K231448 · Smith & Nephew, Inc. · LZY · Jul 19, 2023 · Orthopedic
Device Facts
Record ID
K231448
Device Name
TANDEM Hip System
Applicant
Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Product Code
LZY · Orthopedic
Decision Date
Jul 19, 2023
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 888.3360
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic, Real-World Evidence
Real-World Evidence
Submission
Device
Sponsor
RWD Sources
RWE Use Summary
Key Tags
K231448 · Jul 19, 2023
TANDEM Hip System
Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Post-market surveillance data
Post-market surveillance data was utilized to refine and limit the indications for use and target patient population for the TANDEM Hip System as part of labeling updates.
Post-market surveillance; Labeling update; Indications for use
The Smith & Nephew TANDEM Unipolar and Bipolar Hip System is intended for partial hip arthroplasty in skeletally mature patients. It is indicated for use in patients not suitable for total hip arthroplasty, with a non-functional femoral neck fracture. The TANDEM Unipolar and Bipolar head components are intended to articulate against the natural acetabulum, which requires no use of bone cement.
Device Story
TANDEM Hip System comprises unipolar and bipolar femoral head components for partial hip arthroplasty; replaces diseased, affected, or broken femoral head/neck while preserving natural acetabulum. Unipolar version provides single rotational point; bipolar version provides two rotational points. Used in orthopedic surgery; implanted by surgeons. Devices articulate against host acetabular articular cartilage without bone cement. System includes femoral heads, taper sleeves, and (for bipolar) UHMWPE liners. Subject of 510(k) for labeling updates to align with European Medical Device Regulation 2017/745 and standardize verbiage; no changes to design, materials, or manufacturing. Benefits patients by restoring hip function in cases where total hip arthroplasty is not indicated.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical data or bench testing performed; submission is for labeling updates only. Devices are identical to previously cleared predicates.
Technological Characteristics
Materials: Cobalt-Chromium alloy (ASTM F75, ISO 5832-4), Titanium alloy Ti6Al4V (ASTM F1472, ISO 5832-3; ASTM F136), UHMWPE (ASTM F648, ISO 5834-2). Design: Unipolar (single rotation point) and Bipolar (dual rotation point) femoral head components. Non-cemented articulation against natural acetabulum.
Indications for Use
Indicated for partial hip arthroplasty in skeletally mature patients not suitable for total hip arthroplasty, specifically those with a non-functional femoral neck fracture.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A hip joint femoral (hemi-hip) metallic cemented or uncemented prosthesis is a device intended to be implanted to replace a portion of the hip joint. This generic type of device includes prostheses that have a femoral component made of alloys, such as cobalt-chromium-molybdenum. This generic type of device includes designs which are intended to be fixed to the bone with bone cement (§ 888.3027) as well as designs which have large window-like holes in the stem of the device and which are intended for use without bone cement. However, in these latter designs, fixation of the device is not achieved by means of bone ingrowth.
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). On the left is the Department of Health & Human Services logo. To the right of that is the FDA logo, with the letters "FDA" in a blue square. To the right of the blue square is the text "U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION" in blue.
July 19, 2023
Smith & Nephew, Inc. Nikita Deshpande Sr. Regulatory Affairs Specialist 1450 Brooks Road Memphis, Tennessee 38116
Re: K231448
Trade/Device Name: TANDEM Hip System Regulation Number: 21 CFR 888.3360 Regulation Name: Hip Joint Femoral (Hemi-Hip) Metallic Cemented Or Uncemented Prosthesis Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: LZY, KWY Dated: May 18, 2023 Received: May 18, 2023
Dear Nikita Deshpande:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database located at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's
{1}------------------------------------------------
requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reportingcombination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (OS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reportingmdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about mediation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advice-comprehensive-regulatoryassistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
Limin Sun-S
Limin Sun, Ph.D. Assistant Director DHT6A: Division of JointArthroplasty Devices OHT6: Office of Orthopedic Devices Office of Product Evaluation and Quality Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Food and Drug Administration
## Indications for Use
Submission Number (if known)
K231448
Device Name
TANDEM Hip System
#### Indications for Use (Describe)
The Smith & Nephew TANDEM Unipolar and Bipolar Hip System is intended for partial hip arthroplasty in skeletally mature patients. It is indicated for use in patients not suitable for total hip arthroplasty, with a non-functional femoral head due to femoral neck fracture.
The TANDEM Unipolar and Bipolar head components are intended to articulate against the natural acetabulum, which requires no use of bone cement.
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
< | Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
### CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
### *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
| | K231448 Page 1 of 3 | | |
|----------------------|---------------------|--|--|
| VI-\ C- LIGO 100 OUL | 0000 0- 11 | | |
21 CFR 807.92(a)(1)
| Applicant Name | Smith & Nephew, Inc. | |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------|
| Applicant Address | 1450 Brooks Road Memphis TN 38116 United States | |
| Applicant Contact Telephone | 901-825-8527 | |
| Applicant Contact | Ms. Nikita Deshpande | |
| Applicant Contact Email | nikita.deshpande@smith-nephew.com | |
| | 21 CFR 807.92(a)(2) | |
| Device Trade Name | TANDEM Hip System | |
| Common Name | Hip joint femoral (hemi-hip) metallic cemented or uncemented prosthesis | |
| Classification Name | Prosthesis, Hip, Hemi-, Femoral, Metal Ball | |
| Regulation Number | 888.3360 | |
| Product Code | LZY | |
| | 21 CFR 807.92(a)(3) | |
| Predicate # | Predicate Trade Name (Primary Predicate is listed first) | Product Code |
| K896580 | TANDEM UNI-POLAR Hip System | LZY |
| K023743 | TANDEM International Bipolar Hip System | KWY |
| K211176 | Smith & Nephew Hip System | LPH |
| | 21 CFR 807.92(a)(4) | |
| The purpose of this traditional 510(k) is to notify FDA of Smith & Nephew's intent to request clearance for labeling updates to Smith & | | |
Nephew's TANDEM Hip System.
The TANDEM Hip Systems have been initially cleared by FDA and the information related to the clearance of these devices has been provided below:
1. TANDEM Unipolar Hip System (CoCr Heads and Taper Sleeves) – K896580 (S.E Date – 02/15/1990) 2. TANDEM INTL (International) Bipolar Hip System – K023743 Letter To File (Date – 01/21/2004) Note: The TANDEM International Bipolar Hip System is a modified version of the TANDEM Bipolar System which was cleared for market under 510(k) submission number K023743.
The subject Smith & Nephew TANDEM Hip System devices are identical in function, design features, materials, sterilization, manufacturing methods and operational principles to what was previously 510(k) cleared. These labeling updates do not affect the safety and effectiveness of the subject devices when used as labeled.
The labeling updates include changes made to the (IFU), device labels, and surgical technique. The indications for use and target patient population have been limited for using the subject TANDEM Hip System devices and post market surveillance data. These updates have been made to the European Medical Device Regulation
{4}------------------------------------------------
2017/745 and standardization of verbiage across Smith & Nephew's hip implants.
The TANDEM Hip System is designed to be used for hemiarthroplasty as implantation of these devices replace diseased, affected, or broken femoral head and/or neck with a prosthetic component, while keeping the natural acetabulum, or hip socket, intact. The TANDEM Hip System includes the TANDEM Unipolar Hip System and TANDEM International Bipolar Hip Systems are used for partial hip replacement procedure, in which the unipolar shell are designed to articulate against the host acetabular articular cartilage and replace the femoral head and/or neck during the implantation procedure. The key difference between a unipolar and a bipolar version of the TANDEM Hip System is number of rotational points that are provided – single (unipolar) or two (bipolar) — within the socket.
### Materials
The TANDEM Unipolar Hip System comprises of unipolar femoral head and taper sleeve. The TANDEM Unipolar femoral head components are manufactured using Cobalt-Chromium alloy conforming to ASTM F75 and ISO 5832-4. The Taper Sleeve components are manufactured from titanium (Ti644V) alloy conforming to ASTM F1472 and ISO 5832-3. The Taper Sleeve components are also manufactured from annealed ELI (extra low interstitial) grade Titanium alloy (Ti6Al4V) conforming to ASTM F136.
The TANDEM International Bipolar Hip System is manufactured from cobalt chrom cobalt chromium (CoCr) alloy conforming to ASTM F75 and ISO 5832-4, Ultra High Molecular Weight Polyethylene (UHMWPE) conforming to ASTM F648 and ISO 5834-2, titanium (Ti6Al4V) alloy conforming to ASTM F1472 and ISO 5832-3.
## Intended Use/Indications for Use
The Smith & Nephew TANDEM Unipolar and Bipolar Hip System is intended for partial hip arthroplasty in skeletally mature patients. It is indicated for use in patients not suitable for total hip arthroplasty, with a non-functional femoral neck fracture.
The TANDEM Unipolar and Bipolar head components are intended to articulate against the natural acetabulum, which requires no use of bone cement.
## Indications for Use Comparison
The purpose of this traditional 510(k) is to notify FDA of Smith & Nephew's intent to request clearance for labeling updates to Smith & Nephew's TANDEM Hip System. The labeling updates include changes to the indications for use.
The Smith & Nephew TANDEM Unipolar and International Bipolar Hip Systems are identical in function, materials, sterilization, manufacturing methods and operational principles to the commercially available predicate devices TANDEM Unipolar Hip System (K896580, 02/15/1990) and TANDEM International Bipolar Hip System (K0237343, 01/21/2004).
The labeling updates include changes made to the (IFU), device labels, and surgical technique. The indications for use and target patient population have been limited for using the subject TANDEM Hip System devices and post market surveillance data. These updates have been made to the European Medical Device Regulation 2017/745 and standardization of verbiage across Smith & Nephew's hip implants.
## Technological Comparison
The devices that comprise the TANDEM Unipolar and Bipolar Hip System have the same technological characteristics, including device design and material, as the predicate devices previously cleared by the FDA. Therefore, no additional testing was performed for the subject devices to support the proposed labeling updates. There are no new issues related to safety and effectiveness of the subject devices.
#### Non-Clinical and/or Clinical Tests Summary & Conclusions 21 CFR 807.92(b)
The purpose of this traditional 510(k) is to request clearance from FDA for labeling changes to the subject Smith & Nephew TANDEM Hip System implants.
The subject Smith & Nephew TANDEM Hip System devices are identical in function, design features, materials, sterilization, manufacturing methods and operational principles to what was previously 510(k) cleared. These labeling updates do not affect the safety and effectiveness of the subject devices when used as labeled.
Therefore, since there are no changes to the design features, materials, or manufacturing methods of the TANDEM Hip System devices, no performance testing (bench, animal, clinical) was required.
## 21 CFR 807.92(a)(5)
## 21 CFR 807.92(a)(5)
# 21 CFR 807.92(a)(6)
{5}------------------------------------------------
Clinical data was not needed to support the safety and effectiveness of the subject devices.
No new or modified hip implant components are being introduced as a result of this filing. The subject devices are substantially equivalent to the previously 510(k) cleared predicate devices.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.