General-purpose solid-state bipolar generator used to supply High Frequency currents via electrosurgical handpieces for the function of cutting or coagulating soft body tissues where a wide range of tissue types, patient conditions, and load impedances are encountered.
Device Story
Polaris Bipolar Electrosurgical Generator System is a solid-state electrosurgical unit (ESU) for cutting/coagulating soft tissue. System includes main generator console, footswitch, irrigation module, and light source module. Surgeon operates device via footswitch to deliver RF energy to bipolar handpieces. Irrigation module clears debris; light source module provides surgical site illumination. Generator features capacitive touch screen, dual waveform generation, and diagnostic logging. Used in clinical settings by surgeons/physicians. Output energy affects tissue via thermal coagulation/cutting. Benefits include precise tissue management and integrated visualization/irrigation support.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. Comparative tissue coagulation study (bovine liver, kidney, muscle) demonstrated equivalent coagulation effects and thermal profiles (±20% tolerance) between subject and predicate. Waveform testing confirmed output consistency within 20% variation. Electrical safety and EMC testing performed per IEC 60601-1-2, IEC 60601-2-2, and related standards. Human factors testing with surgeons, PAs, nurses, and technicians confirmed safe operation across 19 critical tasks with no hazardous use errors.
Technological Characteristics
Solid-state bipolar electrosurgical generator. Materials: Anodized aluminum housing. Energy: RF current (465.1 kHz). Output: 0-80W (Cut), 0-60W (Coag). Connectivity: Proprietary module ports for irrigation and light source. Interface: Capacitive touch screen. Software: Proprietary firmware. Sterilization: Not applicable (device is a console). Standards: IEC 60601-1-2, IEC 60601-1-6, IEC 60601-2-2, IEC 62471, CISPR 11.
Indications for Use
Indicated for cutting or coagulating soft body tissues in patients requiring electrosurgical intervention, where a wide range of tissue types, patient conditions, and load impedances are encountered.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
An electrosurgical cutting and coagulation device and accessories is a device intended to remove tissue and control bleeding by use of high-frequency electrical current.
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA). The logo consists of two parts: a symbol on the left and the FDA name on the right. The symbol is a stylized representation of a human figure, while the FDA name is written in blue and includes the words "U.S. Food & Drug Administration".
August 25, 2023
Kirwan Surgical Products LLC Mr. Matthew Prario Regulatory Affairs Manager 180 Enterprise Drive Marshfield, Massachusetts 02050
Re: K231872
Trade/Device Name: Polaris Bipolar Electrosurgical Generator System
Regulation Number: 21 CFR 878.4400 Regulation Name: Electrosurgical cutting and coagulation device and accessories Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: GEI Dated: June 23, 2023 Received: June 26, 2023
Dear Mr. Prario:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database located at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal
{1}------------------------------------------------
statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reportingcombination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reportingmdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about medical devices and radiation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advice-comprehensive-regulatoryassistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
Francisco Delgado -S 2023.08.25 09:31:53 -04'00'
for Long Chen, Ph.D. Assistant Director DHT4A: Division of General Surgery Devices OHT4: Office of Surgical and Infection Control Devices Office of Product Evaluation and Ouality Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
#### DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Food and Drug Administration
# Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K231872
Device Name
Polaris Bipolar Electrosurgical Generator System
Indications for Use (Describe)
General-purpose solid-state bipolar generator used to supply High Frequency currents via electrosurgical handpieces for the function of cutting or coagulating soft body tissues where a wide range of tissue types, patient conditions, and load impedances are encountered.
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
> Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
#### CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
#### *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
# K231872 510(k) Summary Polaris™ Bipolar Electrosurgical Generator System
## A. Sponsor
Kirwan Surgical Products LLC 180 Enterprise Drive Marshfield, MA 02050
#### B. Contact
Mr. Matthew R. Prario Regulatory Affairs Manager Phone: 339-832-1743 Email: mprario@ksp.com
### C. Device Name
Trade Name: Polaris Bipolar Electrosurgical Generator System Common/Usual Name: Electrical Surgical Unit (ESU) / Bipolar Electrosurgical Generator Classification Name: Electrosurgical Cutting and Coagulation Device and Accessories Product Code: GEI - 21 CFR §878.4400 D. Predicate Device(s) Trade Name: Aura 70-Watt Bipolar Electrosurgical Generator Common/Usual Name: Electrical Surgical Unit (ESU) / Bipolar Electrosurgical Generator Classification Name: Electrosurgical cutting and coagulation device and accessories Product Code: GEI Predicate 510(k) K052203 (substantial equivalence date October 20, 2005) Reference 510 (k)s Karl Storz (K123956)
# E. Device Description
The proposed Polaris™ Bipolar Electrosurgical Generator System includes a Generator as the main console, a Footswitch, an Irrigation Module, and a Light Source Module. The Generator contains a single bipolar channel for delivery with an electrode applying the energy to the patient. The Irrigation Module connects to tubing that allows fluid to be delivered to the surgical site to allow for clearing of debris from the surgical field. The Light Source Module connects to an optical fiber that supplies illumination to the surgical site to assist with surgeon visualization. The Footswitch is used to control the delivery of RF energy to the patient with one switch for Coagulate and one for Cut power. The Generator includes 4
{4}------------------------------------------------
Module ports for controlling and powering the Modules each have built in cords to connect to these ports on the Generator. The Modules mount to the Generator using a locking rail system so that they will not accidentally come loose during use. The Irrigation Module includes an IV pole that attaches to the Generator to support a saline bag that supplies the irrigation fluid.
# F. Indications for Use
The proposed Polaris™ Bipolar Electrosurgical Generator has the following Indications for Use:
- The Polaris™ Bipolar Electrosurgical Generator is a general-purpose solid-state bipolar o generator used to supply High Frequency currents via electrosurgical handpieces for the function of cutting or coagulating soft body tissues where a wide range of tissue types, patient conditions, and load impedances are encountered.
# G. Summary of Similarities and Differences in Technological Characteristics and Performance
The proposed Polaris™ Bipolar Electrosurgical Generator is substantially equivalent to the Aura 70-watt Bipolar Electrosurgical Generator. When compared to the proposed Polaris™ Bipolar Electrosurgical Generator have similar materials, design, components, fundamental technology, and operating principles and the same indications for use. The modifications from the predicate device include: power and control connections for modules, capacitive touch screen over a resistive touch screen, dual waveform generation, expanded User Interface, and downloadable system diagnostic logs. These similarities and differences are illustrated in the following table.
| Comparison of Proposed Polaris™ Bipolar Electrosurgical Generator<br>And Predicate Aura 70-Watt Bipolar Electrosurgical Generator | | |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Characteristic(s) | Proposed Device:<br>Polaris™ Bipolar Electrosurgical<br>Generator<br>(K231872) | Predicate Device:<br>Aura 70-watt Bipolar<br>Electrosurgical Generator<br>(K052203) |
| Indications for Use | General-purpose solid-state bipolar<br>generator used to supply High<br>Frequency currents via<br>electrosurgical handpieces for the<br>function of cutting or coagulating<br>soft body tissues where a wide<br>range of tissue types, patient<br>conditions, and load impedances<br>are encountered. | General-purpose solid-state bipolar<br>generator to supply RF signal to<br>electrosurgical handpieces used on<br>soft body tissue where a wide range<br>of tissue types, patient conditions,<br>and load impedances are<br>encountered. Where applicable a<br>peristatic irrigation pump controls<br>flow rate individually or<br>simultaneously while coagulating. |
| Hardware | | |
| Output | Bipolar | Bipolar |
| Number of Outputs | One | One |
| Physical Dimensions (HxWxD)<br>(cm) | 38.1 x 19.2 x 38.4 | 17.8 x 29.2 x 31.8 |
| Weight in lbs. | 14.64 | 15 |
| Maximum Output Voltage (V rms) | 160 | 200 |
| Rated Load (ohms) | 150 | 200 |
| Frequency Output Range (kHz) | 465.1 | 512 |
| Power Outage Range (W) | 0-80 (CUT Waveform)<br>0-60 (COAG Waveform) | 0-70 |
| Housing Material | Anodized aluminum, Teal | Anodized Aluminum, Grey |
| Comparison of Proposed Polaris™ Bipolar Electrosurgical Generator<br>And Predicate Aura 70-Watt Bipolar Electrosurgical Generator | | |
| Characteristic(s) | Proposed Device:<br>Polaris™ Bipolar Electrosurgical<br>Generator<br>(K231872) | Predicate Device:<br>Aura 70-watt Bipolar<br>Electrosurgical Generator<br>(K052203) |
| Indications for Use | General-purpose solid-state bipolar<br>generator used to supply High<br>Frequency currents via<br>electrosurgical handpieces for the<br>function of cutting or coagulating<br>soft body tissues where a wide<br>range of tissue types, patient<br>conditions, and load impedances<br>are encountered. | General-purpose solid-state bipolar<br>generator to supply RF signal to<br>electrosurgical handpieces used on<br>soft body tissue where a wide range<br>of tissue types, patient conditions,<br>and load impedances are<br>encountered. Where applicable a<br>peristatic irrigation pump controls<br>flow rate individually or<br>simultaneously while coagulating. |
| Electrical Input | 100-240Vrms, 50/60Hz | 90-240VAC, 50/60Hz |
| Irrigating Pump | Polaris Irrigation Module | Maxon 40mm Peristaltic Pump |
| Max Irrigation Flow Rate (mL/min) | 25 | 50 |
| Light Source | Polaris Light Source Module | Not Present |
| Screen | Capacitive Touch Screen | Kyocera Resistive Touch Screen |
| Software/UI | | |
| CPU Software | Proprietary to RBC Medical<br>Innovations | Merisc Custom |
| Control Board Software | Proprietary to RBC Medical<br>Innovations | Supplied by IBBAB |
| Amplifier Software | Proprietary to RBC Medical<br>Innovations | Proprietary to IBBAB |
| Error History | Yes | Not present |
| Service Mode | Yes | Not present |
| Downloadable System Logs | Yes | Not present |
| Output time Tracking | Yes | Yes |
| Available Output Units | Max-Watts/ESU | Watts/ESU |
| Accessories | | |
| Foot Pedal | Dual Simple Switches | Simple Switch |
| Bipolar Surgical Tools | Yes | Yes |
| Miscellaneous | | |
| Patient Contact | No | No |
| Sterilization Method | Not Applicable | Not Applicable |
| Preventative Maintenance | Yearly Function Checks | Yearly Function Checks |
| Changing b/w Watts and ESU | In Settings Menu via UX | Internal Hardware Jumper |
{5}------------------------------------------------
{6}------------------------------------------------
# H. Performance Data
## Thermal Effects on Tissue
In accordance with the FDA Guidance on 510(k) Submissions for Electrosurgical Devices for General Surgery, a comparative tissue coagulation was performed between the proposed device and the predicate (Engineering Report E070723-1).
Test Scope: The testing was performed using one Aura Bipolar Electrosurgical Generator and one Polaris Bipolar Electrosurgical Generator. Both units were tested with the same bipolar forceps sample part on the same tissue samples and were operated at the same output settings.
3 Types of Sample Test Tissue (Boyine):
- Liver Tissue .
- -Kidney Tissue
- ﯾ Muscle Tissue
Acceptance Criteria: To be considered acceptable, the results of this testing will demonstrate that the coagulation sites of both generators are substantially equivalent when set to the same output settings. This includes the physical measurement of the coagulation site, as well as the relative temperature increase while bipolar output was active. All physical measurements and temperature changes should fit within an acceptable range utilizing a ± 20% tolerance.
Test Conclusion: Based on the results and rationale presented above, both devices were successful in achieving a similar, desired coagulation effect on similar tissue, and both heated tissue at similar rates to a similar peak temperature. It is the conclusion of this Engineering Report that the Polaris Bipolar Electrosurgical Generator (K231872) is substantially equivalent to its predicate, Aura Bipolar Generator (K052203), when operated by the intended user of the device.
#### Waveform Testing
In accordance with the FDA Guidance on 510(k) Submissions for Electrosurgical Devices for General Surgery, a comparative waveform test was performed between the proposed device and the predicate (Engineering Report E071123-1).
Test Scope: The evaluation and testing were performed on one production Aura 70W Bipolar Electrosurgical Generator, model number 28-2600, assembled using standard manufacturing procedures and one production Polaris Bipolar Electrosurgical Generator model number 29-1000, assembled using standard manufacturing procedures. Both systems were set to a 20-Watt output with a 100Ω load to establish frequency and voltage RMS differences.
Test Results: Capturing the absolute values from a sine wave of an RF generator may produce a 10% variation in value depending on how long the signal is maintained and where in the cvcle the data was extrapolated. The values presented in report E071123-1 were obtained as an average of the signal over a 3 second time period.
Test Conclusion: Although the values are slightly different, the outputs are well within the 20% output variation between like systems. Based on the results presented in report E071123-1, Kirwan Surgical
{7}------------------------------------------------
Products LLC determines that the output waveform of the Polaris Bipolar Electrosurgical Generator is substantially equivalent to the waveform produced by the predicate Aura 70W Bipolar Electrosurgical Generator, when they are operated with similar output settings.
# Electrical Safety & Electromagnetic Compatibility Tests
Electrical safety and electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) Electrical safety and EMC testing were conducted on the Polaris™ Bipolar Generator System, consisting of the main Polaris™ Bipolar Electrosurgical Generator, Dual Footswitch, Polaris™ Irrigation Module, and Polaris™ Light Source Module.
The system has passed the following tests and complies with the associated standards;
- Electrostatic Discharge Test (IEC 60601-1-2) -
- -Radiated Immunity Test (IEC 61000-4-3)
- = Electrical Fast Transient/Burst Test (IEC 61000-4-4)
- Surge Test (IEC 61000-4-5) -
- ារ Conducted Immunity Test (IEC 61000-4-6)
- -Power Frequency Magnetic Field Test (IEC 61000-4-8)
- -Voltage Dips & Interruptions Test (IEC 60601-1-2)
- = Radiated Emissions Test (CISPR 11 & FCC CFR 47, Part 15, subpart B:2017)
- -Conducted Emissions Test (CISPR 11 & FCC CFR 47, Part 15, subpart B:2017)
- Harmonic & Flicker Test (IEC 61000-3-2 & IEC 61000-3-3) .
- . Exposure to Radio Frequency Identification Readers Test (AIM 7351731)
- -Immunity to Known Sources of EMI Test (FDA Guidance - Immunity to exposure to known sources of EMI)
Electrical Safety Testing Clause by Clause Compliance to IEC 60601-1-6, IEC 60601-2-2, and IEC 62471
## Software Verification & Validation testing
Software Verification and Validation Testing Software verification testing were conducted and documentation was provided as recommended by FDA's Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff, "Guidance for the Content of Premarket Submissions for Software Contained in Medical Devices." The software for this device was considered as a "major" level of concern, since a failure or latent flaw in the software could directly result in serious injury or death to the patient or operator. All software verification & validation activities are outlined in the Kirwan Polaris Software Development Plan (document number 100-00068-004).
## Human Factors Testing
The purpose of the Polaris™ Bipolar Generator System Human Factors testing was to Evaluate if the User Interface enables all User Profiles to safely operate the Polaris System. Evaluate if the User Interface enables all User Profiles to effectively and efficiently operate the Polaris System. Identify and document any Abnormal Use's, unknown Use Errors, and difficult to complete tasks. Determine roots causes for all Use Errors and evaluate their Risk acceptability. The User Interface for the Polaris System was designed to be intuitive enough for a User to be able to setup and operate the system without need for KSP training or in-service of any kind.
{8}------------------------------------------------
The first user profile was to be populated by Surgeons & Surgical Physician Assistants, and the second was to be populated by Perioperative Nurses and Biomedical Equipment Technicians.
27 Tasks that were identified as functions necessary for a User to perform to effectively use all the capabilities of the Polaris System. All Users were able to fulfill these functions during testing. The few Users who did not score perfect on the final test were due to misunderstanding of the test instructions or due to other circumstances outside their control. There were no noted issues of user error during any of the final testing.
19 Critical Tasks that were identified to safely operate the Polaris system and avoid Hazardous situations with a Severity level of 3 or higher (a situation that can result in injury that require medical intervention or worse). All Users were able to perform the Critical Tasks, and there were no recorded instances of Use Error or Abnormal Use that would result in a Hazardous Situation with a severity level of 3.
In conclusion, users whose background is consistent with either of the utilized User Profiles will be able to operate the Polaris safely, effectively, and without the need for formal training.
## I. Conclusion
Based upon successful results of testing and responses to questions posed within FDA 's 510(k) Decision-Making Tree, the proposed device is determined to be substantially equivalent to the identified predicate device. Although there are some minor differences between the proposed Polaris Bipolar Electrosurgical Generator System and the predicate Aura 70W Bipolar Electrosurgical Generator, these differences do not raise new or different questions of safety and efficacy.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.