3M Clarity Aligners are indicated for the alignment of teeth during orthodontic treatment of malocclusion.
Device Story
3M Clarity Aligners are a series of clear, removable, thermoformed plastic trays used for orthodontic tooth movement. The system includes two material flexibilities: 'Flex' for patient comfort and 'Force' for increased force persistence. A dental professional (orthodontist or dentist) prescribes the treatment based on intra-oral scans or physical impressions. The provider reviews and approves a digital model scheme; 3M then manufactures the custom trays. The patient wears the trays, which apply pressure to the dentition to achieve programmed tooth displacement. The provider monitors the patient from the delivery of the first aligner to the final tray. The device offers an aesthetic alternative to conventional wire and bracket systems.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. Performance evaluations included translucency, abrasion resistance, formability, mechanical/dimensional stability, force persistence, fatigue cracking resistance, and chemical staining resistance. Biocompatibility was assessed per ISO 10993 and ISO 7405 standards for mucosal membrane contact (>30 days), with safety confirmed by a Diplomate of the American Board of Toxicology.
Technological Characteristics
Clear, thermoformed plastic aligners composed of Poly Cyclohexylenedimethylene Terephthalate Glycol-Modified (PCTG). Multi-layer film construction. Operates via mechanical pressure applied to dentition based on programmed displacement. No change in software or manufacturing process from predicate. Biocompatibility assessed for long-term mucosal contact.
Indications for Use
Indicated for orthodontic patients requiring tooth alignment to treat malocclusion.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
An orthodontic plastic bracket is a plastic device intended to be bonded to a tooth to apply pressure to a tooth from a flexible orthodontic wire to alter its position.
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image contains the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The logo consists of two parts: the symbol of the Department of Health & Human Services on the left and the FDA acronym with the full name of the agency on the right. The FDA part is in blue, with the acronym in a solid blue square and the full name written in a smaller font next to it.
May 22, 2023
3M Company, Unitek Orthodontic Products % Prithul Bom Most Responsible Person Regulatory Technology Services, LLC 1000 Westgate Drive, Suite 510k Saint Paul, Minnesota 55114
Re: K231464
Trade/Device Name: 3M™ Clarity™ Aligners (3M™ Clarity™ Aligners-Force, 3M™ Clarity™ Aligners-Flex) Regulation Number: 21 CFR 872.5470 Regulation Name: Orthodontic plastic bracket Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: NXC Dated: May 19, 2023 Received: May 19, 2023
Dear Prithul Bom:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database located at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of
{1}------------------------------------------------
Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reportingcombination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reportingmdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about mediation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advice-comprehensive-regulatoryassistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
Michael E. Adjodha -S
Michael E. Adjodha, M.ChE. Assistant Director DHT1B: Division of Dental and ENT Devices OHT1: Office of Ophthalmic, Anesthesia, Respiratory, ENT and Dental Devices Office of Product Evaluation and Quality Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
# Indications for Use
Submission Number (if known)
K231464
Device Name
3M™ Clarity™ Aligners (3M™ Clarity™ Aligners-Force, 3M™ ClarityTM Aligners-Flex)
Indications for Use (Describe)
| 3M Clarity <sup>TM</sup> Aligners are indicated for the alignment of teeth during orthodontic treatment of |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| malocclusion. |
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
#### CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
#### *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW."
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
3M™ Company Unitek Orthodontic Products Traditional 510(k) Premarket Notification 3M™ Clarity™ Aligners (Force and Flex)
# 510(k) Summary 3M™ Clarity™ Aligners (Flex and Force)
{4}------------------------------------------------
3M™ Company Unitek Orthodontic Products
Traditional 510(k) Premarket Notification 3M™ Clarity™ Aligners (Force and Flex)
Image /page/4/Picture/2 description: The image shows the 3M logo. The logo consists of the number "3" and the letter "M" in a bold, red font. The letters are connected and slightly overlapping. The background is white.
This 510(k) summary is submitted in accordance with the requirements of 21 CFR 807.92.
# Submitter Information
| 510(k) Submitter | 3M Company<br>Unitek Orthodontic Products<br>2510 Conway Avenue<br>St. Paul, MN 55144<br>Establishment Registration No.: 2110898 |
|-------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Primary Contact | Brittany Randolph<br>Regulatory Affairs<br>brandolph@mmm.com |
| Secondary Contact | Kristin Totushek<br>Regulatory Affairs Manager<br>Phone: (651) 285-4332<br>ktotushek@mmm.com |
# Subject Device Information
| Submission Date | 09 May 2023 |
|------------------------|-----------------------------|
| Proprietary Trade Name | 3MTM ClarityTM Aligners |
| Device Name | Aligner |
| Common Name | Sequential Aligner |
| Classification Name | Orthodontic Plastic Bracket |
| Regulation Number | 21 CFR 872.5470 |
| Product Code | NXC |
| Classification Panel | Dental Products Panel 76 |
| Classification | Medical Device, Class II |
{5}------------------------------------------------
#### Indications for Use:
3MTM Clarity™ Aligners are indicated for the alignment of teeth during orthodontic treatment of malocclusion.
#### Predicate Device:
| Product Name | 3M Clarity Aligners (3M Clarity Aligners-<br>Force, 3M Clarity Aligners-Flex) |
|---------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Manufacturer | 3M Company<br>Unitek Orthodontic Products<br>2510 Conway Avenue<br>St. Paul, MN 55144 |
| 510(k) Number | K211190 |
| Device Class | 2 |
#### Description of Device:
3M™ Clarity™ Aligners (3M™ Clarity™ Aligners-Force. 3M™ Clarity™ Aligners-Flex) are a series of clear plastic aligners that offer a solution for patients who want an aesthetic orthodontic treatment by utilizing a set of removable aligners to correct tooth malocclusions without the use of conventional wire and bracket orthodontic technology. The present Premarket Submission is for the simplification in the number of formulations of the aligner material. This simplification allows for streamlined manufacturing processes so that both 3M Clarity Aligners-Flex and 3M Clarity Aligners-Force can be composed of the same material with differing flexibilities. The aligners will still be named 3M™ Clarity™ Aligners (3M™ Clarity™ Aligners-Force, 3M™ Clarity™ Aligners-Flex).
3M is offering a treatment plan with two different aligner flexibilities where the dental health professional will determine which degree of flexibility to use during the treatment plan. 3M Clarity Aligners-Flex is designed to be more flexible thereby increasing patient comfort and ease of insertion and removal. 3M Clarity Aligners-Force is designed to be more rigid increasing the force persistence. 3M will continue to offer the option of combination treatment plans where both 3M Clarity Aligners-Flex and 3M Clarity Aligners-Force can be used.
A dental health professional (e.g., orthodontist or dentist), prescribes 3M™ Clarity™ Alieners (3MTM Clarity™ Aligners-Force, 3MTM Clarity™ Aligners-Flex) based on an assessment of the patient's teeth and determines a course of treatment with the system. Patient data is collected via intra-oral scanning or taking physical impressions. The prescribing physician reviews and approves the model scheme before the molds are produced. Once approved. 3M produces trays, which are formed of clear, thin, thermoformed plastic. The trays are sent back to the dental health care professional who then provides them to the patient, confirming fit and design. The dental care professional monitors treatment from the first aligner is delivered to
{6}------------------------------------------------
3M™ Company Unitek Orthodontic Products
when the final aligner is delivered. The trays are held in place by pressure and can be removed by the patient at any time.
#### Technological Characteristics:
3MTM ClarityTM Aligners (3MTM Clarity™ Aligners-Force, 3M™ ClarityTM Aligners-Flex) and the previously cleared aligners, 3M Clarity Aligners (3M Clarity Aligners-Force, 3M Clarity Aligners-Flex) (K211190) technological characteristics are similar but not identical. They have the same design, device features, software, and manufacturing processes but the material is different. The subject device introduces a new material formulation but the simplification of the aligner material formulation does not impact the safety and effectiveness. Differences in technological characteristics of the subject device and the predicate device have been evaluated in accordance with the Agency's Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff: The 510(k) Program: Evaluating Substantial Equivalence in Premarket Notifications [510(k)] dated July 28, 2014. Differences in the technological characteristics do not raise significant concerns about safety or effectiveness.
| Substantial Equivalence – Intended/Indicated Use, Technological Characteristics | | |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Feature | Predicate Device:<br>3M™ Clarity™ Aligners (3M™<br>Clarity™ Aligners-Force, 3M™<br>Clarity™ Aligners-Flex) | Subject Device:<br>3M™ Clarity™ Aligners (3M™<br>Clarity™ Aligners-Force, 3M™<br>Clarity™ Aligners-Flex) |
| Manufacturer | 3M Company<br>Unitek Orthodontic Products<br>2510 Conway Avenue<br>St. Paul, MN 55144 | No change |
| 510(k) Number | K211190 | To be determined |
| Regulation<br>Number | 21 CFR 872.5470 | No change |
| Product Code | NXC | No change |
| Device Class | Class II | No change |
| Intended Use: | This product is intended for use in<br>orthodontic treatment. | No change |
| Indications for<br>Use: | 3M Clarity Aligners are indicated for<br>the alignment of teeth during<br>orthodontic treatment of<br>malocclusion. | No change |
| Manufacturing<br>Process | Aligners are manufactured using a<br>thermoform process. | No change |
{7}------------------------------------------------
| Substantial Equivalence – Intended/Indicated Use, Technological Characteristics | | |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Feature | Predicate Device:<br>3M™ Clarity™ Aligners (3M™<br>Clarity™ Aligners-Force, 3M™<br>Clarity™ Aligners-Flex) | Subject Device:<br>3M™ Clarity™ Aligners (3M™<br>Clarity™ Aligners-Force, 3M™<br>Clarity™ Aligners-Flex) |
| Material | Two Copolyesters | Copolyester<br>Poly Cyclohexylenedimethylene<br>Terephthalate Glycol-Modified<br>(PCTG) |
| Technical<br>Features and<br>Properties | Orthodontic tooth movements occur<br>through forces applied to the<br>dentition as each tooth follows the<br>programmed displacement based on a<br>doctor's prescription. | No change |
| Software | Proprietary software is used in the<br>manufacturing process of the<br>currently commercialized aligners. | No change |
## Performance Testing:
Results of translucency properties, abrasion resistance, formability, mechanical stability, dimensional stability, force persistence, fatigue cracking resistance, chemical staining resistance, transportation, and use life testing among others are included in this Premarket submission. All performance testing shows acceptable results for all tested samples.
#### Software
There are no significant changes in the software used to prepare treatment plans or produce trays compared to the predicate device, 3M Clarity Aligners (3M Clarity Aligners-Force, 3M Clarity Aligners-Flex).
#### Biocompatibility Testing
3M™ Clarity™ Aligners (3M™ Clarity™ Aligners-Force, 3M™ Clarity™ Aligners-Flex) were assessed as a mucosal membrane contacting device that is intended to be in contact with the body for greater than 30 days.
{8}------------------------------------------------
MTM Company Jnitek Orthodontic Products
Traditional 510(k) Premarket Notification 3MTM ClarityTM Aligners (Force and Flex)
In accordance with the combined guidance found in ISO 10993, ISO 7405, Testing guidelines outlined in the US FDA Docket Number FDA-2013-D-0350, and Japan: PSEHB/MDED No. 0106-1 and 0612-4, the following endpoints below must be considered in the biocompatibility evaluation of this product: Physical and/or Chemical Information, Cytotoxicity, Sensitization, rritation/Intracutaneous Reactivity, Acute Systemic Toxicity, Material-Mediated Pyrogenicity, Sub-acute Toxicity, Sub-chronic Toxicity, Genotoxicity, Implantation, and Chronic Toxicity.
A Diplomate of the American Board of Toxicology has assessed the safety of this product and nas determined that it is safe for its intended use.
#### Substantial Equivalence
Substantial equivalency of the subject device, 3M™ Clarity™ Aligners (3MTM Clarity™ Aligners-Force, 3M™ Clarity™ Aligners-Flex) to the predicate device, 3M™ Clarity™ Aligners (3M™ Clarity™ Aligners-Force, 3M™ Clarity™ Aligners-Flex) is made on the basis of intended/indicated use, technological characteristics, and performance testing. The subject device and the predicate device are similar in that they have:
- same intended use. ●
- same indications for use, ●
- same design and device features
- same manufacturing software
- same manufacturing processes ●
- similar technological characteristics
The differences in the technological characteristics between the subject device and predicate device do not raise different questions of safety or efficacy. Therefore, the subject device is ound to be substantially equivalent to the legally marketed predicate device, 3M™ Clarity™ ligners (3MTM ClarityTM Aligners-Force, 3MTM Clarity™ Aligners-Flex) (K211190).
{9}------------------------------------------------
### Conclusion:
The indications for use of 3M™ Clarity™ Aligners (3M™ Clarity™ Aligners-Force, 3M™ Clarity™ Aligners-Flex) are the same as the previously cleared device, 3M™ Clarity™ Aligners (3MTM Clarity™ Aligners-Force, 3MTM Clarity™ Aligners-Flex) (K211190). Both devices are rthodontic clear tray aligners with a multi-layer film construction. The subject devices echnological characteristics are similar but not identical to the predicate device.
ifferences in technological characteristics of the subject device and the predicate device has een evaluated in accordance with the Agency's Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff: The 510(k) Program: Evaluating Substantial Equivalence in Premarket Notifications [510(k)] dated July 28, 2014. Differences in the technological characteristics do not raise significant concerns about safety or effectiveness. Bench testing was conducted to compare the performance of 3M™ Clarity™ Aligners (3M™ Clarity™ Aligners-Force, 3M™ ClarityTM Aligners-Flex) to the previously cleared device, 3M™ Clarity™ Aligners (3MTM Clarity™ ligners-Force, 3M™ Clarity™ Aligners-Flex) (K211190). Testing demonstrates that the safety nd performance of the subject device are substantially equivalent to the predicate device.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.