K240927 · Beckman Coulter, Inc. · MSW · Jun 28, 2024 · Immunology
Device Facts
Record ID
K240927
Device Name
Access Thyroglobulin
Applicant
Beckman Coulter, Inc.
Product Code
MSW · Immunology
Decision Date
Jun 28, 2024
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 866.6010
Device Class
Class 2
Indications for Use
Access Thyroglobulin assay is a paramagnetic particle, chemiluminescent immunoassay for the quantitative determination of thyroglobulin levels in human serum and plasma using the Access Immunoassay Systems. This device is intended to aid in monitoring for the presence of persistent or recurrent/metastatic disease in patients who have differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) and have had thyroid surgery (with or without ablative therapy), and who lack serum thyroglobulin antibodies.
Device Story
Access Thyroglobulin is a quantitative, chemiluminescent immunoassay for measuring thyroglobulin in human serum and plasma. The device uses a simultaneous one-step sandwich immunoenzymatic principle. Input samples are mixed with biotinylated anti-thyroglobulin antibodies on streptavidin-coated paramagnetic particles and a monoclonal anti-thyroglobulin-alkaline phosphatase conjugate. After incubation, a magnetic field retains bound materials while unbound components are washed away. Lumi-Phos PRO substrate is added; the resulting chemiluminescent light, measured by a luminometer on the DxI 9000 Access Immunoassay Analyzer, is directly proportional to thyroglobulin concentration. The system calculates analyte levels using a stored multi-point calibration curve. Used in clinical laboratories by trained personnel, the output provides clinicians with serial thyroglobulin measurements to monitor DTC disease status. The modification involves replacing the previous substrate (Lumi-Phos 530) with Lumi-Phos PRO to maintain performance on the DxI 9000 platform.
Clinical Evidence
No new clinical studies were performed. Substantial equivalence is supported by analytical performance data, including precision (within-laboratory CVs 2.5-8.4%), linearity (0.03–642.23 ng/mL), and a method comparison study (N=187) against the predicate device showing a slope of 0.996 and correlation coefficient of 0.999. Clinical performance relies on previously established data (K002905).
Technological Characteristics
Sandwich immunoassay; paramagnetic particles coated with streptavidin; biotinylated mouse monoclonal anti-thyroglobulin antibodies; alkaline phosphatase conjugate; Lumi-Phos PRO substrate; automated chemiluminescent detection; measuring range 0.1–500 ng/mL; sample volume 45 µL; reagents include TRIS/HEPES buffers, bovine/murine proteins, sodium azide, ProClin 300.
Indications for Use
Indicated for monitoring persistent, recurrent, or metastatic disease in patients with differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) post-thyroid surgery (with/without ablation) who lack serum thyroglobulin antibodies (TgAb). Contraindicated for patients with serum TgAb.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A tumor-associated antigen immunological test system is a device that consists of reagents used to qualitatively or quantitatively measure, by immunochemical techniques, tumor-associated antigens in serum, plasma, urine, or other body fluids. This device is intended as an aid in monitoring patients for disease progress or response to therapy or for the detection of recurrent or residual disease.
Special Controls
*Classification.* Class II (special controls). Tumor markers must comply with the following special controls: (1) A guidance document entitled “Guidance Document for the Submission of Tumor Associated Antigen Premarket Notifications (510(k)s) to FDA,” and (2) voluntary assay performance standards issued by the National Committee on Clinical Laboratory Standards.
{0}
**FDA** U.S. FOOD & DRUG
ADMINISTRATION
# **510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION
DECISION SUMMARY
ASSAY ONLY**
# **I Background Information:**
# **A 510(k) Number**
K240927
# **B Applicant**
Beckman Coulter, Inc
# **C Proprietary and Established Names**
Access Thyroglobulin
# **D Regulatory Information**
| Product Code(s) | Classification | Regulation Section | Panel |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| MSW | Class II | 21 CFR 866.6010 - Tumor-Associated Antigen Immunological Test System | IM - Immunology |
# **II Submission/Device Overview:**
# **A Purpose for Submission:**
Modification of previously cleared device – the change of substrate for the assay on the Dxl 9000 Access Immunoassay Analyzer
# **B Measurand:**
Thyroglobulin (Tg)
# **C Type of Test:**
Quantitative, Chemiluminescent Immunoassay
Food and Drug Administration
10903 New Hampshire Avenue
Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
www.fda.gov
{1}
### III Intended Use/Indications for Use:
#### A Intended Use(s):
Access Thyroglobulin assay is a paramagnetic particle, chemiluminescent immunoassay for the quantitative determination of thyroglobulin levels in human serum and plasma using the Access Immunoassay Systems. This device is intended to aid in monitoring for the presence of persistent or recurrent/metastatic disease in patients who have differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) and have had thyroid surgery (with or without ablative therapy), and who lack serum thyroglobulin antibodies.
#### B Indication(s) for Use:
Same as Indended Use
#### C Special Conditions for Use Statement(s):
Rx - For Prescription Use Only
For In Vitro Diagnostic Use Only
The Instruction for Use of the device contains the following warnings:
The presence of serum autoantibodies to thyroglobulin (TgAb) can interfere with assays for thyroglobulin (Tg). Therefore, sera which contain TgAb, even at very low levels, should not be tested for Tg.
The concentration of thyroglobulin in a given specimen determined with assays from different manufacturers can vary due to differences in assay methods and reagent specificity. The results reported by the laboratory to the physician must include the identity of the Tg assay used. Values obtained with different assay methods cannot be used interchangeably. If, in the course of monitoring a patient, the assay method used for determining Tg levels serially is changed, additional sequential testing should be carried out to confirm baseline values.
#### D Special Instrument Requirements:
DxI 9000 Access Immunoassay Analyzer (K221225)
### IV Device/System Characteristics:
#### A Device Description:
Each Access Thyroglobulin reagent kit contains two reagent packs (50 tests/pack). Each pack contains the following:
- R1a (3.25 mL): Dynabeads paramagnetic particles coated with streptavidin and coupled to biotinylated mouse monoclonal antithyroglobulin antibodies in TRIS buffer with protein (bovine) and preservatives
K240927 - Page 2 of 9
{2}
- R1b (3.10 mL): Mouse monoclonal anti-thyroglobulin-alkaline phosphatase (bovine) conjugate in a TRIS buffer with protein (bovine, murine) and preservatives
- R1c (3.10 mL): HEPES buffer with protein (bovine, murine) and preservatives
Materials needed but not supplied:
- Access Thyroglobulin Calibrators: Six levels (0, 1.0, 10, 100, 250, and 500 ng/mL)
- Quality Control Materials: commercial control material
- Substrate: Lumi-Phos PRO
- Unicel DxI Wash Buffer II
- Access Thyroglobulin Sample Diluent (optional)
The modification of the Access Thyroglobulin is to replace substrate (Lumi-Phos 530) of the Access Thyroglobulin with a new substrate (Lumi-Phos PRO) on the DxI 9000 Access Immunoassay Analyzer.
# **B Principle of Operation:**
The Access Thyroglobulin assay is a simultaneous one-step immunoenzymatic (“sandwich”) assay. A sample is added to a reaction vessel with four biotinylated anti-thyroglobulin antibodies coated on streptavidin paramagnetic particles, and monoclonal anti-thyroglobulin antibody alkaline phosphatase conjugate. The thyroglobulin in the sample binds to the biotinylated antibodies on the solid phase, while the conjugate antibody reacts with a different antigenic site on the thyroglobulin molecule. After incubation in a reaction vessel, materials bound to the solid phase are held in a magnetic field while unbound materials are washed away. Then, the chemiluminescent substrate is added to the vessel and light generated by the reaction is measured with a luminometer. The light production is directly proportional to the concentration of thyroglobulin in the sample. The amount of analyte in the sample is determined from a stored, multi-point calibration curve.
# **V Substantial Equivalence Information:**
# **A Predicate Device Name(s):**
Access Thyroglobulin
# **B Predicate 510(k) Number(s):**
K220972
K241423
# **C Comparison with Predicate(s):**
K240927 - Page 3 of 9
{3}
| **Device & Predicate Device(s):** | **K240927 (Candidate)** | **K241423 (Predicate)** | **K220972 (Predicate)** |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Device Trade Name | Access Thyroglobulin | Access Thyroglobulin | Access Thyroglobulin |
| **General Device Characteristic Similarities** | | | |
| Intended Use/ Indications for Use | Access Thyroglobulin assay is a paramagnetic particle, chemiluminescent immunoassay for the quantitative determination of thyroglobulin levels in human serum and plasma using the Access Immunoassay Systems. This device is intended to aid in monitoring for the presence of persistent or recurrent/metastatic disease in patients who have differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) and have had thyroid surgery (with or without ablative therapy), and who lack serum thyroglobulin antibodies. | Access Thyroglobulin assay is a paramagnetic particle, chemiluminescent immunoassay for the quantitative determination of thyroglobulin levels in human plasma using the Access Immunoassay Systems. This device is intended to aid in monitoring for the presence of persistent or recurrent/metastatic disease in patients who have differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) and have had thyroid surgery (with or without ablative therapy), and who lack serum thyroglobulin antibodies. | Access Thyroglobulin assay is a paramagnetic particle, chemiluminescent immunoassay for the quantitative determination of thyroglobulin levels in human serum using the Access Immunoassay Systems. This device is intended to aid in monitoring for the presence of persistent or recurrent/metastatic disease in patients who have differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) and have had thyroid surgery (with or without ablative therapy), and who lack serum thyroglobulin antibodies. |
| Analyte | Thyroglobulin | Same | Same |
| Technology | Chemiluminescent | Same | Same |
| Method | Automated | Same | Same |
| Antibodies | Mouse monoclonal antibodies | Same | Same |
| Assay Architecture | Biotinylated mouse monoclonal anti-thyroglobulin antibodies pre-coupled to paramagnetic particles coated with streptavidin. | Same | Same |
| Assay Throughput | ~42 minutes | Same | Same |
| Measuring Range | 0.1 – 500 ng/mL | Same | Same |
K240927 - Page 4 of 9
{4}
| General Device Characteristic Differences | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Sample Matrix | Serum and Plasma (heparin) | Plasma (heparin) | Serum |
| Sample Volume | 45 μL | 40 μL | |
| Substrate | Lumi-Phos PRO substrate | Access Substrate (Lumi-Phos 530) | |
| Instrument | DxI 9000 Access Immunoassay Analyzer | Access 2 Immunoassay Analyzer | |
### VI Standards/Guidance Documents Referenced:
The following Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guideline was used:
- CLSI EP05-A3: Evaluation of Precision Performance of Quantitative Measurement Methods; Approved Guideline – Third Edition
- CLSI EP06-2nd Edition-: Evaluation of the Linearity of Quantitative Measurement Procedures: A Statistical Approach; Approved Guideline
- CLSI EP09c 3rd Edition: Measurement Procedure Comparison and Bias Estimation Using Patient Samples; Third Edition
- CLSI EP17-A2: Evaluation of Detection Capability for Clinical Laboratory Measurement Procedures; Approved Guideline – Second Edition
### VII Performance Characteristics (if/when applicable):
#### A Analytical Performance:
##### 1. Precision/Reproducibility:
Precision testing was performed in accordance with CLSI guideline EP05-A3.
###### a) With-in Laboratory Precision:
The within-laboratory precision was evaluated using three reagent lots and three DxI 9000 Access Immunoassay Analyzers. Six levels of human serum samples in a minimum of two replicates per run, two runs per day for 20 days, resulting in a minimum of 80 datapoints for each sample per reagent lot per instrument. The data were analyzed for repeatability (within-run), between-run, between-day, and within-laboratory precision. The mean (ng/mL), standard deviation (SD) (ng/mL) and percent coefficient of variation (%CV) were calculated for each sample. The representative data of within-laboratory precision using one lot of reagents on one instrument are summarized in the table below.
K240927 - Page 5 of 9
{5}
| Sample | Mean (ng/mL) | N | Within-Run | | Between-Run | | Between-Day | | Within-Laboratory | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | | SD | % CV | SD | % CV | SD | % CV | SD | % CV |
| 1 | 0.3 | 88 | 0.02 | 5.4 | 0.01 | 4.7 | 0.01 | 4.4 | 0.02 | 8.4 |
| 2 | 5.5 | 88 | 0.26 | 4.7 | 0.26 | 4.7 | 0.09 | 1.6 | 0.38 | 6.8 |
| 3 | 22 | 88 | 0.95 | 4.4 | 0.88 | 4.1 | 0.41 | 1.9 | 1.36 | 6.3 |
| 4 | 111 | 80 | 2.22 | 2.0 | 0.64 | 0.6 | 1.47 | 1.3 | 2.74 | 2.5 |
| 5 | 376 | 80 | 8.91 | 2.4 | 5.04 | 1.3 | 9.06 | 2.4 | 13.67 | 3.6 |
| 6 | 417 | 80 | 8.82 | 2.1 | 6.25 | 1.5 | 10.13 | 2.4 | 14.82 | 3.6 |
# b) Lot-to-Lot Precision
The lot-to-lot precision of Lumi-Phos PRO Substrate was assessed in K223921.
The lot-to-lot precision of the modified Access Thyroglobulin reagent was evaluated using three reagent lots on the DxI 9000 Access Immunoassay Analyzer. Serum samples at different concentrations were tested in five replicates per run, one run per day over five days, resulting N=75 datapoints per sample on one instrument. The same study was also performed on two additional instruments. The data were analyzed for within-run, between-day, and between-lot, and total precision. Across three instruments, the CV% for reagent lot-to-lot imprecision is ≤ 6.6% for all samples tested.
# c) Instrument-to-Instrument Precision:
The study was performed by testing six serum samples at different concentrations on three DxI 9000 Access Immunoassay Analyzers. Each sample was tested in five replicates per run, one run per day over five days, resulting in minimum N=75 datapoints using one lot of reagents. The same study was also performed on two additional reagent lots. The representative data of instrument-to-instrument reproducibility are summarized in the table below on one representative reagent lot are summarized in the table below.
| Sample | Mean (ng/mL) | N | Within-Run | | Between-Day | | Between-Instrument | | Total | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV |
| 1 | 0.34 | 75 | 0.02 | 5.9 | 0.02 | 4.5 | 0.00 | 0.0 | 0.03 | 7.4 |
| 2 | 6.2 | 75 | 0.20 | 3.2 | 0.09 | 1.5 | 0.18 | 2.9 | 0.28 | 4.6 |
| 3 | 21 | 75 | 0.82 | 3.9 | 0.49 | 2.3 | 0.69 | 3.3 | 1.18 | 5.7 |
| 4 | 109 | 75 | 2.98 | 2.7 | 1.62 | 1.5 | 0.92 | 0.8 | 3.51 | 3.2 |
| 5 | 370 | 75 | 11.84 | 3.2 | 6.37 | 1.7 | 13.31 | 3.6 | 18.92 | 5.1 |
| 6 | 402 | 75 | 10.18 | 2.5 | 13.09 | 3.3 | 16.94 | 4.2 | 23.70 | 5.9 |
# 2. Linearity:
A linearity study of the modified Access Thyroglobulin assay on the DxI 9000 Access Immunoassay Analyzer was performed in accordance with CLSI EP06-Ed2. Three linearity dilution series were prepared by mixing High and Low native serum samples. The first dilution series included seven dilution samples covering the range of 0.03 – 14.76 ng/mL.
K240927 - Page 6 of 9
{6}
The second dilution series included eight dilution samples covering the range of 0.03 – 87.52 ng/mL. The third dilution series included seven dilution samples covering the range of 0.03 – 642.23 ng/mL. For all three-dilution series, the lowest samples were tested in replicates of eight, while all other samples were tested in replicates of four on one DxI 9000 Access Immunoassay Analyzer using one modified Access Thyroglobulin reagent lot. For each level, the mean of the measured values, predicted value and the percent deviation from linearity were calculated. The data sets from the three series were also combined for a single linearity analysis. The results are summarized in the tables below.
| Dilution Range (ng/mL) | Slope (95% CI) | Intercept (95% CI) | R2 | % Deviation from Linearity |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 0.03 – 14.76 | 0.948 (0.937, 0.958) | 0.002 (-0.001, 0.004) | 0.998 | -3.8 – 5.5 |
| 0.03 – 87.52 | 1.003 (0.991, 1.015) | -0.000 (-0.002, 0.002) | 0.998 | -3.1 – 1.8 |
| 0.03 – 642.23 | 0.977 (0.969, 0.986) | 0.001 (-0.001, 0.002) | 0.999 | -3.2 – 2.3 |
| All Combined (0.03 – 642.23) | 0.976 (0.969, 0.983) | 0.001 (-0.001, 0.002) | 1.000 | -6.6 – 4.1 |
The data support the linearity interval from 0.03 to 642.23 ng/mL with the % deviations from linearity within ±10%. The study results support the linearity of the claimed analytical measuring interval (AMI): 0.1 – 500 ng/mL.
# 3. Analytical Specificity/Interference:
Refer to K220972
# 4. Assay Reportable Range:
The assay reportable range for the Access Thyroglobulin is the same as the claimed AMI: 0.1–500 ng/mL.
# 5. Traceability, Stability, Expected Values (Controls, Calibrators, or Methods):
# a) Traceability:
The traceability was established in K002905. There is no change to the traceability of the modified Access Thyroglobulin.
# b) Stability:
The Access Thyroglobulin Reagent kit and the Lumi-Phos PRO substrate are packaged separately. Access Thyroglobulin Reagent kit stability was established in K220972. The proposed change is to replace the substrate (Lumi-Phos 530) with a new substrate (Lumi-Phos PRO) for the assay run on DxI 9000 Access Immunoassay Analyzer. The shelf-life
K240927 - Page 7 of 9
{7}
claims and on-board stability claims of Lumi-Phos PRO substrate were established in K221225.
# 6. Detection Limit:
The Limit of Blank (LoB), Limit of Detection (LoD) and Limit of Quantitation (LoQ) of the modified Access Thyroglobulin on the DxI 9000 Access Immunoassay Analyzer were determined based on the CLSI guideline EP17-A2.
# a) LoB:
The LoB was determined by testing five thyroglobulin-depleted individual native serum samples using two modified Access Thyroglobulin reagent lots on two DxI 9000 Access Immunoassay Analyzers. Samples were run in five replicates per run, one run per day, for three days on one DxI 9000 Access Immunoassay Analyzer, resulting in 75 replicates for each reagent lot on each instrument. LoB was defined as the value corresponding to the 95th percentile of the rank position of the distribution of values. This resulted in the LoB value of 0.01 ng/mL for each of two reagent lots. The claimed LoB for the modified Access Thyroglobulin on the DxI 9000 Access Immunoassay Analyzer is 0.03 ng/mL.
# b) LoD:
The LoD was determined by testing six native serum specimens comprised of an individual native serum sample and five pools of native serum samples using two modified Access Thyroglobulin reagent lots on two DxI Access 9000 Immunoassay Analyzers. Samples were run a minimum of eight replicates per run, one run per day, for five days for each reagent lot on each DxI 9000 Access Immunoassay Analyzer. The LoD was calculated for each reagent lot based on LoB + “SD multiplied by the 95th percentile of the standard normal distribution” per CLSI EP17-A2. The claimed LoD for the modified Access Thyroglobulin assay on the DxI 9000 Access Immunoassay Analyzer is 0.05 ng/mL.
# c) LoQ:
The LoQ was determined by testing 10 native serum specimens comprised of two individual native serum samples and eight pools of native serum samples using two modified Access Thyroglobulin reagent lots on two DxI 9000 Access Immunoassay Analyzers. Samples were run a minimum of nine replicates per run, one run per day, for five days for each reagent lot on each DxI 9000 Access Immunoassay Analyzer. The estimated LoQ of the modified Access Thyroglobulin was set to be the Thyroglobulin concentration which met the within-laboratory imprecision of 20%CV. The claimed LoQ for the modified Access Thyroglobulin assay on the DxI 9000 Access Immunoassay Analyzer is 0.1 ng/mL.
# 7. Assay Cut-Off:
Not applicable
# B Comparison Studies:
K240927 - Page 8 of 9
{8}
# 1. Method Comparison with Predicate Device:
CLSI guideline EP09c, 3rd Edition was followed to compare the modified Access Thyroglobulin assay on the DxI 9000 Access Immunoassay Analyzer to the predicate device, the Access Thyroglobulin assay on the Access 2 Immunoassay Analyzer. Samples falling within the analytical measuring interval of both assays were evaluated. A total of 187 serum samples (185 were native individual serum samples, two samples were native serum samples supplemented with purified human Thyroglobulin antigen) were tested with four modified Access Thyroglobulin reagent pack lots on four DxI 9000 Access Immunoassay Analyzers (candidate), and four Access Thyroglobulin reagent pack lots on four Access 2 Immunoassay Analyzers (predicate). The comparison between paired measurements was analyzed using Passing-Bablok method by fitting the observed modified Access Thyroglobulin on the DxI 9000 Access Immunoassay Analyzer (y) into a linear regression model, with the observed value from the predicate (x). The results are summarized in the following table:
| N | Range of Observations (ng/mL) | Slope [95% CI] | Intercept [95% CI] | Correlation Coefficient (r) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 187 | 0.350 – 472.628 | 0.996 (0.991 to 1.001) | 0.004 (-0.029 to 0.021) | 0.999 |
# 2. Matrix Comparison:
Refer to K241423
# **C Clinical Studies:**
Refer to K002905
# **D Clinical Cut-Off:**
Refer to K002905
# **E Expected Values/Reference Range:**
Refer to K220972
# **VIII Proposed Labeling:**
The labeling supports the finding of substantial equivalence for this device.
# **IX Conclusion:**
The submitted information in this premarket notification is complete and supports a substantial equivalence decision.
K240927 - Page 9 of 9
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.