MoMe ARC® Wireless Ambulatory ECG Monitoring and Detection System (32000)
Applicant
Infobionic, Inc.
Product Code
DSI · Cardiovascular
Decision Date
Jul 29, 2025
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 870.1025
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Pediatric
Indications for Use
MoMe ARC® is indicated for: 1. Patients who experience transient symptoms that may suggest cardiac arrhythmia. 2. Patients who require monitoring of effect of drugs to control ventricular rate in various atrial arrhythmias (e.g. atrial fibrillation) 3. Patients with symptoms that may be due to cardiac arrhythmias. These may include but are not limited to symptoms such as: a) dizziness or lightheadedness; b) syncope of unknown etiology in which arrhythmias are suspected or need to be excluded; and c) dyspnea (shortness of breath) 4. Patients recovering from cardiac surgery or interventional procedures who are indicated for outpatient arrhythmia monitoring. 5. ECG data recorded by the device can be analyzed by other processing systems to provide Holter style reports. MoMe ARC® is contraindicated for: 1. MoMe ARC® is contraindicated for those patients requiring attended, in hospital monitoring for life threatening arrhythmias. 2. MoMe ARC® is not intended for use on infants weighing less than 10kg (22lbs.). Clinical judgement is necessary to determine if the MoMe ARC® is appropriate for specific pediatric patients. 3. The patch configuration of the MoMe ARC® is contraindicated for monitoring QT intervals for patients taking Class III antiarrhythmic drugs. Note: MoMe ARC® does not provide interpretive statements. Interpretation and diagnosis is the responsibility of a physician.
Device Story
MoMe ARC® is a wireless ambulatory ECG monitoring system consisting of a body-worn Sensor Pod, leads/patch, and a Gateway (mobile device running an app). The system acquires ECG signals and transmits them via 2.4GHz BLE to the Gateway, which forwards data via cellular link to the MoMe Software Platform. The platform uses proprietary algorithms to analyze ECG data and flag abnormal rhythms for physician review. Used in clinics or home environments, the device operates autonomously but includes an optional patient-triggered event feature. Physicians access the platform to review flagged data and patient symptoms to aid in diagnosing cardiac arrhythmias. The device provides no automated diagnostic interpretations; it supports clinical decision-making by providing continuous ECG monitoring data.
Clinical Evidence
Prospective clinical study of 87 adult subjects (75 inpatient, 12 outpatient). Data adjudicated by Certified Cardiac Technicians (CCTs) using Holter software as reference. Primary endpoints: sensitivity and positive predictivity (+P) for arrhythmia detection per ANSI/AMI/IEC EC57:2012. Results: Sensitivity and +P met predefined acceptance criteria; heart-rate accuracy showed mean absolute error of ± 0.247 bpm. No adverse events reported.
Technological Characteristics
Materials: Polycarbonate, polyolefin foam tape, spunlace nonwoven tape, hydrogel, TPV, TPE. Sensing: ECG electrodes/patch. Energy: Rechargeable Li-ion battery. Connectivity: 2.4GHz BLE (sensor to gateway), 4G cellular (gateway to cloud). Form factor: Body-worn sensor pod. Sterilization: Non-sterile. Software: Proprietary server-side algorithm for arrhythmia detection.
Indications for Use
Indicated for patients >10kg experiencing transient symptoms suggesting cardiac arrhythmia, requiring monitoring of drug effects on ventricular rate in atrial arrhythmias, or recovering from cardiac surgery/interventional procedures. Contraindicated for patients requiring attended in-hospital monitoring for life-threatening arrhythmias, infants <10kg, and patch-based QT monitoring for patients on Class III antiarrhythmic drugs.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
The arrhythmia detector and alarm device monitors an electrocardiogram and is designed to produce a visible or audible signal or alarm when atrial or ventricular arrhythmia, such as premature contraction or ventricular fibrillation, occurs.
Special Controls
*Classification.* Class II (special controls). The guidance document entitled “Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Arrhythmia Detector and Alarm” will serve as the special control. See § 870.1 for the availability of this guidance document.
Predicate Devices
MoMe® ARC Wireless Ambulatory ECG Monitoring and Detection System (K230265)
Reference Devices
Braemar Telemetry Patch System Model BTPS-1000 (K153473)
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}
FDA U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION
July 29, 2025
InfoBionic, Inc.
% Rita King
CEO
MethodSense, Inc.
1 Copley Pkwy
Suite 130
Morrisville, North Carolina 27560
Re: K250356
Trade/Device Name: MoMe ARC® Wireless Ambulatory ECG Monitoring and Detection System (32000)
Regulation Number: 21 CFR 870.1025
Regulation Name: Arrhythmia Detector And Alarm (Including ST-Segment Measurement And Alarm)
Regulatory Class: Class II
Product Code: DSI
Dated: July 1, 2025
Received: July 1, 2025
Dear Rita King:
We have reviewed your section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database available at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
U.S. Food & Drug Administration
10903 New Hampshire Avenue
Silver Spring, MD 20993
www.fda.gov
{1}
K250356 - Rita King
Page 2
Additional information about changes that may require a new premarket notification are provided in the FDA guidance documents entitled "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99812/download) and "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Software Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99785/download).
Your device is also subject to, among other requirements, the Quality System (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820), which includes, but is not limited to, 21 CFR 820.30, Design controls; 21 CFR 820.90, Nonconforming product; and 21 CFR 820.100, Corrective and preventive action. Please note that regardless of whether a change requires premarket review, the QS regulation requires device manufacturers to review and approve changes to device design and production (21 CFR 820.30 and 21 CFR 820.70) and document changes and approvals in the device master record (21 CFR 820.181).
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR Part 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reporting-combination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR Parts 1000-1050.
All medical devices, including Class I and unclassified devices and combination product device constituent parts are required to be in compliance with the final Unique Device Identification System rule ("UDI Rule"). The UDI Rule requires, among other things, that a device bear a unique device identifier (UDI) on its label and package (21 CFR 801.20(a)) unless an exception or alternative applies (21 CFR 801.20(b)) and that the dates on the device label be formatted in accordance with 21 CFR 801.18. The UDI Rule (21 CFR 830.300(a) and 830.320(b)) also requires that certain information be submitted to the Global Unique Device Identification Database (GUDID) (21 CFR Part 830 Subpart E). For additional information on these requirements, please see the UDI System webpage at https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance/unique-device-identification-system-udi-system.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reporting-mdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about medical devices and radiation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-
{2}
K250356 - Rita King
Page 3
assistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
JENNIFER W. SHIH -S
Jennifer Kozen
Assistant Director
Division of Cardiac Electrophysiology,
Diagnostics, and Monitoring Devices
Office of Cardiovascular Devices
Office of Product Evaluation and Quality
Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{3}
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
Indications for Use
Form Approved: OMB No. 0910-0120
Expiration Date: 07/31/2026
See PRA Statement below.
Submission Number (if known)
K250356
Device Name
MoMe ARC® Wireless Ambulatory ECG Monitoring and Detection System (32000)
Indications for Use (Describe)
MoMe ARC® is indicated for:
1. Patients who experience transient symptoms that may suggest cardiac arrhythmia.
2. Patients who require monitoring of effect of drugs to control ventricular rate in various atrial arrhythmias (e.g. atrial fibrillation)
3. Patients with symptoms that may be due to cardiac arrhythmias. These may include but are not limited to symptoms such as: a) dizziness or lightheadedness; b) syncope of unknown etiology in which arrhythmias are suspected or need to be excluded; and c) dyspnea (shortness of breath)
4. Patients recovering from cardiac surgery or interventional procedures who are indicated for outpatient arrhythmia monitoring.
5. ECG data recorded by the device can be analyzed by other processing systems to provide Holter style reports.
MoMe ARC® is contraindicated for:
1. MoMe ARC® is contraindicated for those patients requiring attended, in hospital monitoring for life threatening arrhythmias.
2. MoMe ARC® is not intended for use on infants weighing less than 10kg (22lbs.). Clinical judgement is necessary to determine if the MoMe ARC® is appropriate for specific pediatric patients.
3. The patch configuration of the MoMe ARC® is contraindicated for monitoring QT intervals for patients taking Class III antiarrhythmic drugs.
Note: MoMe ARC® does not provide interpretive statements. Interpretation and diagnosis is the responsibility of a physician.
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
☑ Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
☐ Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
## CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
*DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
Department of Health and Human Services
Food and Drug Administration
Office of Chief Information Officer
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff
PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{4}
K250356
510(k) Premarket Notification:
MoMe ARC® Wireless Ambulatory ECG
Monitoring and Detection System
INFOBIONIC
# Summary of 510(k)
# InfoBionic K250356
This 510(k) Summary is in conformance with 21CFR 807.92
| Submitter: | InfoBionic, Inc. |
| --- | --- |
| | 312 Billerica Rd. Office Link #5 |
| | Chelmsford, MA 02184 |
| | Phone: 1-978-674-8304 |
| | Fax: 1-888-447-4593 |
| Primary Contact: | Rita King, CEO MethodSense, Inc. Email: ritaking@methodsense.com Phone: 919-313-3961 Fax: 919-313-3979 |
| --- | --- |
| Company Contact: | Laura Leal |
| --- | --- |
| | Quality and Regulatory, Sr. Director |
| | Email: lleal@infobionic.com |
| | Phone: 1-707-694-4905 |
Date Prepared: June 30, 2025
# Device Name and Classification
| Trade Name: | MoMe ARC® Wireless Ambulatory ECG Monitoring and Detection System |
| --- | --- |
| Common Name: | Continuous ECG Monitor and Arrhythmia Detection |
| Classification: | Class II |
| Regulation Number: | 21 CFR Part 870.1025 |
| Classification Panel: | Cardiovascular |
| Product Code: | DSI |
Predicate Device:
| | Predicate Device | Reference Device |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Trade Name | MoMe® ARC Wireless Ambulatory ECG Monitoring and Detection System | Braemar Telemetry Patch System Model BTPS-1000 |
| Common Name | Continuous ECG monitor and Arrhythmia Detection | Arrhythmia detector and alarm |
| 510(k) Submitter / Holder | InfoBionic, Inc. | Braemar Manufacturing, LLC |
| 510(k) Number | K230265 | K153473 |
| Regulation Number | 21 CFR Part 870.1025 | 21 CFR Part 870.1025 |
| Classification Panel | Cardiovascular | Cardiovascular |
| Product Code | DSI | DSI |
The predicate and reference devices have not been subject to design-related recalls.
InfoBionic MoMe ARC® Traditional 510(k) K250356
{5}
K250356
510(k) Premarket Notification: MoMe ARC® Wireless Ambulatory ECG Monitoring and Detection System
# Device Description
The MoMe ARC® device consists of a Sensor Pod, Leads, Gateway, and Charging Cradle with accessories. The body worn Sensor Pod acquires, stores and forwards electrocardiogram (ECG) data from Leads in a Wired Lead-Set or in a Patch to the Gateway using a 2.4GHz BLE wireless link. The Gateway consists of an OTS mobile device running the MoMe ARC® Gateway Mobile App. The Gateway is a Medical Device Data System (MDDS) which stores and forwards the ECG signal data to the MoMe Software Platform (K152491) via a wireless cellular link.
The MoMe ARC® communicates with the MoMe Software Platform (K152491), a web-based remote server software with proprietary algorithms for analysis, using the MoMe Device Communications Protocol. The MoMe Software System (K152491) analyzes the data via the embedded algorithm and, when indicated, data identified by the algorithm is flagged for physician review.
Once activated and operating normally, the system requires no patient intervention to capture or analyze data. However, the MoMe ARC® has an optional patient triggered event feature that allows for manual selection and recording of patient symptoms, if and when desired.
The device is intended for use under prescription only (Rx only) for monitoring patients with suspected cardiac arrhythmias.
# The MoMe ARC®:
- Is non-invasive and poses no significant safety issues;
- Uses existing electrode and patch ECG technology; and
- Is used in an adjunctive fashion, where physicians also use patient symptoms and other tests, in the diagnosis or monitoring of patients with suspected cardiac arrhythmias.
MoMe ARC® is not an emergency service. If the patient is experiencing symptoms that he/she is concerned about, the patient needs to seek immediate medical attention.
# Indications for Use
MoMe ARC® is indicated for:
1. Patients who experience transient symptoms that may suggest cardiac arrhythmia.
2. Patients who require monitoring of effect of drugs to control ventricular rate in various atrial arrhythmias (e.g. atrial fibrillation)
3. Patients with symptoms that may be due to cardiac arrhythmias. These may include but are not limited to symptoms such as: a) dizziness or lightheadedness; b) syncope of unknown etiology in which arrhythmias are suspected or need to be excluded; and c) dyspnea (shortness of breath)
4. Patients recovering from cardiac surgery or interventional procedures who are indicated for outpatient arrhythmia monitoring.
5. ECG data recorded by the device can be analyzed by other processing systems to provide Holter style reports.
MoMe ARC® is contraindicated for:
1. MoMe ARC® is contraindicated for those patients requiring attended, in hospital monitoring for life threatening arrhythmias.
InfoBionic MoMe ARC® Traditional 510(k) K250356
{6}
K250356
510(k) Premarket Notification: MoMe ARC® Wireless Ambulatory ECG Monitoring and Detection System
2. MoMe ARC® is not intended for use on infants weighing less than 10kg (22lbs.). Clinical judgement is necessary to determine if the MoMe ARC® is appropriate for specific pediatric patients.
3. The patch configuration of the MoMe ARC® is contraindicated for monitoring QT intervals for patients taking Class III antiarrhythmic drugs.
Note: MoMe ARC® does not provide interpretive statements. Interpretation and diagnosis is the responsibility of a physician.
InfoBionic MoMe ARC® Traditional 510(k) K250356
Page 3 of 11
{7}
K250356
infoBionic MoMe ARC® Traditional 510(k) K250356
# 510(k) Premarket Notification:
MoMe ARC® Wireless Ambulatory ECG
Monitoring and Detection System
## Substantial Equivalence
The table below provides a detailed comparison of MoMe ARC® to the predicate and reference devices.
| Characteristic | Subject Device MoMe ARC® | Predicate Device MoMe ARC® (K230265) | Reference Device Braemar Telemetry Patch System, Model BTPS-1000 (K153473) | Comparison |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Intended Use | | | | |
| Intended Use | For ECG reporting and arrhythmia detection in patients with non-life threatening arrhythmias | For ECG reporting and arrhythmia detection in patients with non-life threatening arrhythmias | For ECG reporting and arrhythmia detection in patients with non-life threatening arrhythmias | Identical |
| Indications for Use | | | | |
| Indications for Use | MoMe ARC® is indicated for:
1. Patients who experience transient symptoms that may suggest cardiac arrhythmia.
2. Patients who require monitoring of effect of drugs to control ventricular rate in various atrial arrhythmias (e.g. atrial fibrillation)
3. Patients with symptoms that may be due to cardiac arrhythmias. These may include but are not limited to symptoms such as: a) dizziness or lightheadedness; b) syncope of unknown etiology in which arrhythmias are suspected or need to be excluded; and c) dyspnea (shortness of breath)
4. Patients recovering from cardiac surgery or interventional procedures who are indicated for | MoMe ARC® is indicated for:
1. Patients who experience transient symptoms that may suggest cardiac arrhythmia.
2. Patients who require monitoring of effect of drugs to control ventricular rate in various atrial arrhythmias (e.g. atrial fibrillation)
3. Patients with symptoms that may be due to cardiac arrhythmias. These may include but are not limited to symptoms such as: a) dizziness or lightheadedness; b) syncope of unknown etiology in which arrhythmias are suspected or need to be excluded; and c) dyspnea (shortness of breath)
4. Patients recovering from cardiac surgery or interventional procedures who are indicated for | The device is designated as Rx only. Its indications for use are as follows:
1. Patients who have a demonstrated need for cardiac monitoring. These may include but are not limited to patients who require monitoring for: a) non-life threatening arrhythmias such as supraventricular tachycardias (e.g. atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter, PACs, PSVT) and ventricular ectopy; b) evaluation of bradyarrhythmias and intermittent bundle branch block, including after cardiovascular surgery and myocardial infarction; and c) arrhythmias associated with co-morbid conditions such as hyperthyroidism or chronic lung disease. | Equivalent to the predicate. |
InfoBionic MoMe ARC® Traditional 510(k) K250356
Page 4 of 11
{8}
K250356
INFOBIONIC
510(k) Premarket Notification:
MoMe ARC® Wireless Ambulatory ECG
Monitoring and Detection System
| | outpatient arrhythmia monitoring.
5. ECG data recorded by the device can be analyzed by other processing systems to provide Holter style reports.
MoMe ARC® is contraindicated for:
1. MoMe ARC® is contraindicated for those patients requiring attended, in hospital monitoring for life threatening arrhythmias.
2. MoMe ARC® is not intended for use on infants weighing less than 10kg (22lbs.). Clinical judgement is necessary to determine if the MoMe ARC® is appropriate for specific pediatric patients.
3. The patch configuration of the MoMe ARC® is contraindicated for monitoring QT intervals for patients taking Class III anti arrhythmic drugs.
Note: MoMe ARC® does not provide interpretive statements. Interpretation and diagnosis is the responsibility of a physician. | outpatient arrhythmia monitoring.
5. ECG data recorded by the device can be analyzed by other processing systems to provide Holter style reports.
MoMe ARC® is contraindicated for:
1. MoMe ARC® is contraindicated for those patients requiring attended, in hospital monitoring for life threatening arrhythmias.
Note: MoMe ARC® does not provide interpretive statements. Interpretation and diagnosis is the responsibility of a physician. | 2. Patients with symptoms that may be due to cardiac arrhythmias. They may include by are not limited to symptoms such as: a) dizziness or lightheadedness; b) syncope of unknown etiology in which arrhythmias are suspected or need to be excluded; c) dyspnea (shortness of breath).
3. Patients with palpitations with or without known arrhythmias to obtain correlation of rhythm with symptoms.
4. Patients who require outpatient monitoring of antiarrhythmic therapy: a) Monitoring of therapeutic and potential proarrhythmic effects of membrane active drugs, b) Monitoring of effect of drugs to control ventricular rate in various atrial arrhythmias (e.g. atrial fibrillation)
5. Patients recovering from cardiac surgery who are indicated for outpatient arrhythmia monitoring
6. Patients with diagnosed sleep disordered breathing including sleep apnea (obstructive, central) to evaluate possible nocturnal arrhythmias
7. Patients requiring arrhythmia evaluation of etiology of stroke or |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
InfoBionic MoMe ARC® Traditional 510(k) K250356
Page 5 of 11
{9}
K250356
#
INFOBIONIC
510(k) Premarket Notification:
MoMe ARC® Wireless Ambulatory ECG
Monitoring and Detection System
| Characteristic | Subject Device
MoMe ARC® | Predicate Device
MoMe ARC®
(K230265) | Reference Device
Braemar Telemetry Patch System, Model BTPS-1000
(K153473) | Comparison |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | | transient cerebral ischemia, possibly secondary to atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter.
8. Patients requiring measurement, analysis and reporting of QT interval, excluding patients with a documented history of sustained atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter
9. Patients who require monitoring for potential arrhythmias based on risk factors (e.g. atrial fibrillation).
10. Patients requiring measurement of ST segment changes. The device is not intended to sound any alarms for ST segment changes.
Contraindications:
1. Patients with potentially life-threatening arrhythmias who require inpatient monitoring.
2. Patients who the attending physician recommends should be hospitalized for ECG monitoring.
3. This device should not be used for monitoring of QT interval during the initiation of antiarrhythmic therapy, where in-hospital monitoring is required by the labeling of that drug. | |
InfoBionic MoMe ARC® Traditional 510(k) K250356
Page 6 of 11
{10}
K250356
infoBionic MoMe ARC®
510(k) Premarket Notification:
MoMe ARC® Wireless Ambulatory ECG
Monitoring and Detection System
| Characteristic | Subject Device
MoMe ARC® | Predicate Device
MoMe ARC®
(K230265) | Reference Device
Braemar Telemetry Patch System, Model BTPS-1000
(K153473) | Comparison |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | | 4. The device does not replace the QT interval measurement by a trained observer using diagnostic 12 lead ECG in a clinical environment. This device is not intended to sound any alarms for QT interval changes.
5. The device does not annotate QT interval for QRS durations > 160ms or for T wave amplitudes less than or equal to 5% of the peak amplitude. | |
| Product Code | | | | |
| Product Code | DSI
(21 CFR 870.1025) | DSI
(21 CFR 870.1025) | DSI
(21 CFR 870.1025) | Identical |
| Device Use | | | | |
| Prescription Use | Prescription only | Prescription only | Prescription only | Identical |
| Intended Population | Patients > 10kg (22lbs) | Patients > 10kg (22lbs) | Patients > 10kg (22lbs) | Identical |
| Environment of Use | Physician practices, clinic, research institutions, home environments | Physician practices, clinic, research institutions, home environments | Physician practices, clinic, home environments | Identical |
| Environment Where Device Data is Stored and Reports are Generated | Remote (cloud-based) server | Remote (cloud-based) server | Remote server | Identical |
| Technological Characteristics | | | | |
InfoBionic MoMe ARC® Traditional 510(k) K250356
Page 7 of 11
{11}
K250356
infoBionic MoMe ARC® Traditional 510(k) K250356
# 510(k) Premarket Notification:
MoMe ARC® Wireless Ambulatory ECG
Monitoring and Detection System
| Characteristic | Subject Device MoMe ARC® | Predicate Device MoMe ARC® (K230265) | Reference Device Braemar Telemetry Patch System, Model BTPS-1000 (K153473) | Comparison |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Patient Contacting Material | • Polycarbonate
• 3M 1774W Thin White Polyolefin Foam Tape
• 3M 4076 SC White Spunlace Nonwoven Extended Wear Tape
• Axelgard AG600 Hydrogel
• TPV thermoplastic vulcanizate (Celanese, Santoprene TPV 8281-90MED)
• TPE thermoplastic elastomer (GLS Corp, Versaflex OM 3060-1) | • Polycarbonate
• Soda-Lime Glass
• TPU – thermoplastic polyurethane (DIOSHY TPU-T995M)
• TPV thermoplastic vulcanizate (Celanese, Santoprene TPV 8281-90MED)
• TPE thermoplastic elastomer (GLS Corp, Versaflex OM 3060-1) | • 3M Siliconized Backing Paper (3M 9834)
• 3M Non-Woven PET Film (3M 2476P)
• Hydro Gel Pad AG602
• PET: Kemafoil HSPL 80W | Different – This difference does not change the intended use of the device. No additional questions of safety and effectiveness are introduced compared to the predicate. |
| Size | 59 mm x 39 mm x 11 mm | 108 mm x 67 mm x 17 mm | 50.8 mm x 40.64 mm x 9.144 mm | Different – The dimensions of the predicate device included the Gateway Device. The difference does not change the intended use of the device. No additional question of safety and effectiveness are introduced compared to the predicate. |
| Energy Source | Rechargeable Li-ion | Rechargeable Li-ion | Rechargeable Li-ion | Identical |
| Device Components | Body-worn Sensor, Handheld Gateway, Patch | Body-worn Sensor, Handheld Gateway | Body-worn Sensor, Monitor, Patch | Equivalent to reference device. |
| Software / Firmware | Yes | Yes | Yes | Identical |
| Sterilization Method | Non-sterile | Non-sterile | Non-sterile | Identical |
| Use Type | Multi-patient use (Sensor, Gateway, Leads) and disposable patch | Multi-patient use (Sensor, Gateway, Leads) and disposable electrodes | Multi-patient use (Sensor, Monitor) and disposable patch | Identical |
InfoBionic MoMe ARC® Traditional 510(k) K250356
Page 8 of 11
{12}
K250356
INFOBIONIC
510(k) Premarket Notification: MoMe ARC® Wireless Ambulatory ECG Monitoring and Detection System
| Characteristic | Subject Device MoMe ARC® | Predicate Device MoMe ARC® (K230265) | Reference Device Braemar Telemetry Patch System, Model BTPS-1000 (K153473) | Comparison |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Number of electrodes | 1 Patch, or 3 disposable electrodes | 3 Disposable Electrodes | 1 Patch | Equivalent to reference device. |
| Number of ECG channels | 1 or 2 Channels | 2 Channels | 1, 2, or 3 Channels | Equivalent to reference device. |
| Ambulatory ECG Performance Standards | IEC 60601-2-47 | IEC 60601-2-47 | IEC 60601-2-47 | Identical |
| ECG Acquisition | Body worn sensor, handheld device with cellular module | Body worn sensor, handheld device with cellular module | Body worn sensor; handheld device with cellular module | Identical |
| ECG Transmission to Cellular | Bluetooth | Bluetooth | Bluetooth | Identical |
| ECG Transmission to Monitoring Center | 4G Cellular | 4G Cellular | Cellular | Identical |
| User Event Trigger | Handheld device user interface | Handheld device user interface | Handheld device user interface | Identical |
| Physician Access to Patient Physiological and Event Information | Yes | Yes | Yes | Identical |
| Arrhythmia Detection Algorithm | Proprietary / Server Side | Proprietary / Server Side | Proprietary | Identical |
InfoBionic MoMe ARC® Traditional 510(k) K250356
Page 9 of 11
{13}
K250356
510(k) Premarket Notification: MoMe ARC® Wireless Ambulatory ECG Monitoring and Detection System
INFOBIO NIC
# Performance Testing – Nonclinical
The MoMe ARC® submission was written according to and in conformance with FDA Guidance “Class II Special Controls Guidance Documents: Arrhythmia Detector and Alarm” (October 2003). The test reports in the submission demonstrate that MoMe ARC® meets its intended use and design requirements.
The MoMe ARC® was tested and conforms to the following voluntary FDA recognized standards:
1. ANSI AAMI ES 60601-1:2005/(R)2012 and A1:2012, C1:2009/(R)2012 and A2:2010/(R)2012 (Consolidated Text) Medical electrical equipment – Part 1: General requirements for basic safety and essential performance (IEC 60601-1:2005, MOD) Note: Has been tested and complies with the requirements of Clause 8.5.5.2 - Energy reduction test.
2. ANSI AAMI IEC 60601-1-2:2014 [Including AMD 1:2021] Medical Electrical Equipment – Part 1-2: General requirements for basic safety and essential performance - Collateral standard: Electromagnetic disturbances - Requirements and tests
3. ANSI/AAMI/IEC 60601-2-47:2012/(R)2016 Medical electrical equipment – Part 2-47: Particular requirements for the basic safety and essential performance of ambulatory electrocardiographic systems
4. IEC /TR 60601-4-2 Edition 1.0 2016-05 Guidance and interpretation - Electromagnetic immunity: performance of medical electrical equipment and medical electrical systems
5. FIRST CVSS v4.0 Common Vulnerability Scoring System version 4.0
6. IEEE ANSI USEMCSC C63.27-2021 American National Standard for Evaluation of Wireless Coexistence
7. ISO 10993-1:2018 Biological evaluation of medical devices – Part 1: Evaluation and testing within a risk management process
8. ISO 10993-2:2022 Biological evaluation of medical devices – Part 2: Animal welfare requirements
9. ISO 10993-5:2009 Biological evaluation of medical devices – Part 5: Tests for in vitro cytotoxicity
10. ISO 10993-10:2021 Biological evaluation of medical devices – Part 10: Tests for skin sensitization
11. ISO 10993-12:2021 Biological evaluation of medical devices – Part 12: Sample preparation and reference material
12. ISO 10993-23:2021 Biological evaluation of medical devices – Part 23: Tests for irritation
13. IEC 60601-1-11:2015 + A1:2020 Medical electrical equipment – Part 1-11: General requirements for basic safety and essential performance – Collateral standard: Requirements for medical electrical equipment and medical electrical systems used in the home healthcare environment
14. ANSI/AAMI EC12:2000(R) 2020 - Disposable ECG electrodes
15. ASTM F1980 – 21: Accelerated Aging of Sterile Barrier Systems and Medical Devices
16. ANSI AAMI EC57:2012 Testing and reporting performance results of cardiac rhythm and ST-segment measurement algorithms
# Performance Testing – Clinical
Clinical testing was performed to validate the performance of the Software Platform (K152491) with the MoMe ARC® 1-lead patch system (Subject Device).
InfoBionic MoMe ARC® Traditional 510(k) K250356
{14}
K250356
510(k) Premarket Notification: MoMe ARC® Wireless Ambulatory ECG Monitoring and Detection System
Clinical data were prospectively collected from 87 adult subjects at a single U.S. clinic. Each subject served as their own control and was assigned to one of two cohorts:
- Inpatient (n = 75): Patients admitted to the hospital and undergoing continuous cardiac telemetry monitoring
- Outpatient (n = 12): Patients undergoing prescribed ambulatory monitoring for cardiac arrhythmia detection and analysis.
## Demographics
- Sex: 64 male, 23 female
- Age: 21-87 years (mean 65.2 years)
## Study Objectives
- Primary: Collect data from a single-lead ECG patch device for evaluation using InfoBionic ECG automated algorithms (FDA 510(k) = K152491).
- Secondary: Collection of data on a single-lead ECG patch device in patients admitted to a hospital that are currently being monitored with continuous cardiac telemetry.
No adverse events occurred during or after enrollment. Data from all 87 subjects were adjudicated by Certified Cardiac Technicians (CCTs) using Holter software, with beat locations, morphologies, and arrhythmia annotations serving as the reference standard. The Software Platform's sensitivity and positive predictivity were calculated using ANSI/AMI/IEC EC57:2012 methods.
## Key Results
- Sensitivity: Met predefined acceptance criteria for arrhythmia detection.
- Positive Predictivity (+P): Met predefined acceptance criteria versus CCT reference.
- Heart-Rate Accuracy: Mean absolute error of ± 0.247 bpm compared to reference.
These results provide objective evidence that the MoMe Software platform algorithm accurately detects and triggers abnormal rhythms noted on MoMe ARC® 1-Lead Patch ECG tracings in both inpatient and outpatient environments, supporting the subject device's safety and effectiveness for its intended use as compared to the predicate.
## Conclusion
In conclusion, the intended use of the MoMe ARC® is identical to the intended use of the predicate device (K230265). The technological characteristics of the MoMe ARC® are equivalent to those of the predicate (K230265) and reference (K153473) devices. Testing has demonstrated that the MoMe ARC® is substantially equivalent to, and as safe and effective as, the predicate (K230265) and reference (K153473) devices.
InfoBionic MoMe ARC® Traditional 510(k) K250356
Page 11 of 11
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.