K252913 · Sonomotion, Inc. · LNS · Jan 12, 2026 · Gastroenterology, Urology
Device Facts
Record ID
K252913
Device Name
Break Wave
Applicant
Sonomotion, Inc.
Product Code
LNS · Gastroenterology, Urology
Decision Date
Jan 12, 2026
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 876.5990
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic
Indications for Use
The Break Wave device is intended to fragment urinary stones in the kidney (renal pelvis and renal calyces) and ureter (upper and lower ureter).
Device Story
Portable extracorporeal shock wave lithotripter; uses diagnostic ultrasound imaging workstation, imaging probe, high voltage generator, and piezoelectric therapy probe. Operator scans abdomen to locate stone; aligns coaxial imaging/therapy probes; applies coupling gel; places probe against skin (hand-held or mechanical arm). Therapy probe delivers focused acoustic pulses to fragment stones; operator monitors fragmentation in real-time via ultrasound. Used in clinic/office setting without sedation. Output: acoustic energy for stone fragmentation. Benefits: non-invasive stone treatment, no anesthesia required, portable form factor.
Clinical Evidence
Prospective, open-label, single-arm study (n=64) in U.S. and Canada. Subjects (≥18 years) with upper urinary tract stones (4-10 mm). Primary endpoints: safety and effectiveness non-inferiority vs. standard SWL. Results: 70% cumulative success rate; 30% success in lower pole; 38% success in stones >1000 HU. No device-related sepsis, cardiac arrhythmia, or significant hematoma. 96% of AEs were mild/moderate; 84% resolved within one week. Procedures performed without sedation.
Technological Characteristics
Piezoelectric acoustic source; high voltage generator; coaxial ultrasound imaging/therapy probe assembly. Portable form factor. Direct skin coupling (no water membrane). Standards: IEC 60601-1 (electrical safety), IEC 60601-1-2 (EMC), IEC 61846/60601-2-36 (SWL), ISO 10993-1 (biocompatibility), IEC 62366 (usability), ANSI AAMI ST98:2022 (reprocessing).
Indications for Use
Indicated for fragmentation of urinary stones in the kidney (renal pelvis and renal calyces) and ureter (upper and lower ureter) in patients 18 years of age and older with stones >4 mm and ≤10 mm.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
An extracorporeal shock wave lithotripter is a device that focuses ultrasonic shock waves into the body to noninvasively fragment urinary calculi within the kidney or ureter. The primary components of the device are a shock wave generator, high voltage generator, control console, imaging/localization system, and patient table. Prior to treatment, the urinary stone is targeted using either an integral or stand-alone localization/imaging system. Shock waves are typically generated using electrostatic spark discharge (spark gap), electromagnetically repelled membranes, or piezoelectric crystal arrays, and focused onto the stone with either a specially designed reflector, dish, or acoustic lens. The shock waves are created under water within the shock wave generator, and are transferred to the patient's body using an appropriate acoustic interface. After the stone has been fragmented by the focused shock waves, the fragments pass out of the body with the patient's urine.
Special Controls
*Classification.* Class II (special controls) (FDA guidance document: “Guidance for the Content of Premarket Notifications (510(k)'s) for Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripters Indicated for the Fragmentation of Kidney and Ureteral Calculi.”)
{0}
FDA U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION
January 12, 2026
SonoMotion Inc.
Emily Hergenreiter
VP - Clinical Affairs
1600 W Hillsdale Blvd
Suite 105
San Mateo, California 94402
Re: K252913
Trade/Device Name: Break Wave
Regulation Number: 21 CFR 876.5990
Regulation Name: Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripter
Regulatory Class: II
Product Code: LNS
Dated: December 8, 2025
Received: December 9, 2025
Dear Emily Hergenreiter:
We have reviewed your section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database available at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Additional information about changes that may require a new premarket notification are provided in the FDA guidance documents entitled "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Change to an Existing Device"
U.S. Food & Drug Administration
10903 New Hampshire Avenue
Silver Spring, MD 20993
www.fda.gov
{1}
K252913 - Emily Hergenreter
Page 2
(https://www.fda.gov/media/99812/download) and "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Software Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99785/download).
Your device is also subject to, among other requirements, the Quality System (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820), which includes, but is not limited to, 21 CFR 820.30, Design controls; 21 CFR 820.90, Nonconforming product; and 21 CFR 820.100, Corrective and preventive action. Please note that regardless of whether a change requires premarket review, the QS regulation requires device manufacturers to review and approve changes to device design and production (21 CFR 820.30 and 21 CFR 820.70) and document changes and approvals in the device master record (21 CFR 820.181).
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR Part 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reporting-combination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR Parts 1000-1050.
All medical devices, including Class I and unclassified devices and combination product device constituent parts are required to be in compliance with the final Unique Device Identification System rule ("UDI Rule"). The UDI Rule requires, among other things, that a device bear a unique device identifier (UDI) on its label and package (21 CFR 801.20(a)) unless an exception or alternative applies (21 CFR 801.20(b)) and that the dates on the device label be formatted in accordance with 21 CFR 801.18. The UDI Rule (21 CFR 830.300(a) and 830.320(b)) also requires that certain information be submitted to the Global Unique Device Identification Database (GUDID) (21 CFR Part 830 Subpart E). For additional information on these requirements, please see the UDI System webpage at https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance/unique-device-identification-system-udi-system.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reporting-mdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about medical devices and radiation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See
{2}
K252913 - Emily Hergenreter
Page 3
the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
Mark R. Kreitz -S
for Mark J. Antonino, M.S.
Assistant Director
DHT3B: Division of Reproductive, Gynecology, and Urology Devices
OHT3: Office of Gastrorenal, ObGyn, General Hospital, and Urology Devices
Office of Product Evaluation and Quality
Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{3}
FORM FDA 3881 (8/23)
Page 1 of 1
PSC Publishing Services (301) 443-6740
EF
| DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Food and Drug Administration Indications for Use | Form Approved: OMB No. 0910-0120 Expiration Date: 07/31/2026 See PRA Statement below. |
| --- | --- |
| 510(k) Number (if known) K252913 | |
| Device Name Break Wave | |
| Indications for Use (Describe) The Break Wave device is intended to fragment urinary stones in the kidney (renal pelvis and renal calyces) and ureter (upper and lower ureter). | |
| Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable) ☑ Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) ☐ Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C) | |
| CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED. | |
| This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.* | |
| The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to: Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov | |
| "An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number." | |
{4}
K252913
Page 1 of 4
Break Wave 510(k) Premarket Notification
Property of SonoMotion, Inc.
# 510(K) SUMMARY
## 1. SUBMITTER INFORMATION
| Applicant Name: | SonoMotion, Inc. |
| --- | --- |
| Applicant Address: | 1600 W Hillsdale Blvd
Suite 105
San Mateo, CA 94402 |
| Primary Correspondent: | Emily Hergenreter, VP – Clinical Affairs SonoMotion
925-594-9600
emily.hergenreter@sonomotion.com |
| Secondary Correspondent: | Oren Levy, CEO SonoMotion
415-672-2631
oren.levy@sonomotion.com |
| Date Prepared | September 11, 2025 |
## 2. DEVICE INFORMATION
| Proprietary Trade Name: | Break Wave |
| --- | --- |
| Common Name: | Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripter |
| Classification Name: | Lithotripter, Extracorporeal Shock-Wave, Urological |
| Product Code: | LNS |
| Regulatory Class: | Class II |
| Regulation Number: | 21 CFR 876.5990 |
| Panel: | Gastroenterology/Urology |
## 3. PREDICATE DEVICE
The Break Wave device is substantially equivalent to the Piezolith 3000 Triple-focus extracorporeal lithotripter (K072538, Product Code: LNS).
## 4. DEVICE DESCRIPTION
The Break Wave device is designed for the extracorporeal fragmentation of calculi located in the kidney and ureter. The primary components include a diagnostic ultrasound imaging workstation, imaging probe(s), high voltage signal generator, and piezoelectric acoustic source (therapy probe).
The generator controls and drives the therapy probe, which delivers the acoustic pulses required for breaking stones. A lens is used to focus the acoustic waves to the target stone,
510(k) Summary
Page 1 of 4
{5}
K252913
Page 2 of 4
Break Wave 510(k) Premarket Notification
Property of SonoMotion, Inc.
creating stresses within the stone that result in stone fracture. Repeated application of the acoustic waves breaks the stone into small fragments that can pass spontaneously.
The imaging workstation and associated ultrasound imaging probe provide the user interface and real-time image guidance for the Break Wave procedure. The imaging and therapy probe are coaxially aligned, with the imaging probe docking into the housing of the therapy probe. The probe assembly is designed to couple directly to the patient's skin and be held in place with a mechanical arm or hand-held. Since the therapy probe has a fixed focus, multiple therapy probes are included to target stones over a range of skin-to-stone distances.
The Break Wave device is a portable lithotripter the size of a diagnostic ultrasound system, and the user operates the device similarly to operating a diagnostic ultrasound system. The user applies ultrasound coupling gel to the therapy/imaging probes, places the probe assembly against the patient's skin, and scans the abdomen to locate the stone(s) using standard ultrasound imaging techniques. Once the stone is identified and positioned within the target zone, the operator presses and releases the foot pedal to activate therapy. The operator monitors the fragmentation of the stone in real-time via the coaxial aligned imaging probe. The operator has the option to stop the therapy at any time by pressing and releasing the foot pedal a second time. Treatment may continue with up to 30 minutes of therapy. The device can be used without the need for patient sedation.
## 5. INTENDED USE/INDICATIONS FOR USE
The Break Wave device is intended to fragment urinary stones in the kidney (renal pelvis and renal calyces) and ureter (upper and lower ureter).
The Indication for Use for the Break Wave device is the same as the predicate device.
## 6. TECHNOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS COMPARISON
The SonoMotion Break Wave device has similar technological characteristics as the predicate device. The differences between the Break Wave and predicate device do not introduce new or different questions of safety or effectiveness.
### Similar Technological Characteristics
The Break Wave device maintains the following similar technological characteristics as the predicate device:
- Function: focus acoustic waves into the body to non-invasively fragment urinary calculi.
- Primary system components: high voltage generator, acoustic wave source, control console, and imaging/localization system.
- Acoustic wave source: piezoelectric
- Imaging/localization system: continuous, in-line ultrasound
510(k) Summary
Page 2 of 4
{6}
K252913
Page 3 of 4
Break Wave 510(k) Premarket Notification
Property of SonoMotion, Inc.
- Device configuration: transportable
## Technological Differences
The Break Wave device achieves the same function as the predicate device with the following technological differences:
- Lower amplitude, longer duration acoustic wave pulse
- Higher acoustic pulse rate
- Smaller therapy probe head that uses an acoustic lens for focusing
- Therapy probe head that can be hand-held or fixated using a mechanical arm
- Direct coupling of the probe head to the patient’s skin without a water filled membrane
- Does not require an integrated system table or water circulation system
## 7. PERFORMANCE DATA
### Non-Clinical Performance Data
The following safety and performance requirements for medical devices and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy devices were met in support of this premarket notification. Testing is consistent with the predicate device and supports substantial equivalence.
- Basic Safety and Essential Performance, Electrical Safety, and EMC
- IEC 60601-1
- IEC 60601-1-2
- Reprocessing
- ANSI AAMI ST98:2022
- SWL Special Controls
- IEC 61846
- IEC 60601-2-36
- Biocompatibility
- ISO 10993-1
- Usability
- IEC 62366
- Software Verification and Validation Testing
- IEC 62304
Additional verification and validation testing was performed to ensure the device met all its design specifications.
510(k) Summary
Page 3 of 4
{7}
K252913
Page 4 of 4
Break Wave 510(k) Premarket Notification
Property of SonoMotion, Inc.
## Clinical Performance Data
The Break Wave device was evaluated in a prospective, open-label, single-arm clinical investigation of safety and effectiveness involving 64 subjects. The study was conducted across 10 sites including 7 sites in the U.S. and 3 sites in Canada with over 70% of the subjects enrolled from the U.S. sites. The study included participants 18 years of age and older with a stone in the upper urinary tract that was larger than 4 mm and up to and including 10 mm. Safety events were evaluated through direct contact with the subject at 14 ± 4 days post-procedure and through review of the subject’s medical records 90 days post-procedure. Effectiveness was evaluated by post-procedure CT or KUB imaging at 10 ± 2 weeks post-procedure. Subjects could undergo a maximum of one retreatment if a fragment larger than 4 mm and associated with the original stone target was identified on post-index procedure imaging. Study success was based on satisfying two (2) co-primary non-inferiority endpoints for safety and effectiveness compared to current SWL outcomes.
Both the primary effectiveness and safety endpoints were met. The Break Wave device achieved a 70% cumulative success rate for the fragmentation of upper urinary tract stones with 30% of stones in the lower pole and 38% of stones with Hounsfield units greater than 1000. No device- or procedure-related clinically significant hematoma, urinary tract sepsis, or cardiac arrhythmia events were reported. Ninety-six percent of adverse events were mild (83%) or moderate (13%) and consistent with those anticipated with shock wave lithotripsy devices. Only one procedure related serious adverse event was reported, which was consistent with known lithotripsy risks and was managed per standard of care. Eighty-four percent (84%) of adverse events resolved within the first week post-procedure. Procedures were performed without sedation or general anesthesia in all cases; all subjects were awake and responsive during the procedure. This study demonstrates that the different technological characteristics of the Break Wave device do not introduce new questions of safety or effectiveness.
## 8. CONCLUSION
The Break Wave device meets the FDA requirements stated in “Guidance for the Content of Premarket Notifications 510(k)s for Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripters Indicated for the Fragmentation of Kidney and Ureteral Calculi” (issued on Aug. 9, 2000) for substantial equivalence. The Break Wave device has the same intended use and many similar characteristics as the predicate device. The non-clinical and clinical data provided in support of this premarket notification demonstrate that the minor technological differences do not raise any new or different questions of safety and effectiveness and the Break Wave device is therefore substantially equivalent to the predicate device.
510(k) Summary
Page 4 of 4
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.