Retrospective clinical patient samples; Medical records/clinical diagnostic data
Retrospective analysis of clinical samples from patients with MGUS and non-MGUS polyclonal stimulation to evaluate the device's performance as an aid in the evaluation of MGUS.
MGUS; Retrospective study; Clinical performance; Diagnostic aid
Clinical Evidence
Study Design
Population
Comparator
Key Endpoints
Retrospective MGUS Performance Study; Retrospective cohort study
234 clinically confirmed MGUS patients and 140 non-MGUS patients with polyclonal immunostimulation; Sample Size: 374 total samples
Not applicable for this study
Positive rate in MGUS patients and negative agreement in non-MGUS patients
Retrospective MGUS Progression Study; Retrospective longitudinal study; Follow-up/Duration: At least four serial draws per patient
45 subjects with clinically stable MGUS and 4 subjects with progressive clinical status (MGUS to MM); Sample Size: 49 subjects
Not applicable for this study
Stability or progression of MGUS based on FLC concentration changes
Indications for Use
The Optilite Freelite Kappa Free Kit is intended for the quantitative in vitro measurement of Kappa free light chains in serum using the Binding Site Optilite analyzer. Measurement of free light chains aids in the diagnosis and monitoring of multiple myeloma, lymphocytic neoplasms, Waldenström’s macroglobulinemia, AL amyloidosis, light chain deposition disease and connective tissue diseases such as systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), and aids in the evaluation of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS). Results of the free light chain measurements should always be interpreted in conjunction with other laboratory and clinical findings. The Optilite Freelite Lambda Free Kit is intended for the quantitative in vitro measurement of Lambda free light chains in serum using the Binding Site Optilite analyzer. Measurement of free light chains aids in the diagnosis and monitoring of multiple myeloma, lymphocytic neoplasms, Waldenström’s macroglobulinemia, AL amyloidosis, light chain deposition disease and connective tissue diseases such as systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), and aids in the evaluation of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS). Results of the free light chain measurements should always be interpreted in conjunction with other laboratory and clinical findings.
Device Story
Device uses immunoturbidimetry to quantify Kappa and Lambda free light chains (FLC) in serum. Input: patient serum sample; reaction with polyclonal sheep anti-human FLC antibodies coated on latex particles. Principle: formation of insoluble immune complexes increases light scatter; decrease in intensity of incident light beam measured by Optilite analyzer. Output: quantitative FLC concentration and κ/λ ratio. Used in clinical laboratories by technicians/pathologists. Results interpreted alongside other clinical/laboratory findings to aid diagnosis/monitoring of plasma cell disorders and MGUS. Benefits: provides objective measurement of FLC levels to support clinical assessment of monoclonal gammopathies.
Clinical Evidence
Retrospective clinical studies evaluated MGUS performance. Study 1 (n=234 MGUS, n=140 non-MGUS): 59.4% positive rate in MGUS cohort; 86.4% negative agreement in non-MGUS cohort. Study 2 (n=49): evaluated serial draws in stable (n=45) and progressive (n=4) MGUS patients. Limitations noted: small sample size for progression study, performance not fully evaluated in LC-MGUS or across all ethnicities. Test is not a stand-alone diagnostic.
Indicated for quantitative in vitro measurement of serum Kappa and Lambda free light chains to aid in diagnosis and monitoring of multiple myeloma, lymphocytic neoplasms, Waldenström's macroglobulinaemia, AL amyloidosis, light chain deposition disease, connective tissue diseases (e.g., SLE), and evaluation of MGUS. Not established for pediatric use.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
An immunoglobulin (light chain specific) immunological test system is a device that consists of the reagents used to measure by immunochemical techniques both kappa and lambda types of light chain portions of immunoglobulin molecules in serum, other body fluids, and tissues. In some disease states, an excess of light chains are produced by the antibody-forming cells. These free light chains, unassociated with gamma globulin molecules, can be found in a patient's body fluids and tissues. Measurement of the various amounts of the different types of light chains aids in the diagnosis of multiple myeloma (cancer of antibody-forming cells), lymphocytic neoplasms (cancer of lymphoid tissue), Waldenstrom's macroglobulinemia (increased production of large immunoglobulins), and connective tissue diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis or systemic lupus erythematosus.
Predicate Devices
Freelite Human Kappa Free Kit for use on Roche Cobas Integra 400/400 plus (K070900)
Freelite Human Lambda Free Kit for use on Roche Cobas Integra 400/400 plus (K070900)
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}
FDA
U.S. FOOD & DRUG
ADMINISTRATION
# 510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION DECISION SUMMARY
ASSAY ONLY
## I Background Information:
A 510(k) Number
K231290
B Applicant
The Binding Site Ltd.
C Proprietary and Established Names
Optilite Freelite Kappa Free Kit
Optilite Freelite Lambda Free Kit
D Regulatory Information
| Product Code(s) | Classification | Regulation Section | Panel |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| DFH, DEH | Class II | 21 CFR 866.5550 - Immunoglobulin (Light Chain Specific) Immunological Test System | IM - Immunology |
## II Submission/Device Overview:
A Purpose for Submission:
Modification of a previously cleared device: Addition of intended use as an aid in the evaluation of Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance (MGUS) on Optilite Analyzer.
B Measurand:
Kappa (κ) Free Light Chain (FLC)
Lambda (λ) Free Light Chain (FLC)
C Type of Test:
Immunoturbidimetry; Quantitative
Food and Drug Administration
10903 New Hampshire Avenue
Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
www.fda.gov
{1}
K231290 - Page 2 of 9
## III Intended Use/Indications for Use:
### A Intended Use(s):
See Indications for Use below.
### B Indication(s) for Use:
The Optilite Freelite Kappa Free Kit is intended for the quantitative in vitro measurement of Kappa free light chains in serum using the Binding Site Optilite analyzer. Measurement of free light chains aids in the diagnosis and monitoring of multiple myeloma, lymphocytic neoplasms, Waldenström’s macroglobulinemia, AL amyloidosis, light chain deposition disease and connective tissue diseases such as systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), and aids in the evaluation of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS). Results of the free light chain measurements should always be interpreted in conjunction with other laboratory and clinical findings.
The Optilite Freelite Lambda Free Kit is intended for the quantitative in vitro measurement of Lambda free light chains in serum using the Binding Site Optilite analyzer. Measurement of free light chains aids in the diagnosis and monitoring of multiple myeloma, lymphocytic neoplasms, Waldenström’s macroglobulinemia, AL amyloidosis, light chain deposition disease and connective tissue diseases such as systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), and aids in the evaluation of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS). Results of the free light chain measurements should always be interpreted in conjunction with other laboratory and clinical findings.
### C Special Conditions for Use Statement(s):
Rx - For Prescription Use Only
**Optilite Freelite Kappa Free Kit**
**Warning:** The kappa free light chain results for a given specimen determined with assays from different manufacturers or on different systems can vary due to differences in assay methods and reagent specificity. The results reported by the laboratory to the physician must include the identity of the kappa free light chain assay used. Values obtained with different assays or systems cannot be used interchangeably. If, in the course of serially monitoring a patient, the assay or system used for determining kappa free light chain levels is changed, additional sequential testing should be carried out. Prior to changing assay or system, the laboratory MUST confirm baseline values for patients being serially monitored.
**Optilite Freelite Lambda Free Kit**
**Warning:** The lambda free light chain results for a given specimen determined with assays from different manufacturers or on different systems can vary due to differences in assay methods and reagent specificity. The results reported by the laboratory to the physician must include the identity of the lambda free light chain assay used. Values obtained with different assays or systems cannot be used interchangeably. If, in the course of serially monitoring a patient, the assay or system used for determining lambda free light chain levels is changed, additional sequential testing should be carried out. Prior to changing assay or system, the laboratory MUST confirm baseline values for patients being serially monitored.
{2}
K231290 - Page 3 of 9
# Optilite Freelite Kappa Free Kit and Optilite Freelite Lambda Free Kit
## Precaution:
### Evaluation of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS):
- The performance has not been sufficiently studied in Light Chain MGUS patients.
- Patients with renal disease or inflammation may have elevated levels of kappa and lambda free light chains (FLC).
- Sample populations excluded MGUS populations that were further diagnosed with a disease/disorder in subsequent testing with another medical device such as neoplasia, and infectious diseases including human immunodeficiency virus. Thus, the specificity of the test may be inflated.
- The performance has not been fully evaluated on all race/ethnicity in the intended use population.
## D Special Instrument Requirements:
Optilite Analyzer (K141100)
## IV Device/System Characteristics:
### A Device Description:
No modification is made to the kit components for the Optilite Freelite Kappa and Lambda Free Kits cleared in K150658. The assays are comprised of the following reagents:
- Latex Reagent: Consisting of polyclonal monospecific antibody coated onto polystyrene latex with preservatives, supplied in stabilized liquid form.
- Calibrator and Controls: Pooled human serum with preservatives, supplied in stabilized liquid form.
- Reaction Buffer: Containing 0.099% sodium azide as a preservative.
### B Principle of Operation:
No modification is made to the principle of operation for the Optilite Freelite Kappa and Lambda Free Kits cleared in K150658.
The concentration of the soluble antigen is assessed by turbidimetry. The test sample is added to a solution containing the appropriate antibody in a reaction cuvette. A beam of light is passed through the cuvette and is increasingly scattered by the formation of insoluble immune complexes. Light scatter is monitored by measuring the decrease in intensity of the incident beam of light. The antibody in the cuvette is in excess so the amount of immune complex formed is proportional to the antigen concentration. A series of calibrators of known antigen concentration are assayed to produce a calibration curve of measured light scatter versus antigen concentration. Samples of unknown antigen concentration can then be assayed, and the results read from the calibration curve.
{3}
V Substantial Equivalence Information:
A Predicate Device Name(s):
Freelite Human Kappa And Lambda Free Diagnostic Test Kits For Use On The Roche Cobas Integra 400/400 Plus Analyzer Kit
B Predicate 510(k) Number(s):
K070900
C Comparison with Predicate(s):
| Device & Predicate Device(s): | K231290 (Device) | K070900 (Predicate) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Device Trade Name | Optilite Freelite Kappa Free Kit
Optilite Freelit Lambda Free Kit | Freelite Human Kappa and Lambda Free Kits for use on Roche Cobas Integra 400/400 plus |
| General Device Characteristic Similarities | | |
| Assay Type | Quantitative | Same |
| Test Method | Turbidimetry | Same |
| Detection Antibody | Kappa: Polyclonal sheep anti-human Kappa antibody coated onto latex particles
Lambda: Polyclonal sheep anti-human Lambda antibody coated onto latex particles | Same |
| Reference Interval | Kappa: 3.30–19.40 mg/L
Lambda: 5.71–26.30 mg/L
Ratio: 0.26–1.65 mg/L | Same |
| Specimen Type | Serum | Same |
| Traceability | Internal reference material | Same |
| Measuring range (Kappa) | 0.6–25.3 mg/L (1+1)
2.9–127 mg/L (1+9)
29–1270 mg/L (1+99)
290–12700 mg/L (1+999)
1450 – 63500 mg/L (1+4999) | Same (First 4 dilutions only) |
| Measuring range (Lambda) | 1.3–34.7 mg/L (1+1)
5.2–139 mg/L (1+7)
52–1390 mg/L (1+79)
520–13900 mg/L (1+799)
5200–139000 mg/L (1+7999) | Same |
| Open-vial Stability | 3 months | Same |
K231290 - Page 4 of 9
{4}
K231290 - Page 5 of 9
| General Device Characteristic Differences | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Intended Use/Indications For Use | The Optilite Freelite Kappa Free Kit is intended for the quantitative in vitro measurement of Kappa free light chains in serum using the Binding Site Optilite analyser. Measurement of free light chains aids in the diagnosis and monitoring of multiple myeloma, lymphocytic neoplasms, Waldenström’s macroglobulinaemia, AL amyloidosis, light chain deposition disease and connective tissue diseases such as systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), and aids in the evaluation of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS). Results of the free light chain measurements should always be interpreted in conjunction with other laboratory and clinical findings. | Freelite Human Kappa Kit:
This kit is intended for the quantitation of kappa free light chains in serum on the Roche Cobas Integra 400, 400plus and 800. Measurement of free light chains aids in the diagnosis and monitoring of multiple myeloma, lymphocytic neoplasms, Waldenström’s macroglobulinaemia, AL amyloidosis, light chain deposition disease and connective tissue diseases such as systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), and aids in the evaluation of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS). Results of the free light chain measurements should always be interpreted in conjunction with other laboratory and clinical findings. |
| | The Optilite Freelite Lambda Free Kit is intended for the quantitative in vitro measurement of Lambda free light chains in serum using the Binding Site Optilite analyser. Measurement of free light chains aids in the diagnosis and monitoring of multiple myeloma, lymphocytic neoplasms, Waldenström’s macroglobulinaemia, AL amyloidosis, light chain deposition disease and connective tissue diseases such as systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), and aids in the evaluation of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS). Results of the free light chain measurements should always be interpreted in conjunction with other laboratory and clinical findings. | Freelite Human Lambda Kit:
This kit is intended for the quantitation of Lambda free light chains in serum on the Roche Cobas Integra 400 / 400plus and 800. Measurement of free light chains aids in the diagnosis and monitoring of multiple myeloma, lymphocytic neoplasms, Waldenström’s macroglobulinaemia, AL amyloidosis, light chain deposition disease and connective tissue diseases such as systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), and aids in the evaluation of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS). Results of the free light chain measurements should always be interpreted in conjunction with other laboratory and clinical findings. |
| On-board stability | 30 days | 3 months |
| Instrument | Optilite analyzer | Roche Cobas Integra |
| Measuring range (Kappa) | 1450–63500 mg/L (1+4999) | 2900–127000 mg/L (1+9999) |
{5}
VI Standards/Guidance Documents Referenced:
Not applicable
VII Performance Characteristics (if/when applicable):
A Analytical Performance:
1. Precision/Reproducibility:
See K150658
2. Linearity:
See K150658
3. Analytical Specificity/Interference:
See K150658
4. Assay Reportable Range:
See K150658
5. Traceability, Stability, Expected Values (Controls, Calibrators, or Methods):
See K150658
6. Detection Limit:
See K150658
7. Assay Cut-Off:
See expected values/reference range below.
B Comparison Studies:
1. Method Comparison with Predicate Device:
See K150658
2. Matrix Comparison:
Not applicable
K231290 - Page 6 of 9
{6}
K231290 - Page 7 of 9
# C Clinical Studies:
MGUS is a clinically asymptomatic premalignant clonal plasma cell or lymphoplasmacytic proliferative disorder. The performance of the Optilite Freelite Kappa and Lambda Free Kits as an aid in the evaluation of MGUS was investigated from the following retrospective clinical studies:
## Study 1:
A retrospective study was performed by testing a total of 234 samples from clinically confirmed MGUS patients (with IFE positivity) and a total of 140 samples from clinically defined non-MGUS patients with polyclonal immunostimulation (confirmed with SPEP/SIFE). Clinical diagnostic criteria and classification for MGUS and related plasma-cell disorders were, as practiced clinically, fulfilled, but were not limited to the criteria outlined by the 'International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG)' consensus. The result of the device was compared to the clinical diagnosis for each sample.
The cohort of 234 MGUS samples included 174 non-IgM MGUS, 24 IgM MGUS, 12 light chain (LC) MGUS and 24 Biclonal. All samples were tested for FLC kappa and lambda levels with the Optilite Freelite Kappa and Lambda Free kits on the Optilite Analyzer. FLC κ/λ ratios were also calculated for each sample. The test result for MGUS positive or negative were based on the following criteria:
- For Non-LC MGUS, the test was considered as "MGUS Positive" or "Abnormal" when abnormal FLC κ/λ ratio (outside reference interval, i.e., <0.26 or >1.65) with IFE positivity was determined.
- For LC MGUS, the test was considered as "MGUS Positive" when abnormal FLC κ/λ ratio (outside reference interval, i.e., <0.26 or >1.65) with elevated FLC kappa (>19.40 mg/L) or elevated FLC lambda FLC (>26.30 mg/L) was determined.
One hundred thirty-nine (139) out of 234 MGUS cases were tested positive by the Optilite Freelite Kappa Free Kit and Optilite Freelite Lambda Free Kit with a positive rate of 59.4% (95% CI: 53.0 – 65.5%). The distribution of the cohort and the positivity rate for each clinical type of MGUS are summarized in the following table:
| MGUS Type | N | n (n/N%) Freelite positive |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Non-IgM MGUS (all) | 174 | 101 (58.0%) |
| IgG κ | 74 | 52 (70.3%) |
| IgG λ | 62 | 24 (38.7%) |
| IgA κ | 21 | 16 (76.2%) |
| IgA λ | 15 | 9 (60.0%) |
| IgD κ | 0 | 0 (0%) |
| IgD λ | 0 | 0 (0%) |
| Other * | 2 | 0 (0%) |
| | | |
| IgM MGUS (all) | 24 | 10 (41.7%) |
| IgM κ | 19 | 9 (47.4%) |
| IgM λ | 5 | 1 (20.0%) |
{7}
| MGUS Type | N | n (n/N%) Freelite positive |
| --- | --- | --- |
| LC-MGUS (all) | 12 | 12 (100%) |
| κ | 8 | 8 (100%) |
| λ | 4 | 4 (100%) |
| | | |
| Biclonal | 24 | 16 (66.7%) |
| | | |
| TOTAL | 234 | 139 (59.4%) |
* λ band (not free light chain) with no obvious corresponding heavy chain. These samples have been categorized as non-IgM MGUS based on associated IFE and FLC results generated for these samples.
The 140 samples from patients with confirmed non-MGUS polyclonal stimulation (polyclonal hypergammaglobulinemia) were comprised of autoimmune diseases (27); diabetes (21); cardiovascular diseases (12); liver diseases (11); renal diseases (8); infection/inflammation (5); endocrine disorders (4); respiratory diseases (3); cancers (2); and other diseases/conditions (anemia, arthralgia, back pain, thigh pain, bone pain, elevated globulin levels, hypocalcemia, iron deficiency, joint pain, leg pain, low Hb, low sodium, malaise, morning stiffness, night sweats, neutrophilia, raised calculated globulin, raised CRP, rash and itch, recurrent UTIs, TATT- tired all the time, tiredness, weight loss) (47). Among 140 non-MGUS samples, 121 of these were determined as negative by the Optilite Freelite Kappa Free Kit and Optilite Freelite Lambda Free Kit, indicating a negative agreement of 86.4% (95% CI: 79.8–91.1%) in this sample cohort. The 19 false positive samples were from patients with the following disorders: diabetes (2); renal diseases (3); infection/inflammation (2); liver diseases (1); autoimmune diseases (6); endocrine disorders (1) and other diseases/conditions (4).
## Study 2:
Another retrospective study was performed by testing 45 subjects with clinically stable MGUS and four subjects with progressive clinical status converting from MGUS to multiple myeloma (MM). Among 45 MGUS stable subjects, 39 patients were diagnosed with non-IgM MGUS (20 IgG K, 14 IgG L, two IgA K, and three IgA L), and six patients with IgM MGUS (four IgM K and two IgM L). All four subjects with progressive disease status were initially diagnosed with non-IgM MGUS (one IgG K, and three IgG L).
At least four serial draws were collected from each patient and tested with the Optilite Freelite Kappa Free Kit and Optilite Freelite Lambda Free Kit. FLC κ/λ ratio was calculated for each blood draw sample. Since the MGUS has been identified as a precursor to malignant diseases (multiple myeloma or amyloidosis), but not as a disease which requires treatment, no defined criteria in how to interpret consecutive FLC results are available. Therefore, for device evaluation purposes only, the criteria for stable MGUS and progressive MGUS based on test results in this study is defined as follows:
- FLC stable: Stable MGUS defined as < 25% increase in the concentration of the involved FLC in two assessments taken at least 6 months +/- 2 months apart where possible. This analysis included MGUS patients with and without abnormal FLC κ/λ ratio.
- FLC progressive: Progressive MGUS defined as the FLC κ/λ ratio outside of the reference interval of 0.26–1.65, and an increase of ≥ 25% in the concentration of the
K231290 - Page 8 of 9
{8}
involved light chain at or preceding the diagnosis of MM, compared to a previous sample taken at least 6 months +/- 2 months where possible.
Forty-two (42) out of 45 clinically stable MGUS subjects except LC MGUS, were determined as stable by the test and two out of four clinically progressive subjects were determined as progressive by these tests.
## Limitations
- The performance has not been sufficiently studied in Light Chain (LC) MGUS patients – 12 LC MGUS patient samples were tested in Study 1, no LC MGUS patient samples were tested in Study 2.
- The performance has not been fully evaluated on all race/ethnicity in the intended use population.
- The study included time points of blood draws not indicative of clinical practice. The algorithm using only FLC has not been validated for progression of disease. Furthermore, a small sample size (4 patients) with only one specific subtype (i.e., IgG MGUS only) was used to study progression in Study 2. Risk mitigation strategies include that this test is not a stand-alone test for the evaluation of patients with MGUS and the test is to be utilized in conjunction with serum protein electrophoresis and immunofixation blood tests.
## D Clinical Cut-Off:
Not applicable
## E Expected Values/Reference Range:
See K150658
Kappa FLC reference range: 3.30–19.40 mg/L
Lambda FLC reference range: 5.71–26.30 mg/L
Kappa/Lambda Ratio reference Range: 0.26–1.65 mg/L
## VIII Proposed Labeling:
The labeling supports the finding of substantial equivalence for this device.
## IX Conclusion:
The submitted information in this premarket notification is complete and supports a substantial equivalence decision.
K231290 - Page 9 of 9
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.