The Stryker Global Modular Replacement System, Modular Replacement System and Modular Rotating Hinge Knee Component are sterile, single-use devices intended for use in situations where there is a need for replacement of bone due to radical bone loss. This loss can be related to oncology, trauma or failed previous prosthesis. Specific Indications for Use are listed below.
Device Story
Modular orthopedic system for extensive bone reconstruction of femur and proximal tibia; used in oncology, trauma, and revision arthroplasty. Components include stemmed femoral/tibial parts, intercalary segments, and rotating hinge knee assembly (bushings/axle). Used in clinical/surgical settings by orthopedic surgeons. Devices replace diseased or damaged bone segments to restore limb function. System is modular, allowing surgeon to assemble components intraoperatively to match patient anatomy. Output is a structural prosthetic replacement. Benefits include limb salvage and restoration of joint stability in cases of severe bone loss.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical data required or provided. Substantial equivalence is based on identical technological characteristics and design to the predicate device.
Technological Characteristics
Modular orthopedic prosthesis system. Materials and design are identical to predicate. Components include stemmed femoral/tibial segments, intercalary pieces, and rotating hinge knee assembly. Sterile, single-use. Intended for use with bone cement (for specific components).
Indications for Use
Indicated for patients requiring extensive reconstruction of femur/proximal tibia due to radical bone loss from oncology (tumor resection), acute trauma, or revision of failed arthroplasty. Includes limb salvage procedures, prosthetic knee fusion, and total femoral replacement. Contraindications not explicitly listed beyond general device labeling updates.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A hip joint metal/polymer semi-constrained cemented prosthesis is a device intended to be implanted to replace a hip joint. The device limits translation and rotation in one or more planes via the geometry of its articulating surfaces. It has no linkage across-the-joint. This generic type of device includes prostheses that have a femoral component made of alloys, such as cobalt-chromium-molybdenum, and an acetabular resurfacing component made of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene and is limited to those prostheses intended for use with bone cement (§ 888.3027).
Predicate Devices
Global Modular Replacement System, Modular Replacement System, Modular Rotating Hinge Knee (K222056)
HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS MODULAR ROTATING HINGE KNEE (K002552)
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The logo consists of two parts: the Department of Health & Human Services logo on the left and the FDA logo on the right. The FDA logo is a blue square with the letters "FDA" in white, followed by the words "U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION" in blue.
August 2, 2024
Howmedica Osteonics Corp. dba Stryker Orthopaedics Julia Bally Regulatory Affairs Senior Specialist 325 Corporate Drive Mahwah, New Jersey 07430
Re: K241716
Trade/Device Name: Global Modular Replacement System, Modular Replacement System, Modular Rotating Hinge Knee Component Regulation Number: 21 CFR 888.3350 Regulation Name: Hip joint metal/polymer semi-constrained cemented prosthesis Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: JDI, KRO, LPH, LZO Dated: June 14, 2024 Received: June 14, 2024
Dear Julia Bally:
We have reviewed your section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database available at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
{1}------------------------------------------------
Additional information about changes that may require a new premarket notification are provided in the FDA guidance documents entitled "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99812/download) and "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Software Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99785/download).
Your device is also subject to, among other requirements, the Quality System (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820), which includes, but is not limited to, 21 CFR 820.30. Design controls; 21 CFR 820.90. Nonconforming product; and 21 CFR 820.100, Corrective and preventive action. Please note that regardless of whether a change requires premarket review, the QS regulation requires device manufacturers to review and approve changes to device design and production (21 CFR 820.30 and 21 CFR 820.70) and document changes and approvals in the device master record (21 CFR 820.181).
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR Part 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reportingcombination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR Parts 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reportingmdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
{2}------------------------------------------------
For comprehensive regulatory information about mediation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-
assistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
# Limin Sun -S
Limin Sun, Ph.D. Assistant Director DHT6A: Division of Joint Arthroplasty Devices OHT6: Office of Orthopedic Devices Office of Product Evaluation and Quality Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{3}------------------------------------------------
Submission Number (if known)
K241716
Device Name
Global Modular Replacement System, Modular Replacement System, Modular Rotating Hinge Knee Component
Indications for Use (Describe)
Indications for the MRS Stems and Intercalary Stems presented in K952970:
This device is intended for use in patients requiring extensive reconstruction of the femur and/or proximal tibia, including the hip or knee joint, resulting from extensive bone loss. Tumor resection for skeletal lesions (Oncology patients where radical bone resection and replacement may be required), revision surgery for failed arthroplasty, and acute trauma are the primary causes of extensive bone loss. These prostheses are intended for use with bone cement.
The Intercalary System is intended for use in situations arising from in femoral mid-shaft tumor resection, or for prosthetic knee fusion.
Indications for the Global Modular Replacement System (presented in K023087):
Femoral and/or proximal tibial replacement and total femoral replacement in Oncology cases where radical resection and replacement of bone is required, and in limb salvage procedures where radical resection and replacement of the bone is required. Limb salvage procedures would include surgical intervention for severe trauma, failed previous prosthesis, and/or Oncology indications.
Indications for the GMRS Anteverted Proximal Femoral Component (presented in K032581):
Femoral replacement in Oncology cases where radical resection and replacement of bone is required, and in limb salvage procedures where radical resection and replacement of bone is required. Limb salvage procedures would include surgical intervention for severe trauma, failed previous prosthesis, and/or Oncology indications. This component may also be used with the Distal Femoral segment components of the GMRS in total femoral replacement.
Indications for the Global Modular Replacement System Press Fit Stems with HA Coating (presented in K022403, and K031217):
Proximal femoral reconstruction secondary to:
- o Trauma
- o Failed previous prosthesis
- o Tumor resection
Indications for the Modular Replacement System Cemented Stems (presented in K040749):
Femoral and/or proximal tibial replacement due to:
{4}------------------------------------------------
| o Trauma |
|------------------------------|
| o Failed previous prosthesis |
| o Tumor resection |
Indications for the Modular Rotating Hinge Knee System (cleared in K002552)
The Modular Rotating Hinge Knee System is intended for use with bone cement in cases where
there is destruction of the joint surfaces, with or without significant bone deformity; the cruciate and/
or collateral ligaments do not stabilize the knee joint; the ligaments are inadequate and/or the
musculature is weak; and revision of a failed previous prosthesis where there is instability, with or
without bone loss or inadequate soft tissue.
Expanded indications include for use with bone cement in situations where there is extensive bone
loss, including limb salvage procedures for severe trauma, failed previous prosthesis, and/or
Oncology indications.
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
| <span style="unicode-bidi:isolate; direction:ltr">☑</span> Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) | <span style="unicode-bidi:isolate; direction:ltr">☐</span> Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C) |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
***DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.***
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the
time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete
and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect
of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
Department of Health and Human Services
Food and Drug Administration
Food and Drug Administration
Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of
information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{5}------------------------------------------------
#### 510(k) Summary
| Sponsor | Stryker Orthopaedics<br>325 Corporate Drive<br>Mahwah, NJ 07430 |
|----------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Contact Person | Julia Bally<br>Regulatory Affairs Senior Specalist<br>Howmedica Osteonics Corp<br>325 Corporate Drive<br>Mahwah, NJ 07430<br>201-831-6265<br>Julia.Bally@stryker.com |
| Alternate Contact | Shing Jen Tai<br>Principal Regulatory Affairs Specialist<br>Howmedica Osteonics Corp<br>325 Corporate Drive<br>Mahwah, NJ 07430<br>269-800-2088<br>shingjen.tai@stryker.com |
| Date Prepared: | 14-June-2024 |
| Proprietary Name: | Global Modular Replacement System, Modular Replacement System,<br>Modular Rotating Hinge Knee Component |
| Common Name: | Hip Replacement, Rotating Hinge Knee Replacement |
| Classification Name: | Hip joint metal/polymer semi-constrained cemented prosthesis. (21<br>CFR § 888.3350)<br>Knee joint femorotibial metal/polymer constrained cemented |
Primary Predicate Device to Which Substantial Equivalence is Claimed: Submission Number: K222056 Device Name: Global Modular Replacement System, Modular Replacement System, Modular Rotating Hinge Knee Product Codes: JDI, KRO, LPH, LZO
uncemented prosthesis (21 CFR § 888.3358)
prosthesis (21 CFR § 888.3510)
JDI, KRO,LPH, LZO
Product Codes:
Hip joint metal/polymer/metal semi-constrained porous-coated
Hip joint metal/ceramic/polymer semi-constrained cemented or
nonporous uncemented prosthesis.( 21CFR § 888.3353)
{6}------------------------------------------------
| Submission Number | Device Name | Product Codes |
|-------------------|----------------------------------------------------|---------------|
| K233261 | Global Modular Replacement System | JDI, KRO, LPH |
| K023087 | Global Modular Replacement System | KRO, JDI |
| K952970 | Modular Replacement System | JDI, KRO |
| K032581 | GMRS Anteverted Proximal Femoral Component | LPH |
| K040749 | Modular Replacement System Cemented Stems | KRO |
| K022403 | GMRS PRESS FIT STEMS WITH PUREFIX HA | LZO |
| K031217 | GMRS PRESS FIT STEMS WITH PUREFIX HA | LZO |
| K002552 | HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS MODULAR<br>ROTATING HINGE KNEE | KRO |
# Additional Predicate Device Used to Support Substantial Equivalence:
# Reason for 510(k) Submission:
The purpose of this "Change Being Effected" bundled submission is to add a contraindication to the labeling of the subject Global Modular Replacement System, Modular Replacement System, and Modular Rotating Hinge Knee Component. Additionally, MRI Safety information is being updated to align with the example labeling provided in the FDA guidance document "Testing and Labeling Medical Devices for Safety in the Magnetic Resonance (MR) Environment" (dated October 10, 2023), and clerical updates are also being made to the IFUs.
# Device Description:
The Global Modular Replacement System (GMRS) is comprised of a number of components that are intended to be used in conjunction with each other, or in conjunction with components of the Modular Replacement System (MRS) or the Modular Rotating Hinge Knee System (MRH). The Modular Rotating Hinge Knee System is a tricompartmental knee system. The system consists of a stemmed femoral component and a stemmed tibial bearing component connected by a set of bushings and an axle. The MRH Tibial Rotating component is a part of the MRH system and mates with the GMRS Standard Proximal Tibia. These devices are intended to be used in clinical situations where there is radical bone loss of the femur and/or proximal tibia. This radical bone loss can be related to oncology (tumor), trauma or failed previous prosthesis.
#### Intended Use:
The Stryker Global Modular Replacement System, Modular Replacement System and Modular Rotating Hinge Knee Component are sterile, single-use devices
intended for use in situations where there is a need for replacement of bone due to radical bone
{7}------------------------------------------------
loss. This loss can be related to oncology, trauma or failed previous prosthesis. Specific Indications for Use are listed below.
#### Indications:
Indications for the MRS Stems and Intercalary Stems (presented in K952970):
- This device is intended for use in patients requiring extensive reconstruction of the femur . and/or proximal tibia, including the hip or knee joint, resulting from extensive bone loss. Tumor resection for skeletal lesions (Oncology patients where radical bone resection and replacement may be required), revision surgery for failed arthroplasty, and acute trauma are the primary causes of extensive bone loss. These prostheses are intended for use with bone cement.
- The Intercalary System is intended for use in situations arising from femoral mid-shaft tumor resection, or for prosthetic knee fusion.
Indications for the Global Modular Replacement System (presented in K023087):
- Femoral and/or proximal tibial replacement and total femoral replacement in Oncology cases where radical resection and replacement of bone is required, and in limb salvage procedures where radical resection and replacement of the bone is required. Limb salvage procedures would include surgical intervention for severe trauma, failed previous prosthesis, and/or Oncology indications.
Indications for the GMRS Anteverted Proximal Femoral Component (presented in K032581):
- Femoral replacement in Oncology cases where radical resection and replacement of bone is required, and in limb salvage procedures where radical resection and replacement of bone is required. Limb salvage procedures would include surgical intervention for severe trauma, failed previous prosthesis, and/or Oncology indications. This component may also be used with the Distal Femoral segment components of the GMRS in total femoral replacement.
Indications for the Global Modular Replacement System Press Fit Stems with HA Coating (presented in K022403, and K031217):
Proximal femoral reconstruction secondary to:
o Trauma o Failed previous prosthesis o Tumor resection
●
●
Indications for the Modular Replacement System Cemented Stems (presented in K040749):
Femoral and/or proximal tibial replacement due to: o Trauma
o Failed previous prosthesis
o Tumor resection
Indications for the Modular Rotating Hinge Knee System (presented in K002552):
{8}------------------------------------------------
- The Modular Rotating Hinge Knee System is intended for use with bone cement in cases where there is destruction of the joint surfaces, with or without significant bone deformity; the cruciate and/or collateral ligaments do not stabilize the knee joint; the ligaments are inadequate and/or the musculature is weak; and revision of a failed previous prosthesis where there is instability, with or without bone loss or inadequate soft tissue. Expanded indications include for use with bone cement in situations where there is extensive bone loss, including limb salvage procedures for severe trauma, failed previous prosthesis, and/or Oncology indications.
### Summary of Technological Characteristics:
Technological characteristics of the subject devices are identical to those of the predicate devices identified in this submission. The labeling updates in this submission have no impact on the technological characteristics of the subject and predicate devices.
#### Non-Clinical Testing:
Non-Clinical testing was not required as a basis for substantial equivalence.
### Clinical Testing:
Clinical testing was not required as a basis for substantial equivalence.
#### Conclusion:
Based upon a comparison of the intended use, indications for use, design, materials, sterilization, technological characteristics, and operational principles, the subject devices are substantially equivalent to the predicate devices identified in this premarket notification.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.