The cobas® pulse blood glucose monitoring system consists of the cobas® pulse instrument and the cobas® GLU test strips. This system is intended for in vitro diagnostic, point of care, multiple-patient use within professional healthcare settings, including patients receiving intensive medical intervention/therapy. The cobas® GLU test strips provide an in vitro diagnostic test that quantitatively measures glucose in venous whole blood, arterial whole blood, neonate arterial whole blood, or neonate heel stick whole blood samples, on the cobas® pulse system. For neonate heel stick, the system should only be used with single-use, auto-disabling lancing devices. This system is not intended for use with capillary fingerstick, neonate cord blood specimens or neonate venous specimens. This system is not intended for screening or diagnosis of diabetes, but is indicated for use in determining dysglycemia.
Device Story
Hand-held, battery-powered glucose monitoring system; uses FAD-dependent glucose dehydrogenase (FAD-GDH) test strips. Input: fresh venous, arterial, or neonate heel stick whole blood. Operation: blood applied to strip; chemical reaction generates current proportional to glucose concentration; meter calculates and displays plasma-equivalent glucose. Used in professional healthcare settings (ICU, ER, wards) by trained operators. Includes barcode scanner for patient ID. Output: quantitative glucose concentration. Benefits: rapid point-of-care dysglycemia assessment. System requires lithium heparin anticoagulant; prohibits capillary fingerstick use due to observed bias.
Clinical Evidence
Clinical study in professional healthcare settings (7 sites, 28 operators) using 643 venous whole blood samples from 643 subjects (ages 1 to >81). Comparator: plasma-based hexokinase (HK) method on cobas 6000. Results: 100% of samples within ±15 mg/dL (for <75 mg/dL) and ±20% (for ≥75 mg/dL) of reference. Study included critically ill and non-critically ill patients with diverse conditions and medications.
Technological Characteristics
Hand-held, battery-powered instrument. Amperometric assay using FAD-dependent glucose dehydrogenase. Measures current proportional to glucose concentration. Reports plasma-equivalent values. Connectivity includes barcode scanner for patient/lot identification. No user calibration required; lot-specific calibration data read from test strips. Lithium heparin required for collection. No changes to materials or physical design from K220272.
Indications for Use
Indicated for professional healthcare use in patients (including neonates) requiring glucose monitoring in venous, arterial, or neonate heel stick whole blood. Contraindicated for capillary fingerstick, neonate cord blood, or neonate venous specimens.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A glucose test system is a device intended to measure glucose quantitatively in blood and other body fluids. Glucose measurements are used in the diagnosis and treatment of carbohydrate metabolism disorders including diabetes mellitus, neonatal hypoglycemia, and idiopathic hypoglycemia, and of pancreatic islet cell carcinoma.
Special Controls
*Classification.* Class II (special controls). The device, when it is solely intended for use as a drink to test glucose tolerance, is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 862.9.
{0}
**FDA** U.S. FOOD & DRUG
ADMINISTRATION
# **510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION
DECISION SUMMARY
ASSAY AND INSTRUMENT**
# **I Background Information:**
# **A 510(k) Number**
K252323
# **B Applicant**
Roche Diagnostics
# **C Proprietary and Established Names**
cobas® pulse blood glucose monitoring system
# **D Regulatory Information**
| Product Code(s) | Classification | Regulation Section | Panel |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| PZI | Class II | 21 CFR 862.1345 - Glucose Test System | CH - Clinical Chemistry |
# **II Submission/Device Overview:**
# **A Purpose for Submission:**
This submission is a Dual 510(k) and CLIA Waiver by Application (Dual Submission) for a modified device, tracked as K252323 and CW250013, to add venous whole blood as a new sample type to the device previously cleared in K220272 and granted CLIA Waiver by application in CW220002.
# **B Measurand:**
Glucose
# **C Type of Test:**
Quantitative amperometric assay for blood glucose (FAD-dependent glucose dehydrogenase)
Food and Drug Administration
10903 New Hampshire Avenue
Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
www.fda.gov
{1}
### III Intended Use/Indications for Use:
#### A Intended Use(s):
See Indications for Use below.
#### B Indication(s) for Use:
The cobas® pulse blood glucose monitoring system consists of the cobas® pulse instrument and the cobas® GLU test strips.
This system is intended for in vitro diagnostic, point of care, multiple-patient use within professional healthcare settings, including patients receiving intensive medical intervention/therapy.
The cobas® GLU test strips provide an in vitro diagnostic test that quantitatively measures glucose in venous whole blood, arterial whole blood, neonate arterial whole blood, or neonate heel stick whole blood samples, on the cobas® pulse system.
For neonate heel stick, the system should only be used with single-use, auto-disabling lancing devices.
This system is not intended for use with capillary fingerstick, neonate cord blood specimens or neonate venous specimens.
This system is not intended for screening or diagnosis of diabetes, but is indicated for use in determining dysglycemia.
#### C Special Conditions for Use Statement(s):
Rx - For Prescription Use Only
- For in vitro diagnostic use only
- This system is not intended for use with capillary finger stick or neonate cord blood specimens.
*See section VII.C.3 for additional information on sample limitations.
- Not for alternative site testing (AST)
- This system is not intended for screening or diagnosis of diabetes.
- Only use fresh whole blood for neonate heel stick or whole blood collected in lithium heparin collection devices for venous, arterial, neonate arterial, or neonate heel stick whole blood.
- Use only an auto-disabling single-use lancing devices for heel stick samples.
- Take caution to clear venous and arterial lines before the blood sample is obtained and applied to the test strip.
- Use only lithium heparin anticoagulant for blood collection.
- Altitudes above 14,107 feet (4300 meters) above sea level have not been evaluated.
#### D Special Instrument Requirements:
cobas® pulse instrument
K252323 - Page 2 of 11
{2}
# IV Device/System Characteristics:
# A Device Description:
The cobas® pulse blood glucose monitoring system consists of a hand-held, battery powered cobas® pulse instrument, single use cobas® GLU test strips, instrument charging station, quick reference guide and user guide for CLIA waived users as well as cobas® GLU test strip insert and user assistance guide for non-CLIA waived users. The cobas® GLU Linearity Kit and GLU QC kit are sold separately.
# B Principle of Operation:
The detection chemistry used by the cobas® pulse blood glucose monitoring system for the blood glucose result is FAD-dependent glucose dehydrogenase (FAD-GDH). When the blood is applied to the test strip, the blood induces a chemical reaction which produces a current that is transmitted through the electrodes to the instrument. The magnitude of the resultant current is proportional to the glucose concentration in the sample. The detected current signal is then calculated by the meter and the glucose concentration is then displayed on the meter. The meter reports plasma equivalent glucose concentrations.
# C Instrument Description Information:
1. Instrument Name:
cobas® pulse instrument
2. Specimen Identification:
Fresh whole blood from neonate heel stick or whole blood collected in lithium heparin collection devices for venous, arterial, neonate arterial, or neonate heel stick whole blood can be used with this test system. The meter contains a laser barcode scanner that allows for scanning patient identification information that may also be entered manually. The meter prompts the user to choose from a dropdown menu of sample types prior to testing.
3. Specimen Sampling and Handling:
All samples must be tested immediately upon collection.
4. Calibration:
The System does not require calibration by the end-user. Each lot contains calibration information that is uploaded into the instrument. When the test strip is inserted into the instrument, the instrument reads the test strip lot information from the strip that includes the calibration and expiration information for that test strip lot.
K252323 - Page 3 of 11
{3}
# 5. Quality Control:
The cobas® GLU QC kit control solutions are aqueous solutions available at two different glucose levels (Level 1 and Level 2). Instructions on when to perform quality control testing using both levels are included in the labeling. It is recommended to run both levels of quality controls at least once every 24 hours of patient testing and when one of the following occurs:
- the first time before using the instrument for patient testing,
- the first time the instrument is used by the operator,
- at shorter QC intervals if established by the workplace,
- when a new test strip container is opened,
- if there is a doubt about patient's glucose result,
- to test correct performance of the system,
- if the instrument was dropped,
- when other problems are suspected or identified (e.g., instrument outside of environmental conditions)
If the quality control testing using both QC levels is not performed when required as described in the labeling, the user is cautioned that a QC lockout is implemented, and blood glucose cannot be tested until the QC tests are run successfully. The meter displays a pass or fail result once both QC tests are performed. The acceptable ranges are communicated to the meter by the user scanning the barcode on the QC bottle. The user is cautioned not to use the meter and to contact the system administrator if the quality control test fails after repeating the QC test.
# V Substantial Equivalence Information:
# A Predicate Device Name(s):
StatStrip Glucose Hospital Meter System
# B Predicate 510(k) Number(s):
K181043
# C Comparison with Predicate(s):
| Device & Predicate Device(s): | K252323 | K181043 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Device Trade Name | cobas® pulse blood glucose monitoring system | StatStrip Glucose Hospital Meter System |
| **General Device Characteristic Similarities** | | |
| Intended Use/Indications For Use | Quantitative determination of glucose for use in determining dysglycemia in professional healthcare | Same |
K252323 - Page 4 of 11
{4}
| | settings. | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Measuring Range | 10 to 600 mg/dL | Same |
| **General Device Characteristic Differences** | | |
| Enzyme | FAD-dependent glucose dehydrogenase | Glucose oxidase |
| Sample Types | Venous whole blood, arterial whole blood, neonate arterial whole blood, and neonate heel stick whole blood | Capillary finger stick, venous whole blood, arterial whole blood, neonate arterial whole blood and neonate heel stick specimens |
### VI Standards/Guidance Documents Referenced:
CLSI EP09c 3rd edition. Measurement Procedure Comparison and Bias Estimation Using Patient Samples.
FDA Guidance “Blood Glucose Monitoring Test Systems for Prescription Point-of-Care Use” - September 29, 2020
### VII Performance Characteristics (if/when applicable):
The sponsor has made no technological, material, performance, or physical design changes from the device cleared in K220272. Therefore, the sponsor is leveraging analytical performance studies and flex studies from K220272 to support the function of the candidate device.
### A Analytical Performance:
1. Precision/Reproducibility:
Previously established in K220272.
2. Linearity:
Previously established in K220272.
3. Analytical Specificity/Interference:
Previously established in K220272.
4. Assay Reportable Range:
The reportable range is 10 to 600 mg/dL.
K252323 - Page 5 of 11
{5}
# 5. Traceability, Stability, Expected Values (Controls, Calibrators, or Methods):
# *Traceability*
Each measurement result is traceable to the NIST SRM 917 glucose reference material. A method comparison was performed using the candidate device and the Roche Glucose HK Gen.3 assay on the cobas® 6000 system as the comparator method (see section VII.C.3 below).
# *Test Strip Stability*
Previously established in K220272. The labeling claims a 24-month closed vial shelf life and open vial use life when stored at 4 to 30°C (39 to 86°F) and relative humidity of 10 to 90%. The labeling instructs the users not to freeze the test strips.
# 6. Detection Limit:
Not applicable.
# 7. Assay Cut-Off:
Not applicable.
# 8. Accuracy (Instrument):
See Section C.3. Other Clinical Supportive Data.
# 9. Carry-Over:
Not applicable.
# **B Comparison Studies:**
# 1. Method Comparison with Predicate Device:
See Section VII.C.3. Other Clinical Supportive Data.
# 2. Matrix Comparison:
Not applicable.
# **C Clinical Studies:**
# 1. Clinical Sensitivity:
Not applicable.
# 2. Clinical Specificity:
Not applicable.
K252323 - Page 6 of 11
{6}
### 3. Other Clinical Supportive Data (When 1. and 2. Are Not Applicable):
The performance of the cobas® pulse glucose monitoring system was assessed in professional healthcare settings using lithium heparin venous samples from 643 patients (571 adult and 72 pediatric). The study was conducted at 7 clinical sites and included patients from the general ward, operating rooms, emergency rooms, medical intensive care units, surgical intensive care units, pediatric intensive care units, urgent care clinics, and outpatient clinics. Results from the cobas® pulse glucose monitoring system were obtained by a total of 28 untrained operators.
Venous samples from patients (1 to over 81 years of age) were analyzed using a total of 3 different test strip lots. The glucose levels of the patient samples (according to the comparator) ranged from 26.1 to 482.6 mg/dL for all venous samples (156 samples <80 mg/dL and 14 samples >300 mg/dL). In addition to glucose levels, patient conditions, medication information, pO2, sodium, and hematocrit levels were collected during the study. The study included 665 unique patient conditions receiving a total of 616 medications representing 73 parent drug classes (see patient conditions and medication tables below).
The results of the cobas® pulse glucose monitoring system were compared with those obtained on the comparator and are as follows:
#### Venous Whole Blood
Glucose concentrations < 75 mg/dL
| Within ± 5 mg/dL | Within ± 10 mg/dL | Within ± 12 mg/dL | Within ± 15 mg/dL | Exceeds ± 15 mg/dL |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 93/110 (84.5%) | 109/110 (99.1%) | 110/110 (100.0%) | 110/110 (100.0%) | 0/110 (0.0%) |
Glucose concentrations ≥ 75 mg/dL
| Within ± 5 % | Within ± 10 % | Within ± 12 % | Within ± 15 % | Within ± 20 % | Exceeds ± 20 % |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 444/533 (83.3%) | 524/533 (98.3%) | 529/533 (99.2%) | 533/533 (100.0%) | 533/533 (100.0%) | 0/533 (0.0%) |
| Regression Analysis | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Slope | y-intercept | R^{2}-value |
| 1.008 | -1.60 | 0.994 |
#### Usability Assessment/Operator Questionnaire
Upon completion of the clinical studies, operators completed a questionnaire to evaluate the ease of understanding of the test procedure. The participants found the cobas® pulse glucose monitoring system easy to use and the instructions in the user manual and quick reference guide are clear and easy to follow.
K252323 - Page 7 of 11
{7}
A readability assessment demonstrated that the quick reference guide and the instructions for the CLIA waived user in the user manual were written at a 7th grade reading level.
#### Patient Conditions and Medication
For all venous patients combined, there were a total of 665 unique patient conditions observed among the study subjects and 616 different medications administered to study subjects within 24 hours of blood draw. A summary of the medications and diagnosis for each sample type is shown below:
| Sample Type | Number of Patients | Different Medications | Medication Classes | Different Diagnoses | System Organ Classes |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Venous | 643 | 616 | 73 | 665 | 26 |
The number of patients in the study by condition (organ classes) and medication classes are detailed below:
#### Patient Conditions
| System Organ Class | Number of Patients |
| --- | --- |
| Blood and lymphatic system disorders | 44 |
| Cardiac disorders | 128 |
| Congenital, familial and genetic disorders | 28 |
| Ear and labyrinth disorders | 15 |
| Endocrine disorders | 48 |
| Eye disorders | 19 |
| Gastrointestinal disorders | 135 |
| General disorders and administration site conditions | 38 |
| Hepatobiliary disorders | 13 |
| Immune system disorders | 29 |
| Infections and infestations | 107 |
| Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | 112 |
| Investigations (laboratory testing and diagnostic procedures) | 77 |
| Metabolism and nutrition disorders | 245 |
| Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | 106 |
| Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | 52 |
| Nervous system disorders | 153 |
| Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions | 9 |
| Psychiatric disorders | 179 |
| Renal and urinary disorders | 51 |
| Reproductive system and breast disorders | 25 |
| Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | 119 |
| Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | 29 |
| Social circumstances | 11 |
| Surgical and medical procedures | 50 |
K252323 - Page 8 of 11
{8}
| System Organ Class | Number of Patients |
| --- | --- |
| Vascular disorders | 193 |
### Medications
| Medication Class | Number of Patients |
| --- | --- |
| Agents acting on the renin-angiotensin system | 66 |
| All other non-therapeutic products | 2 |
| All other therapeutic products | 12 |
| Analgesics | 355 |
| Anesthetics | 94 |
| Anthelmintics | 1 |
| Anti-acne preparations | 1 |
| Anti-parkinson drugs | 9 |
| Antianemic preparations | 39 |
| Antibacterials for systemic use | 152 |
| Antibiotics and chemotherapeutics dermatological use | 15 |
| Antidiarrheals, intestinal antiinflammatory/ antiinfective | 5 |
| Antiemetics and antinauseants | 64 |
| Antiepileptics | 30 |
| Antifungals for dermatological use | 2 |
| Antigout preparations | 6 |
| Antihemorrhagics | 7 |
| Antihistamines for systemic use | 46 |
| Antihypertensives | 27 |
| Antiinflammatory and antirheumatic products | 56 |
| Antimycotics for systemic use | 17 |
| Antineoplastic agents | 2 |
| Antipruritics, incl. Antihistamines, anesthetics, etc. | 30 |
| Antiseptics and disinfectants | 4 |
| Antithrombotic agents | 206 |
| Antivirals for systemic use | 6 |
| Beta blocking agents | 73 |
| Bile and liver therapy | 3 |
| Blood substitutes and perfusion solutions | 266 |
| Calcium channel blockers | 25 |
| Cardiac therapy | 78 |
| Contrast media | 37 |
| Corticosteroids for systemic use | 25 |
| Corticosteroids, dermatological preparations | 3 |
| Cough and cold preparations | 9 |
| Digestives, incl. Enzymes | 1 |
| Diuretics | 64 |
| Drugs for acid related disorders | 147 |
| Drugs for constipation | 166 |
| Drugs for functional gastrointestinal disorders | 8 |
| Drugs for obstructive airway diseases | 83 |
| Drugs in treatment of bone diseases | 2 |
K252323 - Page 9 of 11
{9}
| Medication Class | Number of Patients |
| --- | --- |
| Drugs used in diabetes | 196 |
| Emollients and protectives | 9 |
| Endocrine therapy | 1 |
| General nutrients | 10 |
| Immunosuppressants | 10 |
| Lipid modifying agents | 117 |
| Mineral supplements | 83 |
| Muscle relaxants | 104 |
| Nasal preparations | 14 |
| Ophthalmological and otological preparations | 1 |
| Ophthalmologicals | 16 |
| Other alimentary tract and metabolism products | 14 |
| Other dermatological preparations | 1 |
| Other hematological agents | 1 |
| Other nervous system drugs | 19 |
| Otologicals | 1 |
| Pancreatic hormones | 4 |
| Pituitary and hypothalamic hormones and analogues | 7 |
| Psychoanaleptics | 94 |
| Psycholeptics | 125 |
| Sex hormones and modulators of the genital system | 13 |
| Stomatological preparations | 17 |
| Throat preparations | 2 |
| Thyroid therapy | 45 |
| Topical products for joint and muscular pain | 2 |
| Urologicals | 30 |
| Vaccines | 11 |
| Vitamins | 120 |
Accuracy at extreme glucose concentrations
Previously established in K220272.
Capillary Fingerstick Whole Blood Limitations
The sponsor includes limitations against the use of the cobas® pulse glucose monitoring system with capillary fingerstick whole blood. The labeling states the following limitations:
- This system is not intended for use with capillary finger stick whole blood, neonate cord blood specimens or neonate venous specimens.
- In comparing capillary whole blood glucose measurements using the cobas® pulse to venous plasma measurements using the comparator method, a large percentage of samples had significant bias to the comparator method.
These limitations were put in place due to risks posed by the performance of cobas® pulse glucose monitoring system with capillary fingerstick samples. The results of this device were compared with those obtained on the comparator method and are as follows:
K252323 - Page 10 of 11
{10}
For capillary fingerstick samples, 54.5% (12/22) of samples with glucose concentrations <75 mg/dL were within ±12 mg/dL and 45.5% (10/22) exceeded a difference of ±15 mg/dL relative to the comparator method result. Additionally, for capillary fingerstick samples with glucose concentrations ≥75 mg/dL, 82.2% (562/684) of the samples were within ±12 mg/dL and 7.0% (48/684) exceeded a difference of ±20% relative to the comparator method results.
**D Clinical Cut-Off:**
Not applicable.
**E Expected Values/Reference Range:**
The sponsor includes the following in the labeling:
The normal fasting serum and plasma glucose levels for an adult without diabetes is between 74-100 mg/dL.¹,² The normal glucose level for an adult without diabetes two hours post-meal is less than 140 mg/dL.²
References:
1. Tietz (2018) Textbook of Clinical Chemistry and Molecular Diagnostics, 6th edition, ISBN:978-0-323-35921-4.
2. ElSayed NA, Aleppo G, Aroda VR, et al., American Diabetes Association. 2. Classification and diagnosis of diabetes: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2023. Diabetes Care 2023;46 (Suppl. 1):S19–S40.
**F Other Supportive Instrument Performance Characteristics Data:**
Previously established in K220272.
**VIII Proposed Labeling:**
The labeling supports the finding of substantial equivalence for this device.
**IX Conclusion:**
The submitted information in this premarket notification is complete and supports a substantial equivalence decision.
K252323 - Page 11 of 11
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.