K250591 · Momentis Surgical , Ltd. · QNM · Jun 6, 2025 · General, Plastic Surgery
Device Facts
Record ID
K250591
Device Name
Anovo Surgical System (6Ne)
Applicant
Momentis Surgical , Ltd.
Product Code
QNM · General, Plastic Surgery
Decision Date
Jun 6, 2025
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 878.4961
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic
Indications for Use
The Anovo Surgical System is an endoscopic instrument control system that is intended to assist in the accurate control of the Instrument ARMS during single site, natural orifice transvaginal benign laparoscopic-assisted surgical procedures listed below. The Anovo Surgical System is indicated for use in adult patients. It is intended to be used by trained physicians in an operating room environment. The representative uses of the Anovo Surgical System are indicated for the following benign procedures: • Total benign hysterectomy with salpingo-oophorectomy • Total benign hysterectomy with salpingectomy • Total benign hysterectomy • Salpingectomy • Oophorectomy • Adnexectomy • Ovarian cyst removal
Device Story
Endoscopic instrument control system; assists surgeon in controlling Instrument ARMS during single-site, transvaginal benign laparoscopic-assisted procedures. System components: two Instrument ARMS, Surgeon Console, Robotic Control Unit (RCU), Pedestal, and accessories. Surgeon sits at console outside sterile zone; manipulates ARMS Controllers to move instruments. Modification adds support for optional off-the-shelf endoscope arm (SOLOASSIST II) to hold/manipulate endoscope via surgeon console, replacing manual assistant manipulation. Surgeon views surgical site via standard OR visualization system. System facilitates precise instrument control; potentially improves surgical efficiency and ergonomics for physician; benefits patient through minimally invasive approach.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical data. Evidence includes bench testing (dimensional, mechanical, functional), software verification/validation (IEC 62304), cybersecurity testing (FD&C Act 524B), electrical safety/EMC (IEC 60601 series), human factors validation (ISO/IEC 62366-1) with surgeons in simulated OR, and a pre-clinical female cadaver study demonstrating successful completion of surgical tasks.
Indicated for adult patients undergoing single-site, natural orifice transvaginal benign laparoscopic-assisted procedures, including total hysterectomy (with/without salpingo-oophorectomy/salpingectomy), salpingectomy, oophorectomy, adnexectomy, and ovarian cyst removal.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A mountable electromechanical surgical system for transluminal approaches is a software-controlled, patient bed- and/or operating table-mounted electromechanical surgical system with human/device interfaces that allows a qualified user to perform transluminal endoscopic or laparoscopic surgical procedures using surgical instruments attached to an electromechanical arm.
Special Controls
*Classification.* Class II (special controls). The special controls for this device are:(1) The device manufacturer must develop, and update as necessary, a device-specific use training program that ensures proper device setup/use/shutdown, accurate control of instruments to perform the intended surgical procedures, troubleshooting and handling during unexpected events or emergencies, and safe practices to mitigate use error.
(2) The device manufacturer may only distribute the device to facilities that implement and maintain the device-specific use training program and ensure that users of the device have completed the device-specific use training program.
(3) The device manufacturer must conduct and complete post-market surveillance, including an impact of the training program on user learning, behavior, and performance, in accordance with an FDA-agreed-upon protocol. The device manufacturer must submit post-market surveillance reports that contain current data and findings in accordance with the FDA-agreed-upon protocol.
(4) The device manufacturer must submit a report to FDA annually on the anniversary of initial marketing authorization for the device, until such time as FDA may terminate such reporting, which comprises the following information:
(i) Cumulative summary, by year, of complaints and adverse events since date of initial marketing authorization; and
(ii) Identification and rationale for changes made to the device, labeling or device-specific use training program, which did not require submission of a premarket notification during the reporting period.
(5) Labeling must include:
(i) A detailed summary of clinical performance testing conducted with the device, including study population, results, adverse events, and comparisons to any comparator groups identified;
(ii) A statement in the labeling that the safety and effectiveness of the device has not been evaluated for outcomes related to the treatment or prevention of cancer, including but not limited to risk reduction, overall survival, disease-free survival and local recurrence, unless FDA determines that it can be removed or modified based on clinical performance data submitted to FDA;
(iii) Identification of compatible devices;
(iv) The list of surgical procedures for which the device has been determined to be safe with clinical justification;
(v) Reprocessing instructions for reusable components;
(vi) A shelf life for any sterile components;
(vii) A description of the device-specific use training program;
(viii) A statement that the device is only for distribution to facilities that implement and maintain the device-specific use training program and ensure that users of the device have completed the device-specific use training program; and
(ix) A detailed summary of the post-market surveillance data collected under paragraph (b)(3) of this section and any necessary modifications to the labeling to accurately reflect outcomes based upon the post-market surveillance data collected under paragraph (b)(3) of this section.
(6) Clinical performance testing must demonstrate that the device performs as intended under anticipated conditions of use.
(7) Human factors validation testing must be performed and must demonstrate that the user interfaces of the system support safe use in an operating room environment.
(8) Non-clinical performance testing must demonstrate that the device performs as intended under anticipated conditions of use and must include:
(i) Device motion accuracy and precision;
(ii) System testing;
(iii) Instrument reliability;
(iv) Thermal effects on tissue;
(v) Human-device interface;
(vi) Mounting hardware testing;
(vii) Workspace access testing; and
(viii) Performance testing with compatible devices.
(9) Software verification, validation, and hazard analysis must be performed. Software documentation must include an assessment of the impact of threats and vulnerabilities on device functionality and end users/patients as part of cybersecurity review.
(10) Electromagnetic compatibility and electrical, thermal, and mechanical safety testing must be performed.
(11) Performance data must demonstrate the sterility of all patient-contacting device components.
(12) Performance data must support the shelf life of the device components provided sterile by demonstrating continued sterility and package integrity over the labeled shelf life.
(13) Performance data must validate the reprocessing instructions for the reusable components of the device.
(14) Performance data must demonstrate that all patient-contacting components of the device are biocompatible.
(15) Performance data must demonstrate that all patient-contacting components of the device are non-pyrogenic.
{0}
FDA U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION
June 6, 2025
Momentis Surgical Ltd.
Maya Leib Shlomo
VP QA/RA
6 Yoni Netanyahu Street
Or Yehuda, 6037604
Israel
Re: K250591
Trade/Device Name: Anovo Surgical System (6Ne)
Regulation Number: 21 CFR 878.4961
Regulation Name: Mountable Electromechanical Surgical System For Transluminal Approaches
Regulatory Class: Class II
Product Code: QNM
Dated: February 27, 2025
Received: May 9, 2025
Dear Maya Leib Shlomo:
We have reviewed your section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database available at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Additional information about changes that may require a new premarket notification are provided in the FDA guidance documents entitled "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Change to an Existing Device"
U.S. Food & Drug Administration
10903 New Hampshire Avenue
Silver Spring, MD 20993
www.fda.gov
{1}
K250591 - Maya Leib Shlomo
Page 2
(https://www.fda.gov/media/99812/download) and "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Software Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99785/download).
Your device is also subject to, among other requirements, the Quality System (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820), which includes, but is not limited to, 21 CFR 820.30, Design controls; 21 CFR 820.90, Nonconforming product; and 21 CFR 820.100, Corrective and preventive action. Please note that regardless of whether a change requires premarket review, the QS regulation requires device manufacturers to review and approve changes to device design and production (21 CFR 820.30 and 21 CFR 820.70) and document changes and approvals in the device master record (21 CFR 820.181).
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR Part 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reporting-combination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR Parts 1000-1050.
All medical devices, including Class I and unclassified devices and combination product device constituent parts are required to be in compliance with the final Unique Device Identification System rule ("UDI Rule"). The UDI Rule requires, among other things, that a device bear a unique device identifier (UDI) on its label and package (21 CFR 801.20(a)) unless an exception or alternative applies (21 CFR 801.20(b)) and that the dates on the device label be formatted in accordance with 21 CFR 801.18. The UDI Rule (21 CFR 830.300(a) and 830.320(b)) also requires that certain information be submitted to the Global Unique Device Identification Database (GUDID) (21 CFR Part 830 Subpart E). For additional information on these requirements, please see the UDI System webpage at https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance/unique-device-identification-system-udi-system.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reporting-mdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about medical devices and radiation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-
{2}
K250591 - Maya Leib Shlomo
Page 3
assistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
Mark
Trumbore-S
Digitally signed by Mark Trumbore-S
Date: 2025.06.06
08:32:23 -04'00'
Mark Trumbore Ph.D.
Assistant Director
DHT4A: Division of General Surgery Devices
OHT4: Office of Surgical and
Infection Control Devices
Office of Product Evaluation and Quality
Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{3}
Anovo Surgical System
Page 10 of 68
| Indications for Use | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Please type in the marketing application/submission number, if it is known. This textbox will be left blank for original applications/submissions. | K250591 | ? |
| Please provide the device trade name(s). | | ? |
| Anovo Surgical System (6Ne) | | |
| Please provide your Indications for Use below. | | ? |
| The Anovo Surgical System is an endoscopic instrument control system that is intended to assist in the accurate control of the Instrument ARMS during single site, natural orifice transvaginal benign laparoscopic-assisted surgical procedures listed below. The Anovo Surgical System is indicated for use in adult patients. It is intended to be used by trained physicians in an operating room environment.
The representative uses of the Anovo Surgical System are indicated for the following benign procedures:
• Total benign hysterectomy with salpingo-oophorectomy
• Total benign hysterectomy with salpingectomy
• Total benign hysterectomy
• Salpingectomy
• Oophorectomy
• Adnexectomy
• Ovarian cyst removal | | |
| Please select the types of uses (select one or both, as applicable). | ☑ Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
☐ Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C) | ? |
{4}
K250591
Submitter
Momentis Surgical Ltd.
6 Yoni Netanyahu St.
Or Yehuda, Israel 6037604
Contact Person:
Maya Leib Shlomo, VP of QA/RA
Maya.leib@momentissurgical.com
Tel.: 972-5-088-52822
Date:
February 27, 2025
Device & Classification Name:
Anovo Surgical System Model 6Ne
21 CFR 878.4961 Mountable Electromechanical Surgical System for Transluminal Approaches, Class 2
Product Code:
QNM
Predicate Device:
Anovo Surgical System Model 6Ne K242157
Description:
The Anovo Surgical System is an endoscopic instrument control system that is intended to assist in the accurate control of the Instrument ARMS during single site, benign laparoscopic-assisted surgical procedures. The system consists of two (2) Anovo Instrument ARMS, Anovo Surgeon Console, Anovo Robotic Control Unit (RCU), and accessories (Anovo Pedestal, Anovo Access Kit and Anovo Sterile Drape for Robotic Control Unit).
The Instrument ARMS are connected to the RCU, which is attached to the Pedestal. The physician sits at the Anovo Surgeon Console and controls the Instrument ARMS by manipulating the ARMS Controllers. While manipulating the Instrument ARMS, the physician views the surgical site through a standard OR visualization system using a laparoscopic camera inserted through an abdominal port. The Anovo Surgical System Surgeon Console is located outside of the sterile zone
The Anovo Surgical System is a modification of the Anovo Surgical System Model 6Ne ("Predicate Device" K242157), including software update and Surgeon Console hardware modifications to support the use of an Off-the-Shelf FDA-cleared Endoscope Arm, SOLOASSIST II by AKTORmed (K233312) as an optional accessory (without the SOLOASSIST II hand-held joystick and Voice Control features). The Endoscope Arm can be connected to the Surgeon Console and controlled by the Surgeon through the ARMS Controllers. The annotation feature was removed, and the annotation pedal was replaced with the Endoscope control pedal. There are no differences in the system RCU, Instruments, and accessories.
Page 1 of 4
{5}
Page 2 of 4
# K250591
## Indications for Use:
The Anovo Surgical System is an endoscopic instrument control system that is intended to assist in the accurate control of the Instrument ARMS during single-site, natural orifice transvaginal benign laparoscopic-assisted surgical procedures listed below. The Anovo Surgical System is indicated for use in adult patients. It is intended to be used by trained physicians in an operating room environment.
The representative uses of the Anovo Surgical System are indicated for the following benign procedures:
- Total benign hysterectomy with salpingo-oophorectomy
- Total benign hysterectomy with salpingectomy
- Total benign hysterectomy
- Salpingectomy
- Oophorectomy
- Adnexectomy
- Ovarian cyst removal
## Comparison of Technological Characteristics:
The Anovo Surgical System Model 6Ne is based on the cleared Anovo Surgical System Model 6Ne ("predicate device" K242157) and, therefore, they are technologically similar.
The Software upgrade and Console Hardware modifications, including the removal of the annotation feature, are intended to support the use of an Off-the-Shelf Endoscope Arm as an accessory of the Anovo Surgical System. Both the subject and the predicate Anovo Surgical Systems are designed to be used in conjunction with a commercially available visualization system for laparoscopy used in the OR and operated by a non-sterile surgeon. The subject Anovo Surgical System allows the use of the Off-the-Shelf Endoscope Arm as an optional accessory to hold and manipulate the Endoscope by the surgeon through the Anovo Surgeon Console, instead of manually manipulating the Endoscope by the surgeon assistant.
## Performance Evaluation:
The following performance testing was conducted to demonstrate substantial equivalence to the predicate device:
### Bench Testing
Bench testing demonstrates that the subject device's design output meets the design input requirements. The testing conducted consisted of dimensional measurements and mechanical and functional verification.
### Software Testing
Software development process and software testing including verification and validation testing, were performed according to the current version of IEC 62304 and FDA's Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff "Content of Premarket Submissions for Device Software Functions".
### Cybersecurity
{6}
K250591
Anovo Surgical System 6Ne implements robust security controls to safeguard the integrity and security of the system's operation. Cybersecurity testing was performed, and the information provided in this submission demonstrates compliance with section 524B of the FD&C Act, consistent with current "FDA Guidance: Cybersecurity in Medical Devices - Quality System Considerations and Content of Premarket Submissions".
## Electrical Safety and Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC)
Electrical Safety and EMC testing was conducted using a third-party Accredited laboratory in accordance with the current versions of IEC 60601-1 (basic safety and essential performance), IEC 60601-1-6 (usability), IEC 80601-2-77 (basic safety and essential performance of robotically assisted surgical equipment), IEC 60601-1-2 (Electromagnetic disturbances), IEC 60601-4-2 (Electromagnetic Immunity), and IEC 60601-2-2 (high-frequency surgical equipment).
## Human Factors
Human Factors and Usability Engineering Process was performed according to the requirements of:
- ISO/IEC 62366-1:2015, Medical devices – Application of usability engineering to medical devices.
- Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff - Applying Human Factors and Usability Engineering to Medical Devices (February 3, 2016)
Representative US Surgeons evaluated the Anovo Surgical System model 6Ne interface with the Off-the-Shelf Endoscope Arm in a simulated OR environment by performing predefined critical tasks after a training session.
The Human Factor Usability Validation demonstrated that the Anovo Surgical System 6Ne used with Off-the-Shelf Endoscope Arm (SOLOASSIST II by AKTORmed) supports safe and effective use by representative users during the performance of transvaginal laparoscopic-assisted surgical procedures. The analysis of the results demonstrated that all relevant use-related risks were found to be acceptable and there is no residual use-related risk.
## Pre-Clinical Cadaver Study
Momentis has performed design validation in female cadaver models to ensure that the Anovo Surgical System 6Ne used with Off-the-Shelf Endoscope Arm meets its safety and performance requirements. The validation was performed by conducting procedures according to the system intended use in an operating room environment.
A female cadaver model was chosen for this study as it simulates the human anatomy and allows evaluation of system's ability to access and reach the relevant anatomical regions and structures during surgical procedures that are part of the Indications for Use.
Page 3 of 4
{7}
K250591
The results of the study demonstrated that the System can successfully perform all surgical tasks to complete transvaginal laparoscopic-assisted surgical procedures.
The Anovo Surgical System 6Ne met all the predefined specific requirements related to clinical compatibility, performance, and safety.
Conclusion:
The Anovo Surgical System Model 6Ne is substantially equivalent to the predicate device. The device has the same intended uses and indications for use as the predicate. The subject device has similar technological characteristics and principles of operation as the predicate device. The technological differences between the Anovo Surgical System 6Ne and its predicate device do not raise different questions of safety or effectiveness. Furthermore, the same type of non-clinical testing was performed to demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of the predicate device which also addressed the verification and validation of the subject device. No additional risks were identified in the completed testing. In addition, the subject device appropriately addresses all of the special controls in the existing classification regulation. Therefore, the Anovo Surgical System 6Ne is substantially equivalent to its predicate device.
Page 4 of 4
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.