K231056 · Wallaby Medical · QJP · Mar 8, 2024 · Cardiovascular
Device Facts
Record ID
K231056
Device Name
Esperance Distal Access Catheter
Applicant
Wallaby Medical
Product Code
QJP · Cardiovascular
Decision Date
Mar 8, 2024
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 870.1250
Device Class
Class 2
Indications for Use
The Esperance Distal Access Catheter is indicated for the introduction of interventional devices into the peripheral and neuro vasculature.
Device Story
Single-use, single-lumen, variable-stiffness, composite catheter; 5F and 6F sizes; 115 cm and 131 cm lengths. Designed for navigation through tortuous anatomy; features semi-rigid proximal shaft transitioning to flexible distal shaft. Includes peelable introducer and shaping mandrel. Distal tip radiopaque; external hydrophilic coating reduces friction. Used in clinical settings by physicians for interventional procedures; facilitates delivery of interventional devices into peripheral and neuro vasculature. Non-active, surgically invasive device for short-term use.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical data. Substantial equivalence established via non-clinical bench testing, including visual/dimensional inspection, simulated use, delivery/retrieval forces, tip stiffness/shaping, tensile strength, torque strength, coating integrity/lubricity, burst/leak testing, kink resistance, particulate testing, corrosion resistance, radiopacity, and Luer hub testing per ISO 10555-1, ISO 80369-7, and ISO 80369-20.
{0}------------------------------------------------
March 8, 2024
Image /page/0/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The logo consists of two parts: the Department of Health & Human Services logo on the left and the FDA logo on the right. The FDA logo includes the letters "FDA" in a blue square, followed by the words "U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION" in blue text.
Wallaby Medical Emily Dobosz Senior Manager Regulatory Affairs 22901 Mill Creek Drive Laguna Hills, California 92653
Re: K231056
Trade/Device Name: Esperance Distal Access Catheter Regulation Number: 21 CFR 870.1250 Regulation Name: Percutaneous Catheter Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: QJP, DQY Dated: February 2, 2024 Received: February 5, 2024
Dear Emily Dobosz:
We have reviewed your section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database available at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Additional information about changes that may require a new premarket notification are provided in the FDA guidance documents entitled "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99812/download) and "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Software Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99785/download).
{1}------------------------------------------------
2
Your device is also subject to, among other requirements, the Quality System (OS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820), which includes, but is not limited to, 21 CFR 820.30, Design controls; 21 CFR 820.90, Nonconforming product; and 21 CFR 820.100, Corrective and preventive action. Please note that regardless of whether a change requires premarket review, the QS regulation requires device manufacturers to review and approve changes to device design and production (21 CFR 820.30 and 21 CFR 820.70) and document changes and approvals in the device master record (21 CFR 820.181).
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR Part 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reportingcombination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR Parts 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reportingmdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about mediation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advice-comprehensive-regulatoryassistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
# Naira Muradyan -S
Naira Muradyan, Ph.D. Assistant Director DHT5A: Division of Neurosurgical, Neurointerventional and Neurodiagnostic Devices OHT5: Office of Neurological and Physical Medicine Devices Office of Product Evaluation and Quality Center for Devices and Radiological Health
{2}------------------------------------------------
## Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K231056
Device Name Esperance Distal Access Catheter
Indications for Use (Describe)
The Esperance Distal Access Catheter is indicated for the introduction of interventional devices into the peripheral and neuro vasculature.
| Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable) |
|-------------------------------------------------|
|-------------------------------------------------|
X Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
| Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
## CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
#### *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/3/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo for Wallaby Medical. The logo consists of a green and blue gradient circle with a white abstract design inside, followed by the words "Wallaby Medical" in a sans-serif font. The colors of the text also have a green and blue gradient, matching the circle.
## 510(k) Summary (21 CFR 807.92)
## 510(k) Number: K231056
Date Prepared: March 06, 2024
510(k) Submitter:
Wallaby Medical 22901 Mill Creek Drive Laguna Hills, CA 92653
| Contact: | Emily Dobosz |
|----------|-----------------------------------|
| Title: | Senior Manager Regulatory Affairs |
| Phone: | +353 91 740 100 |
| Email: | emily.dobosz@wallabyphenox.com |
| Device Trade Name: | Esperance® Distal Access Catheter |
|-----------------------|-----------------------------------------|
| Common or Usual Name: | Catheter, Percutaneous, Neurovasculatur |
| Regulation Number: | 21 CFR 870.1250 |
| Regulation Name: | Percutaneous Catheter |
| Review Panel: | Neurology, Cardiovascular |
| Device Class: | Class II |
| Product Codes: | QJP, DQY |
## PREDICATE AND REFERENCE DEVICES
| Device Name | 510(k) Number |
|-------------------------------------------------|---------------|
| Predicate: React™71 Catheter | K182097 |
| Reference: Esperance Aspiration Catheter System | K211697 |
## DEVICE DESCRIPTION
The Esperance® Distal Access Catheter is a single-use, single lumen, variable stiffness, composite catheter. The device includes 5F and 6F catheters with inner diameters of 0.055" and 0.071", respectively, designed with three different working lengths for both sizes: 115 cm, and 131 cm. The device is supplied with a peelable introducer and shaping mandrel. The distal tip of each catheter is visible under fluoroscopy and the distal shaft of each catheter is designed with an external hydrophilic coating to reduce friction during use. The proximal end of each catheter incorporates a strain relief and a standard Luer adapter to facilitate the attachment of accessories. Each catheter has a semi-rigid proximal shaft which transitions into a flexible distal shaft to facilitate the advancement of the catheter in tortuous anatomy.
The Esperance® Distal Access Catheter is a non-active, surgically invasive device intended for short term use within the vasculature.
{4}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/4/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo for Wallaby Medical. The logo consists of a green and blue gradient circle with a white design inside, followed by the words "Wallaby Medical" in a green and blue gradient sans-serif font. The logo is simple and modern, and the colors are calming and professional.
## INDICATIONS FOR USE
The Esperance Distal Access Catheter is indicated for the introduction of interventional devices into the peripheral and neuro vasculature.
## COMPARISON OF TECHNOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS
| | Predicate Device | Subject Device | Reference Device |
|----------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Trade Name | React™ 71 Catheter | Esperance® Distal Access<br>Catheter | Esperance® Aspiration Catheter<br>System |
| 510(k) number | K182097 | K231056 | K211697 |
| Product<br>Classification | Class II | Class II | Class II |
| Regulation<br>Number | 21 CFR 870.1250 | 21 CFR 870.1250 | 21 CFR 870.1250 |
| Regulation<br>Name | Percutaneous Catheter | Catheter, Percutaneous,<br>Neurovasculature | Catheter, Thrombus Retriever |
| Product Code | DQY | QJP, DQY | NRY |
| Intended<br>Use/Indications<br>for Use | The React™ 71 Catheter is<br>indicated for the<br>introduction of<br>interventional devices into<br>the peripheral and neuro<br>vasculature. | The Esperance Distal Access<br>Catheter is indicated for the<br>introduction of interventional<br>devices into the peripheral<br>and neuro vasculature. | The Esperance Aspiration<br>Catheter with the Medela<br>Dominant Flex Surgical Suction<br>Pump and Wallaby Aspiration<br>Tubing set is intended for use in<br>the revascularization of<br>patients with acute ischemic<br>stroke secondary to intracranial<br>large vessel occlusive disease<br>(within internal carotid, middle<br>cerebral - M1 and M2<br>segments, basilar, and<br>vertebral arteries) within 8<br>hours of symptom onset.<br>Patients who are ineligible for<br>intravenous tissue plasminogen<br>activator (IV t-PA) or who fail IV<br>t-PA therapy are candidates<br>for treatment. |
| Accessories | Peelable Sheath | Peelable Sheath,<br>Shaping Mandrel | Peelable Sheath,<br>Shaping Mandrel |
| Dimensions | | | |
| Working<br>Length | 132 cm | 115 cm<br>125 cm<br>131 cm | 115 cm<br>125 cm<br>131 cm |
| Proximal Outer<br>Diameter (OD) | 0.0855 in (Max) | 5F: 0.069 in Max<br>6F: 0.084 in Max | 5F: 0.069 in Max<br>6F: 0.084 in Max |
| Distal OD | 0.0855 in (Max) | 5F: 0.065 in Max<br>6F: 0.084 in Max | 5F: 0.065 in Max<br>6F: 0.084 in Max |
| (ID) | | 6F: 0.070 in Min | 6F: 0.070 in Min |
| Materials | | | |
| Hub | Trogamid | Nylon | Nylon |
| Strain Relief | DynaFlex | Thermoplastic vulcanizate,<br>polypropylene | Thermoplastic vulcanizate,<br>polypropylene |
| Inner Layer | PTFE, Polyolefin | PTFE | PTFE |
| Reinforcement | Nitinol | Nitinol | Nitinol |
| Outer Jacket | Polyamide,<br>Polyolefin,<br>Polyurethane | Tecothane (polyurethane<br>elastomer), Pebax (polyether<br>block amide), Vestamid<br>(polyamide) | Tecothane (polyurethane<br>elastomer), Pebax (polyether<br>block amide),<br>Vestamid (polyamide) |
| Marker Band | Platinum/Iridium | Platinum/Iridium | Platinum/Iridium |
| Adhesive | Cyanoacrylate | Cyanoacrylate | Cyanoacrylate |
| Coating | Hydrophilic | Hydrophilic | Hydrophilic |
| Packaging<br>Configuration | Pouch, Packaging Card,<br>Packaging Hoop | Pouch, Packaging Card,<br>Packaging Hoop | Pouch, Packaging Card,<br>Packaging Hoop |
| Sterilization<br>Method | Ethylene Oxide | Ethylene Oxide | Ethylene Oxide |
| How<br>Supplied | Sterile, Single Use | Sterile, Single Use | Sterile, Single Use |
{5}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/5/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo for Wallaby Medical. The logo consists of a circular icon on the left and the text "Wallaby Medical" on the right. The icon is green and blue and appears to have a stylized image of a kangaroo. The text "Wallaby Medical" is also green and blue, with the color gradient changing from green to blue from left to right.
## BIOCOMPATIBILITY
Biocompatibility of the subject Esperance® Distal Access Catheter is supported by the previously conducted biocompatibility evaluation of the reference device, the Esperance Aspiration Catheter System (K211697), because there are no changes in the design, materials, and manufacturing of the subject Esperance® Distal Access Catheter and accessories versus the respective components of the reference device system.
## NON-CLINICAL PERFORMANCE DATA
Bench performance testing was conducted to support the subject Esperance® Distal Access Catheter submission. Because there are no changes in the design, materials, and manufacturing of the subject Esperance® Distal Access Catheter and accessories versus the respective components of the reference device, the Esperance Aspiration Catheter System (K211697), for tests marked with * in the table below performance data from the reference device were used in support of the subject device.
| Test | Description / Results |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Visual Inspection* | The device was evaluated to verify the visual inspection<br>requirements were met. The device met all pre-defined acceptance<br>criteria. |
| Dimensional Inspection* (ID, OD,<br>Overall Length, Working Length,<br>Coating Length, Distal Tip to<br>Marker Band, Hub/Strain Relief<br>Length) | The device was evaluated to verify the dimensional requirements<br>were met. The device met all pre-defined acceptance criteria. |
| Simulated Use | The device was evaluated in a simulated anatomy model for:<br>preparation/ease of assembly, introducer sheath interaction, |
| | introducer peel away, compatibility with guidewire/microcatheter,<br>lubricity and durability of hydrophilic coating, and kink resistance.<br>Testing of the reference device, Esperance Aspiration Catheter<br>System (K211697), was used and supplemented with additional<br>testing conducted to support the intended use of the subject<br>Esperance Distal Access Catheter. Device performs as intended and<br>met all pre-defined acceptance criteria under simulated use<br>conditions. |
| Physician Validation* | The device was evaluated in a simulated anatomy model by<br>physicians. Device performs as intended under simulated use<br>conditions. |
| Delivery and Retrieval Forces | The device was subjected to delivery and retrieval forces testing in a<br>vascular model under simulated use conditions and met all pre-<br>defined acceptance criteria. Testing of the reference device,<br>Esperance Aspiration Catheter System (K211697), was used and<br>supplemented with additional testing conducted to support the<br>intended use of the subject Esperance Distal Access Catheter. |
| Tip Stiffness* | The device tip was deflected on a universal testing machine and met<br>acceptance criteria. |
| Tip Shaping* | The device tip was shaped with the shaping mandrel and steam<br>and met the pre-defined acceptance criteria. |
| System Tensile* (Hub, Shaft, Tip) | The device was evaluated to verify the tensile strength of the full<br>system meets the minimum tensile requirement. The device met all<br>predefined acceptance criteria. |
| Elongation to Failure* | The device elongation was obtained from the shaft tensile testing<br>data. The device met all pre-defined acceptance criteria. |
| Torque Strength* | The device torque response was assessed in a vascular model and<br>met the predefined acceptance criteria. |
| Coating Integrity (after particulate<br>testing) | Testing of the reference device, Esperance Aspiration Catheter<br>System (K211697), was used and supplemented with additional<br>testing conducted to support the intended use of the subject<br>Esperance Distal Access Catheter. The device coating integrity was<br>inspected pre- and post-insertion and retrieval through a vascular<br>model and met all pre-defined acceptance criteria. |
| Coating Lubricity* | The device was evaluated for frictional forces on a universal testing<br>machine and met all pre-defined acceptance criteria. |
| Catheter Burst, Leak (Liquid and Air) | The device was evaluated to verify the device does not leak, burst,<br>and is compatible with accessories per ISO 10555-1 and met<br>acceptance criteria. Testing of the reference device, Esperance<br>Aspiration Catheter System (K211697) was used and supplemented<br>with additional testing conducted to support the intended use of<br>the subject Esperance Distal Access Catheter. |
| Kink Resistance* | The device was evaluated for resistance to kinking around bends<br>with clinically relevant radii and met acceptance criteria. |
| Particulate | The device was evaluated within a simulated anatomy model to<br>verify that any particulate generated is comparable to cleared<br>comparator devices. The device met acceptance criteria.<br>Testing of the reference device, Esperance Aspiration Catheter<br>System (K211697) was used and supplemented with additional<br>testing conducted to support the intended use of the subject<br>Esperance Distal Access Catheter. |
| Corrosion Resistance* | The catheter is corrosion resistant per ISO 10555-1. |
| Radiopacity* | The device was evaluated for marker band visibility under<br>fluoroscopy and met the pre-defined acceptance criteria. |
| Luer Hub Testing* | The device was evaluated per ISO 80369-7 and ISO 80369-20 and<br>met the pre-defined specifications. |
{6}------------------------------------------------
# @ Wallaby Medical
{7}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/7/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo for Wallaby Medical. The logo consists of a green circle with a white design inside, followed by the words "Wallaby Medical" in a gradient from green to blue. The text is in a sans-serif font and is slightly curved.
#### PERFORMANCE DATA - ANIMAL
Animal data were not deemed necessary as substantial equivalence was established based upon successful completion of non-clinical bench testing.
## PERFORMANCE DATA - CLINICAL
A clinical study was not deemed necessary as substantial equivalence was established based upon successful completion of non-clinical bench testing.
## CONCLUSION
The Esperance® Distal Access Catheter is substantially equivalent to the React™ 71 Catheter (K182097). The differences in technological characteristics do not raise new questions of safety or effectiveness.
Non-clinical testing supports a determination that the Esperance® Distal Access Catheter is substantially equivalent to the predicate device.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.