SureFlex HD Steerable Sheath, VersaCross HD Steerable Sheath
K231227 · Baylis Medical Company, Inc. · DYB · Dec 20, 2023 · Cardiovascular
Device Facts
Record ID
K231227
Device Name
SureFlex HD Steerable Sheath, VersaCross HD Steerable Sheath
Applicant
Baylis Medical Company, Inc.
Product Code
DYB · Cardiovascular
Decision Date
Dec 20, 2023
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 870.1340
Device Class
Class 2
Indications for Use
The sheath is indicated for introducing various cardiovascular catheters to the heart, including the left side of the heart through the interatrial septum. The sheath curve can be visualized when used with impedance-based electroanatomical mapping systems.
Device Story
SureFlex HD and VersaCross HD Steerable Sheaths are single-use, sterile catheter introducers. System includes steerable sheath, transseptal dilator, and J-tip guidewire. Sheath features 8.5 Fr diameter, bi-directional deflection (180 degrees), and four equi-spaced electrodes for visualization. Used in sterile clinical environments by physicians during transseptal procedures. Sheath connects to impedance-based electroanatomical mapping (EAM) systems via accessory cable to enable real-time visualization of sheath curve. Physician manipulates handle to control tip deflection, facilitating catheter navigation to target cardiac anatomy. Device aids in transseptal puncture when used with compatible needles/wires. Benefits include improved navigation and visualization during complex electrophysiology procedures.
Clinical Evidence
No human clinical data provided. Evidence consists of bench testing (mechanical, electrical, physical, biocompatibility, sterilization, packaging) and a pre-clinical simulated-use animal study to validate user requirements and performance in a representative anatomical model.
Technological Characteristics
8.5 Fr steerable sheath (63/73 cm length) with platinum/iridium radiopaque tip and 4 shaft electrodes. Materials: HDPE dilator, stainless-steel/PTFE guidewire. Bi-directional deflection mechanism. Sterilization: Ethylene Oxide (EtO). Standards: ISO 11070, ISO 10993-1, ISO 11135, IEC 60601-1, ISO 80369-7.
Indications for Use
Indicated for patients requiring introduction of cardiovascular catheters to the heart, including the left side via the interatrial septum. No specific age or gender contraindications stated.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A catheter introducer is a sheath used to facilitate placing a catheter through the skin into a vein or artery.
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image contains the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The logo consists of two parts: the Department of Health & Human Services logo on the left and the FDA acronym along with the full name of the agency on the right. The FDA part of the logo is in blue, with the acronym in a square and the full name, "U.S. Food & Drug Administration," written out next to it.
December 20, 2023
Baylis Medical Company Inc. Shilpa Sharma Senior, Regulatory Affairs Specialist 5825 Explorer Dr. Mississauga, Ontario L4W 5P6 Canada
Re: K231227
Trade/Device Name: SureFlex HD Steerable Sheath, VersaCross HD Steerable Sheath Regulation Number: 21 CFR 870.1340 Regulation Name: Catheter introducer Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: DYB Dated: November 17, 2023 Received: November 20, 2023
Dear Shilpa Sharma:
We have reviewed your section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database available at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
{1}------------------------------------------------
Additional information about changes that may require a new premarket notification are provided in the FDA guidance documents entitled "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99812/download) and "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Software Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99785/download).
Your device is also subject to, among other requirements, the Quality System (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820), which includes, but is not limited to, 21 CFR 820.30. Design controls; 21 CFR 820.90. Nonconforming product; and 21 CFR 820.100, Corrective and preventive action. Please note that regardless of whether a change requires premarket review, the QS regulation requires device manufacturers to review and approve changes to device design and production (21 CFR 820.30 and 21 CFR 820.70) and document changes and approvals in the device master record (21 CFR 820.181).
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR Part 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reportingcombination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR Parts 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reportingmdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about mediation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advice-comprehensive-regulatoryassistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
Sara M.
Digitally signed by
Sara M. Royce -S
Date: 2023.12.20
for Royce -S
12:45:12 -05'00'
Aneesh Deoras Assistant Director Division of Cardiac Electrophysiology,
{2}------------------------------------------------
Diagnostic and Monitoring Devices Office of Cardiovascular Devices Office of Product Evaluation and Quality Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{3}------------------------------------------------
# Indications for Use
Form Approved: OMB No. 0910-0120 Expiration Date: 06/30/2023 See PRA Statement below.
Submission Number (if known)
K231227
Device Name
SureFlex HD Steerable Sheath, VersaCross HD Steerable Sheath
Indications for Use (Describe)
The sheath is indicated for introducing various cardiovascular catheters to the heart, including the left side of the heart through the interatrial septum.
The sheath curve can be visualized when used with impedance-based electroanatomical mapping systems.
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
> Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
#### CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
#### *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{4}------------------------------------------------
#### 12.0 510(K) SUMMARY - K231227
#### Submitter Information
| A. | Company Name: | Baylis Medical Company Inc. |
|----|----------------------|---------------------------------------|
| B. | Company Address: | 5825 Explorer Dr. |
| | | Mississauga, Ontario, L4W 5P6 |
| | | Canada |
| C. | Company Phone: | +1 (905) 602-4875 |
| D. | Company Facsimile: | +1 (905) 602-5671 |
| E. | Contact Person: | Shilpa Sharma |
| | | Senior, Regulatory Affairs Specialist |
| F. | Summary Prepared on: | 27-April-2023 |
### Device Identification
| A. Device Trade Name: | SureFlex HD Steerable Sheath,<br>VersaCross HD Steerable Sheath |
|-------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|
| B. Device Common Name: | Catheter Introducer |
| C. Classification Name: | Catheter Introducer (21 CFR 870.1340) |
| D. Product Code: | DYB |
| E. Review Panel: | Cardiovascular |
| F. Device Class: | Class II |
## Identification of Legally Marketed Device
- CARTO VIZIGO™ 8.5F Bi-Directional Guiding Sheath A. Predicate Device:
- B. Manufacturer: Biosense Webster Inc.
- K170997 C. 510(k)
- The Biosense Webster CARTO VIZIGO™ 8.5F Bi-Directional D. Indications for Use Guiding Sheath is indicated for introducing various cardiovascular catheters into the heart, including the left side of the heart through the interatrial septum. The sheath curve can be visualized when used with compatible CARTO® 3 EP Navigation Systems.
This 510(k) is also citing the legally marketed VersaCross and TorFlex Transseptal Dilators (K190688) as reference devices to support dimensional and material aspects of the subject device's transseptal dilator component (TFD-M and VCD). The transseptal dilator component
{5}------------------------------------------------
of the subject device is identical in all aspects to the legally marketed reference device, VersaCross and TorFlex Transseptal Dilator (K190688). Both reference and subject dilators are used with the corresponding steerable sheath and are intended for introducing various cardiovascular catheters to the heart, including the left side of the heart through the interatrial septum.
This 510(k) is also citing the legally marketed SureFlex Steerable Sheath (K122926) and EPstar Diagnostic Fixed Electrophysiology Lumen Catheter (K183632) as reference devices to support material aspects of the subject device's steerable sheath component (MSS and VMS).
### Indications for Use
The sheath is indicated for introducing various cardiovascular catheters to the heart, including the left side of the heart through the interatrial septum.
The sheath curve can be visualized when used with impedance-based electroanatomical mapping systems.
### Device Description
The Traditional 510(k) premarket notification includes two proposed subject device families:
- . The SureFlex Platform: SureFlex HD Steerable Sheath models
- . The VersaCross Platform: VersaCross HD Steerable Sheath models
The proposed SureFlex HD Steerable Sheath and VersaCross HD Steerable Sheath subject devices are non-pyrogenic, single use devices that are supplied sterile to the UD Steerable Sheath families are comprised of the following components that are packaged together:
- . One Steerable Sheath
- . One Transseptal Dilator
- . One J-tip Mechanical Guidewire
The SureFlex and VersaCross HD Steerable Sheaths are intended for introducing various cardiovascular catheters to the heart, including the left side of the heart through the interatrial septum. The sheath curve can be visualized when used with separately cleared impedancebased electroanatomical mapping (EAM) systems. The steerable sheath component used in conjunction with a compatible transseptal dilator can facilitate transseptal puncture using separately cleared compatible needle or wire-based puncture devices. The steerable sheath component is connected to the impedance-based EAM system via a compatible legally
{6}------------------------------------------------
marketed accessory cable. The subject device is used in a sterile environment where facilities are appropriately equipped and staffed to perform transseptal procedures.
The steerable sheath component is 8.5 Fr with a 63 cm or 73 cm useable length and is available in three curve options (small, medium, large). It is flexible and bi-directionally deflectable at the distal end (180 degrees clockwise and counterclockwise). The radiopaque tip (containing a platinum/iridium marker band) maximizes visualization of the sheath during manipulation. The sheath contains 4 electrodes equi-spaced along the shaft to enable shaft visualization. The sheath has two distal sideports and the proximal end includes a hemostasis valve and a 3-way stopcock to facilitate the injection or fluids. A silicone lubricant is applied to the outer surface of the shaft for smoother device manipulation. The sheath handle allows the user to control the deflection of the sheath tip through rotation of the knob in the direction of desired distal deflection.
The compatible dilator component is 8.5F with a 95cm usable length and is comprised of HDPE material with a tungsten radiopaque marker coil at the tip for visualization. The dilator has a tapered distal tip that provides support for the sheath. The compatible mechanical guidewire (0.032″ or 0.035″) component is J-tipped, 180 cm in length and is comprised of a stainless-steel core mandrel with a PTFE coating.
## Comparison of Technological Characteristics with Predicate Device
The proposed SureFlex and VersaCross HD Steerable Sheaths and predicate device CARTO VIZIGO™ 8.5F Bi-Directional Guiding Sheath (K170997) have identical intended use, fundamental scientific technology, sterility, environment, and principle of operation (including mechanism of action) as well as similar indications for use. Differences in technological characteristics (design, materials and packaging) between the subject and predicate device do not raise any new or different questions of safety and effectiveness. The results of verification and validation activities demonstrates substantial equivalence of the proposed SureFlex HD Steerable Sheath and VersaCross HD Steerable Sheath subject devices with the predicate device. Table 12.1 below shows technological comparison of the subject device with the predicate device.
Table 12.1 Comparison of Technological Characteristics of the Subject and Predicate Device
{7}------------------------------------------------
| Characteristic | Comparison<br>Results | Comments |
|-----------------------------------------|-----------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Intended Use | Identical | The intended use of the subject device is identical to the<br>predicate device. Both devices are used to introduce<br>catheters to the left side of the heart with shaft<br>visualization when used with a compatible mapping<br>system. |
| Indications for<br>Use | Similar | The indications for use of the subject device is similar to<br>that of the predicate device, with a difference in reference<br>to the compatible mapping systems. The subject device's<br>compatibility and ability to be visualized on impedance-<br>based EAM systems encompasses the predicate device's<br>compatible mapping system (CARTO navigation systems).<br>Appropriate validation testing has been completed to<br>demonstrate the subject device meets its user<br>requirements, ensures compatibility with accessory /<br>ancillary devices (for use with any impedance-based EAM<br>systems), and achieves its intended use. Differences in<br>indications for use do not raise new or different questions<br>of safety or effectiveness. |
| Fundamental<br>Scientific<br>Technology | Identical | Both subject and predicate device rely on user controlled<br>mechanical manipulation to percutaneously gain access to<br>vasculature and chambers of the heart, with shaft<br>visualization when used with a compatible mapping<br>system. |
| Operating<br>Principles | Identical | The principles of operation for both subject and predicate<br>device rely on the user to direct the device assembly to<br>the desired site to facilitate introduction of cardiovascular<br>catheters to the heart. |
| Mechanism of<br>Action | Identical | The mechanism of action for both subject and predicate<br>device include a steerable sheath with manual actuation<br>to provide steerability and to track to target anatomy,<br>while using an impedance-based electroanatomical<br>mapping system to support sheath visualization. |
| Characteristic | Comparison Results | Comments |
| Environment | Identical | Both subject and predicate device are used in a sterile environment where facilities are appropriately equipped and staffed to perform transseptal procedures. |
| Materials | Similar | Appropriate biocompatibility verification testing has been conducted for the subject device and results demonstrate the device meets biological safety requirements as per ISO 10993-1 and FDA guidance. Differences in material between the subject and predicate devices do no raise new or different questions of safety or effectiveness. |
| Technological Characteristics | Similar | The technological characteristics of the subject device are similar to that of the predicate device. Appropriate verification and validation testing have been conducted for the subject device and results demonstrate that the device meets its intended use and requirements of ISO 11070. Differences in dimensions and compatibility with accessory/ancillary devices do not raise new or different questions of safety or effectiveness. |
| Packaging | Similar | The packaging configuration of the subject device is similar to that of the predicate device. Appropriate packaging verification and validation testing have been conducted for the subject device and results demonstrate that the packaging provides adequate protection and maintains the sterile barrier. Differences in packaging material and configuration do no raise new or different questions of safety or effectiveness. |
| Sterilization | Identical | Both subject and predicate device are single use, ethylene oxide sterilized. |
{8}------------------------------------------------
## Performance Testing Summary
Performance testing was completed to demonstrate substantial equivalence of the subject device to the predicate device. All test requirements were met as specified by applicable standards and test protocols. The device was subjected to the following verification and validation activities:
{9}------------------------------------------------
### Mechanical Testing
Mechanical verification testing was conducted for the subject device to ensure compliance with the requirements of ISO 11070:2014/A1:2018 and Baylis Medical Company Inc. self-enforced requirements. The following mechanical tests were performed:
- . Hemostasis Valve Liquid Leakage
- Sheath Hub Assembly Air Leakage .
- . Sheath Liquid Leakage
- . Tip Stiffness
- Shaft Limit Load ●
- Electrode Shaft Pull .
- Steering Limit Load ●
- Handle Structure Limit Load .
- Shaft Stiffness .
- Curve Range ●
### Electrical Safety Testing
Electrical safety testing was conducted for the subject device to verify compliance with applicable requirements of IEC 60601-1:2005/A1:2012 and Baylis self-enforced requirements. The following general physical tests were performed:
- . Resistance and Insulation
- . Cable Compatibility
- . Air Clearances
- Electrical Safety Tests .
- Spillage Protection ●
- . Electrical Limit Load
#### General Physical Testing
General physical verification testing was conducted for the subject device to verify compliance with the applicable requirements of ISO 11070:2014/A1:2018, ISO 80369-7, ISO 594-1:1986, ISO 594-2:1998 and Baylis self-enforced requirements. The following general physical tests were performed:
- Particulate Test ●
- Corrosion Resistance ●
- Clinical Valve Catheter Manipulation .
{10}------------------------------------------------
- . Snap Force Test
- . Dilator Locking
- Dilator Compatibility and Protrusion .
- Dilator Bend to Unlock .
- Cap Pry Test ●
- . Cap Torque Test
- Valve Insertion Force .
- Tip Transition ●
- Operational Durability
- . Curve Retention
## Biocompatibility Verification
The subject device is categorized as an externally communicating device contacting circulating blood and indirect blood path for a limited duration up to a maximum of 24 hours. The biological safety of the subject device was verified in accordance with the requirements of ISO 10993-1:2020 and the FDA Guidance Document "Use of International Standard ISO 10993-1, "Biological evaluation of medical devices – Part 1: Evaluation and testing within a risk management process." The following biocompatibility endpoints were evaluated:
- . Cytotoxicity
- Sensitization ●
- Irritation or Intracutaneous Reactivity ●
- . Systemic Toxicity (Acute)
- Material-Mediated Pyrogenicity .
- Hemocompatibility ●
## Sterilization Verification
Sterilization verification for the subject device was completed in accordance with the requirements of ISO 11135:2014/A1:2019. Sterilization was performed using a validated Ethylene Oxide (EtO) process to a Sterility Assurance Level (SAL) of 10-6. Residual limits for the subject device are in accordance with ISO 10993-7:2008/A1:2022.
{11}------------------------------------------------
### Pyrogen Testing
The subject device is supplied non-pyrogenic. Limulus Amoebocyte Lysate (LAL) testing was evaluated using the Kinetic Chromogenic method, as per ANSI/AAMI ST72:2019 and the FDA Guidance Document, "Guidance for Industry – Pyrogens and Endotoxins Testing: Questions and Answers," to verify the subject device meets current FDA and USP pyrogen limit specifications.
## Packaging Verification
Packaging performance and stability testing was completed to verify the integrity of the subject device through the rigors of shipping and handling as well as storage over time. This testing was completed in accordance with ISO 11607-1:2020 (Parts 1 and 2) over the proposed intended shelf life of the subject device.
#### Pre-Clinical Validation Testing - Simulated Use Animal Study
Customer requirements / user needs were validated through simulated use animal validation study. Pre-clinical validation testing evaluated the subject device design and performance during normal clinical and intended use and was completed using an appropriate representative anatomical model.
#### Conclusion
The proposed SureFlex and VersaCross HD Steerable Sheaths and predicate device CARTO VIZIGO™ 8.5F Bi-Directional Guiding Sheath (K170997) have identical intended use, fundamental scientific technology, sterility, environment, and principle of operation (including mechanism of action) as well as similar indications for use. Differences in technological characteristics (design, materials and packaging) do not raise any new or different questions of safety and effectiveness. The results of verification and validation activities demonstrates substantial equivalence of the proposed SureFlex HD Steerable Sheath and VersaCross HD Steerable Sheath subject devices with the predicate device.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.