K252208 · Ford Medtech, LLC · HIB · Mar 6, 2026 · Obstetrics/Gynecology
Device Facts
Record ID
K252208
Device Name
JFord Speculum Sleeve™
Applicant
Ford Medtech, LLC
Product Code
HIB · Obstetrics/Gynecology
Decision Date
Mar 6, 2026
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 884.4530
Device Class
Class 2
Indications for Use
The JFord Speculum Sleeve™ is a single use, inflatable vaginal wall retraction sleeve intended for use with a vaginal speculum to dilate the vagina and expose the interior of the vagina and exterior of the cervix during pelvic examinations and other gynecological procedures.
Device Story
JFord Speculum Sleeve is a single-use, non-sterile, inflatable sleeve for use with medium or large vaginal specula; device features a bottom blade pocket, top sleeve, and bilateral expandable pouches. Clinician inserts sleeve over speculum blades; pouches are inflated with up to 30 mL of potable water or saline via a standard Luer lock syringe. Inflation laterally displaces redundant vaginal walls to improve visualization of the cervix during pelvic exams. Device is intended for use in clinical settings by healthcare providers. Output is improved anatomical exposure; aids clinician in performing examinations when vaginal wall redundancy is present. Benefits include enhanced visualization and ease of procedure.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. Studies included biocompatibility (ISO 10993-5, -10, -23), visualization efficacy (simulated use with 30mm target), device cycling (5 cycles), pouch burst/pressure testing (max 60mmHg), pull force/elongation, and chemical compatibility. Summative usability testing confirmed safe use by intended users without serious use errors.
Technological Characteristics
Materials: Clear polyurethane. Design: Flexible sleeve with bilateral expandable pouches, bottom blade pocket, and flexible inflation tubing. Energy: Manual (30mL Luer lock syringe for fluid inflation). Dimensions: Compatible with medium/large specula. Sterilization: Non-sterile. Connectivity: None.
Indications for Use
Indicated for patients undergoing pelvic examinations or gynecological procedures requiring vaginal dilation and exposure of the vaginal interior and cervix.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
An obstetric-gynecologic specialized manual instrument is one of a group of devices used during obstetric-gynecologic procedures to perform manipulative diagnostic and surgical functions (e.g., dilating, grasping, measuring, and scraping), where structural integrity is the chief criterion of device performance. This type of device consists of the following:(1) An amniotome is an instrument used to rupture the fetal membranes. (2) A circumcision clamp is an instrument used to compress the foreskin of the penis during circumcision of a male infant. (3) An umbilical clamp is an instrument used to compress the umbilical cord. (4) A uterine curette is an instrument used to scrape and remove material from the uterus. (5) A fixed-size cervical dilator is any of a series of bougies of various sizes used to dilate the cervical os by stretching the cervix. (6) A uterine elevator is an instrument inserted into the uterus used to lift and manipulate the uterus. (7) A gynecological surgical forceps is an instrument with two blades and handles used to pull, grasp, or compress during gynecological examination. (8) A cervical cone knife is a cutting instrument used to excise and remove tissue from the cervix. (9) A gynecological cerclage needle is a looplike instrument used to suture the cervix. (10) A hook-type contraceptive intrauterine device (IUD) remover is an instrument used to remove an IUD from the uterus. (11) A gynecological fibroid screw is an instrument used to hold onto a fibroid. (12) A uterine sound is an instrument used to determine the depth of the uterus by inserting it into the uterine cavity. (13) A cytological cervical spatula is a blunt instrument used to scrape and remove cytological material from the surface of the cervix or vagina. (14) A gynecological biopsy forceps is an instrument with two blades and handles used for gynecological biopsy procedures. (15) A uterine tenaculum is a hooklike instrument used to seize and hold the cervix or fundus. (16) An internal pelvimeter is an instrument used within the vagina to measure the diameter and capacity of the pelvis. (17) A nonmetal vaginal speculum is a nonmetal instrument used to expose the interior of the vagina. (18) A fiberoptic nonmetal vaginal speculum is a nonmetal instrument, with fiberoptic light, used to expose and illuminate the interior of the vagina.
Special Controls
*Classification.* (1) Class II (special controls). The device, when it is an umbilical clamp with or without a cutter, a uterine tenaculum which is sterile and does not use suction and is intended for single use, a nonmetal vaginal speculum, or a fiberoptic nonmetal vaginal speculum, is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 884.9.(2) Class I for the amniotome, uterine curette, cervical dilator (fixed-size bougies), cerclage needle, IUD remover, uterine sound, and gynecological biopsy forceps. The devices subject to this paragraph (b)(2) are exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter, subject to the limitations in § 884.9.
{0}
FDA U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION
March 6, 2026
Ford Medtech, LLC
% Michele Jans
Principal, Regulatory Consultant
The Jans Group, LLC
4417 New Hope Springs Drive
Hillsborough, North Carolina 27278
Re: K252208
Trade/Device Name: JFord Speculum Sleeve™
Regulation Number: 21 CFR 884.4530
Regulation Name: Obstetric-Gynecologic Specialized Manual Instrument
Regulatory Class: II
Product Code: HIB
Received: January 28, 2026
Dear Michele Jans:
We have reviewed your section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database available at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Additional information about changes that may require a new premarket notification are provided in the FDA guidance documents entitled "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99812/download) and "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Software Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99785/download).
U.S. Food & Drug Administration
10903 New Hampshire Avenue
Silver Spring, MD 20993
www.fda.gov
{1}
K252208 - Michele Jans
Page 2
Your device is also subject to, among other requirements, the Quality Management System Regulation (QMSR) (21 CFR Part 820), which includes, but is not limited to, ISO 13485 clause 7.3 (Design controls), ISO 13484 clause 8.3 (Nonconforming product), and ISO 13485 clause 8.5 (Corrective and preventative action). Please note that regardless of whether a change requires premarket review, the QMSR requires device manufacturers to review and approve changes to device design and production (ISO 13485 clause 7.3 and 21 CFR 820.70) and document changes and approvals in the device master record (21 CFR 820.181).
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR Part 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reporting-combination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the Quality Management System Regulation (QMSR) (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR Parts 1000-1050.
All medical devices, including Class I and unclassified devices and combination product device constituent parts are required to be in compliance with the final Unique Device Identification System rule ("UDI Rule"). The UDI Rule requires, among other things, that a device bear a unique device identifier (UDI) on its label and package (21 CFR 801.20(a)) unless an exception or alternative applies (21 CFR 801.20(b)) and that the dates on the device label be formatted in accordance with 21 CFR 801.18. The UDI Rule (21 CFR 830.300(a) and 830.320(b)) also requires that certain information be submitted to the Global Unique Device Identification Database (GUDID) (21 CFR Part 830 Subpart E). For additional information on these requirements, please see the UDI System webpage at https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance/unique-device-identification-system-udi-system.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reporting-mdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about medical devices and radiation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See
{2}
K252208 - Michele Jans
Page 3
the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
JASON ROBERTS -S
Jason R. Roberts, Ph.D.
Assistant Director
DHT3B: Division of Reproductive, Gynecology, and Urology Devices
OHT3: Office of Gastrorenal, ObGyn, General Hospital, and Urology Devices
Office of Product Evaluation and Quality
Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{3}
FORM FDA 3881 (8/23)
Page 1 of 1
PSC Publishing Services (301) 443-6740
EF
| DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Food and Drug Administration Indications for Use | Form Approved: OMB No. 0910-0120 Expiration Date: 07/31/2026 See PRA Statement below. |
| --- | --- |
| 510(k) Number (if known) K252208 | |
| Device Name JFord Speculum Sleeve™ | |
| Indications for Use (Describe) The JFord Speculum Sleeve™ is a single use, inflatable vaginal wall retraction sleeve intended for use with a vaginal speculum to dilate the vagina and expose the interior of the vagina and exterior of the cervix during pelvic examinations and other gynecological procedures. | |
| Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable) ☑ Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) ☐ Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C) | |
| CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED. | |
| This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.* | |
| The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to: Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov | |
| "An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number." | |
{4}
K252208
Page 1 of 4
510(k) Summary
1. Submitter
Sponsor Name: Ford Medtech, LLC
Address: 251 Post Avenue, 2nd Floor
Westbury, NY 11590
Phone: (516) 203-4316
Contact Person: Jacqueline Ford, MD
Date Prepared: March 5, 2026
2. Device
Name of Device: JFord Speculum Sleeve™
Common or Usual Name: Vaginal Speculum
Classification Name: Speculum, Vaginal, Nonmetal (884.4530)
Regulatory Class: 2
Product Code: HIB
3. Predicate Device
Predicate Device: ClearSpec® Single Use Vaginal Speculum (K130046)
The predicate has not been subject to a design-related recall.
4. Device Description
The JFord Speculum Sleeve™ is a single use, non-sterile, inflatable vaginal wall retraction sleeve designed for use with single use or reusable vaginal specula (medium or large sizes). The speculum sleeve, while used with a vaginal speculum, provides lateral displacement of vaginal tissue during routine female pelvic examinations or other gynecological procedures. The speculum sleeve is intended to assist the clinician in examination when challenged by redundant vaginal walls.
The speculum sleeve has a bottom blade pocket and top sleeve for the speculum blades and bilateral expandable pouches. Using the supplied 30 mL syringe, the expandable pouches are filled as needed with potable water or saline during use to laterally displace redundant vaginal walls to enable optimal visualization.
{5}
K252208
Page 2 of 4
5. Indications for Use
The JFord Speculum Sleeve™ is a single use, inflatable vaginal wall retraction sleeve intended for use with a vaginal speculum to dilate the vagina and expose the interior of the vagina and exterior of the cervix during pelvic examinations and other gynecological procedures.
6. Comparison of Technological Characteristics with the Predicate Device
A chart comparing the subject device to the predicate device is provided below.
Table 1. Comparison Chart – Subject and Predicate Devices
| Characteristic | Subject Device | Predicate Device (K130046) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Device Name | JFord Speculum Sleeve™ | ClearSpec® Single-Use Vaginal Speculum (Impact Innovations LLC) |
| Classification / Product Code | 884.4530 / HIB | 884.4530 / HIB |
| Indications for Use | For use with a vaginal speculum to dilate the vagina and expose the interior of the vagina and exterior of the cervix during pelvic examinations and other gynecological procedures. | To dilate the vagina and expose the interior of the vagina and exterior of the cervix during pelvic examinations and other gynecological procedures. |
| Prescription Use | Yes | Yes |
| Usage | Single use | Single use |
| Sterility | Non-sterile | Non-sterile |
| Materials | Patient-contacting
• Clear polyurethane (sleeve and tubing) | Patient-contacting
• Clear polyurethane (sheath)
• Polystyrene (speculum) |
| Design characteristics | • Disposable, flexible sleeve with bottom blade pocket for use with a vaginal speculum to retract vaginal sidewalls
• Bilateral expandable pouches are designed to be filled with up to a maximum of 30 mL of potable water or saline to mechanically retract vaginal sidewalls
• Flexible tubing is used to inflate both expandable pouches during use | • Disposable vaginal speculum that employs a built-in flexible sheath designed to retract vaginal sidewalls |
2
{6}
K252208
Page 3 of 4
| Characteristic | Subject Device | Predicate Device (K130046) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | • A standard 30mL Luer lock syringe is used to inflate the bilateral expandable pouches with fluid | |
| Speculum Sizes | Fits commonly used medium and large-sized vaginal specula | Available in small to large sizes |
## 7. Performance Data
The following non-clinical performance data were provided in support of the substantial equivalence determination.
### Biocompatibility
The biological evaluation for the JFord Speculum Sleeve™ was conducted in accordance with the FDA guidance “Use of International Standard ISO 10993-1, “Biological evaluation of medical device – Part 1: Evaluation and testing within a risk management process,” September 8, 2023. The speculum sleeve comes in contact with vaginal mucosa for a duration of less than 24 hours, thus, the following tests were performed:
- Cytotoxicity – ISO 10993-5:2099
- Sensitization – ISO 10993-10:2021
- Vaginal Irritation – ISO 10993-23:2021
Testing results demonstrated that the device is biocompatible. The device is not cytotoxic, is not a sensitizer, and is not a vaginal irritant.
### Visualization Study
This study demonstrated that the visualization area of the cervix using the speculum sleeve is equal to or greater than the visualization area of the cervix using the speculum alone under simulated use conditions. Testing was performed at minimum and maximum vaginal diameters and at minimum and maximum vaginal pressures. A visualization target that represented a 30mm cervix was used during testing. Observations also determined that the sleeve’s expandable pouches deflated sufficiently to allow removal with the sleeve intact.
### Device Cycling
This study demonstrated that the speculum sleeve can withstand five simulated use cycles during setup and use in a single procedure without failures.
### Pouch Evaluation and Burst Testing
This study evaluated the performance of the speculum sleeve’s expandable pouches and determined the burst volume and burst pressure for the pouches.
{7}
K252208
Page 4 of 4
# Pull Force and Elongation Testing
This study determined the maximum pull forces and elongation that the speculum sleeve can withstand to ensure the device does not tear or break when stretched during clinical use.
# Reliability Testing
This study demonstrated that under simulated use conditions the speculum sleeve can withstand the pressures exerted on it without leaking or bursting.
# Pouch Pressure Testing
This study demonstrated that the speculum sleeve's expandable pouches do not exert a pressure greater than 60mmHg over the pouch area. The pouches exert minimal pressure when inflated with the maximum volume of fluid under simulated use conditions.
# Chemical Solution Compatibility Study
The speculum sleeve was tested and found compatible with the following chemical solutions:
- Acetic acid 5%
- Betadine Solution
- Chlorhexidine 4%
- Lugol's Iodine Solution 5%
- Monsel's Solution (Ferric Subsulfate)
- Saline Solution (0.9%)
- Silver Nitrate
- Water-based Lubricant
This study demonstrated that the speculum sleeve is compatible and chemically resistant to these common solutions it may come in contact with during clinical use. Trichloroacetic Acid at 95% and 10% concentrations was not deemed compatible with the speculum sleeve due to potential material degradation.
# Summative Usability Testing
A summative usability validation study was performed to demonstrate that the speculum sleeve can be used by intended users without serious use errors or problems, for the intended use and under the expected conditions of use. The results of this study demonstrate the speculum sleeve is safe and effective for its intended use with minimal self-learning. No new risks were identified during the study and there were no use errors or problems that could result in serious harm which could be eliminated or mitigated through design modifications.
# 8. Conclusions
The non-clinical performance data confirm that the subject device performs as intended and is as safe and effective as the predicate. Thus, the equivalence assessment and performance data demonstrate substantial equivalence to the predicate in terms of safety and effectiveness.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.