The LANDR Contact Lens Case is designed for storing soft (hydrophilic), rigid gas-permeable, and/or rigid contact lenses. It is only for use during storage with chemical disinfection and should not be used during heat disinfection.
Device Story
LANDR Contact Lens Case is a dual-sided storage container for contact lenses; features two detachable, color-coded compartments stacked together via a ball plunger mechanism for shipping. User separates compartments and places them on a flat surface; lenses are stored in multipurpose solution with lids closed. Device is intended for over-the-counter use by contact lens wearers. Provides a secure, upright environment for chemical disinfection of lenses. Benefits include ease of identification through color-coding and portability.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. Performance testing included simulated leak tests for 8-hour storage in various orientations. Biocompatibility testing conducted per ISO 10993 standards: Acute Systemic Injection Test (ISO 10993-11), Elution Cytotoxicity Test (ISO 10993-5, Grade 0 reactivity), and Ocular Irritation Test (ISO 10993-23, no reactivity).
Technological Characteristics
Material: Polypropylene. Design: Dual-sided, detachable compartments with screw-down lids. Volume: 3.85 ml max fill. Biocompatibility: ISO 10993-5, ISO 10993-10/23, ISO 10993-11 compliant.
Indications for Use
Indicated for storage of soft (hydrophilic), rigid gas-permeable, and rigid contact lenses during chemical disinfection. Not for use with heat disinfection.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A soft (hydrophilic) contact lens care product is a device intended for use in the cleaning, rinsing, disinfecting, lubricating/rewetting, or storing of a soft (hydrophilic) contact lens. This includes all solutions and tablets used together with soft (hydrophilic) contact lenses and heat disinfecting units intended to disinfect a soft (hydrophilic) contact lens by means of heat.
Special Controls
*Classification.* Class II (Special Controls) Guidance Document: “Guidance for Industry Premarket Notification (510(k)) Guidance Document for Contact Lens Care Products.”
{0}
FDA U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION
February 10, 2026
Fourth Axis LLC
Srinagesh Koushik
Managing Partner
BDRA Consulting LLC
1 Clearewater Court
Damascus, MD 20872
Re: K252175
Trade/Device Name: LANDR Contact LENS Case
Regulation Number: 21 CFR 886.5928
Regulation Name: Soft (Hydrophilic) Contact Lens Care Products
Regulatory Class: Class II
Product Code: LRX
Dated: January 12, 2026
Received: January 12, 2026
Dear Srinagesh Koushik:
We have reviewed your section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database available at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
U.S. Food & Drug Administration
10903 New Hampshire Avenue
Silver Spring, MD 20993
www.fda.gov
{1}
K252175 - Srinagesh Koushik
Page 2
Additional information about changes that may require a new premarket notification are provided in the FDA guidance documents entitled "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99812/download) and "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Software Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99785/download).
Your device is also subject to, among other requirements, the Quality Management System Regulation (QMSR) (21 CFR Part 820), which includes, but is not limited to, ISO 13485 clause 7.3 (Design controls), ISO 13484 clause 8.3 (Nonconforming product), and ISO 13485 clause 8.5 (Corrective and preventative action). Please note that regardless of whether a change requires premarket review, the QMSR requires device manufacturers to review and approve changes to device design and production (ISO 13485 clause 7.3 and 21 CFR 820.70) and document changes and approvals in the device master record (21 CFR 820.181).
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR Part 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reporting-combination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the Quality Management System Regulation (QMSR) (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR Parts 1000-1050.
All medical devices, including Class I and unclassified devices and combination product device constituent parts are required to be in compliance with the final Unique Device Identification System rule ("UDI Rule"). The UDI Rule requires, among other things, that a device bear a unique device identifier (UDI) on its label and package (21 CFR 801.20(a)) unless an exception or alternative applies (21 CFR 801.20(b)) and that the dates on the device label be formatted in accordance with 21 CFR 801.18. The UDI Rule (21 CFR 830.300(a) and 830.320(b)) also requires that certain information be submitted to the Global Unique Device Identification Database (GUDID) (21 CFR Part 830 Subpart E). For additional information on these requirements, please see the UDI System webpage at https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance/unique-device-identification-system-udi-system.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reporting-mdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about medical devices and radiation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn).
{2}
K252175 - Srinagesh Koushik
Page 3
Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
J Angelo Green -S
J. Angelo Green, Ph.D.
Assistant Director
DHT1A: Division of Ophthalmic Devices
OHT1: Office of Ophthalmic, Anesthesia, Respiratory, ENT, and Dental Devices
Office of Product Evaluation and Quality
Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{3}
| Indications for Use | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Please type in the marketing application/submission number, if it is known. This textbox will be left blank for original applications/submissions. | K252175 | ? |
| Please provide the device trade name(s). | | ? |
| LANDR Contact LENS Case | | |
| Please provide your Indications for Use below. | | ? |
| The LANDR Contact Lens Case is designed for storing soft (hydrophilic), rigid gas-permeable, and/or rigid contact lenses. It is only for use during storage with chemical disinfection and should not be used during heat disinfection. | | |
| Please select the types of uses (select one or both, as applicable). | ☐ Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
☑ Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C) | ? |
{4}
510k Summary
K252175
This summary of 510(k) safety and effectiveness information is being submitted in accordance with the requirements of 21 CFR 807.92.
Manufacturer:
Fourth Axis LLC
For Fourth Axis LLC
By:
InnoSeek Limited
Building 4, No. 3
Fuxing Fourth Street, Shunyi District,
Beijing, 101300, P.R.China
Submission Correspondent: Srinagesh Koushik, Ph.D., RAC.
Address: BDRA Consulting LLC.
1 Clearwater Court, Damascus, MD 20872.
Email: shree@bdraqa.com
Phone: 30192273231
Date of Submission: 2 February, 2025
Device Information:
Proprietary Name: LANDR Contact Lens Case
Device Classification Name: Contact Lens Case
Device Classification: Class II
Regulation Number: 21 CFR 886.5928
Product Code: LRX
Classification Panel: Ophthalmic
Predicate Device:
Proprietary Name: CAREUS Contact Lens Case
Device Classification Name: Contact Lens Case
Device Classification: Class II
Regulation Number: 21 CFR 886.5928
Product Code: LRX
Classification Panel: Ophthalmic
{5}
# Intended Use:
The LANDR Contact Lens Case is designed for storing soft (hydrophilic), rigid gas-permeable, and/or rigid contact lenses. It is only for use during storage with chemical disinfection and should not be used during heat disinfection.
# Indications:
The LANDR Contact Lens Case is designed for storing soft (hydrophilic), rigid gas-permeable, and/or rigid contact lenses. It is only for use during storage with chemical disinfection and should not be used during heat disinfection.
# Device Description:
The LANDR Lens Case has dual-sided storage compartments (one per lens) stacked together (Figure 1). The case uses a ball plunger to hold the detachable cases together in one piece during shipping. Each compartment is colored to differentiate the cases.

Figure 1. Pictures of the LANDR Contact Lens Case as shipped
The individual cases should be separated by pulling them apart and placing them on a flat surface right side up before use (Figure 2). When disinfecting and storing contact lenses, each case must be kept upright on a flat surface in the correct orientation (Figure 2) with the lids securely closed.

Figure 2: Correct orientation to store the lenses in multipurpose solution
{6}

Figure 3: Shows contact lenses in universal storage solution on a flat surface
{7}
# Substantial Equivalence:
The following table shows the similarities and differences between the predicate and subject devices.
| Description | LANDR (K252175) | CAREUS (K240095) | SE Comparison |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Intended Use | The LANDR Contact Lens Case is designed for storing soft (hydrophilic), gas-permeable, and/or rigid contact lenses. It is only for use during storage with chemical disinfection and should not be used during heat disinfection. | “CAREUS Contact Lens Case” is a device intended for the storage of soft (hydrophilic), rigid gas permeable, and/or hard contact lenses. Used for storage during chemical disinfection only. Not for use during heat disinfection. | SE |
| Design | Two wells with screw down lids, that can be connected for carrying ease | Two adjoining wells with screw down lids | SE |
| Material | Polypropylene | Polypropylene | SE |
| Size | Single | Various | SE |
| Volume | 3.85 ml max fill | 3.8-4.5ml | SE |
| Colors | Two colors in every device. Each well is a different color coded for easy identification. The device is sold in a single color combination | Nine different colors | |
{8}
| Description | LANDR (K252175) | CAREUS (K240095) | SE Comparision |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Biocompatibility | Cytotoxicity (ISO 10993-5)
Irritation & Sensitivity (ISO 10993-10)
Systemic Toxicity (ISO 10993-11) | Same | SE |
| Performance Testing | The lens case passed simulated leak tests for 8 hours storage, including evaluating leaks when cases where stored upside down. Lens cases passed leak tests. | | SE |
The devices have a similar intended use, and both are manufactured using polypropylene. Both devices are intended to be used upright on a flat surface while storing contact lenses. While there are some differences in basic design and colors, they do not affect the safety and performance of the device.
# Biocompatibility and Performance Tests:
The lens case passed simulated leak tests for 8 hours of storage, including evaluating leaks when cases were stored upside down. Lens cases passed leak tests.
The LANDR case was tested according to the requirements outlined in the FDA guidance document, Use of International Standard ISO 10993-1, "Biological evaluation of medical devices—Part 1: Evaluation and testing within a risk management process." Additionally, the special controls document, Guidance Document for Contact Lens Care Products," specifies that the toxicology data from the following tests on both the plastic and gasket materials should be provided:
1. Systemic Toxicity Test
2. Acute Ocular Irritation Test
{9}
3. In-Vitro Cytotoxicity Test
The components used to manufacture LANDR cases are commonly utilized in the production of medical devices. For more information, please refer to the Biocompatibility section of this submission.
The summary of biocompatibility testing results is provided in the table below.
| Test Conducted | Results | Conclusion |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Acute Systemic Injection Test. ISO 10993-11 Compliant | No significant difference in biological reactivity between groups and their corresponding controls. | LANDR did not demonstrate Acute Systemic toxicity based on results of the Acute Systemic Injection Test. |
| Elution Cytotoxicity Test (In Vitro). ISO 10993-5 Compliant. | The test article did not exhibit reactivity (grade 0) as evidenced by the presence of normal, healthy confluent cells. | LANDR Case did not induce cytotoxicity (grade 0). |
| Occular Irritation Test. ISO 10993-23 compliant. | The test article did not exhibit reactivity. | LANDR case is not considered an eye irritant in the Ocular irritation test. |
Conclusion:
The LANDR Case meets the biocompatibility and labeling requirements outlined in Section G. Contact Lens Cases of the Guidance for Industry—Premarket Notification (510(k) Guidance Document for Contact Lens Care Products).
In accordance with 21 CFR Part 801 and based on the information provided in support of this 510(k), Fourt Axis LLC believes the LANDR Contact Lens Case is substantially equivalent to the predicate.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.