Atellica® CH High Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein 2 (hCRP2)
K233242 · Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics, Inc. · NQD · Jan 18, 2024 · Immunology
Device Facts
Record ID
K233242
Device Name
Atellica® CH High Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein 2 (hCRP2)
Applicant
Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics, Inc.
Product Code
NQD · Immunology
Decision Date
Jan 18, 2024
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 866.5270
Device Class
Class 2
Indications for Use
The Atellica® CH High Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein 2 (hCRP2) assay is for in vitro diagnostic use in the quantitative determination of the concentration of C-Reactive Protein (CRP) in human serum and plasma (lithium heparin, sodium heparin or K2 EDTA) on the Atellica® CH Analyzer. Measurements from Atellica® High Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein 2 (hCRP2) may be used as an aid in identification of individuals at risk for future cardiovascular disease. Measurement of hCRP2, when used in conjunction with traditional clinical laboratory evaluation of acute coronary syndromes, may be useful as an independent marker of prognosis for recurrent events in patients with stable coronary disease or acute coronary syndromes.
Device Story
The Atellica® CH hCRP2 assay is an in vitro diagnostic reagent kit used on the Atellica® CH Analyzer to quantify C-Reactive Protein (CRP) in human serum and plasma. The device utilizes particle-enhanced immunonephelometry; polystyrene particles coated with anti-CRP monoclonal antibodies aggregate in the presence of CRP, scattering light. The analyzer automatically dilutes samples, mixes them with reagents, incubates at 37°C, and measures light absorbance to determine concentration via comparison to a known standard. Used in clinical laboratories by trained personnel, the output provides a quantitative mg/L value. This result aids clinicians in assessing cardiovascular risk and prognosis for recurrent coronary events. The device benefits patients by providing an independent inflammatory marker to supplement traditional clinical evaluations.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. Performance validated via precision (CLSI EP05-A3), linearity (CLSI EP06-A), interference (CLSI EP07-ED3), and method comparison (CLSI EP09c) against predicate. Method comparison (N=100) showed slope 0.96, intercept 0.03, r=0.999. LoQ determined at 0.16 mg/L. No clinical trials performed.
Technological Characteristics
Quantitative immunonephelometric assay. Reagents: phosphate buffer, polidocanol, sodium azide, mouse anti-CRP monoclonal antibodies, polystyrene particles, human albumin. Form factor: ready-to-use reagent packs for Atellica® CH Analyzer. Connectivity: integrated with Atellica® CH system. Traceability: ERM-DA474/IFCC. Measuring range: 0.16–9.50 mg/L.
Indications for Use
Indicated for use in individuals to aid in the identification of risk for future cardiovascular disease and as a prognostic marker for recurrent events in patients with stable coronary disease or acute coronary syndromes.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A C-reactive protein immunological test system is a device that consists of the reagents used to measure by immunochemical techniques the C-reactive protein in serum and other body fluids. Measurement of C-reactive protein aids in evaluation of the amount of injury to body tissues.
{0}
FDA U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION
# 510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION DECISION SUMMARY
ASSAY ONLY
## I Background Information:
A 510(k) Number
K233242
B Applicant
Siemens HealthCare Diagnostics Inc.
C Proprietary and Established Names
Atellica® CH High Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein 2 (hCRP2)
D Regulatory Information
| Product Code(s) | Classification | Regulation Section | Panel |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| NQD | Class II | 21 CFR 866.5270 - C-Reactive Protein Immunological Test System | IM - Immunology |
## II Submission/Device Overview:
A Purpose for Submission:
New device
B Measurand:
C-Reactive Protein (high sensitivity)
C Type of Test:
Quantitative Immunonephelometry
Food and Drug Administration
10903 New Hampshire Avenue
Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
www.fda.gov
{1}
K233242 - Page 2 of 9
## III Intended Use/Indications for Use:
### A Intended Use(s):
See Indications for Use below.
### B Indication(s) for Use:
The Atellica® CH High Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein 2 (hCRP2) assay is for in vitro diagnostic use in the quantitative determination of the concentration of C-Reactive Protein (CRP) in human serum and plasma (lithium heparin, sodium heparin or K2 EDTA) on the Atellica® CH Analyzer.
Measurements from Atellica® High Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein 2 (hCRP2) may be used as an aid in identification of individuals at risk for future cardiovascular disease. Measurement of hCRP2, when used in conjunction with traditional clinical laboratory evaluation of acute coronary syndromes, may be useful as an independent marker of prognosis for recurrent events in patients with stable coronary disease or acute coronary syndromes.
### C Special Conditions for Use Statement(s):
Rx - For Prescription Use Only
### D Special Instrument Requirements:
Atellica® CH Analyzer, K151767
## IV Device/System Characteristics:
### A Device Description:
The Atellica® CH High Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein 2 (hCRP2) assay includes two ready-to-use reagent packs consisting of 23.1 mL Phosphate buffer, polidocanol (1.9 g/L), and sodium azide (0.1%) in Pack 1 and 12.3 mL Mouse anti-CRP monoclonal antibodies (13 mg/L), polystyrene particles (1 g/L), human albumin (0.05%) and sodium azide (<0.1%) in Pack 2. This product consists of two (2) kits consisting of 360 tests each for a total of 720 tests.
#### Kit Contents:
- Pack1 (P1)
- Well 1 (W1) 23.1 mL of Reagent 1
- Well 2 (W2) 23.1 mL of Reagent 1
- Pack 2 (P2)
- Well 1 (W1) 12.3 mL of Reagent 2
- Well 2 (W2) 12.3 mL of Reagent 2
#### Materials required but not provided:
- Atellica CH Analyzer
- Atellica CH PROT2 CAL
- Commercially available quality control materials
{2}
- Additional system fluids are required to operate the system: Atellica CH Diluent, Atellica CH Wash, Atellica CH Conditioner, Atellica CH Cleaner, Atellica CH Reagent Probe Cleaner 1, Atellica CH Reagent Probe Cleaner 2, Atellica CH Reagent Probe Cleaner 4, Atellica CH Lamp Coolant, and Atellica CH Water Bath Additive.
## B Principle of Operation:
Polystyrene particles coated with monoclonal antibodies specific to human CRP are aggregated when mixed with samples containing CRP. These aggregates scatter a beam of light passed through the sample. The intensity of the scattered light is proportional to the concentration of the respective protein in the sample. The result is evaluated by comparison with a standard of known concentration.
## V Substantial Equivalence Information:
### A Predicate Device Name(s):
CardioPhase® hsCRP
### B Predicate 510(k) Number(s):
K212559
### C Comparison with Predicate(s):
| Device & Predicate Device(s): | K233242 | K212559 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Device Trade Name | Atellica® CH High Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein 2 (hCRP2) | CardioPhase® hsCRP |
| General Device Characteristic Similarities | | |
| Intended Use/Indications For Use | For quantitative determination of C-reactive protein (CRP) in human serum and plasma | Same |
| Assay Principle | Particle enhanced immunonephelometry | Same |
| Traceability/Standardization | ERM-DA474/IFCC | Same |
| Calibration | Multi-Level calibration | Same |
| General Device Characteristic Differences | | |
| Assay Range / Measuring Interval | 0.16 mg/L - 9.50 mg/L | 0.155 – 9.95 mg/L (calibrator lot dependent) |
| Calibrators | Atellica® CH Protein 2 Calibrator (PROT2 | N Rheumatology Standard SL |
K233242 - Page 3 of 9
{3}
| | CAL) | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Reagent Formulation | Pack 1: 23.1 mL Phosphate buffer; polidocanol (1.9 g/L); sodium azide (0.1%)
Pack 2: 12.3 mL Mouse anti-CRP monoclonal antibodies (13 mg/L); polystyrene particles (1 g/L); human albumin (0.05%); sodium azide (<0.1%) | Polystyrene particles coated with mouse monoclonal antibodies (< 0.016 g/L) to CRP and preservatives (Gentamicin 6.25 mg/L, Amphotericin 0.625 mg/L). |
| Sample stability | Room temperature: Up to 26 hours
2–8°C: Up to 188 hours
Frozen at -20°C: 2 years | 2–8°C: eight days
Frozen ≤ -20°C: up to eight months if frozen within 24 hours after collection and if repeated freeze-thaw cycles are avoided |
VI Standards/Guidance Documents Referenced:
CLSI EP05-A3, Evaluation of Precision of Quantitative Measurement Procedures; Approved Guideline - Third Edition.
CLSI EP17-A2, Evaluation of Detection Capability for Clinical Laboratory Measurement Procedures; Approved Guideline-2nd Edition.
CLSI EP06 -ED2:2020, Evaluation of Linearity of Quantitative Measurement Procedures, 2nd Edition.
CLSI EP07, Interference Testing in Clinical Chemistry, 3rd Edition.
CLSI EP37, Supplemental Tables for Interference Testing in Clinical Chemistry, 1st Edition.
Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff: Review Criteria for Assessment of C-Reactive Protein (CRP), High Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (hsCRP) and Cardiac C-Reactive Protein (cCRP) Assays. Issued on September 22, 2005.
K233242 - Page 4 of 9
{4}
VII Performance Characteristics (if/when applicable):
A Analytical Performance:
1. Precision/Reproducibility:
Precision studies were performed according to CLSI EP05-A3. Repeatability and within-lab precision were evaluated by testing five native serum samples and one quality control sample in duplicate twice per day for twenty days using three lots of the candidate device. Results from multiple lots were similar with results from one representative lot provided in the table below:
| Sample | N | Mean mg/L | Repeatability | | Within-Lab | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | | SD mg/L | CV (%) | SD mg/L | CV (%) |
| QC1 | 80 | 0.81 | 0.017 | 2.1 | 0.020 | 2.5 |
| Serum 1 | 80 | 1.06 | 0.015 | 1.4 | 0.017 | 1.6 |
| Serum 2 | 80 | 2.55 | 0.021 | 0.8 | 0.048 | 1.9 |
| Serum 3 | 80 | 2.90 | 0.015 | 0.5 | 0.023 | 0.8 |
| Serum 4 | 80 | 4.12 | 0.030 | 0.7 | 0.084 | 2.0 |
| Serum 5 | 80 | 8.74 | 0.065 | 0.7 | 0.110 | 1.3 |
Reproducibility was evaluated using three pooled serum samples and three quality control samples assayed with five replicates per run for five days using three instruments and three reagent lots. The data was analyzed to calculate the following components of precision: repeatability, between-day, between-lot, between-instrument, and reproducibility (total). The results are shown below.
| Sample | N | Mean mg/L | Reproducibility | | | | | | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | | Repeatability | | Between Day | | Between Lot | | Between Instrument | | Total Reproducibility | |
| | | | SD mg/L | CV % | SD mg/L | CV % | SD mg/L | CV % | SD mg/L | CV % | SD mg/L | CV % |
| QC1 | 225 | 0.72 | 0.012 | 1.6 | 0.001 | 0.2 | 0.005 | 0.6 | 0.013 | 1.8 | 0.018 | 2.5 |
| QC2 | 225 | 1.86 | 0.012 | 0.6 | 0.008 | 0.4 | 0.007 | 0.4 | 0.017 | 0.9 | 0.023 | 1.2 |
| QC3 | 225 | 5.63 | 0.030 | 0.5 | 0.018 | 0.3 | 0.026 | 0.5 | 0.029 | 0.5 | 0.052 | 0.9 |
| Serum 1 | 225 | 1.06 | 0.017 | 1.6 | 0.008 | 0.8 | 0.000 | 0.0 | 0.014 | 1.3 | 0.023 | 2.2 |
| Serum 2 | 225 | 2.91 | 0.023 | 0.8 | 0.014 | 0.5 | 0.000 | 0.0 | 0.016 | 0.5 | 0.032 | 1.1 |
| Serum 3 | 225 | 3.98 | 0.021 | 0.5 | 0.018 | 0.4 | 0.023 | 0.6 | 0.030 | 0.7 | 0.047 | 1.2 |
| Serum 4 | 225 | 7.12 | 0.045 | 0.6 | 0.031 | 0.4 | 0.017 | 0.2 | 0.064 | 0.9 | 0.086 | 1.2 |
| Serum 5 | 225 | 8.56 | 0.059 | 0.7 | 0.062 | 0.7 | 0.002 | 0.0 | 0.047 | 0.5 | 0.098 | 1.1 |
2. Linearity:
Linearity studies were performed according to CLSI EP06-A. A native high and low serum sample were used as the high and low samples. A dilution series composed of nine levels
K233242 - Page 5 of 9
{5}
distributed across the analytical measuring range was prepared by mixing the high and low samples. Measurements were made in replicates of five per level using three reagent lots. The linearity study results support that the assay is linear across the claimed reportable range from 0.16 to 9.50 mg/L.
## 3. Analytical Specificity/Interference:
Interference testing was performed in accordance with CLSI EP07-ED3. Testing of hemolysis, icterus, and lipemia was conducted comparing a sample spiked with interferent to a sample spiked with control material. Three replicates were tested. Percent interference was calculated. Interference is defined as a bias >10% when compared to the control sample. The results are summarized in the table below:
| Substance | Highest concentration tested that did not show significant interference |
| --- | --- |
| Hemoglobin | 1000 mg/dL |
| Conjugated Bilirubin | 40 mg/dL |
| Unconjugated Bilirubin | 40 mg/dL |
| Lipemia (from Intralipid®) | 3000 mg/dL |
| Rheumatoid Factor | 500 IU/mL |
CRP (high sensitivity) prozone study:
A study was performed to verify the CRP prozone performance. Samples were created using saline-diluted spiking material and tested in singlicate using one reagent lot. Results support that levels as high as 1300.00 mg/L will report > 9.50 mg/L. The labeling states: "High C-reactive protein levels can cause a paradoxical decrease in signal as a result of the high-dose hook effect. In the Atellica® CH hCRP2 assay, C-reactive protein levels as high as 1300.00 mg/L will read > 9.50 mg/L."
## 4. Assay Reportable Range:
The assay's reportable range is 0.16 mg/L to 9.50 mg/L.
## 5. Traceability, Stability, Expected Values (Controls, Calibrators, or Methods):
### Traceability
The assay is traceable to the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (IFCC) reference material ERM-DA474/IFCC.
### Sample stability
A study was conducted to verify sample stability with the candidate device. The results support the sponsor's sample stability claims that serum, sodium heparin plasma, lithium heparin plasma, and potassium EDTA plasma can be stored at Room Temperature (18-26 °C) for up to 26 hours, refrigerated (2-8 °C) for up to 188 hours and Frozen (-20 °C) for up to 2 years.
K233242 - Page 6 of 9
{6}
K233242 - Page 7 of 9
6. Detection Limit:
Detection capability was determined in accordance with CLSI EP17-A2.
The Limit of Blank (LoB) corresponds to the highest value expected in a series of results on a sample that contains no analyte. LoB was determined using six blank samples, 5 lots of Atellica CH diluent (saline) and 1 lot of 6% BSA, tested using three reagent lots on one instrument in replicates of five for three days, for 90 measurements per reagent lot and a total of 270 blank measurements.
The Limit of Detection (LoD) is the lowest concentration of c-reactive protein that can be detected with a probability of 95%. LoD was determined using five separate human serum samples, diluted with Atellica CH diluent targeted to 0.05 mg/L, tested using three reagent lots on one instrument in replicates of five for three days, for 75 measurements per reagent lot and a total of 225 low level measurements.
The Limit of Quantitation (LoQ) is the lowest concentration of c-reactive protein that met the required analyte level but did not reach 20% CV. LoQ was determined using five separate human serum samples, diluted with Atellica CH diluent targeted to approximately 0.16 mg/L, tested using three reagent lots on one instrument in replicates of five for five days.
Detection Limit Summary
| Analyte | LoB | LoD | LoQ |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Atellica® CH hCRP2 | 0.06 mg/L | 0.11 mg/L | 0.16 mg/L |
7. Assay Cut-Off:
Not applicable.
B Comparison Studies:
1. Method Comparison with Predicate Device:
Method comparison studies were conducted based on CLSI EP09c. One-hundred native serum samples that ranged from 0.26 - 9.41 mg/L CRP were tested with the candidate device and the predicate device. A single replicate was tested and processed for each sample on both systems. The method comparison study was evaluated by weighted Deming regression analysis. The regression analysis is summarized below:
| N | Slope | Intercept | r | Test Range (mg/L) | Claimed Measuring Range (mg/L) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 100 | 0.96 | 0.03 | 0.999 | 0.26 – 9.41 | 0.16 - 9.50 |
{7}
K233242 - Page 8 of 9
2. Matrix Comparison:
A matrix comparison study was performed to demonstrate the equivalence between serum and plasma samples when measuring CRP using the candidate device. Matched native human serum and plasma (Sodium Heparin, K2 EDTA and Lithium Heparin) samples were tested in singlicate on the Atellica® CH Analyzer. Sixty samples were tested across the assay range. Five samples fell outside the measuring range (three below, two above) with fifty-five total samples remaining. The results were analyzed using Deming regression with the following results.
| Specimen Type | N | Slope | Intercept | r | Test Range (mg/L) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Sodium Heparin | 55 | 1.070 | -0.020 | 0.998 | 0.22 - 7.40 |
| K2 EDTA | 55 | 0.970 | -0.030 | 0.997 | |
| Lithium Heparin | 55 | 1.070 | -0.030 | 0.998 | |
C Clinical Studies:
1. Clinical Sensitivity:
Not applicable.
2. Clinical Specificity:
Not applicable.
3. Other Clinical Supportive Data (When 1. and 2. Are Not Applicable):
Not applicable.
D Clinical Cut-Off:
Not applicable.
{8}
K233242 - Page 9 of 9
E Expected Values/Reference Range:
| Group | Specimen Type | Reference Interval mg/L |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Low risk for cardiovascular disease prediction | Serum/plasma | < 1.00 |
| Average risk for cardiovascular disease prediction | Serum/plasma | 1.00-3.00 |
| High risk for cardiovascular disease prediction | Serum/plasma | > 3.00 |
Pearson TA, Mensah GA, Alexander RW, Anderson JL, Cannon RO 3rd, Criqui M, Fadl YY, Fortmann SP, Hong Y, Myers GL, Rifai N, Smith SC Jr, Taubert K, Tracy RP, Vinicor F; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; American Heart Association. Markers of inflammation and cardiovascular disease: application to clinical and public health practice: A statement for healthcare professionals from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2003 Jan 28;107(3):499-511
VIII Proposed Labeling:
The labeling supports the finding of substantial equivalence for this device.
IX Conclusion:
The submitted information in this premarket notification is complete and supports a substantial equivalence decision.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.