K252884 · Varian Medical Systems · JAQ · Nov 19, 2025 · Radiology
Device Facts
Record ID
K252884
Device Name
Guided Aarhus Applicator Set
Applicant
Varian Medical Systems
Product Code
JAQ · Radiology
Decision Date
Nov 19, 2025
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 892.5700
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic
Indications for Use
The Guided Aarhus Applicator Set is intended for use when performing HDR brachytherapy within a CT or MRI environment.
Device Story
Guided Aarhus Applicator Set is an intracavitary/interstitial brachytherapy applicator; guides radioactive sources to predefined locations within tumors or treatment areas based on treatment plans. Used in brachytherapy treatment rooms by clinicians; facilitates HDR radiotherapy for cancers of the vagina, vaginal stump, cervix, uterus, and endometrium. Device components include vaginal templates (28mm, 32mm, 36mm ring diameters), needle collectors, and guide tube collectors. Operates in conjunction with compatible afterloaders (GammaMedplus, BRAVOS). Non-metallic, non-magnetic construction ensures MR-safety/conditional compatibility. Benefits patients by enabling precise, image-guided radiation delivery to target tissues.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical data. Performance supported by bench testing, including mechanical verification (push/pull force, drop testing), biocompatibility (ISO 10993), sterilization validation, and human factors validation (IEC 62366) demonstrating safe and effective task completion by intended users.
Indicated for cancer treatment of the vagina, vaginal stump, cervix, uterus, and endometrium using HDR brachytherapy.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A remote controlled radionuclide applicator system is an electromechanical or pneumatic device intended to enable an operator to apply, by remote control, a radionuclide source into the body or to the surface of the body for radiation therapy. This generic type of device may include patient and equipment supports, component parts, treatment planning computer programs, and accessories.
{0}
FDA U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION
November 19, 2025
Varian Medical Systems
Lynn Allman
Sr. Director Regulatory Affairs
3100 Hansen Way
Palo Alto, California 64304
Re: K252884
Trade/Device Name: Guided Aarhus Applicator Set
Regulation Number: 21 CFR 892.5700
Regulation Name: Remote Controlled Radionuclide Applicator System
Regulatory Class: Class II
Product Code: JAQ
Dated: September 9, 2025
Received: September 10, 2025
Dear Lynn Allman:
We have reviewed your section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database available at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
U.S. Food & Drug Administration
10903 New Hampshire Avenue
Silver Spring, MD 20993
www.fda.gov
{1}
K252884 - Lynn Allman
Page 2
Additional information about changes that may require a new premarket notification are provided in the FDA guidance documents entitled "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99812/download) and "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Software Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99785/download).
Your device is also subject to, among other requirements, the Quality System (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820), which includes, but is not limited to, 21 CFR 820.30, Design controls; 21 CFR 820.90, Nonconforming product; and 21 CFR 820.100, Corrective and preventive action. Please note that regardless of whether a change requires premarket review, the QS regulation requires device manufacturers to review and approve changes to device design and production (21 CFR 820.30 and 21 CFR 820.70) and document changes and approvals in the device master record (21 CFR 820.181).
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR Part 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reporting-combination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR Parts 1000-1050.
All medical devices, including Class I and unclassified devices and combination product device constituent parts are required to be in compliance with the final Unique Device Identification System rule ("UDI Rule"). The UDI Rule requires, among other things, that a device bear a unique device identifier (UDI) on its label and package (21 CFR 801.20(a)) unless an exception or alternative applies (21 CFR 801.20(b)) and that the dates on the device label be formatted in accordance with 21 CFR 801.18. The UDI Rule (21 CFR 830.300(a) and 830.320(b)) also requires that certain information be submitted to the Global Unique Device Identification Database (GUDID) (21 CFR Part 830 Subpart E). For additional information on these requirements, please see the UDI System webpage at https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance/unique-device-identification-system-udi-system.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reporting-mdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about medical devices and radiation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-
{2}
K252884 - Lynn Allman
Page 3
assistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,

Lora D. Weidner, Ph.D.
Assistant Director
Radiation Therapy Team
DHT8C: Division of Radiological
Imaging and Radiation Therapy Devices
OHT8: Office of Radiological Health
Office of Product Evaluation and Quality
Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{3}
FORM FDA 3881 (6/20)
Page 1 of 1
PSC Publishing Services (301) 443-6740
EF
| DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Food and Drug Administration Indications for Use | Form Approved: OMB No. 0910-0120 Expiration Date: 06/30/2023 See PRA Statement below. |
| --- | --- |
| 510(k) Number (if known) K252884 | |
| Device Name Guided Aarhus Applicator Set | |
| Indications for Use (Describe) The Guided Aarhus Applicator Set is indicated for use for cancer treatment of the vagina, vaginal stump, cervix, uterus, and endometrium using HDR brachytherapy. | |
| Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable) ☑ Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) ☐ Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C) | |
| CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED. | |
| This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.* | |
| The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to: Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov | |
| "An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number." | |
{4}
K252884
varian
A Siemens Healthineers Company
# Premarket Notification - 510(k) Summary
Traditional 510(k) Submission for Guided Aarhus Applicator Set.
I. Submitter's Name
Varian Medical Systems
3100 Hansen Way
Palo Alto, CA 94304
Contact Name: Lynn, Allman, PhD., Senior Director Regulatory Affairs
Phone: (650) 424-5369
E-mail: submissions.support@varian.com
Date Prepared: November 7, 2025
II. Device Information
Proprietary Name: Guided Aarhus Applicator Set
Classification Name: Remote controlled radionuclide applicator system
Regulation Number: §892.5700
Product Code: JAQ
III. Predicate Device
Aarhus Applicator Set (K222775)
The Aarhus Applicator Set is intended for use when performing HDR or PDR brachytherapy within a CT or MRI environment.
The Aarhus Applicator Set is indicated for cancer treatment of the vagina, cervix, and uterus using HDR or PDR brachytherapy within a hospital CT or MRI environment.
IV. Device Description
The Guided Aarhus Applicator Set is an applicator for intracavitary/interstitial brachytherapy.
Brachytherapy is a form of radiotherapy using Gamma rays from a radioactive source placed at locations close to or within a tumor or other treatment area to a predefined treatment plan. The treatment plan defines the positions and times for the source to ensure the correct dose for the treatment area. The applicator acts to guide the radioactive source to the correct location or locations for treatment.
Brachytherapy is a form of radiotherapy using Gamma rays from a radioactive source placed at locations close to or within a tumor or other treatment area to a predefined treatment plan. The treatment plan defines the positions and times for the source to ensure the correct dose for the treatment area. The applicator acts to guide the radioactive source to the correct location or locations for treatment.
V. Intended Use and Indications for Use
Intended Use
The Guided Aarhus Applicator Set is intended for use when performing HDR brachytherapy within a CT or MRI environment.
510(k) Summary - K252884
Traditional 510(k) Application
Guided Aarhus Applicator Set
{5}
Varian
A Siemens Healthineers Company
Indications for Use
The Guided Aarhus Applicator Set is indicated for use for cancer treatment of the vagina, vaginal stump, cervix, uterus, and endometrium using HDR brachytherapy.
The indications have been expanded to be more specific. The endometrium is part of the uterus but specifically the inner lining. The Vagina and the vaginal stump are related but the stump is the tissue remaining after a hysterectomy – this can be treated when the Guided Aarhus template is used in conjunction with the Guiding tube 60° ring for central needle (GM11013960). This change to the indication does not affect the safety or effectiveness of the device as the use of the template does not change based on this indication change.
The intended use has been updated to remove Pulse Dose Rate (PDR) as we are no longer expanding our applicator range for PDR use as we are removing support for this machine in the future.
There are minor changes made to the intended use and indications for use that do not affect the safety and effectiveness of the device when used as labelled. The core clinical application, target patient population, and intended user remain consistent with the predicate.
VI. Comparison of Technological Characteristics with the Predicate Device
The modifications include:
- Modification to the intended and indications for use
- Removed material UHU-plus endfest 300
- Removal of VariSource as compatible afterloader
- Additional ring diameter of 28mm
- Addition of guide tube collectors
- Steam sterilization is available for 18 min at 134C
- Anatomical sites now additionally include the vaginal stump and endometrium
| Feature and/or Specification | Predicate Device: Aarhus Applicator Set (K222775) | Subject Device: Guided Aarhus Applicator Set (K252884) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Intended Use | The Aarhus Applicator Set is intended for use when performing HDR or PDR brachytherapy within a CT or MRI environment. | The Guided Aarhus Applicator Set is intended for use when performing HDR brachytherapy within a CT or MRI environment. |
| Indications for Use | The Aarhus Applicator Set is indicated for cancer treatment of the vagina, cervix, and uterus using HDR or PDR brachytherapy within a hospital CT or MRI environment. | The Guided Aarhus Applicator Set is indicated for use for cancer treatment of the vagina, vaginal stump, cervix, uterus, and endometrium using HDR brachytherapy. |
| Design | Aarhus Applicator Set
Aarhus Vaginal Template:
• Ring-shape template in 60°.
• Ring diameter 32 mm and 36 mm.
• Straight and oblique needle-guiding holes. | Guided Aarhus Applicator Set
Guided Aarhus vaginal template:
• Ring-shape template in 60°.
• Ring diameter 28 mm, 32 mm, 36 mm.
• Straight and oblique needle-guiding holes. |
510(k) Summary - K252884
Traditional 510(k) Application
Guided Aarhus Applicator Set
{6}
Varian
A Siemens Healthineers Company
| | Needle Collector | Guide Tube Collectors for up to 7 and 11 needles.
Guiding tube 60° for a central needle. |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Compatible Afterloader | GammaMedplus Afterloader Series
VariSource Afterloader Series
BRAVOS Afterloader System | GammaMedplus Afterloader Series
BRAVOS Afterloader System |
| Materials | Vaginal Template:
• Victrex PEEK 450 G and PEEK 381 G
• EPO-TEK 0D2002 (Epoxy)
• UHU-plus endfest 300
Needle Collector:
• Victrex PEEK 450 G | Vaginal Template and Guiding Tube:
• Victrex PEEK 450 G and PEEK 381 G
• EPO-TEK 0D2002 (Epoxy)
Guide Tube Collector:
• Victrex PEEK 450 G |
| Packing | Individual | Individual |
| Sterility | Provided non-sterile | Provided non-sterile |
| Sterilization Method | Steam sterilization
• 4 minutes at 132°C
• 3 minutes at 134°C
• 5 minutes at 134°C | Steam sterilization
• 4 minutes at 132°C
• 3 minutes at 134°C
• 5 minutes at 134°C
• 18 minutes at 134°C |
| Biocompatibility | Full biocompatibility | Full biocompatibility |
| The Anatomical Sites | Vagina, cervix and uterus | Vagina, vaginal stump, cervix, uterus and endometrium |
| Environment | CT compatible
MR-Safe for components of the Aarhus Applicator Set.
MR-Conditional for the Aarhus Applicator Set in combination with plastic interstitial needles and intrauterine tandems. | CT compatible
MR-Safe for components of the Guided Aarhus Applicator Set.
MR-Conditional for the Guided Aarhus Applicator Set in combination with intrauterine tandems. |
| Where Used | Brachytherapy treatment room | Brachytherapy treatment room |
## VII. Summary of Performance Testing (Non-Clinical Testing)
The following performance data was provided in support of the substantial equivalence determination.
## Biocompatibility Testing:
The biocompatibility evaluation for the subject device was conducted according to ISO 10993-1 'Biological Evaluation of a Medical Device – Part 1: Evaluation and Testing Within a Risk Management Process.' This includes the following tests:
- Cytotoxicity
- Sensitization
- Irritation
- Pyrogenicity
- Acute Systemic Toxicity
510(k) Summary - K252884
Traditional 510(k) Application
Guided Aarhus Applicator Set
{7}
varian
A Siemens Healthineers Company
- Subacute Toxicity
- Implantation
- Chemical Characterization
- Toxicological Risk Assessment
The reports for the previous submission Aarhus Applicator Set K222775 is used to leverage the subject device Guided Aarhus Applicator Set. Please see the attachment Biological Evaluation for more information.
## Sterilization Testing:
Sterilization testing for the subject device was conducted to assess the effectiveness of the provided cleaning, disinfection, and sterilization procedures for the device. Furthermore, the components of the subject set were subjected to sterilization cycles up to the stated use life and evaluated for performance and any damage that might affect the safety or effectiveness.
## Electrical Safety and Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC):
This item is not applicable to the subject device. No electrical safety and electromagnetic compatibility tests have been included in this submission in support of the substantial equivalence determination.
## Magnetic Resonance (MR):
MR compatibility rationale was included as a summary. The vaginal templates, guiding tube, and guide tube collector are made from non-metallic, non-magnetic material, that are non-conducting. Therefore, no magnetically induced displacement force, magnetically induced torque, or radiofrequency induced heating may occur. No tests according to the standard ASTM F2052-21, ASTM F2213-17, or ASTM F2182-19 are required.
## Software Verification and Validation Testing:
This item is not applicable to the subject device. The devices do not contain or consist of software/firmware. No software verification and validation testing have been included in this submission in support of the substantial equivalence determination.
## Mechanical Testing:
Guided Aarhus Applicator Set has undergone formal design verification and design validation testing. The applicator was tested to withstand a minimum of 30N push and pull forces applied to templates shaft in axial direction while the ring is fixed and 30N between assembled template and tandem while template is fixed. Applicator and components were also tested to withstand the drop test as defined in IEC 60601-1 (drop of applicator in different orientations from a height of 1 m onto Hardwood Board). Both tests passed successfully. Design verification and design validation testing demonstrate that the subject device performs as intended. No acoustic testing was performed
Design verification and design validation testing was performed according to the FDA Quality System Regulation (21 CFR §820), ISO 13485 Quality Management System Standard, and ISO 14971 Risk Management Standard.
## Human Factors:
A human factors validation study was conducted according to the standard IEC 62366 to verify that the device performs well as intended for the intended users, uses and use environments. Participants performed two tasks using the Guided Aarhus Applicator Set as they would in their clinic. The collected
510(k) Summary - K252884
Traditional 510(k) Application
Guided Aarhus Applicator Set
{8}
Varian
A Siemens Healthineers Company
Usability Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) show that the evaluation has passed as no (safety) use errors were observed, and participants completed all tasks within the required (safe) time.
## Use of Consensus Standards:
The following list of FDA-recognized, voluntary consensus standards were utilized in the design and evaluation of the device's substantial equivalency to the predicate:
| ANSI/AAMI/ISO 14971:2019 | Medical devices - Applications of risk management to medical devices |
| --- | --- |
| ISO 15223-1:2021 | Medical devices - Symbols to be used with medical device labels, labelling and information to be supplied - Part 1: General requirements |
| IEC 62366-1:2015+A1:2020 | Application of Usability Engineering to Medical Devices |
| AAMI TIR12:2020 | Designing, testing and labeling reusable medical devices for reprocessing in health care facilities: A guide for medical device manufacturers |
| ANSI/AAMI ST98:2022 | Cleaning Validation of health care products –cleaning process for medical devices |
| ISO 17664-1:2021 | Processing of health care products - Information to be provided by the medical device manufacturer for the processing of medical devices - Part 1: Critical and semi-critical medical devices |
| ANSI/AAMI/ISO 11737-2:2020 | Sterilization of medical devices - Microbiological methods - Part 2: Tests of sterility performed in the definition, validation and maintenance of a sterilization process |
| EN ISO 17665-1:2006 | Sterilization of health care products - Moist heat - Part 1: Requirements for the development, validation and routine control of a sterilization process for medical devices |
| ISO/TS 17665-2:2009 | Sterilization of health care products –Moist heat –Part 2: Guidance on the application of ISO 17665-1 |
| ASTM D4332-22 | Standard Practice for Conditioning Containers, Packages, or Packaging Components for Testing |
| ASTM D4169:2009 | Standard Practice for Performance Testing of Shipping Containers and Systems |
| ANSI/AAMI/ISO 10993-1:2018 | Biological evaluation of medical devices -- Part 1: Evaluation and testing within a risk management process. |
| ANSI/AAMI/ISO 10993-5:2009 | Biological evaluation of medical devices – Part 5: Tests for in vitro cytotoxicity |
| ISO 10993-6:2016 | Biological evaluation of medical devices -- Part 6: Tests for local effects after implantation |
| ANSI/AAMI/ISO 10993-10:2010 | Biological evaluation of medical devices - Part 10: Tests for skin sensitization |
| ANSI/AAMI/ISO 10993-11:2017 | Biological evaluation of medical devices - Part 11: Tests for systemic toxicity |
| ISO 10993-12:2021 | Biological evaluation of medical devices –Part 12: Sample preparation and reference materials |
510(k) Summary - K252884
Traditional 510(k) Application
Guided Aarhus Applicator Set
{9}
Varian
A Siemens Healthineers Company
| ANSI/AAMI/ISO 10993-17:2002 | Biological evaluation of medical devices - Part 17: Toxicological risk assessment of medical device constituents |
| --- | --- |
| ANSI/AAMI/ISO 10993-18:2020/ AMD 1:2022 | Biological evaluation of medical devices -- Part 18: Chemical characterization of medical device materials within a risk management process |
| IEC 60601-1:2005+A1:2012 | Medical electrical equipment - Part 1: General requirements for basic safety and essential performance |
| IEC 60601-2-17:2013 | Medical electrical equipment - Part 2-17: Particular requirements for the safety of automatically-controlled brachytherapy afterloading equipment |
| ASTM F2503–23 | Standard Practice for Marking Medical Devices and Other Items for Safety in the Magnetic Resonance Environment |
| EN ISO 20417:2021 | Information supplied by the manufacturer of medical devices |
| EN ISO 11138-7:2019 | Sterilization of health care products – Biological indicators – Part 7: Guidance for the selection, use and interpretation of results |
| ASTM F3293-18 | Standard Guide for Application of Test Soils for the Validation of Cleaning Methods for Reusable Devices |
| ASTM F3208-20 | Standard Guide for Selecting Test Soils for Validation of Cleaning Methods for Reusable Devices |
## VIII. Determination of Substantial Equivalence to the Predicate
There are no changes in the design or principle of operation of the devices. Varian believes the major technological characteristics are substantially equivalent to the predicate device.
The indications have been expanded to be more specific to include the endometrium, vagina, and vaginal stump. This change to the indication does not affect the safety or effectiveness of the device as the use of the template does not change based on this indication change. The intended use has been updated to remove Pulse Dose Rate (PDR) as we are removing support for this machine in the future.
The results of verification and validation as well as conformance to relevant safety standards demonstrate that the device meets the safety and performance criteria. Conclusions drawn from performance tests demonstrate substantial equivalence (SE). Varian considers Guided Aarhus Applicator Set to be substantially equivalent to the predicate device (K222775).
510(k) Summary - K252884
Traditional 510(k) Application
Guided Aarhus Applicator Set
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.