The ADNI dataset was used to validate the performance of the Alzevita algorithm for automated hippocampal segmentation and volumetric measurement against a consensus ground truth.
Training dataset: 200 cases acquired using 1.5T MRI scanners.
>1 (expert radiologists)
ADNI 1 & ADNI 3 dataset: 298 subjects.
3 (certified radiologists)
Indications for Use
Alzevita is intended for use by neurologists and radiologists experienced in the interpretation and analysis of brain MRI scans. It enables automated labelling, visualization, and volumetric measurement of the hippocampus from high-resolution T1-weighted MRI images. The software facilitates comparison of hippocampal volume against a normative dataset derived from MRI scans of healthy control subjects aged 55 to 90 years, acquired using standardized imaging protocols on 1.5T/3T MRI scanners.
Device Story
Alzevita is a cloud-based, AI-powered SaMD for automated hippocampal segmentation and volumetric quantification from 3D T1-weighted brain MRI scans (DICOM/NIfTI). Operated by neurologists or radiologists via a secure web interface, it replaces manual segmentation workflows. The device uses a locked 3D U-Net++ deep learning model to process inputs and generate labeled segmentations and tabular volumetric reports. Clinicians use these outputs to evaluate structural brain changes, aiding in the assessment of neurodegenerative conditions. The device provides a standardized, reproducible analysis, potentially improving clinical decision-making efficiency and consistency.
Clinical Evidence
Analytical cross-sectional study using 298 retrospective cases from the ADNI dataset (independent of training data). Performance validated against a consensus ground truth (STAPLE algorithm) derived from three radiologists. Results: Mean Dice coefficient 0.86 (95% CI: 0.85-0.86), mean Hausdorff distance 1.51 mm (95% CI: 1.43-1.59 mm). Subgroup analyses across clinical status (Control, MCI, AD), gender, field strength (1.5T/3T), and slice thickness confirmed robustness, with all Dice scores >0.83 and Hausdorff distances <3 mm. No significant discrepancies found between radiologist segmentations and consensus ground truth (p > 0.05).
Technological Characteristics
Cloud-based SaMD; 3D U-Net++ deep learning architecture; locked algorithm. Compatible with standard web browsers and off-the-shelf hardware. Inputs: 3D T1-weighted MRI (DICOM/NIfTI). Outputs: Volumetric measurements and labeled segmentations. Automated quality control for scan protocol verification.
Indications for Use
Indicated for neurologists and radiologists analyzing brain MRI scans of patients aged 55-90 years to assist in hippocampal volumetric assessment.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A medical image management and processing system is a device that provides one or more capabilities relating to the review and digital processing of medical images for the purposes of interpretation by a trained practitioner of disease detection, diagnosis, or patient management. The software components may provide advanced or complex image processing functions for image manipulation, enhancement, or quantification that are intended for use in the interpretation and analysis of medical images. Advanced image manipulation functions may include image segmentation, multimodality image registration, or 3D visualization. Complex quantitative functions may include semi-automated measurements or time-series measurements.
Special Controls
*Classification.* Class II (special controls; voluntary standards—Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) Std., Joint Photographic Experts Group (JPEG) Std., Society of Motion Picture and Television Engineers (SMPTE) Test Pattern).
{0}
FDA
U.S. FOOD & DRUG
ADMINISTRATION
December 19, 2025
Topia MedTech Limited
Akshay Sojitra, Director
14 Havelock Place (MS)
Harrow, London HA11LJ
United Kingdom
Re: K252670
Trade/Device Name: Alzevita
Regulation Number: 21 CFR 892.2050
Regulation Name: Medical Image Management And Processing System
Regulatory Class: Class II
Product Code: QIH
Dated: November 3, 2025
Received: November 3, 2025
Dear Akshay Sojitra:
We have reviewed your section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database available at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
{1}
K252670 - Akshay Sojitra
Page 2
Additional information about changes that may require a new premarket notification are provided in the FDA guidance documents entitled "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99812/download) and "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Software Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99785/download).
Your device is also subject to, among other requirements, the Quality System (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820), which includes, but is not limited to, 21 CFR 820.30, Design controls; 21 CFR 820.90, Nonconforming product; and 21 CFR 820.100, Corrective and preventive action. Please note that regardless of whether a change requires premarket review, the QS regulation requires device manufacturers to review and approve changes to device design and production (21 CFR 820.30 and 21 CFR 820.70) and document changes and approvals in the device master record (21 CFR 820.181).
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR Part 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reporting-combination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR Parts 1000-1050.
All medical devices, including Class I and unclassified devices and combination product device constituent parts are required to be in compliance with the final Unique Device Identification System rule ("UDI Rule"). The UDI Rule requires, among other things, that a device bear a unique device identifier (UDI) on its label and package (21 CFR 801.20(a)) unless an exception or alternative applies (21 CFR 801.20(b)) and that the dates on the device label be formatted in accordance with 21 CFR 801.18. The UDI Rule (21 CFR 830.300(a) and 830.320(b)) also requires that certain information be submitted to the Global Unique Device Identification Database (GUDID) (21 CFR Part 830 Subpart E). For additional information on these requirements, please see the UDI System webpage at https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance/unique-device-identification-system-udi-system.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reporting-mdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about medical devices and radiation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-
{2}
K252670 - Akshay Sojitra
Page 3
assistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,

Daniel M. Krainak, PhD
Assistant Director
DHT8C: Division of Radiological
Imaging and Radiation Therapy Devices
OHT8: Office of Radiological Health
Office of Product Evaluation and Quality
Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{3}
FORM FDA 3881 (8/23)
Page 1 of 1
PSC Publishing Services (301) 443-6740
EF
| DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Food and Drug Administration Indications for Use | Form Approved: OMB No. 0910-0120 Expiration Date: 07/31/2026 See PRA Statement below. |
| --- | --- |
| 510(k) Number (if known) K252670 | |
| Device Name Alzevita | |
| Indications for Use (Describe) Alzevita is intended for use by neurologists and radiologists experienced in the interpretation and analysis of brain MRI scans. It enables automated labelling, visualization, and volumetric measurement of the hippocampus from high-resolution T1-weighted MRI images. The software facilitates comparison of hippocampal volume against a normative dataset derived from MRI scans of healthy control subjects aged 55 to 90 years, acquired using standardized imaging protocols on 1.5T/3T MRI scanners. | |
| Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable) ☑ Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) ☐ Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C) | |
| CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED. | |
| This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.* | |
| The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to: Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov | |
| "An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number." | |
{4}
TOPIA MED TECH
K252670
info@topiamedtech.com
www.topiamedtech.com
| Alzevita 510(k) Premarket Submission | |
| --- | --- |
| Revision: 03 | Date: DEC 19,2025 |
# 510(k) Summary
## I. Submitter
| Name | TOPIA MEDTECH LIMITED |
| --- | --- |
| Address | 14 Havelock Place (MS), Harrow, United Kingdom, HA11LJ |
| Contact Person | Akshay Sojitra |
| Telephone Number | +44 2081530878 |
| Email | regulatory@topiamedtech.com |
## II. Device
| Device Trade Name | Alzevita |
| --- | --- |
| Common Name | Medical Image Processing Software |
| Classification Name | Medical Image Management and Processing System |
| Regulation Number | 21 CFR 892.2050 |
| Regulation Description | Picture Archiving and Communications System |
| Product Code | QIH |
| Classification Panel | Radiology |
## III. Predicate Device
| Device | NEUROShield |
| --- | --- |
| 510(k) Number | K220034 |
| Manufacturer | In Med Prognostics L3C |
| Product Code | LLZ |
TOPIA MEDTECH LIMITED
14 HAVELOCK PLACE (MS), HARROW, UNITED KINGDOM HA1 1LJ
{5}
TOPIA MED TECH
info@topiamedtech.com
www.topiamedtech.com
## IV. Device Description
Alzevita is a cloud-based, AI-powered medical image processing software as a medical device intended to assist neurologists and radiologists with expertise in the analysis of 3D brain MRI scans. The software performs fully automated segmentation and volumetric quantification of the hippocampus, a brain structure involved in memory and commonly affected by neurodegenerative conditions.
Alzevita is designed to replace manual hippocampal segmentation workflows with a fast, reproducible, and standardized process. It provides quantitative measurements of hippocampal volume, enabling consistent outputs that can assist healthcare professionals in evaluating structural brain changes.
The software operates through a secure web interface and is compatible with commonly used operating systems and browsers. It accepts 3D MRI scans in DICOM or NIfTI format and displays the MRI image in the MRI viewer allowing trained healthcare professionals to view, zoom, and analyze the MRI scan alongside providing a visual and tabular volumetric analysis report.
The underlying algorithm used in Alzevita is locked, meaning it does not modify its behavior at runtime or adapt to new inputs. This ensures consistent performance and reproducibility of results across users and imaging conditions. Any future modifications to the algorithm including performance updates or model re-training will be submitted to the FDA for review and clearance prior to deployment, in compliance with FDA regulatory requirements and applicable guidance for AI/ML-based SaMD.
## V. Indications for Use
Alzevita is intended for use by neurologists and radiologists experienced in the interpretation and analysis of brain MRI scans. It enables automated labelling, visualization, and volumetric measurement of the hippocampus from high-resolution T1-weighted MRI images. The software facilitates comparison of hippocampal volume against a normative dataset derived from MRI scans of healthy control subjects aged 55 to 90 years, acquired using standardized imaging protocols on 1.5T/3T MRI scanners.
## VI. Comparison of Technological Characteristics with the Predicate Device
| Details | Subject Device | Predicate Device | Remark |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Name of Manufacturer | TOPIA MEDTECH LIMITED | In Med Prognostics L3C | - |
| Address of Submitter | 14 Havelock Place (MS), Harrow, United Kingdom, HA11LJ | 4918 September Street, San Diego, CA 92110, USA | - |
| Brand Name | Alzevita | NEUROShield | - |
| 510 (K) Number | K252670 | K220034 | - |
| Generic Name | Medical Image Processing Software | Medical Image Processing software | Equivalent |
| Classification | Class II | Class II | Equivalent |
| Classification Product Code | QIH | LLZ | Substantially Equivalent |
| Intended Use | Alzevita is intended for use by neurologists and radiologists | The NEUROShield medical image processing software is intended for | Substantially Equivalent |
TOPIA MEDTECH LIMITED
14 HAVELOCK PLACE (MS), HARROW, UNITED KINGDOM HA1 1LJ
{6}
TOPIA
MED TECH
info@topiamedtech.com
www.topiamedtech.com
| | experienced in the interpretation and analysis of brain MRI scans. It enables automated labelling, visualization, and volumetric measurement of the hippocampus from high-resolution T1-weighted MRI images. The software facilitates comparison of hippocampal volume against a normative dataset derived from MRI scans of healthy control subjects aged 55 to 90 years, acquired using standardized imaging protocols on 1.5T/3T MRI scanners. | automatic labelling, visualization, and volumetric quantification of the Hippocampus brain structure from a set of MR images | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Design and Incorporated Technology | • A Software as a Medical Device (SaMD) designed for imaging and quantitative analysis of the hippocampal brain structure from MRI scans.
• It is a fully automated, geometry-based brain analytics tool and cloud platform developed using advanced 3D U-Net++ methodologies | • Software as a medical device to be used in the process of Imaging and quantification of the Hippocampus brain structure from a set of MR images
• Fully automated brain geometry - based quantifying analytics tool/cloud platform developed using DeepNet / U-Net methodologies | Substantially Equivalent |
| Physical Characteristics | • Software Package (Accessible via Web Browser)
• Operates on off the shelf hardware (multiple vendors) | • Software Package (Accessible via Web Browser)
• Operates on off the shelf hardware (multiple vendors) | Equivalent |
| Supported Operating Systems | Supports Linux, Windows and Mac OS latest | Supports Windows and Mac OS latest | Equivalent |
| Data Source | Alzevita requires compressed DICOM files or NIFTI files as Input | NEUROShield requires uncompressed DICOM files as input | Equivalent |
| Output | Software provides volumetric measurements of Hippocampus brain structures | Provides volumetric measurements of Hippocampus brain structures | Equivalent |
| Safety | • Automated quality control functions - Scan protocol verification
• Results must be reviewed by a trained clinicians/ Radiologist/ Neurologist | • Automated quality control functions - Scan protocol verification
• Results must be reviewed by a trained clinicians/ Radiologist/ Neurologist | Equivalent |
# VII. Performance Testing
TOPIA MEDTECH LIMITED
14 HAVELOCK PLACE (MS), HARROW, UNITED KINGDOM HA1 1LJ
{7}
TOPIA
MED TECH
info@topiamedtech.com
www.topiamedtech.com
Alzevita is a deep learning algorithm-based device. This algorithm is developed by training the Deep Learning based 3D U-Net++ model with the help of the training data.
# Specifications of the Training dataset
Data is collected from India, between May 2024 to July 2025. The training dataset, consisting of 200 cases, is meticulously curated by considering various factors such as image variance, and quality. All cases are acquired using a 1.5 Tesla MRI scanner. Expert radiologists manually segmented the hippocampus to create the ground truth, which is then used as input for training the Alzevita segmentation model.
Table 1 presents the distribution of subjects based on key imaging and demographic parameters.
| Subgroups | | Count |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Magnetic field strength | 1.5T | 200 |
| Slice thickness | 1 | 200 |
| Equipment | GE | 200 |
| Gender | Male | 110 |
| | Female | 90 |
# Validation Study:
The performance of Alzevita is evaluated by a validation study summarized as follows:
# A. Data Description
The performance validation dataset is collected from the publicly available ADNI (Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative) dataset. This dataset is independent of the training data and is not used to develop Alzevita's algorithm.
Data Size: 298 subjects
Study Type: Analytical & Cross-Sectional
Data collection type: Retrospective
Data Sampling: Stratified Random Sampling
Recruitment factors: ADNI 1 & ADNI 3 dataset (Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative)
MRI Equipment manufacturers: GE medical systems, Philips medical systems, Siemens Healthineers
Magnetic Field Strength: 1.5T and 3T
MRI Sequences/ protocol: 3D T1 MPRAGE
Slice thickness: 1, 1.2
- Approximately equal geographical distribution in USA: East coast, Central US regions, West coast and Canada
The distribution for age bands is as follows:
TOPIA MEDTECH LIMITED
14 HAVELOCK PLACE (MS), HARROW, UNITED KINGDOM HA1 1LJ
{8}
TOPIA
MED TECH
info@topiamedtech.com
www.topiamedtech.com
The mean age of subjects is found to be $76 \pm 7$ years.
| Age group | Count |
| --- | --- |
| 55-64 | 20 |
| 65-69 | 37 |
| 70-74 | 74 |
| 75-79 | 82 |
| 80-84 | 58 |
| 85-90 | 27 |
The table below provides the categorization of subjects according to selection criteria:
| Subgroups | | Count | Mean (mL) | Standard deviation (mL) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Clinical Sub- groups | ADNI-control | 132 | 7.0 | 1.0 |
| | ADNI-MCI | 103 | 5.6 | 1.3 |
| | ADNI-AD | 63 | 4.9 | 0.9 |
| Gender | Male | 150 | 5.8 | 1.3 |
| | Female | 148 | 6.4 | 1.4 |
| Magnetic field strength | 1.5T | 128 | 5.5 | 1.3 |
| | 3T | 170 | 6.05 | 1.1 |
| Slice thickness | 1 | 126 | 6.9 | 1.3 |
| | 1.2 | 172 | 5.6 | 1.3 |
| Region | East USA | 133 | 6.1 | 1.4 |
| | West USA | 56 | 6.2 | 1.5 |
| | Central USA | 90 | 6.2 | 1.4 |
| | Canada | 19 | 6.3 | 1.5 |
TOPIA MEDTECH LIMITED
14 HAVELOCK PLACE (MS), HARROW, UNITED KINGDOM HA1 1LJ
{9}
TOPIA MED TECH
info@topiamedtech.com
www.topiamedtech.com
## B. Ground Truth
i. A consensus ground truth is established through manual segmentation of MRI brain scans from 298 subjects. This task is performed by three certified radiologists in India, adhering to widely recognized and standardized segmentation protocols. The individual delineations are subsequently integrated into a single consensus mask for each case utilizing the STAPLE (Simultaneous Truth and Performance Level Estimation) algorithm. The reliability and accuracy of the consensus ground truth are statistically validated by comparing it with the individual segmentations done by the radiologists.
ii. The Alzevita algorithm performed automated segmentation of the hippocampal brain structure across all subjects, generating labelled segmentations with precise anatomical markings and calculating hippocampal volumes using advanced algorithmic techniques.
## C. Statistical Analysis
Ground Truth Validation: Using the Dice coefficient, and Hausdorff distance, the STAPLE-derived ground truth (via ITK-SNAP) is validated through comparison with segmentations from three radiologists. Statistical analysis indicated no significant discrepancies (p > 0.05) between these individual segmentations and the consensus ground truth, thereby substantiating the consistency of the radiologist annotations and the reliability of the ground truth itself.
i. Geometric comparison of Alzevita with Ground Truth: An evaluation of Alzevita's automated hippocampus segmentations is conducted by comparing them to the STAPLE-derived ground truth, utilizing Dice scores and Hausdorff distance as quantitative measures. The algorithm's performance met the established criteria for both metrics, signifying a high level of geometric correspondence with the annotations provided by expert radiologists.
ii. Quantitative Volume Comparison: A comparison is made between hippocampal volumes derived from the STAPLE ground truth and those generated by Alzevita. Utilizing correlation analysis, Bland-Altman (BA) plots, and relative volume difference, Alzevita successfully met the criteria across all three statistical evaluation methods, demonstrating strong agreement between the hippocampal volumes computed by Alzevita and those derived from the STAPLE consensus ground truth.
iii. Pass/Fail criteria: The Alzevita algorithm met all predefined performance thresholds, demonstrating its accuracy and reliability in hippocampal segmentation and volume estimation:
- Dice Score: ≥ 75%
- Hausdorff Distance: ≤ 6.1 mm
- Correlation Coefficient: ≥ 0.82
- Relative Volume Difference: ≤ 24.6%
- Bland-Altman Mean Difference (Total Hippocampus Volume): ≤ 1010 mm³
These results validate the robustness of the algorithm's automated segmentation and volume computation capabilities.
TOPIA MEDTECH LIMITED
14 HAVELOCK PLACE (MS), HARROW, UNITED KINGDOM HA1 1LJ
{10}
TOPIA MED TECH
info@topiamedtech.com
www.topiamedtech.com
iv. Subgroup Error Analysis: Subgroup analyses are conducted across variations such as magnetic field strength, gender, slice thickness, clinical subgroups, and geographic regions within the U.S. In all cases, Dice scores exceeded 83%, and Hausdorff distances remained below 3 mm, indicating consistently high segmentation accuracy. Additionally, Alzevita met the criteria for both correlation and relative volume difference across all subgroups, demonstrating robustness and generalizability of the model.
# D. Results
i. The average dice coefficient and Hausdorff distance is found to be 0.86 and 1.51 mm respectively. The following table shows the 95% confidence interval for both.
| Measure | Threshold | Alzevita 95 % confidence intervals | Criteria (Pass/Fail) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Dice | 0.75 | (0.85, 0.86) | Pass |
| Hausdorff distance | 6.1 | (1.43, 1.59) | Pass |
ii. The outcomes of subgroup error analysis are as follows:
a) Clinical subgroups
| | Dice Score | | | Hausdorff Distance (mm) | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Clinical subgroups | Control | MCI | AD | Control | MCI | AD |
| Measured value | 0.88 | 0.85 | 0.83 | 1.36 | 1.53 | 1.79 |
| Alzevita 95 % confidence intervals | (0.87, 0.88) | (0.84, 0.85) | (0.82, 0.84) | (1.32, 1.41) | (1.44, 1.62) | (1.48, 2.10) |
| Criteria | Pass | Pass | Pass | Pass | Pass | Pass |
TOPIA MEDTECH LIMITED
14 HAVELOCK PLACE (MS), HARROW, UNITED KINGDOM HA1 1LJ
{11}
TOPIA MED TECH
info@topiamedtech.com
www.topiamedtech.com
b) Gender
| | Dice score | | Hausdorff Distance (mm) | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Gender | Female | Male | Female | Male |
| Measured value | 0.86 | 0.85 | 1.48 | 1.54 |
| Alzevita 95 % confidence intervals | (0.85, 0.87) | (0.84, 0.86) | (1.40, 1.57) | (1.41, 1.66) |
| Criteria | Pass | Pass | Pass | Pass |
c) Magnetic field strength
| | Dice score | | Hausdorff Distance (mm) | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| MRI strength | 3T | 1.5T | 3T | 1.5T |
| Measured value | 0.87 | 0.84 | 1.43 | 1.62 |
| Alzevita 95 % confidence intervals | (0.86, 0.87) | (0.83, 0.85) | (1.38, 1.47) | (1.45, 1.79) |
| Criteria | Pass | Pass | Pass | Pass |
d) Slice Thickness
| | Dice score | | Hausdorff Distance (mm) | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Slice thickness | 1 mm | 1.2mm | 1 mm | 1.2mm |
| Average value | 0.87 | 0.84 | 1.39 | 1.60 |
| Alzevita 95 % confidence intervals | (0.87, 0.88) | (0.84, 0.85) | (1.35, 1.43) | (1.47, 1.72) |
| Criteria | Pass | Pass | Pass | Pass |
TOPIA MEDTECH LIMITED
14 HAVELOCK PLACE (MS), HARROW, UNITED KINGDOM HA1 1LJ
{12}
TOPIA
MED TECH
info@topiamedtech.com
www.topiamedtech.com
e) US Geographical Region
| | Dice score | | | | Hausdorff Distance (mm) | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Region | East US | West US | Central US | Canada | East US | West US | Central US | Canada |
| Average value | 0.85 | 0.86 | 0.86 | 0.85 | 1.57 | 1.45 | 1.41 | 1.71 |
| Alzevita 95 % confidence intervals | (0.84,0.86) | (0.85, 0.87) | (0.85, 0.87) | (0.82, 0.88) | (1.44,1.71) | (1.35,1.55) | (1.35, 1.47) | (1.07, 2.34) |
| Criteria | Pass | Pass | Pass | Pass | Pass | Pass | Pass | Pass |
Performance analysis of Alzevita for hippocampus segmentation revealed consistently strong results, with overall Dice scores surpassing 83% and Hausdorff distances remaining under 3 mm. Such outcomes affirm the algorithm's high accuracy and reliability, substantiating its precision in both structural correspondence and relative hippocampal volume assessment.
VIII. Conclusions
The evaluation provides objective evidence supporting the reliability, accuracy, and reproducibility of Alzevita for automated hippocampal segmentation. Validation and performance testing demonstrate that the device meets predefined acceptance criteria for its intended use in clinical neuroimaging workflows. The results support the device's suitability for use by qualified healthcare professionals in the assessment of neurological structures. Furthermore, Alzevita has been demonstrated to be substantially equivalent to its predicate device, NEUROShield (K220034), with respect to intended use, technological characteristics, and performance.
TOPIA MEDTECH LIMITED
14 HAVELOCK PLACE (MS), HARROW, UNITED KINGDOM HA1 1LJ
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.