K250643 · Hangzhou Kangji Medical Instrument Co., Ltd. · FZP · Nov 20, 2025 · General, Plastic Surgery
Device Facts
Record ID
K250643
Device Name
Disposable Polymer Ligation Clips
Applicant
Hangzhou Kangji Medical Instrument Co., Ltd.
Product Code
FZP · General, Plastic Surgery
Decision Date
Nov 20, 2025
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 878.4300
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic
Indications for Use
The Disposable polymer ligation clips are intended for use in procedures involving ligation of vessels or tissue structures. Surgeons should apply the appropriate size clip for the size of the vessel or tissue structure to be ligated such that the clip completely encompasses the vessel or tissue structure.
Device Story
Disposable, non-absorbable, non-active implantable polymer clips; used for vessel or tissue ligation in general surgery. Clips housed in cartridges; manually loaded into reusable, non-sterile clip appliers (Kangji-manufactured). Surgeon places clip around tissue; closes via applier grip. Output is a secured, ligated vessel/tissue structure. Benefits include reliable hemostasis or tissue closure. Used in clinical/surgical settings by surgeons. Device supplied sterile (EO); single-use.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical data. Bench testing only: appearance, dimension, assembly firmness, matching, locking, toughness, clamping, tensile, and pressure endurance performance. Biocompatibility per ISO 10993 (cytotoxicity, sensitization, irritation, pyrogenicity, implantation, chemical characterization, toxicological risk assessment). Sterilization and shelf-life validated per ISO/EN standards.
Technological Characteristics
Material: medical grade acetyl homopolymer. Principle: mechanical ligation via clip applier. Form factor: clips in cartridges (various sizes M, ML, L, XL). Sterilization: EO (10^-6 SAL). Standards: ISO 10993 (biocompatibility), ISO 11607 (packaging), EN ISO 11135 (sterilization), ISTA 2A/3A (transportation).
Indications for Use
Indicated for ligation of vessels or tissue structures during general surgical procedures. No specific age or gender restrictions; contraindicated if the clip size is inappropriate for the vessel or tissue structure.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
An implantable clip is a clip-like device intended to connect internal tissues to aid healing. It is not absorbable.
{0}
FDA
U.S. FOOD & DRUG
ADMINISTRATION
November 20, 2025
Hangzhou Kangji Medical Instrument Co., Ltd.
% Esther Zhang
Official Correspondent
Shanghai Ling Fu Technology Co., Ltd.
4F No. 585-2, Wanyuan Rd. Minhang District
Shanghai,
China
Re: K250643
Trade/Device Name: Disposable Polymer Ligation Clips
Regulation Number: 21 CFR 878.4300
Regulation Name: Implantable clip
Regulatory Class: Class II
Product Code: FZP
Dated: October 21, 2025
Received: October 21, 2025
Dear Esther Zhang:
We have reviewed your section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database available at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
{1}
K250643 - Esther Zhang
Page 2
Additional information about changes that may require a new premarket notification are provided in the FDA guidance documents entitled "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99812/download) and "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Software Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99785/download).
Your device is also subject to, among other requirements, the Quality System (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820), which includes, but is not limited to, 21 CFR 820.30, Design controls; 21 CFR 820.90, Nonconforming product; and 21 CFR 820.100, Corrective and preventive action. Please note that regardless of whether a change requires premarket review, the QS regulation requires device manufacturers to review and approve changes to device design and production (21 CFR 820.30 and 21 CFR 820.70) and document changes and approvals in the device master record (21 CFR 820.181).
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR Part 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reporting-combination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR Parts 1000-1050.
All medical devices, including Class I and unclassified devices and combination product device constituent parts are required to be in compliance with the final Unique Device Identification System rule ("UDI Rule"). The UDI Rule requires, among other things, that a device bear a unique device identifier (UDI) on its label and package (21 CFR 801.20(a)) unless an exception or alternative applies (21 CFR 801.20(b)) and that the dates on the device label be formatted in accordance with 21 CFR 801.18. The UDI Rule (21 CFR 830.300(a) and 830.320(b)) also requires that certain information be submitted to the Global Unique Device Identification Database (GUDID) (21 CFR Part 830 Subpart E). For additional information on these requirements, please see the UDI System webpage at https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance/unique-device-identification-system-udi-system.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reporting-mdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about medical devices and radiation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-
{2}
K250643 - Esther Zhang
Page 3
assistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
# Alexander Nguyen -S
for Tek N. Lamichhane, Ph.D.
Assistant Director
DHT4B: Division of Plastic and
Reconstructive Surgery Devices
OHT4: Office of Surgical and
Infection Control Devices
Office of Product Evaluation and Quality
Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{3}
FORM FDA 3881 (8/23)
Page 1 of 1
PSC Publishing Services (301) 443-6740
EF
| DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Food and Drug Administration Indications for Use | Form Approved: OMB No. 0910-0120 Expiration Date: 07/31/2026 See PRA Statement below. |
| --- | --- |
| 510(k) Number (if known) K250643 | |
| Device Name Disposable polymer ligation clips | |
| Indications for Use (Describe) The Disposable Polymer Ligation Clips are intended for use in procedures involving ligation of vessels or tissue structures. Surgeons should apply the appropriate size clip for the size of the vessel or tissue structure to be ligated such that the clip completely encompasses the vessel or tissue structure. | |
| Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable) ☑ Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) ☐ Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C) | |
| CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED. | |
| This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.* | |
| The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to: Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov | |
| "An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number." | |
{4}
K250643 Page 1 of 7
510(k) summary
I Submitter
Device submitter: Hangzhou Kangji Medical Instrument Co., Ltd.
No. 1668 Chunjiang East Road, Economic Development Zone, Tonglu, Hangzhou, 311501, China.
Contact person: Martin Sun
Manager of Regulatory Affairs
Phone: +86-0571-69901712
Fax: +86-0571-69901712
Email: ra01@hzkangji.com
Date prepared: Nov 20, 2025
II Device
Trade Name of Device: Disposable polymer ligation clips
Common Name: ligation clip
Regulation Number: 21 CFR 878.4300
Regulation Name: Implantable clip
Regulatory Class: II
Product code: FZP
Review Panel: General and Plastic Surgery
III Correspondent
Shanghai Ling Fu Technology Co., Ltd.
4F No. 585-2, Wanyuan Rd. Minhang District, Shanghai, P.R.China
Contact: Esther ZHANG
Email: Esther.zhang@llins-tech.com
IV Device description
The Disposable polymer ligation clips includes Polymer Clips and Multiple polymer clips. The devices are sterilized by EO, single-use, non-absorbable, non-active implantable devices designed for use in general surgical procedures that require vessel or tissue ligation. The Disposable polymer ligation clips are compatible with the reusable, non-sterile Clip appliers which are made by Kangji. The clips are placed around the tissue and closed with the grip of a clip applier. These clips are made of medical grade acetyl homopolymer and supplied in different sizes and packaged in different clip quantity.
{5}
K250643 Page 2 of 7
Polymer Clips are housed in a colored cartridge which is consist of base and platen. The clips shall be placed and fired in clip applicer one by one. Polymer Clips are available in four sizes: M, ML, L, XL.
Multiple polymer clips (model: KJ-JZJDML, KJ-JZJDL, KJ-JZJDXL) are available in 3 sizes (ML, L, XL), housed in a colored cartridge and has 3 clips which can be placed in clip applicer in one time and fired constantly totally 3 times.
Multiple polymer clips (except model: KJ-JZJDML, KJ-JZJDL, KJ-JZJDXL) are available in ML and L size, housed in a striped cartridge. The cartridge which contains 5-15 clips will be placed in clip applicer. The clips will be delivered individually advance after each firing.
## V Indications for use
The Disposable polymer ligation clips are intended for use in procedures involving ligation of vessels or tissue structures. Surgeons should apply the appropriate size clip for the size of the vessel or tissue structure to be ligated such that the clip completely encompasses the vessel or tissue structure.
## VI Substantial Equivalence
The proposed Disposable polymer ligation clips are substantially equivalent to the predicate devices:
| Model of proposed device | Predicate device | Manufacturer | 510(k) No. |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Polymer Clips | Hem-O-Lok® ligation clips | Weck Closure Systems | K993157 |
| Multiple Polymer Clips | Weck Auto Endo5® 5mm Automatic Endoscopic 35cm Applier (Hem-o-lok® ligating clips) | Teleflex Medical Incorporated | K230480 |
Table 1 compares the model-Polymer clips to the Hem-O-Lok® ligation clips(Weck Closure Systems) with respect to intended use, and technological characteristics, providing detailed information regarding the basis for the determination of substantial equivalence.
{6}
K250643 Page 3 of 7
Table 1 Comparison of Polymer clips to the predicate device
| Device feature | Predicate Device K993157 (Hem-O-Lok®) | Subject Device (Polymer Clips, Multiple Polymer Clips (model: KJ-JZJDML, KJ-JZJDL, KJ-JZJDXL)) | Comment |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Indications for use | Hem-O-Lok® ligating clips are intended for use in procedures involving ligation of vessels or tissue structures. Surgeons should apply the appropriate size clip for the size of the vessel or tissue structure to be ligated such that the clip completely encompasses the vessel or tissue structure. | It is intended for use in procedures involving ligation of vessels or tissue structures. Surgeons should apply the appropriate size clip for the size of the vessel or tissue structure to be ligated such that the clip completely encompasses the vessel or tissue structure. | Equivalent |
| Product code | FZP | FZP | Equivalent |
| Reuse durability | Single use | Single use | Equivalent |
| Sterility | EtO at 10-6SAL | EtO at 10-6SAL | Equivalent |
| Size | M, ML, L, XL | M, ML, L, XL | Equivalent |
| Composition | Polyacetal | Acetyl homopolymer (which is the same as Polyacetal) | Equivalent |
| Processing | Injection molding | Injection molding | Equivalent |
# Conclusion:
The subject and predicate device have the same intended use. The technological characteristics of this product are believed to be substantially equivalent as those for the predicate device. This device and its predicate are substantially equivalent in material and manufacturing methods. The subject and predicate device designs are nearly identical. There are no new questions raised regarding to safety and effectiveness.
{7}
K250643 Page 4 of 7
Table 2 compares the model-Multiple polymer clips to the Weck Auto Endo5® 5mm Automatic Endoscopic 35cm Applier (Hem-o-lok® ligating clips)(Teleflex Medical Incorporated) with respect to intended use, and technological characteristics, providing detailed information regarding the basis for the determination of substantial equivalence.
Table 2 Comparison of Multiple polymer clips to the predicate device
| Device feature | Predicate Device K230480 (Hem-o-lok® ligating clips) | Subject Device (Multiple Polymer Clips) | Comment |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Indications for use | Hem-O-Lok® ligating clips are intended for use in procedures involving ligation of vessels or tissue structures. Surgeons should apply the appropriate size clip for the size of the vessel or tissue structure to be ligated such that the clip completely encompasses the vessel or tissue structure. | It is intended for use in procedures involving ligation of vessels or tissue structures. Surgeons should apply the appropriate size clip for the size of the vessel or tissue structure to be ligated such that the clip completely encompasses the vessel or tissue structure. | Equivalent |
| Product code | FZP | FZP | Equivalent |
| Reuse durability | Single use | Single use | Equivalent |
| Sterility | EtO at 10-6SAL | EtO at 10-6SAL | Equivalent |
| Size | ML | ML, L | Equivalent |
| Amount of clip in a cartridge | 15 | 5 to 15 | Difference comment 1 |
| Composition | Polymer | Acetyl homopolymer (which is the same as Polyacetal) | Equivalent |
| Processing | Injection molding | Injection molding | Equivalent |
| Packaging | The clips are housed in a cartridge and preloaded | The clips are housed in a cartridge and packed | Difference comment 2 |
{8}
K250643 Page 5 of 7
| Device feature | Predicate Device K230480 (Hem-o-lok® ligating clips) | Subject Device (Multiple Polymer Clips) | Comment |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | inside the clip applier | in a dialysis paper with Tyvek coted | |
Comment 1
Subject device has a wider range of amount of clip in a cartridge than predicate device, which can provide more choice for surgical clips quantity demand. Surgeons will make decision on how many clips are needed. This difference does not affect the basic design principle, usage, effectiveness and safety of the subject device. There are no new questions raised regarding to safety and effectiveness.
Comment 2
The packing way of two devices is different. they are both housed in a cartridge, while the predicate device is housed in a cartridge and preloaded in the clip applier and the subject device comes separately from the clip applier in its own sterile packaging. The subject will be placed in a clip applier after tearing off the primary package. And then the use of clips relies on the clip applier which is same as the predicate device. The package was addressed by ISO 11607-1, ISO 11607-2 and ASTM F1980 to maintain the sterility of product. This difference does not affect the basic design principle, usage, effectiveness and safety of the subject device. There are no new questions raised regarding to safety and effectiveness.
Conclusion:
The Multiple Polymer Clips and Hem-o-lok® ligating clips in predicate device have the same intended use. The technological characteristics of this product are believed to be substantially equivalent as those for the predicate device. This device and its predicate are substantially equivalent in material and manufacturing methods. The subject and predicate device designs are nearly identical. The differences in technological characteristics between the subject and predicate devices (i.e., different size, amount, packing way) do not raise new questions of safety and effectiveness.
{9}
K250643 Page 6 of 7
## Summary of comparison with the predicate devices:
The subject and predicate devices have the same intended use and application. The subject and predicate device designs are nearly identical. They are single-use devices. The differences in technological characteristics between the subject and predicate devices (i.e., different size, packing way) do not raise new questions of safety and effectiveness.
## VII Summary of non-clinical testing
### Performance testing
The Disposable polymer ligation clips has been evaluated through performance studies and bench testing, as attached in Appendix C. Testing encompassed appearance, dimension, assembly firmness, matching performance, locking performance, toughness, clamping performance, tensile performance, pressure endurance performance. All the test results were assessed and deemed substantially equivalent to the predicate device.
### Biocompatibility testing
Biocompatibility of the Disposable polymer ligation clips was evaluated in accordance with ISO 10993-1:2018 for the body contact category.
Table 3 List of biocompatibility test
| Item | Biological endpoints | Standard | Test result |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | Cytotoxicity | ISO 10993-5:2009 | Pass |
| 2 | Sensitization | ISO 10993-10:2021 | Pass |
| 3 | Irritation | ISO 10993-23:2021 | Pass |
| 4 | Material mediated pyrogenicity | ISO 10993-11:2017 | Pass |
| 5 | Implantation effects | ISO 10993-6:2016 | Pass |
| 6 | Chemical characterization | 10993-18:2020/Amd 1:2022 | Pass |
| 7 | Toxicological risk assessment | ISO 10993-17:2023 | Pass |
### Sterilization and shelf life testing
- EO sterilization validation per EN ISO 11135-1, 11737-1, 11737-2
- Transportation test per ISTA 2A:2011 and ISTA 3A:2018
- Packaging validation per ISO 11607-1/-2
- The 3 years shelf life of the device is determined based on stability study which includes ageing test.
- Bacterial Endotoxin Testing per USP-NF:2023 <85>
{10}
K250643 Page 7 of 7
## VIII Summary of clinical testing
None.
## IX Conclusion
The Disposable polymer ligation clips are substantially equivalent to its predicate devices. The differences between the predicate and subject device do not raise any new or different questions of safety or effectiveness. The non-clinical testing demonstrates that the device is as safe, as effective and performs as well as the legally marketed device.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.