K232985 · Lg Electronics.Inc · PGY · Dec 11, 2023 · Radiology
Device Facts
Record ID
K232985
Device Name
24HR513C
Applicant
Lg Electronics.Inc
Product Code
PGY · Radiology
Decision Date
Dec 11, 2023
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 892.2050
Device Class
Class 2
Indications for Use
This Medical Monitor is indicated for use in displaying radiological images for review, analysis, and diagnosis by trained medical practitioners. The display is not intended for mammography.
Device Story
The 24HR513C is a medical-grade TFT LCD monitor designed for displaying high-resolution color and grayscale radiological images within PACS and radiology environments. It serves as a visual interface for trained medical practitioners to review, analyze, and diagnose medical images. The device receives video input signals (DVI, DP, HDMI) from a host workstation and renders them for clinical viewing. It does not perform automated image analysis or diagnostic processing; it functions as a display peripheral. The monitor is calibrated using LG Calibration Studio Medical software to ensure accurate grayscale-to-luminance mapping and color tracking. By providing high-fidelity visualization, it supports clinical decision-making by enabling practitioners to interpret diagnostic images accurately. It is intended for use in clinical settings where radiological review is performed.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical studies were performed. Substantial equivalence is supported by bench testing, including electrical safety, electromagnetic compatibility, and display performance measurements (spatial resolution, pixel defects, artifacts, temporal response, luminance, grayscale-to-luminance function, and color tracking) in accordance with FDA guidance for diagnostic radiology display devices.
Technological Characteristics
TFT LCD medical monitor. Resolution: 1920x1200 (landscape) or 1200x1920 (portrait). Pixel pitch: 0.27 x 0.27 mm. Connectivity: DVI, DP, HDMI inputs; DP output. Calibration: LG Calibration Studio Medical software. Standards: IEC 60601-1:2005/AMD2:2020, EN 60601-1-2:2015/A1:2021, IEC 60601-1-6:2010+A1:2013+A2:2020.
Indications for Use
Indicated for trained medical practitioners to display, review, analyze, and diagnose radiological images. Not for mammography.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A medical image management and processing system is a device that provides one or more capabilities relating to the review and digital processing of medical images for the purposes of interpretation by a trained practitioner of disease detection, diagnosis, or patient management. The software components may provide advanced or complex image processing functions for image manipulation, enhancement, or quantification that are intended for use in the interpretation and analysis of medical images. Advanced image manipulation functions may include image segmentation, multimodality image registration, or 3D visualization. Complex quantitative functions may include semi-automated measurements or time-series measurements.
Special Controls
*Classification.* Class II (special controls; voluntary standards—Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) Std., Joint Photographic Experts Group (JPEG) Std., Society of Motion Picture and Television Engineers (SMPTE) Test Pattern).
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image contains the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). On the left is the Department of Health & Human Services logo. To the right of that is the FDA logo, which is a blue square with the letters "FDA" in white. To the right of the blue square is the text "U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION" in blue.
LG Electronics Inc. % JongHyun Kim Chief Consultant GMS Consulting #B-612, 66 Chengcho-ro Gyeonggi-do, Goyang-si 10543 Korea, South
Re: K232985
December 11, 2023
Trade/Device Name: 24hr513c Regulation Number: 21 CFR 892.2050 Regulation Name: Medical image management and processing system Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: PGY Dated: November 22, 2023 Received: November 22, 2023
Dear JongHyun Kim:
We have reviewed your section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database available at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Additional information about changes that may require a new premarket notification are provided in the FDA guidance documents entitled "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99812/download) and "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Software Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99785/download).
{1}------------------------------------------------
Your device is also subject to, among other requirements, the Quality System (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820), which includes, but is not limited to, 21 CFR 820.30, Design controls; 21 CFR 820.90, Nonconforming product; and 21 CFR 820.100, Corrective and preventive action. Please note that regardless of whether a change requires premarket review. the OS regulation requires device manufacturers to review and approve changes to device design and production (21 CFR 820.30 and 21 CFR 820.70) and document changes and approvals in the device master record (21 CFR 820.181).
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR Part 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reportingcombination-products): good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (OS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR Parts 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reportingmdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about mediation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advice-comprehensive-regulatoryassistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
Jessica Lamb
Jessica Lamb, Ph.D. Assistant Director Imaging Software Team DHT8B: Division of Radiological Imaging Devices and Electronic Products OHT8: Office of Radiological Health Office of Product Evaluation and Quality Center for Devices and Radiological Health
{2}------------------------------------------------
# Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K232985
Device Name 24HR513C
Indications for Use (Describe)
This Medical Monitor is indicated for use in displaying radiological images for review, analysis, and diagnosis by trained medical practitioners. The display is not intended for mammography.
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
X Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
| Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
#### CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
#### *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
# K232985 510(k) Summary
[As Required by 21 CFR 807.92]
#### 1. Date Prepared [21 CFR 807.92(a)(a)]
SEPT 22, 2023
#### 2. Submitter's Information [21 CFR 807.92(a)(1)]
- Name of Sponsor: ● LG Electronics Inc.
- 222, LG-ro, Cheongho-ri, Jinwi-myeon, Pyeongtaek si, -Address:
- Gyeonggi-do, 17709, Republic of Korea
- -Contact Name: Jinhwan Jun / Chief Research Engineer
- Telephone No .: +82-31-8066-5641 -
- Email Address: jinhwan.jun@lge.com -
- Name of Manufacturer: LG Electronics Inc. Address: 168, Suchul-daero, Gumi-si, Gyeongsangbuk-do, -39368, Republic of Korea
#### 3. Trade Name, Common Name, Classification [21 CFR 807.92(a)(2)]
- Trade Name: 24HR513C
- Common Name: Medical Monitor ●
- Classification: ●
| Classification Name | Medical image management and processing system |
|-----------------------|------------------------------------------------|
| Classification Number | 21 CFR 892.2050 |
| Product Code | PGY |
| Device Class | II |
| Review Panel | Radiology |
{4}------------------------------------------------
#### 4. Identification of Predicate Device(s) [21 CFR 807.92(a)(3)[
The identified predicate devices within this submission are shown as follow;
#### Primary Predicate Device
| 510(k) Number:<br>• | K223789 |
|----------------------------|------------------------------------------------|
| Applicant:<br>• | LG Electronics |
| Classification Name:<br>• | Medical image management and processing system |
| Trade Name:<br>• | 21HQ513D |
| Secondary Predicate Device | |
| • 510(k) Number: | K221136 |
|------------------------|------------------------------------------------|
| • Applicant: | EIZO Corporation |
| • Classification Name: | Medical image management and processing system |
| • Trade Name: | RadiForce MX243W |
#### 5. Description of the Device [21 CFR 807.92(a)(4)]
The Medical monitor is intended to provide high resolution color and grayscale medical imaging for PACS and Radiology system. This Medical Monitor is intended to be used by trained medical practitioners for displaying, reviewing, and analysis of medical images.
#### 6. Indications for use [21 CFR 807.92(a)(5)]
This Medical Monitor is indicated for use in displaying radiological images for review, analysis, and diagnosis by trained medical practitioners. The display is not intended for mammography.
{5}------------------------------------------------
## 7. Technological Characteristics (Equivalence to Predicate Device) [21 CFR 807.92(a)(6)]
The table below presents comparisons between the subject device (24HR513C) and the legally marketed predicate devices (K223789 and K221136):
| | Proposed Device | Primary Predicate Device | |
|-----------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------|
| K Number | K232985 | K223789 | |
| Manufacturer | LG Electronics Inc. | LG Electronics Inc. | |
| Model Name | 24HR513C | 21HQ513D | |
| Classification Name | Medical image management<br>and processing system | Medical image management<br>and processing system | |
| Classification Number | 21 CFR 892.2050 | 21 CFR 892.2050 | |
| Indications for Use | This Medical Monitor is<br>indicated for use in displaying<br>radiological images for review,<br>analysis, and diagnosis by<br>trained medical practitioners.<br>The display is not intended for<br>mammography. | This Medical Monitor is<br>indicated for use in displaying<br>radiological images for review,<br>analysis, and diagnosis by<br>trained medical practitioners.<br>The display is not intended for<br>mammography. | |
| Power Consumption | MAX. 65W<br>Sleep Mode (Standby Mode):<br>≤ 0.5W<br>Off Mode ≤ 0.3W | MAX. 120W<br>Off Mode ≤ 0.3W | |
| LCD Screen | TFT LCD | TFT LCD | |
| Pixel Pitch | 0.27 x 0.27 mm | 0.2115 x 0.2115 mm | |
| Resolution | Max<br>Resolution/<br>Recommended<br>Resolution | 1920 x 1200<br>@ 60Hz<br>([Screen<br>Rotation]:<br>[Landscape])<br>1200 x 1920<br>@ 60Hz<br>([Screen<br>Rotation]:<br>[Portrait -<br>90°],<br>[Portrait +90<br>°]) | 1,536 x 2,048 pixels |
| Horizontal Frequency | 30 kHz to 83kHz<br>([Screen Rotation]:<br>[Landscape])<br>30 kHz to 120kHz ([Screen<br>Rotation]: [Portrait -90°],<br>[Portrait +90 °]) | 30 Hz to 130 Hz | |
| Vertical Frequency | 56 Hz to 61 Hz | 56 Hz to 61 Hz | |
| Input video signals | DVI IN x 1 | DisplayPort x 2 | |
{6}------------------------------------------------
| | DP IN x 1<br>HDMI x 1 | DVI-IN x 1 | |
|-----------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------|
| Calibration tools | Calibration software:<br>LG Calibration Studio Medical | Calibration software:<br>PerfectLum / LG Calibration<br>Studio Medical | |
| | Proposed Device | Secondary Predicate Device | |
| K Number | K232985 | K221136 | |
| Manufacturer | LG Electronics Inc. | EIZO Corporation | |
| Model Name | 24HR513C | RadiForce MX243W | |
| Classification Name | Medical image management<br>and processing system | Medical image management<br>and processing system | |
| Classification Number | 21 CFR 892.2050 | 21 CFR 892.2050 | |
| Indications for Use | This Medical Monitor is<br>indicated for use in displaying<br>radiological images for review,<br>analysis, and diagnosis by<br>trained medical practitioners.<br>The display is not intended for<br>mammography. | This Product is indicated for<br>use in displaying radiological<br>images for review, analysis,<br>and diagnosis by trained<br>medical practitioners. The<br>display is not intended for<br>mammography. | |
| Power Consumption | MAX. 65W<br>Sleep Mode (Standby Mode): ≤<br>0.5W<br>Off Mode ≤ 0.3W | MAX. 56W<br>Off Mode: 0.6W or less | |
| LCD Screen | TFT LCD | TFT LCD | |
| Pixel Pitch | 0.27 x 0.27 mm | 0.27 x 0.27 mm | |
| Resolution | Max<br>Resolution/<br>Recommended<br>Resolution | 1920 x 1200<br>@ 60Hz<br>([Screen<br>Rotation]:<br>[Landscape])<br><br>1200 x 1920<br>@ 60Hz<br>([Screen<br>Rotation]:<br>[Portrait -<br>90o],<br>[Portrait +90<br>o]) | 1920 x 1200 |
| Horizontal Frequency | 30 kHz to 83kHz<br>([Screen Rotation]:<br>[Landscape])<br><br>30 kHz to 120kHz ([Screen<br>Rotation]: [Portrait -90o],<br>[Portrait +90 o]) | 31 - 76 kHz | |
| Vertical Frequency | 56 Hz to 61 Hz | 59 - 61 Hz | |
| Input video signals | DVI IN x 1<br>DP IN x 1<br>HDMI x 1 | DVD-D x 1<br>DisplayPort x 1 | |
| Output video signals | DP Out x 1 | DisplayPort x 1 | |
| Calibration tools | Calibration software: | Calibration software: RadiCS | |
The comparison table shows that the subject device (24HR513C) has the similar indications for use the primary predicate device. Although the devices have some different technological characteristics (Power Consumption, Pixel Pitch, Resolution, horizontal/vertical frequency and input/output video signals) these differences do not make the subject device less safe and reliable, so the subject device fits for diagnostic use as the predicate device does. There are no significant differences in the technological characteristics of the subject device. All the differences between the subject and predicate device do not raise different questions of safety and effectiveness. It is substantially equivalent to a predicate device in indications for use and technology characteristics.
{7}------------------------------------------------
|--|
{8}------------------------------------------------
| | LG Calibration Studio Medical |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------|
| The comparison table shows that the subject device (24HR513C) has the similar indications for use<br>the Secondary predicate device. Although the devices have some different technological<br>characteristics (Power Consumption, Pixel Pitch, Resolution, horizontal/vertical frequency and | |
input/output video signals), these differences do not make the subject device less safe and reliable, so the subject device fits for diagnostic use as the predicate device does. There are no significant differences in the technological characteristics of the subject device. All the differences between the subject and predicate device do not raise different questions of safety and effectiveness. It is substantially equivalent to a predicate device in indications for use and technology characteristics.
{9}------------------------------------------------
## 8. Non-Clinical Test summary
#### 1) Electrical Safety and Electromagnetic Compatibility
The test results demonstrated that the proposed device complies with the following standards:
- -Electrical Basic Safety and Essential Performance requirements in accordance with IEC 60601-1:2005/AMD2:2020
- -Electromagnetic Compatibility Testing in accordance with EN 60601-1-2:2015(IEC 60601-1-2:2014)/ EN 60601-1-2:2015/A1:2021 (IEC 60601-1-2:2014/AMD1:2020)
- -Medical Electrical Equipment - Part 1-6: General Requirements for Basic Safety and Essential Performance -Collateral Standard: Usability in accordance with IEC 60601-1-6:2010+A1:2013+A2:2020
### 2) Software Validation
The software was designed and developed according to IEC 62304 software development process and was verified and validated. According to the guidance, we evaluated the level of Basic level documentation by identifying safety-related characteristics for device documentation level.
- -The software information is provided in accordance with FDA guidance: Content of Premarket Submissions for Device Software Functions: Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff', issued on JUNE 2023.
## 3) Guidance
- Display Devices for Diagnostic Radiology Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff, issued on SEPT 2022.
| Measurements | Description | SE Note |
|-----------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------|
| a. Spatial resolution | Measurements of the transfer of<br>information from the image data to<br>the luminance fields at different<br>spatial frequencies of interest<br>typically done by reporting the<br>modulation transfer function. Non-<br>isotropic resolution properties should<br>be characterized properly by<br>providing two-dimensional<br>measurements or measurements<br>along at least two representative<br>axes.<br>(Using TG18 QC Test Pattern) | Equivalent |
| b. Pixel defects | Measurements (count, types (e.g.,<br>sub-pixel or entire pixel, always-on,<br>always-off), and locations (map) of<br>pixel defects. This is typically<br>provided as a tolerance limit. Pixel<br>defects can interfere with the visibility<br>of small details in medical images. | Equivalent |
| c. Artifacts | Evaluate for image artifacts such as<br>ghosting and/or image sticking from | Same |
According to the quidance, we test following performance items:
{10}------------------------------------------------
| Measurements | Description | SE Note |
|-----------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------|
| | displaying a fixed test pattern for a period of time.<br>(Using 5x5 mosaic pattern, 64Gray / 127 Gray judgment) | |
| d. Temporal response | Measurements of the temporal behavior of the display in responding to changes in image values from frame to frame. Since these transitions are typically not symmetric, rise and fall time constants are needed to characterize the system. Slow displays can alter details and contrast of the image when large image stacks are browsed or in video, panning, and zooming modes. | Equivalent |
| e. Luminance | Measurements of the maximum and minimum luminance that the device outputs as used in the application under recommended conditions and the achievable values if the device is set to expand the range to the limit. | Same |
| f. Conformance to a grayscale-to-luminance function | Measurements of the mapping between image values and the luminance output following a target model response for 256 or more levels. | Equivalent |
| g. Color tracking | Chromaticity at different luminance levels of primary colors as indicated by the color coordinates in an appropriate units system (e.g., CIE u'v') and the color gamut enveloped by the primary colors. | Equivalent |
According to the above test results, there are no significant performance differences between 24HR513C and the predicate devices that would adversely affect the use of the product. It has substantially equivalent performance compared to the predicate devices.
#### Clinical Test Summary:
No clinical studies were considered necessary and performed.
{11}------------------------------------------------
# 9. Conclusion [21 CFR 807.92(b)(3)]
In according with the Federal Food & Drug and cosmetic Act, 21 CFR Part 807, and based on the information provided in this premarket notification LG Electronics, concludes that the 24HR513C is substantially equivalent in safety and effectiveness to the predicate devices as described herein.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.