GO-PEN® is a reusable insulin pen intended for the self-injection of NovoLog® (U-100, insulin aspart for injection) available in 10 ml vials.
Device Story
GO-PEN® is a reusable, mechanical pen-injector for insulin delivery. User fills a disposable sterile reservoir with 1.3 mL of NovoLog® (U-100) from a 10 ml vial; reservoir is mounted onto a durable pen-shaped dosing unit. User dials dose (1-60 Units, 1U increments). Device uses standard luer lock needles (supplied separately). If reservoir empties during injection, device displays remaining dose on dial; user must replace reservoir to complete dose. Used in home/clinic settings by patients. Benefits include precise, repeatable insulin dosing via a reusable platform. Device design supports 3-day reservoir use at room temperature.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical data. Bench testing only. Performance verified per ISO 11608-1:2022 (dose accuracy, injection force, environmental preconditioning, life-cycle, leakage) and ISO 80369-7/20 (luer lock). Biocompatibility evaluated per ISO 10993-1:2018. Human factors testing confirmed critical tasks (filling, labeling, injecting) were performed without error.
Technological Characteristics
Mechanical pen-injector. Materials evaluated per ISO 10993-1:2018. Dose accuracy meets ISO 11608-1:2022. Features luer lock interface (ISO 80369-7/20). Reservoirs supplied sterile (E-Beam). Durable pen is non-sterile. Manual dose dialing mechanism. No software or electronics.
Indications for Use
Indicated for self-injection of NovoLog® (U-100, insulin aspart) from 10 ml vials in patients requiring insulin therapy.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A piston syringe is a device intended for medical purposes that consists of a calibrated hollow barrel and a movable plunger. At one end of the barrel there is a male connector (nozzle) for fitting the female connector (hub) of a hypodermic single lumen needle. The device is used to inject fluids into, or withdraw fluids from, the body.
{0}
FDA U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION
April 24, 2025
GO-Pen ApS
% Paige Sutton-Smith
Quality and Regulatory Affairs Manager
Veranex
5420 Wade Park Blvd, Suite 204
Raleigh, North Carolina 27607
Re: K250262
Trade/Device Name: GO-PEN®
Regulation Number: 21 CFR 880.5860
Regulation Name: Piston Syringe
Regulatory Class: Class II
Product Code: FMF
Dated: March 27, 2025
Received: March 27, 2025
Dear Paige Sutton-Smith:
We have reviewed your section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database available at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Additional information about changes that may require a new premarket notification are provided in the FDA guidance documents entitled "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99812/download) and "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Software Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99785/download).
U.S. Food & Drug Administration
10903 New Hampshire Avenue
Silver Spring, MD 20993
www.fda.gov
{1}
K250262 - Paige Sutton-Smith
Page 2
Your device is also subject to, among other requirements, the Quality System (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820), which includes, but is not limited to, 21 CFR 820.30, Design controls; 21 CFR 820.90, Nonconforming product; and 21 CFR 820.100, Corrective and preventive action. Please note that regardless of whether a change requires premarket review, the QS regulation requires device manufacturers to review and approve changes to device design and production (21 CFR 820.30 and 21 CFR 820.70) and document changes and approvals in the device master record (21 CFR 820.181).
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR Part 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reporting-combination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR Parts 1000-1050.
All medical devices, including Class I and unclassified devices and combination product device constituent parts are required to be in compliance with the final Unique Device Identification System rule ("UDI Rule"). The UDI Rule requires, among other things, that a device bear a unique device identifier (UDI) on its label and package (21 CFR 801.20(a)) unless an exception or alternative applies (21 CFR 801.20(b)) and that the dates on the device label be formatted in accordance with 21 CFR 801.18. The UDI Rule (21 CFR 830.300(a) and 830.320(b)) also requires that certain information be submitted to the Global Unique Device Identification Database (GUDID) (21 CFR Part 830 Subpart E). For additional information on these requirements, please see the UDI System webpage at https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance/unique-device-identification-system-udi-system.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reporting-mdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about medical devices and radiation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
{2}
K250262 - Paige Sutton-Smith
Page 3
Sincerely,
Shruti N. Mistry -S
Shruti Mistry
Assistant Director
DHT3C: Division of Drug Delivery and
General Hospital Devices, and
Human Factors
OHT3: Office of Gastrorenal, ObGyn,
General Hospital, and Urology Devices
Office of Product Evaluation and Quality
Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{3}
FORM FDA 3881 (8/23)
Page 1 of 1
PSC Publishing Services (301) 443-6740
EF
| DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Food and Drug Administration Indications for Use | Form Approved: OMB No. 0910-0120 Expiration Date: 07/31/2026 See PRA Statement below. |
| --- | --- |
| 510(k) Number (if known) K250262 | |
| Device Name GO-PEN® | |
| Indications for Use (Describe) GO-PEN® is a reusable insulin pen intended for the self-injection of NovoLog® (U-100, insulin aspart for injection) available in 10 ml vials. | |
| Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable) ☑ Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) ☐ Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C) | |
| CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED. | |
| This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.* | |
| The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to: Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov | |
| "An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number." | |
{4}
510(K) SUMMARY
PAGE 1 OF 6
# GO-PEN® 510(K) SUMMARY
## APPLICANT
GO-Pen ApS
Diplomvej 381
Lyngby, 2800
Denmark
Phone: +45 53 77 24 74
## CONTACT PERSON
Ole Nielsen
CEO
GO-Pen ApS
Phone: +45 53772474
## DATE PREPARED
April 18, 2025
## DEVICE INFORMATION
Trade Name: GO-PEN®
Generic/Common Name: Insulin Pen Injector
Classification: II
Regulation: 21 CFR 880.5860
Regulation Name: Piston Syringe
Product Code: FMF
## PREDICATE DEVICE(S)
HumaPen Savvio, (K160668)
## DEVICE DESCRIPTION
GO-PEN® is an assembly of a durable pen-shaped dosing unit with a special disposable sterile reservoir that fits into the dosing unit. The GO-PEN® device can only be used with NovoLog® U-100 insulin aspart for injection. The user is intended to fill up the disposable reservoir with 1.3 mL of insulin from a 10 ml vial and mount it on the dosing unit. The GO-PEN® device allows the user to set the desired dose from 1 to 60 Units in 1 Unit increments using the dial feature. Once the GO-PEN® disposable reservoir is filled, it can be used over a period of up to 3 days at room temperature (max. 30°C/86°F) for multiple injections of precise doses of insulin. When the reservoir is empty or the time has been exceeded, the reservoir must be discarded, and a new sterile reservoir is used for the next filling. GO-PEN® is used with standard single-use hypodermic needles with a luer lock which are supplied separately by the user.
{5}
510(K) SUMMARY
PAGE 2 OF 6
# INDICATIONS FOR USE
GO-PEN® is a reusable insulin pen intended for the self-injection of NovoLog® (U-100, insulin aspart for injection) available in 10 ml vials.
## COMPARISON OF TECHNOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS WITH THE PREDICATE DEVICE
| Device Name | GO-PEN® (Subject Device) | HumaPen Savvio (Predicate Device) | Rationale for Substantial Equivalence |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 510(k) Number | K250262 | K160668 | N/A |
| Company | GO-Pen ApS | Eli Lilly and Company, Inc. | N/A |
| Classification | 2 | 2 | Same |
| Product Code | FMF | FMF | Same |
| Indications for Use | GO-PEN® is a reusable insulin pen intended for the self-injection of NovoLog® (U-100, insulin aspart for injection) available in 10 ml vials. | HumaPen Savvio is a reusable insulin pen intended for the self-injection of HUMALOG® (U-100, insulin lispro for injection) available in 3 mL cartridges using disposable pen needles (sold separately). | The proposed and predicate devices are intended to be used with the same strength of fast-acting insulin, but a different kind of insulin and that is provided in a different format – the predicate device requires a pre-filled pen cartridge while the proposed device requires the user to fill a reservoir from a vial. The proposed device allows for the use of a different type of fast-acting insulin, NovoLog®. These differences do not affect substantial equivalence. Both devices deliver U-100 rapid-acting insulin via reusable pens with disposable needles. The proposed device uses insulin from a vial, while the predicate uses pre-filled cartridges. This difference in insulin loading is addressed in the design and usability documentation. Once filled, the devices operate similarly. Although the insulins differ by brand (NovoLog® vs. HUMALOG®), both are rapid-acting and functionally equivalent for self-injection. |
| Reusable device | Yes | Yes | Same |
| Prescription/Over-the-Counter | Rx only | Rx only | Same |
| Two-way dose dialing | Yes | Yes | Same |
{6}
510(K) SUMMARY
PAGE 3 OF 6
| Device Name | GO-PEN®
(Subject Device) | HumaPen Savvio
(Predicate Device) | Rationale for
Substantial Equivalence |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Insufficient Remaining Dose feature | The pen-injector will allow a user to dial a dose that is greater than what is remaining in the reservoir. Once the pen-injector has completed the delivery of the insulin available within the reservoir (i.e., empties the reservoir), the portion of the dose that was not injected will be displayed on the dose dial; that is, the dose dial will not return to “0” as it would if the entire dose was delivered. This remaining dose is to be administered after replacing the reservoir. | Patient cannot dial more than the deliverable amount of insulin remaining in the cartridge, prior to injection. | ISO 11608-1:2022, §5.6(k) lists four options for IRD features. The GO-PEN® uses method (4) while the HumaPen Savvio uses method (1). This difference does not impact substantial equivalence as both pens comply with the standard and provide methods of completing a dose when the pen does not contain sufficient insulin. |
| Cartridge Volume | 1.3 mL | 3 mL | The GO-PEN® device holds less insulin than the predicate device. This difference does not impact substantial equivalence as both users must refill when empty. |
| Mechanism | Mechanical pen-injector/needle-based injection system | Mechanical pen-injector/needle-based injection system | Same |
| Delivery Accuracy | Meets ISO 11608-1:2022 requirements | Meets ISO 11608-1:2014 requirements | Same. Performance testing of the HumaPen Savvio was performed in accordance with ISO 11608-1:2014. A newer version of the standard has been published which has no impact on the test methods or requirements. Testing performed in accordance with the 2022 version also meets the requirements of the 2014 version. |
| Dial Increments | 0.01 mL per increment providing one unit (1U) dose increments | 0.01 mL per increment providing one unit (1U) dose increments | Same |
| Maximum Delivered Dose | 60 Units | 60 Units | Same |
| Use Life | Durable Pen – 2 years in packaging; 3 years once use begins
Reservoir – 2 years in packaging; 3 days once filled
Pull-rod – 12 uses or approximately 3 months | 6 years | The GO-PEN® durable pen has a shorter use life than the predicate device which remains substantially equivalent as the use life difference does not impact the intended use or technological characteristics of the device. |
{7}
510(K) SUMMARY
PAGE 4 OF 6
| Device Name | GO-PEN®
(Subject Device) | HumaPen Savvio
(Predicate Device) | Rationale for
Substantial Equivalence |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Sterility | Reusable pen is not a sterile device
Empty Reservoirs – supplied sterilized with E-Beam | Reusable pen is not a sterile device
Reservoirs are sterile, drug filled cartridges | Same. The durable pen portions of both devices are not sterile. The GO-PEN® includes a sterile reservoir component, while the predicate requires sterile drug filled cartridges. Both require sterile needles. |
| Nonclinical Bench Testing/In Vitro Bench Testing | The device design has passed the dose accuracy requirements after preconditioning in the following conditions defined in ISO 11608-1:
- Standard Atmosphere
- Cool Atmosphere
- Warm Atmosphere
- Last-dose Accuracy
- Dry Heat
- Cold Storage
- Free Fall
- Vibration
- Damp Heat
- Temperature cycling (Cyclical)
- Life-cycle test (5 years)
- Transport Test
- Fluid Leakage (into dosing mechanism) test
- Leakage (during injection) test | The device design has passed the dose accuracy requirements after preconditioning in the following conditions defined in ISO 11608-1:
- Standard Atmosphere
- Cool Atmosphere
- Warm Atmosphere
- Last-dose Accuracy
- Dry Heat
- Cold Storage
- Free Fall
- Vibration
- Damp Heat
- Temperature cycling (Cyclical)
- Life-cycle test (9 years)
- Transport test | Same, with the exception of the life-cycle test which has been completed for the GO-PEN® device for a shorter life-cycle than the predicate device. |
| Biocompatibility Testing | The durable pen portion of the GO-PEN® device is a surface contacting device that contacts intact skin only according to the definitions in ISO 10993.1:2018 and the exterior materials of the durable pen were tested accordingly and evaluated for in-vitro cytotoxicity. The materials excluded from Attachment G of the FDA biocompatibility guideline have also been evaluated for biocompatibility.
The reservoir potion of the GO-PEN® is externally communicating device according to the definitions | The HumaPen Savvio is a surface contacting device that contacts intact skin only according to the definitions in ISO 10993-1:2009 Biological evaluation of medical devices – Part 1: Evaluation and testing within a risk management process. The exterior materials of the device (including the cartridge holder) were evaluated for in vitro cytotoxicity, skin irritation, and sensitization in accordance with this standard and meet the biocompatibility standard. | The GO-PEN® required more evaluation due to the included reservoir. However, both devices met the applicable ISO 10993 requirements. |
{8}
510(K) SUMMARY
PAGE 5 OF 6
| Device Name | GO-PEN®
(Subject Device) | HumaPen Savvio
(Predicate Device) | Rationale for
Substantial Equivalence |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | in ISO 10993-1:2018 due to the storage of insulin and therefore the materials of construction evaluated for in-vitro cytotoxicity, skin irritation, material mediated pyrogenicity and sensitization in according with this standard. | | |
| Usability Testing | Human factors testing confirmed that all critical tasks related to filling reservoirs with insulin and labelling them were passed without any mistakes. Other tasks related to filling, injecting and handling the device were passed, confirming that the user interface of the device did not adversely impact performance or usability of the device. | Human factors testing confirmed that the user interface of the device did not adversely impact performance or usability of the device. | The GO-PEN® required additional human factors testing due to the extra reservoir filling tasks, which were confirmed to not adversely impact the performance or usability of the device. All equivalent tasks of GO-PEN® and predicate device are equal in terms of overlapping functions, namely: injecting and handling. |
| Luer Testing | The device design has passed the luer lock testing requirements after preconditioning in the following conditions defined in ISO 80369-7 and 80369-20:
- Dimensions
- Fluid leakage
- Sub-atmospheric pressure leakage
- Stress cracking
- Resistance to separation from axial load
- Resistance to separation from unscrewing
- Resistance to overriding | N/A - HumaPen Savvio does not include a luer feature. | The GO-PEN® features a standard luer, whereas the predicate device does not include this feature. The GO-PEN® testing was conducted to meet current requirements for the luer feature. |
## SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE
The indications for use for the predicate device are substantially equivalent to the proposed indications for use for the GO-PEN®. Any differences in the technological characteristics between the devices do not raise any different questions of substantial equivalence. Thus, the GO-PEN® is substantially equivalent to the predicate device.
{9}
510(K) SUMMARY
PAGE 6 OF 6
# PERFORMANCE DATA
All necessary bench testing was conducted on the GO-PEN® to support a determination of substantial equivalence to the predicate device.
## Nonclinical Testing Summary:
GO-PEN® meets the requirements specified in ISO 11608-1:2022 Needle-based injection systems for medical use – Requirements and test methods – Part 1: Needle-based injection systems. FDA guidance Technical Considerations for Pen, Jet, and Related Injectors Intended for Use with Drugs and Biological Products was also considered to guide the nonclinical testing. The device design has passed the dose accuracy requirements after preconditioning in the conditions specific below as defined in the ISO 11608-1 standard.
The nonclinical bench testing included:
- Dose accuracy and Injection force
- At Cool, standard, warm atmosphere
- After Free fall preconditioning
- After Dry heat preconditioning
- After Cold storage preconditioning
- After Damp heat preconditioning
- After Cyclical preconditioning
- After Vibration preconditioning
- After In-Use lifetime test preconditioning
- After Simulated Transport preconditioning
- After Aging to Expiration (Functional Stability)
- Last dose accuracy
- Fluid leakage test
- Leakage
- Visible particles in reservoir
- Break loose and Glide force
- Usability
- Drug compatibility
- Luer testing
The collective results of the nonclinical testing demonstrate that the materials chosen, the manufacturing processes, and design of the GO-PEN® meet the established specifications necessary for consistent performance during its intended use. In addition, the collective bench testing demonstrates that the GO-PEN® does not raise different questions of safety or effectiveness for administering insulin when compared to the predicate devices.
## Clinical Testing Summary:
No clinical testing was performed.
# CONCLUSIONS
The conclusions drawn from the nonclinical tests demonstrate that the subject device is substantially equivalent to the predicate device.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.