The AdheResp Smart Breath-actuated Mesh Nebulizer is a system to aerosolize liquid medications for inhalation for patients ranging from pediatrics equal to or greater than 5 years old to adults who can coordinate breathing. The environment of use are Hospital/institutional settings, home care use, schools, and long-term care facilities
Device Story
Active vibrating mesh nebulizer; uses piezoelectric (PZT) ceramic element to vibrate mesh membrane; pushes liquid medication through fine conical holes to create aerosol. Features breath-actuation via pressure sensor; measures inhalation cycle to deliver aerosol during specific portion of breath (40%-80% range, default 60%). Includes main unit, medication reservoir, mouthpiece, and wireless connectivity. Used in hospitals, home care, schools, and long-term care facilities by patients or caregivers. Output is aerosolized medication for inhalation. Wireless connectivity allows data transmission. Breath-actuation improves delivery efficiency by timing aerosol release to inhalation cycle, potentially reducing medication waste and improving patient outcomes.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. Comparative aerosol performance testing conducted with 3 samples per device in triplicate using Albuterol, Ipratropium, and USP Cromolyn at 15 L/min and 30 L/min flow rates. Metrics included MMAD, GSD, Total Delivered Dose, Respirable Dose, Coarse Particle Dose, Fine Particle Dose, and Ultra-Fine Particle Dose. Results demonstrate performance similarity to predicate.
Technological Characteristics
Active vibrating mesh nebulizer; PZT ceramic element; rechargeable battery; wireless connectivity. Biocompatibility per ISO 10993-1 and ISO 18562. Multi-use reservoir chamber. Breath-actuation via pressure drop sensor.
Indications for Use
Indicated for patients ≥5 years old to adults capable of coordinating breathing for aerosolized liquid medication inhalation.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A nebulizer is a device intended to spray liquids in aerosol form into gases that are delivered directly to the patient for breathing. Heated, ultrasonic, gas, venturi, and refillable nebulizers are included in this generic type of device.
{0}
FDA U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION
June 20, 2025
HCmed Innovations Co., Ltd.
% Paul Dryden
Consultant
ProMedic Consulting LLC
131 Bay Point Drive NE
Saint Petersburg, Florida 33704
Re: K250583
Trade/Device Name: AdheResp Smart Breath-actuated Mesh Nebulizer
Regulation Number: 21 CFR 868.5630
Regulation Name: Nebulizer
Regulatory Class: Class II
Product Code: CAF
Dated: May 19, 2025
Received: May 19, 2025
Dear Paul Dryden:
We have reviewed your section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database available at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Additional information about changes that may require a new premarket notification are provided in the FDA guidance documents entitled "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Change to an Existing Device"
U.S. Food & Drug Administration
10903 New Hampshire Avenue
Silver Spring, MD 20993
www.fda.gov
{1}
K250583 - Paul Dryden
Page 2
(https://www.fda.gov/media/99812/download) and "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Software Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99785/download).
Your device is also subject to, among other requirements, the Quality System (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820), which includes, but is not limited to, 21 CFR 820.30, Design controls; 21 CFR 820.90, Nonconforming product; and 21 CFR 820.100, Corrective and preventive action. Please note that regardless of whether a change requires premarket review, the QS regulation requires device manufacturers to review and approve changes to device design and production (21 CFR 820.30 and 21 CFR 820.70) and document changes and approvals in the device master record (21 CFR 820.181).
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR Part 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reporting-combination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR Parts 1000-1050.
All medical devices, including Class I and unclassified devices and combination product device constituent parts are required to be in compliance with the final Unique Device Identification System rule ("UDI Rule"). The UDI Rule requires, among other things, that a device bear a unique device identifier (UDI) on its label and package (21 CFR 801.20(a)) unless an exception or alternative applies (21 CFR 801.20(b)) and that the dates on the device label be formatted in accordance with 21 CFR 801.18. The UDI Rule (21 CFR 830.300(a) and 830.320(b)) also requires that certain information be submitted to the Global Unique Device Identification Database (GUDID) (21 CFR Part 830 Subpart E). For additional information on these requirements, please see the UDI System webpage at https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance/unique-device-identification-system-udi-system.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reporting-mdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about medical devices and radiation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
{2}
K250583 - Paul Dryden
Page 3
Sincerely,
John S. Bender -S
2025.06.20 10:11:59 -04'00'
for Ethan Nyberg, Ph.D.
Assistant Director
DHT1C: Division of Anesthesia, Respiratory, and Sleep Devices
OHT1: Office of Ophthalmic, Anesthesia, Respiratory, ENT, and Dental Devices
Office of Product Evaluation and Quality
Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{3}
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
Indications for Use
Form Approved: OMB No. 0910-0120
Expiration Date: 07/31/2026
See PRA Statement below.
Submission Number (if known)
K250583
Device Name
AdheResp Smart Breath-actuated Mesh Nebulizer
Indications for Use (Describe)
The AdheResp Smart Breath-actuated Mesh Nebulizer is a system to aerosolize liquid medications for inhalation for patients ranging from pediatrics equal to or greater than 5 years old to adults who can coordinate breathing.
The environment of use are Hospital/institutional settings, home care use, schools, and long-term care facilities
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
☑ Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
☐ Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
## CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
*DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
Department of Health and Human Services
Food and Drug Administration
Office of Chief Information Officer
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff
PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov
> "An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{4}
K250583
# 510(k) Summary
Page 1 of 7
Date Prepared: 13-Jun-25
Sponsor: HCmed Innovations Co., Ltd.
Rm.B, 10F., No.319, Sec.2, Dunhua S. Rd.
TEL: +886-02-2732-6596
Sponsor Contact: Michelle Pieh
michelle@hcmed-inno.com
Submission Correspondent: Paul Dryden
ProMedic, LLC
Proprietary or Trade Name: AdheResp Smart Breath-actuated Mesh Nebulizer
Classification Name: Nebulizer
Product Code: CAF
Predicate Device: Pulmogine® Vibrating Mesh Nebulizer – K202171
Classification Name: Nebulizer
Product Code: CAF
Reference Device: Respironics AAD – K042991
Classification Name: Nebulizer
Product Code: CAF
Device Description: The AdheResp Smart Breath-actuated Mesh Nebulizer consists of a main unit, medication reservoir, mouthpiece, key tag and charging cable, or power adapter. The medication reservoir could be further separated into a medication container and an aerosol chamber.
Principle of Operation: There are two key features in the AdheResp Smart Breath-actuated Mesh Nebulizer, which are vibrating mesh nebulization and breath-actuation functions. The AdheResp Smart Breath-actuated Mesh Nebulizer is an active mesh nebulizer. Active mesh nebulizers operate by electrically activating a piezoelectric (PZT) ceramic element that rapidly contracts and expands when applied a voltage to it. The vibrations of the PZT are transmitted to the mesh membrane, which is in contact with the liquid medication loaded in the medication container. This vibration pushes the liquid or suspension through the fine conical holes of the mesh, forming aerosol droplets for the user to inhale.
Indications for Use: The AdheResp Smart Breath-actuated Mesh Nebulizer is a system to aerosolize liquid medications for inhalation for
{5}
K250583
# 510(k) Summary
Page 2 of 7
patients ranging from pediatrics equal to or greater than 5 years old to adults who can coordinate breathing. The environment of use are Hospital/institutional settings, home care use, schools, and long-term care facilities.
**Patient Population:**
Pediatrics equal to or greater than 5 years old to Adults who can coordinate breathing.
**Environments of use:**
Hospital/institutional settings, home care use, schools, and long-term care facilities.
{6}
K250583
510(k) Summary
Page 3 of 7
Comparison and Differences vs. Predicate and Reference
| | Subject Device
AdheResp
K250583 | Predicate Device
HcMed Pulmogine®
K202171 | Reference Device
Respironics AAD
K042991 | Comment |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Classification | 21 CFR 868.5630
CAF - Nebulizer - Direct patient interface | 21 CFR 868.5630
CAF - Nebulizer - Direct patient interface | 21 CFR 868.5630
CAF - Nebulizer - Direct patient interface | Similar |
| Indications for use | The AdheResp Smart Breath-actuated Mesh Nebulizer is a system to aerosolize liquid medications for inhalation for patients ranging from pediatrics equal to or greater than 5 years old to adults who can coordinate breathing.
The environment of use are Hospital/institutional settings, home care use, schools, and long-term care facilities. | The Pulmogine(r) Vibrating Mesh Nebulizer is a system designed to aerosolize liquid medications for inhalation by the patient. The device may be used with pediatric (5 years and older), defined by the prescribed medication, and adult patients in hospital / institutional settings, home care use, schools, and long-term care facilities. | The intended purpose of the I-neb AAD System is an ultrasonic (vibrating mesh) nebulizer system designed to aerosolize liquid medication approved for use with the 1-neb AAD System for inhalation by the patient in the home care, nursing home, sub-acute institution, or hospital environment. | Similar |
| Intended Use Environment | Hospital/institutional settings, home care use, schools, and long-term care facilities. | Hospital/institutional settings, home care use, schools, and long-term care facilities. | Home care, nursing home, sub-acute institution, or hospital environment | Similar |
| Principle of Operation | Vibrating Mesh | Vibrating Mesh | Vibrating Mesh | Similar |
| Aerosolization Mode | Breath actuated | Continuous only | Breath actuated | Similar to reference |
| Breath Actuation | Delivers aerosol during a portion of the inhalation cycle | Continuous only during whole inhalation cycle | Delivers aerosol during a portion of the inhalation cycle | Similar to reference |
{7}
K250583
510(k) Summary
Page 4 of 7
| | Subject Device
AdheResp
K250583 | Predicate Device
HcMed Pulmogine®
K202171 | Reference Device
Respironics AAD
K042991 | Comment |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Maximum Fill Volume | 8+ml | 10 ml | 6ml | Similar |
| Components | Main unit with rechargeable battery
Reservoir chamber – multi-use
Mouthpiece | Main unit with rechargeable battery
Reservoir chamber – multi-use
Mouthpiece | Main unit with rechargeable battery
Reservoir chamber – multi-use
Mouthpiece | Similar |
| Breath actuation | Pressure drop with sensor | Not applicable | Pressure drop with sensor | Similar to reference |
| Algorithm for Inhalation Aerosol delivery | Measures breath and averages the cycle, then delivers aerosol during the designated period | Not applicable | Measures breath and averages the cycle, then delivers aerosol during the designated period | Similar to reference |
| Aerosol delivery Range during Inhalation | 40%~80%
Default setting - 60%. | Not applicable | 50%~80%
Up to last 1 second of inhalation | Similar to reference |
| Nebulization rate | ≥0.25 ml/min | ≥0.25 ml/min | | Similar |
| Wireless connectivity | Yes | No | Yes | Similar to reference |
| Biocompatibility | Surface Contact, mucosal and Externally Communicating, Tissue contact, Permanent Duration
ISO 10993-1 testing
ISO 18562 testing | Surface Contact, mucosal and Externally Communicating, Tissue contact, Permanent Duration
ISO 10993-1 testing
ISO 18562 testing | Surface Contact, mucosal and Externally Communicating, Tissue contact, Permanent Duration
ISO 10993-1 testing
ISO 18562 testing | Similar |
{8}
K250583
510(k) Summary
Page 5 of 7
Breathe Actuated Particle Characterization Performance Comparison to Predicate
| Comparative Performance Testing – Breath Actuated 15 LPM and 30 LPM | | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | Subject Device 15 LPM | Predicate 15 LPM | Subject Device 30 LPM | Predicate 30 LPM |
| MMAD [μm] | Albuterol | 3.98 ±0.18 | 4.52 ±0.21 | 3.48 ±0.15 | 3.93 ±0.41 |
| | Ipratropium | 3.984 ±0.11 | 4.29 ±0.17 | 3.39 ±0.21 | 3.66 ±0.18 |
| | USP Cromolyn | 4.07 ±0.14 | 4.46 ±0.29 | 3.58 ±0.15 | 3.77 ±0.35 |
| GSD | Albuterol | 1.82 ±0.03 | 2.01 ±0.12 | 1.89 ±0.09 | 1.93 ±0.18 |
| | Ipratropium | 1.94 ±0.10 | 2.15 ±0.14 | 1.98 ±0.16 | 2.09 ±0.11 |
| | USP Cromolyn | 1.88 ±0.02 | 2.15 ±0.08 | 1.90 ±0.07 | 2.04 ±0.08 |
| Total Delivered Dose (mg) | Albuterol | 4.25 ±0.36 | 4.06 ±0.42 | 3.83 ±0.29 | 3.78 ±0.29 |
| | Ipratropium | 0.45 ±0.07 | 0.45 ±0.08 | 0.40 ±0.04 | 0.40 ±0.06 |
| | USP Cromolyn | 16.23 ±1.35 | 14.73 ±2.24 | 14.65 ±1.09 | 13.69 ±1.75 |
| Respirable Dose <5μm [mg] | Albuterol | 2.71 ±0.32 | 2.16 ±0.21 | 2.67 ±0.21 | 2.33 ±0.39 |
| | Ipratropium | 0.28 ±0.03 | 0.24 ±0.04 | 0.27 ±0.03 | 0.24 ±0.03 |
| | USP Cromolyn | 10 ±0.85 | 7.7 ±1.08 | 9.95 ±0.71 | 8.42 ±0.52 |
| Coarse Particle Dose <4.7μm [mg] | Albuterol | 1.47 ±0.10 | 1.56 ±0.19 | 1.05 ±0.28 | 1.20 ±0.39 |
| | Ipratropium | 0.15 ±0.02 | 0.16 ±0.02 | 0.11 ±0.01 | 0.12 ±0.02 |
| | USP Cromolyn | 5.85 ±0.65 | 5.51 ±0.09 | 4.55 ±0.72 | 4,57 ±1.12 |
| Fine Particle Dose <4.7μm [mg] | Albuterol | 2.56 ±0.30 | 2.01 ±0.19 | 2.54 ±0.21 | 2.16 ±0.21 |
| | Ipratropium | 0.27 ±0.03 | 0.23 ±0.04 | 0.26 ±0.03 | 0.23 ±0.03 |
| | USP Cromolyn | 9.41 ±0.65 | 7.35 ±0609 | 9.46 ±0.48 | 8.00 ±0.47 |
| Ultra-Fine Particle Dose <1μm [mg] | Albuterol | LOD | LOD | 0.21 ±0.06 | 0.20 ±0.04 |
| | Ipratropium | 0.01 ±0.00 | 0.01 ±0.00 | 0.02 ±0.01 | 0.03 ±0.01 |
| | USP Cromolyn | LOD | LOD | 0.58 ±0.05 | 0.58 ±0.11 |
Testing was performed with 3 samples of each device in triplicate with the 3 drugs. Testing was performed at flow rates of 15 L/min and 30 L/min. The above comparative results and performance are similar for both the proposed device and the predicate.
{9}
K250583
510(k) Summary
Page 6 of 7
# Substantial Equivalence Discussion
## Substantial Equivalence Discussion
The tables above compare the key features of the subject device with the identified predicate and reference. The comparison demonstrates that the subject device can be found to be substantially equivalent to the predicate and any differences are addressed with the reference device.
## Indications for Use –
The indications for use are similar for the subject device when compared to the predicate.
## Technology and construction –
The technology and principle of operation is similar for the subject device when compared to the predicate and reference devices.
## Environment of Use –
The environments of use are similar to the predicate device.
## Patient Population –
The patient population is similar to the predicate device.
# Non-Clinical Testing Summary –
## Bench testing
Performance testing demonstrated that the subject device met its acceptance criteria. Testing included:
- Nebulization rate
- Inter- and Intra-sample Variability
- Aerosol Performance
- Comparative (Subject vs. Predicate) Aerosol Performance
- Minimum Breath Actuation Tests
## Biocompatibility
Applicable ISO 10993 and ISO 18652 testing was performed.
## Reprocessing, Sterility, and Shelf-Life
- Cleaning Validation
- Aging
- Simulated Life (cleaning, aging, drop)
## Discussion of Differences
The subject device differs in the following ways from the predicate:
- The predicate device is not breath actuated
{10}
K250583
510(k) Summary Page 7 of 7
- It does not include wireless connectivity
- These have been addressed by use of a reference device
## Discussion of Differences
The differences between the subject and predicate and reference devices do not raise new concerns regarding the safety and effectiveness as demonstrated by performance testing.
## Substantial Equivalence Conclusion
The sponsor has demonstrated through performance testing, design and non-clinical testing that the subject device and predicate have been found to be substantially equivalent.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.