K252828 · Jiangsu Jumao X-Care Medical Equipment Co., , Ltd. · IOR · Dec 5, 2025 · Physical Medicine
Device Facts
Record ID
K252828
Device Name
Manual Wheelchair (W47)
Applicant
Jiangsu Jumao X-Care Medical Equipment Co., , Ltd.
Product Code
IOR · Physical Medicine
Decision Date
Dec 5, 2025
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 890.3850
Device Class
Class 1
Indications for Use
The W47 Manual Wheelchair is to provide mobility to persons limited to a sitting position.
Device Story
Manual wheelchair; provides mobility to seated occupants. Occupant propels by turning rear wheels by hand; handles provided for caregiver-assisted pushing. Features steel frame, four wheels, flame-resistant upholstery, hand brake levers on push handles, and wheel locks. Used in various settings for adult patients requiring mobility aid. Device output is physical mobility; healthcare provider uses device to facilitate patient transport and independence. Benefits include improved patient mobility and accessibility.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical or animal studies were conducted. Substantial equivalence is supported by bench testing, including static stability (ISO 7176-1), brake effectiveness (ISO 7176-3), dimensions/mass (ISO 7176-5), seating dimensions (ISO 7176-7), strength requirements (ISO 7176-8), test dummies (ISO 7176-11), friction (ISO 7176-13), labeling (ISO 7176-15), ignition resistance (ISO 16840-10), and set-up procedures (ISO 7176-22).
Technological Characteristics
Mechanical wheelchair; steel frame; polyurethane (PU) foam seat/back/arm pads. Features: four wheels, rear offset/quick-release axle, hand brake levers, wheel locks. Dimensions: 1340mm x 690mm x 950mm. Weight capacity: 136kg. Biocompatibility per ISO 10993-1 and FDA 2023 guidance. No software or electronic components.
Indications for Use
Indicated for adults (age ≥22 years) limited to a sitting position requiring mobility assistance.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A mechanical wheelchair is a manually operated device with wheels that is intended for medical purposes to provide mobility to persons restricted to a sitting position.
{0}
FDA U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION
December 5, 2025
Jiangsu Jumao X-Care Medical Equipment Co., Ltd.
Ariel Xiang
No.36 Danyan Road
Danyang, Jiangsu
China
Re: K252828
Trade/Device Name: Manual Wheelchair (Model W47)
Regulation Number: 21 CFR 890.3850
Regulation Name: Mechanical Wheelchair
Regulatory Class: Class I, reserved
Product Code: IOR
Dated: September 5, 2025
Received: September 5, 2025
Dear Ariel Xiang:
We have reviewed your section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database available at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Additional information about changes that may require a new premarket notification are provided in the FDA guidance documents entitled "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Change to an Existing Device"
U.S. Food & Drug Administration
10903 New Hampshire Avenue
Silver Spring, MD 20993
www.fda.gov
{1}
K252828 - Ariel Xiang
Page 2
(https://www.fda.gov/media/99812/download) and "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Software Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99785/download).
Your device is also subject to, among other requirements, the Quality System (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820), which includes, but is not limited to, 21 CFR 820.30, Design controls; 21 CFR 820.90, Nonconforming product; and 21 CFR 820.100, Corrective and preventive action. Please note that regardless of whether a change requires premarket review, the QS regulation requires device manufacturers to review and approve changes to device design and production (21 CFR 820.30 and 21 CFR 820.70) and document changes and approvals in the device master record (21 CFR 820.181).
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR Part 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reporting-combination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR Parts 1000-1050.
All medical devices, including Class I and unclassified devices and combination product device constituent parts are required to be in compliance with the final Unique Device Identification System rule ("UDI Rule"). The UDI Rule requires, among other things, that a device bear a unique device identifier (UDI) on its label and package (21 CFR 801.20(a)) unless an exception or alternative applies (21 CFR 801.20(b)) and that the dates on the device label be formatted in accordance with 21 CFR 801.18. The UDI Rule (21 CFR 830.300(a) and 830.320(b)) also requires that certain information be submitted to the Global Unique Device Identification Database (GUDID) (21 CFR Part 830 Subpart E). For additional information on these requirements, please see the UDI System webpage at https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance/unique-device-identification-system-udi-system.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reporting-mdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about medical devices and radiation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
{2}
K252828 - Ariel Xiang
Page 3
Sincerely,
Tushar Bansal -S
Tushar Bansal, PhD
Acting Assistant Director, Acute Injury Devices Team
DHT5B: Division of Neuromodulation and
Physical Medicine Devices
OHT5: Office of Neurological and
Physical Medicine Devices
Office of Product Evaluation and Quality
Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{3}
FORM FDA 3881 (8/23)
Page 1 of 1
PSC Publishing Services (301) 443-6740
EF
| DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Food and Drug Administration Indications for Use | Form Approved: OMB No. 0910-0120 Expiration Date: 07/31/2026 See PRA Statement below. |
| --- | --- |
| 510(k) Number (if known) K252828 | |
| Device Name Manual Wheelchair (Model W47) | |
| Indications for Use (Describe) The W47 Manual Wheelchair is to provide mobility to persons limited to a sitting position. | |
| Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable) ☐ Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) ☑ Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C) | |
| CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED. | |
| This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.* | |
| The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to: Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov | |
| "An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number." | |
{4}
510(K) Summary
Prepared by 2025/12/2
Applicant Information:
Jiangsu Jumao X-Care Medical Equipment Co., Ltd.
Address: No.36 Danyan Road, Danyang City, Jiangsu, P.R. China
Device Name: Manual Wheelchair
Model: W47
Regulatory Information
Classification Name: Mechanical Wheelchair
Regulatory Class: I
Product code: IOR
Regulation Number: 890.3850
Review Panel: Physical Medicine
Device overview
A wheelchair is a chair with wheels, designed to be a replacement for walking, where it is propelled by the seated occupant turning the rear wheels by hand. There are also handles behind the seat for someone else to do the pushing. The device is intended for adults only (age ≥22 years).
1 / 10
{5}
W47 is a mechanical wheelchair including four wheels, a steel frame and a seat and back upholstery that is flame resistant. W47 has a physical dimension of 1340mm × 690mm × 950mm (overall length × overall width × handgrip height) with the seat itself has a dimension of 580mm × 450mm × 465mm (effective depth × width × seat height at front edge). The device has a weight capacity of 136 kilograms, and weighs about 24 kilograms. The armrest is non flip back/non height adjustable. Rear axle is offset axle, quick release axle. The device features hand brake levers on the rear push handles as well as wheel locks (parking brakes).
## Indications for use
The W47 manual wheelchair is to provide mobility to persons limited to a sitting position.
## Substantial Equivalence Information:
K170517
Merits Model R106/R136 Rehab Wheelchair
Merits Healthcare Industries (suzhou) Co., LTD.
1. Product Parameter
{6}
Table 1 General Comparison
| | Proposed Device | Primary predicate device | Comparison |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 510k Number | --- | K170517 | --- |
| Product Code | IOR | IOR | Same |
| Proprietary Name | Manual Wheelchair | Merits Model R106/R136 Rehab Wheelchair | --- |
| Model | W47 | R106, R136 | --- |
| Manufacturer | Jiangsu Jumao X-Care Medical Equipment Co., Ltd. | Merits Healthcare Industries. (suzhou) Co., LTD. | --- |
{7}
| Indications for Use | The W47 manual wheelchair is to provide mobility to persons limited to a sitting position. | The Merits Model R106/R136 Rehab Wheelchair is to provide mobility to persons limited to a sitting position. | Same |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Basic Design | W47 is a mechanical wheelchair including four wheels, a steel frame and a seat and back upholstery that is flame resistant. | The Merits Model R106/R136 Rehab Wheelchair are manual wheelchairs. They have adjustable headrest, adjustable armrests, cozy ergonomics seat and multiple axle position. | Same |
| Control Mode | Mechanical | Mechanical | Same |
| Physical Dimension | 1340mm × 690mm × 950mm (length × width × handgrip height) | Model R106: 47.5" (±1") × 28-32" (±1") × 42" (±1")
i. e. 1026mm × 711mm ~ 813mm × 1067mm
Model R136: 44.5" (±1") | Similar
The difference does not affect the effectiveness and safety. |
4 / 10
{8}
| | | × 26-30” (±1”) × 42” (±1”)
i.e. 1130mm × 660mm ~ 762mm × 1067mm | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Total Mass | 24kg | Model R106: 89 lbs / 40.4kg
Model R136: 62 lbs / 28.1kg | Similar
The difference does not affect the effectiveness and safety. |
| Weight capacity | 300lb (136kg) | 300 lbs (136kg) | Same |
| Seat dimensions | 580mm × 450mm × 465mm
(effective depth × width × handgrip height) | Width:16-20”(406-508mm)
Height: Model R106: 19-21”(483-533mm);
Model R136: 21”(533mm)
Depth: 18-20”(457-508mm) | Similar
The difference does not affect the effectiveness and safety. |
| Armrest | Non flip back/Non height adjustable | Height Adjustable (8”~12”) | Similar
The difference does not affect the effectiveness and safety. |
| Rear Wheel | 606mm (23.9”) | Model R106: 610mm(24”) | Same |
5 / 10
{9}
| | | Model R136: 317.5mm(12-1/2") | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Casters | 198mm (7.8") | 177.8mm (7") | Similar
The casters diameter
of the subject device
is larger than
K170517. The difference
does not affect the
effectiveness and safety. |
| Headrest | Adjustable | Adjustable | Similar
The difference does
not affect the
effectiveness and safety. |
| Wheel Lock | Pull to Lock | Pull to Lock | Same |
| Frame Materials | Steel | Steel | Same |
| Seat/Backrest
/Arm Pad: | Polyurethanes (PU) | PU Foam | Same |
| Performance | Comply with:
ISO7176-1 | Comply with:
ISO7176-1 | Same |
6 / 10
{10}
7 / 10
| | ISO7176-3 | ISO7176-3 | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | ISO7176-5 | ISO7176-5 | |
| | ISO7176-7 | ISO7176-7 | |
| | ISO7176-8 | ISO7176-8 | |
| | ISO7176-11 | ISO7176-11 | |
| | ISO7176-13 | ISO7176-13 | |
| | ISO7176-15 | ISO7176-15 | |
| | ISO16840-10 | ISO7176-16 | |
| | ISO10993-1 | ISO10993-1 | |
Table 2 safety comparison
| Item | Proposed Device | Predicate Device | Results |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Biocompatibility | The biocompatibility of the subject device is based on the use of low-biocompatibility-risk materials in accordance with Attachment G of FDA’s 2023 Biocompatibility Guidance. | All user directly contacting materials are compliance with ISO10993-5 and ISO10993-10 requirements. | S.E. |
| Performance | ISO 7176 -1/-3/-5/-7/-8/-11/-13/-15/-22, ISO 16840-10 | ISO7176 -1/-3/-5/-7/-8/-11/-13/-15/-22, ISO 16840-10 | S.E. |
{11}
| Label and labeling | Conforms to FDA Regulatory requirements | Conforms to FDA Regulatory requirements | S.E. |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
## 2. Substantial Equivalence Discussion
The proposed device and predicate device are complying to the same ISO standards, ISO 7176-1, ISO 7176-3, ISO 7176-5, ISO 7176-7, ISO 7176-8, ISO 7176-10, ISO 7176-11, ISO 7176-13, ISO 7176-15, ISO 16840-10 and FDA guidance.
The proposed device performs in a similar manner to the predicate device. All these tests have corresponding requirements/ control criteria following above mentioned standards. And the test results show that the subject product is substantially equivalent to the predicate device in performance.
The performance testing demonstrates that the subject device is substantially equivalent to the predicate devices regarding Static ability (tipping angle), Dimension and weight, Dimension of wheel Static, impact and fatigue strengths, Dummy, friction of test surfaces, Documentation and labeling, Resistance to ignition.
The non-clinical laboratory data support the safety and performance of the subject device and demonstrate that the subject device should perform as intended in the specified use conditions.
{12}
9 / 10
# 3. Summary of non-clinical testing
The following performance data were provided to verify that the proposed device met all design specifications and provided support of the substantial equivalence determination.
ISO 7176-1:2014 Wheelchairs - Part 1: Determination of static stability
ISO 7176-3:2012 Wheelchairs - Part 3: Determination of effectiveness of brakes
ISO 7176-5:2008 Wheelchairs - Part 5: Determination of dimensions, mass and maneuvering space
ISO 7176-7:1998 Wheelchairs - Part 7: Measurement of seating and wheel dimensions
ISO 7176-8:2014 Wheelchairs - Part 8: Requirements and test methods for static, impact and fatigue strength
ISO 7176-11:2012 Wheelchairs - Part 11: Test dummies
ISO 7176-13:1989 Wheelchairs - Part 13: Determination of coefficient of friction of test surfaces.
ISO 7176-15:1996 Wheelchairs - Part 15: Requirements for information disclosure, documentation and labeling.
ISO 16840-10:2021 Wheelchair seating - Part 10: Resistance to ignition of postural support devices - Requirements and test method
ISO 7176-22: 2014 Wheelchairs - Part 22: Set-up procedures
# Biocompatibility of patient-contacting material
The biocompatibility of the subject device is based on the use of low-biocompatibility-risk materials in accordance with Attachment G of FDA's 2023 Biocompatibility Guidance ("Use of International Standard ISO
{13}
10993-1, ‘Biological evaluation of medical devices - Part 1: Evaluation and testing within a risk management process’).
## 4. Summary of clinical testing
No animal study and clinical studies are available for our device. Clinical testing was not required to demonstrate the substantial equivalence of the manual wheelchair to its predicate device.
## 5. Substantial Equivalence Conclusion
Based on the comparison and analysis above, the proposed device is determined to be Substantially Equivalent (SE) to the predicate devices, K170517 Merits Model R106/R136 Rehab Wheelchair.
10 /
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.