Polyvinyl Alcohol Embolic Microspheres are intended to be used for the embolization of arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) and hypervascular tumors, including uterine fibroids.
Device Story
Polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) embolic microspheres; compressible hydrogel; non-resorbable. Supplied in 0.9% sodium chloride solution in glass vials. Used by interventional radiologists/physicians during catheter-based procedures under fluoroscopic visualization. Microspheres mixed with non-ionic contrast media prior to injection. Device injected via catheter into target vasculature to occlude blood flow to AVMs or hypervascular tumors. Mechanical occlusion reduces blood supply to target tissue; provides therapeutic benefit by shrinking tumors or treating malformations. Available in various calibrated sizes (75-1200μm) to match vessel diameter.
Clinical Evidence
No human clinical data. Evidence includes bench performance testing (size, compressibility, deliverability, pH, sterility, packaging integrity) and biocompatibility (ISO 10993). Animal study (renal artery embolization in swine) evaluated safety/efficacy via hematology, imaging, and histopathology, demonstrating performance comparable to predicate.
Indicated for embolization of arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) and hypervascular tumors, including uterine fibroids, in patients requiring vascular occlusion.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A vascular embolization device is an intravascular implant intended to control hemorrhaging due to aneurysms, certain types of tumors (e.g., nephroma, hepatoma, uterine fibroids), and arteriovenous malformations. This does not include cyanoacrylates and other embolic agents, which act by polymerization or precipitation. Embolization devices used in neurovascular applications are also not included in this classification, see § 882.5950 of this chapter.
Special Controls
*Classification.* Class II (special controls.) The special control for this device is the FDA guidance document entitled “Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Vascular and Neurovascular Embolization Devices.” For availability of this guidance document, see § 870.1(e).
{0}
FDA U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION
September 23, 2025
Canyon Medical Inc.
Huiqi Jiang
RA Manager
Building 3, Phase 2 Accelerator, No. 11 Yaogu Avenue,
Jiangbei New Area
Nanjing, Jiangsu 210032
CHINA
Re: K250209
Trade/Device Name: Polyvinyl Alcohol Embolic Microspheres
Regulation Number: 21 CFR 870.3300
Regulation Name: Vascular Embolization Device
Regulatory Class: II
Product Code: KRD, NAJ
Dated: August 21, 2025
Received: August 22, 2025
Dear Huiqi Jiang:
We have reviewed your section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database available at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
U.S. Food & Drug Administration
10903 New Hampshire Avenue
Silver Spring, MD 20993
www.fda.gov
{1}
K250209 - Huiqi Jiang
Page 2
Additional information about changes that may require a new premarket notification are provided in the FDA guidance documents entitled "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99812/download) and "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Software Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99785/download).
Your device is also subject to, among other requirements, the Quality System (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820), which includes, but is not limited to, 21 CFR 820.30, Design controls; 21 CFR 820.90, Nonconforming product; and 21 CFR 820.100, Corrective and preventive action. Please note that regardless of whether a change requires premarket review, the QS regulation requires device manufacturers to review and approve changes to device design and production (21 CFR 820.30 and 21 CFR 820.70) and document changes and approvals in the device master record (21 CFR 820.181).
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR Part 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reporting-combination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR Parts 1000-1050.
All medical devices, including Class I and unclassified devices and combination product device constituent parts are required to be in compliance with the final Unique Device Identification System rule ("UDI Rule"). The UDI Rule requires, among other things, that a device bear a unique device identifier (UDI) on its label and package (21 CFR 801.20(a)) unless an exception or alternative applies (21 CFR 801.20(b)) and that the dates on the device label be formatted in accordance with 21 CFR 801.18. The UDI Rule (21 CFR 830.300(a) and 830.320(b)) also requires that certain information be submitted to the Global Unique Device Identification Database (GUDID) (21 CFR Part 830 Subpart E). For additional information on these requirements, please see the UDI System webpage at https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance/unique-device-identification-system-udi-system.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reporting-mdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about medical devices and radiation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-
{2}
K250209 - Huiqi Jiang
Page 3
assistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
Jason Roberts -S
Jason R. Roberts, Ph.D.
Assistant Director
DHT3B: Division of Reproductive, Gynecology, and Urology Devices
OHT3: Office of Gastrorenal, ObGyn, General Hospital, and Urology Devices
Office of Product Evaluation and Quality
Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{3}
FORM FDA 3881 (8/23)
Page 1 of 1
PBC Publishing Services (301) 443-0740
EF
| DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Food and Drug Administration Indications for Use | Form Approved: OMB No. 0910-0120 Expiration Date: 07/31/2026 See PRA Statement below. |
| --- | --- |
| 510(k) Number (if known) K250209 | |
| Device Name Polyvinyl Alcohol Embolic Microspheres | |
| Indications for Use (Describe) Polyvinyl Alcohol Embolic Microspheres are intended to be used for the embolization of arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) and hypervascular tumors, including uterine fibroids. | |
| Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable) ☑ Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) ☐ Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C) | |
| CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED. | |
| This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.* | |
| The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to: Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov | |
| "An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number." | |
{4}
K250209
Page 1 of 8
# 510(k) Summary
# Polyvinyl Alcohol Embolic Microspheres
## 1. 510(k) Owner
Canyon Medical Inc.
## 2. Submission Correspondent
Submitter Name: Canyon Medical Inc.
Address: Building 3, Phase 2 Accelerator, No. 11 Yaogu Avenue, Jiangbei New Area, 210032, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, People's Republic of China
Official Correspondent: Ms. Huiqi Jiang
Position: RA Manager
E-mail: jhq@canyonmedical.com.cn
Telephone: +86-13241196637
## 3. Date of Preparation: August 22, 2025
## 4. Subject Device(s) Information
| Common Name: | Polyvinyl Alcohol Embolic Microspheres |
| --- | --- |
| Trade Name: | Polyvinyl Alcohol Embolic Microspheres |
| Regulation Number: | 21 CFR 870.3300 |
| Classification Name: | Vascular embolization device |
| Device Class: | II |
| Product Code: | KRD, NAJ |
## 5. Predicate Device(s) Information
| Manufacturer: | Suzhou Hengrui Callisyn Biomedical Co., Ltd. |
| --- | --- |
| 510(K) Number: | K173871 |
| Trade Name: | CalliSpheres Embolic Microspheres, 8Spheres Embolic Microspheres |
| Regulation Number: | 21 CFR 870.3300 |
| Classification Name: | Vascular Embolization Device |
| Device Class: | II |
| Product Code: | KRD, NAJ |
The predicate device has not been subject to a design related recall.
## 6. Device Description
The subject device polyvinyl alcohol embolic microspheres are compressible hydrogel microspheres with a regular shape, smooth surface, and calibrated size, which are formed as a result
{5}
K250209
Page 2 of 8
of chemical modification on polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) materials. The embolic microspheres consist of a macromer derived from polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) and are hydrophilic, non-resorbable. The preservation solution is 0.9% sodium chloride solution.
The polyvinyl alcohol embolic microspheres available in dyed (blue) and clear (undyed with natural color). The subject device available in particle sizes from 75-1200μm and supplied sterile in sterile sealed glass vials which contain 1 mL, 2 mL, or 3 mL of microspheres suspended in 7mL, 7mL, or 6 mL of 0.9% sodium chloride solution, respectively. The subject device configurations are provided in Table 1 below.
Table 1. Device configuration
| No. | Product Code | Dye Color | Calibrated Size (μm) | Size range (μm) | Quantity (embolic microspheres/0.9% sodium chloride solution) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | PB-101 | Blue | 110 | 75~150 | 1mL/7mL |
| 2 | PB-102 | | | | 2mL/7mL |
| 3 | PB-103 | | | | 3mL/6mL |
| 4 | PB-201 | | 200 | 100~300 | 1mL/7mL |
| 5 | PB-202 | | | | 2mL/7mL |
| 6 | PB-203 | | | | 3mL/6mL |
| 7 | PB-401 | | 400 | 300~500 | 1mL/7mL |
| 8 | PB-402 | | | | 2mL/7mL |
| 9 | PB-403 | | | | 3mL/6mL |
| 10 | PB-601 | | 600 | 500~700 | 1mL/7mL |
| 11 | PB-602 | | | | 2mL/7mL |
| 12 | PB-603 | | | | 3mL/6mL |
| 13 | PB-801 | | 800 | 700~900 | 1mL/7mL |
| 14 | PB-802 | | | | 2mL/7mL |
| 15 | PB-803 | | | | 3mL/6mL |
| 16 | PB-1051 | | 1050 | 900~1200 | 1mL/7mL |
| 17 | PB-1052 | | | | 2mL/7mL |
| 18 | PB-1053 | | | | 3mL/6mL |
| 19 | PW-101 | Colorless | 110 | 75~150 | 1mL/7mL |
| 20 | PW-102 | | | | 2mL/7mL |
| 21 | PW-103 | | | | 3mL/6mL |
| 22 | PW-201 | | 200 | 100~300 | 1mL/7mL |
| 23 | PW-202 | | | | 2mL/7mL |
| 24 | PW-203 | | | | 3mL/6mL |
| 25 | PW-401 | | 400 | 300~500 | 1mL/7mL |
| 26 | PW-402 | | | | 2mL/7mL |
| 27 | PW-403 | | | | 3mL/6mL |
| 28 | PW-601 | | 600 | 500~700 | 1mL/7mL |
| 29 | PW-602 | | | | 2mL/7mL |
{6}
K250209
Page 3 of 8
| No. | Product Code | Dye Color | Calibrated Size (μm) | Size range (μm) | Quantity (embolic microspheres/0.9% sodium chloride solution) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 30 | PW-603 | | | | 3mL/6mL |
| 31 | PW-801 | | 800 | 700~900 | 1mL/7mL |
| 32 | PW-802 | | | | 2mL/7mL |
| 33 | PW-803 | | | | 3mL/6mL |
| 34 | PW-1051 | | 1050 | 900~1200 | 1mL/7mL |
| 35 | PW-1052 | | | | 2mL/7mL |
| 36 | PW-1053 | | | | 3mL/6mL |
| Size (μm) | Indication – Hypervascular Tumors/ Arteriovenous Malformations | Indication-Uterine Fibroid |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 75~150 | Yes | No |
| 100~300 | Yes | No |
| 300~500 | Yes | No |
| 500~700 | Yes | Yes |
| 700~900 | Yes | Yes |
| 900~1200 | Yes | Yes |
## 7. Indications for Use
Polyvinyl Alcohol Embolic Microspheres are intended to be used for the embolization of arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) and hypervascular tumors, including uterine fibroids.
## 8. Summary and Comparison of Technological Characteristics
Equivalence comparison has been identified with following summary of technical characteristics:
Table 2. Technological Characteristic Comparison Table
| Device Characteristic | Subject Device: Polyvinyl Alcohol Embolic Microspheres | Predicate Device: CalliSpheres and 8Spheres Embolic Microspheres |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 510(k) Number | K250209 | K173871 |
| Classification | II | II |
| Product Code | KRD, NAJ | KRD, NAJ |
{7}
K250209
Page 4 of 8
| Device Characteristic | Subject Device: Polyvinyl Alcohol Embolic Microspheres | Predicate Device: CalliSpheres and 8Spheres Embolic Microspheres |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Regulation Number | 21CFR 870.3300 | 21CFR 870.3300 |
| Intended Use/ Indication for Use | Intended to be used for the embolization of arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) and hypervascular tumors, including uterine fibroids. | Intended to be used for the embolization of arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) and hypervascular tumors, including uterine fibroids. |
| Polymerization Method | Suspension polymerization | Suspension polymerization |
| Resorption | Non-resorbable | Non-resorbable |
| Appearance | Hydrogel microspheres with regular shape, smooth surface and calibrated size, Blue dyed or undyed | Hydrogel microspheres with regular shape, smooth surface and calibrated size. CalliSpheres: Blue dyed 8Spheres: Undyed |
| Microsphere Polymer Composition | Polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) | Polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) |
| Storage media | 0.9% sodium chloride solution | 0.9% sodium chloride solution |
| Size Range | Size range: 75-1200μm
Labeled size range: 75-150μm
100-300μm
300-500μm
500-700μm
700-900μm
900-1200μm | Size range: 100-1200μm
Labeled size range: 100-300μm
300-500μm
500-700μm
700-900μm
900-1200μm |
| Quantity (embolic microspheres/0.9% sodium chloride solution) | 1mL/7mL
2mL/7mL
3mL/6mL | 1mL/7mL
2mL/7mL |
| Packaging | Sealed in borosilicate glass vial | Sealed in borosilicate glass vial |
| Compressibility | 50% by diameter | 30% by diameter |
| Compatible Delivery Catheter | 1.7-4.0Fr | 1.7-4.0Fr |
| Radiopacity Method | Mixed with non-ionic contrast media prior to injection | Mixed with non-ionic contrast media prior to injection |
4
{8}
K250209
Page 5 of 8
| Device Characteristic | Subject Device: Polyvinyl Alcohol Embolic Microspheres | Predicate Device: CalliSpheres and 8Spheres Embolic Microspheres |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Delivery Method | Via catheter under fluoroscopic visualization | Via catheter under fluoroscopic visualization |
| Method of Supply | Sterile and single use | Sterile and single use |
| Sterilization | Moist heat and non-pyrogenic | Moist heat and non-pyrogenic |
| Shelf Life | Three years | Two years |
The technological characteristics of the subject device are similar to those of predicate devices. The minimum particle size for the predicate device (100μm) is larger than the minimum particle size for the subject device (75μm). However, smaller sized microspheres have been cleared for similar indications, and has the same basic design as the predicate device. The comparison between the subject and predicate devices is based on the following:
- Same indications for use
- Same fundamental technology
The differences in the particle sizes does not raise different questions of safety and effectiveness.
## 9. Non-Clinical Test Summary
The device is subject to Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff - Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Vascular and Neurovascular Embolization Devices issued on 29 December 2004. The safety and effectiveness have been evaluated by non-clinical performance testing including:
### Performance Testing
The following specifications and performance testing were evaluated on the subject device, and all tests were passed and demonstrated the subject devices can meet the product requirements.
- Appearance
- Quantity
- Microsphere Size
- Compressibility
- Catheter deliverability
- Suspension
- Water content per USP-NF 2025 <731> Loss on drying
- pH per USP-NF 2025 <791>
- Impurities and Residual Solvents
- Sterility per USP-NF 2025 <71>
- Bacterial Endotoxins per USP-NF 2025 <85>
- Packaging integrity
- Transportation
- Shelf life
### Biocompatibility Evaluation
Biocompatibility testing for the subject device was conducted in accordance with FDA guidance,
{9}
K250209
Page 6 of 8
Use of International Standard ISO 10993-1, "Biological evaluation of medical devices - Part 1: Evaluation and testing within a risk management process". Biocompatibility tests were completed, and the results demonstrate the subject device is biocompatible.
Table 3. Biocompatibility Evaluation Table
| Biological Endpoint | Test Method | Results |
| --- | --- | --- |
| MTT Cytotoxicity Test | ISO 10993-5:2009 | Non-cytotoxic |
| ISO Guinea Pig Maximization Sensitization Test | ISO 10993-10:2021 | Non-sensitizer |
| ISO Intracutaneous Study in Rabbits | ISO 10993-10:2010 | Non-irritant |
| ISO Acute Systemic Toxicity Study in Mice | ISO 10993-11:2017 | No mortality or evidence of systemic toxicity |
| ASTM Hemolysis Study | ISO 10993-4:2017 | Non-hemolytic |
| USP Rabbit Pyrogen Study, Material Mediated | ISO 10993-11:2021 | Non-pyrogenic |
| ISO Muscle Implantation Study in Rabbits, 1 Week | ISO 10993-6:2016 | The macroscopic reaction was not significant as compared to the negative control article.
Microscopically, the test article caused a minimal to no reaction as compared to the negative control article. |
| ISO Muscle Implantation Study in Rabbits, 4 Weeks | ISO 10993-6:2016 | The macroscopic reaction was not significant as compared to the negative control article.
Microscopically, the test article caused a minimal to no reaction as compared to the negative control article. |
6
{10}
K250209
Page 7 of 8
| ISO Muscle Implantation Study in Rabbits, 13 Weeks | ISO 10993-6:2016 | The macroscopic reaction was not significant as compared to the negative control article. Microscopically, the test article caused a minimal reaction as compared to the negative control article. |
| --- | --- | --- |
## Chemical Characterization and Toxicological Risk Assessment
Chemical characterization testing was conducted on the subject device Polyvinyl Alcohol Embolic Microspheres in accordance with ISO 10993-18:2022. A Toxicological risk assessment in accordance with ISO 10993-17:2023, using a worst-case risk assessment approach was conducted based upon the findings of the exhaustive extraction. Using this approach, it was determined that the margins of safety (MOS) for potential chemical exposures indicated a low risk of chronic toxicity and carcinogenicity.
## Sterility, Shipping, and Shelf-life
The proposed device is sterilized by moist heat steam which under validated parameters (121°C, 20 minutes) after sealing the vials to achieve a sterility assurance level (SAL) of 10⁻⁶ in accordance with USP <71> and ISO 17665:2015. Bacterial Endotoxin Levels were below the level of 0.5 EU/ml in accordance with USP <85>. Both baseline and accelerated shelf life testing were conducted demonstrating the device will perform as intended to support the proposed 3 year shelf-life.
- Package integrity test – after environmental conditioning, simulated transportation testing in accordance to ASTM D4169-22 on final, packaged, and sterile device.
- Sterile Barrier Packaging performed on the proposed device:
- Dye penetration ASTM F1929-15
- Shelf-life of 3-years is validated using FDA recognized standard ASTM F1980 -21 Standard Guide for Accelerated Aging of Sterile Barrier Systems for Medical Devices.
## Animal Study Testing
This animal study simulated the clinical use of polyvinyl alcohol embolization microspheres and performed partial renal artery embolization of healthy white swine through interventional surgery. The effectiveness evaluated by observing the performance of the intra-operative procedures, the parameters of the embolized vessel, and the embolization effect in the immediate and test periods. The safety and efficacy of the test article were initially evaluated by observing the overall recovery of the animals after the operation, and by combining hematological tests (blood coagulation and serum biochemistry, etc.), imaging changes in the kidneys, clinicopathology, gross anatomical observations, and histopathological manifestations of the embolized localities and the major organs of the whole body at multiple time points before and after the operation. The results demonstrate that the subject device is as safe and effective as the cleared Polyvinyl Alcohol Embolic
{11}
K250209
Page 8 of 8
Microspheres (K173871).
## 10. Conclusion
The conclusions drawn from the comparison, analysis, and nonclinical testing above demonstrate that the proposed subject devices raise no new questions of safety or effectiveness, and are as safe, as effective, and perform as well as the legally marketed predicate devices for proposed indications for use.
8
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.