The Multilayered Zirconia Disc is indicated for fabrication of anterior and posterior dental restorations using different CAD/CAM or manual machines. All discs are processed through dental laboratories or by dental professionals.
Device Story
DenMat Multilayered Zirconia Disc is a yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia (Y-TZP) ceramic blank; used by dental laboratories or professionals to fabricate permanent/removable dental prosthetics (anterior/posterior restorations). The disc is milled using CAD/CAM or manual machines; requires sintering to achieve final material properties. The device serves as a raw material for custom dental restorations; clinical benefit includes providing durable, biocompatible, monolithic ceramic prostheses. Healthcare providers use the finished restoration to restore tooth structure, function, and aesthetics.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. Performance testing demonstrated compliance with ISO 6872:2024 and ISO 13356:2015. Key metrics: Biaxial flexural strength (568.72-740.45 MPa), fracture toughness (4.14-4.21 MPa√m), sintered density (6.05-6.11 g/cm³), and chemical solubility (<100 μg/cm²). Biocompatibility evaluated per ISO 10993-1 and ISO 7405.
Technological Characteristics
Material: Yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia (Y-TZP ZrO2). Standards: ISO 6872:2024 (Type II, Class 5), ISO 13356:2015, ISO 10993-1:2018, ASTM E831, ASTM C1421. Form factor: Circular discs (98.5mm diameter; 14-25mm thickness). Processing: CAD/CAM or manual milling followed by sintering. Connectivity: None (standalone material).
Indications for Use
Indicated for fabrication of anterior and posterior dental restorations in patients requiring dental prosthetics. Processed by dental laboratories or professionals.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
Porcelain powder for clinical use is a device consisting of a mixture of kaolin, felspar, quartz, or other substances intended for use in the production of artificial teeth in fixed or removable dentures, of jacket crowns, facings, and veneers. The device is used in prosthetic dentistry by heating the powder mixture to a high temperature in an oven to produce a hard prosthesis with a glass-like finish.
{0}
FDA U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION
August 25, 2025
DenMat Holding, LLC
Kimberly Maynes
Sr. Supervisor, Regulatory Affairs
1017 W. Central Avenue
Lompoc, California 93436
Re: K251593
Trade/Device Name: DenMat Multilayered Zirconia Disc
Regulation Number: 21 CFR 872.6660
Regulation Name: Porcelain Powder For Clinical Use
Regulatory Class: Class II
Product Code: EIH
Dated: May 23, 2025
Received: May 27, 2025
Dear Kimberly Maynes:
We have reviewed your section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database available at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
U.S. Food & Drug Administration
10903 New Hampshire Avenue
Silver Spring, MD 20993
www.fda.gov
{1}
K251593 - Kimberly Maynes
Page 2
Additional information about changes that may require a new premarket notification are provided in the FDA guidance documents entitled "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99812/download) and "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Software Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99785/download).
Your device is also subject to, among other requirements, the Quality System (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820), which includes, but is not limited to, 21 CFR 820.30, Design controls; 21 CFR 820.90, Nonconforming product; and 21 CFR 820.100, Corrective and preventive action. Please note that regardless of whether a change requires premarket review, the QS regulation requires device manufacturers to review and approve changes to device design and production (21 CFR 820.30 and 21 CFR 820.70) and document changes and approvals in the device master record (21 CFR 820.181).
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR Part 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reporting-combination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR Parts 1000-1050.
All medical devices, including Class I and unclassified devices and combination product device constituent parts are required to be in compliance with the final Unique Device Identification System rule ("UDI Rule"). The UDI Rule requires, among other things, that a device bear a unique device identifier (UDI) on its label and package (21 CFR 801.20(a)) unless an exception or alternative applies (21 CFR 801.20(b)) and that the dates on the device label be formatted in accordance with 21 CFR 801.18. The UDI Rule (21 CFR 830.300(a) and 830.320(b)) also requires that certain information be submitted to the Global Unique Device Identification Database (GUDID) (21 CFR Part 830 Subpart E). For additional information on these requirements, please see the UDI System webpage at https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance/unique-device-identification-system-udi-system.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reporting-mdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about medical devices and radiation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-
{2}
K251593 - Kimberly Maynes
Page 3
assistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
MICHAEL E. ADJODHA -S
Michael E. Adjodha, MChE, RAC, CQIA
Assistant Director
DHT1B: Division of Dental and ENT Devices
OHT1: Office of Ophthalmic, Anesthesia, Respiratory, ENT, and Dental Devices
Office of Product Evaluation and Quality
Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{3}
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
Indications for Use
Form Approved: OMB No. 0910-0120
Expiration Date: 07/31/2026
See PRA Statement below.
Submission Number (if known)
K251593
Device Name
DenMat Multilayered Zirconia Disc
Indications for Use (Describe)
The Multilayered Zirconia Disc is indicated for fabrication of anterior and posterior dental restorations using different CAD/CAM or manual machines.
All discs are processed through dental laboratories or by dental professionals.
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
☑ Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
☐ Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
# CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
*DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
Department of Health and Human Services
Food and Drug Administration
Office of Chief Information Officer
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff
PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{4}
dm
DenMat
# 510(k) Summary - K251593
This 510(k) Summary is submitted in accordance with the requirements of 21 CFR 807.92.
| Submitter Information | | 21 CFR 807.92(a)(1) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Submitter: | Den-Mat Holdings, LLC
1017 W. Central Ave.
Lompoc, CA, 93436, USA
Phone: 805-346-3700
Establishment Registration Number: 2018957 | |
| Contact Person: | Kim Maynes
Sr. Supervisor, Regulatory Affairs
Phone: 805-346-3700
Email: regulatory@denmat.com | |
| Date Prepared: | August 25, 2025 | |
| Device Information | | 21 CFR 807.92(a)(2) |
| Trade Name: | DenMat Multilayered Zirconia Disc | |
| Common Name: | Powder, Porcelain | |
| Regulation Number: | 21 CFR 872.6660 | |
| Regulation Name: | Porcelain powder for clinical use | |
| Classification: | Class II | |
| Product Code: | EIH | |
| Review Panel: | Dental | |
| Legally Marketed Predicate Device(s) | | 21 CFR 807.92(a)(3) |
| Device Trade Name: | Gradual Dental Zirconia Blank | |
| 510(k) Number: | K231687 | |
| Product Code: | EIH | |
| Device Description | | 21 CFR 807.92(a)(4) |
DenMat Multilayered Zirconia Discs are made of Zirconium Oxide (Y-TZP ZrO2). For dental applications in accordance with ISO 6872, (DIN EN ISO 6872), this material is specially made for manufacturing of permanent and removable dental prosthetics. After completion of the final sintering, all DenMat Multilayered Zirconia meets the requirements of ISO 6872, Type II, Class 5. It is necessary to mill the disc with an appropriate enlargement factor to account for the shrinkage that occurs during full sintering. DenMat Zirconia Multilayered (ML) discs can be used with any compatible CAD/CAM machine.
# Material Used:
DenMat Multilayered Zirconia Discs are composed of zirconia ceramics (ZrO2) based on yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia (Y-TZP). The material is biocompatible according to ISO 10993-1: 2018 “Biological Evaluation of medical devices – Part 1: Evaluation and testing within a risk management process”
1017 W. Central Avenue, Lompoc, CA 93436
www.denmat.com
P: 805-346-3700
F: 805-347-7933
{5}
dn DenMat
Intended Use / Indications for Use
21 CFR 807.92(a)(5)
The Multilayered Zirconia Disc is indicated for fabrication of anterior and posterior dental restorations using different CAD/CAM or manual machines. All discs are processed through dental laboratories or by dental professionals.
Comparison of Technological Characteristics
21 CFR 807.92(a)(6)
DenMat Multilayered Zirconia Disc comparison to the predicate device, UPCERA Gradual Dental Zirconia Blank (K231687), is based upon similar characteristics such as intended use, indications, contra-indications, material properties, chemical composition, processing/fabrication and testing to recognized standards and guidelines. DenMat Multilayered Zirconia Disc utilizes a substantially equivalent composition (ZrO2+HfO2+Y2O3: > 99), which results in a flexural strength of >800MPa and a fracture toughness of >5.0 MPa √ m, therefore allowing for a classification of Class 5 in the ISO 6872:2024 standard. Thus, the product meets the standards for "Monolithic-ceramic for prostheses involving four or more units or fully covered substructure for prostheses involving four or more units."
The predicate device's Indications for Use provide for "the production of full contour and substructure restorations up to a full arch" and the subject device also meets the standards for this same indication based upon the specification with ISO 6872:2024, Section 4 and Annex A.
Additionally, while Indication for Use statements now note prescription requirements on the form, we have still indicated the device is for use by dental technicians. We have also noted the prescription requirements in the Instructions for Use and on the device labeling. Both the subject device and predicate device are provided in disc shapes of various sizes. The subject and predicate device have similar physical/mechanical properties that meet the requirements of ISO 6872:2024.
DenMat Multilayered Zirconia Disc biocompatibility was addressed using FDA's Biocompatibility Guidance "Use of International Standard ISO 10993-1, "Biological evaluation of medical devices - Part 1: Evaluation and testing within a risk management process" and ISO 7405 Dentistry — Evaluation of biocompatibility of medical devices used in dentistry.
Zirconia Multilayered Zirconia Disc dental porcelain zirconium oxide blanks for use by dental professionals to construct custom dental restorations are substantially similar to the UPCERA (K231687) in general composition, safety and effectiveness.
Subject and Predicate comparison table below.
{6}
Page 3 of 6
dn
DenMat
Device(s) Similarities
| | DenMat Zirconia Multilayered Disc (K251593) | UPCERA Gradual Dental Zirconia Blank (K231687) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Indications for use | The Multilayered Zirconia Disc is indicated for fabrication of anterior and posterior dental restorations using different CAD/CAM or manual machines. All discs are processed through dental laboratories or by dental professionals. | The device is indicated for fabrication of anterior and posterior dental restorations using different CAD/CAM or manual machines. All blanks are processed through dental laboratories or by dental professionals. |
| Contra- Indications* | DenMat Multilayered Zirconia Disc blanks are milled, the dental technician should take appropriate safety methods such as face mask and eye protection when removing the finished dental prostheses from the holder to preclude inhaling dust particles upon removal with power tools. • Insufficient tooth structure reduction. • Insufficient tooth structure for proper adhesion and force distribution. • Insufficient oral hygiene. • Insufficient interproximal space for sufficient joints in bridges. • Known allergies. • Known incompatibilities to product composition. • Heavy discoloration of prepped tooth structure. | There are no specific precautions, warnings or contra- indications that are required for the safe and effective use of the device by the dental professional or patient. |
| Technical Data (performance testing included) | | |
{7}
Page 4 of 6

| Material Composition % wt. | ZrO2 | | 91.958-92.570% | | Zirconia (ZrO2+HfO2+Y2O3: ≥ 98%) Inorganic pigments |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | Y2O3 | | 7.250-7.800% | | |
| | SiO2 | | ≤0.010% | | |
| | Fe2O3 | | 0.017-0.114% | | |
| | CaO | | ≤0.007% | | |
| | Na2O | | ≤0.004% | | |
| | Mn2O3 | | ≤0.003% | | |
| | Er2O3 | | ≤0.263% | | |
| | | | | | |
| Radioactivity(Freedom from extraneous materials per ISO 6872:2024 Section 5.2 active conc. of not more than 1.0 Bq g-1 of Uranium238) | < 0.0174 Bq·g-1of 238U | | | | Not supplied |
| Blank sizes (mm) | Disc | Diameter (mm) | Thickness (mm) | | Not supplied |
| | 1 | 98.5 | 14 | | |
| | 2 | 98.5 | 18 | | |
| | 3 | 98.5 | 22 | | |
| | 4 | 98.5 | 25 | | |
| | | | | | |
| Sintered Density g cm-3 ISO 13356: 2015 Section 4.1 Req't. of ≥ 6.0 | 6.04 ± 0.03 g/cm3 | | | | Not supplied |
| Coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE) ISO 6872: 2024, No req't. | 10.39 ± 0.34 (x10-6K-1) | | | | Not supplied |
| Fracture toughness KIC ISO 6872:2024 Annex A; minimum for class 5, 4.0 MPa m1/2 | 4.90 ± 0.94 MPa√m | | | | Not supplied |
{8}
Page 5 of 6
dn
DenMat
| Average Flexural strength per ISO 6872: 2024, Limit >800MPa | 1085.51 ± 265.06 MPa | Not supplied |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Chemical solubility per ISO 6872:2024 Limit 100 μg/cm2 | < 100 μg/cm2 | Not supplied |
| Biocompatibility per ISO 10993-1: Part 1 - ‘Biological evaluation of medical devices – Part 1: Evaluation and testing within a risk management process.’ | Biocompatibility was addressed using FDA' Biocompatibility Guidance "Use of International Standard ISO 10993-1, "Biological evaluation of medical devices - Part 1: Evaluation and testing within a risk management process" and ISO 7405 Dentistry — Evaluation of biocompatibility of medical devices used in dentistry. | Tested for Cytotoxicity, Irritation Oral Mucosa, Irritation, Sensitization, Subacute and subchronic toxicity and genotoxicity on shaded material, no adverse reactions identified. |
| Safety and Efficacy of the Device | The device functions in a similar manner to other comparative devices and the intended use is the same. The differences between comparatives devices are minor and do not raise new safety concerns. The effectiveness and suitability of the device for the intended purpose is assured through wide, general use of similar other predicate devices that demonstrate the safe use of the device to construct dental restorations. | Not supplied |
Performance Data
21 CFR 807.92(b)
Physical Properties:
Tabulated chart of finished product DenMat Multilayered Zirconia Disc below:
Summary of The Performance Testing Report:
Single Crown
| Test Performed | Test Results | Acceptance Criteria | Applied Standard | Results |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Biaxial Flexural strength | 568.72 ± 168.22 MPa | >100 MPa | ISO 6872: 2024 | Pass |
| Coefficient of Thermal Expansion | 10.40 ± 0.02 (x10-6K-1) | 10.40 ± 0.34 (x10-6K-1) | ISO 6872: 2024 ASTM E831 | Pass |
| Chemical solubility | < 100 μg/cm2 | < 100 μg/cm2 | ISO 6872: 2024 | Pass |
| Fracture toughness | 4.14 ± 0.43 MPa√m | >1.0 MPa√m | ISO 6872: 2024 (ISO 18756/ASTM C1421) | Pass |
| Sintered Density | 6.11 ± 0.05 g/cm3 | ≥6.0 | ISO 13356: 2015 | Pass |
{9}
Page 6 of 6
dn
DenMat
Single Crown Units & 3 Unit Bridges
| Test Performed | Test Results | Acceptance Criteria | Applied Standard | Results |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Biaxial Flexural strength | 740.45 ± 252.32 MPa | > 500 MPa | ISO 6872: 2024 | Pass |
| Coefficient of Thermal Expansion | 10.43 ± 0.05 (x10⁻⁶ K⁻¹) | 10.40 ± 0.34 (x10⁻⁶ K⁻¹) | ISO 6872: 2024
ASTM E831 | Pass |
| Chemical solubility | < 100 μg/cm² | < 100 μg/cm² | ISO 6872: 2024 | Pass |
| Fracture toughness | 4.21 ± 0.48 MPaVm | > 3.5 MPaVm | ISO 6872: 2024 (ISO 18756/ASTM C1421) | Pass |
| Sintered Density | 6.05 ± 0.03 g/cm³ | ≥ 6.0 | ISO 13356: 2015 | Pass |
## Conclusion
Based on the indications for use, technological characteristics, and the summary of data submitted, Den-Mat Holdings, LLC has determined that the subject device does not raise different questions of safety and effectiveness compared to the predicate devices. Therefore, the proposed subject device is substantially equivalent to the legally marketed predicate devices.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.