The ICP Monitor is intended for use as an interface between compatible strain gauge type pressure transducers and standard physiological pressure monitoring systems. The ICP Monitor is also intended for use as an independent pressure monitor for displaying the mean, systolic and diastolic values of a physiologic pressure waveform in the absence of an external patient monitor. The CereLink ICP Extension cable is intended for use as a connecting cable between the ICP input channel of the CereLink ICP Monitor and a CereLink ICP Sensor.
Device Story
CereLink ICP Monitor interfaces with strain gauge pressure transducers to monitor intracranial pressure (ICP) in ICU/OR settings. Device receives input from implanted solid-state sensors via extension cable; processes signals to display mean, systolic, diastolic values, and waveforms. Features include trend statistics (PTD, time above threshold, boxplot, histogram), 14-day mean data storage, 24-hour waveform storage, and USB data streaming. Operated by clinicians; provides real-time monitoring and alarm activation for out-of-limit pressures. Output displayed on 7-inch touch screen or transmitted to external patient monitors. Modification adds electrically isolated patient lead with pinch connector to extension cable to provide electrical equilibrium, preventing DC negative offset and associated out-of-range failures. Benefits include reliable, continuous ICP monitoring and improved troubleshooting for signal stability.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical studies were required. Evidence consists of bench testing, biocompatibility (ISO 10993-5, -10, -23), and electrical safety/EMC testing (IEC 60601 series). Performance verified via electrical stress setup simulating clinical out-of-range conditions; results confirmed the patient lead modification prevents/recovers from failure and maintains ICP drift within specifications over 30 days.
Technological Characteristics
Solid-state sensor interface; 7-inch color touch screen; internal rechargeable battery. Connectivity: USB for data streaming/download, patient monitor interface cable. Modification: Y-connection extension cable with electrically isolated patient lead (pinch connector for ECG electrodes). Biocompatibility per ISO 10993. Electrical safety per IEC 60601-1, 60601-1-2, 60601-1-8.
Indications for Use
Indicated for patients in ICU or OR requiring intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring via solid-state sensor in parenchymal tissue or external ventricular drainage catheter.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
An intracranial pressure monitoring device is a device used for short-term monitoring and recording of intracranial pressures and pressure trends. The device includes the transducer, monitor, and interconnecting hardware.
Predicate Devices
CereLink ICP Monitor and CereLink ICP Extension Cable (K210993)
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}------------------------------------------------
February 4, 2024
Image /page/0/Picture/1 description: The image contains the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). On the left is the Department of Health & Human Services logo. To the right of that is the FDA logo, which is a blue square with the letters "FDA" in white. To the right of the blue square is the text "U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION" in blue.
Integra LifeSciences Production Corporation Kali Sacco Manager, Regulatory Affairs 11 Cabot Boulevard Mansfield, Massachusetts 02048
#### Re: K232890
Trade/Device Name: CereLink ICP Monitor (826820), CereLink ICP Extension Cable (826845) Regulation Number: 21 CFR 882.1620 Regulation Name: Intracranial Pressure Monitoring Device Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: GWM Dated: January 5, 2024 Received: January 5, 2024
#### Dear Kali Sacco:
We have reviewed your section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database available at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Additional information about changes that may require a new premarket notification are provided in the FDA guidance documents entitled "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99812/download) and "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Software Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99785/download).
{1}------------------------------------------------
2
Your device is also subject to, among other requirements, the Quality System (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820), which includes, but is not limited to, 21 CFR 820.30, Design controls; 21 CFR 820.90, Nonconforming product; and 21 CFR 820.100, Corrective and preventive action. Please note that regardless of whether a change requires premarket review, the QS regulation requires device manufacturers to review and approve changes to device design and production (21 CFR 820.30 and 21 CFR 820.70) and document changes and approvals in the device master record (21 CFR 820.181).
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR Part 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reportingcombination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR Parts 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reportingmdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about mediation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advice-comprehensive-regulatoryassistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
Jay R. Gupta -S
Jay Gupta Assistant Director DHT5A: Division of Neurosurgical, Neurointerventional and Neurodiagnostic Devices OHT5: Office of Neurological and Physical Medicine Devices Office of Product Evaluation and Quality Center for Devices and Radiological Health
{2}------------------------------------------------
Enclosure
{3}------------------------------------------------
# Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K232890
Device Name CereLink ICP Monitor (826820); CereLink ICP Extension Cable (826845)
#### Indications for Use (Describe)
The ICP Monitor is intended for use as an interface between compatible strain gauge type pressure transducers and standard physiological pressure monitoring systems. The ICP Monitor is also intended for use as an independent pressure monitor for displaying the mean, systolic and diastolic values of a physiologic pressure waveform in the absence of an external patient monitor. The CereLink ICP Extension cable is intended for use as a connecting cable between the ICP input channel of the CereLink ICP Monitor and a CereLink ICP Sensor.
| Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable) | |
|---------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------|
| <div> Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) </div> | <div> Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C) </div> |
#### CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
#### *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{4}------------------------------------------------
## 510(k) Summary
A summary of 510(k) safety and effectiveness information in accordance with the requirements of 21 CFR 807.92.
| 807.92(a) (1) Submitter Information | |
|-------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Name and Address | Integra LifeSciences Production Corporation<br>11 Cabot Boulevard<br>Mansfield, MA 02048 |
| Telephone number | (680) 910-4999 |
| Primary Contact | Kali Sacco |
| Date Summary Prepared | January 31, 2024 |
| 807.92(a) (2) Name of Device | |
| Trade or Proprietary Name | CereLink® ICP Monitor (826820) and CereLink ICP<br>Extension Cable (826845) |
| Common Name | Intracranial Pressure Monitoring System |
| Classification Name | Device, Monitoring, Intracranial Pressure (21 CFR 882.1620) |
| Device Class | II |
| Product Code | GWM |
| 807.92(a) (3) Predicate Information | |
| Predicate Device | CereLink ICP Monitor and CereLink ICP Extension Cable<br>K210993<br>Product Code: GWM |
| 807.92(a) (4) Device Description | |
The CereLink ICP Monitor is indicated for use in the ICU or Operating Room (OR) environment for monitoring intracranial pressure (ICP) via a solid-state sensor placed directly in parenchymal tissue or integrated into an external ventricular drainage catheter placed in the ventricle. In addition to monitoring ICP and activating alarms when the intracranial pressure is outside user-set limits, the device performs these functions:
{5}------------------------------------------------
- . Displays ICP Waveform
- . Displays Mean ICP numeric
- . Displays the historic mean pressure as a trend
- . Displays trend statistics (Pressure Time Dosage (PTD), time above threshold, boxplot, histogram)
- . Stores 14-days' worth of mean ICP values
- . Stores 24 hours of pressure waveform
- . Can capture and store screen-shots
- . Can download various data to a USB device for printing or analysis
- . Real-time data streaming of mean ICP and waveform via USB connection
- Connect to external patient monitor
The CereLink ICP Monitor can be transported with the hospital to continuously record data. The monitor includes a 7" color touch screen that is compatible with the use of gloves. The monitor is provided to the user with a CereLink ICP Extension Cable, external power supply, and comes equipped with an internal rechargeable battery. The monitor has one output channel to transfer physiological data to a compatible Patient Monitor, as well as one input channel to receive ICP readings from the implanted CereLink ICP sensor. The implanted sensor is connected to the CereLink ICP Monitor by way of the CereLink ICP Extension Cable; the CereLink ICP Monitor connects to compatible patient monitors through the patient monitor interface cables.
### 807.92(a) (5) Indications for Use
The CereLink ICP Monitor is intended for use as an interface between compatible strain gauge type pressure transducers and standard physiological intracranial pressure monitoring systems. The CereLink ICP Monitor is also intended for use as an independent intracranial pressure monitor for displaying the mean, systolic and diastolic values of a physiologic pressure waveform in the absence of an external patient monitor. The CereLink ICP Extension cable is intended for use as a connecting cable between the ICP input channel of the CereLink ICP Monitor and a CereLink ICP Sensor.
{6}------------------------------------------------
## 807.92(a) (6) Technological Characteristics Compared to Predicate
The CereLink ICP Monitor is identical to the predicate CereLink ICP Monitor with the identical intended use, indications for use, clinical utility, design, features, user interface and fundamental scientific technology.
The CereLink ICP Extension Cable has the same intended use, indications for use, clinical utility, and fundamental scientific technology as the predicate CereLink ICP Monitor and CereLink ICP Extension Cable. In comparison to the predicate, the proposed CereLink ICP Monitor and CereLink ICP Extension Cable include the following modifications:
CereLink ICP Extension Cable – Addition of Patient Lead. The addition of the electrically isolated patient lead is to provide electrical equilibrium between the patient and CereLink system's isolated circuits, preventing a "DC Negative Offset".
- A Y-connection will be added near the distal end of the CereLink ICP Extension Cable. ●
- One leg of the Y-connection will be the existing (unmodified) distal end of the cable that . connects to the ICP sensor. The other leg of the Y-connection will add an electrically isolated patient lead with a pinch connector that is compatible with standard ECG electrodes
CereLink ICP Monitor and CereLink ICP Extension Cable Instructions for Use - Labelling changes are the result of the CereLink ICP Extension Cable changes proposed in this submission
- . Describe how to use the patient lead with a pinch connector,
- Add a precaution regarding the patient lead with pinch connector's impact on reliable performance of the ICP sensor,
- . Include additional details for cable and cord management, and
- Add troubleshooting steps addressing out of range failure and usage of the patient lead .
CereLink ICP Monitor Package labels - Package label was updated to identify all contents within the package.
CereLink ICP Monitor and CereLink ICP Extension Cable package configuration - CereLink ICP Extension Cable will be packaged separately from the CereLink ICP Monitor unit box. It will be
{7}------------------------------------------------
provided to the customer within the same shipping container as the CereLink Monitor for customer convenience.
#### 807.92(b) 1-2: Summary of Nonclinical and Clinical Testing Performed
The following performance testing has been conducted in support of the substantial equivalence determination. All testing was performed on production equivalent devices. Results of verification and validation testing conducted on the CereLink ICP Monitor and CereLink ICP Extension Cable demonstrate that the device performs as designed, is suitable for its intended use and is substantially equivalent to the predicate device.
To reproduce the conditions that lead to the CereLink out-of-range errors, an in-vitro platform was developed and has been named the "electrical stress setup." The electrical stress setup simulates the external factors and elements that leads the CereLink system into the Out-of-Range state. The external factors are electrical and chemical in nature, and all must be present at a sufficient level to reproduce the failure.
The Electrical Stress Setup can consistently reproduce the Out-of-Range failures at a significantly higher rate than the failures seen in the clinical setting, allowing the setup to be used as part of design verification to demonstrate the reliability and effectiveness of the CereLink ICP Extension Cable design change. The Electrical Stress Setup was used as part of ICP Drift Test and Out of Range Failure Test.
In the ICP Drift Test, the CereLink Systems were exposed to the Electrical Stress Setup, with the ICP Extension Cable Patient Lead correctly connected. During 30 days of continuous testing, the ICP drift was found to meet the specification.
In the Out-of-Range Test, the CereLink Systems were exposed to the Electrical Stress Setup, with the ICP Extension Cable Patient Lead connected incorrectly. As expected, all CereLink Systems were induced in to the out-of-range failure within the specified time. The ICP Extension Cable Patient Lead was then connected correctly, and the test demonstrated that all CereLink Systems recovered from the failure within the specified amount of time.
{8}------------------------------------------------
Based on the testing performed as summarized, the CereLink ICP Monitor with the proposed changes to the CereLink ICP Extension Cable does not raise new questions of safety or effectiveness and supports substantial equivalence to the predicate device.
| Performance Bench Test Results | |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------|------------|
| Test | Conclusion |
| Mechanical Tests | Pass |
| Electrical Testing (Impedance Measurement) | Pass |
| Out of Range Failure Test<br>*Utilized the electrical stress setup | Pass |
| 30 Day ICP Drift Test<br>*Utilized the electrical stress setup | Pass |
| Mean Time Between Failure Calculation Test | Pass |
| Simulated Environment Validation Test (13 days) | Pass |
| Label Verification Test | Pass |
| Drawing Verification Test | Pass |
| Summative Usability Report | Pass |
| Biocompatibility Testing Results | |
|----------------------------------|------------|
| Test | Conclusion |
| ISO 10993-5:2009 | Pass |
| ISO 10993-10:2021 | Pass |
| ISO 10993-23:2021 | Pass |
| Electrical Safety and Electromagnetic Compatibility Test Results | | |
|------------------------------------------------------------------|------------|--|
| Test | Conclusion | |
| IEC 60601-1: 2005+AMD1:2012+AMD2:2020 | Pass | |
| IEC 60601-1-6: 2010+AMD1:2013+AMD2:2020 | Pass | |
| IEC 60601-1-8:2006+AMD1:2012+AMD2:2020 | Pass | |
| IEC 60601-1-2:2014+AMD1:2020 | Pass | |
| IEC 62366-1:2015+AMD1:2020 | Pass | |
## Animal Studies
No animal studies were required. Verification and validation of the subject devices was achieved
based on the comparison to the predicate devices and from the results of the bench,
biocompatibility, electrical safety, and electromagnetic compatibility testing.
{9}------------------------------------------------
## Clinical Studies
No clinical studies were required. Verification and validation of the subject devices was achieved
based on the comparison to the predicate device and from the results of the bench,
biocompatibility, electrical safety, and electromagnetic compatibility testing.
#### 807.92(b) (3) Conclusion
Based upon the intended use, design, operating principle, scientific technology and comparison to the predicate device, and testing performed, it is concluded that the proposed modifications to the CereLink ICP Monitor and CereLink ICP Extension Cable do not raise any new questions of safety and effectiveness, and are therefore, substantially equivalent to the predicate, CereLink ICP Monitor and CereLink ICP Extension Cable.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.