Single Use Electrosurgical Knife (KD-612L, KD-612U); Single Use Electrosurgical Knife (KD-620UR); Single Use Electrosurgical Knife (KD-650L, KD-650U)
K250351 · Olympus Medical Systems Corporation · KNS · Oct 10, 2025 · Gastroenterology, Urology
Device Facts
Record ID
K250351
Device Name
Single Use Electrosurgical Knife (KD-612L, KD-612U); Single Use Electrosurgical Knife (KD-620UR); Single Use Electrosurgical Knife (KD-650L, KD-650U)
Applicant
Olympus Medical Systems Corporation
Product Code
KNS · Gastroenterology, Urology
Decision Date
Oct 10, 2025
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 876.4300
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic
Indications for Use
The Single Use Electrosurgical Knife KD-612 Series is intended to be used to cut tissue using high-frequency current within the digestive tract in combination with an endoscope and electrosurgical units. The Single Use Electrosurgical Knife KD-620UR is intended to be used to cut tissue using high-frequency current within the digestive tract in combination with an endoscope and electrosurgical units. The Single Use Electrosurgical Knife KD-650 Series is intended to be used to cut tissue using high-frequency current within the digestive tract in combination with an endoscope and electrosurgical units.
Device Story
Single-use electrosurgical knife (models KD-612, KD-620UR, KD-650) used for endoscopic tissue cutting in digestive tract. Device consists of handle with slider and insertion portion with stainless-steel cutting knife. Operator (physician) inserts device through endoscope; slider mechanism extends/retracts knife from distal sheath. High-frequency current applied via external electrosurgical unit to perform cutting. Used in clinical settings (e.g., endoscopy suites). Output is physical tissue incision. Benefits include precise endoscopic tissue resection. No irrigation feature present.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. Performance tests included insertion/withdrawal, slider operation, tissue cutting efficacy, connection strength, histopathological evaluation of thermal denaturation range, human factors evaluation, sterilization/shelf-life, and biocompatibility. All samples met pre-defined acceptance criteria.
Technological Characteristics
Sterile (EO) single-use endoscopic accessory. Materials include stainless-steel cutting knife. Energy source: external electrosurgical unit (high-frequency current). Form factor: handle with slider and insertion sheath. No software or electronic components.
Indications for Use
Indicated for patients requiring endoscopic tissue cutting within the digestive tract using high-frequency electrosurgical current.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
An endoscopic electrosurgical unit and accessories is a device used to perform electrosurgical procedures through an endoscope. This generic type of device includes the electrosurgical generator, patient plate, electric biopsy forceps, electrode, flexible snare, electrosurgical alarm system, electrosurgical power supply unit, electrical clamp, self-opening rigid snare, flexible suction coagulator electrode, patient return wristlet, contact jelly, adaptor to the cord for transurethral surgical instruments, the electric cord for transurethral surgical instruments, and the transurethral desiccator.
Predicate Devices
Olympus Single Use Electrosurgical Knife KD-611L (K092309)
Olympus Single Use Electrosurgical Knife KD-625UR (K182408)
Olympus Single Use Electrosurgical Knife KD-655L, KD-655U (K171158)
Reference Devices
Olympus Single Use Electrosurgical Knife KD-620LR (K092309)
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}
FDA U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION
October 10, 2025
Olympus Medical Systems Corporation
% Susan Lewandowski
Program Manager, Regulatory Affairs
Olympus Surgical Technologies of America
800 West Park Drive
Westborough, Massachusetts 01581
Re: K250351
Trade/Device Name: Single Use Electrosurgical Knife (KD-612L, KD-612U); Single Use Electrosurgical Knife (KD-620UR); Single Use Electrosurgical Knife (KD-650L, KD-650U)
Regulation Number: 21 CFR 876.4300
Regulation Name: Endoscopic Electrosurgical Unit And Accessories
Regulatory Class: Class II
Product Code: KNS
Dated: September 12, 2025
Received: September 12, 2025
Dear Susan Lewandowski:
We have reviewed your section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database available at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of
U.S. Food & Drug Administration
10903 New Hampshire Avenue
Silver Spring, MD 20993
www.fda.gov
{1}
K250351 - Susan Lewandowski
Page 2
Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Additional information about changes that may require a new premarket notification are provided in the FDA guidance documents entitled "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99812/download) and "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Software Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99785/download).
Your device is also subject to, among other requirements, the Quality System (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820), which includes, but is not limited to, 21 CFR 820.30, Design controls; 21 CFR 820.90, Nonconforming product; and 21 CFR 820.100, Corrective and preventive action. Please note that regardless of whether a change requires premarket review, the QS regulation requires device manufacturers to review and approve changes to device design and production (21 CFR 820.30 and 21 CFR 820.70) and document changes and approvals in the device master record (21 CFR 820.181).
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR Part 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reporting-combination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR Parts 1000-1050.
All medical devices, including Class I and unclassified devices and combination product device constituent parts are required to be in compliance with the final Unique Device Identification System rule ("UDI Rule"). The UDI Rule requires, among other things, that a device bear a unique device identifier (UDI) on its label and package (21 CFR 801.20(a)) unless an exception or alternative applies (21 CFR 801.20(b)) and that the dates on the device label be formatted in accordance with 21 CFR 801.18. The UDI Rule (21 CFR 830.300(a) and 830.320(b)) also requires that certain information be submitted to the Global Unique Device Identification Database (GUDID) (21 CFR Part 830 Subpart E). For additional information on these requirements, please see the UDI System webpage at https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance/unique-device-identification-system-udi-system.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reporting-mdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about medical devices and radiation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See
{2}
K250351 - Susan Lewandowski
Page 3
the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
SIVAKAMI VENKATACHALAM -S
for
Shanil P. Haugen, Ph.D.
Assistant Director
DHT3A: Division of Renal, Gastrointestinal,
Obesity and Transplant Devices
OHT3: Office of Gastrorenal, ObGyn,
General Hospital and Urology Devices
Office of Product Evaluation and Quality
Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{3}
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
Indications for Use
Form Approved: OMB No. 0910-0120
Expiration Date: 07/31/2026
See PRA Statement below.
Submission Number (if known)
K250351
Device Name
Single Use Electrosurgical Knife (KD-612L, KD-612U);
Single Use Electrosurgical Knife (KD-620UR);
Single Use Electrosurgical Knife (KD-650L, KD-650U)
Indications for Use (Describe)
The Single Use Electrosurgical Knife KD-612 Series is intended to be used to cut tissue using high-frequency current within the digestive tract in combination with an endoscope and electrosurgical units.
The Single Use Electrosurgical Knife KD-620UR is intended to be used to cut tissue using high-frequency current within the digestive tract in combination with an endoscope and electrosurgical units.
The Single Use Electrosurgical Knife KD-650 Series is intended to be used to cut tissue using high-frequency current within the digestive tract in combination with an endoscope and electrosurgical units.
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
☑ Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
☐ Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
## CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
*DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
Department of Health and Human Services
Food and Drug Administration
Office of Chief Information Officer
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff
PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov
“An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number.”
{4}
OLYMPUS
K250351
Page 1 of 3
Single Use Electrosurgical Knife KD-612, KD-620UR, and KD-650
# 510(k) Summary
## 1. General Information
Date Prepared: September 12, 2025
510(K) submitter: Olympus Medical Systems Corporation
2951 Ishikawa-cho, Hachioji-shi, Tokyo Japan 192-8507
Contact: Seiki Yunoki
Correspondent: Olympus Surgical Technologies of America
800 West Park Drive, Westborough, MA 01581
Primary Contact: Susan Lewandowski
Email: susan.lewandowski@olympus.com
## 2. Device Information
Device Name: Single Use Electrosurgical Knife KD-612
Single Use Electrosurgical Knife KD-620UR
Single Use Electrosurgical Knife KD-650
Model Name: Single Use Electrosurgical Knife KD-612L, KD-612U
Single Use Electrosurgical Knife KD-620UR
Single Use Electrosurgical Knife KD-650L, KD-650U
Common Name: Electrosurgical Knife
Classification: 876.4300 – Endoscopic electrosurgical unit and accessories
Regulatory Class: II
Product Code: KNS
Device Panel: Gastroenterology & Urology
## 3. Predicate Device Information
| Subject Device | Predicate Device | Reference Device |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Single Use Electrosurgical Knife KD-612L, KD-612U | Olympus Single Use Electrosurgical Knife KD-611L (K092309) | N/A |
| Single Use Electrosurgical Knife KD-620UR | Olympus Single Use Electrosurgical Knife KD-625UR (K182408) | Olympus Single Use Electrosurgical Knife KD-620LR (K092309) |
| Single Use Electrosurgical Knife KD-650L, KD-650U | Olympus Single Use Electrosurgical Knife KD-655L, KD-655U (K171158) | N/A |
Page 1 of 3
{5}
OLYMPUS
K250351
Page 2 of 3
Single Use Electrosurgical Knife KD-612, KD-620UR, and KD-650
## 4. Device Description
The Single Use Electrosurgical Knife was designed to be used with compatible Olympus endoscopes, A-Cord (power cable), and electrosurgical units to cut tissue using high-frequency current within the digestive tract. The subject device is inserted endoscopically into the body cavity and tissue is cut by applying a high frequency current. The subject device is a sterile (EO) single use electrosurgical knife comprised of a handle and an insertion portion. The handle portion consists of the body and the slider. The insertion portion consists of the distal end with one lumen for the stainless-steel cutting knife and the sheath portion. The slider extends the cutting knife from the distal end of the sheath/tube when pushed and retracts the cutting knife into the sheath/tube when the slider is pulled. The Single Use Electrosurgical Knife is available in three different models: KD-612, KD-620UR, and KD-650. The primary difference between the models is the tip shape of the distal end. The subject device has the same technological characteristics and similar design as the applicable predicate device.
## 5. Indications for Use
The Single Use Electrosurgical Knife KD-612 Series is intended to be used to cut tissue using high frequency current within the digestive tract in combination with an endoscope and electrosurgical units.
The Single Use Electrosurgical Knife KD-620UR is intended to be used to cut tissue using high frequency current within the digestive tract in combination with an endoscope and electrosurgical units.
The Single Use Electrosurgical Knife KD-650 Series is intended to be used to cut tissue using high frequency current within the digestive tract in combination with an endoscope and electrosurgical units.
## 6. Predicate Comparison
### Intended Use
The subject, predicate, and reference devices are intended to be used with endoscopes and electrosurgical units to cut tissue using high-frequency current within the digestive tract.
- The intended use between KD-612U/L and predicate KD-611L is identical.
- The intended use between KD-620UR, predicate KD-625UR, and reference KD-620LR is identical except for the addition of a statement in the predicate's intended use relating to the induction of normal saline into the submucosa. The subject device KD-620UR does not have an irrigation feature, therefore this difference has no impact.
- The intended use between KD-650L/U and predicate KD-655L/U is identical except for the addition of a statement in the predicate's intended use relating to the induction of normal saline into the submucosa. The subject device KD-620UR does not have an irrigation feature, therefore this difference has no impact.
Page 2 of 3
{6}
OLYMPUS
K250351
Page 3 of 3
Single Use Electrosurgical Knife KD-612, KD-620UR, and KD-650
## Technological Similarities
- The basic principles of operation are similar between the subject, predicate, and reference devices. All use high frequency current to cut tissue within the digestive tract.
- All are single-use devices provided sterile (Ethylene Oxide) to the end user.
## Technological Differences
- Minor dimension differences
The dimensional differences do not impact the safety or effectiveness of the subject device as demonstrated by Performance Testing – Bench.
## 7. Non-Clinical/Clinical Tests Summary and Conclusion
Olympus performed bench testing to demonstrate substantial equivalence to the predicate device. Test samples were final, finished devices subjected to the full manufacturing process including sterilization.
The following performance bench tests were conducted to demonstrate substantial equivalence between the subject and predicate devices. All test samples passed pre-defined acceptance criteria.
- Insertion into and Withdrawal from an endoscope
- Advancing and Retreating through an endoscope
- Slider Operation
- Cut Digestive Tract Mucosa
- Connection Strength of the Insertion portion and the Handle portion
- Connection Strength of the Working portion
- Histopathological Evaluation for Thermal Denaturation Range
- Human Factors Evaluation
The following testing was also conducted.
- Sterilization/Shelf-life
- Biocompatibility
## 8. Conclusion
Based on the comparison to the predicate device, intended use, technological characteristics, and performance testing, the Single Use Electrosurgical Knife KD-612, KD-620UR, and KD-650 raise no new issues of safety and effectiveness and are substantially equivalent to the predicate device in terms of safety, efficacy, and performance.
Page 3 of 3
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.