The Nylon flexTAP is intended to reduce or alleviate nighttime snoring and mild to moderate obstructive sleep apnea, OSA for adults, 18 years of age and older.
Device Story
Custom-fit oral appliance; reduces/alleviates snoring and mild-to-moderate OSA. Comprised of upper tray, lower tray, and midline adjustment mechanism. Patient wears device in mouth during sleep; clinician or patient adjusts lower tray advancement via dial mechanism to titrate airway opening. Device functions by advancing lower jaw relative to upper jaw to maintain airway patency. Used in home and clinical settings. Benefits patient by reducing airway obstruction during sleep.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. Performance testing included functional durability after cleaning, flexural strength, force testing, and drop testing. Biocompatibility testing performed for mucosal membrane surface contact (>24 hours to <30 days).
Technological Characteristics
Custom-fit oral appliance; upper and lower trays made of digitally printed medical grade nylon. Midline advancement mechanism uses an adjustable screw/dial. Class II device; prescription only. Single patient, multi-use. Cleaned with water and toothbrush.
Indications for Use
Indicated for adults 18+ with nighttime snoring and mild to moderate obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Contraindicated for patients with loose teeth, loose dental work, dentures, or other oral conditions adversely affected by dental appliances; also contraindicated for patients with central sleep apnea, severe respiratory disorders, or those under 18 years of age.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
Intraoral devices for snoring and intraoral devices for snoring and obstructive sleep apnea are devices that are worn during sleep to reduce the incidence of snoring and to treat obstructive sleep apnea. The devices are designed to increase the patency of the airway and to decrease air turbulence and airway obstruction. The classification includes palatal lifting devices, tongue retaining devices, and mandibular repositioning devices.
Special Controls
*Classification.* Class II (special controls). The special control for these devices is the FDA guidance document entitled “Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Intraoral Devices for Snoring and/or Obstructive Sleep Apnea; Guidance for Industry and FDA.”
{0}
FDA U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION
September 11, 2025
Airway Technologies d/b/a Airway Management
% Paul Dryden
President
ProMedic, LLC
131 Bay Point Dr NE
Saint Petersburg, Florida 33704
Re: K252374
Trade/Device Name: Nylon flexTAP(R)
Regulation Number: 21 CFR 872.5570
Regulation Name: Intraoral Devices For Snoring And Intraoral Devices For Snoring And Obstructive Sleep Apnea
Regulatory Class: Class II
Product Code: LRK
Dated: July 30, 2025
Received: August 29, 2025
Dear Paul Dryden:
We have reviewed your section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database available at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
U.S. Food & Drug Administration
10903 New Hampshire Avenue
Silver Spring, MD 20993
www.fda.gov
{1}
K252374 - Paul Dryden
Page 2
Additional information about changes that may require a new premarket notification are provided in the FDA guidance documents entitled "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99812/download) and "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Software Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99785/download).
Your device is also subject to, among other requirements, the Quality System (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820), which includes, but is not limited to, 21 CFR 820.30, Design controls; 21 CFR 820.90, Nonconforming product; and 21 CFR 820.100, Corrective and preventive action. Please note that regardless of whether a change requires premarket review, the QS regulation requires device manufacturers to review and approve changes to device design and production (21 CFR 820.30 and 21 CFR 820.70) and document changes and approvals in the device master record (21 CFR 820.181).
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR Part 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reporting-combination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR Parts 1000-1050.
All medical devices, including Class I and unclassified devices and combination product device constituent parts are required to be in compliance with the final Unique Device Identification System rule ("UDI Rule"). The UDI Rule requires, among other things, that a device bear a unique device identifier (UDI) on its label and package (21 CFR 801.20(a)) unless an exception or alternative applies (21 CFR 801.20(b)) and that the dates on the device label be formatted in accordance with 21 CFR 801.18. The UDI Rule (21 CFR 830.300(a) and 830.320(b)) also requires that certain information be submitted to the Global Unique Device Identification Database (GUDID) (21 CFR Part 830 Subpart E). For additional information on these requirements, please see the UDI System webpage at https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance/unique-device-identification-system-udi-system.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reporting-mdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about medical devices and radiation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-
{2}
K252374 - Paul Dryden
Page 3
assistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
MICHAEL E. ADJODHA -S
Michael E. Adjodha, MChE, RAC, CQIA
Assistant Director
DHT1B: Division of Dental and ENT Devices
OHT1: Office of Ophthalmic, Anesthesia, Respiratory, ENT, and Dental Devices
Office of Product Evaluation and Quality
Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{3}
| Indications for Use | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Please type in the marketing application/submission number, if it is known. This textbox will be left blank for original applications/submissions. | K252374 | ? |
| Please provide the device trade name(s). | | ? |
| Nylon flexTAP(R) | | |
| Please provide your Indications for Use below. | | ? |
| The Nylon flexTAP is intended to reduce or alleviate nighttime snoring and mild to moderate obstructive sleep apnea, OSA for adults, 18 years of age and older. | | |
| Please select the types of uses (select one or both, as applicable). | ☑ Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) | ? |
| | ☐ Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C) | |
{4}
K252374
510(k) Summary
Date Prepared: 10-Sep-258-Sept-2025
Submitter: Airway Management
4300 Alpha Road #115
Farmers Branch, TX 75244
Tel - (469) 893-1340
Submitter Contact: Charles Collins, CEO
Submission Correspondent: Paul Dryden, ProMedic, LLC
Proprietary or Trade Name: Nylon flexTAP®
Common / Usual Name: Device, anti-snoring, Intraoral devices for snoring and intraoral devices for snoring and obstructive sleep apnea
Classification CFR: 21 CFR 872.5570
Product Code: LRK - Device, Anti-Snoring
Predicate Device: Airway Management – TAP T – K061732
Reference Device: Airway Management - TOA – K972061
Reference Device: Airway Management – myTAP 2 - K181482
Reference Device: Panthera Dental, Inc – The Panthera Anti-Snoring Device - K143244
Classification CFR: 21 CFR 872.5570
Product Code: LRK - Device, Anti-Snoring
## Device Description:
The Nylon flexTAP is a custom-fit oral device intended to reduce or alleviate nighttime snoring and mild to moderate obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). The Nylon flexTAP device consists of 3 components:
1. Upper Tray that fits on the upper teeth
2. Lower Tray that fits on the lower teeth.
3. An Adjustment Mechanism attached to the lower tray that fits into an Adjustment Post on the upper tray.
## Device Modifications:
Airway Management has previously submitted and received clearance for its custom-fit oral appliances. For this submission, we detail the design modifications outlined in this Special 510(k) premarket notification and how these modifications do not affect the intended use or the indications for use or alter the fundamental principle of operation for the device. The modifications made include changes to:
- Material Modification: The subject device includes digitally printed medical grade nylon material for the upper and lower tray.
- Titration Mechanism: The subject device utilizes an adjustment ‘dial’; whereas the predicate device utilized an adjustment ‘key’. The adjustment ‘dial’ mechanism is identical to the reference device.
The table below details the comparison between the subject device, predicate and reference devices.
Page 1 of 5
{5}
510(k) Summary
K252374
| Table 1 – Substantial Equivalence Table | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Attribute | Subject Device: Nylon flexTAP | Predicate Device: TAP-T (K061732) | Reference Device: TOA (K972061) | Discussion |
| Review Panel | Dental | Dental | Dental | Same |
| Device Classification | Class II | Class II | Class II | Same |
| Regulation | 21 CFR872.5570 - Intraoral devices for snoring and intraoral devices for snoring and obstructive sleep apnea | 21 CFR872.5570 - Intraoral devices for snoring and intraoral devices for snoring and obstructive sleep apnea | 21 CFR872.5570 - Intraoral devices for snoring and intraoral devices for snoring and obstructive sleep apnea | Same |
| Product Code: | LRK (Class 2) - Device, Anti-Snoring | LRK (Class 2) - Device, Anti-Snoring | LRK (Class 2) - Device, Anti-Snoring | Same as predicate |
| Indications for Use | The Nylon flexTAP is intended to reduce or alleviate nighttime snoring and mild to moderate obstructive sleep apnea, OSA. | The TAP T is intended to reduce or alleviate nighttime snoring and mild to moderate obstructive sleep apnea, OSA. | The TOA is intended to reduce or alleviate nighttime snoring and obstructive sleep apnea, OSA. | Identical to the predicate |
| Device Description | Nylon flexTAP is comprised of: • Upper tray • Lower tray • Mechanism to attach and advance lower tray relative to upper tray) | The TAP T is comprised of: • Lower tray • Upper tray • Impression material • Mechanism to attach and advance lower tray relative to upper tray | The TOA is comprised of: • Lower tray • Upper tray • Impression material • Mechanism to attach and advance lower tray relative to upper tray | Similar – The subject device utilizes an adjustment ‘dial’; whereas the predicate device utilized an adjustment ‘key’. The subject device adjustment ‘dial’ is identical to the reference device. All TAP appliances have a single point midline advancement. This means that the device only needs to be adjusted from one point, either using an |
| | | | | adjustment ‘key’ or using an additional ‘key’. |
{6}
K252374
510(k) Summary
| Table 1 – Substantial Equivalence Table | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Attribute | Subject Device: Nylon flexTAP | Predicate Device: TAP-T (K061732) | Reference Device: TOA (K972061) | Discussion |
| | | | | adjustment dial or a hex key. Both advancement mechanisms are identical and allow for easier titration with the appliance in the mouth. |
| Principle of Operation | Midline adjustment of the relative position of the trays by advancing the lower tray with adjustable screw. | Midline adjustment of the relative position of the trays by advancing the lower tray with adjustable screw. | Midline adjustment of the relative position of the trays by advancing the lower tray with adjustable screw. | Same |
| Environment of Use | Home and clinical settings | Home and clinical settings | Home and clinical settings | Same as predicate |
| Population | 18 years of age and older | Adults patients 18 years and older | Adults | Same as predicate |
| Contraindications | This device is contraindicated for patients with loose teeth, loose dental work, dentures, or other oral conditions which would be adversely affected by wearing dental appliances. In addition, the appliance is contraindicated for patients who have central sleep apnea, have severe respiratory disorders or are under 18 years of age. | This device is contraindicated for patients with loose teeth, loose dental work, dentures, or other oral conditions which would be adversely affected by wearing dental appliances. In addition, the appliance is contraindicated for patients who have central sleep apnea, have severe respiratory disorders or are under 18 years of age. | This device is contraindicated for patients with loose teeth, loose dental work, dentures, or other oral conditions which would be adversely affected by wearing dental appliances. In addition, the appliance is contraindicated for patients who have central sleep apnea, have severe respiratory disorders or are under 18 years of age. | Same as predicate |
| Duration of Use | Single patient, multi-use. | Single patient, multi-use. | Single patient, multi-use | Same as predicate |
| Method of cleaning | Water, toothbrush | Water, mild soap, toothbrush | Water, mild soap, toothbrush | Similar |
| Rx | Prescription only | Prescription only | Prescription only | Same as the predicate |
| Non-clinical performance testing | • Functional testing for durability after multiple cleanings
• Flexural strength | • Functional testing for durability after multiple cleanings
• Flexural strength | • Functional testing for durability after multiple cleanings | Non-clinical testing is identical to the predicate device. |
Page 3 of 5
{7}
K252374
510(k) Summary
| Table 1 – Substantial Equivalence Table | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Attribute | Subject Device: Nylon flexTAP | Predicate Device: TAP-T (K061732) | Reference Device: TOA (K972061) | Discussion |
| | • Force testing
• Drop test | • Force testing
• Drop test | • Flexural strength
• Force testing
• Drop test | |
| Biocompatibility of Materials | • Surface Contacting
• Mucosal membrane,
• With duration of use prolonged > 24 hours < 30 days | • Surface Contacting
• Mucosal membrane,
• With duration of use prolonged > 24 hours < 30 days | • Surface Contacting
• Mucosal membrane,
• With duration of use prolonged > 24 hours < 30 days | Biocompatibility
Testing requirements are identical to the predicate.
Materials are identical to the reference devices (K181482 and K143244) |
Page 4 of 5
{8}
K252374
510(k) Summary
## Discussion of Substantial Equivalence to Predicate Device
There are no differences between the subject device, predicate device and reference device except for:
1. Material Change: We have submitted a Material Certification to support biocompatibility for the materials for the subject device with the use of reference devices.
2. Titration Mechanism: The subject device utilizes an adjustment ‘dial’; whereas the predicate device utilized an adjustment ‘key’. The subject device’s adjustment ‘dial’ is identical to the reference device’s titration dial adjustment mechanism. All TAP appliances have a single point midline advancement. This means that the device only needs to be adjusted from one point, either using an adjustment dial or a hex key. Both advancement mechanisms are identical and allow for easier titration with the appliance in the mouth.
These differences do not raise any new questions of safety or efficacy as compared to the predicate.
## Substantial Equivalence Conclusion
The subject device is substantial equivalent to the predicate device. The Nylon flexTAP does not raise any new questions of safety or efficacy as compared to the predicate.
Page 5 of 5
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.