K250375 · Waldemar Link GmbH & Co. KG · MEH · Nov 5, 2025 · Orthopedic
Device Facts
Record ID
K250375
Device Name
Allure Hip Stem and Intramedullary Plugs
Applicant
Waldemar Link GmbH & Co. KG
Product Code
MEH · Orthopedic
Decision Date
Nov 5, 2025
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 888.3353
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic
Indications for Use
The Allure Hip Stems are intended to be used in total and partial (hemi-) hip arthroplasty to treat mobility-limiting diseases, fractures or defects of the hip joint or proximal femur which cannot be treated by conservative or osteosynthetic procedures. The Allure Hip Stems are intended for uncemented use only. The Intramedullary Plugs are intended for use with cemented hip stem prostheses to prevent uncontrolled diffusion of bone cement within the medullary canal.
Device Story
Allure Hip Stem and Intramedullary Plugs are orthopedic implants for hip arthroplasty. Hip stems are forged Ti6Al4V alloy with TiCaP proximal coating and HX-coated distal tip; designed for uncemented fixation in total or hemi-hip procedures. Intramedullary plugs are UHMWPE components used with cemented hip stems to restrict bone cement flow in the medullary canal. Devices are implanted by orthopedic surgeons in clinical/OR settings. Stems are combined with previously cleared prosthesis heads and acetabular cups to restore hip joint function. Clinical benefit includes treatment of mobility-limiting hip disease and fractures. Substantial equivalence established via non-clinical bench testing and engineering analysis; no new safety/effectiveness questions raised.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical trials were required for the hip stems. Clinical evidence from OUS (Outside United States) use was provided for the Intramedullary Plug to support safety and effectiveness. Bench testing included ISO 7206-4/6 fatigue testing, ISO 21535 ROM evaluation, fretting/impingement analysis, coating characterization, and ISO 10993 biocompatibility.
Technological Characteristics
Hip stems: Ti6Al4V alloy (forged), TiCaP (Titanium-plasma + Calcium Phosphate) proximal coating, HX (Calcium Phosphate) distal coating. Intramedullary plugs: UHMWPE. Dimensions: Plugs 8-20 mm. Standards: ISO 7206-4/6 (fatigue), ISO 21535 (ROM), ISO 10993 (biocompatibility), ASTM D4169 (packaging). Mechanical fixation (uncemented stems).
Indications for Use
Indicated for patients requiring total or partial hip arthroplasty due to primary/secondary osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, functional deformities, avascular necrosis, femoral neck fractures, or revision surgeries. Intramedullary plugs indicated for use with cemented hip stems to prevent bone cement diffusion.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A hip joint metal/ceramic/polymer semi-constrained cemented or nonporous uncemented prosthesis is a device intended to be implanted to replace a hip joint. This device limits translation and rotation in one or more planes via the geometry of its articulating surfaces. It has no linkage across-the-joint. The two-part femoral component consists of a femoral stem made of alloys to be fixed in the intramedullary canal of the femur by impaction with or without use of bone cement. The proximal end of the femoral stem is tapered with a surface that ensures positive locking with the spherical ceramic (aluminium oxide, A12 03 ) head of the femoral component. The acetabular component is made of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene or ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene reinforced with nonporous metal alloys, and used with or without bone cement.
Stryker Orthopaedics, Insignia Hip Stem (K211703, K220731)
United Orthopedic Corp. Cement Restrictor (K152530)
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}
FDA U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION
November 5, 2025
Waldemar Link GmbH & Co. KG
% Terry Powell
V. P. Regulatory Affairs
LinkBio Corp.
69 King Street
Dover, New Jersey 07801
Re: K250375
Trade/Device Name: Allure Hip Stem and Intramedullary Plugs
Regulation Number: 21 CFR 888.3353
Regulation Name: Hip Joint Metal/Ceramic/Polymer Semi-Constrained Cemented Or Nonporous Uncemented Prosthesis
Regulatory Class: Class II
Product Code: MEH, LZO, LPH, OQG, KWY
Dated: September 26, 2025
Received: September 26, 2025
Dear Terry Powell:
We have reviewed your section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database available at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
U.S. Food & Drug Administration
10903 New Hampshire Avenue
Silver Spring, MD 20993
www.fda.gov
{1}
K250375 - Terry Powell
Page 2
Additional information about changes that may require a new premarket notification are provided in the FDA guidance documents entitled "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99812/download) and "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Software Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99785/download).
Your device is also subject to, among other requirements, the Quality System (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820), which includes, but is not limited to, 21 CFR 820.30, Design controls; 21 CFR 820.90, Nonconforming product; and 21 CFR 820.100, Corrective and preventive action. Please note that regardless of whether a change requires premarket review, the QS regulation requires device manufacturers to review and approve changes to device design and production (21 CFR 820.30 and 21 CFR 820.70) and document changes and approvals in the device master record (21 CFR 820.181).
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR Part 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reporting-combination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR Parts 1000-1050.
All medical devices, including Class I and unclassified devices and combination product device constituent parts are required to be in compliance with the final Unique Device Identification System rule ("UDI Rule"). The UDI Rule requires, among other things, that a device bear a unique device identifier (UDI) on its label and package (21 CFR 801.20(a)) unless an exception or alternative applies (21 CFR 801.20(b)) and that the dates on the device label be formatted in accordance with 21 CFR 801.18. The UDI Rule (21 CFR 830.300(a) and 830.320(b)) also requires that certain information be submitted to the Global Unique Device Identification Database (GUDID) (21 CFR Part 830 Subpart E). For additional information on these requirements, please see the UDI System webpage at https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance/unique-device-identification-system-udi-system.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reporting-mdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about medical devices and radiation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-
{2}
K250375 - Terry Powell
Page 3
assistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
# Limin Sun -S
Limin Sun, Ph.D.
Assistant Director
DHT6A: Division of Joint Arthroplasty Devices
OHT6: Office of Orthopedic Devices
Office of Product Evaluation and Quality
Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{3}
FORM FDA 3881 (6/20)
Page 1 of 1
PSC Publishing Services (301) 443-6740
EF
| DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Food and Drug Administration Indications for Use | Form Approved: OMB No. 0910-0120 Expiration Date: 06/30/2023 See PRA Statement below. |
| --- | --- |
| 510(k) Number (if known) K250375 | |
| Device Name Allure Hip Stem and Intramedullary Plugs | |
| Indications for Use (Describe) The Allure Hip Stems are intended to be used in total and partial (hemi-) hip arthroplasty to treat mobility-limiting diseases, fractures or defects of the hip joint or proximal femur which cannot be treated by conservative or osteosynthetic procedures. The Allure Hip Stems are intended for uncemented use only. | |
| Indications: - Primary and secondary osteoarthritis - Rheumatoid arthritis - Correction of functional deformities - Avascular necrosis - Femoral neck fractures - Revision surgeries | |
| The Intramedullary Plugs are intended for use with cemented hip stem prostheses to prevent uncontrolled diffusion of bone cement within the medullary canal. | |
| Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable) ☑ Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) ☐ Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C) | |
| CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED. | |
| This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.* | |
| The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to: Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov | |
| "An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number." | |
{4}
K250375 Page 1 of 3
510(k) Summary
| 510(k) Submitter: | Waldemar Link GmbH & Co. KG
Barkhausenweg 10
22339 Hamburg, Germany
Phone: +49-40-539950
Facility Registration: 3003386935 |
| --- | --- |
| Contact Person: | Waldemar Link GmbH & Co. KG
Pia Müller (Regulatory Affairs)
Oststraße 4-10
22844 Norderstedt, Germany
Phone: +49-40 53995-841
Fax: +49-40 53995-174
E-Mail: p.mueller@link-ortho.com |
| Date Prepared: | November 4, 2025 |
| Trade Name: | Allure Hip Stem and Intramedullary Plugs |
| Common Name: | Total hip replacement system |
| Classification Name: | Hip joint metal/ceramic/polymer semi-constrained cemented or nonporous uncemented prosthesis. 21 CFR §888.3353, product codes MEH, LZO
Hip joint metal/polymer/metal semi-constrained porous-coated uncemented prosthesis. 21 CFR §888.3358, product codes LPH, OQG
Hip joint femoral (hemi-hip) metal/polymer cemented or uncemented prosthesis. 21 CFR §888.3390, product code KWY |
| Classification and Panel: | Class II, Orthopedic / 87 |
| Predicate Devices: | See table below. |
| Subject Device Components | Predicate Devices | 510(k) Number |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Allure Hip Stem | 1. DePuy Orthopaedics, Actis DuoFix Hip Prosthesis [Primary Predicate] | K150862, K160907, K210581 |
| | 2. Stryker Orthopaedics, Insignia Hip Stem [Additional Predicate] | K211703, K220731 |
| Intramedullary Plugs | 1. United Orthopedic Corp. Cement Restrictor [Additional Predicate] | K152530 |
Reason for Submission: New Device System Components
{5}
K250375 Page 2 of 3
## Device Description:
This submission includes the Allure Hip Stems for cementless use and Intramedullary (IM) Plugs for use with cemented hip stem prostheses. Therefore, they are not meant to be used together, but the Allure Stems and the IM Plugs (when used with LINK cemented hip stems) are both used with the same previously cleared LINK systems (Prosthesis Heads and Vario Cups, BiMobile Dual Mobility System, MobileLink Acetabular Cup System) to create hemi-hip or total hip arthroplasty constructs.
The Allure Hip Stem is forged out of a Tilastan-S (Ti6Al4V) alloy. The Prosthesis Stems are proximally equipped with a TiCaP (Titanium-plasma + Calcium Phosphate) coating while the distal tip features a microporous surface with a HX (Calcium Phosphate) coating. The implants are available in different sizes and neck designs, standard or lateralized version and collared or collarless neck, allowing an accurate anatomical match for each patient.
The Allure Hip Stem is part of a mechanical reconstruction of the hip joint. The Allure Hip Stem forms a total hip arthroplasty (THA) when combined with a prosthesis head and an acetabular cup. Alternatively, a hemiarthroplasty (HA) is formed, when combined with the Vario-Cup System. The Hip Stem is intended for uncemented use.
The Intramedullary Plugs are used in combination with cemented implant components.
The Intramedullary Plugs are manufactured from ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE), and in sizes from 8 mm to 20 mm.
## Indications for Use:
The Allure Hip Stems are intended to be used in total and partial (hemi-) hip arthroplasty to treat mobility-limiting diseases, fractures or defects of the hip joint or proximal femur which cannot be treated by conservative or osteosynthetic procedures. The Allure Hip Stems are intended for uncemented use only.
**Indications:**
- Primary and secondary osteoarthritis
- Rheumatoid arthritis
- Correction of functional deformities
- Avascular necrosis
- Femoral neck fractures
- Revision surgeries
The Intramedullary Plugs are intended for use with cemented hip stem prostheses to prevent uncontrolled diffusion of bone cement within the medullary canal.
## Comparison to Predicate Device:
The Allure Hip Stem is substantially equivalent to the predicate stems in that all have similar indications, design, geometry, coating, materials and mechanical safety. The subject device and primary predicate differ with regard to their proximal Titanium coatings (the primary predicate stem uses sintered titanium beads, while the subject stem uses plasma-sprayed titanium). Titanium plasma spray is a common process for titanium coatings on orthopedic implants and is also featured on the additional predicate stem. All devices are intended for uncemented use only.
{6}
K250375 Page 3 of 3
The subject Intramedullary (IM) Plugs and additional predicate cement restrictor device are made from the same material and have similar designs. They are used for implantation of cemented prostheses to avoid uncontrolled diffusion of the cement within the intramedullary canal.
Non-Clinical Performance:
Non-clinical performance testing and analysis were provided, including:
- Distal stem fatigue testing per ISO 7206-4
- Stem neck fatigue testing per ISO 7206-6
- Range of Motion (ROM) evaluation per ISO 21535
- Engineering analysis of fretting corrosion performance
- Engineering analysis of impingement performance
- Coating Characterization
- Intramedullary (IM) Plug verification testing
- Biocompatibility evaluation per ISO 10993
- Sterilization testing (packaging simulation) per ASTM D4169
The results of non-clinical performance testing demonstrate that the devices are as safe and effective as the predicate devices, and therefore Substantially Equivalent.
Clinical Performance:
Clinical performance testing was not required to demonstrate the substantial equivalence of this device.
- Clinical Evidence
- Clinical evidence of the subject Intramedullary (IM) Plug from outside United States (OUS) use has been provided to support its safety and effectiveness.
Conclusion:
The subject devices are substantially equivalent to the predicate devices identified in this premarket notification. Technological differences between the subject and predicate devices do not raise new questions of safety or effectiveness, and established non-clinical testing and evaluation methods provide assurance of substantially equivalent performance characteristics.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.