The xvision Spine System, with xvision Spine System Software, is intended as an aid for precisely locating anatomical structures in either open or percutaneous spine procedures. Their use is indicated for any medical condition in which the use of stereotactic surgery may be appropriate, and where reference to a rigid anatomical structure, such as the spine or pelvis, can be identified relative to a patient’s fluoroscopic or CT imagery of the anatomy. This can include the following spinal procedures: - Posterior Pedicle Screw Placement in the thoracic and sacro-lumbar region. - Posterior Screw Placement in C3-C7 vertebrae - Iliosacral Screw Placement - Angular procedures requiring access to the disc space - Lateral trajectories required to access the Sacro-Iliac joint The Headset of the xvision Spine System displays 2D stereotaxic screens and a virtual anatomy screen. The stereotaxic screen is indicated for correlating the tracked instrument location to the registered patient imagery. The virtual screen is indicated for displaying the virtual instrument location in relation to the virtual anatomy to assist in percutaneous visualization and trajectory planning. The virtual display should not be relied upon solely for absolute positional information and should always be used in conjunction with the displayed stereotaxic information.
Device Story
Image-guided navigation system for open/percutaneous spinal surgery; assists surgeons in pedicle screw placement. Inputs: patient fluoroscopic/CT imagery; real-time wireless optical tracking data. Processing: system registers patient anatomy to imagery; tracks surgical instruments; projects 2D/3D navigation data onto surgeon's retina via transparent near-eye-display headset. Output: real-time visualization of instrument position relative to virtual anatomy. Used in OR by surgeons; allows simultaneous view of patient and navigation data. Benefits: improved visualization, ergonomic trajectory planning, and surgical accuracy. Gen 2 headset adds higher resolution, larger field of view, and improved headlamp intensity.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing included software V&V (IEC 62304), electrical safety (ANSI/AAMI ES60601-1), EMC (IEC 60601-1-2), and headset reliability. Positional accuracy validated per ASTM 2554. Cadaver study evaluated clinical accuracy using Gertzbein-Robbins scores and calculated positional/trajectory errors for both headset configurations. Formative human factors assessment conducted via surgeon questionnaires on ergonomics and visual performance.
Indicated for patients requiring stereotactic surgery for spinal or pelvic procedures where rigid anatomical structures can be referenced to fluoroscopic or CT imagery. Includes posterior pedicle screw placement (thoracic/sacro-lumbar), posterior screw placement (C3-C7), iliosacral screw placement, and angular/lateral procedures for disc space or sacro-iliac joint access.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A stereotaxic instrument is a device consisting of a rigid frame with a calibrated guide mechanism for precisely positioning probes or other devices within a patient's brain, spinal cord, or other part of the nervous system.
{0}
FDA U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION
October 3, 2025
Augmedics Ltd.
% Janice Hogan
Partner
Hogan Lovells US LLP
1735 Market Street, Floor 23
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103
Re: K251639
Trade/Device Name: xvision Spine system
Regulation Number: 21 CFR 882.4560
Regulation Name: Stereotaxic Instrument
Regulatory Class: Class II
Product Code: SBF
Dated: May 29, 2025
Received: September 4, 2025
Dear Janice Hogan:
We have reviewed your section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database available at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Additional information about changes that may require a new premarket notification are provided in the FDA guidance documents entitled "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Change to an Existing Device"
U.S. Food & Drug Administration
10903 New Hampshire Avenue
Silver Spring, MD 20993
www.fda.gov
{1}
K251639 - Janice Hogan
Page 2
(https://www.fda.gov/media/99812/download) and "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Software Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99785/download).
Your device is also subject to, among other requirements, the Quality System (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820), which includes, but is not limited to, 21 CFR 820.30, Design controls; 21 CFR 820.90, Nonconforming product; and 21 CFR 820.100, Corrective and preventive action. Please note that regardless of whether a change requires premarket review, the QS regulation requires device manufacturers to review and approve changes to device design and production (21 CFR 820.30 and 21 CFR 820.70) and document changes and approvals in the device master record (21 CFR 820.181).
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR Part 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reporting-combination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR Parts 1000-1050.
All medical devices, including Class I and unclassified devices and combination product device constituent parts are required to be in compliance with the final Unique Device Identification System rule ("UDI Rule"). The UDI Rule requires, among other things, that a device bear a unique device identifier (UDI) on its label and package (21 CFR 801.20(a)) unless an exception or alternative applies (21 CFR 801.20(b)) and that the dates on the device label be formatted in accordance with 21 CFR 801.18. The UDI Rule (21 CFR 830.300(a) and 830.320(b)) also requires that certain information be submitted to the Global Unique Device Identification Database (GUDID) (21 CFR Part 830 Subpart E). For additional information on these requirements, please see the UDI System webpage at https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance/unique-device-identification-system-udi-system.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reporting-mdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about medical devices and radiation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE
{2}
K251639 - Janice Hogan
Page 3
by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
Shumaya Ali -S
Shumaya Ali, M.P.H.
Assistant Director
DHT6C: Division of Restorative,
Repair, and Trauma Devices
OHT6: Office of Orthopedic Devices
Office of Product Evaluation and Quality
Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{3}
xvision Spine system
Page 1 of 1.
| Indications for Use | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Please type in the marketing application/submission number, if it is known. This
textbox will be left blank for original applications/submissions. | K251639 | ? |
| Please provide the device trade name(s). | | ? |
| xvision Spine system | | |
| Please provide your Indications for Use below. | | ? |
| The xvision Spine System, with xvision Spine System Software, is intended as an aid for precisely locating
anatomical structures in either open or percutaneous spine procedures.
Their use is indicated for any medical condition in which the use of stereotactic surgery may be appropriate,
and where reference to a rigid anatomical structure, such as the spine or pelvis, can be identified relative to
a patient’s fluoroscopic or CT imagery of the anatomy. This can include the following spinal procedures:
- Posterior Pedicle Screw Placement in the thoracic and sacro-lumbar region.
- Posterior Screw Placement in C3-C7 vertebrae
- Iliosacral Screw Placement
- Angular procedures requiring access to the disc space
- Lateral trajectories required to access the Sacro-Iliac joint
The Headset of the xvision Spine System displays 2D stereotaxic screens and a virtual anatomy screen.
The stereotaxic screen is indicated for correlating the tracked instrument location to the registered patient
imagery. The virtual screen is indicated for displaying the virtual instrument location in relation to the virtual
anatomy to assist in percutaneous visualization and trajectory planning.
The virtual display should not be relied upon solely for absolute positional information and should always be
used in conjunction with the displayed stereotaxic information. | | |
| Please select the types of uses (select one or both, as
applicable). | ☑ Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
☐ Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C) | ? |
{4}
510(k) Summary - K251639
Augmedics' xvision Spine system
SUBMITTER
Augmedics LTD.
2 Ha-Otsma St.
Yokneam Illit, 2069205, Israel
Phone: +972-4-3730111
Contact person: Tami Harel
Date prepared: May 29, 2025
Name of device: xvision Spine System
Common or Usual Name XVS
Classification Name: Orthopedic Augmented Reality (21 CFR 882.4560)
Regulatory Class: Class II
Product Code: SBF
Predicate Device: xvision Spine System, manufactured by Augmedics Ltd. Israel (K250255)
INTENDED USE / INDICATIONS FOR USE
The xvision Spine system, with xvision Spine system software, is intended as an aid for precisely locating anatomical structures in either open or percutaneous spine procedures.
Their use is indicated for any medical condition in which the use of stereotactic surgery may be appropriate, and where reference to a rigid anatomical structure, such as the spine or pelvis, can be identified relative to a patient's fluoroscopic or CT imagery of the anatomy. This can include the following spinal procedures:
- Posterior Pedicle Screw Placement in the thoracic and sacro-lumbar region.
- Posterior Screw Placement in C3-C7 vertebrae
- Iliosacral Screw Placement
- Angular procedures requiring access to the disc space
- Lateral trajectories required to access the Sacro-Iliac joint
The Headset of the xvision Spine System displays 2D stereotaxic screens and a virtual anatomy screen. The stereotaxic screen is indicated for correlating the tracked instrument location to the registered patient imagery. The virtual screen is indicated for displaying the virtual instrument location in relation to the virtual anatomy to assist in percutaneous visualization and trajectory planning.
Page 1 of 4.
{5}
The virtual display should not be relied upon solely for absolute positional information and should always be used in conjunction with the displayed stereotaxic information.
## DEVICE DESCRIPTION SUMMARY
The xvision Spine (XVS) system is an image-guided navigation system that is designed to assist surgeons in placing pedicle screws accurately, during open or percutaneous computer-assisted spinal surgery. The system consists of dedicated software, headset, single use passive reflective markers and reusable components. It uses wireless optical tracking technology and displays to the surgeon the location of the tracked surgical instruments relative to the acquired patient's scan, onto the surgical field. The 2D scanned data and 3D reconstructed model, along with tracking information, are projected to the surgeons' retina using a transparent near-eye-display Headset, allowing the surgeon to both look at the patient and the navigation data at the same time.
The purpose of this 510(k) submission is to add an alternative headset configuration (Gen 2) to the cleared Gen 1 configuration. The XVS software is updated to enable integration of the Gen 2 headset, along with minor enhancements to the tracking algorithm and bug fixes.
## INDICATION FOR USE COMPARISON
The intended use and the indications for use of the modified XVS are identical to the cleared predicate device.
## TECHNOLOGICAL COMPARISON
The modified xvision Spine System is similar in its technological features to its predicate device, the cleared xvision Spine System. Both the cleared and the modified devices use wireless optical tracking technology, and display to the surgeon the location of the tracked surgical instruments relative to the acquired patient's scan, onto the surgical field. The 2D scanned data and 3D reconstructed model, along with tracking information, are projected to the surgeon's retina using a transparent near-eye-display headset, allowing the surgeon to simultaneously visualize the patient and the navigation data in real time.
The modified XVS system supports an alternative headset configuration (Gen 2), with minor software enhancements to the tracking algorithm. The new headset configuration, with the updated software, incorporates ergonomic and visualization improvements while maintaining the same intended functions and fundamental technological principles as the cleared device. Both headsets are battery operated and are comprised of similar components: transparent near-eye display, monochromatic camera with infrared (IR) filter, electronics to support headset functionality and a headlamp. Improved display visualization and ergonomics of Gen 2 configuration include larger display field of view, higher display resolution, lighter weight, improved ergonomics and improved headlamp illumination intensity for better visibility.
The principles of operation of the modified XVS and the cleared device are the same. The design modifications that were introduced to the hardware components and software features are minor enhancements that do not change the system's principles of operations or the way the user interacts with the system.
K251639, Page 2 of 4.
{6}
# PERFORMANCE DATA
The following tests were conducted to evaluate the device:
- Software verification and validation testing was conducted as required by IEC 62304 and FDA guidance on general principles of software validation, January 11, 2002
- The performance of the Gen2 headset display was demonstrated by verifying the following elements: field of view, resolution, transmission, contrast ratio, distortion, grey level display, luminance stability over use time, latency, and accurate alignment of the virtual 3D model with reality.
- Electrical safety was tested in accordance with ANSI/AAMI ES60601-1:2005/(R)2012 & A1:2012, C1:2009/(R)2012 & A2:2010/(R)2012 (Cons. Text) [Incl. AMD2:2021] - Medical electrical equipment - Part 1: General requirements for basic safety and essential performance.
- Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC) was tested in accordance with IEC 60601-1-2 Edition 4.1 2020-09 (consolidated version) - Medical electrical equipment - Part 1-2: General requirements for basic safety and essential performance - Collateral Standard: Electromagnetic disturbances - Requirements and tests.
- Headset Gen 2 was demonstrated to be compliant with the RF radiation exposure limits of the FCC Part 15 requirements.
- Shipping validation on Gen 2 headset was performed according to ASTM D4169 standard
- Cleaning and disinfection evaluation was performed on Gen 2 headset according to ISO 17664-1:2021, AAMI TIR 12:2020/(R):2023 and ANSI/AAMI ST98:2022
- The reliability of new mechanisms of headset Gen2 were verified.
- Gen2 headlamp was verified to comply with its specifications
- Positional accuracy was tested according to ASTM 2554
- Registration and overall accuracy were tested using phantoms, under different scenarios simulating clinical conditions. Tests were performed using both headsets' configurations.
- The system's accuracy was validated in a cadaver study, using both headsets' configurations. Screws were positioned in different vertebrae levels using IntraOp and 2D-3D registration methods. The positional and trajectory errors were calculated as the difference between the actual and virtual screw tip position, and the difference between the screw orientation and its recorded virtual trajectory. Additionally, clinical accuracy was evaluated using the Gertzbein-Robbins score by viewing the post-op scans
- A formative human factors assessment was performed as part of the cadaver study. Each surgeon completed full clinical flow of using the XVS system while using both headsets' configurations. After completing the screw placement procedure, the participants were asked
K251639, Page 3 of 4.
{7}
to fill out a questionnaire regarding the use of the two headsets' configurations related to the ergonomics and visual performance.
All performance testing demonstrates that the xvision Spine System performs according to specifications and functions as intended.
# CONCLUSIONS
The modified XVS system and the cleared XVS system have the same intended use and indications for use, similar technological characteristics, and the same principles of operation. The minor design changes introduced in the proposed system, including the addition of an alternative headset configuration and related software updates, are intended to enhance surgeon ergonomics, optical personalization, and tracking robustness. These modifications do not present new or different questions of safety or effectiveness compared to the predicate device. Performance data (bench and cadaver), demonstrate that the modified system meets the same acceptance criteria as the cleared system and that the accuracy as well as visual performance of the modified XVS system remain comparable to that of the predicate device.
Thus, the modified XVS system is substantially equivalent to its predicate device, the cleared XVS system (K250255).
K251639, Page 4 of 4.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.