Affera Mapping System (AFR-00003); Location Reference Patch Kit (AFR-00007); System Cart (AFR-00013)
K233943 · Medtronic, Inc. · DQK · Mar 8, 2024 · Cardiovascular
Device Facts
Record ID
K233943
Device Name
Affera Mapping System (AFR-00003); Location Reference Patch Kit (AFR-00007); System Cart (AFR-00013)
Applicant
Medtronic, Inc.
Product Code
DQK · Cardiovascular
Decision Date
Mar 8, 2024
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 870.1425
Device Class
Class 2
Indications for Use
Affera Mapping System: The Affera mapping system is intended to be used for catheter based cardiac electrophysiological mapping system allows pacing and real-time visualization of compatible catheters as well as display of cardiac maps in multiple formats. The acquired patient signals, including intracardiac electrograms, may also be recorded and displayed on the system's display screen. Location Reference Patch Kit: Refer to the instructions for use accompanying the compatible navigation-enabled electrophysiology catheter that is used with the compatible mapping system for the specific indications for use.
Device Story
Affera Mapping System uses magnetic localization technology to track compatible catheters equipped with passive magnetic sensors; system includes magnetic field generator placed under patient table, central interface unit, and workstation. Device inputs include magnetic sensor signals from catheters and patient electrograms (imported from hospital recording systems). System processes inputs to generate real-time 3D electroanatomical maps (geometric shell, voltage, activation, propagation) and provides lesion tagging. Used in clinical EP labs by physicians; system supports internal (up to 20 mA) and external pacing. Location Reference Patch Kit (disposable, hydrogel adhesive) provides patient position/movement reference via magnetic sensors to compensate for respiratory motion. Output displayed on workstation interface assists physicians in navigating catheters and performing ablation procedures. Benefits include real-time visualization and mapping to guide cardiac electrophysiology interventions.
Clinical Evidence
Clinical evaluation included investigator scoring of electroanatomical mapping from the Sphere-Per-AF study. Data compared Affera Mapping System against a control device. Primary endpoints included scoring of geometries, voltage maps, and activation maps. Results showed no statistical difference between investigational and control groups; investigator scoring was 'good' or better in ≥97% of cases across all mapping categories.
Technological Characteristics
Magnetic-based tracking system; includes magnetic field generator, central interface unit, and workstation. Location Reference Patch Kit uses hydrogel adhesive (ISO 10993-1 compliant). Connectivity includes integration with hospital recording systems and external stimulators. Software performs 3D mapping (geometric, voltage, activation, propagation). Electrical safety per IEC 60601; EMC/EMI testing completed.
Indications for Use
Indicated for patients undergoing catheter-based cardiac electrophysiological mapping and stimulation procedures.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A programmable diagnostic computer is a device that can be programmed to compute various physiologic or blood flow parameters based on the output from one or more electrodes, transducers, or measuring devices; this device includes any associated commercially supplied programs.
Predicate Devices
CARTO® 3 EP Navigation System Version 7.2 (K213264)
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image contains the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). On the left is the Department of Health & Human Services logo. To the right of that is the FDA logo, which is a blue square with the letters "FDA" in white. Underneath the square are the words "U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION" in blue.
March 8, 2024
Medtronic, Inc. Matthew Lobeck Principal Regulatory Affairs Specialist 8200 Coral Sea Street NE Mounds View, Minnesota 55112
Re: K233943
Trade/Device Name: AfferaTM Mapping System, AFR-00003 Location Reference Patch Kit, AFR-00007 System Cart, AFR-00013 Regulation Number: 21 CFR 870.1425 Regulation Name: Programmable Diagnostic Computer Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: DOK Dated: December 14, 2023 Received: December 14, 2023
Dear Matthew Lobeck:
We have reviewed your section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database available at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrb/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
{1}------------------------------------------------
Additional information about changes that may require a new premarket notification are provided in the FDA guidance documents entitled "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99812/download) and "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Software Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99785/download).
Your device is also subject to, among other requirements, the Quality System (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820), which includes, but is not limited to, 21 CFR 820.30. Design controls; 21 CFR 820.90. Nonconforming product; and 21 CFR 820.100, Corrective and preventive action. Please note that regardless of whether a change requires premarket review, the QS regulation requires device manufacturers to review and approve changes to device design and production (21 CFR 820.30 and 21 CFR 820.70) and document changes and approvals in the device master record (21 CFR 820.181).
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR Part 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reportingcombination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR Parts 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reportingmdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about mediation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advice-comprehensive-regulatoryassistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
Aneesh S. Deoras -S
Aneesh Deoras Assistant Director Division of Cardiac Electrophysiology,
{2}------------------------------------------------
Diagnostics and Monitoring Devices Office of Cardiovascular Devices Office of Product Evaluation and Quality Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{3}------------------------------------------------
# Indications for Use
Form Approved: OMB No. 0910-0120 Expiration Date: 07/31/2026 See PRA Statement below.
Submission Number (if known)
K233943
Device Name
Affera™ Mapping System, AFR-00003 Location Reference Patch Kit, AFR-00007 System Cart, AFR-00013
Indications for Use (Describe)
Affera Mapping System: The Affera mapping system is intended to be used for catheter based cardiac electrophysiological mapping system allows pacing and real-time visualization of compatible catheters as well as display of cardiac maps in multiple formats. The acquired patient signals, including intracardiac electrograms, may also be recorded and displayed on the system's display screen.
Location Reference Patch Kit: Refer to the instructions for use accompanying the compatible navigation-enabled electrophysiology catheter that is used with the compatible mapping system for the specific indications for use.
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
### CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
### *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{4}------------------------------------------------
# 510(k) Summary
| Date Summary Prepared: | December 14, 2023 |
|------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Applicant: | Medtronic, Inc.<br>8200 Coral Sea Street NE<br>Mounds View, MN U.S.A. 55112<br>1.800.328.2518<br>Establishment Registration No. 3001504994 |
| Official Correspondent: | Matthew Lobeck<br>Principal Regulatory Affairs Specialist<br>Medtronic<br>8200 Coral Sea Street<br>Mounds View, MN 55112<br>Mobile: 612-202-5925<br>Fax: 763.367.9903<br>Email: matthew.lobeck@medtronic.com |
| Device Trade Name and<br>Model: | Affera™ Mapping System, AFR-00003<br>Location Reference Patch Kit, AFR-00007<br>System Cart, AFR-00013 |
| Common Name: | Mapping system |
| Classification Name: | Computer, Diagnostic, Programmable |
| Classification & Panel: | Class II, 21 CFR 870.1425, Cardiovascular |
| Product Code: | DQK |
| 510(k) Number | K233943 |
| Predicate Device: | CARTO® 3 EP Navigation System Version 7.2<br>(K213264) |
| Device Description: | Affera Mapping System (AFR-00003):<br>The Affera Mapping System (mapping system) is a<br>computerized storage and display system with embedded<br>software designed to present the user with information<br>regarding the state and location of one or more magnetic<br>sensors connected to cardiac catheters. The mapping system<br>provides real-time visualization of compatible catheters as<br>well as display of cardiac maps in multiple formats. The<br>mapping system uses magnetic localization technology |
| similar to localization systems used in other EP mapping | |
| systems, with a magnetic field generator placed under the | |
| table and one or more passive magnetic sensors embedded in | |
| the catheter. | |
{5}------------------------------------------------
The Affera Mapping System connects to electrophysiology (EP) catheter lab equipment such as the EP recording system and external stimulators. The mapping system can also be connected to third-party intracardiac (IC) catheters to display electrograms from and deliver pacing stimuli.
The mapping system can be used with cardiac ablation systems for tracking and navigation of magnetic sensorequipped catheters during ablation procedures. When used with the Affera Ablation System, the mapping system displays ablation data on the workstation user interface.
Location Reference Patch Kit (AFR-00007): The Location Reference Patch (LRP) Kit is a disposable device sold separately from the mapping system. The LRP Kit includes two non-sterile single-use patches, each containing a passive magnetic location sensor, which are placed in fixed positions on the patient's body surface (one anterior (A-patch) and one posterior (P-patch) to detect respiratory motion and to provide information regarding patient position and movement, respectively. The LRP Kit employs a hydrogel adhesive material for skin contact and for repositioning/ reapplication, and which is intended for extended duration topical use.
- The Affera Mapping System and accessory devices are Intended Use: intended for catheter-based electrophysiological mapping and stimulation.
Affera Mapping System (AFR-00003): The Affera Indications for Use: mapping system is intended to be used for catheter-based cardiac electrophysiological mapping. The mapping system allows pacing and real-time visualization of compatible catheters as well as display of cardiac maps in multiple formats. The acquired patient signals, including intracardiac electrograms, may also be recorded and displayed on the system's display screen.
> Location Reference Patch Kit (AFR-00007): Refer to the instructions for use accompanying the compatible
{6}------------------------------------------------
navigation-enabled electrophysiology catheter that is used with the compatible mapping system for the specific indications for use.
# Comparison of Technological Characteristics:
A comparative overview of the subject and predicate devices is provided in the following table:
| Attribute | CARTO® 3 EP<br>Navigation System<br>Version 7.2<br>(K213264) | Affera Mapping System,<br>Location Reference<br>Patch Kit<br>(K233943) |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Intended Use | Catheter-based electrophysiological mapping and stimulation. | Same |
| Fundamental<br>Scientific<br>Technology<br>(Navigation/<br>localization) | Magnetic-based tracking of embedded sensor Impedance-based tracking of catheter electrodes | Magnetic-based tracking of embedded sensor |
| Key System<br>Components | Catheter and equipment interface unit (PIU) Magnetic field generator (Location Pad) Software and workstation | Catheter and equipment interface unit (CIU) Magnetic field generator Software and workstation |
| Electroanatomical Maps | 3D geometric shell, voltage, activation, and propagation maps | Same |
| Stimulation/pacing | Externally generated pacing only | Internally (20 mA max) and externally generated pacing |
| Location<br>Patch<br>Configuration | 3 back patches 3 chest patches | 1 back patch 1 chest patch |
| Location<br>Patch Design/<br>Function | System provides body surface reference via magnetic sensors to enable tracking of patient movement and its effect on catheter tracking and navigation. | Same |
There are no significant differences in the fundamental scientific technology between the predicate and subject devices. The Affera Mapping System and accessory devices share the same or similar technological characteristics with the predicate device:
{7}------------------------------------------------
- Same intended use
- Same fundamental scientific technology ● o Magnetic-based tracking of embedded sensor
- . Both devices utilize a central interface unit for connection with a workstation, compatible catheter, and magnetic field generator.
- . Both devices include proprietary software designed to present the user with information regarding the state and location of magnetic sensors for creation of electroanatomical maps (3D geometric shell, voltage, activation, and propagation maps), and lesion tagging.
- Similar patient data management functionality with respect to the features offered by the subject devices.
The differences in technological characteristics involve the following:
- Certain features offered by the predicate are not offered by the Affera Mapping System, such as:
- o ultrasound catheter and CFAE mapping
- O 12-Lead ECG Morphology Matching
- o Contact Force Indication
- certain image integration functionality. O
- Both subject and predicate devices utilize pacing ● stimuli generated from external sources (i.e. external recording system). Unlike the predicate device, the Affera Mapping System can also internally generate and route up to 20 mA pacing stimuli.
- . ECG signals are acquired by the predicate device using ECG patches connected directly to the central interface unit; whereas the Affera Mapping System utilizes ECG signals imported from hospital recording systems.
These changes do not constitute a difference in the fundamental scientific technology between the subject and predicate devices. The physical and technological characteristics of the subject and predicate devices are considered substantially equivalent and do not raise questions of safety or effectiveness.
# Safety and Performance Data:
Performance testing applicable to the subject devices was completed to ensure it performs as intended per the product specifications and requirements, including specifications and
{8}------------------------------------------------
requirements related to use with compatible catheters and ablation systems. The following testing has been completed in support of the Affera Mapping System and accessory devices, and all acceptance criteria were met in accordance with appropriate standards:
| Testing | Outcome |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Design Verification<br>Testing | Verification and validation activities conducted<br>on the Affera Mapping System and Location<br>Reference Patch Kit confirm that all user<br>requirements and product specifications have<br>been met. |
| Design Validation | |
| Performance-based<br>Characterization<br>Testing | Tracking and navigation performance of the<br>Affera Mapping System was further evaluated<br>via separate characterization testing. |
| Summative<br>Usability<br>Evaluation | Critical tasks related to the Affera Mapping<br>System and Location Reference Patch Kit were<br>independently evaluated via summative<br>usability studies. All tasks were completed with<br>no uncorrected Serious Use Errors attributable<br>to the design of the user interfaces. |
| Pre-clinical Animal<br>Testing | A chronic GLP study was completed to<br>evaluate the safety and performance of the<br>Affera Mapping System, including<br>electroanatomical mapping (EAM) in all four<br>chambers and an evaluation performance as<br>compared to prior experience with existing<br>mapping systems. All study endpoints were<br>met through the GLP study. |
| Software<br>Verification and<br>Validation Testing<br>and Cybersecurity | Software verification and validation was<br>successfully completed to ensure that all<br>specifications are met and that risk mitigations<br>have been successfully implemented. Controls<br>have been implemented as part of the design<br>and development of the Affera Mapping<br>System to assure medical device functionality<br>and safety with respect to cybersecurity. |
| Electrical Safety<br>and EMC Testing | System safety and electrical testing, including<br>IEC 60601 and EMC/EMI testing, has been<br>successfully completed on the Affera Mapping<br>System. |
| Biocompatibility<br>Testing<br>(AFR-00007) | The Location Reference Patch Kit (AFR-<br>00007) is a patient contacting device intended<br>for placement on intact skin for a limited<br>duration (< 24 hours) per ISO 10993-1.<br>Biocompatibility testing per ISO 10993-1:<br>2018 was successfully completed on the<br>Location Reference Patch Kit, including testing<br>for irritation, sensitization, and cytotoxicity. |
| Packaging<br>Validation | Packaging qualification including appropriate<br>pre-conditioning exposure was successfully<br>completed on the Affera Mapping System. |
| Clinical Evaluation | Investigator scoring of electroanatomical<br>mapping was collected from the Sphere-Per-AF |
| clinical study as a secondary performance<br>endpoint, including scoring using the Affera<br>Mapping System and a control device. | |
| Based on the mapping assessment data<br>reported, no statistical difference was found<br>between the investigational and control<br>populations across the investigator scoring of<br>geometries, voltage maps, and activation maps.<br>Investigator scoring was “good” or better in at<br>least 97% of cases across all mapping<br>categories for both treatment groups. | |
{9}------------------------------------------------
No questions of safety or effectiveness are raised as a result of the testing, and the subject devices are considered substantially equivalent to the predicate device based on the performance data collected.
#### Conclusion:
The subject and predicate devices share the same intended use and have similar underlying technological characteristics (i.e. magnetic-based tracking of embedded sensor). Differences between the subject and predicate devices do not result in differences in overall device performance or fundamental scientific technology, and the subject devices are considered substantially equivalent to the predicate device.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.