K241762 · View Point Medical · NEU · Sep 16, 2024 · General, Plastic Surgery
Device Facts
Record ID
K241762
Device Name
OneMark
Applicant
View Point Medical
Product Code
NEU · General, Plastic Surgery
Decision Date
Sep 16, 2024
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 878.4300
Device Class
Class 2
Indications for Use
The OneMark Breast Localization Marker is intended to be placed percutaneously in soft tissue (>30 days) to mark a biopsy site or soft tissue intended for surgical removal. Using imaging guidance (such as ultrasound, MRI, or radiography) or detection imaging (OneMark Detection Imaging System), the OneMark Breast Localization Marker is located and may be surgically removed with the target tissue. The OneMark Detection Imaging System is intended only for the detection of the OneMark Breast Localization Marker.
Device Story
OneMark is an integrated localization system comprising a hydrogel pellet marker containing silica microspheres and an ultrasound-based Detection Imaging System. The marker is implanted percutaneously into soft tissue to mark a biopsy site or lesion. During surgery, the clinician uses the Detection Imaging System to locate the marker; the system processes ultrasound reflections from the silica microspheres to visualize the marker's location on a display console. This aids the surgeon in the precise resection of the marked tissue. The system is used intraoperatively in clinical settings. By providing clear localization of the target lesion, the device facilitates accurate surgical removal, potentially improving surgical outcomes and reducing the need for excessive tissue excision.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical data provided. Evidence consists of non-clinical bench testing, including biocompatibility (ISO 10993-1), sterilization validation (ANSI/AAMI/ISO 11137-2), shelf-life and packaging validation (ISTA 2A-2011, ASTM F2096-11), software validation (IEC 62304), electrical safety (IEC 60601-1, IEC 60601-2-37), EMC testing (IEC 60601-1-2), and GLP animal testing.
Technological Characteristics
System includes a hydrogel pellet marker with silica microspheres and an ultrasound-based detection console. Marker is passive; detection relies on ultrasound phase shift reflection. Materials include molded plastics and stainless steel. Sterilization via gamma radiation (SAL 10^-6). Connectivity/software components subject to IEC 62304, IEC 60601-1, and IEC 60601-2-37 standards.
Indications for Use
Indicated for percutaneous placement in soft tissue (>30 days) to mark biopsy sites or soft tissue intended for surgical removal in patients requiring breast lesion localization.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
An implantable clip is a clip-like device intended to connect internal tissues to aid healing. It is not absorbable.
Predicate Devices
Cianna Medical Scout Reflector and Scout System (K181007)
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image contains the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). On the left is the Department of Health & Human Services logo. To the right of that is the FDA logo, with the letters "FDA" in a blue square. Next to that is the text "U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION" in blue.
September 16, 2024
View Point Medical % Randy Prebula Partner Hogan Lovells US LLP 555 13th St. NW Washington, District of Columbia 20004
Re: K241762
Trade/Device Name: OneMark Regulation Number: 21 CFR 878.4300 Regulation Name: Implantable Clip Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: NEU Dated: June 18, 2024 Received: June 20, 2024
Dear Randy Prebula:
We have reviewed your section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database available at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Additional information about changes that may require a new premarket notification are provided in the FDA guidance documents entitled "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99812/download) and "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Software Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99785/download).
{1}------------------------------------------------
Your device is also subject to, among other requirements, the Quality System (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820), which includes, but is not limited to, 21 CFR 820.30, Design controls; 21 CFR 820.90, Nonconforming product; and 21 CFR 820.100, Corrective and preventive action. Please note that regardless of whether a change requires premarket review, the QS regulation requires device manufacturers to review and approve changes to device design and production (21 CFR 820.30 and 21 CFR 820.70) and document changes and approvals in the device master record (21 CFR 820.181).
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR Part 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reportingcombination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR Parts 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reportingmdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about mediation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advice-comprehensive-regulatoryassistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
> Sincerely, Digitally signed by Tek Tek N. N. Lamichhane -S Lamichhane -S Date: 2024.09.16 20:36:03 -04'00' Tek N. Lamichhane, Ph.D. Assistant Director DHT4B: Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Devices OHT4: Office of Surgical and Infection Control Devices Office of Product Evaluation and Quality Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Page
2
{2}------------------------------------------------
# Indications for Use
| Submission Number (if known) | K241762 |
|------------------------------|---------|
|------------------------------|---------|
Device Name
OneMark
Indications for Use (Describe)
The OneMark Breast Localization Marker is intended to be placed percutaneously in soft tissue (>30 days) to mark a biopsy site or soft tissue intended for surgical removal. Using imaging guidance (such as ultrasound, MRI, or radiography) or detection imaging (OneMark Detection Imaging System), the OneMark Breast Localization Marker is located and may be surgically removed with the target tissue. The OneMark Detection Imaging System is intended only for the detection of the OneMark Breast Localization Marker.
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
## CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
### *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW."
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
# 510(k) Summary
#### DATE PREPARED
August 27, 2024
#### MANUFACTURER AND 510(k) OWNER
View Point Medical, Inc. 6451 El Camino Real, Suite A, Carlsbad, CA 92009, USA Telephone: +1 (760) 707-7901 Official Contact: Tom Kane, Vice President RA/QA
#### REPRESENTATIVE/CONSULTANT
Randy Prebula Partner Hogan Lovells US LLP Telephone: +1 202 637 6548 Email: randy.prebula@hoganlovells.com
#### DEVICE INFORMATION
| Proprietary Name/Trade Name: | OneMark |
|------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------|
| Common Name: | Biopsy site marker |
| Regulation Number: | 21 CFR 878.4300 |
| Class: | II |
| Product Code: | NEU |
| Premarket Review: | OHT4/ Plastic Surgery and Reconstructive Devices |
| | (DHT4B) |
| Review Panel: | General & Plastic Surgery |
#### PREDICATE DEVICE IDENTIFICATION
OneMark is substantially equivalent to the following predicates:
| 510(k) Number | Predicate Device Name / Manufacturer | Predicate |
|---------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------|
| K181007 | Cianna Medical Scout Reflector and Scout System /<br>Cianna Medical, Inc. | Primary predicate |
| K190689 | SignalMark Breast Marker / View Point Medical, Inc. | Reference device |
| K212158 | HydroMARK Breast Biopsy Site Marker / Devicor<br>Medical Products, Inc. | Reference device |
The predicate devices have not been subject to a design related recall.
{4}------------------------------------------------
#### DEVICE DESCRIPTION
OneMark is an integrated localization system consisting of the OneMark Detection Imaging System and the OneMark Breast Localization Marker preloaded in an injector device. The OneMark Detection Imaging System is an ultrasound-based intraoperative inspection tool used by clinicians to localize the OneMark Breast Localization Marker, a hydrogel pellet implanted in tissue to mark the site of a lesion. The primary goal of the system is to aid a surgeon in resection of a marked cancer lesion. The system may be used to inspect the marked tissue in all typical workflow situations from initial implant post-biopsy through resection and ex-vivo specimen review.
#### INDICATIONS FOR USE
The OneMark Breast Localization Marker is intended to be placed percutaneously in soft tissue (>30 days) to mark a biopsy site or soft tissue intended for surgical removal. Using imaging guidance (such as ultrasound, MRI, or radiography) or detection imaging (OneMark Detection Imaging System), the OneMark Breast Localization Marker is located and may be surgically removed with the target tissue. The OneMark Detection Imaging System is intended only for the detection of the OneMark Breast Localization Marker.
#### COMPARISON OF TECHNOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS
View Point Medical believes that OneMark is substantially equivalent to the predicate devices based on the information summarized here:
The subject device has the same intended use as the primary predicate. Both the subject device and the primary predicate are intended as an aid in resecting a marked cancer lesion by providing a marker to be implanted in the suspected tissue and a detection system for the implanted marker during resection surgery.
The subject device has a similar design as the primary predicate. Both the subject device and the primary predicate feature similar components to achieve the intended effect: a marker, a marker delivery system, a handpiece/probe and a display console. The subject device has similar materials for the delivery system, the handpiece/probe and the display console components as the primary predicate device (e.g., molded plastics, stainless steel).
The main technological differences of OneMark, as compared to the primary predicate, are:
- . Type of energy/Principle of operation. OneMark Breast Marker is a passive implant that includes silica microspheres as compared to a micro-impulse radar (SAVI Scout System). The silica microspheres do not emit any form of energy. Instead, they reflect a phase shift when exposed to ultrasound energy which can be processed into a vibrant color image to visualize the marker's location. The amount of ultrasound energy necessary for the OneMark Detection System to locate the OneMark Breast Marker is similar to the amount of ultrasound energy necessary to locate the reference predicate marker
{5}------------------------------------------------
(SignalMark Breast Marker). This difference with the primary predicate does not introduce any new or different questions of safety and effectiveness.
- Marker materials. Materials for the marker component of the subject device are different than for the primary predicate device but are similar to the materials for the reference devices (SignalMark Breast Marker, HydroMARK Breast Biopsy Site Marker). Materials for the OneMark Breast Marker have undergone testing to ensure the marker is as safe and effective as the predicate markers (SAVI Scout Reflector, SignalMark Breast Marker, HydroMARK Breast Biopsy Site Marker).
- . Marker dimensions. The marker for the subject device is smaller in size than the marker for the primary predicate device, but its dimensions are similar to the dimensions of the reference predicate marker (HydroMARK Breast Biopsy Site Marker). This difference with the primary predicate does not introduce any new or different questions of safety and effectiveness.
- . Marker sterilization. Gamma radiation was used to achieve a SAL of 10° for the Marker, compared to ethylene oxide for the primary predicate. Gamma radiation method was also used for the reference device (SignalMark Breast Marker).
These technological differences have undergone testing to ensure the subject device is as safe and effective as the predicate device.
## SUMMARY OF NON-CLINICAL TESTING
The following tests were performed to demonstrate safety based on current industry standards:
- Biocompatibility testing per ISO 10993-1
- Gamma radiation sterilization validation per ANSI/AAMI/ISO 11137-2
- Shelf-life validation testing
- Packaging validation testing per ISTA 2A-2011 and ASTM F2096-11
- Software testing per IEC 62304
- Electrical safety testing per IEC 60601-1 and IEC 60601-2-37
- EMC testing per IEC 60601-1-2
- Non-clinical performance bench testing
- GLP animal testing
The results of these tests indicate that OneMark is substantially equivalent to the predicate devices.
### CONCLUSION
Based on the testing performed, including sterilization, packaging and shelf-life validation, biocompatibility, software validation, electrical safety, EMC testing, non-clinical performance bench testing, and GLP animal testing, it can be concluded that the subject device (OneMark Biopsy Site Marker — K241762) does not raise new issues of safety or effectiveness compared to the predicate device (Cianna Medical Scout Reflector and Scout System – K181007). The indications for use, technological characteristics, and performance characteristics for the proposed OneMark are assessed to be substantially equivalent to the predicate device.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.