The tmCMF Solution is intended for use as a software system and image segmentation system for the transfer of imaging information from a medical scanner such as a CT-based system. The input data file is processed by the tmCMF Solution, and the result is an output data file that may then be provided as digital models or used as input to a rapid prototyping portion of the system that produces physical outputs including anatomical models, surgical guides, and dental splints for use in maxillofacial and mandibular surgery. The surgical guides and dental splints are intended to be used for the maxillofacial and mandibular bone in maxillofacial and mandibular surgery. The tmCMF Solution is also intended as a preoperative software tool for simulating/evaluating surgical treatment options.
Device Story
tmCMF Solution is a software and hardware system for maxillofacial and mandibular surgery. Input: CT/dental scan data. Process: Surgeon Review Tool (SRT) software enables image segmentation, surgical planning, and simulation; web-based interface allows surgeon review/approval of plans and designs. Output: Digital models and physical patient-specific devices (anatomical models, surgical guides, dental splints) produced via additive manufacturing. Usage: Preoperative planning and intraoperative guidance; guides assist in bone marking/osteotomy; splints assist in dental alignment. Benefits: Facilitates transfer of preoperative plans to surgery, improving accuracy of bone fixation and anatomical positioning. Operated by surgeons and trained personnel.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical data. Bench testing only. Includes cadaveric benchtop performance testing comparing preoperative plans to postoperative CT measurements, hardware integrity/verification, cleaning/sterilization validation (ISO 17665-1/2, AAMI ST79), biocompatibility (ISO 10993-1), software V&V (IEC 62304), and usability (IEC 62366-1).
Technological Characteristics
Software-based image segmentation and surgical planning system. Physical outputs (guides, models, splints) manufactured via additive manufacturing using biocompatible polymers. Provided non-sterile; steam sterilized by end-user (ISO 17665). Web-based interface for surgeon review. Connectivity: Networked/web-based.
Indications for Use
Indicated for use in maxillofacial and mandibular surgery to process medical scanner (CT) data for surgical planning, simulation, and the creation of patient-specific anatomical models, surgical guides, and dental splints.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A bone cutting instrument and accessories is a metal device intended for use in reconstructive oral surgery to drill or cut into the upper or lower jaw and may be used to prepare bone to insert a wire, pin, or screw. The device includes the manual bone drill and wire driver, powered bone drill, rotary bone cutting handpiece, and AC-powered bone saw.
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image contains the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). On the left is the Department of Health & Human Services logo. To the right of that is the FDA logo, which is a blue square with the letters "FDA" in white. To the right of the FDA logo is the text "U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION" in blue.
October 2, 2023
TechMah CMF Lyndsay Bowers VP Quality 2240 Sutherland Ave. Suite 2 Knoxville, Tennessee 37919
Re: K231520
Trade/Device Name: tmCMF Solution Regulation Number: 21 CFR 872.4120 Regulation Name: Bone Cutting Instrument And Accessories Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: DZJ, LLZ Dated: September 11, 2023 Received: September 11, 2023
Dear Lyndsay Bowers:
We have reviewed your section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database available at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
{1}------------------------------------------------
Additional information about changes that may require a new premarket notification are provided in the FDA guidance documents entitled "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99812/download) and "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Software Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99785/download).
Your device is also subject to, among other requirements, the Quality System (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820), which includes, but is not limited to, 21 CFR 820.30. Design controls; 21 CFR 820.90. Nonconforming product; and 21 CFR 820.100, Corrective and preventive action. Please note that regardless of whether a change requires premarket review, the QS regulation requires device manufacturers to review and approve changes to device design and production (21 CFR 820.30 and 21 CFR 820.70) and document changes and approvals in the device master record (21 CFR 820.181).
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR Part 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reportingcombination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR Parts 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reportingmdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about mediation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advice-comprehensive-regulatoryassistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
{2}------------------------------------------------
Sincerely,
# Michael E. Adjodha -S
Michael E. Adjodha, MChE, RAC, CQIA Assistant Director DHT1B: Division of Dental and ENT Devices OHT1: Office of Ophthalmic, Anesthesia, Respiratory, ENT and Dental Devices Office of Product Evaluation and Quality Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{3}------------------------------------------------
# Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K231520
Device Name tmCMF Solution
#### Indications for Use (Describe)
The traCMF Solution is intended for use as a software system and image segmentation system for the transfer of imaging information from a medical scanner such as a CT-based system. The input data file is processed by the tmCMF Solution, and the result is an output data file that may then be provided as digital models or used as input to a rapid prototyping portion of the system that produces physical outputs including anatomical models, surgical guides, and dental splints for use in maxillofacial and mandibular surgery. The surgical guides and dental splints are intended to the maxillofacial and mandibular bone in mandibular surgery. The tmCMF Solution is also intended as a preoperative software tool for simulating/evaluating surgical treatment options.
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
| <span style="font-family: DejaVu Sans, sans-serif">☑</span> Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) | <span style="font-family: DejaVu Sans, sans-serif">☐</span> Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C) |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
#### *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{4}------------------------------------------------
# 510(k) SUMMARY
# K231520
This summary of 510(k) safety and effectiveness information is submitted in accordance with the requirements of 21 CFR §807.92:
Date Prepared: October 2, 2023
## I. CONTACT DETAILS
| Applicant Name: | TechMah CMF |
|------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Applicant Contact Telephone: | +1.865.200.4376 |
| Applicant Contact: | Dr. Mohamed Mahfouz |
| Applicant Contact Email: | mmahfouz@tmcmf.com |
| Applicant Address: | 2240 Sutherland Avenue, Suite 2<br>Knoxville, TN 37919 United States |
| Correspondent Name: | TechMah CMF |
|----------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Correspondent Contact Telephone: | +1.410.258.2770 |
| Correspondent Contact: | Mrs. Lyndsay Bowers |
| Correspondent Contact Email: | lbowers@tmcmf.com |
| Correspondent Address: | 2240 Sutherland Avenue, Suite 2<br>Knoxville, TN 37919 United States |
## II. DEVICE NAME
| Device Trade Name: | tmCMF Solution |
|--------------------------|-----------------------------------------------|
| Device Common Name: | Surgical Guide and Surgical Planning Software |
| Classification Name: | Bone Cutting Instrument And Accessories |
| Regulation Number: | 21 CFR §872.4120 |
| Product Code: | DZJ |
| Subsequent Product Code: | LLZ |
## III. LEGALLY MARKETED PREDICATE DEVICES
| Predicate Number: | K192282 |
|-----------------------|------------------------|
| Predicate Trade Name: | MedCAD AccuPlan System |
| Product Code: | DZJ |
{5}------------------------------------------------
## IV. LEGALLY MARKETED REFERENCE DEVICES
| Predicate Number: | K103136 |
|-----------------------|-----------------------------------------|
| Predicate Trade Name: | SurgiCase mandible/maxillofacial guides |
| Product Code: | JEY |
| Predicate Number: | K170419 |
| Predicate Trade Name: | SurgiCase Viewer |
| Product Code: | LLZ |
| Predicate Number: | K210347 |
| Predicate Trade Name: | VSP System |
| Product Code: | DZJ, LLZ |
| Predicate Number: | K120956 |
| Predicate Trade Name: | VSP System |
| Product Code: | DZJ, LLZ |
## V. DEVICE DESCRIPTION SUMMARY
The TechMah CMF (tmCMF) Solution is a family of personalized product solutions for trauma and reconstruction procedures in the mandible and midface. The solution is comprised of Surgeon Review Tool (SRT) software, and maxillofacial and mandibular surqical instruments (surgical quides, anatomical models, and dental splints). The surqical instruments are patient-specific devices and are designed utilizing CT and dental scan patient image data.
Surgical guides are patient-specific devices or templates that are based on preoperative software planning and are designed to fit a specific patient. These guides are used to assist a surgeon in transferring the pre-operative plan to the surgery by guiding the marking of bone for plate fixation screws and the position of the osteotomy marking slots. Surgical guides are available for treatment (maxilla and mandible) and harvesting (fibula, iliac crest, and scapula). Guides can be used in conjunction with anatomical models to verify anatomical positioning and fit.
Anatomical models are patient-specific models that are based on pre-operative anatomy and surgical planning specific to a patient. These models are used to assist a surgeon in transferring the pre-operative plan to the surgery by representing preoperative, intra-operative, and post-operative anatomical models as guidance. Anatomical models are available for treatment (maxilla and mandible), and harvesting (fibula, iliac crest, and scapula) anatomy. Anatomical models can be used to check
{6}------------------------------------------------
quide fit.
Dental splints are patient-specific devices or templates that are based on preoperative software surgical planning and are designed to fit a specific patient. Dental splints are available as single splint desired occlusions or combined splint-in-splint option. These templates are used to assist a surgeon in transferring the pre-operative plan to the surgery by guiding the dental alignment of bone and teeth.
The Surgeon Review Tool (SRT) software is used by surgeons for the review and approval of surgical plans and surgical instrument designs. The SRT software is accessed through a web interface from a surgeon's device.
## VI. INTENDED USE/INDICATIONS FOR USE
The tmCMF Solution is intended for use as a software system and image seqmentation system for the transfer of imaging information from a medical scanner such as a CT-based system. The input data file is processed by the tmCMF Solution, and the result is an output data file that may then be provided as digital models or used as input to a rapid prototyping portion of the system that produces physical outputs including anatomical models, surgical guides, and dental splints for use in maxillofacial and mandibular surgery. The surgical guides and dental splints are intended to be used for the maxillofacial and mandibular bone in maxillofacial and mandibular surgery. The tmCMF Solution is also intended as a preoperative software tool for simulating/evaluating surgical treatment options.
{7}------------------------------------------------
# VII. SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE COMPARISON
| | tmCMF Solution<br>(Subject device) | MedCAD® AccuPlan® System<br>(Predicate device) K192282 | SurgiCase Viewer<br>(K170419) Reference Device | SurgiCase<br>mandible/maxillofacial guides<br>(K103136) Reference Device | VSP System<br>(Reference device)<br>K210347 |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Indication for Use | The tmCMF Solution is<br>intended for use as a software<br>system and image<br>segmentation system for the<br>transfer of imaging information<br>from a medical scanner such<br>as a CT-based system. The<br>input data file is processed by<br>the tmCMF Solution, and the<br>result is an output data file that<br>may then be provided as<br>digital models or used as input<br>to a rapid prototyping portion<br>of the system that produces<br>physical outputs including<br>anatomical models, surgical<br>guides, and dental splints for<br>use in maxillofacial and<br>mandibular surgery. The<br>surgical guides and dental<br>splints are intended to be used<br>for the maxillofacial and<br>mandibular bone in<br>maxillofacial and mandibular<br>surgery. The tmCMF Solution<br>is also intended as a<br>preoperative software tool for<br>simulating/evaluating surgical<br>treatment options. | The MedCAD® AccuPlan®<br>System is intended for use as a<br>software system and image<br>segmentation system for the<br>transfer of imaging information<br>from a medical scanner such as<br>a CT based system. The input<br>data file is processed by the<br>MedCAD® AccuPlan® System<br>and the result is an output data<br>file that may then be provided as<br>digital models or used as input to<br>a rapid prototyping portion of the<br>system that produces physical<br>outputs including anatomical<br>models, surgical guides, and<br>dental splints for use in<br>maxillofacial surgery. The<br>surgical guides and dental<br>splints are intended to be used<br>for the maxillofacial bone in<br>maxillofacial surgery. The<br>MedCAD® AccuPlan® System is<br>also intended as a preoperative<br>software tool for simulating /<br>evaluating surgical treatment<br>options. | SurgiCase Viewer is intended<br>to be used as a software<br>interface to assist in<br>visualization and<br>communication of treatment<br>options. | SurgiCase Guides are intended to<br>be used as surgical tools to<br>transfer a pre-operative plan to the<br>surgery. The devices are intended<br>to guide the marking of bone<br>and/or guide surgical instruments<br>in mandibular and maxillofacial<br>surgical procedures | The VSP® System is<br>intended for use as a<br>software system and<br>image segmentation<br>system for the transfer of<br>imaging information from a<br>medical scanner such as a<br>CT based system.<br>The input data file is<br>processed by the VSP®<br>System and the result is an<br>output data file that may<br>then be provided as digital<br>models or used as input to<br>a rapid prototyping portion<br>of the system that<br>produces physical outputs<br>including anatomical<br>models, templates, and<br>surgical guides for use in<br>maxillofacial surgery. |
| Preoperative<br>software | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Image transformation into<br>3D models, Computer<br>Aided Design, Surgical<br>planning / simulation |
| Additive<br>manufacturing of<br>splint, guides, and<br>models | Yes | Yes | Unknown | Yes | 3D Printing to produce<br>physical output devices |
| Data Inputs | Images from medical scanners | Images from medical scanners | Images from medical<br>scanners | Images from medical scanners | DICOM file from Medical<br>Scanner (CT, CBCT),<br>patient contoured and<br>standard implant .STL files;<br>input from<br>Physician |
| | | | | | |
| | tmCMF Solution<br>(Subject device) | MedCAD® AccuPlan® System<br>(Predicate device) K192282 | SurgiCase Viewer<br>(K170419) Reference Device | SurgiCase<br>mandible/maxillofacial guides<br>(K103136) Reference Device | VSP System<br>(Reference device)<br>K210347 |
| Data Outputs | Output for dental splints,<br>surgical guides, and<br>anatomical models | Output for dental splints, surgical<br>guides, and anatomical models | Approved plans and designs | Output for dental splints, surgical<br>guides, and anatomical models | Output for dental splints,<br>surgical guides, and<br>anatomical models |
| Physical Outputs | Dental splints, surgical guide,<br>anatomical models, and<br>patient-specific case reports | Dental splints, surgical guide,<br>anatomical models, and patient-<br>specific case reports | Unknown | Dental splints, surgical guide, | Dental splints, surgical<br>guide,<br>anatomical models |
| Sterilization | Device is provided non-sterile<br>and is steam sterilized by the<br>end-user | Device is provided non-sterile<br>and is steam sterilized by the<br>end-user | Unknown | Device is provided non-sterile and<br>is steam sterilized by the end-user | Steam sterilization |
| Manufacturing<br>Method | Additive Manufacturing | Additive Manufacturing | Unknown | Additive Manufacturing | Additive Manufacturing |
| Web Interface | Yes | Unknown | Yes | No | Unknown |
| 2D Image Display<br>Axial<br>Sagittal<br>Coronal | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| 3D Visualization | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Installation<br>Required | No | Unknown | No | Yes | Unknown |
| Physician<br>Interaction with<br>Planning and<br>Physician Model /<br>Guide Approval | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Single Use | Yes | Yes | NA | Yes | Yes |
{8}------------------------------------------------
{9}------------------------------------------------
## VIII. INDICATIONS FOR USE COMPARISON
The tmCMF Solution has equivalent indication for use as its predicate device. The primary indication is to utilize pre-operative imaging data to perform surgical case planning and create patient-specific instrumentation to transfer the pre-operative plan on the patient in the operating room.
## Differences
- . The predicate specifically refers to maxillofacial surgery, whereas the subject device covers both maxillofacial and mandibular surgeries, which is equivalent to the reference device (K103136).
- . The predicate device does not include graft harvesting surgical guides, whereas the subject does. However, the predicate device (K120956) used by the current predicate (K192282) also included harvesting surgical guides, which is equivalent to the reference device (K210347)
- . The predicate device has a limited contact for the splint whereas the subject device has a prolonged contact for splints to allow for post-op usage of up to 30 days. However, the predicate device (K120956) used by the current predicate (K192282) also has a prolonged contact for splints to allow for postop usage of up to 30 days, which is equivalent to the reference device (K210347).
## IX. TECHNOLOGICAL COMPARISON (WITH PREDICATE DEVICE)
### Similarities to Predicate
The tmCMF Solution has the same intended use and similar technological characteristics as the identified predicate device. The system employs similar fundamental technologies as the identified predicates including input case data, manipulation, and surgical planning. The principles of operation and technological characteristics are either identical or substantially equivalent to the predicate. The system has similar technological characteristics including:
- System inputs: images from medical scanners (ex: CT), dental models, and/or . implant files (.STL)
- . System outputs: physical and/ or digital outputs such as patient-specific anatomical models, guides, and splints
- Materials: biocompatible polymers
- Sterility assurance level of 1x10-6 ●
The intended use of the subject device and the predicate both provide tools and accessories (software for image manipulation, anatomical models, splints, and guides) for use in reconstructive surgery. Additionally, both the subject and the predicate device are intended to be used by trained personnel with active support
{10}------------------------------------------------
from the surgeon.
Differences to Predicate
- The predicate specifically refers to maxillofacial surgery, whereas the subject ● device covers both maxillofacial and mandibular surgeries.
- . The predicate device does not include graft harvesting surgical quides, whereas the subject does. However, the predicate device (K120956) used by the current predicate (K192282) also included harvesting surgical guides.
- The predicate device has a limited contact for the splint whereas the subject device has a prolonged contact for splints to allow for post-op usage of up to 30 days. However, the predicate device (K120956) used by the current predicate (K192282) also has a prolonged contact for splints to allow for postop usage of up to 30 days.
## X. TECHNOLOGICAL COMPARISON (WITH REFERENCE DEVICES)
Reference device K170419:
- The reference device served as a technologically equivalent device for the ● Surgeon Review Tool (SRT).
Reference device K103136:
- . This reference device was used to establish performance equivalence data.
Reference devices K210347 and K120956:
- The reference devices served as the basis for establishing equivalence on physical product features and offerings, product material compositions and their manufacturing processes. The reference devices encompass anatomical models, surgical guides, and dental splints, with the subject device utilizing similar product features and identical materials to ensure a state of equivalence.
The addition of the reference device comparison presents another substantially equivalent device with identical physical outputs, materials, and manufacturing processes.
## XI. NON-CLINICAL AND/OR CLINICAL TESTS SUMMARY
The following performance data were provided in support of the substantial equivalence determination.
## Cleaning
Testing was performed to validate the end-user cleaning protocol of the subject
{11}------------------------------------------------
device per the FDA Guidance Document "Reprocessing Medical Devices in Health Care Settings: Validation Methods and Labeling" and AAMI TIR 30.
## Sterilization
Testing was performed to validate the end-user sterilization protocol of the subject device per ISO 17665-1, ISO 17665-2, and ANSI/AAMI ST79.
## Biocompatibility
Biocompatibility assessment per the FDA Guidance "Use of International Standard ISO 10993-1, "Biological evaluation of medical devices - Part 1: Evaluation and testing within a risk management process" and biocompatibility testing per ISO 10993-1:2018 for its contact classification was conducted to ensure the biocompatibility of the materials and manufacturing process used in the tmCMF surgical instruments.
## Software Verification and Validation
Software Verification and Validation Testing was conducted in accordance with the requirements of IEC 62304:2006/A1:2015. The following FDA quidance documents were also followed: General Principles of Software Validation, Off-The-Shelf Software Used in Medical Devices, Cybersecurity for Networked Medical Devices Containing Off-the-Shelf Software, Postmarket Management of Cybersecurity in Medical Devices, Guidance for the Content of Premarket Submissions for Device Software Functions.
## Usability
Usability was validated in accordance with IEC 62366-1:2020.
## Benchtop Performance
Benchtop performance testing was performed to demonstrate the performance of the tmCMF Solution and substantial equivalence with the predicate device. The testing aligns with the test strategy and performance metrics used by the predicate.
| Hardware Performance<br>Verification | Testing demonstrated that the surgical guide and<br>dental splint meets the predetermined acceptance<br>criteria. |
|--------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Cadaveric Benchtop<br>Performance Testing | Comparison of pre-operative surgical plan to post-<br>operative CT measurements. Results passed the<br>predetermined acceptance criteria, indicating<br>substantial equivalence. |
| Hardware Integrity test<br>Verification | Testing demonstrated that the instruments meet the<br>predetermined acceptance criteria. |
| Hardware Verification<br>Inspection and Analysis | Testing demonstrated that instruments' implementation<br>is compliant with the acceptance criteria. |
{12}------------------------------------------------
| Surgical Case Verification | Testing demonstrated that the surgical case reports<br>are compliant with acceptance criteria. |
|----------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| System Validation | Testing demonstrated that the system has met user<br>needs and is compliant with acceptance criteria. |
# XII. CONCLUSION
The tmCMF Solution has the same intended use as the predicate device and similar technological characteristics as the predicate and reference devices. Therefore, the subject device is substantially equivalent.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.