) | | | | |
| N | 40 | 40 | 40 | 120 |
| Mean (SD) | 50.9 (14.7) | 56.0 (13.6) | 62.2 (11.2) | 56.4 (13.9) |
| Median | 55 | 57 | 65 | 59 |
| (Min, Max) | (24, 71) | (27, 80) | (25, 85) | (24, 85) |
| Age Range | | | | |
| 22 - 30 years | 15.0% (6/40) | 2.5% (1/40) | 2.5% (1/40) | 6.7% (8/120) |
| 31 - 40 years | 12.5% (5/40) | 12.5% (5/40) | 2.5% (1/40) | 9.2% (11/120) |
| 41 - 50 years | 12.5% (5/40) | 22.5% (9/40) | 2.5% (1/40) | 12.5% (15/120) |
| 51 - 60 years | 25.0% (10/40) | 22.5% (9/40) | 30.0% (12/40) | 25.8% (31/120) |
| 61 - 70 years | 32.5% (13/40) | 20.0% (8/40) | 37.5% (15/40) | 30.0% (36/120) |
| >70 years | 2.5% (1/40) | 20.0% (8/40) | 25.0% (10/40) | 15.8% (19/120) |
| Sex | | | | |
| Male | 45.0% (18/40) | 45.0% (18/40) | 37.5% (15/40) | 42.5% (51/120) |
| Female | 55.0% (22/40) | 55.0% (22/40) | 62.5% (25/40) | 57.5% (69/120) |
| Race | | | | |
| American Indian
Or Alaska Native | 2.5% (1/40) | 7.5% (3/40) | 0.0% (0/40) | 3.3% (4/120) |
| Asian | 10.0% (4/40) | 5.0% (2/40) | 5.0% (2/40) | 6.7% (8/120) |
| Black Or African
American | 7.5% (3/40) | 22.5% (9/40) | 75.0% (30/40) | 35.0% (42/120) |
| Hawaiian Or
Other Pacific
Islander | 5.0% (2/40) | 2.5% (1/40) | 0.0% (0/40) | 2.5% (3/120) |
| White | 75.0% (30/40) | 60.0% (24/40) | 20.0% (8/40) | 51.7% (62/120) |
| Not Disclosed | 0.0% (0/40) | 2.5% (1/40) | 0.0% (0/40) | 0.8% (1/120) |
| Ethnicity | | | | |
| Hispanic Or
Latino | 17.5% (7/40) | 12.5% (5/40) | 2.5% (1/40) | 10.8% (13/120) |
Traditional 510(k) TRK-3 OMNIA
Topcon Corporation
{8}
K253039
Table A: Demographics
| Parameter | Low IOP (7 to 16 mmHg) (N=40) | Intermediate IOP (>16 to <23) (N=40) | High IOP (≥23) (N=40) | Total (N=120) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Not Hispanic Or Latino | 82.5% (33/40) | 85.0% (34/40) | 97.5% (39/40) | 88.3% (106/120) |
| Not Disclosed | 0.0% (0/40) | 2.5% (1/40) | 0.0% (0/40) | 0.8% (1/120) |
| Study Eye | | | | |
| OD | 55.0% (22/40) | 57.5% (23/40) | 40.0% (16/40) | 50.8% (61/120) |
| OS | 45.0% (18/40) | 42.5% (17/40) | 60.0% (24/40) | 49.2% (59/120) |
The IOP between the test tonometer TRK-3 OMNIA and the reference tonometer (Goldmann Applanation Tonometer) in eyes without high corneal astigmatism was compared over the three IOP ranges and there was no study eye with IOP exceeding the tolerance of paired differences $(+/-5.0\mathrm{mmHg})$ in all IOP ranges, as shown in Table B.
Table B: Summary of the tonometer study
| IOP range (mmHg) | | Number of study eyes | Number of eyes within the tolerance of paired differences | Number of eyes outside the acceptable range (%) | | Mean and Standard deviation of differences between TRK-3 and GAT (mmHg) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Low IOP | 7 to 16 | 40 | 40 | 0 | (0.0) | 2.10 (1.68) |
| Intermediate IOP | >16 to <23 | 40 | 40 | 0 | (0.0) | -0.20 (1.40) |
| High IOP | ≥23 | 40 | 40 | 0 | (0.0) | -2.45 (1.81) |
The TRK-3 OMNIA conforms to all the requirements of ISO 8612:2009 and ANSI Z80.10-2014 (except for the requirement for "highly astigmatic eyes ( $>3$ D of corneal astigmatism)" in B5.3 of Annex B). For the safety evaluation, no subjects experienced adverse events in this study.
Traditional
510(\mathrm{k})
TRK-3 OMNIA
Topcon Corporation
{9}
K253039
## 2. Clinical Study for Pachymeter Function
Topcon conducted a prospective comparative clinical study, at a U.S. clinical site, to compare the agreement and precision of the pachymeter function between TRK-3 OMNIA and SP-1P Specular Microscope (K142417). Participants age 22 years or older were enrolled and assigned to one of three groups: 1) “Normal Cornea”, 2) “Abnormal Cornea”, and 3) “Glaucoma”. The sample size was 30 eyes of 30 subjects for each group. Key enrollment criteria for 2) were to include at least one eye with corneal abnormality, to include (but not limited to) corneal transplants, abnormal corneal shape, long term (>3 years) daily contact lens use, post keratorefractive surgery and dry eye. Key enrollment criteria for 3) were to include eyes with visual field detect(s) consistent with glaucomatous optic nerve damage.
A total of 108 subjects were consented and 105 subjects were enrolled in the study; 90 subjects completed the study with valid pachymetry readings (central corneal thickness, CCT, in micron), 30 subjects in each study group. Table C shows the demographics.
Table C: Demographics
| | Normal Cornea | Abnormal Cornea | Glaucoma |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | Total | Total | Total |
| | (N=30) | (N=30) | (N=30) |
| Age (years) | | | |
| N | 30 | 30 | 30 |
| Mean(SD) | 40.0 (14.8) | 44.2 (17.6) | 64.9 (8.9) |
| Min, Max | 24, 69 | 24, 82 | 45, 82 |
| Median | 36.5 | 40 | 66 |
| | | | |
| Age Range | | | |
| 22 - 30 years | 12 (40.00%) | 9 (30.00%) | 0 (0.00%) |
| 31 - 40 years | 4 (13.33%) | 6 (20.00%) | 0 (0.00%) |
| 41 - 50 years | 6 (20.00%) | 5 (16.67%) | 3 (10.00%) |
| 51 - 60 years | 4 (13.33%) | 3 (10.00%) | 6 (20.00%) |
| 61 - 70 years | 4 (13.33%) | 4 (13.33%) | 14 (46.67%) |
| >70 years | 0 (0.00%) | 3 (10.00%) | 7 (23.33%) |
| | | | |
Traditional 510(k) TRK-3 OMNIA
Topcon Corporation
Page 6 of 14
{10}
K253039
| | Normal Cornea | Abnormal Cornea | Glaucoma |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | Total | Total | Total |
| | (N=30) | (N=30) | (N=30) |
| Sex | | | |
| Male | 8 (26.67%) | 4 (13.33%) | 14 (46.67%) |
| Female | 22 (73.33%) | 26 (86.67%) | 16 (53.33%) |
| | | | |
| Race | | | |
| Asian | 5 (16.67%) | 6 (20.00%) | 1 (3.33%) |
| Black or African American | 3 (10.00%) | 10 (33.33%) | 25 (83.33%) |
| Not Disclosed | 1 (3.33%) | 0 (0.00%) | 1 (3.33%) |
| White | 20 (66.67%) | 12 (40.00%) | 3 (10.00%) |
| White, Asian | 1 (3.33%) | 2 (6.67%) | 0 (0.00%) |
| | | | |
| Ethnicity | | | |
| Hispanic or Latino | 7 (23.33%) | 2 (6.67%) | 3 (10.00%) |
| Not Disclosed | 0 (0.00%) | 0 (0.00%) | 1 (3.33%) |
| Not Hispanic or Latino | 23 (76.67%) | 28 (93.33%) | 26 (86.67%) |
Of the abnormal cornea eyes tested in this study, all 30 had clinically significant slit lamp cornea findings. 3 (10.0%) had corneal transplants, 6 (20.0%) had various abnormal corneal shapes including 2 (6.7%) scarring, 10 (33.3%) had long term daily contact lens use, 8 (26.6%) had a form of post keratorefractive surgery, and 1 (3.3%) had corneal ring. All 30 eyes were CXL, 7 (23.3%) had dry eye, 1 (3.3%) had opacity, 1 (3.3%) had Guttata, and 1 (3.3%) had Pterygium.
Traditional 510(k) TRK-3 OMNIA
Topcon Corporation
{11}
K253039
Agreement between TRK-3 OMNIA and SP-1P was evaluated by the mean difference and corresponding standard deviation, the $95\%$ LOA, Bland-Altman plots, and the Deming regression for each subject population. A summary of the agreement study is provided in Table D.
Table D: Summary of agreement of CCT between TRK-3 OMNIA and SP-1P
| TRK-3 OMNIA Mean (SD) | SP-1P Mean (SD) | Mean Difference (SD) | 95% Limits of Agreement | Correlation (R²) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Normal Cornea (N=30) | | | | |
| 533.7 (34.68) | 533.6 (34.35) | 0.1 (6.12) | (-11.9, 12.1) | 0.969 |
| Abnormal Cornea (N=30) | | | | |
| 512.8 (50.17) | 516.7 (46.64) | -4 (9.32) | (-22.2, 14.3) | 0.969 |
| Glaucoma (N=30) | | | | |
| 500.4 (24.18) | 501.2 (23.05) | -0.8 (6.82) | (-14.2, 12.6) | 0.92 |
Traditional
510(\mathrm{k})
TRK-3 OMNIA
Topcon Corporation
{12}
K253039
The analysis of precision used a two-way random-effect ANOVA model to estimate the repeatability and reproducibility limits, and coefficient of variation of CCT by subject population and study device. A summary of the precision study is provided in Table E.
Table E: Summary of precision of CCT between TRK-3 OMNIA and SP-1P
| | CCT | TRK-3 OMNIA | SP-1P |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Normal Cornea (N=30) | Overall Mean | 533.5 | 533.5 |
| | Repeatability SD | 2.405 | 7.402 |
| | Repeatability SD as % of the Mean | 0.45% | 1.39% |
| | Repeatability Limit | 6.735 | 20.726 |
| | Repeatability Ratio | 0.325 (2.405 / 7.402) | |
| | Reproducibility SD | 3.318 | 7.69 |
| | Reproducibility SD as % of the Mean | 0.62% | 1.44% |
| | Reproducibility Limit | 9.291 | 21.533 |
| | Reproducibility Ratio | 0.431 (3.318 / 7.690) | |
| Abnormal Cornea (N=30) | Overall Mean | 513.7 | 515.7 |
| | Repeatability SD | 2.83 | 10.799 |
| | Repeatability SD as % of the Mean | 0.55% | 2.09% |
| | Repeatability Limit | 7.925 | 30.236 |
| | Repeatability Ratio | 0.262 (2.830 / 10.799) | |
| | Reproducibility SD | 3.762 | 10.826 |
| | Reproducibility SD as % of the Mean | 0.73% | 2.10% |
| | Reproducibility Limit | 10.533 | 30.313 |
| | Reproducibility Ratio | 0.347 (3.762 / 10.826) | |
| Glaucoma (N=30) | Overall Mean | 499 | 501 |
| | Repeatability SD | 3.384 | 4.895 |
| | Repeatability SD as % of the Mean | 0.68% | 0.98% |
| | Repeatability Limit | 9.475 | 13.705 |
Traditional 510(k) TRK-3 OMNIA
Topcon Corporation
{13}
K253039
| | CCT | TRK-3 OMNIA | SP-1P |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | Repeatability Ratio | 0.691
(3.384 / 4.895) | |
| | Reproducibility SD | 4.411 | 4.937 |
| | Reproducibility SD as % of the Mean | 0.88% | 0.99% |
| | Reproducibility Limit | 12.351 | 13.825 |
| | Reproducibility Ratio | 0.893
(4.411 / 4.937) | |
As shown in the table above, the repeatability SD and reproducibility SD of TRK-3 for all three groups are less than those of SP-1P (both the repeatability ratio and reproducibility ratio are less than 1), indicating that the variability of TRK-3 is less than that of SP-1P.
The overall results of agreement and precision analysis support the substantial equivalence of TRK-3 OMNIA to SP-1P. For the safety evaluation, no subjects experienced adverse events in this study.
## SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE
The subject device, the TRK-3 OMNIA, is substantially equivalent to the predicate devices because the intended use/indications for use, operation principle and technological characteristics of the TRK-3 OMNIA are similar or equivalent to those of the predicate devices as shown in Table F and Table G in the following pages.
The TRK-3 OMNIA has functions subject to FDA premarket review (the non-contact tonometer, and pachymeter functions) as well as functions that are not subject to FDA premarket review (the refractometer, keratometer functions). For the functions that are not subject to FDA premarket review (the refractometer, keratometer functions), FDA assessed those functions only to the extent that they either could adversely impact the safety and effectiveness of the functions subject to FDA premarket review or they are included as a labeled positive impact that was considered in the assessment of the functions subject to FDA premarket review.
Traditional 510(k) TRK-3 OMNIA
Topcon Corporation
{14}
K253039
Table F: Substantial Equivalence – TRK-3 OMNIA and TonoVue for Tonometry
| Model Number | TRK-3 OMNIA
(Subject device) | TonoVue
(Predicate device) | Substantial Equivalence Discussion |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Trade Name | AUTO KERATO-REFRACTO-TONOMETER
TRK-3 OMNIA | TonoVue Non-Contact
Tonometer | N/A |
| 510(k) submitter/hol der | TOPCON Corporation | Crystalvue Medical Corporation | N/A |
| 510(k) Number | N/A | K180820 | N/A |
| Product code | HKX (Tonometer, Ac-Powered)
MXK (Device, Analysis, Anterior Segment) | HKX (Tonometer, Ac-Powered) | Equivalent |
| Regulation No. | 21 CFR 886.1930 (Tonometer and accessories)
21 CFR 886.1850 (AC-Powered Slitlamp Biomicroscope) | 21 CFR 886.1930 (Tonometer and accessories) | Equivalent |
| Product class | II | II | Equivalent |
| Intended Use /Indications for Use | TRK-3 OMNIA is a combination of the non-contact tonometer and pachymeter. The device is indicated for automatic measurement of intraocular pressure without contacting the eye (with less than 3 diopters of corneal astigmatism); and measurement of central corneal thickness. | The TonoVue is a non-contact tonometer that intended to measure the intra-ocular pressure of the eye in patients with less than 3 diopters of corneal astigmatism. | Equivalent |
| Operating principle | The light source (LED) for applanation detection incorporated in the measuring head emits luminous flux for applanation detection and project it onto the cornea. The measuring nozzle of the intraocular pressure measuring window blows air onto the cornea. The applanation sensor incorporated in the measuring head detects that a certain area of the cornea becomes planar by the air. Then, the pressure sensor incorporated in the measuring head detects the amount of pressure required to flatten the certain area of the cornea. The instrument software installed in the measuring head performs arithmetic processing based on the detected amount of | TonoVue Tonometer is designed to non-contact tonometer (NCT) that measures the intraocular pressure (IOP) by delivering a soft air puff without contacting eyes directly.
TonoVue utilizes a rapid air puff to apply force for flattening the cornea of human eye, and an advanced electro-optical system to monitor its deformation.
The puff force increases until the cornea is applanated over the predetermined area and detected by the pressure sensor inside TonoVue, and the IOP can be calculated. | Equivalent |
Traditional 510(k) TRK-3 OMNIA
Topcon Corporation
Page 11 of 14
{15}
K253039
| Model Number | TRK-3 OMNIA
(Subject device) | TonoVue
(Predicate device) | Substantial
Equivalence Discussion |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | pressure and calculates the intraocular pressure value. | | |
| Technological Characteristics | Measuring range of intraocular pressure:
7 mmHg to 60 mmHg | Measuring range of intraocular pressure:
1–60 mmHg | Similar |
| Conformity Standards | • ISO 10993-1
• IEC 60601-1-2
• IEC 60601-1
• ISO 8612
• “Bench Testing” of the FDA’s guidance document, “Tonometers - Premarket Notification [510(k)] Submissions” | • ISO 10993-1
• IEC 60601-1-2
• IEC 60601-1
• ISO 8612
• “Bench Testing” of the FDA’s guidance document, “Tonometers - Premarket Notification [510(k)] Submissions” | Equivalent |
Traditional 510(k) TRK-3 OMNIA
Topcon Corporation
{16}
K253039
Table G: Substantial Equivalence – TRK-3 OMNIA and SP-1P for Pachymetry
| Model Number | TRK-3 OMNIA
(Subject device) | SP-1P
(Predicate device) | Substantial Equivalence
Discussion |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Trade Name | AUTO KERATO-REFRACTO-TONOMETER
TRK-3 OMNIA | SP-1P Specular Microscope | N/A |
| 510(k) submitter/holder | TOPCON Corporation | TOPCON Corporation | Same |
| 510(k) Number | N/A | K142417 | N/A |
| Product code | HKX (Tonometer, Ac-Powered)
MXK (Device, Analysis, Anterior Segment) | NQE (Microscope, Specular) | Similar |
| Regulation No. | 21 CFR 886.1930 (Tonometer and accessories)
21 CFR 886.1850 (AC-Powered Slitlamp Biomicroscope) | 21 CFR 886.1850 (AC-Powered Slitlamp Biomicroscope) | Equivalent |
| Product class | II | II | Equivalent |
| Intended Use /Indications for Use | TRK-3 OMNIA is a combination of the non-contact tonometer and pachymeter. The device is indicated for automatic measurement of intraocular pressure without contacting the eye (with less than 3 diopters of corneal astigmatism); and measurement of central corneal thickness. | The Specular Microscope SP-1P is a non-contact ophthalmic microscope, optical pachymeter, and camera intended for examination of corneal endothelium and for measurement of the thickness of the cornea. | Equivalent |
| Operating principle | The light source (LED) for pachymetry measurement incorporated in the measuring head emits slit light and projects it onto the cornea obliquely. The line sensor incorporated in the measuring head receives the reflected lights from the front and back surfaces of the cornea. The instrument software installed in the measuring head performs arithmetic processing based on the received lights and calculates the central corneal thickness. | The slit light is projected onto the patient eye at a slant. The corneal thickness is measured by processing reflected light from the corneal surface and back, which is received by line sensor that is optically installed in a diagonal. | Equivalent |
Traditional 510(k) TRK-3 OMNIA
Topcon Corporation
{17}
K253039
| Model Number | TRK-3 OMNIA
(Subject device) | SP-1P
(Predicate device) | Substantial Equivalence
Discussion |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Technological
Characteristics | Measuring range of the corneal
thickness
0.400 mm to 0.730 mm | Measuring range of the corneal
thickness
0.400-0.750mm | Similar |
# CONCLUSION
The results of the non-clinical tests and clinical tests demonstrate that TRK-3 OMNIA is as safe, as effective, and performs as well as the legally marketed devices, and that TRK-3 OMNIA is substantially equivalent to the predicate devices.
Traditional 510(k) TRK-3 OMNIA
Topcon Corporation
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.