Persona® Revision Knee System (Persona Revision SoluTion™ Femoral Components)
K243724 · Zimmer, Inc. · JWH · Mar 6, 2025 · Orthopedic
Device Facts
Record ID
K243724
Device Name
Persona® Revision Knee System (Persona Revision SoluTion™ Femoral Components)
Applicant
Zimmer, Inc.
Product Code
JWH · Orthopedic
Decision Date
Mar 6, 2025
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 888.3560
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic
Indications for Use
This device is indicated for patients with severe knee pain and disability due to: -Rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis, traumatic arthritis, polyarthritis. -Collagen disorders, and/or avascular necrosis of the femoral condyle. -Post-traumatic loss of joint configuration, particularly when there is patellofemoral erosion, dysfunction or prior patellectomy. -Moderate valgus, varus, or flexion deformities. -The salvage of previously failed surgical attempts or for a knee in which satisfactory stability in flexion cannot be obtained at the time of surgery. Porous components may be used cemented or uncemented (biological fixation). Augments may be attached via bone cement or screw to the tibial plates and/or femoral components. Splined stem extension components are intended to be used press-fit (uncemented). All other femoral component, tibial plate, stem extension, and femoral and tibial augment components are indicated for cemented use only.
Device Story
Persona Revision SoluTion Femoral Components are modular knee prosthesis components designed for total knee arthroplasty. They function as part of the Persona Revision Knee System to resurface femoral bones, articulating against tibial components. The device is used in clinical settings by orthopedic surgeons. The new components are manufactured from forged Ti-6Al-4V alloy with a Ti-Nidium nitrogen surface hardening process, replacing the Co-Cr-Mo alloy used in predicate devices. These components are compatible with various augments, cones, and stem extensions to match patient anatomy. The device is provided sterile and for single use. It provides structural support and joint articulation to restore knee function and stability, benefiting patients suffering from severe pain and disability due to degenerative or traumatic joint conditions.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical data. Substantial equivalence is supported by non-clinical bench testing, including anterior flange and posterior condyle fatigue evaluations, in vitro wear testing, constraint and range of motion assessments, augment shear and torque testing, stem junction fatigue, and fretting corrosion assessments. RF-induced heating simulations were also performed.
Technological Characteristics
Modular femoral knee prosthesis components. Material: Forged Ti-6Al-4V with Ti-Nidium nitrogen surface hardening. Design: Semi-constrained. Compatibility: Compatible with existing Persona Revision system augments, cones, and stem extensions. Sterilization: Provided sterile for single use. Connectivity: None.
Indications for Use
Indicated for patients with severe knee pain and disability due to rheumatoid, osteoarthritis, traumatic, or polyarthritis; collagen disorders; avascular necrosis; post-traumatic joint loss; or moderate valgus, varus, or flexion deformities. Also indicated for salvage of failed surgical attempts or knee instability in flexion.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A knee joint patellofemorotibial polymer/metal/polymer semi-constrained cemented prosthesis is a device intended to be implanted to replace a knee joint. The device limits translation and rotation in one or more planes via the geometry of its articulating surfaces. It has no linkage across-the-joint. This generic type of device includes prostheses that have a femoral component made of alloys, such as cobalt-chromium-molybdenum, and a tibial component or components and a retropatellar resurfacing component made of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene. This generic type of device is limited to those prostheses intended for use with bone cement (§ 888.3027).
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). On the left is the Department of Health & Human Services logo. To the right of that is the FDA logo, which is a blue square with the letters "FDA" in white. To the right of the blue square is the text "U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION" in blue.
March 6, 2025
Zimmer, Inc. Gregory Foster Regulatory Affairs Principal 1800 W. Center Street Warsaw, Indiana 46580
Re: K243724
Trade/Device Name: Persona® Revision Knee System (Persona Revision SoluTion™ Femoral Components) Regulation Number: 21 CFR 888.3560 Regulation Name: Knee Joint Patellofemorotibial Polymer Semi-Constrained Cemented Prosthesis Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: JWH, MBH, OIY Dated: December 3, 2024 Received: February 10, 2025
Dear Gregory Foster:
We have reviewed your section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database available at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
{1}------------------------------------------------
Additional information about changes that may require a new premarket notification are provided in the FDA guidance documents entitled "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99812/download) and "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Software Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99785/download).
Your device is also subject to, among other requirements, the Quality System (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820), which includes, but is not limited to, 21 CFR 820.30. Design controls; 21 CFR 820.90. Nonconforming product; and 21 CFR 820.100, Corrective and preventive action. Please note that regardless of whether a change requires premarket review, the QS regulation requires device manufacturers to review and approve changes to device design and production (21 CFR 820.30 and 21 CFR 820.70) and document changes and approvals in the device master record (21 CFR 820.181).
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR Part 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reportingcombination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR Parts 1000-1050.
All medical devices, including Class I and unclassified devices and combination product device constituent parts are required to be in compliance with the final Unique Device Identification System rule ("UDI Rule"). The UDI Rule requires, among other things, that a device bear a unique device identifier (UDI) on its label and package (21 CFR 801.20(a)) unless an exception or alternative applies (21 CFR 801.20(b)) and that the dates on the device label be formatted in accordance with 21 CFR 801.18. The UDI Rule (21 CFR 830.300(a) and 830.320(b)) also requires that certain information be submitted to the Global Unique Device Identification Database (GUDID) (21 CFR Part 830 Subpart E). For additional information on these requirements, please see the UDI System webpage at https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advicecomprehensive-regulatory-assistance/unique-device-identification-system-udi-system.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reportingmdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about mediation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory
{2}------------------------------------------------
assistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
# Lixin Liu -S
Lixin Liu, Ph.D Assistant Director DHT6A: Division of Joint Arthroplasty Devices OHT6: Office of Orthopedic Devices Office of Product Evaluation and Quality Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{3}------------------------------------------------
#### Indications for Use
Submission Number (if known)
K243724
Device Name
Persona® Revision Knee System (Persona Revision SoluTion™ Femoral Components)
Indications for Use (Describe)
This device is indicated for patients with severe knee pain and disability due to: -Rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis, traumatic arthritis, polyarthritis.
-Collagen disorders, and/or avascular necrosis of the femoral condyle.
-Post-traumatic loss of joint configuration, particularly when there is patellofemoral erosion, dysfunction or prior patellectomy.
-Moderate valgus, varus, or flexion deformities.
-The salvage of previously failed surgical attempts or for a knee in which satisfactory stability in flexion cannot be obtained at the time of surgery.
Porous components may be used cemented or uncemented (biological fixation). Augments may be attached via bone cement or screw to the tibial plates and/or femoral components. Splined stem extension components are intended to be used press-fit (uncemented). All other femoral component, tibial plate, stem extension, and femoral and tibial augment components are indicated for cemented use only.
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
#### CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
#### *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{4}------------------------------------------------
K243724 Page 1 of 2
21 CFR 807.92(a)(4)
21 CFR 807.92(a)(5)
| 510(k) #: K243724 | 510(k) Summary | | Prepared on: 2025-03-05 |
|------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------|-------------------------|
| Contact Details | | | 21 CFR 807.92(a)(1) |
| Applicant Name | Zimmer, Inc. | | |
| Applicant Address | 1800 W. Center Street Warsaw IN 46580 United States | | |
| Applicant Contact Telephone | (574) 371-0519 | | |
| Applicant Contact | Dr. Gregory Foster | | |
| Applicant Contact Email | gregory.foster@zimmerbiomet.com | | |
| Device Name | | | 21 CFR 807.92(a)(2) |
| Device Trade Name | Persona® Revision Knee System (Persona Revision SoluTion™ Femoral<br>Components) | | |
| Common Name | Knee Prosthesis | | |
| Classification Name | Knee joint patellofemorotibial polymer/metal/polymer semi-constrained<br>cemented prosthesis | | |
| Regulation Number | 888.3560; 888.3565 | | |
| Product Code(s) | JWH, MBH, OIY | | |
| Legally Marketed Predicate Devices | | | 21 CFR 807.92(a)(3) |
| Predicate # | Predicate Trade Name (Primary Predicate is listed first) | Product Code | |
| K181947 | Persona® Revision Knee System | JWH, MBH, | |
| K200209 | Persona® Personalized Knee System | JWH, OIY | |
### Device Description Summary
The purpose of this submission is to add a new component to the Persona Revision Knee System, the component is the Persona Revision SoluTion Femoral Components. The addition of these components do not change the intended use or fundamental scientific technology of the device system.
The Persona Revision Knee System is a semiconstrained modular knee prosthesis designed to resurface of the femoral and tibial bones. With this submission a new Ti-6Al-4V femoral component will be added to the system. These femoral components articulate against an articular surface of the tibial component, as well as, a pat of a total knee system. The new femoral components are compatible with a variety of augments, cones, and stem extent of sizes to match the needs of a patient's anatomy when performing total knee arthroplasty. These components are provided sterile and single use.
### Intended Use/Indications for Use
This device is indicated for patients with severe knee pain and disability due to: -Rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis, traumatic arthritis, polyarthritis.
-Collagen disorders, and/or avascular necrosis of the femoral condyle.
-Post-traumatic loss of joint configuration, particularly when there is patellofemoral erosion, dysfunction or prior patellectorny.
{5}------------------------------------------------
21 CFR 807.92(a)(5)
21 CFR 807.92(a)(6)
- Moderate valgus, varus, or flexion deformities.
-The salvage of previously failed surgical attempts or for a knee in which satisfactory stability in flexion cannot be obtained at the time of surgery.
Porous components may be used cemented (biological fixation). Augments may be attached via bone cement or screw to the tibial plates and/or femoral components. Splined stem extension components are intended to be used press-fit (uncemented). All other femoral component, tibial plate, stem extension, and tibial augment components are indicated for cemented use only.
### Indications for Use Comparison
The Indications for Use are Identical between the Subject and Predicate devices.
## Technological Comparison
The subject and predicate devices are both femoral components. The articulating geometry are equivalent between the predicate and the subject devices. The difference is that the predicate is manufactured with Co-Cr-Mo alloy, while the subject device is manufactured with forged Ti-6Al-4V and undergoes the Ti-Nidium™ nitrogen surfacing hardening process.
#### Non-Clinical and/or Clinical Tests Summary & Conclusions 21 CFR 807.92(b)
Anterior Flange Fatigue Evaluation of the Persona Revision SoluTion Femoral Components.
Posterior Condyle Fatigue Evaluation of the Persona Revision SoluTion Femoral Components.
In Vitro Wear Evaluation of the Persona SoluTion Revision Femoral Components Coupled with Persona Revision Vivacit-E and Persona Primary PS and CPS Vivacit-E Bearings.
In Vitro 3BW and Roughened Femoral Evaluation of the Persona Revision SoluTion Femoral Components.
Persona Revision SoluTion Femur Constraint, Range of Motion (ROM), Contact Area, and Contact Stress Assessment.
Persona Revision SoluTion Femur Augment Shear.
Persona SoluTion Revision Femur Augment Torque.
Persona Revision TiNidium (SoluTion) Stem Junction Fatigue
Persona Revision SoluTion Femur Stem Static Axial Pull-Off
Persona Revision SoluTion Femur Stem Static Torque-Off.
Expanded In-Vivo RF-Induced Heating Simulations for the Persona Revision Knee System (which included analysis of magnetically induced displacement force and torque).
Persona Revision SoluTion Femur Fretting Corrosion Assessment.
Clinical Testing Not Applicable
The proposed device has the same intended use as the proposed device has similar technological characteristics to the predicate(s), and the information provided herein demonstrates that:
· any differences do not raise different questions of safety and effectiveness; and
· the proposed device is at least as safe and effective as the legally marketed predicate device(s).
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.