The Freedom® Total Knee System is indicated for the following: • Severe knee joint pain, loss of mobility, and disability due to: rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis, traumatic arthritis, polyarthritis. • Correction of functional deformities. • Post-traumatic loss of knee joint contour, particularly when there is patellofemoral erosion, dysfunction, or prior patellectomy. • Moderate valgus, varus, or flexion trauma. • Knee fractures untreatable by other methods. • Revision surgery where sufficient bone stock and soft tissue integrity are present (For PCK Components, and Primary PCK Components, and Metaphyseal Cones only). The Freedom Porous Tibial Base Plate, and Cementless Femoral Components, and Metaphyseal Cones are indicated for Cemented or Uncemented use. All other components are indicated for cemented use only. The Freedom Metaphyseal Cones are additionally indicated for use in addressing tibial bone voids and/or metaphyseal reconstruction.
Device Story
Freedom Metaphyseal Cone Implants are orthopedic components for tibial bone voids and metaphyseal reconstruction in total knee arthroplasty. Implants feature elliptical, stepped design; sizes range 25-60mm (ML) by 29-36mm (AP); 30mm length. Internal diameter accommodates Freedom Knee Stemmed Tibial Baseplate and Stem Extension; includes cement pockets and relief slots for baseplate fins. External surfaces feature 1mm thick additive-manufactured scaffold structure mimicking cancellous bone porosity. Used in clinical settings by orthopedic surgeons during revision or primary knee procedures. Implants provide structural support for tibial baseplates, enhancing construct stability. Benefit includes restoration of bone stock and improved fixation in compromised metaphyseal bone.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical data. Evidence consists of bench testing and cadaveric simulation. Mechanical evaluation included scaffold performance testing, dynamic fatigue testing (per ASTM F1800), and comparative cross-section analysis. Biocompatibility, sterilization, and shelf-life were validated by leveraging existing data from the secondary predicate (K241597) due to identical materials and manufacturing processes. Cadaveric simulation validated user needs and functional requirements.
Technological Characteristics
Material: Ti6Al4V ELI (ASTM F3001). Construction: Additive manufacturing (3D printing) for scaffold structure. Design: Elliptical, stepped geometry with 1mm thick porous scaffold. Connectivity: None (mechanical implant). Sterilization: Validated via existing predicate methods. Software: None.
Indications for Use
Indicated for patients with severe knee joint pain, loss of mobility, or disability due to rheumatoid, osteoarthritis, traumatic arthritis, or polyarthritis; functional deformities; post-traumatic loss of knee contour; moderate valgus, varus, or flexion trauma; knee fractures; and revision surgery requiring tibial bone void filling or metaphyseal reconstruction.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A knee joint patellofemorotibial metal/polymer porous-coated uncemented prosthesis is a device intended to be implanted to replace a knee joint. The device limits translation and rotation in one or more planes via the geometry of its articulating surfaces. It has no linkage across-the-joint. This generic type of device is designed to achieve biological fixation to bone without the use of bone cement. This identification includes fixed-bearing knee prostheses where the ultra high molecular weight polyethylene tibial bearing is rigidly secured to the metal tibial base plate.
Special Controls
*Classification.* Class II (special controls). The special control is FDA's guidance: “Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Knee Joint Patellofemorotibial and Femorotibial Metal/Polymer Porous-Coated Uncemented Prostheses; Guidance for Industry and FDA.” See § 888.1 for the availability of this guidance.
Freedom® Total Knee System - Porous Tibial Base Plate (K241597)
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}
FDA U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION
October 31, 2025
Maxx Orthopedics, Inc.
Donald Guthner
Regulatory Consultant
2460 General Armistead Ave
Suite 100
Norristown, Pennsylvania 19403
Re: K252777
Trade/Device Name: Freedom Metaphyseal Cone Implants (Metaphyseal Cones)
Regulation Number: 21 CFR 888.3565
Regulation Name: Knee Joint Patellofemorotibial Metal/Polymer Porous-Coated Uncemented Prosthesis
Regulatory Class: Class II
Product Code: MBH, JWH
Dated: August 28, 2025
Received: September 2, 2025
Dear Donald Guthner:
We have reviewed your section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database available at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
U.S. Food & Drug Administration
10903 New Hampshire Avenue
Silver Spring, MD 20993
www.fda.gov
{1}
K252777 - Donald Guthner
Page 2
Additional information about changes that may require a new premarket notification are provided in the FDA guidance documents entitled "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99812/download) and "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Software Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99785/download).
Your device is also subject to, among other requirements, the Quality System (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820), which includes, but is not limited to, 21 CFR 820.30, Design controls; 21 CFR 820.90, Nonconforming product; and 21 CFR 820.100, Corrective and preventive action. Please note that regardless of whether a change requires premarket review, the QS regulation requires device manufacturers to review and approve changes to device design and production (21 CFR 820.30 and 21 CFR 820.70) and document changes and approvals in the device master record (21 CFR 820.181).
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR Part 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reporting-combination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR Parts 1000-1050.
All medical devices, including Class I and unclassified devices and combination product device constituent parts are required to be in compliance with the final Unique Device Identification System rule ("UDI Rule"). The UDI Rule requires, among other things, that a device bear a unique device identifier (UDI) on its label and package (21 CFR 801.20(a)) unless an exception or alternative applies (21 CFR 801.20(b)) and that the dates on the device label be formatted in accordance with 21 CFR 801.18. The UDI Rule (21 CFR 830.300(a) and 830.320(b)) also requires that certain information be submitted to the Global Unique Device Identification Database (GUDID) (21 CFR Part 830 Subpart E). For additional information on these requirements, please see the UDI System webpage at https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance/unique-device-identification-system-udi-system.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reporting-mdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about medical devices and radiation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-
{2}
K252777 - Donald Guthner
Page 3
assistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,

Lixin Liu, PhD
Assistant Director
DHT6A: Division of Joint Arthroplasty Devices
OHT6: Office of Orthopedic Devices
Office of Product Evaluation and Quality
Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{3}
FORM FDA 3881 (8/23)
Page 1 of 1
PSC Publishing Services (301) 443-6740
EF
| DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Food and Drug Administration Indications for Use | Form Approved: OMB No. 0910-0120 Expiration Date: 07/31/2026 See PRA Statement below. |
| --- | --- |
| 510(k) Number (if known) K252777 | |
| Device Name Freedom Metaphyseal Cone Implants (Metaphyseal Cones) | |
| Indications for Use (Describe) The Freedom® Total Knee System is indicated for the following: • Severe knee joint pain, loss of mobility, and disability due to: rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis, traumatic arthritis, polyarthritis. • Correction of functional deformities. • Post-traumatic loss of knee joint contour, particularly when there is patellofemoral erosion, dysfunction, or prior patellectomy. • Moderate valgus, varus, or flexion trauma. • Knee fractures untreatable by other methods. • Revision surgery where sufficient bone stock and soft tissue integrity are present (For PCK Components, and Primary PCK Components, and Metaphyseal Cones only). | |
| The Freedom Porous Tibial Base Plate, and Cementless Femoral Components, and Metaphyseal Cones are indicated for Cemented or Uncemented use. All other components are indicated for cemented use only. | |
| The Freedom Metaphyseal Cones are additionally indicated for use in addressing tibial bone voids and/or metaphyseal reconstruction. | |
| Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable) ☑ Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) ☐ Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C) | |
| CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED. | |
| This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.* | |
| The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to: Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov | |
| "An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number." | |
{4}
510(k) #: K252777
510(k) Summary
Prepared on: 2025-10-29
| Contact Details | 21 CFR 807.92(a)(1) |
| --- | --- |
| Applicant Name | Maxx Orthopedics, Inc. |
| Applicant Address | 2460 General Armistead Ave Suite 100 Norristown PA 19403 United States |
| Applicant Contact Telephone | 646-460-2984 |
| Applicant Contact | Mr. Donald Guthner |
| Applicant Contact Email | don.guthner@maxxortho.com |
| Device Name | 21 CFR 807.92(a)(2) |
| --- | --- |
| Device Trade Name | Freedom Metaphyseal Cone Implants (Metaphyseal Cones) |
| Common Name | Total Knee Joint Replacement |
| Classification Name | Knee joint patellofemorotibial metal/polymer porous-coated uncemented prosthesis. |
| Regulation Number | 888.3565 |
| Product Code(s) | MBH, JWH |
| Legally Marketed Predicate Devices | 21 CFR 807.92(a)(3) |
| --- | --- |
| Predicate # | Predicate Trade Name (Primary Predicate is listed first) | Product Code |
| --- | --- | --- |
| K143393 | Triathlon Tritanium Cone Augments | MBH |
| K241597 | Freedom® Total Knee System - Porous Tibial Base Plate | MBH |
| Device Description Summary | 21 CFR 807.92(a)(4) |
| --- | --- |
The subject device, Freedom Knee Metaphyseal Cone implants, is a component addition to the cleared Freedom Total Knee System for addressing tibial bone voids and/or metaphyseal reconstruction. The Freedom Knee Metaphyseal Cone implants are designed with an elliptical shape, scaling larger in the Medial-Lateral (ML) direction than the Anterior-Posterior (AP) direction. The sizes are driven by the ML size, ranging from 25mm to 60mm wide in the ML direction and 29mm to 36mm AP in the AP direction. The cones are all 30mm long and feature a stepped design to further enhance the stability in the proximal-distal direction.
The Freedom Knee Metaphyseal Cone implants feature a large internal diameter to accept the largest possible Freedom Knee Stemmed Tibial Baseplate and Stem Extension possible. The internal diameters grow larger with each implant size, and all feature cement pockets to enhance the stability of the eventual TKA construct. The cone implants also feature 12mm wide relief slots to accept the fins/keel of the Freedom Knee Tibial Baseplate.
The AP and ML sides of the cone implants (which contact the metaphyseal bone) feature a 1mm thick proprietary scaffold structure. This structure, only possible via the additive manufacturing process, is designed to mimic the size and porosity of cancellous bone. The implant is comprised of Ti6Al4V ELI metal certified to ASTM F3001 and is manufactured with significant surface roughness to further add to the hydrophilic nature of the implant.
| Intended Use/Indications for Use | 21 CFR 807.92(a)(5) |
| --- | --- |
Page 1 of 2
{5}
Page 2 of 2
The Freedom® Total Knee System is indicated for the following:
- Severe knee joint pain, loss of mobility, and disability due to: rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis, traumatic arthritis, polyarthritis.
- Correction of functional deformities.
- Post-traumatic loss of knee joint contour, particularly when there is patellofemoral erosion, dysfunction, or prior patellectomy.
- Moderate valgus, varus, or flexion trauma.
- Knee fractures untreatable by other methods.
- Revision surgery where sufficient bone stock and soft tissue integrity are present (For PCK Components, and Primary PCK Components, and Metaphyseal Cones only).
The Freedom Porous Tibial Base Plate, and Cementless Femoral Components, and Metaphyseal Cones are indicated for Cemented or Uncemented use. All other components are indicated for cemented use only.
The Freedom Metaphyseal Cones are additionally indicated for use in addressing tibial bone voids and/or metaphyseal reconstruction.
## Indications for Use Comparison
21 CFR 807.92(a)(5)
The subject device serves very similar indications for use as the Triathlon Tritanium Cone Augments, though the subject device is not indicated for femoral use and the Freedom Knee System is not indicated for fractures or severe degeneration/trauma.
## Technological Comparison
21 CFR 807.92(a)(6)
Manufacturing comparison to the primary predicate device, Triathlon Tritanium Cone Augments, was not completed as the manufacturing processes are assumed to be different. Instead, the subject device was compared to the secondary predicate Freedom® Total Knee System - Porous Tibial Base Plate.
The subject device is manufactured by the same vendor who manufactures the predicate Freedom® Total Knee System - Porous Tibial Base Plate. There is only one key difference between the two systems, the predicate system requires additional CNC machining operations (and additional contact materials) not needed for the subject device. All manufacturing processes and contact materials experienced by the subject device are identical to those completed on the predicate device; the subject device does not introduce any new or different contact materials. Thus, while the predicate device requires additional manufacturing operations and contact materials, the subject device is considered to be substantially equivalent with regards to the manufacturing process.
## Non-Clinical and/or Clinical Tests Summary & Conclusions
21 CFR 807.92(b)
A cadaveric simulation was completed to validate the User Needs and Functional Requirements of the Freedom Metaphyseal Cones, including the implants and instrumentation.
An evaluation of the subject device with regards to mechanical performance was completed. This included mechanical testing of the scaffold structure, comparison to previously completed ASTM F1800 dynamic fatigue testing, and a comparative cross-section analysis of the solid body portion of the subject device in comparison to the primary predicate device.
An evaluation of the subject device with regards to biocompatibility was completed. Since the subject device follows the same manufacturing steps as the predicate Freedom® Total Knee System - Porous Tibial Base Plate (not including machine operations), does not introduce any new contact materials, is comprised of the same base material, and features a smaller volume of lattice structure with a more favorable geometry for cleaning material access, the subject device is considered to fall within the scope of previously completed cleaning and biocompatibility assessments.
An evaluation of the subject device with regards to sterilization and sterile packaging was completed. Since the packaging component materials and sealing methods are identical and the subject device is not larger, heavier, or containing any other risk factors pertaining to sterile packaging (sharp edges, etc.), the subject device falls within the scope of previously completed sterilization and sterile packaging validations. In addition, since the base material (Ti6Al4V ELI) is known to not degrade over time, the subject device similarly falls within the scope of previously completed shelf life validations.
The subject device was thoroughly vetted for performance and safety. A mechanical evaluation provided to support substantial equivalence between the subject and predicate devices. The subject device was found to fall within the scope of critical biocompatibility testing completed on the secondary predicate device Freedom® Total Knee System - Porous Tibial Base Plate. Similarly, the subject device falls within the scope of previously completed sterilization, sterile packaging, and shelf life evaluations. Finally, the subject device and corresponding instrumentation were found to satisfy the user needs of qualified surgeon users via cadaveric simulation. In summary, the subject device is found to be verified and validated as safe and effective as the predicate device.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.