Patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and non-HCC cases; Sample Size: 50 patients
Not applicable for this study
Dice similarity index, Sensitivity
AI Performance
Output
Algorithm
Acceptance
Observed
Dev DS
Dev Readers
Test DS
Test Readers
Liver lesion segmentation
—
—
Dice 0.65, Sensitivity 0.82
Internal study: 50 patients; Moltz et al study: 5 datasets comprising 10 liver metastases
—
—
—
Liver ablation zone segmentation
—
—
Dice 0.65, Sensitivity 0.95
Internal study: 33 patients with 41 ablation zones
—
—
—
Indications for Use
MyAblation Guide is a software application for image processing, 2D/3D visualization, and comparison of medical images imported from multiple imaging modalities. The software is controlled by the end user via a user interface on a workstation with DICOM connectivity or as an integrated version on a Siemens CT scanner workstation. The application is used to assist in the preparation and performance of ablative procedures, including contouring of ablation targets, virtual ablation probe placement and contouring of ablated areas, as well as supporting the User in their assessment of the treatment. The application can only be used by trained Users. The software is not intended for diagnosis and is not intended to predict ablation volumes or predict ablation success.
Device Story
Software application for percutaneous ablative procedures; used by interventional radiologists/technologists in hospital settings (OR/IR control room). Inputs: CT, MR, CBCT, PET/CT datasets. Functions: multimodality viewing, MPR, MIP, VRT, freehand/semi-automatic contouring, rigid/deformable registration, safety margin visualization, virtual ablation needle path planning, and virtual ablation zone derivation. Outputs: visualized anatomical structures, needle paths, and ablation zones; exported via DICOM SSO. Operates on Windows 10 workstations or integrated into Siemens CT scanners. Clinicians review outputs to assist in procedure planning and assessment; device does not trigger thermal ablation. Benefits: supports procedural workflow and visualization of ablation targets/zones.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical studies performed. Bench testing included functional, usability, and software-related design testing. Semi-automatic liver ablation zone segmentation algorithm evaluated via retrospective internal study (50 patients) and literature (Moltz et al., 2008, 10 liver metastases). Internal study results: DICE 0.65, sensitivity 0.82 for lesion segmentation; DICE 0.65, sensitivity 0.95 for ablation zones.
Technological Characteristics
Software-based medical image management and processing system. Operates on Windows 10 platform. Supports DICOM connectivity. Features include semi-automatic segmentation, multiplanar reconstruction (MPR), maximum intensity projection (MIP), and volume rendering (VRT). Implements rigid and deformable registration algorithms. Cybersecurity controls include access/modification prevention. Complies with IEC 62304 software life cycle processes.
Indications for Use
Indicated for use by physicians to assist in the preparation and performance of percutaneous ablative procedures, including patients with soft tissue lesions. Used for image processing, 2D/3D visualization, and comparison of medical images (CT, MR, CBCT, PET/CT). Not for diagnosis, predicting ablation volumes, or predicting ablation success.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A medical image management and processing system is a device that provides one or more capabilities relating to the review and digital processing of medical images for the purposes of interpretation by a trained practitioner of disease detection, diagnosis, or patient management. The software components may provide advanced or complex image processing functions for image manipulation, enhancement, or quantification that are intended for use in the interpretation and analysis of medical images. Advanced image manipulation functions may include image segmentation, multimodality image registration, or 3D visualization. Complex quantitative functions may include semi-automated measurements or time-series measurements.
Special Controls
*Classification.* Class II (special controls; voluntary standards—Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) Std., Joint Photographic Experts Group (JPEG) Std., Society of Motion Picture and Television Engineers (SMPTE) Test Pattern).
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image contains the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). On the left is the Department of Health & Human Services logo. To the right of that is the FDA logo, which is a blue square with the letters "FDA" in white. To the right of the blue square is the text "U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION" in blue.
Siemens Healthcare GmbH % Lynn Allman Senior Director, Regulatory Affairs Varian Medical Systems, Inc. 3100 Hansen Way Palo Alto, California 94304
August 6, 2024
Re: K240796
Trade/Device Name: myAblation Guide (VB80A) Regulation Number: 21 CFR 892.2050 Regulation Name: Medical image management and processing system Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: QTZ Dated: July 15, 2024 Received: July 16, 2024
Dear Lynn Allman:
We have reviewed your section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database available at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Additional information about changes that may require a new premarket notification are provided in the FDA guidance documents entitled "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99812/download) and "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Software Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99785/download).
{1}------------------------------------------------
Your device is also subject to, among other requirements, the Quality System (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820), which includes, but is not limited to, 21 CFR 820.30, Design controls; 21 CFR 820.90, Nonconforming product; and 21 CFR 820.100, Corrective and preventive action. Please note that regardless of whether a change requires premarket review. the OS regulation requires device manufacturers to review and approve changes to device design and production (21 CFR 820.30 and 21 CFR 820.70) and document changes and approvals in the device master record (21 CFR 820.181).
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR Part 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reportingcombination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR Parts 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reportingmdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about mediation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advice-comprehensive-regulatoryassistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
Jessica Lamb
Jessica Lamb, PhD. Assistant Director Imaging Software Team DHT8B: Division of Radiological Imaging Devices and Electronic Products OHT8: Office of Radiological Health Office of Product Evaluation and Quality Center for Devices and Radiological Health
{2}------------------------------------------------
## Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K240796
Device Name myAblation Guide (VB80A)
## Indications for Use (Describe)
MyAblation Guide is a software application for image processing, 2D/3D visualization, and comparison of medical images imported from multiple imaging modalities.
The software is controlled by the end user interface on a workstation with DICOM connectivity or as an integrated version on a Siemens CT scanner workstation.
The application is used to assist in the preparation and performance of ablative procedures, including of ablation targets, virtual ablation probe placement and contouring of ablated areas, as well as supporting the User in their assessment of the treatment. The application can only be used by trained Users.
The software is not intended for diagnosis and is not intended to predict ablation volumes or predict ablation success.
| Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable) | |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------|
| <span style="text-decoration: overline;">X</span> Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) | Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C) |
## CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
## *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/3/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo for Siemens Healthineers. The word "SIEMENS" is written in teal, and the word "Healthineers" is written in orange below it. To the right of the word "Healthineers" is a series of orange dots arranged in a pattern.
## 510(k) Summary
## myAblation Guide (Version VB80A)
The following information is provided as required by 21 CFR 807.92
#### I. Submitter and Manufacturer Information:
| Name and Address: | Varian Medical Systems Inc.<br>3100 Hansen Way, Palo Alto CA 94304 |
|--------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Contact Name: | Lynn Allman, Senior Director Regulatory Affairs |
| E-mail: | submissions.support@varian.com |
| Date Prepared: | August 6th, 2024 |
| Manufacturer Name: | Siemens Healthcare GmbH |
| Manufacturer Name: | Siemens Healthcare GmbH |
|---------------------------|-------------------------|
| Mfg. Address: | Henkestr. 127 |
| 91052 Erlangen<br>Germany | |
#### Device Information: II.
| Proprietary Name: | myAblation Guide (VB80A) |
|-----------------------|----------------------------------------------------------|
| Common/ Usual Name: | System, Image Processing, Radiological |
| Classification Name: | Medical image management and processing system |
| Classification Panel: | Radiology |
| Regulation Number: | §892.2050 Medical image management and processing system |
| Product Code | QTZ |
#### III. Predicate Device:
Aline Ablation Intelligence 1.0.0 (K202297)
This predicate has not been subject to a design-related recall.
#### IV. Subject Device Description:
myAblation Guide is a software medical device that is used in the context of percutaneous ablative procedures with straight instruments. It is used by clinical professionals in a hospital premise; it can be either deployed on compatible CT scanners or a computer workstation.
The application is operated by medical professionals such as Interventional Radiologists and medical technologists with current license and/or certification as required by regional authority. myAblation Guide allows operating functions in an arbitrary sequence. In addition, it includes a structured sequence of steps for ease of utility.
The application supports anatomical datasets from CT, MR, CBCT, as well as PET/CT.
{4}------------------------------------------------
The application includes means and functionalities to support in:
· Multimodality viewing and contouring of anatomical, and multi-parametric images such as CT, CBCT, PET/CT, MRI
· Multiplanar reconstruction (MPR) thin/thick, minimum intensity projection (MIP), volume rendering technique (VRT)
· Freehand and semi-automatic contouring of regions-of-interest on any orientation including oblique
- Manual and semi-automatic registration using rigid and deformable registration
- · Expansion of created contour structures to visualize a safety margin
· Functionality to support the user in creating virtual ablation needle paths and associated virtual ablation zones derived from manufacturer data
- · Export of virtual needle paths in the Dicom SSO format
- · Supports the user in comparing, contouring, and ablation needle planning based on datasets acquired with different imaging modalities
- Supports multimodality image fusion
- · Supports user's procedure flow via a task stepper
Thermal ablation cannot be triggered from myAblation Guide.
#### V. Indications for Use Statement:
MyAblation Guide is a software application for image processing, 2D/3D visualization, and comparison of medical images imported from multiple imaging modalities.
The software is controlled by the end user via a user interface on a workstation with DICOM connectivity or as an integrated version on a Siemens CT scanner workstation.
The application is used to assist in the preparation and performance of ablative procedures, including contouring of ablation targets, virtual ablation probe placement and contouring of ablated areas, as well as supporting the User in their assessment of the treatment. The application can only be used by trained Users.
The software is not intended for diagnosis and is not intended to predict ablation volumes or predict ablation success.
#### VI. Substantial Equivalence Discussion:
The following table compares the subject device to the predicate device with respect to indications for use, principles of operation, technological characteristics, and performance, and forms the basis for the determination of substantial equivalence.
{5}------------------------------------------------
# Healthinee
| Feature And/or Specification Of<br>New/Modified Device | Predicate Device<br>510(K) ID # K202297<br>Aline Ablation Intelligence (From<br>Mirada Medical) | MyAblation Guide<br>(Subject Device) | Analysis/Differences |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Indications for Use | Aline Ablation Intelligence is a Computed<br>Tomography (CT) and Magnetic Resonance<br>(MR) image processing software package<br>available for use with ablation procedures.<br>Aline Ablation Intelligence is controlled by<br>the user via a user interface on a<br>workstation.<br>Aline Ablation Intelligence imports images<br>from CT and MR scanners and facility<br>PACS systems for display and processing<br>during ablation procedures.<br>Aline Ablation Intelligence is used to assist<br>physicians in planning ablation procedures,<br>including identifying ablation targets and<br>virtual ablation needle placement.<br>Aline Ablation Intelligence is used to assist<br>physicians in confirming ablation zones.<br>The software is not intended for diagnosis.<br>The software is not intended to predict<br>ablation volumes or predict ablation<br>success. | MyAblation Guide is a software application<br>for image processing, 2D/3D visualization,<br>and comparison of medical images<br>imported from multiple imaging modalities.<br>The software is controlled by the end user<br>via a user interface on a workstation with<br>DICOM connectivity or as an integrated<br>version on a Siemens CT scanner<br>workstation.<br>The application is used to assist in the<br>preparation and performance of ablative<br>procedures, including contouring of<br>ablation targets, virtual ablation probe<br>placement and contouring of ablated areas,<br>as well as supporting the User in their<br>assessment of the treatment. The<br>application can only be used by trained<br>Users.<br>The software is not intended for diagnosis<br>and is not intended to predict ablation<br>volumes or predict ablation success. | Substantially equivalent<br>The myAblation Guide intended use is<br>similar to the intended use of the<br>predicate device. Both devices are used to<br>process a variety of medical images in<br>support of ablation procedures. |
| Intended Users | Physicians | Physicians | Same as predicate |
| Intended patient population | The patient demographic chosen by<br>interventional radiologists to undergo<br>ablation treatment (including patient with<br>soft tissue lesions). | The patient demographic chosen by<br>physicians to undergo percutaneous<br>ablation treatment (including patient with<br>soft tissue lesions). | Same as predicate |
| US product code | 21 CFR 892.2050 | 21 CFR 892.2050 | Same as predicate |
| Operating Environment | Operating Room and the hospital healthcare<br>environment such as interventional<br>radiology control room. | Operating Room and the hospital healthcare<br>environment | Same as predicate |
| Feature And/or Specification Of<br>New/Modified Device | Predicate Device<br>510(K) ID # K202297<br>Aline Ablation Intelligence (From<br>Mirada Medical) | MyAblation Guide<br>(Subject Device) | Analysis/Differences |
| Operating System / Platform | Microsoft Windows compatible machine.<br>64-bit Windows 7 and 10. | Windows 10 | Substantially equivalent |
| Supported modalities | CT, MRI. | CT, MRI, PET, PET-CT, CBCT images | Substantially equivalent<br>Software validation and verification tests<br>to ensure the performance and<br>compatibility of modalities not seen in the<br>predicate do not raise different concerns of<br>safety or effectiveness. |
| (Semi-)Automatic Structure Segmentation | Yes | Yes, for livers | Substantially equivalent |
| Structure Margin Indication | Yes | Yes | Substantially equivalent |
| Simulation of virtual needle path (Virtual<br>Ablation Probe Planning) | Yes | Yes | Substantially equivalent |
| 3D Visualization of segmented structures,<br>including Ablation Zone | Yes | Yes | Substantially equivalent |
| Data export to myNeedle Guide on Siemens<br>Healthineers syngo CT systems | No | Yes | Data export tests to these compatible<br>devices do not raise significantly different<br>concerns of safety or effectiveness. |
| Image registration: Overlay of Virtual Ablation<br>Probe and Achieved Ablation Probe Position | Yes | Yes | Substantially equivalent |
| Image registration: Overlay of planned and<br>achieved ablation zone in 2D/3D for visual<br>Evaluation of Ablation Result | Yes | Yes | Substantially equivalent |
## Table 1: Comparison of Technological Characteristics between subject and predicate devices
{6}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/6/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo for Siemens Healthineers. The word "SIEMENS" is written in teal, and the word "Healthineers" is written in orange below it. To the right of the words is a graphic of orange dots.
{7}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/7/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo for Siemens Healthineers. The word "SIEMENS" is written in teal, and the word "Healthineers" is written in orange below it. To the right of the text is a graphic of orange dots arranged in a circular pattern.
### Performance Data: VII.
## 1. Non-clinical Testing:
myAblation Guide underwent non-clinical testing to demonstrate the design and performance of the devices meet the established design criteria and are substantial equivalent to the predicate devices. The subject device successfully completed functional, usability, and other softwarerelated design testing.
## Semi-automatic segmentation algorithms:
The clinical performance testing of the semi-automatic liver ablation zone segmentation has been evaluated by Moltz et al (Moltz J. & .- O., 2008) as well as in a retrospective internal study. Altogether, CT-datasets from 60 patients have been assessed. The evaluated cases comprise hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and non-HCC cases.
To assess the algorithm's performance on liver metastases, Moltz et al conducted a study evaluating five different data sets comprising of ten liver metastases originating from diverse primary turnors. With a Dice coefficient (Dice similarity index) of 0.82 the algorithm effectively demonstrated the segmentation of both hyperdense and hypodense lesions, regardless of their placement within the liver or in its surrounding areas.
(The tabulated results were converted for the purpose of comparing them with our internal study.) The internal analysis of the lesion segmentation included a total of 50 patients. The DICE for all lesion types is 0.65 with a sensitivity of 0.82, as outlined in the following table:
| Metric | All Lesion Types | HCC | non-HCC |
|-----------------------------|------------------|------|---------|
| Dice / True Positive Lesion | 0.65 | 0.62 | 0.66 |
| Sensitivity | 0.82 | 0.81 | 0.81 |
Sensitivity is referred to as: "Sensitivity = TP / (TP + FN)" with true positive (TP) defined as Intersection over Union (IoU) ≥ 0.1 and false negative (FN) as IoU < 0.1. Correspondingly, a sensitivity of 0.82 means that statistically, 82 out of 100 lesions have been segmented and fulfil the requirement with IoU ≤ 0.1. The ablation zone algorithm analysis involved a total of 33 patients with 41 available ablation zones. The DICE for liver ablation zones is 0.65 with an overall sensitivity of 0.95.
## 2. Clinical Testing (N/A):
No clinical studies were carried out for the subject device, and therefore, no such clinical data is provided within this submission.
## 3. Software, Cybersecurity, and Interoperability
Software verification was conducted in accordance with IEC 62304 - "Medical device software - Software life cycle processes" and FDA guidance "Content of Premarket Submissions for Device Software Functions.
Cybersecurity and Interoperability requirements were assessed per FDA guidance's Cybersecurity in Medical Devices: Quality System Considerations and Content of Premarket Submissions, Postmarket Management of Cybersecurity in Medical Devices, Design
{8}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/8/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo for Siemens Healthineers. The word "SIEMENS" is written in teal, and the word "Healthineers" is written in orange below it. To the right of the text is a series of orange dots arranged in a circular pattern.
Considerations and Premarket Submission Recommendations for Interoperable Medical Devices".
Cybersecurity considerations related to the subject device are included within this submission. Siemens Healthineers conforms to cybersecurity requirements by implementing a means to prevent unauthorized access, modification, misuse, denial of use or unauthorized use of information stored, accessed or transferred from a medical device to an external recipient.
#### VIII. Conclusion:
Performance tests were conducted to test the functionality of the device. These tests have been performed to assess the functionality of the subject device. Results of all testing conducted were found acceptable in support to determine similarities to the previously cleared device.
Device labeling contains instructions for use and any necessary cautions and warnings to provide for safe and effective use of this device. Risk management was implemented throughout the development process to control potential hazards.
The device does not come in contact with the patient and is only used by trained professionals. The output of the device is evaluated by clinicians, providing for sufficient review to identify and intervene in the event of a malfunction. The manufacturer believes that the subject device is safe and effective as the identified predicate device and does not introduce new safety and effectiveness concerns.
## Assessment on Substantial Equivalence:
The comparison of intended use, technological characteristics, performance specifications, device hazards as well as verification and validation results demonstrate that myAblation Guide is substantially equivalent to the predicate device. In summary, the manufacturer is of the opinion that myAblation Guide does not introduce any new potential safety risks and is similar to the predicate device.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.