The Calcitonin immunoassay is intended for the in vitro quantitative determination of human calcitonin (thyrocalcitonin) in serum and plasma. The calcitonin determination is intended to be used as an aid in the diagnosis and treatment of diseases involving the thyroid and parathyroid glands, including carcinoma and hyperparathyroidism in conjunction with other clinical and laboratory findings. The electrochemiluminescence immunoassay “ECLIA” is intended for use on cobas e immunoassay analyzer.
Device Story
Elecsys Calcitonin is an in vitro diagnostic immunoassay for quantitative measurement of human calcitonin in serum/plasma; used on cobas e 411 analyzer. Principle: sandwich electrochemiluminescence immunoassay (ECLIA). Input: 50 μL patient sample; biotinylated monoclonal hCT-specific antibody; ruthenium-labeled monoclonal hCT-specific antibody; streptavidin-coated microparticles. Process: formation of sandwich complex; magnetic capture of microparticles on electrode surface; voltage application induces chemiluminescent emission measured by photomultiplier. Output: calcitonin concentration (pg/mL) determined via calibration curve. Used in clinical laboratories by trained personnel. Results assist clinicians in diagnosing/treating thyroid/parathyroid disorders. Benefits: improved biotin tolerance (up to 1200 ng/mL) compared to predicate; aids in clinical decision-making for thyroid carcinoma/hyperparathyroidism management.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical studies performed. Evidence consists of analytical performance testing: precision (repeatability/intermediate precision), linearity (1-2,000 pg/mL), analytical specificity (endogenous/exogenous interference), cross-reactivity, and method comparison against predicate (N=120, r=0.996).
Technological Characteristics
Sandwich ECLIA; biotinylated monoclonal antibody and ruthenium-labeled monoclonal antibody; streptavidin-coated microparticles; magnetic capture; chemiluminescent detection. Measuring range 1-2000 pg/mL. Standardized to IRP WHO Reference Standard 89/620. Biotin tolerance up to 1200 ng/mL. Compatible with cobas e immunoassay analyzers.
Indications for Use
Indicated for in vitro quantitative determination of human calcitonin in serum and plasma to aid in diagnosis and treatment of thyroid and parathyroid gland diseases, including carcinoma and hyperparathyroidism. For prescription use only.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A calcitonin test system is a device intended to measure the thyroid hormone calcitonin (thyrocalcitonin) levels in plasma and serum. Calcitonin measurements are used in the diagnosis and treatment of diseases involving the thyroid and parathyroid glands, including carcinoma and hyperparathyroidism (excessive activity of the parathyroid gland).
{0}
FDA
U.S. FOOD & DRUG
ADMINISTRATION
# 510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION DECISION SUMMARY
ASSAY ONLY
## I Background Information:
A 510(k) Number
K252431
B Applicant
Roche Diagnostics GmbH
C Proprietary and Established Names
Elecsys Calcitonin
D Regulatory Information
| Product Code(s) | Classification | Regulation Section | Panel |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| JKR | Class II | 21 CFR 862.1140 - Calcitonin Test System | CH - Clinical Chemistry |
## II Submission/Device Overview:
A Purpose for Submission:
Modified device
B Measurand:
Calcitonin
C Type of Test:
Quantitative, Electrochemiluminescence Immunoassay (ECLIA)
Food and Drug Administration
10903 New Hampshire Avenue
Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
www.fda.gov
{1}
K252431 - Page 2 of 10
# III Intended Use/Indications for Use:
## A Intended Use(s):
See Indications for Use below.
## B Indication(s) for Use:
The Calcitonin immunoassay is intended for the in vitro quantitative determination of human calcitonin (thyrocalcitonin) in serum and plasma. The calcitonin determination is intended to be used as an aid in the diagnosis and treatment of diseases involving the thyroid and parathyroid glands, including carcinoma and hyperparathyroidism in conjunction with other clinical and laboratory findings.
The electrochemiluminescence immunoassay “ECLIA” is intended for use on cobas e immunoassay analyzer.
## C Special Conditions for Use Statement(s):
Rx - For Prescription Use Only
## D Special Instrument Requirements:
cobas e 411 analyzer
# IV Device/System Characteristics:
## A Device Description:
The Elecsys Calcitonin consists of the following:
The Elecsys Calcitonin reagents “M”, “R1” and “R2” are combined in the reagent rackpack, which is a bundle of the three reagent bottles, which is placed on the instrument as a single unit. The reagent rackpack is labeled as hCT.
- M Streptavidin-coated microparticles (transparent cap), 1 bottle, 6.5 mL: Streptavidin-coated microparticles 0.72 mg/mL; preservative.
- R1 Anti-hCT-Ab~biotin (gray cap), 1 bottle, 8 mL: Biotinylated monoclonal anti-hCT antibody (mouse) 1.50 mg/L; phosphate buffer 100 mmol/L, pH 7.2; preservative.
- R2 Anti-hCT-Ab~Ru(bpy)²⁺₃ (black cap), 1 bottle, 8 mL: Monoclonal anti-hCT antibody (mouse) labeled with ruthenium complex 1.0 mg/L; phosphate buffer 100 mmol/L, pH 7.2; preservative.
## B Principle of Operation:
Elecsys Calcitonin is a sandwich principle assay with a total duration of 18 minutes including the following steps:
1st Incubation: 50 μL of sample, a biotinylated monoclonal hCT-specific antibody and a monoclonal hCT-specific antibody labeled with a ruthenium complex react to form a sandwich complex. The presence of a scavenger antibody depletes free, unconjugated biotin present in the sample.
{2}
$2^{\mathrm{nd}}$ Incubation: After addition of streptavidin-coated microparticles, the complex becomes bound to the solid phase via interaction of biotin and streptavidin.
The reaction mixture is aspirated into the measuring cell where the microparticles are magnetically captured onto the surface of the electrode. Unbound substances are then removed with ProCell/ProCell M. Application of a voltage to the electrode then induces chemiluminescent emission which is measured by a photomultiplier.
Results are determined via a calibration curve which is instrument-specifically generated by 2-point calibration and a master curve provided via the reagent barcode.
# V Substantial Equivalence Information:
A Predicate Device Name(s):
Elecsys Calcitonin Immunoassay
B Predicate 510(k) Number(s):
K132828
C Comparison with Predicate(s):
| Device & Predicate Device(s): | K252431 | K132828 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Device Trade Name | Elecsys Calcitonin | Elecsys Calcitonin Immunoassay |
| General Device Characteristic Similarities | | |
| Intended Use/Indications For Use | Immunoassay for the in vitro quantitative determination of human calcitonin (thyrocalcitonin) in serum and plasma. | Same |
| Traceability | Traceable to WHO 2nd IRP 89/620 | Same |
| General Device Characteristic Differences | | |
| Biotin tolerance | ≤ 1200 ng/mL | ≤ 40 ng/mL |
# VI Standards/Guidance Documents Referenced:
CLSI EP05-A3, Evaluation of Precision of Quantitative Measurement Procedures; Approved Guideline - Third Edition
CLSI EP06-Ed2, Evaluation of Linearity of Quantitative Measurement Procedures, 2nd Edition
CLSI EP07-Ed3, Interference Testing in Clinical Chemistry
K252431 - Page 3 of 10
{3}
CLSI EP17-A2, Evaluation of Detection Capability for Clinical Laboratory Measurement Procedures; Approved Guideline-2nd Edition
CLSI EP09c-Ed3, Measurement Procedure Comparison and Bias Estimation Using Patient Samples
## VII Performance Characteristics (if/when applicable):
## A Analytical Performance:
1. Precision/Reproducibility:
Precision was evaluated on one cobas e 411 analyzer with one reagent lot. The protocol consisted of testing two replicates of five human serum samples and each of the levels of control, PreciControl Varia. The sample types tested were native sample pools (S1 - S2) and spiked sample pools (S3 - S5). The protocol consisted of testing two replicates per run for each control and sample, two runs per day over 21 days using one reagent lot. Repeatability and intermediate precision were calculated according to CLSI EP05-A3.
| Sample | n | Mean (pg/mL) | Repeatability | | Intermediate Precision | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | | SD (pg/mL) | CV (%) | SD (pg/mL) | CV (%) |
| Sample 1 | 84 | 1.02 | 0.080 | 7.9 | 0.120 | 11.8 |
| Sample 2 | 84 | 10.2 | 0.261 | 2.5 | 0.466 | 4.6 |
| Sample 3 | 84 | 62.1 | 1.91 | 3.1 | 2.95 | 4.7 |
| Sample 4 | 84 | 905 | 21.8 | 2.4 | 41.3 | 4.6 |
| Sample 5 | 84 | 1882 | 83.0 | 4.4 | 107 | 5.7 |
| Control 1 | 84 | 9.35 | 0.197 | 2.1 | 0.391 | 4.2 |
| Control 2 | 84 | 84.5 | 1.93 | 2.3 | 3.23 | 3.8 |
A reproducibility study was performed using repeated measurements of five human serum pools (HSP) and two control levels of PreciControl Varia. Data were collected at two external sites, each using one reagent lot, and one internal site using three reagent lots. 25-repeated measurements were performed for each sample appearing in a combination of sample (concentration level, site and lot) with five repetitions per day for five days on a cobas e 411 analyzer. Testing was completed at all three sites for a total $N = 125$ per sample. The data were analyzed for reproducibility and are summarized below. Data calculation was performed according to CLSI EP05-A3.
| | | | Reproducibility | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Sample | N | Mean (pg/mL) | SD (pg/mL) | CV (%) |
| Sample 1 | 125 | 1.48 | 0.185 | 12.5 |
| Sample 2 | 125 | 10.2 | 0.367 | 3.59 |
| Sample 3 | 125 | 54.0 | 2.21 | 4.10 |
| Sample 4 | 125 | 1035 | 40.8 | 3.94 |
K252431 - Page 4 of 10
{4}
| | | | Reproducibility | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Sample | N | Mean (pg/mL) | SD (pg/mL) | CV (%) |
| Sample 5 | 125 | 1856 | 61.4 | 3.31 |
| Control 1 | 125 | 9.35 | 0.309 | 3.31 |
| Control 2 | 125 | 88.7 | 2.82 | 3.18 |
2. Linearity:
A linearity study was conducted according to CLSI EP06-2nd edition. A total of 9 levels of serum samples ranging from 0.312 to 2015 pg/mL were prepared by mixing different proportions of a native serum sample containing a high concentration of calcitonin with a native serum sample containing a low concentration of calcitonin. Samples were run in 4 replicates in a single run. Samples were tested on one cobas e411 analyzer using 3 reagent lots. The data were analyzed using a weighted linear regression model. The deviation from linearity did not exceed 4.2% for concentrations within the measuring interval. The results support the claimed measuring interval of 1 – 2,000 pg/mL.
Dilution:
The sponsor conducted a study to demonstrate that samples with calcitonin concentrations above the measuring range and up to 200,000 pg/mL can be diluted with Diluent MultiAssay; the recommended dilution is 1:100.
3. Analytical Specificity/Interference:
Endogenous interference
Potential interference from endogenous substances was evaluated per CLSI EP07 Ed 03. For each potential interferent, samples with calcitonin concentration at around 8, 1000 and 1500 pg/mL were measured in the presence of interferent at 11 interferent concentrations and with control samples (with no interferent added). Percent recovery at each concentration was calculated as the mean value of 5 replicates at that concentration compared to the control sample. The endogenous interference effects on analyte quantitation are summarized in the table below:
Endogenous Substances
| Substance | Highest concentration tested that did not cause significant interference |
| --- | --- |
| Bilirubin | 66 mg/dL |
| Hemoglobin | 200 mg/dL |
| Intralipid | 2,000 mg/dL |
| Biotin | 1,200 ng/mL |
| Rheumatoid factor | 1,200 IU/mL |
| IgG | 4 g/dL |
| IgA | 0.7 g/dL |
| IgM | 0.4 g/dL |
Exogenous interference
Potential interference from exogenous substances was evaluated per CLSI EP07 Ed 03. To assess drug interference on the measurement of calcitonin, potentially interfering drugs were spiked into two human serum sample pools and tested with the Elecsys Calcitonin assay on
K252431 - Page 5 of 10
{5}
the cobas e 411 analyzer. The analyte concentration of the sample pools were approximately 10 and 500 pg/mL Calcitonin (spiked). Each sample was measured in 5-fold determination. The mean % Recovery and absolute deviation were calculated when comparing the drug spiked portions to control samples (with no interferent added). At the following concentrations, the percent difference between the results of the spiked samples compared to the results of the control samples was less than ± 10.0%. The results are summarized in the table below:
| Drug | Highest concentration tested that did not cause significant interference |
| --- | --- |
| Acetaminophen | 156 mg/L |
| Acetylcysteine | 150 mg/L |
| Acetylsalicylic Acid | 30 mg/L |
| Ampicillin-Na | 75 mg/L |
| Ascorbic acid | 52.5 mg/L |
| Cyclosporine | 1.8 mg/L |
| Cefoxitin | 750 mg/L |
| Doxycycline | 18 mg/L |
| Heparin | 3300 IU/L |
| Ibuprofen | 219 mg/L |
| Itraconazol | 20 mg/L |
| Levodopa | 7.5 mg/L |
| Methyldopa +1.5 | 22.5 mg/L |
| Metronidazole | 123 mg/L |
| Phenylbutazone | 321 mg/L |
| Rifampicin | 48 mg/L |
| Theophylline | 60 mg/L |
| Special Thyroid Drugs | Highest concentration tested that did not cause significant interference |
| --- | --- |
| Iodide | 100 mg/L |
| Levothyroxine | 1.0 mg/L |
| Carbimazole | 30 mg/L |
| Thiamazole | 80 mg/L |
| Propylthiouracil | 60 mg/L |
| Perchlorate | 2000 mg/L |
| Propranolol | 240 mg/L |
| Amiodarone | 200 mg/L |
| Prednisolone | 100 mg/L |
| Hydrocortisone | 200 mg/L |
| Fluocortolone | 100 mg/L |
K252431 - Page 6 of 10
{6}
| Special Thyroid Drugs | Highest concentration tested that did not cause significant interference |
| --- | --- |
| Octreotide | 0.3 mg/L |
## Cross-Reactivity
A cross-reactivity study was conducted to evaluate the potential cross-reactivity of the assay. The potential cross-reactants were added at defined concentrations to a single native human serum pool sample with an approximate Calcitonin concentration of 8 pg/mL and analyzed with the Elecsys Calcitonin on the cobas e 411 analyzer. Samples were measured in the presence and absence of the potential cross-reactants and cross-reactivity (%) was calculated using the following equation: % Cross Reactivity = 100 x (Average “spike” concentration – Average “blank concentration) / Spike concentration of cross reactant
Results are summarized below.
| Cross-Reactant | Concentration Cross-Reactant [ng/mL] | Cross reactivity [%] |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Salmon Calcitonin | 200 | 0.000 |
| Porcine Calcitonin | 1000 | 0.000 |
| Chicken Calcitonin | 1000 | 0.000 |
| ACTH (1-39) human | 200 | 0.000 |
| C-Peptide | 80000 | 0.000 |
| Calcitonin Gene Related Peptide | 2000 | 0.000 |
| PTH (1-84) human | 300 | 0.000 |
| TSH | 2000 μIU/mL | 0.000 |
| Insulin | 67000 | 0.000 |
| Prolactin | 2000 | 0.000 |
| Gastrin I | 4000 | 0.000 |
| Elcatonin | 200000 | 0.000 |
| Katacalcin | 80000 | 0.000 |
## HAMA
The effect of the presence of human anti-mouse antibodies on the Elecsys Calcitonin was assessed on the cobas e 411 analyzer. Human serum samples were tested in two-fold determinations. Each sample was divided, with one part used as the control sample and the other part was spiked with HAMA. Testing with HAMA levels up to a concentration of 81 ng/mL showed < ±10 % bias. Testing with HAMA levels of 805 ng/mL, at calcitonin concentrations above 18 pg/mL, showed negative biases up to 20%.
## The labeling includes the following limitations:
For assays using antibodies, the possibility exists for interference by heterophile antibodies in the patient's sample. Patients who have been regularly exposed to animals or have received murine-derived immunotherapy or diagnostic procedures using murine immunoglobulin or
K252431 - Page 7 of 10
{7}
immunoglobulin fragments may produce antibodies (e.g. human anti-mouse antibodies, or HAMA) that can interfere with immunoassays. The Elecsys Calcitonin assay is affected by HAMA interference at high HAMA levels. Internal Study data show, for HAMA levels of 805 ng/mL, at calcitonin concentrations above 18 pg/mL, negative biases up to 20 % have been observed. Less than ±10 % bias was observed with HAMA levels of 81 ng/mL. In rare cases when samples contain high levels of HAMA, a negative bias may be observed. The interference is most critical in patients with distant metastasis where HAMA interference may impact clinical decision-making regarding additional patient management / treatment. In cases where interference is suspected, carefully evaluate the results and laboratories should follow their validated process for identifying HAMA interference.
## High Dose Hook Effect
High-dose hook effect of the Elecsys Calcitonin was assessed on the cobas e 411 analyzer. Three high concentration spiked serum samples were used to prepare a dilution series. The hook-samples were diluted with Diluent MultiAssay to create an 1:1 member sample panel with concentrations ranging from 0.1 pg/mL to >1,000,000 pg/mL. No hook effect was observed at concentrations up to 1,000,000 pg/mL (1 µg/mL).
## 4. Assay Reportable Range:
1-2,000 pg/mL
## 5. Traceability, Stability, Expected Values (Controls, Calibrators, or Methods):
Traceable to the WHO 2nd IRP 89/620 reference standard.
The sponsor has provided information to support the following claims: The reagent kit can be stored on-board the analyzer for up to 28 days. A new calibration of the kit kept on-board is recommended every 7 days. Information was also provided to support all claimed calibration recommendations.
## 6. Detection Limit:
The limit of blank (LoB), limit of detection (LoD), and limit of quantification (LoQ) were established following the recommendations in the CLSI EP17-A2 guideline.
### Limit of Blank (LoB)
The LoB study was performed on 1 blank sample measured in 10 replicates per run, 1 run per day, 6 days using 3 reagent lots and 1 cobas e 411 analyzer. The LoB was determined as the 95th percentile of the measurements of blank samples. The LoB for the Elecsys Calcitonin assay was estimated to be 0.3 pg/mL.
### Limit of Detection (LoD)
The LoD study was performed on 5 low-level native human serum samples measured in 2 replicates per run, 1 run per day, 6 days using 3 reagent lots and 1 cobas e 411 analyzer. The LoD = LoB + 1.653 x SDtotal. The LoD for the Elecsys Calcitonin assay was estimated to be 0.5 pg/mL.
K252431 - Page 8 of 10
{8}
Limit of Quantification (LoQ)
The LoQ study was performed on 10 low-level native human serum samples, each sample measured in 2 replicates, 1 run per day, 6 days of testing using 3 reagent lots. The LoQ is determined as the lowest concentration of analyte that can be reproducibly measured with a total error of ≤ 20%. The LoQ for the Elecsys Calcitonin assay was estimated to be 1.0 pg/mL.
7. Assay Cut-Off:
Not applicable
B Comparison Studies:
1. Method Comparison with Predicate Device:
A method comparison study of the candidate, Elecsys Calcitonin assay versus the predicate device, Elecsys Calcitonin (k132828), was performed. The study was conducted on one cobas e 411 analyzer according to CLSI Guideline EP09c, 3rd Edition. 120 serum samples were tested including native samples and native sample pools, and some samples (10%) spiked with recombinant hCT to cover the measuring interval. Calcitonin concentrations ranged from 1.07-1817 pg/mL. Passing-Bablok analysis was used to analyze the data.
Method Comparison Summary
Elecsys Calcitonin (candidate) vs Elecsys Calcitonin (predicate) in pg/mL:
| N | Concentration Range | Intercept (95% CI) | Slope (95% CI) | r |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 120 | 1.07-1817 | 0.318 (0.096, 0.655) | 0.983 (0.972, 1.013) | 0.996 |
2. Matrix Comparison:
The effect of anticoagulants on the measurement of calcitonin with the candidate device was assessed by comparing values obtained from serum, lithium heparin plasma, k2-EDTA plasma, K3-EDTA plasma, and tubes with separating gel for both serum (SST) and plasma (Li-PST). At least 40 sample pairs were tested in singleton with one reagent lot on one cobas e 411 analyzer. Passing/Bablok regression analysis was performed. Results are summarized below.
| Serum vs | n | Slope | Intercept | Range (pg/mL) | r |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Lithium Heparin | 45 | 1.027 | 0.12 | 1.18-1880 | 0.998 |
| Li-Heparin PST | 47 | 1.009 | 0.002 | 1.18-1897 | 0.999 |
| K2-EDTA | 47 | 0.957 | 0.019 | 1.18-1897 | 0.999 |
| K3-EDTA | 46 | 0.940 | 0.099 | 1.18-1897 | 0.999 |
| Serum SST | 49 | 0.980 | -0.035 | 1.18-1897 | 1.000 |
K252431 - Page 9 of 10
{9}
The data support the package insert claim that serum, Li-Heparin, K2-EDTA and K3-EDTA plasma and tubes with separating gel for both serum (SST) and plasma (Li-PST) are acceptable sample types for use with the Elecsys Calcitonin immunoassay.
## C Clinical Studies:
1. Clinical Sensitivity:
Not applicable
2. Clinical Specificity:
Not applicable
3. Other Clinical Supportive Data (When 1. and 2. Are Not Applicable):
Not applicable
## D Clinical Cut-Off:
Not applicable
## E Expected Values/Reference Range:
Previously established in K132828.
## VIII Proposed Labeling:
The labeling supports the finding of substantial equivalence for this device.
## IX Conclusion:
The submitted information in this premarket notification is complete and supports a substantial equivalence decision.
K252431 - Page 10 of 10
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.