K233946 · Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics Products, Ltd. · MOI · Mar 13, 2024 · Immunology
Device Facts
Record ID
K233946
Device Name
IMMULITE® 2000 BR-MA
Applicant
Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics Products, Ltd.
Product Code
MOI · Immunology
Decision Date
Mar 13, 2024
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 866.6010
Device Class
Class 2
Indications for Use
For in vitro diagnostic use with the IMMULITE 2000 Systems Analyzers – for the quantitative measurement of CA15-3 antigen in human serum and plasma, as an aid in the detection of recurrence in previously treated stage II and stage III breast cancer patients, and in the management of metastatic breast cancer patients by monitoring disease progression or response to treatment. Serial testing for patient CA15-3 values should be used in conjunction with other clinical methods used for detecting early recurrence in stage II and stage III disease and for monitoring response to treatment in patients with metastatic breast cancer.
Device Story
IMMULITE 2000 BR-MA is a two-step sequential solid-phase chemiluminescent immunometric assay for CA 15-3 antigen. Input: human serum or plasma samples. Process: sample incubated with biotinylated anti-CA15-3 antibody-coated beads; unbound material removed via centrifugal wash; alkaline phosphatase-conjugated anti-CA15-3 antibody added to form sandwich immunocomplex; unbound conjugate removed via centrifugal wash; chemiluminescent substrate added. Output: photons measured by luminometer as relative light units (RLU), proportional to CA 15-3 concentration (U/mL). Used in clinical laboratories on IMMULITE 2000 Systems Analyzers. Results assist physicians in monitoring breast cancer recurrence and treatment response. Modification from predicate includes solid-phase changes to mitigate biotin interference up to 3500 ng/mL.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. Precision evaluated per CLSI EP05-A3 (n=80/sample). Linearity verified per CLSI EP06-Ed2 (0.72–404.92 U/mL). Analytical specificity/interference tested per CLSI EP07-A3; no significant interference from endogenous/exogenous substances including biotin (3500 ng/mL). Method comparison (n=315) against predicate showed high correlation (r=0.989–0.992). Reference range verification (n=69) confirmed consistency with previously established values.
Indicated for quantitative measurement of CA15-3 antigen in human serum and plasma to aid in detection of recurrence in previously treated stage II and stage III breast cancer patients and to monitor disease progression or treatment response in metastatic breast cancer patients.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A tumor-associated antigen immunological test system is a device that consists of reagents used to qualitatively or quantitatively measure, by immunochemical techniques, tumor-associated antigens in serum, plasma, urine, or other body fluids. This device is intended as an aid in monitoring patients for disease progress or response to therapy or for the detection of recurrent or residual disease.
Special Controls
*Classification.* Class II (special controls). Tumor markers must comply with the following special controls: (1) A guidance document entitled “Guidance Document for the Submission of Tumor Associated Antigen Premarket Notifications (510(k)s) to FDA,” and (2) voluntary assay performance standards issued by the National Committee on Clinical Laboratory Standards.
{0}
FDA
U.S. FOOD & DRUG
ADMINISTRATION
# 510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION DECISION SUMMARY
ASSAY ONLY
## I Background Information:
A 510(k) Number
K233946
B Applicant
Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics Products Ltd
C Proprietary and Established Names
IMMULITE 2000 BR-MA
D Regulatory Information
| Product Code(s) | Classification | Regulation Section | Panel |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| MOI | Class II | 21 CFR 866.6010 - Tumor-Associated Antigen Immunological Test System | IM - Immunology |
## II Submission/Device Overview:
A Purpose for Submission:
Modification of the previously cleared device to mitigate biotin interference.
B Measurand:
Cancer Antigen 15-3 (CA 15-3)
C Type of Test:
Quantitative, chemiluminescent immunometric assay
## III Intended Use/Indications for Use:
A Intended Use(s):
See Indications for Use below.
Food and Drug Administration
10903 New Hampshire Avenue
Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
www.fda.gov
{1}
B Indication(s) for Use:
For in vitro diagnostic use with the IMMULITE 2000 Systems Analyzers – for the quantitative measurement of CA15-3 antigen in human serum and plasma, as an aid in the detection of recurrence in previously treated stage II and stage III breast cancer patients, and in the management of metastatic breast cancer patients by monitoring disease progression or response to treatment. Serial testing for patient CA15-3 values should be used in conjunction with other clinical methods used for detecting early recurrence in stage II and stage III disease and for monitoring response to treatment in patients with metastatic breast cancer.
C Special Conditions for Use Statement(s):
Rx - For Prescription Use Only
For In Vitro Diagnostic Use Only
The package insert of the device contains the warning: “CA15-3 antigen levels in a given specimen determined with assays from different manufacturers can vary due to differences in assay methods and reagent specificity. Results reported by the laboratory to the physician must include the identity of the assay used to measure CA15-3 antigen levels. Values obtained with different assays cannot be used interchangeably. Before changing assays, the laboratory must confirm baseline values for patients being serially monitored.”
D Special Instrument Requirements:
IMMULITE 2000 Systems Analyzer (K970227)
IV Device/System Characteristics:
A Device Description:
IMMULITE 2000 BR-MA consists of the reagent pack. Each reagent pack is for 200 tests and contains:
- BR-MA Bead Pack (1 pack, 200 beads/pack): coated with anti-CA15-3 murine monoclonal antibody
- BR-MA Reagent Wedge:
- Well 1 (11.5 mL): serum-based buffer, with preservative
- Well 2 (11.5 mL): alkaline phosphatase (bovine calf intestine) conjugated to murine monoclonal anti-CA15-3 antibody in buffer, with preservative
- BR-MA Adjustors (Low and High; 2 vials, 3 mL/vial): lyophilized CA15-3 in a nonhuman serum matrix, with preservative; Reconstitute each vial with 3.0 mL distilled or deionized water.
Materials Provided Separately:
- Multi-Diluent 2
- Chemiluminescent Substrate Module
K233946 - Page 2 of 11
{2}
- Probe Wash
- Probe Cleaning Kit
- Disposable Reaction Tubes, Sample Diluent Test Tubes, Sample Diluent Tube Caps
The manufacturer recommends the use of commercially available quality control materials or sample pools with at least two levels (low and high) of CA15-3.
To mitigate the risk of biotin interference, the IMMULITE 2000 BR-MA reagent pack has been modified from the previously cleared assay, which was susceptible to interference from biotin.
## B Principle of Operation:
The IMMULITE 2000 BR-MA is a two-step sequential solid-phase chemiluminescent immunometric assay. There are two incubation cycles of 30 minutes each. During the initial 30-minute cycle, the patient sample is incubated with a biotinylated antibody coated bead and buffer (reagent wedge well 1). The biotinylated antibody on the bead captures the antigen in the patient sample. On completion of the first 30-minute cycle, unbound sample/buffer mixture is removed via a centrifugal wash. During the second 30-minute cycle, alkaline phosphatase antibody conjugate in buffer (reagent wedge well 2) is added to complete the bead pair immunocomplex sandwich consisting of capture Ab-antigen-detection Ab. On completion of the second 30-minute cycle, unbound conjugate is removed by centrifugal wash. The amount of alkaline phosphatase bound is directly proportional to the analyte in the patient sample. Following the two 30-minute incubation periods, IMMULITE chemiluminescent substrate is added for a further 5-minute incubation period to generate the luminogenic reaction. The chemiluminescent substrate undergoes hydrolysis in the presence of the alkaline phosphatase to yield an unstable intermediate, which then emits photons. The sustained emissions are measured by the luminometer. The resulting relative light units (RLU) are proportional to the concentration of CA 15-3 in the sample, which is expressed as U/mL. The CA15-3 concentration in the serum is determined from a reagent lot specific calibration curve that is correlated to the individual instrument using supplied high and low adjustors.
## V Substantial Equivalence Information:
### A Predicate Device Name(s):
IMMULITE 2000 BR-MA
### B Predicate 510(k) Number(s):
K013984
K233946 - Page 3 of 11
{3}
C Comparison with Predicate(s):
| Device & Predicate Device(s): | K233946 | K013984 (Predicate) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Device Trade Name | IMMULITE 2000 BR-MA | IMMULITE 2000 BR-MA |
| General Device Characteristic Similarities | | |
| Intended Use/Indications for Use | For in vitro diagnostic use with the IMMULITE 2000 Systems Analyzers — for the quantitative measurement of CA15-3 antigen in human serum and plasma, as an aid in the detection of recurrence in previously treated stage II and stage III breast cancer patients, and in the management of metastatic breast cancer patients by monitoring disease progression or response to treatment. Serial testing for patient CA15-3 values should be used in conjunction with other clinical methods used for detecting early recurrence in stage II and stage III disease and for monitoring response to treatment in patients with metastatic breast cancer. | Same |
| Analyte | Cancer Antigen (CA) 15-3 | Same |
| Measurement | Quantitative | Same |
| Sample Type | Human serum; heparinized and EDTA plasma | Same |
| Measuring Range | 1–300 U/mL | Same |
| Assay technology | Chemiluminescent immunoassay | Same |
| Instrument | IMMULITE 2000 System Analyzers | Same |
| Sample Volume | 5 mL | Same |
| Calibrators (Adjustors) | Two levels of lyophilized CA15-3 in a non-human serum matrix | Same |
| Detection Antibody | Alkaline phosphatase (bovine calf intestine) conjugated to murine monoclonal anti-CA15-3 antibody | Same |
| Capture Antibody | Anti-CA15-3 murine monoclonal antibody | Same |
| General Device Characteristic Differences | | |
| Assay Modification | Modification of solid phase | No modification |
| Biotin Interference | Up to 3500 ng/mL | Up to 100 ng/mL |
K233946 - Page 4 of 11
{4}
| Detection Limit | Limit of Blank = 0.21 U/mL
Limit of Detection = 0.30 U/mL
Limit of Quantitation = 1 U/mL | Analytical Sensitivity: 1.0 U/mL |
| --- | --- | --- |
VI Standards/Guidance Documents Referenced:
The following Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines were used:
- CLSI EP05-A3, Evaluation of Precision of Quantitative Measurement Procedures, Approved Guideline – Third Edition
- CLSI EP06-A2, Evaluation of the Linearity of Quantitative Measurement Procedures – Second Edition
- CLSI EP07-A3, Interference Testing in Clinical Chemistry – Third Edition
- CLSI EP09c, Measurement Procedure Comparison and Bias Estimation Using Patient Samples – Third Edition
- CLSI EP17-A2, Evaluation of Detection Capability for Clinical Laboratory Measurement Procedures; Approved Guideline – Second Edition
- CLSI EP25-A, Evaluation of Stability of In Vitro Diagnostic Reagents; Approved Guideline
- CLSI EP28-A3c, Defining, Establishing, and Verifying Reference Intervals in the Clinical Laboratory, Approved Guideline – Third Edition
- CLSI EP34, Establishing and Verifying an Extended Measuring Interval Through Specimen Dilution and Spiking– First Edition
VII Performance Characteristics (if/when applicable):
A Analytical Performance:
1. Precision/Reproducibility:
The studies were performed following CLSI EP05-A3.
Within-laboratory precision
Five native pooled serum samples were assayed in two replicates per sample per run, two runs per day for 20 days using one lot of modified IMMULITE 2000 BR-MA assay on one IMMULITE 2000 analyzer (n=80 per sample). Samples 1 and 2 were prepared by mixing native serum samples from two individual patients while samples 3-5 were prepared by mixing native pooled serum samples into an individual native serum specimen. The data was analyzed using ANOVA for standard deviation (SD), % coefficient of variation (%CV) to evaluate within-run, between-run, between-day, and within-laboratory attributes for each sample. The results are summarized in the following table:
K233946 - Page 5 of 11
{5}
| Sample | Mean (U/mL) | Within-Run | | Between-Run | | Between-Day | | Within-Lab | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV |
| 1 | 21.0 | 1.12 | 5.3 | 1.08 | 5.2 | 0.00 | 0.0 | 1.56 | 7.4 |
| 2 | 38.7 | 1.85 | 4.8 | 2.02 | 5.2 | 0.00 | 0.0 | 2.74 | 7.1 |
| 3 | 79.0 | 4.35 | 5.5 | 3.70 | 4.7 | 0.00 | 0.0 | 5.71 | 7.2 |
| 4 | 175 | 8.86 | 5.1 | 8.65 | 4.9 | 1.53 | 0.9 | 12.48 | 7.1 |
| 5 | 234 | 16.0 | 6.8 | 6.37 | 2.7 | 0.00 | 0.0 | 17.22 | 7.4 |
Lot-to-lot imprecision
The study was performed at a single site with three assay lots. Samples 1-5, described above, were tested on one IMMULITE 2000 analyzer for five days, with five replicates per sample per run per day (N = 75 per sample). The data was analyzed using ANOVA for SD, %CV to evaluate within-run (repeatability), between-day, between-lot, reproducibility (total precision) attributes for each sample. The results are summarized in the following table:
| Sample | Mean (U/mL) | Within-Run | | Between-Day | | Between-Lot | | Total | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV |
| 1 | 20.7 | 0.88 | 4.3 | 0.65 | 3.1 | 0.00 | 0.0 | 1.09 | 5.3 |
| 2 | 39.9 | 1.72 | 4.3 | 0.51 | 1.3 | 0.00 | 0.0 | 1.80 | 4.5 |
| 3 | 77.6 | 3.96 | 5.1 | 2.50 | 3.2 | 0.00 | 0.0 | 4.69 | 6.0 |
| 4 | 176.1 | 9.34 | 5.3 | 0.00 | 0.0 | 0.00 | 0.0 | 9.34 | 5.3 |
| 5 | 234.2 | 12.98 | 5.5 | 0.00 | 0.0 | 3.6 | 1.5 | 13.45 | 5.7 |
2. Linearity:
The linearity study was conducted following CLSI EP06-Ed2. A panel of 10 dilution levels was prepared by mixing a high CA 15-3 pooled serum native sample with a low CA 15-3 native single serum sample to cover the claimed analytical measuring range of the IMMULITE 2000 BR-MA assay. Four replicates per sample were tested using three reagent lots on one IMMULITE 2000 analyzer. The data was analyzed using weighted least squares linear regression. Percent deviations from linearity were calculated as differences between the observed values (mean values) and the predicted values divided by the predicted values. The table below summarizes the linearity data analysis:
| Kit Lot | Dilution Range (U/mL) | Slope (95% CI) | Intercept (95% CI) | R² | % Deviation from Linearity |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | 0.72 – 385.86 | 1.02 (0.97; 1.07) | -0.08 (-0.35; 0.19) | 1.00 | 1.67 – 8.04 % |
| 2 | 0.85 – 404.92 | 0.99 (0.96; 1.02) | -0.01 (-0.16; 0.14) | 1.00 | 2.30 – 7.17% |
| 3 | 0.80 – 385.36 | 0.99 (0.96; 1.03) | -0.04 (-0.23; 0.15) | 1.00 | 1.51 – 8.45% |
K233946 - Page 6 of 11
{6}
The data support the linearity interval from 0.72 to 404.92 ng/mL with the deviations from linearity within ±10%. The study results support the linearity of the claimed analytical measuring interval (AMI): 1 – 300 U/mL.
## Automatic dilution versus manual dilution
To verify the auto dilution function on IMMULITE 2000 analyzer, one high sample (>300 U/mL) was diluted using the onboard dilution function and compared with dilution of the same sample that was manually diluted by the same dilution factor. The high native serum pool was diluted, using assay diluent 10x, 20x and 40x. The study was conducted on three lots of modified reagent packs on one IMMULITE 2000 analyzer with five replicates run per diluted sample. The dose by onboard dilution was compared to the dose obtained by manual dilution and % bias calculated and compared to the acceptance criteria. The study results support the automatic dilution function of IMMULITE 200 analyzer for the modified IMMULITE 2000 BR-MA.
## High Dose Hook Effect
The high-dose hook effect of the modified IMMULITE 2000 BR-MA assay was determined by testing dilutions of a sample with a concentration of approximately 140,000 U/mL CA 15-3. All samples were tested in duplicate using three modified reagent lots on one IMMULITE 2000 analyzer. The results showed no high dose hook effect up to 80,000 U/mL.
## 3. Analytical Specificity/Interference:
### Cross-reactivity
The cross-reactivity of the modified IMMULITE 2000 BR-MA assay with Alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), Cancer Antigen 125 (CA 125), Cancer Antigen 19-9 (CA19-9), and Carcinoembryonic Antigen (CEA) was evaluated by testing two patient serum sample pools at low level (between 4.7–5.6 U/mL) and one at a mid-level close to the cut-off (between 30–36 U/mL). Each substance was spiked into test samples, and control samples were prepared by spiking solvent into the samples. Samples were run in replicates of five using one modified reagent lot on one IMMULITE 2000 Analyzer. The cross-reactivity was calculated by comparing measurements of the test and control samples. No significant cross reactivity (≤ ±10% difference of test from control) for the modified IMMULITE 2000 BR-MA assay was observed up to the following concentrations of the potential cross-reacting substances tested:
| Cross-reacting Substance | Concentration |
| --- | --- |
| AFP | 5,000 IU/mL |
| CA 125 | 10,000 U/mL |
| CA 19-9 | 2,000 U/mL |
| CEA | 5,000 ng/mL |
### Interference
The interference of the modified IMMULITE 2000 BR-MA assay was performed following recommendations of CLSI EP07, 3rd Edition.
K233946 - Page 7 of 11
{7}
Potential endogenous and exogenous interfering substances were tested for their ability to interfere with the modified IMMULITE 2000 BR-MA assay using two serum samples with CA 15-3 concentration around 30 U/mL and 120 U/mL. For each interfering substance, test samples were spiked with the test substance and results were compared to control samples spiked with an equal volume of solvent. Samples were measured in three replicates except for biotin samples which were run in five replicates. The study was performed using one modified reagent lot run on one IMMULITE 2000 analyzer.
Human Anti-Mouse Antibodies (HAMA) interference was evaluated by testing two patient serum samples at ~8 U/mL and ~34 U/mL. The samples were spiked with commercially available HAMA serum. The spiked sample and the corresponding serum sample without HAMA were tested in five replicates using one modified reagent lot on one IMMULITE 2000 analyzer.
The interference was calculated by comparing the mean measurements of the test and control samples. No significant interference (≤ ±10% difference of test from control) were observed for the modified IMMULITE 2000 BR-MA assay up to the following concentrations for each endogenous and exogenous substances tested:
| Substance | Concentration |
| --- | --- |
| Endogenous: | |
| HAMA | 792 μg/mL |
| Hemoglobin | 381 mg/dL |
| Bilirubin (Conjugated) | 200 mg/L |
| Bilirubin (Unconjugated) | 200 mg/L |
| Intralipid | 3,000 mg/dL |
| Biotin | 3,500 ng/mL |
| Exogenous: | |
| 5-Fluorouracil | 1,000 μg/mL |
| Cisplatin | 100 μg/mL |
| Cyclophosphamide | 1,000 μg/mL |
| Doxorubicin Hydrochloride | 100 μg/mL |
| Mitomycin-C | 100 μg/mL |
| Vincristine | 1 μg/mL |
Alkaline phosphatase interference was not evaluated in this review but the package insert states that "(t)he drug asfotase alfa (STRENSIQ), a recombinant form of alkaline phosphatase, is expected to interfere with in vitro diagnostic assays utilizing an alkaline phosphatase detection system. Test samples from patients taking asfotase alfa with a non-alkaline phosphatase methodology."
4. Assay Reportable Range:
1 – 300 U/mL
5. Traceability, Stability, Expected Values (Controls, Calibrators, or Methods):
K233946 - Page 8 of 11
{8}
K233946 - Page 9 of 11
## Traceability
The assay is traceable to an internal standard; no international reference standard is available for CA 15-3 currently.
## Stability
The stability of the modified IMMULITE 2000 BR-MA assay is evaluated according to the recommendation of CLSI EP25-A.
**Shelf-life (unopened)**: A study was performed to establish the real-time shelf-life stability of the modified IMMULITE 2000 BR-MA. Three lots of modified reagents were stored in product storage conditions (2–8°C). Lots were tested using three commercial control samples, three standards, and three native pooled serum samples, each representing low, mid, and high CA 15-3 concentrations in replicates of five at the following time-points 0, 1, 2, 31, 45, 60, 91, 179, 225, 301, and 325 days on one IMMULITE 2000 analyzer. The data of each sample at each testing time point were compared to the data of initial value tested at baseline. The data supports the reagent stability of 301 days at 2–8°C. The stability study is ongoing.
**Open in-use stability**: The modified IMMULITE 2000 BR-MA assay was evaluated for in-use stability. One lot of reagent pack was opened, tested at time 0 and stored at 2–8°C. Three commercial control samples, three standards, and three native pooled serum samples, each representing low, mid, and high CA 15-3 concentrations, were tested in replicates of five at time-points 0, 31, 38, 60, 66, 90, and 98 days on one IMMULITE 2000 analyzer. The data of each sample at each testing time point were compared to the data of initial value tested at baseline. The data supports the open reagent pack stability of the modified IMMULITE 2000 BR-MA up to 90 days stored at 2–8°C after initial use.
## 6. Detection Limit:
Limit of blank (LoB), limit of detection (LoD) and limit of quantitation (LoQ) were established for modified IMMULITE 2000 BR-MA assay following the recommendations of CLSI EP17-A2.
The LoB was determined from the measurement of four analyte-free serum samples tested in five replicates per sample over three days using three modified reagent lots on one IMMULITE 2000 analyzer (60 measurement replicates per lot). The LoB was calculated using the classical non-parametric approach by establishing the 95% rank. The claimed LoB is 0.21 U/mL which is the highest LoB value observed across three reagent lots.
The LoD was determined from the measurement of eight low-level serum samples in five replicates, two runs per day over five days using three lots of modified reagents on one IMMULITE 2000 analyzer (400 measurements, per lot). The LoD was calculated as the LoB + 1.645 x SD of the replicates for the low-level samples. The claimed LoD is 0.30 U/mL which is the highest LoD value observed across lots.
The LoQ was determined based on the LoD study described above using the precision profile. LoQ was defined as the level meet the %CV of the within-lab imprecision of 20%. The claimed LoQ is 1 U/mL.
{9}
# 7. Assay Cut-Off:
The assay cut-off was established in K013984.
| Decision Point | Interpretation |
| --- | --- |
| < 38 U/mL | Normal |
| > 38 U/mL | Elevated |
# B Comparison Studies:
# 1. Method Comparison with Predicate Device:
A total of 315 native serum samples were tested in singlicate over eight days using three lots of the modified IMMULITE 2000 BR-MA assay and one lot of the predicate device (K013984) on one IMMULITE 2000 analyzer. The samples included 144 samples from patients with breast cancer, 50 samples from patients with non-breast cancer malignant disease, 61 samples from patients with non-cancer diseases, 49 samples from healthy females (24 pre-menopausal, 25 post-menopausal), and additional 11 contrived samples (pooled breast cancer samples) to cover the upper end of the measuring range. Each contrived sample was prepared by pooling two individual native breast cancer samples. Only the samples $(N = 274)$ within the measuring ranges of both the modified device and the predicate were analyzed by Passing-Bablok regression, and the results are summarized below:
| Lot # | N | Range (U/mL) | Slope (95% CI) | Intercept (95% CI) | Correlation Coefficient (r) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | 274 | 3.76 – 297.70 | 0.98 (0.96; 0.99) | 0.71 (0.22; 1.10) | 0.989 |
| 2 | 274 | 3.76 – 297.70 | 0.99 (0.97; 1.01) | 0.16 (-0.22; 0.64) | 0.992 |
| 3 | 274 | 3.76 – 297.70 | 1.04 (1.02; 1.05) | -0.79 (-1.29; -0.42) | 0.990 |
# 2. Matrix Comparison:
Matrix comparison study was performed to demonstrate that serum separator tube (SST), and lithium heparin plasma and EDTA plasma matrices yield comparable values as serum with the modified IMMULITE 2000 BR-MA assay. The 40 matched sample sets covering the analytical measuring interval (AMI) of the assay were tested in singleton using one modified reagent lot on IMMULITE 2000 analyzer. Passing-Bablok regression analyses were performed by comparing the results of samples from SST and different plasma samples (y) to the results of corresponding serum samples (x). The results are summarized in the tables below:
K233946 - Page 10 of 11
{10}
| | Range (U/mL) | Slope (95% CI) | Intercept (95% CI) | Correlation Coefficient (r) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| SST vs serum | 6.96 – 265.94 | 1.05 (0.98; 1.10) | -0.44 (-1.14; 1.00) | 0.997 |
| Li-heparin plasma vs serum | 6.96 – 265.94 | 0.96 (0.92; 0.99) | 0.09 (-0.81; 1.11) | 0.998 |
| EDTA plasma vs serum | 6.96 – 265.94 | 1.03 (0.94; 1.08) | -1.02 (-2.08; 0.85) | 0.998 |
| | SST vs. Serum | Lithium Heparin-Plasma vs. Serum | EDTA-Plasma vs. Serum |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Bias for modified IMMULITE 2000 BR-MA | | | |
| At cut-off 38 U/mL | 3.84% | -3.76% | 0.32% |
## C Clinical Studies:
Clinical studies were conducted in K013984.
## D Clinical Cut-Off:
Clinical cut-offs were established in K013984.
## E Expected Values/Reference Range:
To verify if the reference range of the modified IMMULITE 2000 BR-MA assay is the same as that established in K013984, a total of 69 samples (31 pre-menopausal and 38 post-menopausal female) from apparently healthy female individuals were tested per recommendations in CLSI EP28-A3c. The age cut-off of 50 years was used to define pre- and post-menopausal status of the donor. The samples were from subjects representing four major ethnic groups (41 Caucasian, 13 Hispanics, 10 African American, and 5 Asian). The samples were run in single replicate on three lots of each of the modified reagent kits and one reference lot of unmodified reagent lot on one IMMULITE 2000 analyzer. The unmodified assay’s reference range found that ≥ 90% of normal female samples fell within the range of the normal range described in K013984 as 6.4–58 U/mL. In each of the three modified lots, 65 of the 69 samples (94%) fell within this range, supporting a claim that there is no change of reference range established previously in K013984.
## VIII Proposed Labeling:
The labeling supports the finding of substantial equivalence for this device.
## IX Conclusion:
The submitted information in this premarket notification is complete and supports a substantial equivalence decision.
K233946 - Page 11 of 11
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.