AI/ML, Software as a Medical Device, Real-World Evidence
Real-World Evidence
Submission
Device
Sponsor
RWD Sources
RWE Use Summary
Key Tags
K252190 · Apr 10, 2026
DeepBT Detector-Plus
Aitewan Biomedical Technology, Inc.
Retrospective clinical medical records/imaging datasets from 16 medical institutions
Retrospective clinical data was used to train the AI model and to conduct a standalone performance study evaluating the device's ability to contour brain tumors compared to a ground-truth consensus.
Retrospective study; Multicenter; AI model training; Standalone performance evaluation
Clinical Evidence
Study Design
Population
Comparator
Key Endpoints
Model Training Dataset; Retrospective cohort; Follow-up/Duration: 1999-2022; Study Period: 1999-2022
Adult patients with acoustic neuroma, meningioma, and brain metastasis who underwent Gamma Knife radiosurgery; Sample Size: 2,867 patients; Number of Sites: 2
Not applicable for this study
AI model training for GTV contouring
Standalone Performance Study; Multicenter, multinational, retrospective standalone performance study
Adult patients with brain metastases, meningiomas, and acoustic neuromas; Sample Size: 136 cases (360 tumors); Number of Sites: 16
Ground truth established by consensus of three US board-certified radiologists
Bi-parametric: 3.2% (95% CI: 2.3% to 4.0%); Single-parametric: 5.2% (95% CI: 2.8% to 7.6%)
2,867 patients (510 acoustic neuroma, 1,180 meningioma, 1,177 brain metastasis) collected from two medical centers in Taiwan between 1999 and 2022.
—
Multicenter, multinational, retrospective standalone performance study of 136 cases with 360 tumors from 16 institutions (15 US, 1 non-US).
3 (US board-certified radiologists)
Indications for Use
DeepBT Detector-Plus is a software system intended to assist trained medical professionals, during their clinical workflows of radiation therapy treatment planning, by providing initial object contours of diagnosed brain tumors (i.e., region of interest, ROI). The system can utilize both axial T1-weighted contrast-enhanced brain MRI images (T1W+C) and T2-weighted (T2W) MRI images, allowing the model to reference both imaging sequences simultaneously. The generated contours are applied on the T1W+C images, which serve as the primary imaging reference for radiation therapy treatment planning. DeepBT Detector-Plus, which utilizes an artificial intelligence algorithm (i.e., deep learning neural networks), is intended to be used only on adult patients for generating Gross Tumor Volume (GTV) contours of brain metastases, meningiomas, and acoustic neuromas; It is not intended to be used with images of other types of brain tumors. When inputting images, DeepBT Detector-Plus can take either single-parameter images (T1W+C) or bi-parameter images (T1W+C and T2W) for interpretation. Medical professionals must finalize (confirm or modify) the contours generated by DeepBT Detector-Plus using an external platform available at the facility that supports DICOM-compatible viewing and editing, such as a Treatment Planning System (TPS) or a DICOM-compliant workstation, before using them for treatment.
Device Story
DeepBT Detector-Plus is an AI-based software system for radiation therapy treatment planning; assists clinicians by generating initial Gross Tumor Volume (GTV) contours for brain metastases, meningiomas, and acoustic neuromas. Input: axial T1-weighted contrast-enhanced (T1W+C) MRI images, optionally with T2-weighted (T2W) MRI images. Operation: deep learning neural networks analyze images to segment tumors; outputs contours in DICOM Presentation State (PR) and Radiotherapy Structure Sets (RTSS) formats. Workflow: integrated into PACS network; retrieves scans, processes via AI module, and exports results to third-party DICOM-compliant workstations or Treatment Planning Systems (TPS). Clinicians must review, confirm, or modify generated contours before clinical use. Benefits: provides automated initial segmentation to support efficient treatment planning workflows.
Clinical Evidence
Retrospective, multicenter, multinational standalone performance study using 136 cases (360 tumors) from 16 institutions. Ground truth established by three board-certified neuroradiologists. Metrics: lesion-wise sensitivity (88.6% bi-parametric; 88.3% single-parametric), false positive rate (0.537/case bi-parametric; 0.787/case single-parametric), lesion-wise Dice coefficient (0.809 bi-parametric; 0.804 single-parametric), balanced average Hausdorff distance, and centroid distance. Results demonstrate performance comparable to predicate.
Technological Characteristics
Software-only device; runs on Linux OS. Uses deep learning neural networks for image segmentation. Inputs: T1W+C and T2W MRI images. Outputs: DICOM PR and RTSS objects. Connectivity: PACS network integration. Software V&V follows Enhanced Documentation Level per FDA guidance; compliant with IEC 62304 and ISO 14971.
Indications for Use
Indicated for adult patients with diagnosed brain metastases, meningiomas, or acoustic neuromas. Not for use with other brain tumor types.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A medical image management and processing system is a device that provides one or more capabilities relating to the review and digital processing of medical images for the purposes of interpretation by a trained practitioner of disease detection, diagnosis, or patient management. The software components may provide advanced or complex image processing functions for image manipulation, enhancement, or quantification that are intended for use in the interpretation and analysis of medical images. Advanced image manipulation functions may include image segmentation, multimodality image registration, or 3D visualization. Complex quantitative functions may include semi-automated measurements or time-series measurements.
Special Controls
*Classification.* Class II (special controls; voluntary standards—Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) Std., Joint Photographic Experts Group (JPEG) Std., Society of Motion Picture and Television Engineers (SMPTE) Test Pattern).
{0}
FDA U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION
April 10, 2026
Altewan BioMedical Technology Inc.
Ya-Xuan Yang
7F., No. 1, Yumin 6th Rd., Beitou Dist.
Taipei,
Taiwan
Re: K252190
Trade/Device Name: DeepBT Detector-Plus
Regulation Number: 21 CFR 892.2050
Regulation Name: Medical Image Management And Processing System
Regulatory Class: Class II
Product Code: QKB
Dated: July 14, 2025
Received: July 14, 2025
Dear Ya-Xuan Yang:
We have reviewed your section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database available at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
U.S. Food & Drug Administration
10903 New Hampshire Avenue
Silver Spring, MD 20993
www.fda.gov
{1}
K252190 - Ya-Xuan Yang
Page 2
Additional information about changes that may require a new premarket notification are provided in the FDA guidance documents entitled "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99812/download) and "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Software Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99785/download).
Your device is also subject to, among other requirements, the Quality Management System Regulation (QMSR) (21 CFR Part 820), which includes, but is not limited to, ISO 13485 clause 7.3 (Design controls), ISO 13485 clause 8.3 (Nonconforming product), ISO 13485 clause 8.5.2 (Corrective action), and ISO 13485 clause 8.5.3 (Preventative action). Please note that regardless of whether a change requires premarket review, the QMSR requires device manufacturers to review and approve changes to device design and production (ISO 13485 clause 7.3 and ISO 13485 clause 7.5) and document changes and approvals in the Medical Device File (ISO 13485 clause 4.2.3).
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR Part 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reporting-combination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the Quality Management System Regulation (QMSR) (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR Parts 1000-1050.
All medical devices, including Class I and unclassified devices and combination product device constituent parts are required to be in compliance with the final Unique Device Identification System rule ("UDI Rule"). The UDI Rule requires, among other things, that a device bear a unique device identifier (UDI) on its label and package (21 CFR 801.20(a)) unless an exception or alternative applies (21 CFR 801.20(b)) and that the dates on the device label be formatted in accordance with 21 CFR 801.18. The UDI Rule (21 CFR 830.300(a) and 830.320(b)) also requires that certain information be submitted to the Global Unique Device Identification Database (GUDID) (21 CFR Part 830 Subpart E). For additional information on these requirements, please see the UDI System webpage at https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance/unique-device-identification-system-udi-system.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reporting-mdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about medical devices and radiation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-
{2}
K252190 - Ya-Xuan Yang
Page 3
assistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,

Lora D. Weidner, Ph.D.
Assistant Director
Radiation Therapy Team
DHT8C: Division of Radiological
Imaging and Radiation Therapy Devices
OHT8: Office of Radiological Health
Office of Product Evaluation and Quality
Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{3}
FORM FDA 3881 (8/23)
Page 1 of 1
PSC Publishing Services (301) 443-6740
EF
| DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Food and Drug Administration Indications for Use | Form Approved: OMB No. 0910-0120 Expiration Date: 07/31/2026 See PRA Statement below. |
| --- | --- |
| 510(k) Number (if known) K252190 | |
| Device Name DeepBT Detector-Plus | |
| Indications for Use (Describe) DeepBT Detector-Plus is a software system intended to assist trained medical professionals, during their clinical workflows of radiation therapy treatment planning, by providing initial object contours of diagnosed brain tumors (i.e., region of interest, ROI). The system can utilize both axial T1-weighted contrast-enhanced brain MRI images (T1W+C) and T2-weighted (T2W) MRI images, allowing the model to reference both imaging sequences simultaneously. The generated contours are applied on the T1W+C images, which serve as the primary imaging reference for radiation therapy treatment planning. DeepBT Detector-Plus, which utilizes an artificial intelligence algorithm (i.e., deep learning neural networks), is intended to be used only on adult patients for generating Gross Tumor Volume (GTV) contours of brain metastases, meningiomas, and acoustic neuromas; It is not intended to be used with images of other types of brain tumors. When inputting images, DeepBT Detector-Plus can take either single-parameter images (T1W+C) or bi-parameter images (T1W+C and T2W) for interpretation. Medical professionals must finalize (confirm or modify) the contours generated by DeepBT Detector-Plus using an external platform available at the facility that supports DICOM-compatible viewing and editing, such as a Treatment Planning System (TPS) or a DICOM-compliant workstation, before using them for treatment. | |
| Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable) ☑ Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) ☐ Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C) | |
| CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED. | |
| This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. "DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW." | |
| The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to: Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov | |
| "An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number." | |
{4}
Altewan
Altewan BioMedical Technology Incorporation | 510(k) Summary – K252190
# 510(k) Summary – K252190
## 1. Submitter
| Submitter | Altewan BioMedical Technology Inc. |
| --- | --- |
| Address | 7F., No. 1, Yumin 6th Rd., Beitou Dist.
Taipei City 112042, Taiwan (R.O.C) |
| Contact Person | Wan-Yuo Guo, M.D., Ph.D. (President) |
| Contact Information | 886-2-2826-7169
ra.dept@aitewan-bio.com |
| Date Prepared | April 10, 2026 |
## 2. Proposed Device
| Trade Name | DeepBT Detector-Plus |
| --- | --- |
| Common Name | Radiological image processing software for radiation therapy |
| Classification Name | Medical image management and processing system |
| Regulatory Number | 21 CFR 892.2050 |
| Product Code | QKB |
| Regulatory Class | Class II |
## 3. Predicate Device
Predicate Device: VBrain, K203235, Vysioneer Inc.
## 4. Device Description
DeepBT Detector-Plus is an Artificial Intelligence (AI) software system which consists of a Web User Interface (Web UI) and a Brain Tumor AI Contouring module. The Web UI allows users to select medical images and submits them to the Brain Tumor AI contouring module for processing. Based on the magnetic resonance (MR) images selected by the user, the AI contouring module performs inferences for three types of brain tumors (acoustic neuroma, meningioma, and brain
DeepBT Detector-Plus | Traditional 510(k)
Page 1 of 9
{5}
Altewan
Altewan BioMedical Technology Incorporation | 510(k) Summary - K252190
metastasis) and provides the contouring result. The result is provided in DICOM Presentation State (PR) and Radiotherapy Structure Sets (RTSS) format for DICOM-compliant systems.
DeepBT Detector-Plus accepts T1-weighted contrast-enhanced (T1W+C) MR images and T2-weighted (T2W) MR images. When inputting images, the software can handle either single parametric MR images (T1W+C) or bi-parametric images (T1W+C and T2W) without requiring manual preprocessing or labeling. It automatically analyzes the images and provides contours of brain tumors (acoustic neuroma, meningioma, and brain metastasis).
The software is configured to work on a PACS network. Upon a user's request, it retrieves patient scans and sends them to the Brain Tumor AI Contouring module. The device then utilizes deep learning neural networks to generate brain tumor contours. The results are exported as DICOM PR and DICOM RT Structure Set (RTSS) objects and sent back to the network. These objects allow medical professionals to view or edit the contours on third-party software systems that adhere to the DICOM standard, such as treatment planning systems (TPS) or picture archiving and communication systems (PACS). Medical professionals must finalize (confirm or modify) the contours generated by DeepBT Detector-Plus before using them for treatment.
# 5. Indication for Use
DeepBT Detector-Plus is a software system intended to assist trained medical professionals, during their clinical workflows of radiation therapy treatment planning, by providing initial object contours of diagnosed brain tumors (i.e., region of interest, ROI). The system can utilize both axial T1-weighted contrast-enhanced brain MRI images (T1W+C) and T2-weighted (T2W) MRI images, allowing the model to reference both imaging sequences simultaneously. The generated contours are applied on the T1W+C images, which serve as the primary imaging reference for radiation therapy treatment planning.
DeepBT Detector-Plus, which utilizes an artificial intelligence algorithm (i.e., deep learning neural networks), is intended to be used only on adult patients for generating Gross Tumor Volume (GTV) contours of brain metastases, meningiomas, and acoustic neuromas; It is not intended to be used with images of other types of brain tumors. When inputting images, DeepBT Detector-Plus can take either single-parameter images (T1W+C) or bi-parameter images (T1W+C and T2W) for interpretation.
Medical professionals must finalize (confirm or modify) the contours generated by DeepBT Detector-Plus using an external platform available at the facility that supports DICOM-compatible viewing and editing, such as a Treatment Planning System (TPS) or a DICOM-compliant workstation, before using them for treatment.
DeepBT Detector-Plus | Traditional 510(k)
Page 2 of 9
{6}
Altewan
Altewan BioMedical Technology Incorporation | 510(k) Summary - K252190
# 6. Comparison of Technological Characteristics with Predicate Device
DeepBT Detector-Plus is substantially equivalent to the predicate device VBrain (K203235).
The proposed device, DeepBT Detector-Plus, and the predicate, VBrain, are both software devices that utilize deep learning algorithms for brain tumor detection and contouring, focusing on the same three types of brain tumors: brain metastases, meningiomas, and acoustic neuromas. Both systems are designed to assist in radiation therapy treatment planning. They integrate with PACS networks, enabling automated tumor contouring, and output results in DICOM standard formats, allowing medical professionals to view or edit the contours using DICOM-compatible third-party systems.
The only difference between the two products is that DeepBT Detector-Plus can perform AI model inference based on single-parametric MR images (T1W+C) as well as bi-parametric MR images (T1W+C and T2W). Since T2W images can provide higher signal intensity in certain cases, such as cystic tumors, they offer improved tumor boundary identification, allowing DeepBT Detector-Plus to deliver more accurate tumor contours. In contrast, VBrain supports only single-parametric images (T1W+C). However, both products focus on the same tumor types and intended clinical use, and there is no fundamental difference in their clinical applications.
Although there are differences in technical characteristics, the performance of DeepBT Detector-Plus on both single-parametric and bi-parametric images has been validated, and the results are comparable to those of the predicate device. Furthermore, the contours predicted by both products require confirmation or modification by medical professionals before they can be used for treatment planning. The information provided by both products is intended as support and does not aim to alter the clinical workflow of medical professionals. Therefore, the new product does not raise any new concerns regarding substantial equivalence.
Please refer to Table 1 for a comparison of the intended use and key technical characteristics of the proposed device and the predicate device.
Table 1. Comparison with Predicate Device
| Item | Proposed Device | Predicate Device |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Company | Altewan BioMedical Technology Inc. | Vysioneer Inc. |
| Device Name | DeepBT Detector-Plus | VBrain |
| 510(k) Number | Pending | K203235 |
DeepBT Detector-Plus | Traditional 510(k)
{7}
Altewan
Altewan BioMedical Technology Incorporation | 510(k) Summary – K252190
| Regulation No. | 21 CFR 892.2050 | 21 CFR 892.2050 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Classification | II | II |
| Product Code | QKB | QKB |
| Intended Use/Indication of Use | DeepBT Detector-Plus is a software system intended to assist trained medical professionals, during their clinical workflows of radiation therapy treatment planning, by providing initial object contours of diagnosed brain tumors (i.e., region of interest, ROI). The system can utilize both axial T1-weighted contrast-enhanced brain MRI images (T1W+C) and T2-weighted (T2W) MRI images, allowing the model to reference both imaging sequences simultaneously for improved accuracy. The generated contours are applied on the T1W+C images, which serve as the primary imaging reference for radiation therapy treatment planning.
DeepBT Detector-Plus, which utilizes an artificial intelligence algorithm (i.e., deep learning neural networks), is intended to be used only on adult patients for generating Gross Tumor Volume (GTV) contours of brain metastases, meningiomas, and acoustic neuromas; It is not intended to be used with images of other types of brain tumors. When inputting images, DeepBT Detector-Plus can take either single-parameter images (T1W+C) or bi-parameter images (T1W+C and T2W) for interpretation. | VBrain is a software device intended to assist trained medical professionals, during their clinical workflows of radiation therapy treatment planning, by providing initial object contours of known (diagnosed) brain tumors (i.e., region of interest, ROI) on axial T1 contrast-enhanced brain MRI images.
VBrain uses an artificial intelligence algorithm (i.e., deep learning neural networks) to contour (segment) brain tumor on MRI images for trained medical professionals’ attention, which is meant for informational purposes only and not intended for replacing their current standard practice of manual contouring process. VBrain does not alter the original MRI image, nor does it intend to be used to detect tumors for diagnosis. VBrain is intended only for generating Gross Tumor Volume (GTV) contours of brain metastases, meningiomas, and acoustic neuromas on axial T1 contrast-enhanced MRI images; It is not intended to be used with images of other brain tumors. The user must know the tumor |
DeepBT Detector-Plus | Traditional 510(k)
Page 4 of 9
{8}
Altewan
Altewan BioMedical Technology Incorporation | 510(k) Summary - K252190
| | Medical professionals must finalize (confirm or modify) the contours generated by DeepBT Detector-Plus using an external platform available at the facility that supports DICOM-compatible viewing and editing, such as a Treatment Planning System (TPS) or a DICOM-compliant workstation, before using them for treatment. | type when they use VBrain. VBrain is intended to be used on adult patients only.
Medical professionals must finalize (confirm or modify) the contours generated by VBrain, as necessary, using an external platform available at the facility that supports DICOM-RT viewing/editing functions, such as image visualization software and treatment planning system. |
| --- | --- | --- |
| **Segmentation (Contouring) Technology** | Deep learning | Deep learning |
| **Operating System** | Linux operating system | Linux operating system |
| **User Population** | Trained medical professionals include, but are not limited to, radiation oncologists, neurosurgeons, and radiologists. | Trained medical professionals including, but not limited to, radiologists, oncologists, physicians, medical technologists, dosimetrists, and physicists. |
| **Supported Modalities** | Axial T1-weighted contrast-enhanced brain MRI images (T1W+C) and T2-weighted (T2W) MRI images can be used. The system can accept either T1W+C images alone or both T1W+C and T2W images simultaneously. | Axial T1 contrast-enhanced MRI images |
| **Localization and Definition of Objects (ROI)** | Qualified brain tumors - brain metastases, meningiomas, and acoustic neuromas. | Qualified brain tumors - brain metastases, meningiomas, and acoustic neuromas. |
DeepBT Detector-Plus | Traditional 510(k)
Page 5 of 9
{9}
Altewan
Altewan BioMedical Technology Incorporation | 510(k) Summary - K252190
| Performance Testing | To evaluate the standalone analytical performance of DeepBT Detector-Plus in detecting and contouring brain tumors on T1-weighted contrast-enhanced (T1W+C) and T2-weighted (T2W) magnetic resonance (MR) images, and to demonstrate Substantial Equivalence (SE) to the predicate, Altewan conducted a multicenter, multinational, retrospective standalone performance study. The test dataset consisted of 136 cases with 360 tumors, acquired from 16 different institutions (15 in the US and 1 non-US). The performance of DeepBT Detector-Plus was assessed based on single-parameter MR images (T1W+C) and bi-parametric MR images (T1W+C and T2W).
The evaluation involved comparing tumor contouring results from DeepBT Detector-Plus with ground truth using five metrics: (1) lesion-wise sensitivity, (2) false positive rate, (3) lesion-wise Dice coefficient, (4) balanced average Hausdorff distance, and (5) centroid distance. The results demonstrate that the performance of the proposed device is comparable with that of the predicate device.
Software verification and validation testing were conducted, and documentation was provided following the FDA’s Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff, “Content of Premarket Submissions for Device Software Functions” for software devices identified as “Enhanced Documentation | To support the intended use of the VBrain AI software for brain tumor contouring (segmentation) performance, Vysioneer conducted a retrospective, blinded, multicenter, multinational study with VBrain. The test dataset comprised 116 cases with 238 tumors acquired from 4 institutions (3 in the US and 1 non-US).
The evaluation involved five metrics: (1) lesion-wise sensitivity, (2) false-positive rate, (3) lesion-wise Dice coefficient, (4) average Hausdorff distance, and (5) average centroid distance between VBrain’s segmentation and clinicians’ segmentation. All the metrics were demonstrated to pass the performance goals.
Software verification and validation testing were conducted, and documentation was provided following the FDA’s Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff, “Guidance for the Content of Premarket Submissions for Software Contained in Medical Devices” for software devices identified as Major Level of Concern related to radiation therapy treatment planning. |
| --- | --- | --- |
DeepBT Detector-Plus | Traditional 510(k)
Page 6 of 9
{10}
Altewan
Altewan BioMedical Technology Incorporation | 510(k) Summary - K252190
| | Level”. | |
| --- | --- | --- |
# 7. Performance Data
## 7.1 Software Verification and Validation
Software verification and validation (V&V) testing were performed, and the corresponding documentation was provided in accordance with the FDA guidance, "Content of Premarket Submissions for Device Software Functions," issued on June 14, 2023, adhering to the Enhanced Documentation Level for software functions related to radiation therapy treatment planning.
In addition, the following standards have also been consulted during the software V&V activities:
- IEC 62304:2006/A1:2016 Medical device software - Software life cycle processes
- ISO 14971:2019 Medical devices - Applications of risk management to medical device
The Software V&V activities and documentation are based on the Enhanced Documentation Level.
## 7.2 Training Dataset
The DeepBT Detector-Plus model was trained on a retrospective dataset comprising 2,867 patients, including 510 cases of acoustic neuroma, 1,180 cases of meningioma, and 1,177 cases of brain metastasis. All patients underwent Gamma Knife radiosurgery. The training dataset included imaging acquired at the time of treatment for all patients, and follow-up imaging when available. The dataset was collected from two major medical centers in Taiwan between 1999 and 2022.
## 7.3 Standalone Performance Testing
Altewan conducted a multicenter, multinational, retrospective study to evaluate the standalone analytical performance of the artificial intelligence software for assisting in brain tumor contouring on T1W+C and T2W MR imaging. The test dataset consisted of 136 cases with 360 lesions, retrospectively collected from 16 different institutions (15 in the US and 1 non-US). The ground truth was established by the consensus of three US board-certified radiologists with fellowship training in neuroradiology or MRI with at least five years of post-fellowship experience.
By comparing tumor contouring between DeepBT Detector-Plus and the ground truth, five metrics were evaluated: (1) lesion-wise sensitivity, (2) false positive rate, (3) lesion-wise Dice coefficient, (4) balanced average Hausdorff distance (bAHD), and (5) centroid distance of DeepBT Detector-Plus’s inference results for the brain tumors.
DeepBT Detector-Plus | Traditional 510(k)
Page 7 of 9
{11}
Altewan
Altewan BioMedical Technology Incorporation | 510(k) Summary - K252190
The standalone performance evaluation was conducted using a pre-specified statistical analysis plan. Lesion-wise sensitivity was used for sample size determination based on a statistical hypothesis testing approach. Performance of DeepBT Detector-Plus was evaluated by comparison to the predicate device across multiple metrics, including lesion-wise sensitivity, false positive rate, lesion-wise Dice coefficient, and centroid distance. A predefined success threshold for bAHD was established as $\leq 5.6\%$ , based on the upper bound of the $95\%$ confidence interval of the predicate device's average Hausdorff distance.
The tables below present the performance of DeepBT Detector-Plus in tumor detection and contouring across five metrics, evaluated using bi-parametric MR images (Table 2) and single-parametric MR images (Table 3).
Additional subgroup analyses were performed by MRI manufacturer, tumor type, lesion size, and MRI image voxel size. MRI manufacturers included major vendors such as GE, Philips, Siemens, Hitachi, and other manufacturers. Tumor types included acoustic neuroma, meningioma, and brain metastasis. Lesion size was categorized into three groups: $\leq 10\mathrm{mm}$ , $>10$ to $\leq 20\mathrm{mm}$ , and $>20\mathrm{mm}$ . MRI image voxel size was categorized into $\leq 1\mathrm{mm}^3$ and $>1\mathrm{mm}^3$ .
Performance was generally consistent across the evaluated tumor types, major MRI manufacturers, and MRI image voxel size subgroups within the validated ranges. Greater performance variability was observed for small lesions ( $\leq 10 \mathrm{~mm}$ ), which may be related to technical challenges such as limited spatial resolution and partial-volume effects in clinical MRI.
The demographic distribution of the dataset:
Sex: 92 Female, 44 Male
- Age: Adult, range from 27 to 99 years old; the average age is 66.8 years old with a standard deviation of 13.4
Race: 65 White, 38 Asian, 1 Black, and 32 Unknown
Note: Race data were not available for all cases due to anonymization.
Table 2. Performance data of bi-parametric MR images (T1W+C and T2W)
| Performance Metrics | Overall Value | 95% Confidence Interval |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Lesion-wise Sensitivity | 88.6% | 85.3% to 91.9% |
| False Positive Rate | 0.537 tumors/case | 0.453 to 0.621 |
| Lesion-wise Dice Coefficient | 0.809 | 0.793 to 0.824 |
| Balanced Average Hausdorff Distance | 3.2% | 2.3% to 4.0% |
| Centroid Distance | 5.8% | 4.9% to 6.7% |
DeepBT Detector-Plus | Traditional 510(k)
{12}
Altewan
Altewan BioMedical Technology Incorporation | 510(k) Summary - K252190
Table 3. Performance data of single-parametric MR images (T1W+C)
| Performance Metrics | Overall Value | 95% Confidence Interval |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Lesion-wise Sensitivity | 88.3% | 85.0% to 91.6% |
| False Positive Rate | 0.787 tumors/case | 0.718 to 0.856 |
| Lesion-wise Dice Coefficient | 0.804 | 0.788 to 0.820 |
| Balanced Average Hausdorff Distance | 5.2% | 2.8% to 7.6% |
| Centroid Distance | 7.2% | 5.6% to 8.8% |
# 8. Conclusions
Based on the information provided in this premarket notification, including the intended use, technological characteristics, and performance testing results, the data demonstrate that DeepBT Detector-Plus is substantially equivalent to the predicate device.
DeepBT Detector-Plus | Traditional 510(k)
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.