The ALB Luz Viral Transport Media is intended for the collection and transport of upper respiratory clinical specimens containing Influenza A, Influenza B, Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV), and Rhinovirus from the collection site to the testing laboratory. The Viral Transport Media is a culture-based media that is intended to be used with standard diagnostic/identification techniques that utilize stable recoverable infectious viral particles.
Device Story
Non-propagating transport device; preserves upper respiratory samples for viral recovery. Consists of 3 mL culture-based media in polymer screw-cap tube. Used by clinicians at collection site; samples transported to laboratory. Maintains cellular integrity/viral viability for up to 48 hours at 2-8°C or 20-25°C. Laboratory personnel use standard diagnostic/identification techniques on recovered viral particles. Benefits patient by ensuring sample stability during transit, facilitating accurate diagnostic testing.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. Viral recovery studies performed using plaque-forming assays for Influenza A, RSV, and Rhinovirus. Samples stored at 2-8°C and 20-25°C for 0, 24, and 48 hours. Results showed viral recovery within acceptable limits (±90% or 1 log change). Physical and pH stability validated over 18-month real-time aging study.
Technological Characteristics
Non-sterile, single-use transport media. Ingredients: HBSS, Amphotericin B, Colistin sulfate, HEPES buffer, Phenol red, BSA fraction V, Dextrose, Penicillin G potassium, Gelatin powder. pH 7.4±0.2. 3mL volume in plastic screw-cap tube. Filtered via 0.22 µm membrane. Storage 2-35°C.
Indications for Use
Indicated for collection and transport of upper respiratory clinical specimens containing Influenza A, Influenza B, Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV), and Rhinovirus from collection site to testing laboratory for use with standard diagnostic techniques.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A transport culture medium is a device that consists of a semisolid, usually non-nutrient, medium that maintains the viability of suspected pathogens contained in patient specimens while in transit from the specimen collection area to the laboratory. The device aids in the diagnosis of disease caused by pathogenic microorganisms and also provides epidemiological information on these diseases.
Predicate Devices
iClean Viral Transport System (VTM-RT kit) (K212856)
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}
FDA
U.S. FOOD & DRUG
ADMINISTRATION
# 510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION DECISION SUMMARY
ASSAY ONLY
## I Background Information:
A 510(k) Number
K232454
B Applicant
ALB Luz
C Proprietary and Established Names
Viral Transport Media (VTM)
D Regulatory Information
| Product Code(s) | Classification | Regulation Section | Panel |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| JSM | Class I, reserved | 21 CFR 866.2390 - Transport Culture Medium | MI - Microbiology |
## II Submission/Device Overview:
A Purpose for Submission:
To obtain substantial equivalence determination for ALB LUZ Viral Transport Media – VTM for the collection and transport of viral specimens for standard diagnostic/identification technique.
B Measurand:
Not applicable
C Type of Test:
Non-propagating Transport Device with culture medium
## III Intended Use/Indications for Use:
A Intended Use(s):
See Indications for Use below.
Food and Drug Administration
10903 New Hampshire Avenue
Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
www.fda.gov
{1}
K232454 - Page 2 of 8
## B Indication(s) for Use:
The ALB Luz Viral Transport Media is intended for the collection and transport of upper respiratory clinical specimens containing Influenza A, Influenza B, Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV), and Rhinovirus from the collection site to the testing laboratory. The Viral Transport Media is a culture-based media that is intended to be used with standard diagnostic/identification techniques that utilize stable recoverable infectious viral particles.
## C Special Conditions for Use Statement(s):
Rx - For Prescription Use Only
The Viral Transport Media is intended to be used with Rayon Tip Swab listed on FDA by the manufacturer HENSO MEDICAL (HANGZHOU) CO., LTD. The use of medium, tubes, or swabs from any other source may compromise performance.
Condition, timing, and volume of specimen collected for culture are significant variables in obtaining reliable culture results.
The Viral Transport Medium is not intended for freezing and thawing.
The medium has been evaluated for its ability to transport various respiratory viruses, which include, Influenza A, Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV), and Rhinovirus, for viral recovery. Results obtained largely depend on proper and adequate specimen collection as well as the promptness with which the specimens are transported to the laboratory and analyzed.
## D Special Instrument Requirements:
## IV Device/System Characteristics:
### A Device Description:
The Viral Transport Medium (VTM) is a non-propagating transport device composed of a culture-based media without swabs. The VTM is designed to preserve upper respiratory samples collected from a patient by placing the sample into the polymer tube containing 3 mL of media. The sample and media are then secured with a leak-proof screwcap for transportation.
The VTM maintains cellular integrity and preservation of viruses when properly stored. Prior to use, vials should be stored at 2°C to 35°C. After specimen collection, the transport tube containing the specimen can be stored for up to 48 hours at either 2-8°C or 20-25°C, for transportation to the laboratory and storage. The medium has been evaluated for storage of the following respiratory viruses, Influenza A, Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV), and Rhinovirus, for viral recovery.
### B Principle of Operation:
The Viral Transport Media - VTM has a formulation that preserves viral viability. The VTM contains the following ingredients.
- Hank's balanced salt solution (HBSS)
- Amphotericin B
- Colistin sulfate
- HEPES buffer
- Phenol red
{2}
Bovine serum albumin fraction V (BSA)
Dextrose
Penicillin G potassium
Gelatin powder
Hank's Balanced Salt Solution (HBSS) is further enriched with proteins and sugars for stabilization, and antimicrobial agents to inhibit the overgrowth of bacteria, fungi, and yeasts. A buffer system to maintain neutral pH and a pH indicator. Polymer screw-cap top tubes are filled with 3mL of VTM.
V Substantial Equivalence Information:
A Predicate Device Name(s):
iClean Viral Tranport System
B Predicate 510(k) Number(s):
K212856
C Comparison with Predicate(s):
| Device & Predicate Device(s): | Device: K232454 | Predicate: K212856 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Device Trade Name | Viral Transport Media - VTM | iClean Viral Transport System (VTM-RT kit) |
| Product Code and Classification | JSM, Class I | JSM, Class I |
| General Device Characteristic Similarities | | |
| Intended Use/Indications For Use | The ALB Luz Viral Transport Media is intended for the collection and transport of upper respiratory clinical specimens containing Influenza A, Influenza B, Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV), and Rhinovirus from the collection site to the testing laboratory. The Viral Transport Media is a culture-based media that is intended to be used with standard diagnostic/identification techniques that utilize stable recoverable infectious viral particles. | iClean Viral Transport System (VTM-RT) is intended for the collection and transport of clinical specimens containing respiratory viruses, Chlamydiae, or Mycoplasma hominis from the collection site to the testing laboratory. The collection system is a culture-based media that is intended to be used with standard laboratory examination, culture or with other assays that utilize stable recoverable infectious viral particles or bacteria. |
| Validation | Culture Media | Culture Media |
K232454 - Page 3 of 8
{3}
| Tube Material | Plastic Screw-Cap Tube | Plastic Screw-Cap Tube |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Single Use Device | Yes | Yes |
| General Device Characteristic Differences | | |
| Shelf Life | 18 months | 12 months |
| Storage Temperature | 2 to 35°C | 20 to 25°C |
| pH | 7.4±0.2 | 7.4±0.4 |
| Supported Strains | Influenza A,
Influenza B,
Respiratory
Syncytial Virus (RSV),
Rhinovirus | Adenovirus,
Cytomegalovirus,
Echovirus Type 30,
Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1,
Herpes Simplex Virus Type 2,
Influenza A, Parainfluenza 3,
Respiratory Syncytial Virus,
Chlamydia pneumoniae,
Chlamydia trachomatis,
Mycoplasma hominis |
| List of Ingredients | Hank’s balanced salt solution (HBSS)
Amphotericin B
Colistin sulfate
HEPES buffer
Phenol red
Bovine serum albumin fraction V (BSA)
Dextrose
Penicillin G potassium
Gelatin powder | Hank’s balanced salt solution (HBSS)
Amphotericin B
Colistin
HEPES buffer
Phenol red
Bovine Serum Albumin (BSA)
Gentamicin sulfate
L-Glutamic acid |
VI Standards/Guidance Documents Referenced:
VII Performance Characteristics (if/when applicable):
A Analytical Performance:
1. Precision/Reproducibility:
Not applicable.
K232454 - Page 4 of 8
{4}
2. Linearity:
Not applicable.
3. Analytical Specificity/Interference:
Not applicable.
4. Assay Reportable Range:
Not applicable.
5. Traceability, Stability, Expected Values (Controls, Calibrators, or Methods):
A. Shelf-Life:
The shelf-life for the ALB LUZ Viral Transport Media was established to be 18 months from the date of manufacture when stored in a clean, dry, ventilated environment at 2 - 35°C. The shelf-life study was conducted by using real-time aging performance test for 18 months. In this study, the shelf life was evaluated for physical stability of appearance and volume, and pH stability during the period of storage.
i. Physical Stability: To evaluate physical stability, any changes in appearance in color, turbidity and volume of the ALB LUZ Viral Transport Media were physically or visually examined at storage time points T = 0, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, and 18 months. Three lots were tested for physical stability at storage conditions of 2°C and 35°C. At each time point, appearance of the product was inspected visually which appeared clear with slight precipitation and maintained an orange-pink color (i.e., no changes in color) and no changes in liquid media volume. All results were acceptable and support the claim that the ALB LUZ Viral Transport Media is physically or visually stable for 18 months.
ii. pH Stability: To evaluate product stability, the pH of the ALB LUZ Viral Transport Media was tested at storage time points T = 0, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, and 18 months. Three lots were tested for pH stability at storage condition of 2°C and 35°C. At each time point, the pH was measured by immersing the pH meter electrode into each ALB LUZ Viral Transport Media by adjusting the temperature to 25°C. For all the tubes tested, the pH measurement was within the acceptable pH range of 7.2 to 7.6. All results were acceptable and support the claim for pH stability of the ALB LUZ Viral Transport Media for 18 months.
The results for physical stability and pH stability collectively support the 18-month stability claim for the ALB LUZ Viral Transport Media.
B. Sterilization:
The ALB LUZ Viral Transport Media is not claimed to be sterile nor is it intended to be sterilized by the end user. To reduce the contamination, the transport media is filtered using a 0.22 µm sterile filter membrane and then 3 mL aliquot is aseptically transferred into individual sterile conical screw-capped tubes. A microbial contamination check was conducted by incubating the tubes for 48 hours at 35°C ± 2°C followed by transferring 100
K232454 - Page 5 of 8
{5}
$\mu \mathrm{L}$ of transport media into BHI media and incubating for 24 hours at $35^{\circ} \mathrm{C} \pm 2^{\circ} \mathrm{C}$ . No growth was observed on any of the tested media.
# 6. Detection Limit:
# Performance Testing - Viral Recovery Studies:
Performance of ALB LUZ Viral Transport Media was evaluated by Culture-Based Recovery Studies for viral test strains using plaque forming assay. The viral strains and cell lines used for the plaque forming assay are shown in the Table 1.
Table 1. Viral strains and Cell Lines used for the plaque forming assay.
| Virus Strains | Cell Lines |
| --- | --- |
| Influenza A virus H1N1 (ATCC VR-1520) | MDCK (ATCC CCL-34) |
| Human respiratory syncytial virus (ATCC VR-1540) | MRC-5 (Instituto Adolfo Lutz CCIAL 023) |
| Human rhinovirus (ATCC VR-1178) | MRC-5 (Instituto Adolfo Lutz CCIAL 023) |
To perform the recovery assay, virus stock was 10-fold serially diluted into pooled negative clinical nasal matrix. Each sample dilution was transferred into ALB LUZ Viral Transport Media by using Rayon Tip Swab and stored at $2 - 8^{\circ}\mathrm{C}$ and $20 - 25^{\circ}\mathrm{C}$ for 0, 24 and 48 hours respectively. Three lots of VTM with newly manufactured, mid-range lot and close to expiry lots were used to evaluate viral recovery. For tissue culture, MDCK (ATCC CCL-34) and MRC-5 (Instituto Adolfo Lutz CCIAL 023) were seeded in 24-well plates and grown to a confluent monolayer. To perform the plaque forming assay, the viral samples from ALB LUZ Viral Transport Media were serially diluted 10-fold and added to the monolayer in triplicate and allowed for virus adsorption by incubating the plates for 1 hour at $37^{\circ}\mathrm{C}$ . Semisolid medium containing DMEM, $1\%$ carboxymethyl cellulose, and $1\%$ penicillin/streptomycin antibiotics were added to each well and incubated at $37^{\circ}\mathrm{C}$ for 5-7 days. For counting the plaques developed, the cell fixation was performed with $10\%$ paraformaldehyde and the staining of cell monolayer was performed with $1\%$ crystal violet. Plaque-forming units were counted visually. The viral titer of each sample was recorded and calculated in plaque-forming units per mL (PFU/mL) and the results from the triplicates were provided as an average PFU/mL for 0, 24 and 48 hours. Results were considered acceptable if the average viral recovery demonstrates any percent changes within $\pm 90\%$ (i.e., 1 log change).
The results are presented in the Table 2 and Table 3 below. Any reduction in the viral count in the timepoints was shown as percent changes and -ve indicates reduction.
Table 2. Viral Recovery for specimen storage at ${2 - 8}^{ \circ }\mathrm{C}$ .
| Viral Strain Tested | Lots | Average recovery in PFU/mL | | | Percent changes (0 to 24 hrs.) * | Percent changes (0 to 48 hrs.) * |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | 0 hr. | 24 hrs. | 48 hrs. | | |
| Influenza A | 113364 | 5.56E+04 | 5.04E+04 | 3.60E+04 | -9% | -35% |
| | 111777 | 5.76E+04 | 5.40E+04 | 3.67E+04 | -6% | -36% |
| | 111307 | 4.97E+04 | 4.97E+04 | 3.07E+04 | 0% | -38% |
| Respiratory | 113364 | 2.00E+06 | 1.78E+06 | 1.11E+06 | -11% | -45% |
K232454 - Page 6 of 8
{6}
Table 3. Viral Recovery for specimen storage at 20-25°C.
| Viral Strain Tested | Lots | Average recovery in PFU/mL | | | Percent changes (0 to 24 hrs.) * | Percent changes (0 to 48 hrs.) * |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | 0 hr. | 24 hrs. | 48 hrs. | | |
| Influenza A | 113364 | 5.08E+04 | 4.70E+04 | 3.39E+04 | -7% | -33% |
| | 111777 | 4.87E+04 | 4.04E+04 | 2.98E+04 | -17% | -39% |
| | 111307 | 4.73E+04 | 3.81E+04 | 2.97E+04 | -20% | -37% |
| Respiratory Syncytial Virus | 113364 | 2.22E+06 | 2.11E+06 | 1.33E+06 | -5% | -40% |
| | 111777 | 1.56E+06 | 1.33E+06 | 8.89E+05 | -15% | -43% |
| | 111307 | 1.55E+06 | 1.56E+06 | 9.89E+05 | 0% | -36% |
| Rhinovirus | 113364 | 1.89E+06 | 1.55E+06 | 1.33E+06 | -18% | -29% |
| | 111777 | 2.67E+06 | 2.11E+06 | 1.44E+06 | -21% | -46% |
| | 111307 | 2.11E+06 | 2.11E+06 | 1.22E+06 | 0% | -42% |
* -ve indicates reduction
Conclusion: The ALB LUZ Viral Transport Media demonstrated the recovery of tested viruses (Influenza A, Respiratory Syncytial Virus, and Rhinovirus), in all replicates at tested incubation times and storage conditions. All the results appear acceptable and support specimen transport for up to 48 hours at 2-8°C or 20-25°C.
7. Assay Cut-Off:
Not Applicable.
B Comparison Studies:
1. Method Comparison with Predicate Device:
Not Applicable.
2. Matrix Comparison:
Not Applicable.
C Clinical Studies:
1. Clinical Sensitivity:
Not Applicable.
K232454 - Page 7 of 8
{7}
2. Clinical Specificity:
Not Applicable.
3. Other Clinical Supportive Data (When 1. and 2. Are Not Applicable):
Not Applicable.
D. Clinical Cut-Off:
Not Applicable.
E. Expected Values/Reference Range:
Not Applicable.
VIII. Proposed Labeling:
The labeling supports the finding of substantial equivalence for this device.
IX. Conclusion:
The submitted information in this premarket notification is complete and supports a substantial equivalence decision.
K232454 - Page 8 of 8
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.