K250297 · Techfit Digital Surgery, Inc. · GWO · Oct 27, 2025 · Neurology
Device Facts
Record ID
K250297
Device Name
TECHFIT Patient-Specific Cranial System
Applicant
Techfit Digital Surgery, Inc.
Product Code
GWO · Neurology
Decision Date
Oct 27, 2025
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 882.5320
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic
Indications for Use
The TECHFIT Patient-Specific Cranial System is intended to replace bony voids in the cranial skeleton. The devices are indicated for adults and adolescents from 18 years or older.
Device Story
System replaces cranial bony voids using patient-specific PEEK implants. Input: patient CT scan data. Process: DISRP software facilitates digital planning, visualization, and 3D implant design; implants manufactured via CNC machining. Output: patient-specific PEEK cranial implant and 3D-printed anatomical model. Used in clinical settings by surgeons; implant attached to native bone using commercial plates/screws. Software aids preoperative planning and implant customization. Benefits: provides anatomically matched reconstruction to restore cranial integrity.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical data. Substantial equivalence supported by bench testing: dimensional accuracy, compatibility with JEIL Le Forte Neuro Plating System, adjustment testing on anatomical models, mechanical testing (tensile and four-point bending), and comprehensive biocompatibility testing per ISO 10993 series (cytotoxicity, sensitization, irritation, hemolysis, systemic toxicity, pyrogenicity, genotoxicity, carcinogenicity, implantation, and neurotoxicity).
Technological Characteristics
Material: PEEK (ASTM F2026). Manufacturing: CNC machining for implants; 3D printing (clear resin) for anatomical models. Fixation: Commercial plates/screws. Sterilization: Moist heat (steam). Connectivity: Software-based planning (DISRP).
Indications for Use
Indicated for adults and adolescents 18 years or older requiring replacement of bony voids in the cranial skeleton.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A preformed alterable cranioplasty plate is a device that is implanted into a patient to repair a skull defect. It is constructed of a material, e.g., tantalum, that can be altered or reshaped at the time of surgery without changing the chemical behavior of the material.
Predicate Devices
Synthes Patient Specific Cranial/Craniofacial Implant (PSCI) (K053199)
Reference Devices
OsteoFabTM Patient Specific Cranial Device Samples (K121818)
{0}
FDA U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION
October 27, 2025
TECHFIT Digital Surgery Inc.
Angela Lema
Regulatory Affairs Specialist
1511 Aviation Center Pkwy, Suite 220H
Daytona, Florida 32114
Re: K250297
Trade/Device Name: TECHFIT Patient-Specific Cranial System
Regulation Number: 21 CFR 882.5320
Regulation Name: Preformed Alterable Cranioplasty Plate
Regulatory Class: Class II
Product Code: GWO
Dated: September 26, 2025
Received: September 26, 2025
Dear Angela Lema:
We have reviewed your section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database available at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Additional information about changes that may require a new premarket notification are provided in the FDA guidance documents entitled "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99812/download) and "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Software Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99785/download).
U.S. Food & Drug Administration
10903 New Hampshire Avenue
Silver Spring, MD 20993
www.fda.gov
{1}
K250297 - Angela Lema
Page 2
Your device is also subject to, among other requirements, the Quality System (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820), which includes, but is not limited to, 21 CFR 820.30, Design controls; 21 CFR 820.90, Nonconforming product; and 21 CFR 820.100, Corrective and preventive action. Please note that regardless of whether a change requires premarket review, the QS regulation requires device manufacturers to review and approve changes to device design and production (21 CFR 820.30 and 21 CFR 820.70) and document changes and approvals in the device master record (21 CFR 820.181).
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR Part 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reporting-combination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR Parts 1000-1050.
All medical devices, including Class I and unclassified devices and combination product device constituent parts are required to be in compliance with the final Unique Device Identification System rule ("UDI Rule"). The UDI Rule requires, among other things, that a device bear a unique device identifier (UDI) on its label and package (21 CFR 801.20(a)) unless an exception or alternative applies (21 CFR 801.20(b)) and that the dates on the device label be formatted in accordance with 21 CFR 801.18. The UDI Rule (21 CFR 830.300(a) and 830.320(b)) also requires that certain information be submitted to the Global Unique Device Identification Database (GUDID) (21 CFR Part 830 Subpart E). For additional information on these requirements, please see the UDI System webpage at https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance/unique-device-identification-system-udi-system.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reporting-mdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about medical devices and radiation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
{2}
K250297 - Angela Lema
Page 3
Sincerely,
Adam D. Pierce -S
Digitally signed by
Adam D. Pierce -S
Date: 2025.10.27
13:38:20 -04'00'
Adam D. Pierce, Ph.D.
Assistant Director
DHT5A: Division of Neurosurgical,
Neurointerventional, and
Neurodiagnostic Devices
OHT5: Office of Neurological and
Physical Medicine Devices
Office of Product Evaluation and Quality
Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{3}
FORM FDA 3881 (8/23)
Page 1 of 1
PSC Publishing Services (301) 443-6740
EF
| DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Food and Drug Administration Indications for Use | Form Approved: OMB No. 0910-0120 Expiration Date: 07/31/2026 See PRA Statement below. |
| --- | --- |
| 510(k) Number (if known) K250297 | |
| Device Name TECHFIT Patient-Specific Cranial System | |
| Indications for Use (Describe) The TECHFIT Patient-Specific Cranial System is intended to replace bony voids in the cranial skeleton. The devices are indicated for adults and adolescents from 18 years or older. | |
| Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable) ☑ Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) ☐ Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C) | |
| CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED. | |
| This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.* | |
| The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to: Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov | |
| "An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number." | |
{4}
K250297, Page 1 of 15
# Traditional 510(K) – Summary
## Table of Contents
1. 510(k) summary ... 2
1.1 Submitter information ... 2
1.2 Submission date ... 2
1.3 Submission information ... 2
1.5 Predicate device ... 3
1.6 Reference devices ... 3
1.7 Device Information ... 5
1.8 Device Description ... 5
1.9 Indications for use ... 6
2. Comparison of Predicate Device ... 6
2.1. Similarities ... 6
2.2. Differences from the predicate device ... 7
3. Performance data ... 13
4. Conclusion ... 16
{5}
K250297, Page 2 of 15
# 1. 510(k) summary
The 510(k) summary is provided on the following page per 21 CFR 807.92(c).
The following section is included as required by the Safe Medical Devices Act (SMDA) of 1990 and 21 CFR 807.92
# 1.1 Submitter information
Table 1. Submitter Information
| Company name | TECHFIT Digital Surgery Inc. |
| --- | --- |
| Establishment registration number | 3004187715 |
| Street Address | 1511 Aviation Center Pkwy, Suite 220H |
| City | Daytona Beach |
| Zip code | FL 32114 |
| Country | United States |
| Phone number | +57 604 322 33 75 Ext. 165 |
| Fax number | +57 604 338 30 13 |
| Principal contact person | Angela Maria Lema-Perez |
| Contact title | Regulatory Affairs Specialist |
| Contact e-mail address | angela.lema@techfits.com |
| Additional contact person | Susana Muñoz |
| Contact title | R&D coordinator |
| Contact e-mail address | susana.munoz@techfits.com |
# 1.2 Submission date
Date of the 510(k): 31st January 2025.
# 1.3 Submission information
Table 2. Submission Information - Subject device
| Trade name | TECHFIT Patient-Specific Cranial System |
| --- | --- |
| Common or Usual name | Cranioplasty |
| Classification name | Plate, Cranioplasty, Preformed, Alterable |
{6}
K250297, Page 3 of 15
# 1.5 Predicate device
Table 3. Predicate device
| Predicate Device: Synthes Patient Specific Cranial/Craniofacial Implant (PSCI) | |
| --- | --- |
| Trade or proprietary or model name | Synthes Patient Specific Cranial/Craniofacial Implant (PSCI) |
| 510(k) number | K053199 |
| Decision date | 12/14/2005 |
| Product code | GXN |
| Manufacturer | Synthes (USA) |
# 1.6 Reference devices
The general information of the reference devices is the following:
Table 4. Reference device 1
| Reference device 1: OsteoFabTM Patient Specific Cranial Device Samples | |
| --- | --- |
| Trade or proprietary or model name | OsteoFabTM Patient Specific Cranial Device Samples |
| 510(k) number | K121818 |
| Decision date | 18/18/2012 |
| Product code | GXN |
| Manufacturer | Oxford Performance Materials, LLC |
| Review panel | Neurology |
Table 5. Reference device 2
| Reference device 2: LeForte Neuro System Bone Plate & Screw | |
| --- | --- |
| Trade or proprietary or model name | LeForte Neuro System Bone Plate & Screw |
{7}
K250297, Page 4 of 15
Table 6. Reference device 3
| Reference device 3: TECHFIT DISRP® System | |
| --- | --- |
| Trade or proprietary or model name | TECHFIT DISRP® System |
| 510(k) number | K230276 |
| Decision date | 06/23/2023 |
| Product code | DZJ, LLZ |
| Manufacturer | TECHFIT Digital Surgery |
| Review panel | Dental |
Table 7. Reference device 4
| Reference device 4: TECHFIT Diagnostic Models | |
| --- | --- |
| Trade or proprietary or model name | TECHFIT Diagnostic Models |
| 510(k) number | K222577 |
| Decision date | 06/01/2023 |
| Product code | LLZ |
| Manufacturer | TECHFIT Digital Surgery |
| Review panel | Dental |
Table 8. Reference device 5
| Reference device 5: ANATOMIC PEEK™ Cervical Fusion System | |
| --- | --- |
| Trade or proprietary or model name | Anatomic PEEK™ Cervical Fusion System |
| 510(k) number | K192502 |
{8}
K250297, Page 5 of 15
# 1.7 Device Information
Table 9 presents the device information of the subject device and predicate device.
Table 9. Device Information
| | Subject device: Techfit Patient-Specific Cranial System | Predicate device: Synthes Patient Specific Cranial/Craniofacial Implants |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Product code | GWO | GXN |
| Classification | 21 CFR 882.5320, Class II | 21 CFR 882.5330, Class II |
| Intended Use | The TECHFIT Patient-Specific Cranial System is intended to replace bony voids in the cranial skeleton. The devices are indicated for adults and adolescents from 18 years or older. | The Synthes (USA) Patient Specific Cranial/Craniofacial Implant is intended to replace bony voids in the cranial/craniofacial skeleton. |
# 1.8 Device Description
The TECHFIT Patient-Specific Cranial System is patient specific devices intended to replace bony voids in the cranial/craniofacial skeleton. The TECHFIT Patient-Specific Cranial System includes a cranial implant, cranial model and a software component for digital planning and visualization named Digitally Integrated Surgical Reconstruction Platform DISRP®.
TECHFIT Patient-Specific Cranial Implants are manufactured from Polyether Ether Ketone (PEEK). The TECHFIT Patient-Specific Cranial Implants are attached to the native bone using commercial plates and screws.
The TECHFIT Patient-Specific Cranial System matches the shape and dimensions of the missing skull bone fragments. The implants are manufactured from PEEK according to ASTM F2026 and are manufactured by machining process.
The TECHFIT Patient-Specific Cranial System models are patient specific devices manufactured from clear resin using 3D printing manufacturing process. Those models are a representation of the anatomy of the patient, and they are not indicated to enter to the OR (Operating Room).
{9}
K250297, Page 6 of 15
## 1.9 Indications for use
The TECHFIT Patient-Specific Cranial System is intended to replace bony voids in the cranial skeleton.
The devices are indicated for adults and adolescents from 18 years or older.
## 2. Comparison of Predicate Device
### 2.1. Similarities
Intended use: equivalent
The subject device and the predicate device share similar intended use and are intended for the same anatomical region. Table 10 demonstrates intended use equivalence.
Table 10. TECHFIT patient-specific Cranial Implant and Synthes Patient Specific Cranial/Craniofacial Implant (PSCI) intended use equivalence.
| Subject device | Predicate device |
| --- | --- |
| Techfit Patient-Specific Cranial System | Synthes Patient Specific Cranial/Craniofacial Implants |
| The TECHFIT Patient-Specific Cranial System is intended to replace bony voids in the cranial skeleton. | The Synthes (USA) Patient Specific Cranial/Craniofacial Implant is intended to replace bony voids in the cranial/craniofacial skeleton. |
| The devices are indicated for adults and adolescents from 18 years or older. | |
{10}
K250297, Page 7 of 15
Patient-specific configuration: equivalent
The subject device and the predicate device are manufactured specifically to match the patient's anatomy. The design process for both the subject and the predicate device starts from a patient's CT scan, taken according to a specific CT scan protocol.
System fixation: equivalent
The subject device and the predicate device are designed and manufactured with integrated screw holes to fixate the device to the bone using bone screws or plates.
Sterility: equivalent
The subject and predicate devices are all provided non-sterile and must be sterilized by moist heat prior to surgery.
Manufacturing method: equivalent
Both, subject and predicate, have the same manufacturing method by CNC machining.
Material: equivalent
The subject and the predicate devices plates are made from PEEK.
# 2.2. Differences from the predicate device
TECHFIT implants differ in that they are indicated for use in adults and adolescents aged 18 years or older, while the Synthes device is indicated for adult patients only.
The TECHFIT Patient-Specific Cranial System differs from the predicate device, the Synthes Patient Specific Cranial/Craniofacial Implant (PSCI), by including an anatomical model and a software component, the Digitally Integrated Surgical Reconstruction Platform (DISRP®). While the predicate device solely comprises, implantable components designed to replace bony voids in the cranial skeleton, the TECHFIT system incorporates an anatomical model to enhance preoperative planning. Additionally, the DISRP® software provides digital planning and a 3D viewer to optimize implant design, surgical procedures and facilitates the customization of both the implant and the anatomical model, and DISRP® System is a system that includes not only software but also orthognathic surgical guides, and these guides are not part of the Cranial System submission. These differences reflect advancements in patient-specific medical device technology, enhancing surgical workflow and precision while maintaining the fundamental purpose of cranial reconstruction.
TECHFIT implants differ from the predicate device because the predicate device includes titanium cranial implants.
Table 11 shows the details of the subject, predicate and reference devices.
{11}
Table 11. Comparison table
| Characteristic / Name of the device | Subject device TECHFIT Patient-Specific Cranial Implants System | Predicate device Synthes Patient Specific Cranial/Craniofacial Implant | Reference device # 1 OsteoFabTM Patient Specific Cranial Device | Reference device # 2 LeForte Neuro, System Bone Plate & Screw | Reference device # 3 TECHFIT DISRP® System | Reference device # 4 TECHFIT Diagnostic Models | Reference device # 5 ANATOMIC PEEK™ Cervical Fusion System |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 510K number | K250297 | K053199 | K121818 | K141452 | K230276 | K222577 | K192502 |
| Intended Use | The TECHFIT Patient-Specific Cranial System is intended to replace bony voids in the cranial skeleton. The devices are indicated for adults and adolescents from 18 years. | The Synthes (USA) Patient Specific Cranial/Craniofacial Implant is intended to replace bony voids in the cranial/craniofacial skeleton. | The OsteoFabTM Patient Specific Cranial Device (OPSCD) intended for the replacement of bony voids in the cranial skeleton | This device is intended for use in selective trauma of the cranial skeleton, cranial surgery and reconstructive procedures. | TECHFIT Digitally Integrated Surgical Reconstruction Platform (DISRP) System is intended for use as a software system and image segmentation system for the transfer of imaging information from a medical scanner such as a CT based system. The | The TECHFIT Diagnostic Models are patient-specific devices intended to be used as a pre-operative planning tool for treatment in the field of maxillofacial surgery. The input data file (DICOM imaging information from a medical scanner file) is processed by commercial off-the-shelf | The ANATOMIC PEEK™ Cervical Fusion System is indicated for cervical interbody fusion procedures in skeletally mature patients with cervical disc disease at one level from the C2-C3 disc to the C7-T1 disc. Cervical disc disease is defined as intractable radiculopathy and/or myelopathy with herniated disc and/or osteophyte formation on posterior vertebral endplates |
{12}
| Characteristic / Name of the device | Subject device TECHFIT Patient-Specific Cranial Implants System | Predicate device Synthes Patient Specific Cranial/Craniofacial Implant | Reference device # 1 OsteoFabTM Patient Specific Cranial Device | Reference device # 2 LeForte Neuro, System Bone Plate & Screw | Reference device # 3 TECHFIT DISRP® System | Reference device # 4 TECHFIT Diagnostic Models | Reference device # 5 ANATOMIC PEEK™ Cervical Fusion System |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | | | | input data file is processed by the DISRP System, and the result is an output data file that may then be provided as digital models or used as input to a rapid prototyping portion of the system that produces physical outputs including surgical guides and splints for use in maxillofacial surgery. The DISRP System is also intended as a preoperative software tool for simulating / | software, and the result is an output data file that may then be provided as digital models or used as input to produce physical anatomic models using additive manufacturing. The physical replica can be used for diagnostic purposes in the field of, maxillofacial applications. TECHFIT Diagnostic Models should be used in conjunction with other diagnostic tools and expert clinical judgment. TECHFIT Diagnostic | producing symptomatic nerve root and/or spinal cord compression confirmed by radiographic studies. This device is to be used in patients who have had six weeks of non-operative treatment. The ANATOMIC PEEK device is to be used with supplemental fixation. The ANATOMIC PEEK cervical fusion system is also required to be used with autogenous bone and/or allograft bone graft comprised of cancellous and/or corticocancellous bone graft, and/or demineralized allograft bone with |
{13}
| Characteristic / Name of the device | Subject device TECHFIT Patient-Specific Cranial Implants System | Predicate device Synthes Patient Specific Cranial/Craniofacial Implant | Reference device # 1 OsteoFabTM Patient Specific Cranial Device | Reference device # 2 LeForte Neuro, System Bone Plate & Screw | Reference device # 3 TECHFIT DISRP® System | Reference device # 4 TECHFIT Diagnostic Models | Reference device # 5 ANATOMIC PEEK™ Cervical Fusion System |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | | | | evaluating surgical treatment options. The DISRP system is compatible with the TECHFIT Patient-Specific Maxillofacial System and the TECHFIT Diagnostic Models and should be used in conjunction with expert clinical judgment. | Models are not intended to enter the operating room | bone marrow aspirated and is to be implanted via open anterior approach. |
| Product code | GWO | GXN | GXN | GWO, GXR, HBW | DZJ, LLZ | LLZ | MAX, OVD, ODP, OVE, MQP, PLR |
| Classification | Class II | Class II | Class II | Class II | Class II | Class II | Class II |
| Regulation Number | 21 CFR 882.5320 | 21 CFR 882.5330 | 21 CFR 882.5330 | 21 CFR 882.5320
21 CFR 882.5250
21 CFR 882.5360 | 21 CFR 872.4120
21 CFR 892.2050 | 21 CFR 892.2050 | 21 CFR 888.3080 |
{14}
| Characteristic / Name of the device | Subject device TECHFIT Patient-Specific Cranial Implants System | Predicate device Synthes Patient Specific Cranial/Craniofacial Implant | Reference device # 1 OsteoFabTM Patient Specific Cranial Device | Reference device # 2 LeForte Neuro, System Bone Plate & Screw | Reference device # 3 TECHFIT DISRP® System | Reference device # 4 TECHFIT Diagnostic Models | Reference device # 5 ANATOMIC PEEK™ Cervical Fusion System |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Fixation method | The implant is attached to the bone with FDA cleared commercially available screw or plates systems. | The implants are attached to the bone using standard Synthes cranial and craniofacial plates and screws in sizes 1.3 mm through 2.0 mm. | The OPSCD is attached to native bone with commercially available cranioplasty fixation system | Screws | NA | NA | The ANATOMIC PEEK devices must be used with supplemental fixation. |
| Material(s) | Polyether Ether Ketone (PEEK) ASTM F2026 | CP Titanium or PEEK | OXPEKK | Plates - CP Ti Gr 1,2,3, and 4 (ASTM F7) Screw – Ti 6Al4V ELI (ASTM F136) | Resin Orthognathic Surgical guides: Biomed Clear Resin. Machined Orthognathic Surgical Guides: CP Titanium. Metal sleeves: CP Titanium | Clear Resin | Polyether Ether Ketone (PEEK) |
| Manufacturer | TECHFIT Digital Surgery, Inc. | Synthes USA | Oxford Performance Material, LLC | Jeil Medical Corporation | TECHFIT Digital Surgery, Inc. | TECHFIT Digital Surgery, Inc. | Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA |
| Target population | Adults and adolescents from 18 years old. | Adults | Adults | Adults | Adults | Adults | Adults |
{15}
| Characteristic / Name of the device | Subject device TECHFIT Patient-Specific Cranial Implants System | Predicate device Synthes Patient Specific Cranial/Craniofacial Implant | Reference device # 1 OsteoFabTM Patient Specific Cranial Device | Reference device # 2 LeForte Neuro, System Bone Plate & Screw | Reference device # 3 TECHFIT DISRP® System | Reference device # 4 TECHFIT Diagnostic Models | Reference device # 5 ANATOMIC PEEK™ Cervical Fusion System |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Sterilization | Non-sterile (Steam) | Non-sterile (Steam) | Non-sterile | Non-sterile | Non-sterile (Steam) | NA | Sterile |
| Patient-specific devices? | Yes. Devices are manufactured patient-specific, based on a CT scan of the patient | Yes. Devices are manufactured patient-specific, based on a CT scan of the patient | Custom sized to each patient utilizing CT data | No | Yes. Devices are manufactured patient-specific, based on a CT scan of the patient | Yes. Devices are manufactured patient-specific, based on a CT scan of the patient | No |
| Manufacturing method | Machining | Machining | 3D printing laser sintering process | Machining | 3D printing Machining | Additive Manufacturing | Machining |
| Anatomical sites | Cranial skeleton | Cranial/craniofacial skeleton | Cranial skeleton | Cranial/craniofacial skeleton | Maxillofacial | Maxillofacial | Cervical spine |
| Device characteristics | PEEK implant is 3.0 mm thick (nominal) | Titanium implant is 2.5 mm thick (nominal) PEEK implant is 3.0 mm thick (nominal). | Thickness 1mm, 2mm, 4mm and release criteria for 3.2mm thickness | Plate thickness 0.3mm~1.0mm Screwv Outer Dia. 1.4~1.8mm Screw Length 2.2 ~5.0mm | Software for case management and surgery planning | Diagnostic Models in clear resin | PEEK implant |
| Implant configuration | Single or multi-piece | Single or multi-piece | Not publicly available | Plates and screws | NA | NA | Single |
| Compatible with DISRP software? | Yes | NA | NA | NA | Yes | Yes | NA |
{16}
# 3. Performance data
The following non-clinical testing was conducted as a basis for the determination of substantial equivalence:
# Performance Data
Table 12. Overview of the Performance Data on the Subject Device
| Name | Test method | Conclusion |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Accuracy Testing | Scanning of a cranial plate and then comparing them versus the existing files | The manufacturing process did not affect the dimensional accuracy of the patient-specific cranial implants by TECHFIT Digital Surgery. These results indicate that our PEEK implants are fabricated with high accuracy independently of their shape and dimensions. The devices showed elevated consistency regarding the original design being truthful to the patient's anatomy. |
| Compatibility testing | Verifying compatibility between TECHFIT Patient-Specific Cranial Implants manufactured from PEEK (referred to below as TECHFIT Cranial Implants) and the JEIL Le Forte Neuro Plating System 0.6 - K141452 (referred to below as JEIL System). | The JEIL Le Forte Neuro Plating System 0.6 (K141452) is compatible with TECHFIT Patient-Specific Cranial Implants. Therefore, plates and screws from the JEIL Neuro Plating System 0.6 can be used for attaching TECHFIT Cranial Implants to the skull. |
| Adjustment test | Evaluate the proper adjustment of TECHFIT Patient-Specific Cranial Implants to the bone utilizing an anatomic model of the patient's cranial defect | TECHFIT Patient-Specific Cranial Implants allow a unique adjustment position to the patient's bone. |
| Software testing | Verifying the item parts for the software | The verification and validation components of the software have been thoroughly tested. |
| Mechanical testing | To evaluate the static tensile strength of TECHFIT Patient-Specific Cranial Implants | All specimens experienced elastic deformation within the narrow section |
| Mechanical testing | To test the static four point bending strength and verify the mechanical behavior of TECHFIT Patient-Specific Cranial Implants, manufactured from PEEK. | Testing was terminated after the construct failed to maintain load. Screws pulled from PEEK blocks more abruptly than other specimens |
{17}
Table 13 presents an overview of the tests conducted with the subject device.
Table 13. Biocompatibility Test Overview
| Test / Assessment Description | Test Report Conclusion |
| --- | --- |
| Cytotoxicity test (ISO 10993-5) | No cytotoxic effect |
| Sensitization test (ISO 10993-10) | No sensitizing properties |
| Irritation/intracutaneous reactivity test (ISO 10993-10 and ISO 10993-23) | No irritant properties |
| Hemolysis (ISO 10993-4) | No hemolysis effect |
| Acute systemic toxicity (ISO 10993-11) | No evidence of systemic toxicity |
| Material-Mediated Pyrogenicity (ISO 10993-11) | No pyrogenic properties |
| Chemical Characterization and risk assessment: ISO 10993-18 and ISO 10993-17 | Non-toxic |
| Subchronic systemic toxicity (ISO 10993-11) | Supported by chemical characterization and toxicological risk assessment |
| Chronic systemic toxicity (ISO 10993-11) | Supported by chemical characterization and toxicological risk assessment |
| Genotoxicity (ISO 10993-3) | Supported by chemical characterization and toxicological risk |
{18}
| | assessment |
| --- | --- |
| Carcinogenicity (ISO 10993-3) | Supported by chemical characterization and toxicological risk assessment |
| Implantation (ISO 10993-6) | Equivalent physical-chemical characterization of subject and reference device |
| Neurotoxicity (ASTM F2901-19) | Non- neurotoxicity |
## 4. Conclusion
Non-clinical tests demonstrate that the TECHFIT Patient-Specific Cranial system is substantially equivalent to the predicate device.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.