K252084 · Ai4medimaging Medical Solutions S.A. · QIH · Feb 11, 2026 · Radiology
Device Facts
Record ID
K252084
Device Name
AI4CMR v2.0
Applicant
Ai4medimaging Medical Solutions S.A.
Product Code
QIH · Radiology
Decision Date
Feb 11, 2026
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Special
Regulation
21 CFR 892.2050
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
AI/ML, Software as a Medical Device, Real-World Evidence
Real-World Evidence
Submission
Device
Sponsor
RWD Sources
RWE Use Summary
Key Tags
K252084 · Feb 11, 2026
AI4CMR v2.0
Ai4medimaging Medical Solutions S.A.
Retrospective clinical cardiac MR cases from a tertiary hospital
Retrospective clinical data was used to develop and validate the AI-based vessel segmentation model, ensuring generalizability across real-world patient presentations and scanner configurations.
Retrospective clinical data; Cardiac MR; Model development; Algorithm validation
Clinical Evidence
Study Design
Population
Comparator
Key Endpoints
Retrospective Model Development and Validation Dataset; Retrospective cohort study
61 adult subjects (32% female, 68% male; age range 17–89 years, mean age 62) with various cardiac conditions (cardiomyopathies, aortic disease, valvular disease).; Sample Size: 167 cardiac MR cases (296 vessel samples); Number of Sites: 1 (tertiary Western European hospital)
Not applicable for this study
Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) for vessel segmentation accuracy
AI Performance
Output
Algorithm
Acceptance
Observed
Dev DS
Dev Readers
Test DS
Test Readers
Cardiac vessel segmentation
U-Net convolutional neural network
Dice > 0.70
Dice 0.95
167 cardiac MR cases from 61 adult subjects; Training/Validation/Test sets (70%/15%/15% of subjects).
1 (expert reader)
—
—
Total Forward Volume (TFV)
U-Net convolutional neural network
—
ICC 0.95
167 cardiac MR cases from 61 adult subjects; Training/Validation/Test sets (70%/15%/15% of subjects).
1 (expert reader)
—
—
Total Backward Volume (TBV)
U-Net convolutional neural network
—
ICC 0.82
167 cardiac MR cases from 61 adult subjects; Training/Validation/Test sets (70%/15%/15% of subjects).
1 (expert reader)
—
—
Maximum Velocity (Vmax)
U-Net convolutional neural network
—
ICC 0.95
167 cardiac MR cases from 61 adult subjects; Training/Validation/Test sets (70%/15%/15% of subjects).
1 (expert reader)
—
—
Indications for Use
AI4CMR software is designed to report cardiac function measurements (ventricle volumes, ejection fraction, indices, etc.) from 1.5T and 3T magnetic resonance (MR) scanners. AI4CMR uses artificial intelligence to automatically segment and quantify the different cardiac measurements. Its results are not intended to be used on a stand-alone basis for clinical decision-making. The user incorporating AI4CMR into their DICOM application of choice is responsible for implementing a user interface. AI4CMR also supports clinical diagnostics by calculating flow measurements of vascular structures in 2D phase-encoded cardiac MR images.
Device Story
Cloud-based software plug-in for third-party DICOM viewers; processes 1.5T/3T cardiac MR cine and 2D phase-contrast images. Uses U-Net convolutional neural network to automatically segment cardiac vessels (aorta, pulmonary artery) and chambers. User provides seed point to localize vessels; AI generates contours; clinician reviews and manually edits as needed. Outputs include cardiac function metrics (volumes, ejection fraction, mass) and flow quantification (velocity, volumes, pressure gradients). Used by qualified medical professionals in clinical settings to support diagnostics. Results are not for stand-alone decision-making; intended to assist clinicians in evaluating cardiac function and vascular flow. Benefits include standardized, reproducible quantification of cardiac metrics, reducing manual contouring time.
Indicated for adult patients (18+ years) undergoing cardiac MR imaging (1.5T or 3T) for assessment of cardiac function and vascular flow measurements. Not indicated for pediatric patients or congenital anomalies with extreme vessel distortion.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A medical image management and processing system is a device that provides one or more capabilities relating to the review and digital processing of medical images for the purposes of interpretation by a trained practitioner of disease detection, diagnosis, or patient management. The software components may provide advanced or complex image processing functions for image manipulation, enhancement, or quantification that are intended for use in the interpretation and analysis of medical images. Advanced image manipulation functions may include image segmentation, multimodality image registration, or 3D visualization. Complex quantitative functions may include semi-automated measurements or time-series measurements.
Special Controls
*Classification.* Class II (special controls; voluntary standards—Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) Std., Joint Photographic Experts Group (JPEG) Std., Society of Motion Picture and Television Engineers (SMPTE) Test Pattern).
{0}
FDA U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION
February 11, 2026
Ai4medimaging Medical Solutions S.A.
% Sandra Soniec
Managing Director
Meditec Consulting GmbH
Obermoosstrasse 23
Boll, Berne 3067
Switzerland
Re: K252084
Trade/Device Name: AI4CMR v2.0
Regulation Number: 21 CFR 892.2050
Regulation Name: Medical image management and processing system
Regulatory Class: Class II
Product Code: QIH, LLZ
Dated: January 15, 2026
Received: January 15, 2026
Dear Sandra Soniec:
We have reviewed your section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database available at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
U.S. Food & Drug Administration
10903 New Hampshire Avenue
Silver Spring, MD 20993
www.fda.gov
{1}
K252084 - Sandra Soniec
Page 2
Additional information about changes that may require a new premarket notification are provided in the FDA guidance documents entitled "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99812/download) and "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Software Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99785/download).
Your device is also subject to, among other requirements, the Quality Management System Regulation (QMSR) (21 CFR Part 820), which includes, but is not limited to, ISO 13485 clause 7.3 (Design controls), ISO 13484 clause 8.3 (Nonconforming product), and ISO 13485 clause 8.5 (Corrective and preventative action). Please note that regardless of whether a change requires premarket review, the QMSR requires device manufacturers to review and approve changes to device design and production (ISO 13485 clause 7.3 and 21 CFR 820.70) and document changes and approvals in the device master record (21 CFR 820.181).
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR Part 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reporting-combination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the Quality Management System Regulation (QMSR) (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR Parts 1000-1050.
All medical devices, including Class I and unclassified devices and combination product device constituent parts are required to be in compliance with the final Unique Device Identification System rule ("UDI Rule"). The UDI Rule requires, among other things, that a device bear a unique device identifier (UDI) on its label and package (21 CFR 801.20(a)) unless an exception or alternative applies (21 CFR 801.20(b)) and that the dates on the device label be formatted in accordance with 21 CFR 801.18. The UDI Rule (21 CFR 830.300(a) and 830.320(b)) also requires that certain information be submitted to the Global Unique Device Identification Database (GUDID) (21 CFR Part 830 Subpart E). For additional information on these requirements, please see the UDI System webpage at https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance/unique-device-identification-system-udi-system.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reporting-mdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about medical devices and radiation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-
{2}
K252084 - Sandra Soniec
Page 3
assistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,

Daniel M. Krainak, Ph.D.
Assistant Director
DHT8C: Division of Radiological Imaging
and Radiation Therapy Devices
OHT8: Office of Radiological Health
Office of Product Evaluation and Quality
Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{3}
| Indications for Use | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Please type in the marketing application/submission number, if it is known. This textbox will be left blank for original applications/submissions. | K252084 | ? |
| Please provide the device trade name(s). | | ? |
| AI4CMR v2.0 | | |
| Please provide your Indications for Use below. | | ? |
| AI4CMR software is designed to report cardiac function measurements (ventricle volumes, ejection fraction, indices, etc.) from 1.5T and 3T magnetic resonance (MR) scanners. AI4CMR uses artificial intelligence to automatically segment and quantify the different cardiac measurements. Its results are not intended to be used on a stand-alone basis for clinical decision-making. The user incorporating AI4CMR into their DICOM application of choice is responsible for implementing a user interface.
AI4CMR also supports clinical diagnostics by calculating flow measurements of vascular structures in 2D phase-encoded cardiac MR images. | | |
| Please select the types of uses (select one or both, as applicable). | ☑ Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
☐ Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C) | ? |
AI4CMR
{4}
AI4MedImaging
K252084
# 510(k) Summary
## 1 General Information
| 510(k) Sponsor | AI4MedImaging Medical Solutions S.A. |
| --- | --- |
| Address | Rua do Parque Poente, lt 32
4705-002 Sequeira, Braga Portugal |
| Correspondence Person | Sandra Soniec
Senior consultant
meditec Consulting GmbH, Switzerland |
| Contact Information | Email: soniec@meditec-consulting.ch
Phone: +41 31 535 3193 |
| Date Prepared | February 10, 2026 |
## 2 Subject Device
| Proprietary Name | AI4CMR v2.0 |
| --- | --- |
| Common Name | AI4CMR |
| Classification Name | Automated radiological image processing software |
| Regulation Number | 21 CFR 892.2050 |
| Regulation Name | Medical Image Management and Processing System |
| Product Code | QIH, LLZ |
| Regulatory Class | II |
## 3 Predicate and Reference Device
| Proprietary Name
(Predicate Device) | AI4CMR v1.0 |
| --- | --- |
| Premarket Notification | K220624 |
| Common Name | AI4CMR |
| Classification Name | Automated radiological image processing software |
| Regulation Number | 21 CFR 892.2050 |
| Regulation Name | Medical Image Management and Processing System |
| Product Code | QIH |
| Regulatory Class | II |
| Proprietary Name
(Reference Device) | cvi42 Software Application |
| --- | --- |
| Manufactured by | Circle Cardiovascular Imaging, Inc. |
| Premarket Notification | K242781 |
| Common Name | cvi42 |
| Classification Name | Automated Radiological Image Processing Software |
| Regulation Number | 892.2050 |
| Regulation Name | Medical Image Management and Processing System |
| Product Code | QIH, LLZ |
| Regulatory Class | II |
AI4CMR v2.0 Special 510(k)
{5}
AI4MedImaging
# 4 Device Description
AI4CMR v2.0 is a cloud-based solution designed to integrate to any third-party DICOM viewer application where the DICOM viewer serves as the user interface and the interface to a PACS or scanner for AI4CMR. AI4CMR is implemented as a plug-in to the DICOM viewer by the user and automatically processes and analyses cardiac MR images received by the DICOM viewer to quantify relevant cardiac function metrics as well as analytical flow quantification and makes the information available to the user at the user's discretion.
The following are the cardiac function metrics quantified and reported by the software:
# Quantitative Analysis
The subject device performs the following:
Cardiac function measurements in cine sequences
Anatomy and tissue segmentation
LV/RV stroke volume
LV/RV cardiac output
LV/RV ejection fraction
LV/RV end-diastolic volume
LV/RV end-systolic volume
Analytical flow quantification in 2D Phase-Contrast Sequences (2DFlow)
Total Forward/Backward Net Volumes
- Regurgitation Fraction
- Effective Volume per Minute
Maximum Velocity
Pressure Gradient
- Flow values
# Reporting
The subject device enables the following metrics to be reported as desired by the user:
Cardiac function measurements
LV/RV stroke volume
LV/RV cardiac output
LV/RV ejection fraction
LV/RV end-diastolic volume
LV/RV end-systolic volume
LV myocardial mass
LV/RV end-systolic frame
AI4CMR v2.0 Special 510(k)
{6}
AI4MedImaging
- LV/RV end-diastolic frame
- LV/RV end-systolic volume index
- LV/RV end-diastolic volume index
- LV/RV stroke volume index
- Myocardium mass index
- Cardiac index
## Analytical flow measurements (2DFlow)
- Total Forward Volume
- Total Backward Volume
- Total Volume
- Total Net Positive Volume
- Total Net Negative Volume
- Regurgitation Fraction
- Volume per Minute
- Effective Volume per Minute
- Maximum Pressure Gradient
- Maximum Velocity
- Minimum Velocity
- Maximum Mean Velocity
- Maximum Flow
- Minimum Flow
## 5 Indications for Use
AI4CMR software is designed to report cardiac function measurements (ventricle volumes, ejection fraction, indices, etc.) from 1.5T and 3T magnetic resonance (MR) scanners. AI4CMR uses artificial intelligence to automatically segment and quantify the different cardiac measurements. Its results are not intended to be used on a stand-alone basis for clinical decision-making. The user incorporating AI4CMR into their DICOM application of choice is responsible for implementing a user interface. AI4CMR also supports clinical diagnostics by calculating flow measurements of vascular structures in 2D phase-encoded cardiac MR images.
AI4CMR v2.0 Special 510(k)
{7}
AI4MedImaging
# 6 Comparison of Technological Characteristics
| Feature, Function | Subject device AI4CMR v2.0 | Predicate Device AI4CMR v1.0 (K220624) | Reference Device Circle cvi42 (2D Flow feature) (K242781) | Comparison |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Operating System | cross-platform | cross-platform | cross-platform | Same |
| Platform | client-server | client-server | client-server | Same |
| Scanners | Both 1.5T and 3.0T | Both 1.5T and 3.0T | Both 1.5T and 3.0T | Same |
| Image Input | Supports DICOM 3.0 | Supports DICOM 3.0 | Supports DICOM 3.0 | Same |
| Data Acquisition Protocol for flow and volume analysis | Cardiovascular images: multi-phase, multi-slice acquired from MRI scanners | Cardiovascular images: multi-phase, multi-slice acquired from MRI scanners | Cardiovascular images: multi-phase, multi-slice acquired from MRI scanners | Same |
| Workflows | Basic 2D, Basic 3D, 2D Phase Contrast | Basic 2D, Basic 3D | Basic 2D, Basic 3D, 2D Phase Contrast, additional 2D Flow | Similar |
| Image Display Mode | N/A | N/A | N/A | Same |
| Image Navigation Tools | N/A | N/A | N/A | Same |
| 3D image review | N/A | N/A | N/A | Same |
| Cardiac View | N/A | N/A | N/A | Same |
| Orientation Label | N/A | N/A | N/A | Same |
| Cross-reference indicator | No | No | No | Same |
| View DICOM Data | Yes, users can view the DICOM information about the patient, study and current image via the | Yes, users can view the DICOM information about the patient, study and current image via the | Yes, users can view the DICOM information about the patient, study and current image via the | Same |
AI4CMR v2.0 Special 510(k)
{8}
AI4MedImaging
| Feature, Function | Subject device AI4CMR v2.0 | Predicate Device AI4CMR v1.0 (K220624) | Reference Device Circle cvi42 (2D Flow feature) (K242781) | Comparison |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | third-party viewer | third-party viewer | third-party viewer | |
| Secondary Capture | N/A | N/A | N/A | Same |
| Segmentation of region of interest | Automatic | Automatic | Automatic | Same |
| Phase Error Correction | No | No | No | Same |
| Quantitative Analysis, Flow | Yes, 2D Phase Contrast | No | Similar, comparative Performance Evaluation confirmed equivalence | Similar |
| Quantitative Analysis, Area | No | No | No | Same |
| Quantitative Analysis, Distance | No | No | No | Same |
| Quantitative Analysis, Volume in 4D Flow Workflow | No | No | No | Same |
| Directional/vector display of the blood particle travel | No | No | No | Same |
| Flow quantification of valves | No | No | No | Same |
| Automatic selection of the Temporal Landmark time points | No | No | No | Same |
AI4CMR v2.0 Special 510(k)
{9}
AI4MedImaging
# 7 Model Card
| Model Overview | Model Name: 2D Flow Segmentation Version: 1.0.0 Developer / Manufacturer: AI4CMR Model Category: Convolutional Neural Network (U-Net architecture) Primary Function: Automated segmentation of major cardiac vessels on 2D flow CMR (PC-MRI) images. Regulatory Classification: Class II, System, Image Processing, Radiological Short Description: The model uses a U-Net convolutional neural network to generate pixel-wise segmentation masks of cardiac vessels (aorta, pulmonary artery) on phase-contrast MRI images. The segmentation supports calculation of flow and velocity profiles and quantification. |
| --- | --- |
| Intended Users | AI4CMR shall be used by qualified medical professionals, experienced in examining and evaluating magnetic resonance images as a support tool that provides relevant clinical information. The software is not intended to determine or recommend a course of action or treatment for a patient. |
| Indications for Use | AI4CMR supports clinical diagnostics by calculating flow measurements of vascular structures in 2D phase-encoded cardiac MR images. Its results are not intended to be used on a stand-alone basis for clinical decision-making. |
| Model Summary | AI4CMR uses a convolutional neural network-based segmentation model to outline vascular structures on magnitude and phase images. A user-selected seed point localizes the vessel, and generated contours may be manually edited by the clinician. The model is “locked,” meaning it does not adapt or change with new input data. |
| AI-based 2D Flow Segmentation – Model Development | The AI-based vessel segmentation model was developed using retrospective clinical data comprising 167 cardiac MR cases from 61 adult subjects (32% female, 68% male; age range 17–89 years, mean age 62), obtained from a tertiary Western European hospital. Images were acquired using standard cardiac MR 2D phase-contrast flow imaging protocols on 1.5T and 3T scanners. The dataset included both normal and pathological cases (e.g., cardiomyopathies, aortic disease, and valvular disease) and preserved real-world variability in anatomy, motion artifacts, and image quality, with no exclusions based solely on image quality. An expert reader (EACVI level III) independently annotated all cases using standard segmentation guidelines to ensure consistency and algorithm generalizability, with intra-reader reliability maintained by following established standards. |
AI4CMR v2.0 Special 510(k)
{10}
AI4MedImaging
| | In total, 296 vessel samples (ascending aorta, descending aorta, and pulmonary artery) were included. Data were stratified by vessel type and split at the subject level into training, validation, and independent test sets (70%/15%/15% of subjects), with all vessels and repeated acquisitions from each subject assigned exclusively to a single dataset to prevent data leakage. Segmentation performance was evaluated using the Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC), with values greater than 0.70 defined a priori as the acceptance criterion based on established evidence of clinically usable vessel delineation. On the independent test set, the model achieved DSC values of 0.952 for the ascending aorta, 0.957 for the descending aorta, and 0.952 for the pulmonary artery, exceeding the predefined acceptance threshold. Model generalizability was further supported through multi-vendor evaluation across Siemens, GE, and Philips MRI systems and comparison with a legally marketed reference device. |
| --- | --- |
| Performance Summary | Performance was evaluated using internally validated datasets and independent multi-center data. Segmentation Performance: • Dice: 0.95 • Precision: 0.96 • Recall: 0.95 Agreement With Predicate/Reference Measurements: (In multi-vendor, multi-center evaluation) • Total Forward Volume (TFV): ICC 0.95 • Total Backward Volume (TBV): ICC 0.82 • Maximum Velocity (Vmax): ICC 0.95 |
| Generalizability | The model was evaluated on images from multiple centers and major MRI vendors, covering a broad range of adult patient presentations. Validation included diverse flow encoding settings and scanner configurations. |
| Limitations | • Not validated on pediatric patients under 18 years • Not designed for 4D flow MRI • Not validated on congenital anomalies with extreme vessel distortion • Performance may decrease on images with very low signal-to-noise ratio or poor contrast. |
| Warnings & Precautions | • The segmentation results must be reviewed and, if necessary, corrected by a qualified clinician. • Segmentation inaccuracies may lead to incorrect flow quantification. • Not intended to provide a diagnosis or replace expert clinical judgment. |
AI4CMR v2.0 Special 510(k)
{11}
AI4CMR v2.0 Special 510(k)
Page 8 of 9
| User Interaction | - The user provides a seed point to identify the target vessel.
- Segmentation contours are displayed on magnitude and phase images.
- Manual editing tools allow correction or refinement of the AI-generated contours. |
| --- | --- |
| Version History | Version 1.0, Initial Release |
{12}
AI4MedImaging
# 8 Performance Data
Safety and performance of AI4CMR v2.0 were evaluated and verified in accordance with software design specifications and applicable performance standards through software verification and validation activities. Software validation was performed in accordance with IEC 62304:2006+A1:2015 and applicable FDA guidance, including Guidance for the Content of Premarket Submissions for Software Contained in Medical Devices.
Non-clinical verification and validation demonstrated that the device meets its design requirements and intended use and is as safe and effective as the predicate device, with risks managed through a formal risk management process. Performance evaluation comparing AI4CMR v2.0 with the legally marketed reference device cvi42 (K242781), using both synthetic and real-world phase-contrast CMR datasets, demonstrated consistent agreement across vendors for three primary flow measurements—total forward volume (TFV), total backward volume (TBV), and maximum velocity (Vmax)—with intraclass correlation coefficients of 0.95, 0.82, and 0.95, respectively.
The additional 2D Flow outputs are not independent measurements but are deterministic mathematical derivatives of these validated core metrics. Technical validation of the AI-based vessel segmentation demonstrated robustness against manual reference annotations (mean Dice Similarity Coefficient of 0.857), supporting accurate and reproducible flow quantification under realistic clinical variability.
Clinical validation was not required for this modification, as the feature provides deterministic quantitative measurements without diagnostic interpretation. Safety and effectiveness are adequately supported through non-clinical performance testing, multi-vendor evaluation, and agreement with the legally marketed reference device. These results adequately support a determination of substantial equivalence in accordance with 21 CFR 807.100(b)(2)(ii)(B).
# 9 Conclusion
Based on the information submitted in this premarket notification, and based on the indications for use, technological characteristics and performance testing, the AI4CMR v2.0 raises no new questions of safety and effectiveness and is substantially equivalent to the predicate device in terms of safety, efficacy, and performance.
AI4CMR v2.0 Special 510(k)
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.