The Delphi Stimulator is intended to be used for stimulation of peripheral nerves for diagnostic purposes.
Device Story
Delphi Stimulator is a magnetic stimulator for non-invasive peripheral nerve stimulation; diagnostic use. System comprises a stimulator box containing power electronics (high-voltage capacitor bank) and an external figure-8 magnetic coil. Operator controls device via PC workstation interface to manage stimulus sequences, intensity, and pulse parameters. Device generates biphasic magnetic pulses (up to 3 pps) to induce neural tissue stimulation. Output parameters (amplitude, magnetic field strength) are slightly lower than predicate. Used in clinical settings by trained operators. Healthcare providers use output to assess nerve function; aids in diagnostic decision-making. Benefits include non-invasive nerve stimulation with potentially reduced adverse event risk due to lower output parameters.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. No clinical data. Testing included electrical safety (IEC 60601-1), EMC (IEC 60601-1-2), software validation (IEC 62304), and comparative performance bench testing against the predicate. Results demonstrated substantial equivalence in output parameters and system functionality.
Technological Characteristics
Magnetic stimulator; air-core figure-8 coil. Biphasic pulse waveform; pulse width 285 µs; max frequency 3 pps. Power electronics with high-voltage capacitor bank. PC-based user interface. Electrical safety per IEC 60601-1; EMC per IEC 60601-1-2. Dimensions: 210 x 440 x 500mm; weight 20 kg. Input: 110V–240V, 50/60 Hz.
Indications for Use
Indicated for stimulation of peripheral nerves for diagnostic purposes in patients requiring such diagnostic procedures.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
An evoked response electrical stimulator is a device used to apply an electrical stimulus to a patient by means of skin electrodes for the purpose of measuring the evoked response.
{0}------------------------------------------------
November 5, 2024
Image /page/0/Picture/1 description: The image contains the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The logo consists of two parts: the Department of Health & Human Services logo on the left and the FDA logo on the right. The FDA logo features the letters 'FDA' in a blue square, followed by the words 'U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION' in blue text.
QuantalX Neuroscience % Bosmat Friedman Regulatory Consultant ProMedoss, Inc. 6026 Beech Cove Lane Charlotte, North Carolina 28269
Re: K242345
Trade/Device Name: Delphi Stimulator Regulation Number: 21 CFR 882.1870 Regulation Name: Evoked Response Electrical Stimulator Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: GWF Dated: August 5, 2024 Received: August 7, 2024
Dear Bosmat Friedman:
We have reviewed your section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database available at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Additional information about changes that may require a new premarket notification are provided in the FDA guidance documents entitled "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Change to an Existing Device"
{1}------------------------------------------------
(https://www.fda.gov/media/99812/download) and "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Software Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99785/download).
Your device is also subject to, among other requirements, the Quality System (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820), which includes, but is not limited to, 21 CFR 820.30. Design controls; 21 CFR 820.90. Nonconforming product; and 21 CFR 820.100, Corrective and preventive action. Please note that regardless of whether a change requires premarket review. the OS regulation requires device manufacturers to review and approve changes to device design and production (21 CFR 820.30 and 21 CFR 820.70) and document changes and approvals in the device master record (21 CFR 820.181).
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR Part 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reportingcombination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR Parts 1000-1050.
All medical devices, including Class I and unclassified devices and combination product device constituent parts are required to be in compliance with the final Unique Device Identification System rule ("UDI Rue"). The UDI Rule requires, among other things, that a device bear a unique device identifier (UDI) on its label and package (21 CFR 801.20(a)) unless an exception or alternative applies (21 CFR 801.20(b)) and that the dates on the device label be formatted in accordance with 21 CFR 801.18. The UDI Rule (21 CFR 830.300(a) and 830.320(b)) also requires that certain information be submitted to the Global Unique Device Identification Database (GUDID) (21 CFR Part 830 Subpart E). For additional information on these requirements, please see the UDI System webpage at https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advicecomprehensive-regulatory-assistance/unique-device-identification-system-udi-system.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reportingmdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about mediation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advice-comprehensive-regulatoryassistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
{2}------------------------------------------------
Sincerely,
# Jay R. Gupta -S
Jay Gupta Assistant Director DHT5A: Division of Neurosurgical, Neurointerventional, and Neurodiagnostic Devices OHT5: Office of Neurological and Physical Medicine Devices Office of Product Evaluation and Quality Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{3}------------------------------------------------
## Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K242345
Device Name Delphi Stimulator
Indications for Use (Describe)
The Delphi Stimulator is intended to be used for stimulation of peripheral nerves for diagnostic purposes.
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
X Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
| Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
### CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
### *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{4}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/4/Picture/0 description: The image shows the word "Quantalx" in a bold, sans-serif font. Below the word "Quantalx" is the word "Neuroscience" in a smaller, purple font. The word "Neuroscience" is flanked by two small dots.
Traditional 510(k)
510(k) Summary
### 510(k) Summary [Traditional 510(k)] Delphi Stimulator 510(k) Number K242345
### 1 SUBMITTER
Applicant's Name: QuantalX Neuroscience 1 Hatachana St. Kfar-Saba Israel Primary Contact:
Bosmat Friedman Regulatory Affairs Consultant 6026 Beech Cove Ln. Charlotte, NC 28269 Phone: 980-308-1636 bosmat.f(@promedoss.com
### Date Prepared: August 1, 2024
2 DEVICE Trade Name: Delphi Stimulator Classification Code: Device: Stimulator, Electrical, Evoked Response Product Code: GWF Regulation No: 21 CFR 882.1870 Class: 2 Review Panel: Neurology
#### 3 PREDICATE DEVICE
### Primary Predicate:
- MagPro, Model R20, by Tonica Elektronik A/S. Product code: GWF, cleared under: . K160280.
#### 4 DEVICE DESCRIPTION
Delphi stimulator is a Magnetic stimulator used for Magnetic stimulation of peripheral nerves for diagnostic purposes. Magnetic stimulation is a non-invasive technique for stimulating neural tissue. Application areas of magnetic stimulation are a sub-set of the application areas for current stimulation. The Delphi stimulator is connected to a Magnetic Coil which transfers the magnetic stimulation to the tissue.
The stimulator consists of power electronics to generate the magnetic field in the Magnetic Coil. It is controlled via a user interface installed on a PC workstation connected to the stimulator. enabling the operator to overview all functions, stimulus sequences, controls, status and measured data. The magnetic pulse is Biphasic waveform and the stimulator can stimulate with a
{5}------------------------------------------------
frequency of up to 3 pulses per second (pps).
#### 5 INDICATIONS FOR USE
The Delphi Stimulator is intended to be used for stimulation of peripheral nerves for diagnostic purposes.
#### SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE 6
The Delphi Stimulator is substantially equivalent to the predicate device based on the following:
#### 7 INTENDED USE
The intended use of the proposed device is the same as that of the cleared device.
#### 8 TECHNOLOGY
The Delphi Stimulator device has similar overall technological characteristics as the predicate MagPro R20 (K160280). Both devices are comprised of a stimulator box and an attached probe. The stimulator box of both devices consists of power electronics circuitry which enables the action of accumulating energy in high voltage capacitor bank and discharge it rapidly on the probe load creating stimulation magnetic energy. Both devices have the same biphasic output stimulation shape and a very similar pulse width. Overall, the devices are very similar, however, the maximal available Delphi Stimulator output parameters are slightly lower than those of the predicate (per design). A comparative assessment between the Delphi Stimulator and predicate was conducted demonstrating that 100% amplitude of the Delphi stimulator is identical to 83% amplitude of the predicate device, and both have the same biphasic pulse duration. With respect to magnetic field parameters, the Peak Magnetic field strength at 2 cm [Tesla] at stimulators maximum output is 0.374 T for Delphi and 0.45 T for the predicate which correspond to 83% of predicate device which still provides the appropriate range for peripheral nerve stimulation for majority of cases with the likelihood of reduced occurrence of adverse events.
| | Subject Device | Predicate Device | |
|-------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Attribute | Delphi Stimulator | MagPro R20 + MC-B65HO-2m<br>Tonica Elektronik A/S | Comparison |
| 510(k) Number | NA | K160280 | -- |
| Classification | GWF | GWF | Same |
| Regulation Number | 882.1870 | 882.1870 | Same |
| Indications<br>for use | The Delphi Stimulator is intended to<br>be used for stimulation of peripheral<br>nerves for diagnostic purposes. | MagPro R20 is intended to be used for<br>stimulation of peripheral nerves for<br>diagnostic purposes. | Same |
| <b>Probe (coil)</b> | | | |
| Probe configuration | Figure-8 coil shape | Figure-8 coil shape | Same |
| Probe core material | Air core | Air core | Same |
| Probe dimensions | Inner diameter: 26.3mm<br>Outer diameter: 60mm<br>Winding height: 5.3mm<br>Number of windings: $2 \times (2 \times 13)$ | Inner diameter: 35mm<br>Outer diameter: 75mm<br>Winding height: 11mm<br>Number of windings: $2 \times (2 \times 5)$ | Similar; the<br>dimensions of the<br>Delphi Probe are<br>slightly smaller; the<br>probe and stimulator<br>as a system produce<br>the same magnetic<br>stimulation up to 83%<br>of predicate amplitude. |
| Output Stimulation Parameters | | | |
{6}------------------------------------------------
| | Quantalx | |
|--|----------|--|
| | | |
· Neuroscience ·
Traditional 510(k)
510(k) Summary
| | Subject Device | Predicate Device | |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Attribute | Delphi Stimulator | MagPro R20 + MC-B65HO-2m<br>Tonica Elektronik A/S | Comparison |
| Amplitude | [0 – 1.42] SMT | [0 – 1.7] SMT | Delphi amplitude is<br>slightly lower than the<br>predicate. |
| Output stimulation shape | Biphasic | Biphasic | Same |
| Pulse width | 285 $ \textmu $ sec | 280 $ \textmu $ sec | Same |
| Pulse per second | 3 pps | 20 pps | Delphi maximal pps is<br>lower than the<br>predicate. |
| Maximum coil current at coil<br>SMT | 5260A peak @ 1.42 SMT | 6630A peak @ 1.7 SMT | Delphi result is lower<br>than the predicate |
| Magnetic Field | | | |
| Peak Magnetic field strength<br>at 2 cm [Tesla] at stimulators<br>maximum output | 0.374 T | 0.45 T | Delphi peak magnetic<br>field strength is<br>slightly lower than the<br>predicate. |
| Peak dB/dt at 2 cm [Tesla/<br>$ \textmu $ sec] at stimulators<br>maximum output | 0.0081 | 0.01 | Delphi result is lower<br>than the predicate |
| Peak dB/dt at coil surface<br>[Tesla/ $ \textmu $ sec] at stimulators<br>maximum output | 0.0067 | 0.016 | Delphi result is lower<br>than the predicate |
| General | | | |
| Input power | Power Supply: 110V–240V, 50/60<br>Hz<br>Power consumption: Maximum<br>1200VA<br>No isolation transformer | Power Supply via Isolation Transformer<br>Power Supply: 120V~, 50/60 Hz.<br>Power consumption: Maximum 800VA | Different; electrical<br>safety demonstrated<br>per IEC 60601-1 |
| Mechanical data | Dimensions (HxWxD):<br>210 x 440 x 500mm<br>Weight: 20 kg | Dimensions (HxWxD):<br>150 x 390 x 440mm<br>Weight: 20 kg | Similar; Delphi is<br>larger than the<br>predicate and has the<br>same weight |
| Console | Delphi consists of a power module and<br>a processor control module | MagPro R20 consists of a power module, a<br>processor module and built in displays. | Similar, however,<br>Delphi Stimulator does<br>not have a built-in<br>display. |
| User Interface | User interface located on a PC and<br>displays:<br>• Intensity display (%)<br>• Coil temperature<br>Menu display and indicators can<br>show:<br>• Repetition rate<br>• Pulses in train<br>• Number of trains<br>• Inter train interval<br>• System mode (inactive/active) | MagPro R20 has 2 displays<br>• Intensity display<br>• Coil temperature<br>Menu display and indicators can show:<br>• Repetition rate<br>• Pulses in train<br>• Number of trains<br>• Inter train interval<br>• Start delay<br>• Volume<br>• Status: enable/disable | Similar; Delphi<br>provides user control<br>over stimulation<br>output. |
#### 9 DISCUSSION
Based on the comparison presented in our submission, the Delphi Stimulator shares the same indications for use as its predicate, as both are intended to be used for stimulation of peripheral nerves for diagnostic purposes. Additionally, while some technological differences do exist between the Delphi Stimulator and its predicate, comprehensive testing have demonstrated that
{7}------------------------------------------------
| Quantalx<br>• Neuroscience • | Delphi Stimulator | |
|------------------------------|--------------------|----------------|
| | Traditional 510(k) | 510(k) Summary |
the device is substantially equivalent to its predicate and that the technological differences do not raise new safety and effectiveness concerns and support the company's substantial equivalency claim.
### 10 PERFORMANCE DATA
The Delphi Stimulator underwent successful nonclinical bench tests to establish substantially equivalent performance including EMC and electrical safety per IEC 60601-1 and IEC 60601-1-2, demonstration of compliance with IEC 60601-4-2, software validation, performance bench testing as well as comparative testing. The results of the bench testing support the safety profile of the device and demonstrate that the device functions as intended.
| Test | Test Method Summary | Results |
|------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Stimulator Output<br>Comparison to<br>Predicate | Stimulation output was measured in SMT<br>units (Electrical field) and compared to the<br>predicate (per FDA Class II Special<br>Controls Guidance Document: Repetitive<br>Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS)<br>Systems) | The obtained results demonstrated substantial<br>equivalency |
| System verification<br>testing | The device was operated at various<br>intensities to verify it functions as intended | No failures were observed; test passed. |
| ASCA test for basic<br>safety and essential<br>performance | Testing per IEC 60601-1 and IEC 60601-1-<br>2 | Pass |
| Software testing | Software testing per the requirement of the<br>software life cycle as defined in IEC<br>62304:2006 Amendment 2015 - Medical<br>device software - Software life cycle<br>processes. | Pass |
| Cybersecurity<br>assessment | Evaluation of threat per:<br>- FDA Guidance, Post-market<br>Management of Cybersecurity in<br>Medical Devices<br>- FDA Guidance, Cybersecurity in<br>Medical Devices: Quality System<br>Considerations and Content of<br>Premarket Submissions.<br>- AAMI TIR57:2016Principles for<br>Medical Device Security-Risk<br>Management<br>- FDA Guidance, Select Updates for the<br>Premarket Cybersecurity Guidance:<br>Section 524B of the FD&C Act | No vulnerabilities were found; labeling includes all<br>required elements addressing cybersecurity |
### 11 CONCLUSION
The Delphi Stimulator has similar intended use, technological characteristics, and principles of operation as the predicate. Any differences between the subject and predicate device were evaluated through design verification and validation testing and comparative testing which
{8}------------------------------------------------
| Quantalx<br>· Neuroscience · | Delphi Stimulator | |
|------------------------------|-------------------|--|
| Traditional 510(k) | 510(k) Summary | |
demonstrated device performance and safety, and do not raise any new questions of safety and effectiveness.
Based on the information submitted in this 510(k), the Delphi Stimulator is substantially equivalent to the currently marketed predicate MagPro R20.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.