K251091 · Truvian Health · CHH · Dec 30, 2025 · Clinical Chemistry
Device Facts
Record ID
K251091
Device Name
Lipids
Applicant
Truvian Health
Product Code
CHH · Clinical Chemistry
Decision Date
Dec 30, 2025
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 862.1175
Device Class
Class 1
Indications for Use
Lipids is part of the TruWellness Panel™ and is intended for use on the TruVerus™. Lipids (part of the TruWellness Panel™) is an in vitro diagnostic device and intended to be used for the quantitative determination of Total Cholesterol (TChol) and Triglycerides (TRIG) in lithium-heparinized venous whole blood in clinical laboratory or point-of-care settings. From the TRIG determination, Very Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (VLDL) is calculated by the analyzer. Lipids (part of the TruWellness Panel™) is an in vitro diagnostic test system that aids the physician in the diagnosis and treatment of the following disorders in adults 18 years of age or older: Total Cholesterol (TChol): Excess cholesterol in the blood and lipid and lipoprotein disorders. Triglyceride (TRIG): Diabetes mellitus, nephrosis, liver obstruction, and other diseases involving lipid metabolism; various endocrine disorders.
Device Story
TruVerus™ benchtop analyzer uses Single-Use Consumable Kit (TruWellness Panel™) to process lithium-heparinized venous whole blood. System automates sample handling via high-precision pipettor, onboard centrifugation, and motion control. Detection modules use photometric/colorimetric analysis (TChol 510nm, TRIG 540nm) with xenon-arc stroboscopic lamp and CMOS array detector. Instrument performs self-tests and QC checks using optical/electronic feedback. Results displayed on touchscreen for clinician review; VLDL calculated from TRIG. Used in clinical labs or point-of-care settings to aid diagnosis of lipid metabolism disorders. Benefits include rapid, integrated testing without specialized skills or external calibration.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. Precision/reproducibility (CLSI EP05-A3) across 3 sites/3 instruments showed total CV% 1.1-3.0%. Linearity (EP06-Ed2) confirmed 20-520 mg/dL (TChol) and 20-700 mg/dL (TRIG). Method comparison (N=326 TChol, N=313 TRIG) against Roche Cobas showed high correlation (R=0.995, 0.998; Slope 1.00). Interference testing (EP07/EP37) evaluated numerous endogenous/exogenous substances.
Technological Characteristics
Enzymatic colorimetric assay; reagents include cholesterol esterase, cholesterol oxidase, glycerol kinase, glycerol phosphate oxidase, and peroxidase. Single-use plastic consumable kit with integrated dilution wells and waste containment. Photometric detection at 510 nm (TChol) and 540 nm (TRIG). Standalone operation on TruVerus analyzer. Traceability to NIST SRM1950 (TChol) and IFCC (TRIG).
Indications for Use
Indicated for adults aged 18 and older for quantitative determination of Total Cholesterol and Triglycerides in lithium-heparinized venous whole blood. Aids in diagnosis/treatment of lipid/lipoprotein disorders, diabetes, nephrosis, liver obstruction, and endocrine disorders. Contraindicated for patients with hyperbilirubinemia due to Triglyceride analyte sensitivity.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A cholesterol (total) test system is a device intended to measure cholesterol in plasma and serum. Cholesterol measurements are used in the diagnosis and treatment of disorders involving excess cholesterol in the blood and lipid and lipoprotein metabolism disorders.
{0}
FDA U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION
# 510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION DECISION SUMMARY
ASSAY ONLY
## I Background Information:
A 510(k) Number
K251091
B Applicant
Truvian Health
C Proprietary and Established Names
Lipids
D Regulatory Information
| Product Code(s) | Classification | Regulation Section | Panel |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| CHH | Class I, meets the limitations of exemptions in 862.9(c)(4) | 21 CFR 862.1175 - Cholesterol (Total) Test System | CH - Clinical Chemistry |
| JGY | Class I, meets the limitations of exemptions in 862.9(c)(4) | 21 CFR 862.1705 - Triglyceride test system | CH - Clinical Chemistry |
## II Submission/Device Overview:
A Purpose for Submission:
New Device
B Measurand:
Cholesterol
Triglycerides
Food and Drug Administration
10903 New Hampshire Avenue
Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
www.fda.gov
{1}
K251091 - Page 2 of 12
C Type of Test:
Quantitative, photometric/colorimetric
III Intended Use/Indications for Use:
A Intended Use(s):
See Indications for Use below.
B Indication(s) for Use:
Lipids is part of TruWellness Panel™ and is intended for use on the TruVerus. Lipids (part of the TruWellness Panel) is an in-vitro diagnostic device and intended to be used for the quantitative determination of Total Cholesterol (TChol) and Triglycerides (TRIG) in lithium-heparinized venous whole blood in clinical laboratory or point-of-care settings. From TRIG determination, Very Low-Density Lipoprotein (VLDL) is calculated by the analyzer. Lipids (part of the TruWellness Panel) is an in vitro diagnostic test system that aids the physician in diagnosis and treatment of the following disorders:
Total Cholesterol (TChol): Excess cholesterol in the blood and lipid and lipoprotein disorders.
Triglyceride (TRIG): Diabetes mellitus, nephrosis, liver obstruction, and other diseases involving lipid metabolism; various endocrine disorders.
C Special Conditions for Use Statement(s):
Rx- For Prescription Use Only
Lipids (part of the TruWellness panel) is intended for use with adults aged 18 and older.
The Triglyceride analyte is sensitive to Icterus and is not for use with patients with hyperbilirubinemia (elevated bilirubin levels).
The instrument was validated up to an altitude of 2,000 m (6562 ft). Lipids should not be used above 2,000 m (6562 ft).
D Special Instrument Requirements:
TruVerus was cleared under K251058 with the trade name Tru Analyzer.
IV Device/System Characteristics:
A Device Description:
Lipids contains the following reagents:
| Component | Quantity per Kit |
| --- | --- |
| 4-Aminoantipyrine | 5.6 μg |
| Adenosine-5'-Triphosphate | 17.5 μg |
{2}
| Component | Quantity per Kit |
| --- | --- |
| Catalase | 21.5 U |
| Cholesterol Esterase | ≥ 21.9 mU |
| Cholesterol Oxidase | ≥ 15.4 mU |
| Glycerol Kinase | ≥ 19.1 mU |
| Glycerol Phosphate Oxidase | ≥ 57.3 mU |
| HDAOS | 4.7 μg |
| Peroxidase | > 975.0 mU |
| p-Hydroxybenzenesulfonate | 31.6 μg |
| Sodium N-Ethyl-N-(3-Sulfopropyl)-M-Anisidine | 5.6 μg |
The Single-Use Consumable Kit houses all the components needed to process as well as analyze samples on the TruVerus, including dried reagents, internal process control solutions, barcodes that manage the identity of the kit lot (e.g., Disc and Support Pack ID), calibration information, dilution buffers, and single-use plastic pipette tips. It also serves as a waste container which the user discards of at the end of the run. The Support Pack contains a feature to accept a standard 4 mL blood tube. The Support Pack also houses 22 pipette tips for transferring and mixing samples and reagents, 11 dilution wells to support reagent processing activities within the test system (e.g., sample dilution, reagent dilution, rehydration of dried reagents), and 6 x 2 mL tubes that contain additional wet and dry reagents.
## B Principle of Operation:
### Total cholesterol
This assay is based on the work of Allain et al. and measures the total level of cholesterol by using a multi-step enzymatic system. Cholesterol esters are hydrolyzed by cholesterol esterase to cholesterol and fatty acids. Cholesterol is oxidized by cholesterol oxidase to Δ4-cholestenone with the simultaneous production of an equimolar amount of hydrogen peroxide. In the presence of peroxidase, hydrogen peroxide oxidizes to p-hydroxybenzenesulfonate (p-HBS) and 4-aminoantipyrine (4-AAP) to give a quinoneimine dye colored red, the absorbance of which can be measured at 510 nm. The absorbance is proportional to the concentration of cholesterol in the sample.
### Triglycerides
This assay measures triglyceride concentration in plasma by a series of enzymatic reactions. After hydrolysis by microbial lipases, the triglycerides yield glycerol and free fatty acids (FFA). Glycerol is phosphorylated by adenosine-5'-triphosphate (ATP) to glycerol-1-phosphate (G-1-P) in a reaction catalyzed by glycerol kinase (GK). G-1-P is oxidized to dihydroxyacetone phosphate (DAP) in a reaction catalyzed by glycerol phosphate oxidase (GPO). In this reaction, hydrogen peroxide is produced in equimolar concentration to the level of triglycerides present in the sample. In the indicating Trinder type reaction, hydrogen peroxide reacts with 4-aminoantipyrine (4-AAP) and n-ethyl-n-(3-sulfopropyl)-m-anisidine (ESPAS) in a reaction catalyzed by peroxidase (HPOD). The result of this oxidative coupling is a quinoneimine red-colored dye the absorbance of which can be measured at 540 nm. The absorbance is proportional to the concentration of triglycerides in the sample.
### Very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) cholesterol
VLDL cholesterol is calculated using the following equation that utilizes the triglyceride measurement: VLDL Cholesterol = Triglyceride/5 (if units in mg/dL).
K251091 - Page 3 of 12
{3}
V Substantial Equivalence Information:
A Predicate Device Name(s):
Piccolo Total Cholesterol Test System – K023642
Piccolo Triglycerides Test System – K023639
B Predicate 510(k) Number(s):
K023642 and K023639
C Comparison with Predicate(s):
| Device & Predicate Device(s): | K251091 Candidate | K023642 Predicate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Device Trade Name | Lipids | Piccolo Total Cholesterol Test System |
| General Device Characteristic Similarities | | |
| Intended Use/Indications For Use | In vitro quantitative determination of Total Cholesterol and Triglycerides (TRIG) in heparinized whole blood in clinical laboratory setting or point-of-care location. | Same |
| Measuring Range | TChol: 20 - 520 mg/dL | Same |
| General Device Characteristic Differences | | |
| Sample type | Lithium-heparinized venous whole blood | Heparinized whole blood, heparinized plasma, and serum |
| Device & Predicate Device(s): | K251091 Candidate | K023639 Predicate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Device Trade Name | Lipids | Piccolo Triglycerides Test System |
| General Device Characteristic Similarities | | |
| Intended Use/Indications For Use | In vitro quantitative determination of Total Cholesterol and Triglycerides (TRIG) in heparinized whole blood in clinical laboratory setting or | Same |
K251091 - Page 4 of 12
{4}
| | point-of-care location. | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| General Device Characteristic Differences | | |
| Sample type | Lithium-heparinized venous whole blood | Heparinized whole blood, heparinized plasma, and serum |
| Measuring Range | 20 - 700 mg/dL | 20 - 500 mg/dL |
VI Standards/Guidance Documents Referenced:
Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) EP05-A3, Evaluation of Precision of Quantitative Measurement Procedures; Approved Guideline - Third Edition
CLSI EP06 Ed.2, Evaluation of the Linearity of Quantitative Measurement Procedures
CLSI EP07 Ed.3, Interference Testing in Clinical Chemistry
CLSI EP09c Ed.3, Measurement Procedure Comparison and Bias Estimation Using Patient Samples
CLSI EP17-A2, Evaluation of Detection Capability for Clinical Laboratory Measurement Procedures; Approved Guideline - Second Edition
CLSI EP25 Ed.2, Evaluation of Stability of In Vitro Medical Laboratory Test Reagents
CLSI EP37 Ed.1, Supplemental Tables for Interference Testing in Clinical Chemistry
VII Performance Characteristics (if/when applicable):
A Analytical Performance:
1. Precision/Reproducibility:
A. Reproducibility with control materials.
This study was designed according to CLSI EP05-A3. The study was conducted at 3 external point-of-care (POC) sites, with 3 analyzers per site and at least 3 POC operators per site. Testing was conducted over 5 days using a single lot of consumables and consisted of 3 levels of control samples at low, medium, and high concentrations, with 6 replicates run per day, 3 run in the morning and 3 run in the afternoon (each replicate is run on an individual instrument). Overall, there were at least 90 replicates for each precision control sample level (3 sites x 1 sample x 3 replicates per run x 2 runs per day x 5 days = 90 replicates). The total precision as well as within run, between day, and between site precision were estimated. Results are displayed below.
K251091 - Page 5 of 12
{5}
| Analyte | Level | N | Mean | Within - Run | | Between-Run | | Between-Day | | Between-Site | | Total | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | | | SD | CV% | SD | CV% | SD | CV% | SD | CV% | SD | CV% |
| TChol | Low | 92 | 82 | 2 | 2.6 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 1 | 1.5 | 2 | 3.0 |
| TChol | Med | 91 | 189 | 4 | 2.3 | 1 | 0.4 | 0 | 0.0 | 2 | 1.0 | 5 | 2.6 |
| TChol | High | 92 | 228 | 3 | 1.5 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 2 | 1.1 | 4 | 1.9 |
| TRIG | Low | 92 | 88 | 2 | 1.8 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 1 | 0.9 | 2 | 2.0 |
| TRIG | Med | 91 | 136 | 3 | 2.1 | 1 | 0.4 | 1 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 3 | 2.2 |
| TRIG | High | 92 | 452 | 5 | 1.1 | 0 | 0.0 | 1 | 0.3 | 1 | 0.2 | 5 | 1.1 |
B. Whole blood precision
This study was evaluated at five sites collecting samples from intended use population with normal and abnormal analyte levels. At least 20 subjects were enrolled at each site and for each test subject, eight replicates were measured across four instruments and two operators. The SD and CV% were calculated by pooling subject standard deviations and/or % CV for predefined Low, Medium, and High sub-intervals selected to represent normal and abnormal regions of the analytical measuring range and encompassing medical decision levels. Pooled imprecision is considered a representative estimate of reproducibility that include variability of sites, instruments, operators, days and repeatability.
| Analyte | Range (mg/dL) | Subjects (N) | Mean (mg/dL) | SD | CV% |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| TChol | 20–200 | 93 | 139 | 3.5 | 2.5 |
| TChol | 200–240 | 10 | 214 | 4.8 | 2.3 |
| TChol | 240–520 | 9 | 313 | 8.2 | 2.6 |
| TRIG | 20–150 | 69 | 91 | 2.2 | 2.9 |
| TRIG | 150–250 | 25 | 184 | 3.6 | 1.9 |
| TRIG | 250–700 | 9 | 339 | 5.7 | 1.6 |
C. Whole blood between-lot precision.
22 subjects consisting of 6 healthy individuals and 16 individuals in various disease states were enrolled at a single point-of-care clinical site and tested across 3 lots of the candidate panel on 3 individual analyzers by 2 operators. A total of 6 replicates per subject participant, 2 replicates per lot, were tested by 1 of the 2 operators. Results below present the number of subjects evaluated, the % difference from the mean and pooled %CV by lot and by analyte.
| Analyte | N-Subjects Per Lot | Mean relative difference % | | | Pooled %CV | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | Lot-A | Lot-B | Lot-C | Lot-A | Lot-B | Lot-C |
| TCHOL | 22 | -0.5% | -0.5% | 1.0% | 2.6 % | 2.1 % | 1.9 % |
| TRIG | 21 | 0.7% | -0.7% | 0.0% | 2.5 % | 2.0 % | 1.8% |
D. Control between-lot reproducibility.
To evaluate the lot-to-lot reproducibility for the assays, three (3) control samples (Low, Medium, High) were tested on 3 analyzers with 3 lots of the candidate test. Each sample level was tested with at least five (5) replicates on one analyzer each day with each single-use consumable kit lot
K251091 - Page 6 of 12
{6}
over three (3) days to achieve a minimum of fifteen (15) replicates per sample level and kit lot. Results are displayed below:
| Analyte | Sample | Units | N | Mean | SD | | | CV% | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | | | | Lot 1 | Lot 2 | Lot 3 | Lot 1 | Lot 2 | Lot 3 |
| TChol | Low | mg/dL | 45 | 84.5 | 2.25 | 1.40 | 2.13 | 2.7% | 1.7% | 2.5% |
| TChol | Medium | mg/dL | 45 | 193.8 | 2.32 | 3.77 | 3.33 | 1.2% | 1.9% | 1.7% |
| TChol | High | mg/dL | 45 | 231.7 | 3.27 | 5.56 | 3.07 | 1.4% | 2.4% | 1.3% |
| Trig | Low | mg/dL | 45 | 89.3 | 1.43 | 1.83 | 1.84 | 1.6% | 2.1% | 2.0% |
| Trig | Medium | mg/dL | 45 | 138.3 | 1.59 | 1.81 | 1.67 | 1.2% | 1.3% | 1.2% |
| Trig | High | mg/dL | 45 | 454.4 | 4.29 | 12.42 | 3.73 | 0.9% | 1.0% | 0.8% |
## 2. Linearity:
Linearity testing was performed in accordance with CLSI document EP06-Ed2. Linearity was assessed using multiple panels of samples. The linear range for total cholesterol and triglycerides were determined by testing nine (9) whole blood samples containing varying concentrations of analyte. Each sample was tested in quadruplicate, using one (1) kit lot, across four (4) analyzers, on a single day. The results of the study supported the claimed linear interval for TChol and Trig. Within the claimed analytical measuring range, the maximum observed deviation from linearity for TChol and TRIG were <2% and <4% respectively.
## 3. Analytical Specificity/Interference:
Potential interference from endogenous and exogenous substances with the assays was evaluated following CLSI EP07-A3 and EP37 guidelines. Testing was performed with contrived lithium heparin whole blood samples from healthy donor population using two (2) analyte concentration levels targeted based on the recommendation in CLSI EP07. Endogenous and exogenous substances were spiked into samples at two targeted analyte concentration levels: approximately 150 mg/dL and 220 mg/dL for TChol, 100 mg/dL and 250 mg/dL for TRIG. For substances identified as an interferent, dose response testing was conducted to assess the highest concentration limit below which no significant interference was observed. Interference is defined as the analyte result shifted by more than 10% between the test and control samples*.
### Endogenous Substances
| Substance | Maximum Concentration without Interference (mg/dL) | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | Total Cholesterol | Triglyceride |
| Hemoglobin | 122 | 154 |
| Conjugated | 4.1 | < 200 |
| Bilirubin | | > 200 |
| Unconjugated | 5.0 | < 200 |
| Bilirubin | | > 200 |
| Triglycerides | 1814 | N/A |
* Low level Conjugated Bilirubin testing showed ≤11% bias
K251091 - Page 7 of 12
{7}
Exogenous Substances
| Substance | Max Concentration without Interference (mg/dL) | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | Total Cholesterol | Triglycerides |
| Acetaminophen | 15.6 | 15.6 |
| Acetylsalicylic acid | 3 | 3 |
| Ampicillin | 7.5 | 7.5 |
| Cefoxitin | 495 | 660 |
| Cyclosporine | 0.18 | 0.18 |
| Doxycycline | 1.8 | 1.8 |
| Heparin | 3,300 U/L | 3,300 U/L |
| Ibuprofen | 10.95 | 21.9 |
| Levodopa (L-Dopa) | 0.75 | 0.3 |
| Methyldopa | 1.12 | 0.78 |
| Metronidazole | 12.3 | 12.3 |
| Phenylbutazone | 16.05 | 24.08 |
| Rifampicin | 4.8 | 4.8 |
| Theophylline | 6 | 6 |
| Acetylcysteine | 15 | 5 |
| Ascorbic Acid | 5.25 | 1.75 |
| Calcium Dobesilate | 3 | 1.5 |
| Acetoacetate | 20 | 20 |
| Atorvastatin | 0.075 | 0.075 |
| Beta-Hydroxybutyrate | 333 | 750 |
| Caffeine | 10.8 | 10.8 |
| Cefotaxime | 52.8 | 52.8 |
| Cephalothin (Keflin) | 180 | 180 |
| Cimetidine | 3 | 3 |
| Creatinine | 15 | 15 |
| Cysteine | 10 | 5 |
| Digoxin | 0.0039 | 0.0039 |
| Dipyrone | 3.3 | 3.3 |
| Dobutamine | 0.121 | 0.121 |
| Fenofibrate | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Fructose | 18 | 18 |
| Gemfibrozil (Lopid) | 13.8 | 13.8 |
| Glutathione | 15 | 3.75 |
| Isoniazide | 6 | 6 |
| Lactate Lithium | 90 | 90 |
| Lactose | 100 | 100 |
| Lidocaine | 1.5 | 1.5 |
| Lovastatin (Mevacor) | 0.021 | 0.021 |
| Methotrexate | 102 | 54.4 |
| Nicotinic Acid (Niacin) | 10 | 10 |
K251091 - Page 8 of 12
{8}
| Substance | Max Concentration without Interference (mg/dL) | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | Total Cholesterol | Triglycerides |
| Phenytoin | 6 | 6 |
| Pravastatin | 0.0207 | 0.0207 |
| Rosuvastatin | 0.0111 | 0.0111 |
| Salicylic Acid | 2.86 | 2.86 |
| Simvastatin | 0.168 | 0.168 |
| Sodium Methicillin | 7.5 | 7.5 |
| Urea | 120 | 120 |
| Uric Acid | 23.5 | 23.5 |
The sponsor provided adequate information to support hemolysis, icterus and lipemia flags will detect samples subject to these interferences.
## 4. Assay Reportable Range:
The TruVerus Analyzer will report results within the AMR as listed in the table below.
| Analyte | AMR |
| --- | --- |
| Total Cholesterol (mg/dL) | 20–520 |
| Triglycerides (mg/dL) | 20–700 |
## 5. Traceability, Stability, Expected Values (Controls, Calibrators, or Methods):
Traceability
The sponsor claims the following regarding traceability:
| Assay | Traceable Material |
| --- | --- |
| Total Cholesterol | NIST SRM1950 |
| Triglycerides | IFCC through commercial materials |
## Sample Stability
Sample stability studies performed demonstrated that samples measured on the candidate tests are stable for 60-minutes post-collection.
## Open Pouch Stability and Open Disc Stability
The open disc stability study supports an open disc stability of 4 minutes when used on TruVerus at the following operating condition limits: 15°C - 30°C and 8% - 60% RH.
## 6. Detection Limit:
Detection limits were determined in accordance with recommendations in the CLSI EP17-A2 guideline.
K251091 - Page 9 of 12
{9}
The Limit of Blank (LoB) corresponds to the highest measurement result that is likely to be observed for a blank sample. The assay is designed to have a LoB ≤ Limit of Detection (LoD).
The Limit of Detection (LoD) corresponds to the lowest concentration of analyte that can be detected with a probability of 95%. The assay is designed to have an LoD ≤ Limit of Quantitation (LoQ).
The Limit of Quantitation (LoQ) corresponds to the lowest concentration of analyte in a sample that had a CV ≤ 20%. Detection limits are provided in the table below.
LoD and LoQ were established in Li-Hep whole blood samples.
| Analyte | LoB | LoD | LoQ |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Total Cholesterol (mg/dL) | 3.76 | 6 | 7 |
| Triglycerides (mg/dL) | 12.45 | 14 | 16 |
7. Assay Cut-Off:
Not applicable.
B Comparison Studies:
1. Method Comparison with Predicate Device:
Whole blood specimens were collected from subjects at five external sites to evaluate the accuracy of the Lipids test. Specimens comprised of apparently healthy patient samples and samples from patients with acute or chronic health conditions were collected from 5 point-of-care sites, tested by at least 3 point-of-care operators per site, on at least 4 analyzers per site, using 10 lots of reagents. Results (using Passing Bablok regression) compared against a legally marketed comparator are displayed below. The data demonstrated that accuracy was consistent across sites.
| Analyte | N | Range (mg/dL) | Slope | Intercept | R |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| TChol | 326 | 23 – 475 | 1.00 (0.98, 1.01) | -4.00 (-5.0, -1.43) | 0.995 |
| Trig | 313 | 29-683 | 1.00 (0.99, 1.01) | -6.00 (-6.05, -4.26) | 0.998 |
Predicted Differences at Medical Decision Levels (MDLs)
| | | All | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | MDL (mg/dL) | Bias | %Bias |
| Total CHOL | 90 | -4.0 | -4.4% |
| | 200 | -4.0 | -2.0% |
| | 240 | -4.0 | -1.7% |
K251091 - Page 10 of 12
{10}
| | | All | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | MDL (mg/dL) | Bias | %Bias |
| TRIG | 150 | -6.0 | -4.0% |
| | 400 | -6.0 | -1.5% |
| | 500 | -6.0 | -1.2% |
2. Matrix Comparison:
Not applicable.
## C Clinical Studies:
1. Clinical Sensitivity:
Not applicable
2. Clinical Specificity:
Not applicable
3. Other Clinical Supportive Data (When 1. and 2. Are Not Applicable):
High Altitude Study
An altitude study was conducted to evaluate the Lipids test at sea-level and a high altitude of 2000 meters. The results demonstrated acceptable performance at both tested altitude conditions.
## D Clinical Cut-Off:
Not applicable
## E Expected Values/Reference Range:
The sponsor provided the following risk classification intervals for TChol and TRIG based on scientific literature¹.
| Analyte | | Reference Range (mg/dL) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Total Cholesterol | Desirable | <200 |
| | Borderline | 200 - 239 |
| | High | ≥ 240 |
| Triglycerides | Normal | < 150 |
| | Borderline High | 150 – 199 |
| | High | 200 – 499 |
K251091 - Page 11 of 12
{11}
| Analyte | | Reference Range (mg/dL) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | Very High | ≥ 500 |
$^{1}$ National Cholesterol Education Program. Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III). National Institutes of Health, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, NIH Publication No. 01-3670, May 2001.
## VIII Proposed Labeling:
The labeling supports the finding of substantial equivalence for this device.
## IX Conclusion:
The submitted information in this premarket notification is complete and supports a substantial equivalence decision.
K251091 - Page 12 of 12
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.