ELID (Endoscopic Less Invasive Decompression) System
Applicant
Lesspine Innovations
Product Code
HRX · Orthopedic
Decision Date
Aug 27, 2025
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 888.1100
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic
Indications for Use
The ELID (Endoscopic Less Invasive Decompression) system intended to provide lumbar decompression of the spine to treat various spinal condition(s) using minimally invasive techniques and instrumentation.
Device Story
The ELID System is a set of manual surgical instruments used by surgeons to perform minimally invasive lumbar decompression. The system includes a bone needle, guidewire, flat blade dilator, dilator tubes, and rongeurs. The surgeon uses the bone needle and guidewire to navigate to the surgical site, followed by the flat blade dilator and dilator tubes to create the necessary access path. Finally, the rongeurs are used to remove bone and tissue to achieve decompression. The device is used in a clinical or surgical setting. The output is the physical removal of bone/tissue, which allows the surgeon to decompress the spine, potentially relieving symptoms associated with spinal conditions.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. Testing included cleaning validation, sterilization validation, biocompatibility, usability testing, and particulate analysis per ASTM F1877. Results demonstrate that the system's strength is sufficient for its intended use and equivalent to predicate devices.
Technological Characteristics
Manual surgical instruments including bone needle, flat blade dilator, dilator tubes, and rongeurs. Materials: Aluminum (ASTM B211), Nitinol (ASTM F2063), and stainless steel (ASTM A564). Non-sterile, reusable. No energy source or software.
Indications for Use
Indicated for patients requiring lumbar decompression of the spine to treat various spinal conditions using minimally invasive techniques.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
An arthroscope is an electrically powered endoscope intended to make visible the interior of a joint. The arthroscope and accessories also is intended to perform surgery within a joint.
{0}
FDA U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION
August 27, 2025
LESpine Innovations
% Hannah Taggart
Regulatory Associate
Empirical Technologies
4628 Northpark Drive
Colorado Springs, Colorado 80918
Re: K243774
Trade/Device Name: ELID (Endoscopic Less Invasive Decompression) System
Regulation Number: 21 CFR 888.1100
Regulation Name: Arthroscope
Regulatory Class: Class II
Product Code: HRX
Dated: August 1, 2025
Received: August 1, 2025
Dear Hannah Taggart:
We have reviewed your section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database available at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
U.S. Food & Drug Administration
10903 New Hampshire Avenue
Silver Spring, MD 20993
www.fda.gov
{1}
K243774 - Hannah Taggart
Page 2
Additional information about changes that may require a new premarket notification are provided in the FDA guidance documents entitled "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99812/download) and "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Software Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99785/download).
Your device is also subject to, among other requirements, the Quality System (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820), which includes, but is not limited to, 21 CFR 820.30, Design controls; 21 CFR 820.90, Nonconforming product; and 21 CFR 820.100, Corrective and preventive action. Please note that regardless of whether a change requires premarket review, the QS regulation requires device manufacturers to review and approve changes to device design and production (21 CFR 820.30 and 21 CFR 820.70) and document changes and approvals in the device master record (21 CFR 820.181).
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR Part 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reporting-combination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR Parts 1000-1050.
All medical devices, including Class I and unclassified devices and combination product device constituent parts are required to be in compliance with the final Unique Device Identification System rule ("UDI Rule"). The UDI Rule requires, among other things, that a device bear a unique device identifier (UDI) on its label and package (21 CFR 801.20(a)) unless an exception or alternative applies (21 CFR 801.20(b)) and that the dates on the device label be formatted in accordance with 21 CFR 801.18. The UDI Rule (21 CFR 830.300(a) and 830.320(b)) also requires that certain information be submitted to the Global Unique Device Identification Database (GUDID) (21 CFR Part 830 Subpart E). For additional information on these requirements, please see the UDI System webpage at https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance/unique-device-identification-system-udi-system.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reporting-mdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about medical devices and radiation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-
{2}
K243774 - Hannah Taggart
Page 3
assistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
JESSE
MUIR -S
Digitally signed by
JESSE MUIR -S
Date: 2025.08.27
14:42:07 -04'00'
Jesse Muir, Ph.D.
Assistant Director
DHT6C: Division of Restorative,
Repair, and Trauma Devices
OHT6: Office of Orthopedic Devices
Office of Product Evaluation and Quality
Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{3}
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
Indications for Use
Form Approved: OMB No. 0910-0120
Expiration Date: 07/31/2026
See PRA Statement below.
Submission Number (if known)
K243774
Device Name
ELID (Endoscopic Less Invasive Decompression) System
Indications for Use (Describe)
The ELID (Endoscopic Less Invasive Decompression) system intended to provide lumbar decompression of the spine to treat various spinal condition(s) using minimally invasive techniques and instrumentation.
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
☑ Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
☐ Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
**CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.**
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
**DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.**
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
Department of Health and Human Services
Food and Drug Administration
Office of Chief Information Officer
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff
PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{4}
K243774 510(K) SUMMARY
| Submitter’s Name: | LESspine Innovations |
| --- | --- |
| Submitter’s Address: | 200 Summit Drive, Suite 505
Burlington MA 01803 |
| Submitter’s Telephone: | 617-820-2900 |
| Contact Person: | Hannah Taggart, MS
Empirical Technologies
719- 457-1152
htaggart@empiricaltech.com |
| Date Summary was Prepared: | August 1, 2025 |
| Trade or Proprietary Name: | ELID (Endoscopic Less Invasive Decompression) System |
| Device Classification Name: | Arthroscopic Accessories |
| Classification & Regulation #: | Class II per 21 CFR §888.1100 |
| Product Code: | HRX |
| Classification Panel: | Orthopedic |
## DEVICE DESCRIPTION AND TECHNOLOGY
The ELID (Endoscopic Less Invasive Decompression) System consists of instrumentation intended to aid the user in completing steps necessary to perform lumbar decompression. Instruments include a bone needle, flat blade dilator, dilator tubes, and rongeurs. Instruments in the ELID (Endoscopic Less Invasive Decompression) System are supplied non-sterile, reusable, and manufactured from aluminum per ASTM B211, Nitinol per ASTM 2063, or stainless steel per ASTM A564.
## INDICATIONS FOR USE
The ELID (Endoscopic Less Invasive Decompression) System is intended to provide lumbar decompression of the spine to treat various spinal condition(s) using minimally invasive techniques and instrumentation.
## TECHNOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS
The predicates included in this submission were selected based on the best practices described in the FDA Draft Guidance document Best Practices for Selecting a Predicate Device to Support a Premarket Notification [510(k)] Submission. The subject and predicate devices have nearly identical technological characteristics and the minor differences do not raise any new issues of safety and effectiveness. Specifically, the following characteristics are identical between the subject and predicates:
- Indications for Use
- Materials of manufacture
- Device Components
Predicate Devices
| 510k Number | Trade or Proprietary | Manufacturer | Product Code | Predicate Type |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| K233800 | Vertos mild Device Kit | Vertos Medical | HRX, HAE | Primary |
| K993012/K002931 | METRx™ System | Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. | HRX | Additional |
| K210741 | KLS Martin Neuro Rongeurs | KLS-Martin L.P. | HAE | Reference |
| K152734 | Vitalitec Kerrison Rongeurs | Vitalitec Medizintechnik GmbH | HAE | Reference |
1 | Page
{5}
2 | Page
| | | ELID System
(Subject Device) | Vertos Medical mild Device Kit
(K233800) | Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc., METRx™ System
(K993021/K002931) | KLS Martin Neuro Rongeurs
(K210741) | Vitalitec Kerrison Rongeurs
(K152734) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Indications for Use | | The ELID (Endoscopic Less Invasive Decompression) System intended to provide lumbar decompression of the spine to treat various spinal condition(s) using minimally invasive techniques and instrumentation. | The Vertos Medical mild Device Kit is a set of specialized surgical instruments intended to be used to perform lumbar decompressive procedures for the treatment of various spinal conditions. | The METRx™ Microscope is indicated for visualization of the surgical field in any area of the body cut open during a surgical procedure. When used in the cervical, thoracic, or lumbar spine either from an anterior or posterior direction, for example, the METRx™ Microscope and accessories are intended to aid the surgeon's visualization of the surgical area and allow him/her to perform any type of surgical spinal procedure such as herniated disc repair, visualization of the circumferential decompression of the nerve roots, aiding in the search and removal of nucleus material, spinal fusion, or insertion of spinal implants. | The KLS Martin Neuro Rongeurs are manually operated instruments indicated for cutting or biting bone during surgery involving the skull or spinal column in patients two years of age or older. | Vitalitec Kerrison Rongeurs are manually operated reusable surgical instruments used for cutting or biting bone during surgery involving the skull or spinal column. |
| Classification | | 888.1100 | 888.1100 | 888.1100 | 882.4840 | 882.4840 |
| Product Code | | HRX, HAE | HRX, HAE | HRX | HAE | HAE |
| Sterility | | Non-sterile, reusable | Sterile, single-use | Non-sterile | Non-sterile, reusable | Non-sterile, reusable |
| Device Components | Navigation to Site | Bone Needle
Material: Stainless Steel
Guidewire
Material: Nitinol per ASTM F2063
Size: Ø1.5mm x 500 mm | mild Initiator
Material: Acrylonitrile butadiene styrene, stainless steel, polycarbonate, thermoplastic elastomer | Guidewire
Material: Unknown
Sizes: Ø1.57 mm x 300 mm | Not Applicable | Not Applicable |
| | Dilation of Site | Flat Blade Dilator
Material: 17-4 PH SS per ASTM A564
Dilator Tubes
Material: 7075-T6 Al per ASTM B211
Sizes: Ø6.0mm, Ø8.0mm, Ø12.9mm, Ø16.3mm | mild Access Auger
Material: Stainless Steel | Dilators
Material: Unknown
Sizes: Ø5.3 mm – Ø24.8 mm | Not Applicable | Not Applicable |
| | Tissue/Bone Removal | Kerrison Rongeur
Material: Stainless Steel
Sizes: 3mm, 5mm, 4mm, 6mm | mild Bone Rongeur
Material: Stainless Steel
mild Tissue Sculptor
Material: Acrylonitrile butadiene styrene, stainless steel, nylon, zinc-plated wire | Kerrison Rongeur
Material: Unknown
Sizes: 1mm, 2mm, 3mm, 4mm, 5mm | Kerrison Rongeur
Material: Stainless Steel, TiAlN coating, gold plating
Sizes: 1mm to 6mm | Kerrison Rongeur
Material: Stainless Steel, TiAlN coating
Sizes: 1mm to 6mm |
{6}
The subject device is different from the predicate device in that the subject system includes a flat blade dilator and guidewire which the predicate devices do not use during the decompression procedure. Both the subject flat blade dilator and guidewire have been cleared and remain unchanged since their previous submission.
## PERFORMANCE DATA
The ELID (Endoscopic Less Invasive Decompression) System has been tested in the following test modes:
- Cleaning Validation
- Sterilization Validation
- Biocompatibility
- Usability Testing
- Particulate Analysis per ASTM F1877
The results of this non-clinical testing show that the strength of the ELID (Endoscopic Less Invasive Decompression) System is sufficient for its intended use and is substantially equivalent to legally marketed predicate devices.
## CONCLUSION
The overall technology characteristics and mechanical performance data lead to the conclusion that the ELID (Endoscopic Less Invasive Decompression) System is substantially equivalent to the predicate device.
3 | Page
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.