The SureAx-Guide™ guidewire is indicated for use in facilitating delivery of percutaneous catheters into the peripheral vasculature. The SureAx-Guide™ guidewire is not intended for use in the coronary or neuro vasculature.
Device Story
SureAx-Guide™ is a stainless-steel guidewire with PTFE hydrophobic proximal coating and PVP-based hydrophilic distal coating; features distal coils and soldered tip. Used to facilitate percutaneous catheter delivery into peripheral vasculature. Operated by clinicians in clinical settings. Device provides mechanical support and trackability for catheter navigation. Radiopaque tip allows visualization under fluoroscopy. Single-use, sterile, gamma-sterilized. Benefits include improved catheter placement accuracy and reduced friction during navigation.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. No clinical data. Testing included biocompatibility (ISO 10993), sterilization validation (SAL 10^-6), shelf-life (ASTM F1980), packaging integrity (ASTM D4332/D4169), radiopacity (ASTM F640), and mechanical performance (trackability, torqueability, kink resistance, tensile strength, coating durability). All tests met acceptance criteria.
Indicated for facilitating delivery of percutaneous catheters into the peripheral vasculature. Not for use in coronary or neuro vasculature.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A catheter guide wire is a coiled wire that is designed to fit inside a percutaneous catheter for the purpose of directing the catheter through a blood vessel.
Special Controls
*Classification.* Class II (special controls). The device, when it is a torque device that is manually operated, non-patient contacting, and intended to manipulate non-cerebral vascular guide wires, is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 870.9.
{0}
FDA U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION
October 17, 2025
SureAx Medical, LLC
Natalie Eagleburger
SureAx Regulatory Consultant
Starlight Medical Consulting
203 Providence Falls Trl
Hurdle Mills, North Carolina 27541
Re: K250203
Trade/Device Name: SureAx-Guide™ Guidewire
Regulation Number: 21 CFR 870.1330
Regulation Name: Catheter Guide Wire
Regulatory Class: Class II
Product Code: DQX
Dated: September 19, 2025
Received: September 19, 2025
Dear Natalie Eagleburger:
We have reviewed your section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database available at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Additional information about changes that may require a new premarket notification are provided in the FDA guidance documents entitled "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Change to an Existing Device"
U.S. Food & Drug Administration
10903 New Hampshire Avenue
Silver Spring, MD 20993
www.fda.gov
{1}
K250203 - Natalie Eagleburger
Page 2
(https://www.fda.gov/media/99812/download) and "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Software Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99785/download).
Your device is also subject to, among other requirements, the Quality System (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820), which includes, but is not limited to, 21 CFR 820.30, Design controls; 21 CFR 820.90, Nonconforming product; and 21 CFR 820.100, Corrective and preventive action. Please note that regardless of whether a change requires premarket review, the QS regulation requires device manufacturers to review and approve changes to device design and production (21 CFR 820.30 and 21 CFR 820.70) and document changes and approvals in the device master record (21 CFR 820.181).
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR Part 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reporting-combination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR Parts 1000-1050.
All medical devices, including Class I and unclassified devices and combination product device constituent parts are required to be in compliance with the final Unique Device Identification System rule ("UDI Rule"). The UDI Rule requires, among other things, that a device bear a unique device identifier (UDI) on its label and package (21 CFR 801.20(a)) unless an exception or alternative applies (21 CFR 801.20(b)) and that the dates on the device label be formatted in accordance with 21 CFR 801.18. The UDI Rule (21 CFR 830.300(a) and 830.320(b)) also requires that certain information be submitted to the Global Unique Device Identification Database (GUDID) (21 CFR Part 830 Subpart E). For additional information on these requirements, please see the UDI System webpage at https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance/unique-device-identification-system-udi-system.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reporting-mdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about medical devices and radiation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
{2}
K250203 - Natalie Eagleburger
Page 3
Sincerely,
Jenny R. Katsnelson -S
for Lydia Glaw
Assistant Director
DHT2C: Division of Coronary and Peripheral Intervention Devices
OHT2: Office of Cardiovascular Devices
Office of Product Evaluation and Quality
Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
Digitally signed by Jenny R. Katsnelson -S
Date: 2025.10.17 16:14:41 -04'00'
{3}
FORM FDA 3881 (8/23)
Page 1 of 1
PSC Publishing Services (301) 443-6740
EF
| DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Food and Drug Administration Indications for Use | Form Approved: OMB No. 0910-0120 Expiration Date: 07/31/2026 See PRA Statement below. |
| --- | --- |
| 510(k) Number (if known) K250203 | |
| Device Name SureAx-Guide Guidewire | |
| Indications for Use (Describe) The SureAx-Guide guidewire is indicated for use in facilitating delivery of percutaneous catheters into the peripheral vasculature. The SureAx-Guide guidewire is not intended for use in the coronary or neuro vasculature. | |
| Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable) ☑ Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) ☐ Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C) | |
| CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED. | |
| This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.* | |
| The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to: Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov | |
| "An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number." | |
{4}
K250203
Page 1 of 4
510(k) SUMMARY
K250203
SureAx-GUIDE™ Guidewire
Traditional 510(k)
I. SUBMITTER
SureAx Medical™ LLC
11107 Roselle St.,
San Diego, CA 92121 USA
Phone: 858-249-7402
Contact Person: Ricardo Villanueva
Date Prepared: September 19, 2025
II. DEVICE
Trade Name: SureAx-Guide™ Guidewire
Common or Usual Name: Wire, Guide, Catheter
Classification Name: Catheter guide wire
Regulatory Class: Class II
Product Code and Regulation: DQX, 21 CFR 870.1330
III. PREDICATE DEVICE
Primary Predicate
COOK Inc- Approach Hydro ST Guidewire (K091385)
IV. DEVICE DESCRIPTION
The SureAx-Guide™ guidewire is comprised of a stainless-steel wire with a PTFE coating and distal coils and soldered tip. The distal end has a urethane sheath and PVP-based hydrophilic coating. The maximum outside diameter is 0.0142 inches and it will be available in 135cm and 190cm lengths. It will be supplied sterile and intended for single use.
Page 1 of 4
{5}
K250203
Page 2 of 4
# V. INDICATIONS FOR USE
The SureAx-Guide™ guidewire is indicated for use in facilitating delivery of percutaneous catheters into the peripheral vasculature. The SureAx-Guide™ guidewire is not intended for use in the coronary or neuro vasculature.
A comparison of the indications for use of the proposed device and the predicate device is provided in the table below:
| Characteristic | Subject Device
SureAx-Guide™ Guidewire | Predicate Device
Approach Hydro ST Guidewire
(K091385) | Equivalence Comparison |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Indications for Use | The SureAx-Guide™ guidewire is indicated for use in facilitating delivery of percutaneous catheters into the peripheral vasculature. The SureAx-Guide™ guidewire is not intended for use in the coronary or neuro vasculature. | The Approach Hydro ST Guidewire is indicated for use in facilitating delivery of percutaneous catheters into the peripheral vasculature. | Equivalent |
# VI. COMPARISON OF TECHNOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS WITH THE PREDICATE DEVICE
The design of the SureAx-Guide Guidewire and the predicate Approach Hydro ST Guidewire are the same in materials, coatings, critical dimensions, and sterility assurance level. The key technological difference is that the SureAx Guide Guidewire is sterilized via radiation (gamma) while the predicate is sterilized via Ethylene Oxide. The results from preclinical evaluations and performance bench testing demonstrate that the SureAx-Guide's technological and performance characteristics meet defined design requirements and can perform in a manner equivalent to the predicate for its intended use. Performance data demonstrates the SureAx-Guide performs as intended and is substantially equivalent to its predicate.
A comparison of the technological characteristics of the subject device and the predicate device is provided in the table below:
| Characteristic | Subject Device
SureAx-Guide™ Guidewire | Predicate Device
Approach Hydro ST Guidewire
(K091385) | Equivalence Comparison |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Trade Name | SureAx-Guide | Approach Hydro ST Guidewire | N/A |
| Product Code | DQX | DQX | Same |
| Regulation Number | 21 CFR 870.1330 | 21 CFR 870.1330 | Same |
| Regulatory Class | II | II | Same |
| Nominal Wire Outer Diameter | 0.014" | 0.014" | Same |
| Overall Length | 135, 190cm | 135, 190, 300cm | Same |
| Tip Length | 13.5cm | 13.5cm | Same |
| Tip Shape | Straight | Straight | Same |
| Wire material | Stainless steel | Stainless steel | Same |
| Coating(s) | • Proximal: PTFE hydrophobic
• Distal: PVP-based hydrophilic | • Proximal: PTFE hydrophobic
• Distal: PVP-based hydrophilic | Same |
| Tip Material | Stainless steel and platinum/nitinol | Stainless steel and platinum/nitinol | Same |
| Accessories | None | None | Same |
| Packaging Configuration | • Hooped guidewire within sterile barrier pouch
• Unit box | • Hooped guidewire within sterile barrier pouch
• Unit box | Same |
| Sterilization | Single use
Provided sterile via radiation (gamma) to SAL 10^{-6} | Single Use
Provided sterile via Ethylene Oxide to SAL 10^{-6} | Equivalent |
| Shelf Life | 2 years | 2 years | Same |
# VII. PERFORMANCE DATA
The following performance data were provided in support of the substantial equivalence determination.
Preclinical tests were conducted on the SureAx-Guide Guidewire to demonstrate that it meets defined
Page 2 of 4
{6}
K250203
Page 3 of 4
design requirements and can perform in a manner equivalent to its predicate. Testing included comparative bench and preclinical testing per relevant recognized consensus standards where applicable and as defined in the table below. The design, testing, and technical information provided for the SureAx-Guide Guidewire also comply with applicable standards and recommendations for its product code as defined in:
- Recognized Consensus Standard: 3-172 AAMI TIR42:2021 Evaluation of Particulates Associated with Vascular Medical Devices.
- FDA Guidance Document: Intravascular Catheters, Wires, and Delivery Systems with Lubricious Coatings – Labeling Considerations (issued 10 October 2019).
- FDA Guidance Document: Coronary, Peripheral, and Neurovascular Guidewires – Performance Tests and Recommended Labeling (issued October 10, 2019).
The table below summarizes the performance testing conducted.
| Test | Reference Standards OR Test Method Summary | Results and Conclusions |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Biocompatibility per ISO 10993-1 for an external communicating device, limited (<24 hour) direct blood contacting device. | Cytotoxicity per ISO 10993-5 | All results met acceptance criteria and demonstrate the SureAx-Guide is non-cytotoxic. |
| | Sensitization per ISO 10993-10 | All results met acceptance criteria and demonstrate the SureAx-Guide is a non-sensitizer. |
| | Intracutaneous reactivity per ISO 10993-23 | All results met acceptance criteria and demonstrate the SureAx-Guide is a non-irritant. |
| | Systemic toxicity per ISO 10993-11 | All results met acceptance criteria and demonstrate the SureAx-Guide is non-toxic. |
| | Sc5b-9 complement activation per ISO 10993-4 | All results met acceptance criteria and demonstrate the SureAx-Guide is not an activator. |
| | Direct and indirect hemolysis per ISO 10993-4 | All results met acceptance criteria and demonstrate the SureAx-Guide is non-hemolytic. |
| | Thrombogenicity studies, including Phospholipid Platelet Test (PTT) and Platelet Leukocyte Test (PLC), per ISO 10993-4 | All results met acceptance criteria and demonstrate the SureAx-Guide is thromboresistant. |
| Sterilization | Evaluated per ANSI/AAMI/ISO 11137-1 including establishing the sterility assurance level (SAL) and evaluating bioburden | Terminal sterilization validation testing supports a 10^{-6} SAL, equivalent to that of the predicate device. |
| Pyrogenicity / Endotoxin | Material-mediated pyrogenicity (USP rabbit pyrogen test) per ISO 10993-11 and limulus amebocyte lysate (LAL) evaluation | All results met acceptance criteria and demonstrate the SureAx-Guide is non-pyrogenic. |
| Packaging | Sterile barrier and labeling performance evaluation following simulated environmental conditioning per ASTM D4332 and distribution conditioning per ASTM D4169 DC 13 Lvl 1. | All testing passed |
| Shelf Life | Performance evaluation conducted on aged devices and packaging. Aging conducted per ASTM F1980 and applicable standards with real time confirmatory studies completed in parallel or via real time studies alone. | Results support expiration dating on the labeling. |
| Radiopacity | Evaluated in vivo per ASTM F640 | All results met acceptance criteria and demonstrate the SureAx-Guide is radiopaque, is suitable for its intended use, and is substantially equivalent to the predicate device |
Page 3 of 4
{7}
K250203
Page 4 of 4
| Test | Reference Standards OR Test Method Summary | Results and Conclusions |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Non-clinical bench testing | • Visual inspection
• Pouch peel strength
• Dimensional verification
• Coating lubricity
• Simulated use conditioning
• Trackability
• Particulate evaluation
• Coating integrity
• Coating durability
• Tip flexibility
• Torqueability
• Torque strength
• Kink resistance
• Tip pull
• Tensile strength
• Corrosion resistance | All results met acceptance criteria and demonstrate the SureAx-Guide is suitable for its intended use and is substantially equivalent to the predicate device. |
Manufacturing and traceability of devices tested were conducted in accordance with 21 CFR Part 820 Good Manufacturing Practices. In all instances, the SureAx-Guide Guidewire functioned as intended and the results observed were as expected. These test results confirm that SureAx-Guide Guidewire complies with the recognized standards, meets the design specifications and performance requirements for the intended use, and is substantially equivalent to the predicate.
## VIII. CONCLUSIONS
The SureAx-Guide Guidewire is substantially equivalent to the Approach Hydro ST Guidewire predicate device (K091385). The SureAx-Guide Guidewire and its predicate share the same Product Code and classification as a Catheter guide wire. The SureAx-Guide Guidewire has the same intended use and indications for use as the predicate device. The SureAx-Guide Guidewire also has the same design and similar technological characteristics as the predicate device. Minor differences in technological characteristics do not raise different questions of safety and efficacy compared to the predicate.
The results from preclinical evaluations demonstrate that the technological and performance characteristics of the SureAx-Guide Guidewire meet defined design requirements. Performance and preclinical data demonstrate that the SureAx-Guide Guidewire performs as intended and is substantially equivalent to its predicate. This conclusion is based upon equivalence in the device's (1) design, (2) material technological characteristics, (3) technological characteristics, (4) principles of operation, (5) and intended use.
Page 4 of 4
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.