K244056 · Cranial Technologies, Inc. · OAN · Mar 17, 2025 · Neurology
Device Facts
Record ID
K244056
Device Name
DOC Band 3D
Applicant
Cranial Technologies, Inc.
Product Code
OAN · Neurology
Decision Date
Mar 17, 2025
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 882.5970
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic, Pediatric
Indications for Use
The DOC Band 3D (band) is a medical device known generically as a cranial orthosis. A cranial orthosis is used to treat a medical condition known as deformational plagiocephaly brachycephaly (DPB).
Device Story
DOC Band 3D is a custom-fitted cranial orthosis for infants 3-18 months. Device applies mild holding pressure to prominent cranial regions while encouraging growth in adjacent flattened areas to improve symmetry and shape. Used during period of rapid brain growth. Clinician custom-fits device to patient; adjustments made as needed throughout treatment. Device consists of 3D-printed semi-rigid polyamide outer shell and lightweight polyethylene foam inner layer. Replaces vacuum-formed shell of predicate devices with 3D-printed shell for increased precision and customization. Benefits patient by correcting cranial deformities through controlled pressure.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. Mechanical properties (shear, flexural, stiffness, fatigue, bond strength) compared to predicates; results meet or exceed predicate performance. Biocompatibility testing (cytotoxicity, irritation, sensitization) performed on polyamide 12 resin per ISO 10993, passing all tests. Clinical performance expected to be comparable to predicates.
Technological Characteristics
Cranial orthosis; semi-rigid polyamide 12 resin outer shell (3D printed); lightweight polyethylene foam inner layer. Custom-fit to patient anatomy. Mechanical properties tested for shear, flexural, stiffness, fatigue, and bond strength. Biocompatible per ISO 10993.
Indications for Use
Indicated for infants 3-18 months with moderate to severe non-synostotic cranial deformation (plagiocephalic, brachycephalic, scaphocephalic, or combinations). Also indicated for adjunctive use in infants 3-18 months post-surgical correction of synostosis with residual moderate to severe cranial deformities. Contraindicated for infants with craniosynostosis or hydrocephalus.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A cranial orthosis is a device that is intended for medical purposes to apply pressure to prominent regions of an infant's cranium in order to improve cranial symmetry and/or shape in infants from 3 to 18 months of age, with moderate to severe nonsynostotic positional plagiocephaly, including infants with plagiocephalic-, brachycephalic-, and scaphocephalic-shaped heads.
Special Controls
*Classification.* Class II (special controls) (prescription use in accordance with § 801.109 of this chapter, biocompatibility testing, and labeling (contraindications, warnings, precautions, adverse events, instructions for physicians and parents)).
In addition to the general controls of the act, the Dynamic Orthotic Cranioplasty - DOC™ Band is subject to the following special controls in order to provide reasonable assurance of the safety and effectiveness: (1) The sale, distribution and use of this device are restricted to prescription use in accordance with 21 CFR 801.109. (2) The labeling must include (a) contraindications for the use of the device on infants with synostosis or with hydrocephalus; (b) warnings indicating the need: (i) to evaluate head circumference measurements and neurological status at intervals appropriate to the infant’s age and rate of head growth, and to describe steps that should be taken in order to reduce the potential for restriction of cranial growth and possible impairment of brain growth and development; (ii) to evaluate the skin at frequent intervals, e.g., every three to four hours, and to describe steps that should be taken if skin irritation or breakdown occurs; (c) precautions indicating the need: (i) to additionally treat torticollis, if the positional plagiocephaly is associated with torticollis; (ii) to evaluate device fit and to describe the steps that should be taken in order to reduce the potential for restriction of cranial growth, possible impairment of brain growth and development and skin irritation and/or breakdown; (iii) to evaluate the structural integrity of the device and to describe the steps that should be taken to reduce the potential for the device to slip out of place and cause asphyxiation or trauma to the eyes or skin; (d) adverse events, i.e., skin irritation and breakdown that have occurred with the use of this device; (e) clinician’s instructions for casting the infant, for fitting the device, and for care and use of the device; and (f) parents’ instructions for care and use of the device. (3) The materials must be assessed for biocompatibility with testing appropriate for long term direct skin contact.
{0}------------------------------------------------
March 17, 2025
Image /page/0/Picture/1 description: The image contains the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). On the left, there is a symbol representing the Department of Health & Human Services-USA. To the right of the symbol, there is a blue square with the letters 'FDA' in white. Next to the blue square, the words 'U.S. FOOD & DRUG' are written in blue, with 'ADMINISTRATION' written in a smaller font size below.
Cranial Technologies, Inc. Jeff Riggs Quality Manager 1405 W Auto Dr, Floor 2 Tempe, Arizona 85284
## Re: K244056
Trade/Device Name: DOC Band 3D Regulation Number: 21 CFR 882.5970 Regulation Name: Cranial Orthosis Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: OAN Dated: December 31, 2024 Received: December 31, 2024
Dear Jeff Riggs:
We have reviewed your section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database available at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Additional information about changes that may require a new premarket notification are provided in the FDA guidance documents entitled "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99812/download) and "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Software Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99785/download).
{1}------------------------------------------------
Your device is also subject to, among other requirements, the Quality System (OS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820), which includes, but is not limited to, 21 CFR 820.30, Design controls; 21 CFR 820.90, Nonconforming product; and 21 CFR 820.100, Corrective and preventive action. Please note that regardless of whether a change requires premarket review, the QS regulation requires device manufacturers to review and approve changes to device design and production (21 CFR 820.30 and 21 CFR 820.70) and document changes and approvals in the device master record (21 CFR 820.181).
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR Part 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reportingcombination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR Parts 1000-1050.
All medical devices, including Class I and unclassified devices and combination product device constituent parts are required to be in compliance with the final Unique Device Identification System rule ("UDI Rue"). The UDI Rule requires, among other things, that a device bear a unique device identifier (UDI) on its label and package (21 CFR 801.20(a)) unless an exception or alternative applies (21 CFR 801.20(b)) and that the dates on the device label be formatted in accordance with 21 CFR 801.18. The UDI Rule (21 CFR 830.300(a) and 830.320(b)) also requires that certain information be submitted to the Global Unique Device Identification Database (GUDID) (21 CFR Part 830 Subpart E). For additional information on these requirements, please see the UDI System webpage at https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advicecomprehensive-regulatory-assistance/unique-device-identification-system-udi-system.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reportingmdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about medical devices and radiation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advice-comprehensive-regulatoryassistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
{2}------------------------------------------------
Sincerely,
Digitally signed by Adam D. Adam D. Pierce -S Date: 2025.03.17 Pierce -S 15:50:01 -04'00'
Adam D. Pierce, Ph.D. Assistant Director DHT5A: Division of Neurosurgical, Neurointerventional, and Neurodiagnostic Devices OHT5: Office of Neurological and Physical Medicine Devices Office of Product Evaluation and Quality Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{3}------------------------------------------------
# Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K244056
Device Name DOC Band 3D
#### Indications for Use (Describe)
The DOC Band is indicated for use on infants from three to eighteen months of age with moderate to severe nonsynostotic cranial deformation, infants with plagiocephalic-, and scaphocephalic-, and scaphocephalic-shaped heads, or a combination thereof.
The DOC Band 3D is also indicated for adjunctive use for infants from three to eighten months of age whose synostosis has been surgically corrected, but who still have moderate to severe cranial deformities including plagiocephalic-. brachycephalic-, and scaphocephalic-shaped heads, or a combination thereof.
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
| | Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) |
|--|----------------------------------------------|
| | Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C) |
### CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
#### *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{4}------------------------------------------------
## 510(k) Summary
Date: 03/17/2025
Applicant: Cranial Technologies, Inc.
Contact Person: Jeff Riggs
Phone: 480-403-6350
Address: 6511 W Frye Rd, Suite 3
Chandler, AZ 85226
Trade Name: DOC Band 3D
Common Name: Cranial Orthosis
Device Classification: Class II
Product Code: OAN
Requlation Number: 21 CFR 882.5970
Device Description: The DOC Band 3D is a cranial orthosis intended to treat positional plagiocephaly in infants from 3 to 18 months of age. The band is intended to apply a mild pressure to the prominent regions of an infant's cranium and to improve cranial symmetry, proportion, and/or shape.
Theory of Operation: The DOC Band 3D works by applying a mild holding pressure in regions where the head is already too prominent, while encouraging growth in the adjacent flattened regions. In this manner, the band is used to treat not only craniofacial asymmetry, but also proportionality (length to width ratio) of the head. The band is used from three to eighteen months of age because this is the period of rapid brain growth. After two years of age, skull growth stops, and any remaining growth of the cranium is primarily from thickening and hardening of the cranial bones,
Predicate Device(s):
- DOC Band® (K964992) .
- DOC Band (K141012) .
- DOC Band PostOp™ (K042385) .
Substantial Equivalence: The DOC Band 3D is substantially equivalent to the predicate devices. The primary difference is the manufacturing process: the DOC Band 3D utilizes 3D printing technology to fabricate the outer shell, while the predicate devices used vacuum forming. This change allows for greater precision and customization without affecting the device's intended use, safety, or effectiveness.
{5}------------------------------------------------
Intended Use: The DOC Band 3D (band) is a medical device known generically as a cranial orthosis. A cranial orthosis is used to treat a medical condition known as deformational plagiocephaly brachycephaly (DPB).
Indications for Use: The DOC Band is indicated for use on infants from three to eighteen months of age with moderate to severe non-synostotic cranial deformation, including infants with plagiocephalic-, brachycephalic-, and scaphocephalic-shaped heads, or a combination thereof.
The DOC Band 3D is also indicated for adjunctive use for infants from three to eighteen months of age whose synostosis has been surgically corrected, but who still have moderate to severe cranial deformities including plagiocephalic-, brachycephalic-, and scaphocephalic/dolicocephalic- shaped heads, or a combination thereof.
Contraindications for Use: The DOC Band 3D is contraindicated for use on infants with craniosynostosis or hydrocephalus.
Summary of Safety and Effectiveness: The DOC Band 3D is made from biocompatible materials that have undergone ISO 10993 testing to ensure safety. Bench testing has demonstrated that the device's mechanical properties meet or exceed those of the predicate devices. The clinical performance of the DOC Band 3D is expected to be comparable to the predicate devices in the treatment of deformational plagiocephaly.
| Feature/Parameter | Predicate Device (DOC Band -<br>K964992, K141012, K042385) | 3D Printed Cranial Remodeling<br>Orthosis (DOC Band 3D) |
|---------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Intended Use | The DOC Band (band) is a<br>medical device known<br>generically as a cranial<br>orthosis. A cranial orthosis is<br>used to treat a medical<br>condition known as<br>deformational plagiocephaly<br>brachycephaly (DPB). | The DOC Band 3D (band) is a<br>medical device known<br>generically as a cranial<br>orthosis. A cranial orthosis is<br>used to treat a medical<br>condition known as<br>deformational plagiocephaly<br>brachycephaly (DPB). |
| Indications for Use | The DOC Band is indicated for<br>use on infants from three to<br>eighteen months of age with<br>moderate to severe non-<br>synostotic cranial deformation,<br>including infants with<br>plagiocephalic-,<br>brachycephalic-, and | The DOC Band 3D is indicated<br>for use on infants from three to<br>eighteen months of age with<br>moderate to severe non-<br>synostotic cranial deformation,<br>including infants with<br>plagiocephalic-,<br>brachycephalic-, and |
| Feature/Parameter | Predicate Device (DOC Band -<br>K964992, K141012, K042385) | 3D Printed Cranial Remodeling<br>Orthosis (DOC Band 3D) |
| | scaphocephalic-shaped heads,<br>or a combination thereof. | scaphocephalic-shaped heads,<br>or a combination thereof. |
| | The DOC Band PostOp is also<br>indicated for adjunctive use for<br>infants from three to eighteen<br>months of age whose<br>synostosis has been surgically<br>corrected, but who still have<br>moderate to severe cranial<br>deformities including<br>plagiocephalic-,<br>brachycephalic-, and<br>scaphocephalic/dolicocephalic-<br>shaped heads. | The DOC Band 3D is also<br>indicated for adjunctive use for<br>infants from three to eighteen<br>months of age whose<br>synostosis has been surgically<br>corrected, but who still have<br>moderate to severe cranial<br>deformities including<br>plagiocephalic-,<br>brachycephalic-, and<br>scaphocephalic/dolicocephalic-<br>shaped heads. |
| Materials: Outer<br>Shell | Semi-rigid copolymer<br>(polypropylene-ethylene) | Semi-rigid polyamide (3D<br>printed) |
| Materials: Inner<br>Layer | Lightweight polyethylene foam | Lightweight polyethylene foam |
| Manufacturing<br>Process | Vacuum forming over a milled<br>plaster model | 3D printing |
| Biocompatibility | Biocompatible materials tested | Biocompatible materials tested |
| Bench Testing | Mechanical properties tested | Mechanical properties tested;<br>meets or exceeds predicate<br>performance |
| Sizing | Customized for each patient | Customized for each patient |
| Fitting and<br>Adjustment | Custom-fit by clinician,<br>adjustments as needed | Custom-fit by clinician,<br>adjustments as needed |
Comparison of DOC Band 3D to Predicate Devices
{6}------------------------------------------------
{7}------------------------------------------------
Test Summary of Non-Clinical Data
To ensure substantial equivalence of their mechanical forces, the predicate DOC Band and proposed DOC Band 3D both underwent mechanical testing of their shear, flexural, stiffness, fatigue and bond strength. Senior clinicians evaluated the proposed device against the predicate device to confirm equivalent donning and doffing procedures, trims and adjustment procedures, demonstrating substantial equivalence in the fit and treatment protocols. The new material in the proposed device (as compared to the predicate) is the outer shell. It is a polyamide 12 resin, which was tested per ISO 10993 for cytotoxicity, irritation and sensitization, passing all tests per standards.
Conclusion: The DOC Band 3D is substantially equivalent to the predicate device.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.