Atramat® PGLA90 Poly(glycolide-co-L-lactide) Surgical Sutures are indicated for use in general soft tissue approximation and/or ligation, including use in ophthalmic procedures, but not for use in cardiovascular and neurological tissues.
Device Story
Atramat® PGLA90 (Calypso/Odysseus) are synthetic, absorbable, multifilament surgical sutures modified from predicate K072859. Device incorporates stainless steel (SUS 302) metal part featuring pre-tied knot mechanism. Used by surgeons in clinical settings for soft tissue approximation/ligation. Modification replaces traditional manual hand-tying with pre-tied knot closure to simplify surgical procedure. Suture material, intended use, and indications remain identical to predicate. Device provides mechanical tissue support during healing; absorbed over 56-70 days. Benefit includes reduced surgical time and simplified knotting process.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical testing was conducted for this submission. Bench testing only, including knot-pull tensile strength per USP <881> and biocompatibility evaluation of added components.
Indicated for general soft tissue approximation and/or ligation in patients requiring surgical sutures, including ophthalmic procedures. Contraindicated for use in cardiovascular and neurological tissues.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
An absorbable poly(glycolide/l-lactide) surgical suture (PGL suture) is an absorbable sterile, flexible strand as prepared and synthesized from homopolymers of glycolide and copolymers made from 90 percent glycolide and 10 percent l-lactide, and is indicated for use in soft tissue approximation. A PGL suture meets United States Pharmacopeia (U.S.P.) requirements as described in the U.S.P. “Monograph for Absorbable Surgical Sutures;” it may be monofilament or multifilament (braided) in form; it may be uncoated or coated; and it may be undyed or dyed with an FDA-approved color additive. Also, the suture may be provided with or without a standard needle attached.
Special Controls
*Classification.* Class II (special controls). The special control for this device is FDA's “Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Surgical Sutures; Guidance for Industry and FDA.” See § 878.1(e) for the availability of this guidance document.
{0}
FDA U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION
October 03, 2025
Internacional Farmacéutica S.A de C.V
Diana Berriozabal
Regulatory Intelligence Manager
Circuito De La Industria Poniente Lote 10-c Colonia Parque
Industrial El Cerrillo
Lerma, 52000
Mexico
Re: K252820
Trade/Device Name: PGLA90 Poly(glycolide-co-L-lactide) Surgical Sutures (Calypso); PGLA90 Poly(glycolide-co-L-lactide) Surgical Sutures (Odysseus)
Regulation Number: 21 CFR 878.4493
Regulation Name: Absorbable Poly(Glycolide/L-Lactide) Surgical Suture
Regulatory Class: Class II
Product Code: GAM
Dated: September 4, 2025
Received: September 4, 2025
Dear Diana Berriozabal:
We have reviewed your section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database available at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
U.S. Food & Drug Administration
10903 New Hampshire Avenue
Silver Spring, MD 20993
www.fda.gov
{1}
K252820 - Diana Berriozabal
Page 2
Additional information about changes that may require a new premarket notification are provided in the FDA guidance documents entitled "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99812/download) and "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Software Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99785/download).
Your device is also subject to, among other requirements, the Quality System (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820), which includes, but is not limited to, 21 CFR 820.30, Design controls; 21 CFR 820.90, Nonconforming product; and 21 CFR 820.100, Corrective and preventive action. Please note that regardless of whether a change requires premarket review, the QS regulation requires device manufacturers to review and approve changes to device design and production (21 CFR 820.30 and 21 CFR 820.70) and document changes and approvals in the device master record (21 CFR 820.181).
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR Part 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reporting-combination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR Parts 1000-1050.
All medical devices, including Class I and unclassified devices and combination product device constituent parts are required to be in compliance with the final Unique Device Identification System rule ("UDI Rule"). The UDI Rule requires, among other things, that a device bear a unique device identifier (UDI) on its label and package (21 CFR 801.20(a)) unless an exception or alternative applies (21 CFR 801.20(b)) and that the dates on the device label be formatted in accordance with 21 CFR 801.18. The UDI Rule (21 CFR 830.300(a) and 830.320(b)) also requires that certain information be submitted to the Global Unique Device Identification Database (GUDID) (21 CFR Part 830 Subpart E). For additional information on these requirements, please see the UDI System webpage at https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance/unique-device-identification-system-udi-system.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reporting-mdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about medical devices and radiation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See
{2}
K252820 - Diana Berriozabal
Page 3
the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
TEK N. LAMICHHANE -S
Tek N. Lamichhane, Ph.D.
Assistant Director
DHT4B: Division of Plastic and
Reconstructive Surgery Devices
OHT4: Office of Surgical and
Infection Control Devices
Office of Product Evaluation and Quality
Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{3}
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
Indications for Use
Form Approved: OMB No. 0910-0120
Expiration Date: 07/31/2026
See PRA Statement below.
Submission Number (if known)
K252820
Device Name
Atramat® PGLA90 Poly(glycolide-co-L-lactide) Surgical Sutures
Indications for Use (Describe)
Atramat® PGLA90 Poly(glycolide-co-L-lactide) Surgical Sutures are indicated for use in general soft tissue approximation and/or ligation, including use in ophthalmic procedures, but not for use in cardiovascular and neurological tissues.
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
☑ Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
☐ Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
# CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
"DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW."
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
Department of Health and Human Services
Food and Drug Administration
Office of Chief Information Officer
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff
PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{4}
510(k) Summary
K252820
1. Submitter's Identification:
IINTERNACIONAL FARMACEUTICA, S.A. DE C.V.
CIRCUITO DE LA INDUSTRIA PONIENTE LOTE 10-C COLONIA PARQUE INDUSTRIAL
EL CERRILLO LERMA, Mexico, 52000
2. Submission Correspondent
DIANA BERRIOZABAL
Regulatory Intelligence Manager
Phone: +525511050260
E-mail: diana.berriozabal@atramat.com
3. Date Prepared
Sep. 4th, 2025
4. Device Identification:
Trade/Proprietary Name: Atramat® PGLA90 Poly(glycolide-co-L-lactide) Surgical Sutures
Common/Usual Name: Poly(glycolide-co-L-lactide) Surgical Sutures
Classification Name: Poly(glycolide-co-L-lactide) Surgical Sutures
Review Panel: General & Plastic Surgery Devices Panel
Regulation Number: 878.4493
Class: Class II
Product Code: GAM
5. Device Description
The subject devices, ATRAMAT® PGLA90 (Calypso/Odysseus), are modifications to the previously cleared Atramat® PGLA90 Poly(glycolide-co-L-lactide) Surgical Suture (K072859). The predicate device is a synthetic, absorbable, sterile surgical suture composed of a copolymer of glycolide and L-lactide, which is indicated for soft tissue approximation.
K252820- 510(k) summary; Page 1
{5}
ATRAMAT® PGLA90 (Calypso/Odysseus) devices integrate the predicate suture into a metal part with a pre-tied knot mechanism. This modification changes the operating method from traditional hand-tying to a pre-tied knot closure.
## 6. Indication for use:
Atramat® PGLA90 Poly(glycolide-co-L-lactide) Surgical Sutures are indicated for use in general soft tissue approximation and/or ligation, including use in ophthalmic procedures, but not for use in cardiovascular and neurological tissues.
## 7. Technological Characteristics Comparison to Predicate Device
The subject devices, ATRAMAT® PGLA90 (Calypso/Odysseus), are claimed to be substantially equivalent to the Atramat® PGLA90 Poly(glycolide-co-L-lactide) Surgical Sutures, which were cleared under 510(k) K072859. The fundamental technology, intended use, and suture material are identical to the predicate device.
Comparison of Characteristics
| | Subject Product
K252820 | | Predicate Product
K072859 | Comments | Comparison |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | ATRAMAT®PGLA90
(Calypso) | ATRAMAT®PGLA90
(Odysseus) | Atramat®PGLA90 | | |
| Product Code / Regulation | GAM/ 21 CFR
878.4493 | GAM/ 21 CFR
878.4493 | GAM/ 21 CFR
878.4493 | | Same |
| Intended Use | Absorbable surgical sutures for use in soft tissue | Absorbable surgical sutures for use in soft tissue | Absorbable surgical sutures for use in soft tissue | | Same |
| Indications for Use | General soft tissue approximation and/or ligation, including use in ophthalmic procedures, but not | General soft tissue approximation and/or ligation, including use in ophthalmic procedures, but not | General soft tissue approximation and/or ligation, including use in ophthalmic procedures, but | | Same |
K252820- 510(k) summary; Page 2
{6}
K252820-510(k) summary; Page 3
| | for use in cardiovascular and neurological tissues. | for use in cardiovascular and neurological tissues. | not for use in cardiovascular and neurological tissues. | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| **Material** | PGLA | PGLA | PGLA | | Same |
| **Suture Characteristics** | Synthetic absorbable multifilament | Synthetic absorbable multifilament | Synthetic absorbable multifilament | | Same |
| **Sterilization** | Ethylene oxide | Ethylene oxide | Ethylene oxide | | Same |
| **Size (USP)** | Compliant with USP 2 to 6-0 | Compliant with USP 2 to 6-0 | Compliant with USP 2 to 6-0 | | Same |
| **Suture Contact Type** | Implant, Absorbable | Implant, Absorbable | Implant, Absorbable | | Same |
| **Suture Contact Duration** | 56 - 70 days | 56 - 70 days | 56 - 70 days | | Same |
| **Dimensions L*W*H(mm)** | Metal part 10*4*2.4 | Metal part 13*5*1.8 | Without metal part | The subject product with one metal part at the end of suture. | Different |
| **Suture Tensile Strength** | Compliant with USP <881> requirements | Compliant with USP <881> requirements | Compliant with USP <881> requirements | | Same |
| **Suture-Needle Attachment** | Compliant with USP <871> requirements | Without Needle | Compliant with USP <871> requirements | | Same |
| **Accessories** | Metal part | Metal part | Without metal part | The subject product with one metal part at the end of suture. | Different |
{7}
| Accessory Material (Patient Contacting) | Stainless Steel (SUS 302 | Stainless Steel (SUS 302 | Stainless Steel (SUS 302 | | Same |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Operating Method | Utilizes a pre-tied knot to simplify knotting process | Utilizes a pre-tied knot to simplify knotting process | Hand-tying knotting process | The subject devices simplify the knotting process by using a pre-tied knot, whereas the predicate device requires a manual, hand-tying process. | Different |
| Mechanism | Double sheet band of single loop | Double sheet band of double loop | Surgeon Knot | The subject devices are with a pre-tied knot on a metal part. | Different |
This submission is to add the following to the products cleared under K072859:
- Dimensions L*W*H(mm)
- Accessories
- Operating Method
- Mechanism
# 8. Non-Clinical Performance Data
Additional non-clinical testing was conducted for this 510(k) submission in accordance with the FDA guidance "Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Surgical Sutures" to confirm that the subject devices meet all design inputs and specifications.
The technological differences between the subject devices and the predicate relate to the product's final dimensions, accessories, operating method, and mechanism. These differences all stem from a single design innovation: the subject devices incorporate a metal part with a pre-tied knot, which is designed to simplify the
K252820- 510(k) summary; Page 4
{8}
surgical procedure by removing the need for manual, hand-tied knots.
Performance testing was conducted to ensure that these modifications do not introduce new concerns regarding safety or effectiveness. To validate the integrity of the new pre-tied knot mechanism, knot-pull tensile strength was evaluated per the USP <881> standard. The biocompatibility evaluation of additionally introduced components were assessed.
The results of this non-clinical performance testing demonstrate that the subject devices are substantially equivalent to the predicate device.
No animal testing was conducted for this submission
No clinical testing was conducted for this submission
9. Statement of Substantial Equivalence
Based on all testing and evidence, the subject device presents no new concerns regarding safety or effectiveness. For its intended use and indications for use, its performance is at least as safe and effective as the predicate device. Therefore, the device is considered substantially equivalent to the predicate.
K252820- 510(k) summary; Page 5
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.