K240479 · Beckman Coulter, Inc. · LTK · May 10, 2024 · Immunology
Device Facts
Record ID
K240479
Device Name
Access OV Monitor
Applicant
Beckman Coulter, Inc.
Product Code
LTK · Immunology
Decision Date
May 10, 2024
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 866.6010
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Real-World Evidence
Real-World Evidence
Submission
Device
Sponsor
RWD Sources
RWE Use Summary
Key Tags
K240479 · May 10, 2024
Access OV Monitor
Beckman Coulter, Inc.
Patient serum samples
Method comparison study using 152 patient serum samples to demonstrate substantial equivalence between the modified Access OV Monitor on the DxI 9000 analyzer and the predicate device.
Access OV Monitor on the Access 2 Immunoassay System (Predicate)
Passing-Bablok regression analysis of paired measurements
Indications for Use
The Access OV Monitor assay is a paramagnetic particle, chemiluminescent immunoassay for the quantitative determination of CA 125 antigen levels in human serum and plasma using the Access Immunoassay Systems. This device is indicated for use in the measurement of CA 125 antigen to aid in the management of ovarian cancer patients. Serial testing for patient CA 125 antigen concentrations should be used in conjunction with other clinical methods used for monitoring ovarian cancer.
Device Story
Access OV Monitor is a sandwich immunoenzymatic assay for quantitative determination of CA 125 antigen in human serum/plasma. The device utilizes paramagnetic particles and chemiluminescence technology. It is designed for use on the Dxl 9000 Access Immunoassay Analyzer in clinical laboratory settings. The assay requires a reagent pack, calibrators, substrate (Lumi-Phos PRO), and wash buffer. The system automates the immunoassay process; the analyzer measures chemiluminescent signals to determine antigen concentration. Healthcare providers use serial test results in conjunction with other clinical methods to monitor ovarian cancer management, potentially aiding in tracking disease progression or treatment response.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. Method comparison study (n=152) comparing Dxl 9000 to predicate showed R2=1.00, slope 0.98 (95% CI 0.97-0.99). Imprecision study (CLSI EP05-A3) demonstrated within-laboratory (total) %CV ranging from 2.6% to 6.1% for concentrations >15 U/mL and SD of 0.2 for concentrations ≤15 U/mL. Linearity verified across 2.0-5,000 U/mL. LoB=0.5 U/mL, LoD=0.7 U/mL, LoQ=2.0 U/mL.
Technological Characteristics
Paramagnetic particle, chemiluminescent sandwich immunoassay. Automated operation on Dxl 9000 Access Immunoassay Analyzer. Uses Lumi-Phos PRO substrate. Measuring range 2.0-5,000 U/mL. Sample volume 30 uL. Stability 28 days after opening. Standardized via working calibrators.
Indications for Use
Indicated for the quantitative measurement of CA 125 antigen in human serum and plasma to aid in the management of ovarian cancer patients. Serial testing is intended for use in conjunction with other clinical methods for monitoring ovarian cancer.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A tumor-associated antigen immunological test system is a device that consists of reagents used to qualitatively or quantitatively measure, by immunochemical techniques, tumor-associated antigens in serum, plasma, urine, or other body fluids. This device is intended as an aid in monitoring patients for disease progress or response to therapy or for the detection of recurrent or residual disease.
Special Controls
*Classification.* Class II (special controls). Tumor markers must comply with the following special controls: (1) A guidance document entitled “Guidance Document for the Submission of Tumor Associated Antigen Premarket Notifications (510(k)s) to FDA,” and (2) voluntary assay performance standards issued by the National Committee on Clinical Laboratory Standards.
Predicate Devices
Access OV Monitor Immunoenzymetric Assay (K023597)
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}
FDA
U.S. FOOD & DRUG
ADMINISTRATION
# 510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION DECISION SUMMARY
ASSAY ONLY
## I Background Information:
A 510(k) Number
K240479
B Applicant
Beckman Coulter, Inc.
C Proprietary and Established Names
Access OV Monitor
D Regulatory Information
| Product Code(s) | Classification | Regulation Section | Panel |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| LTK | Class II | 21 CFR 866.6010 - Tumor-Associated Antigen Immunological Test System | IM - Immunology |
## II Submission/Device Overview:
A Purpose for Submission:
Modification of the previously cleared device – change of substrate, sample volume and updated analytical measuring interval of the assay on the DxI 9000 Immunoassay Analyzer
B Measurand:
Cancer Antigen (CA) 125
C Type of Test:
Quantitative, Chemiluminescent immunoassay
## III Intended Use/Indications for Use:
A Intended Use(s):
Food and Drug Administration
10903 New Hampshire Avenue
Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
www.fda.gov
{1}
See Indications for Use below.
## B Indication(s) for Use:
The Access OV Monitor assay is a paramagnetic particle, chemiluminescent immunoassay for the quantitative determination of CA 125 antigen levels in human serum and plasma using the Access Immunoassay Systems. This device is indicated for use in the measurement of CA 125 antigen to aid in the management of ovarian cancer patients. Serial testing for patient CA 125 antigen concentrations should be used in conjunction with other clinical methods used for monitoring ovarian cancer.
## C Special Conditions for Use Statement(s):
Rx - For Prescription Use Only
The Instruction for Use of the device contains the following warnings:
The concentration of CA 125 antigen in a given specimen determined with assays from different manufacturers can vary due to differences in assay methods and reagent specificity. The results reported by the laboratory to the physician must include the identity of the CA 125 antigen assay used. Values obtained with different assay methods cannot be used interchangeably. If, in the course of monitoring a patient, the assay method used for determining CA 125 antigen values is changed, additional sequential testing should be carried out to confirm baseline values.
## D Special Instrument Requirements:
DxI 9000 Access Immunoassay Analyzer (K221225)
## IV Device/System Characteristics:
### A Device Description:
Each Access OV Monitor Reagent Pack contains two reagent packs (50 tests/pack). Each pack contains the following:
- Paramagnetic particles, coated with goat anti-biotin antibodies, biotinylated anti CA 125 antigen mouse monoclonal antibodies, bovine serum albumin, < 0.1% sodium azide, and 0.1% ProClin 300.
- Mouse monoclonal anti-CA 125 antigen-alkaline phosphatase (bovine) conjugate, bovine serum albumin, < 0.1% sodium azide, and 0.1% ProClin 300.
- Buffered protein solution (bovine, goat, mouse), < 0.1% sodium azide and 0.1% ProClin 300.
Materials needed but not supplied with reagent kit:
- Access OV Monitor Calibrators: at approximately 0, 25, 100, 500, 2,000 and 5,000 U/mL
- Quality Control (QC) materials: commercial control material
- Substrate: Lumi-Phos PRO
K240479 - Page 2 of 9
{2}
- UniCel DxI Wash Buffer II
- Access Sample Diluent A (optional)
The modification of the Access OV Monitor includes:
(a) a new substrate replacement (Lumi-Phos PRO)
(b) run on DxI 9000 Access Immunoassay Analyzer with updated analytical measuring interval of 2.0 – 5,000 U/mL
## B Principle of Operation:
The Access OV Monitor assay is a two-site immunoenzymatic (“sandwich”) assay. A sample is added to a reaction vessel along with mouse monoclonal anti-CA 125 antigen alkaline phosphatase conjugate and paramagnetic particles coated with a second mouse monoclonal anti-CA 125 antigen antibody. The CA 125 antigen in the sample binds to the immobilized monoclonal anti-CA 125 antigen on the solid phase, while the conjugate antibody reacts with a different antigenic site on the CA 125 antigen molecule. After incubation, materials bound to the solid phase are held in a magnetic field while unbound materials are washed away. Then, the chemiluminescent substrate is added to the vessel and light generated by the reaction is measured with a luminometer. The light production is directly proportional to the concentration of analyte in the sample. Analyte concentration is automatically determined from a stored calibration.
## V Substantial Equivalence Information:
### A Predicate Device Name(s):
Access OV Monitor Immunoenzymetric Assay
### B Predicate 510(k) Number(s):
K023597
### C Comparison with Predicate(s):
| Device & Predicate Device(s): | K240479
Candidate Device | K023597
Predicate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Device Trade Name | Access OV Monitor | Same |
| General Device Characteristic Similarities | | |
| Intended Use/Indications For Use | The Access OV Monitor assay is a paramagnetic particle, chemiluminescent immunoassay for the quantitative determination of CA 125 antigen levels in human serum and plasma using the Access Immunoassay Systems. This device is indicated for use in the measurement of CA 125 antigen to aid in the management of ovarian cancer patients. Serial testing | Same |
K240479 - Page 3 of 9
{3}
| | for patient CA 125 antigen concentrations should be used in conjunction with other clinical methods used for monitoring ovarian cancer. | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Measurand | CA 125 antigen | Same |
| Sample Type | Serum and Plasma (heparin) | Same |
| Assay Technology | Chemiluminescent | Same |
| Format | Sandwich Immunoassay | Same |
| Measurement | Quantitative | Same |
| Antibody | Monoclonal (mouse) anti-CA 125 antibodies | Same |
| Calibrators | Utilizes a stored calibration curve | Same |
| Reagent Stability | 28 days after opening | Same |
| Method | Automated | Same |
| General Device Characteristic Differences | | |
| Instrument | DxI 9000 Access Immunoassay Analyzer | Access Immunoassay system |
| Substrate | Lumi-Phos PRO substrate | Access Substrate |
| Measuring Range | 2.0 – 5,000 U/mL | 0.5 – 5000 U/mL |
| Sample Volume | 30 μL | 25 μL |
VI Standards/Guidance Documents Referenced:
The following Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines were used:
- CLSI EP05-A3, Evaluation of Precision of Quantitative Measurement Procedures; Approved Guideline—Third Edition
- CLSI EP06 2nd Edition, Evaluation of Linearity of Quantitative, Measurement Procedures
- CLSI EP09c 3rd Edition, Measurement Procedure Comparison and Bias Estimation Using Patient Samples
- CLSI EP17-A2, Evaluation of Detection Capability for Clinical Laboratory Measurement Procedures; Approved Guideline—Second Edition
- CLSI EP34 1st Edition, Establishing and Verifying an Extended Measuring Interval Through Specimen Dilution and Spiking
VII Performance Characteristics (if/when applicable):
A Analytical Performance:
1. Precision/Reproducibility:
K240479 - Page 4 of 9
{4}
Precision testing was performed in accordance with CLSI guideline EP05-A3.
a) Within-Laboratory Precision
The studies were performed at a single site using one lot of the modified Access OV Monitor reagent on one DxI 9000 Access Immunoassay Analyzer. Five levels of human serum samples were run in a minimum of three replicates per run, two runs daily over the course of 20 days, resulting a minimum of 120 datapoints for each sample. The data were analyzed for repeatability (within-run), between-run, between-day, and within-laboratory precision. The mean (U/mL), standard deviation (SD) (U/mL) and percent coefficient of variation (%CV) are summarized in table below.
| Sample | N | Mean (U/mL) | Within-Run (Repeatability) | | Between-Run | | Between-Day | | Within-Laboratory | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV |
| 1 | 120 | 5.5 | 0.1 | 1.7 | 0.1 | 1.6 | 0.2 | 3.4 | 0.2 | 4.1 |
| 2 | 120 | 54 | 1.6 | 2.9 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.2 | 2.2 | 2.0 | 3.6 |
| 3 | 120 | 89 | 1.5 | 1.6 | 1.7 | 1.8 | 1.2 | 1.3 | 2.5 | 2.8 |
| 4 | 120 | 524 | 9.4 | 1.8 | 5.8 | 1.1 | 8.7 | 1.7 | 14.0 | 2.7 |
| 5 | 120 | 1578 | 30.0 | 1.9 | 17.8 | 1.1 | 20.8 | 1.3 | 40.6 | 2.6 |
| 6 | 120 | 2,837 | 94.9 | 3.3 | 23.3 | 0.8 | 131.2 | 4.6 | 163.7 | 5.8 |
| 7 | 120 | 3,632 | 101.6 | 2.8 | 52.9 | 1.5 | 162.4 | 4.5 | 198.7 | 5.5 |
| 8 | 120 | 4,489 | 128.1 | 2.9 | 28.4 | 0.6 | 239.4 | 5.3 | 273.0 | 6.1 |
b) Lot-to-Lot Precision
The lot-to-lot precision of Lumi-Phos PRO Substrate was assessed in K223921.
The lot-to-lot precision of the modified Access OV Monitor reagent was performed at a single site using three reagent lots with one Access OV Monitor Calibrator lot, and on three DxI 9000 Analyzers. Five levels of serum samples were run in five replicates per run, one run per day over the course of five days, resulting a total of 75 datapoints for each sample on each instrument. The data were analyzed for repeatability (within-run), between-day, between-reagent lot, and total precision. The mean (U/mL), standard deviation (SD) (U/mL) and percent coefficient of variation (%CV) on one representative instrument are summarized in table below:
| Sample | N | Mean (U/mL) | Within-Run (Repeatability) | | Between-Day | | Between-Reagent Lot | | Total | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV |
| 1 | 75 | 5.4 | 0.1 | 2.3 | 0.1 | 1.1 | 0.1 | 1.3 | 0.2 | 2.9 |
| 2 | 75 | 38 | 0.8 | 2.2 | 0.8 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.1 | 3.0 |
| 3 | 75 | 88 | 1.5 | 1.7 | 2.0 | 2.3 | 0.9 | 1.1 | 2.7 | 3.1 |
| 4 | 75 | 2845 | 49.8 | 1.8 | 49.6 | 1.7 | 15.6 | 0.5 | 72 | 2.5 |
| 5 | 75 | 3761 | 72.3 | 1.9 | 87.4 | 2.3 | 15.8 | 0.4 | 114.5 | 3.0 |
c) Instrument-to-Instrument Reproducibility
K240479 - Page 5 of 9
{5}
The study was performed using three DxI 9000 Access Immunoassay Analyzers. Five levels of serum samples were used across three modified Access OV Monitor reagent lots and one calibrator lot on each instrument run in five replicates per run, one run per day over the course of five days, resulting a total of 75 datapoints for each sample on each instrument. The data were analyzed for within-run, between-day, between-instrument, and reproducibility. The mean (U/mL), standard deviation (SD) (U/mL) and percent coefficient of variation (%CV) using one representative reagent lot are summarized in table below:
| Sample | N | Mean (U/mL) | Repeatability (Within-run) | | Between-Day | | Between-Instrument | | Reproducibility | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV |
| 1 | 75 | 5.4 | 0.1 | 2.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 1.2 | 0.1 | 2.6 |
| 2 | 75 | 39 | 0.9 | 2.3 | 0.3 | 0.7 | 0.4 | 1.1 | 1.0 | 2.7 |
| 3 | 75 | 88 | 1.3 | 1.5 | 1.7 | 1.9 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 2.2 | 2.4 |
| 4 | 75 | 2,845 | 57.0 | 2.0 | 40.4 | 1.4 | 22.1 | 0.8 | 73.3 | 2.6 |
| 5 | 75 | 3,754 | 92.6 | 2.5 | 72.0 | 1.9 | 48.4 | 1.3 | 126.9 | 3.4 |
## 2. Linearity:
### a) Linearity studies:
Linearity of the modified Access OV Monitor was performed in accordance with CLSI guideline EP06 2nd Edition. Two series of High samples were prepared by pooling human serum samples to achieve CA 125 concentrations of 360 U/mL (Sample-1) and 6,162 U/mL (Sample-2). Low sample was obtained from a single human serum sample that was specifically stripped of CA 125 antigen using paramagnetic particles to achieve a concentration below the low end of the AMI of the assay. The low sample in the two series was run in replicates of eight, and all other dilution levels were run in replicates of four, and the 'measured value' (mean CA 125 U/mL) was compared to its predicted value for deviation percentage using a weighted linear regression analysis. This deviation was then compared to the allowable deviation from linearity (ADL). The results are summarized in table below.
| Sample | Range (U/mL) | Slope (95% CI) | Intercept (95% CI) | R² | % Deviation** |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | 0.5 – 362 | 0.977 (0.968, 0.985) | -0.004 (-0.104, 0.096) | 0.999 | -3% – 3% |
| 2 | 0.5 – 6,162 | 1.02 (1.010, 1.030) | -0.01 (-0.070, 0.050) | 0.999 | -2% – 5% |
| 1 & 2* | 0.5 – 6,162 | 1.00 (0.990, 1.00) | -0.01 (-0.080, 0.060) | 1.000 | -5% – 7% |
* Combined from Sample 1 and 2
** % Deviation from Linearity for concentrations > 15 U/mL
The data support the linearity interval from 0.5 to 6,162 U/mL with the deviations from linearity within ±10%. The study results support the linearity of the claimed analytical measuring interval (AMI): 2.0 – 5,000 U/mL.
K240479 - Page 6 of 9
{6}
b) Extended Measuring Interval (Auto Dilution):
Extended measuring range study was conducted in accordance with CLSI guideline EP34, 1st Edition. A total of five individual human serum samples spiked with antigen to achieve doses within the extended measuring interval (EMI) of the assay concentrations between 8,000 U/mL and 100,000 U/mL. Two operators each prepared two independent 1:20 manual dilutions for each sample. Manual dilutions and dilutions performed by two DxI 9000 Access Immunoassay Analyzers were done with one Access OV Monitor reagent lot. Recovery results for dilution factor at 1:20 for samples with concentrations between 8,015 U/mL up to 83,361 U/mL are between 94% and 99%. These results showed that the dilution at 1:20 performed by the DxI 9000 Access Immunoassay Analyzer are consistent with manual dilutions.
3. Analytical Specificity/Interference:
a) Endogenous/Exogenous Substance Interference
Refer to K023597
b) Carryover
Carryover was established in K221225.
4. Assay Reportable Range:
The reportable range is the same as the claimed analytical measuring interval (AMI): 2.0 – 5,000 U/mL. The device allows auto-dilution of samples—the extended measuring interval (EMI) ‘upper limit of quantitation’ (ULOQ to the maximum dilution concentration) is 100,000 U/mL.
5. Traceability, Stability, Expected Values (Controls, Calibrators, or Methods):
a) Traceability:
The traceability was established in K023597.
b) Stability:
The Access OV Monitor Reagent kit and the Lumi-Phos PRO substrate are packaged separately. Access OV Monitor Reagent kit stability was established in K023597. The proposed change is to replace substrate (Lumi-Phos 530) of the modified Access OV Monitor with a new substrate (Lumi-Phos PRO). The shelf-life claims and on-board stability claims of Lumi-Phos PRO substrate were established in K221225.
K240479 - Page 7 of 9
{7}
K240479 - Page 8 of 9
6. Detection Capability:
CLSI guideline EP17-A2 was followed to determine the Limit of Blank (LoB), Limit of Detection (LoD) and Limit of Quantitation (LoQ) for the modified Access OV Monitor on DxI 9000 Access Immunoassay Analyzer.
a) LoB:
Five blank samples (individual native serum samples from which CA 125 was specifically depleted) were tested in five replicates per run, one run per day over three days using two modified Access OV Monitor reagent lots (N = 75 replicates for each lot) on two DxI 9000 Access Immunoassay Analyzers. The LoB for each reagent lot was calculated using the non-parametric approach and the maximum observed LoB is taken as the reported value for the measurement procedure. LoB determined using the 95% non-parametric percentile of the replicates for each of the two reagent lots was 0.2 U/mL. The claimed LoB for the modified Access OV Monitor on DxI 9000 Access Immunoassay Analyzer is 0.5 U/mL.
b) LoD:
Seven serum samples containing low levels of CA 125 were run in eight to nine replicates per run, one run per day over five days using three modified Access OV Monitor reagent lots (N = minimum 280 replicates for each lot) on two DxI 9000 Access Immunoassay Analyzers. The LoD was determined by fitting the precision profile model between within-laboratory SD and concentration. LoD calculated from LoB + "SD multiplied by the 95th percentile of the standard normal distribution" resulted in 0.3 U/mL for each reagent lot. The claimed LoD for the modified Access OV Monitor on DxI 9000 Access Immunoassay Analyzer is 0.7 U/mL.
c) LoQ:
A minimum of 13 serum samples containing low levels of CA 125 were run in nine replicates of per run, one run per day over five days using three modified Access OV Monitor reagent lots (N=minimum 585 replicates for each lot) on three DxI 9000 Access Immunoassay Analyzers. A variance components model was used to estimate the within-run and within-laboratory (total) %CV for each sample on each instrument and reagent lot combination. The estimated LoQ of the modified Access OV Monitor within-laboratory imprecision of 20% CV resulted in 0.3 U/mL. The claimed LoQ for the modified Access OV Monitor on DxI 9000 Access Immunoassay Analyzer is 2.0 U/mL.
7. Assay Cut-Off:
Not applicable
B Comparison Studies:
1. Method Comparison with Predicate Device:
{8}
CLSI guideline EP09c 3rd Edition was followed to compare the modified Access OV Monitor on DxI 9000 Access Immunoassay Analyzer to the predicate device, the Access OV Monitor on the Access 2 Immunoassay System. Patient samples falling within the analytical measuring interval of the Access OV Monitor assay were evaluated. A total of 152 serum samples were tested with three Access OV Monitor reagent lots and three calibrator lots, on three DxI 9000 Access Immunoassay Analyzers (candidate) and three Access 2 instruments (predicate). Three commercial quality controls were run in duplicate each day to verify the systems were in control. The comparison between paired measurements was analyzed using Passing-Bablok method by fitting the observed modified Access OV Monitor Assay on DxI 9000 Access Immunoassay Analyzer (dependent variable, y) into a linear regression model, with the observed values from the predicate (x, predicate). The results are summarized in the following table:
| N | Range (U/mL) | Slope (95% CI) | Intercept (95% CI) | R |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 152 | 2.4 – 5,001 | 0.98 (0.97; 0.99) | -0.14 (-0.38; 0.13) | 1.00 |
2. Matrix Comparison:
Refer to K023597
C Clinical Studies:
Refer to K023597
D Clinical Cut-Off:
Refer to K023597
E Expected Values/Reference Range:
Refer to K023597
VIII Proposed Labeling:
The labeling supports the finding of substantial equivalence for this device.
IX Conclusion:
The submitted information in this premarket notification is complete and supports a substantial equivalence decision.
K240479 - Page 9 of 9
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.