K230537 · Total Joint Othopedics, Inc. · JWH · May 19, 2023 · Orthopedic
Device Facts
Record ID
K230537
Device Name
Klassic Knee Revision System
Applicant
Total Joint Othopedics, Inc.
Product Code
JWH · Orthopedic
Decision Date
May 19, 2023
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 888.3560
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic
Indications for Use
The Klassic® Revision System is intended for prosthetic replacement in treatment of the following: - Patient conditions of non-inflammatory degenerative joint disease (NIDID): avascular necrosis and osteoarthritis - Patient conditions of inflammatory joint disease (IJD): rheumatoid arthritis - Patients with failed previous surgery where pain, deformity, or dysfunction persists - Correctable varus-valgus deformity and moderate flexion contracture - Revision of a previously failed knee arthroplasty - Patients who require a total knee replacement The Klassic® Revision System is indicated for cemented use only, except for the Klassic® Femur, with Cobalt 3D®, the Klassic® Tibial Baseplate with Ti-Coat® and the Universal Cones™ with Ti-Coat®, which are also indicated for cementless use.
Device Story
Klassic® Revision System is a line extension for the Klassic® Knee System used in total knee arthroplasty. Components include femoral stem extensions, stem adapters, femoral/tibial augments, and universal cones. Implants are constructed from Ti6Al4V and UHMWPE. Device is used by orthopedic surgeons in clinical settings to replace damaged or diseased knee joints. System provides structural support and articulation for the knee; augments and stems allow for bone loss management in revision scenarios. Benefits include restoration of joint function, pain relief, and correction of deformities. Output is a mechanical prosthetic construct implanted into the patient.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical data. Substantial equivalence demonstrated via bench testing and engineering analysis, including fatigue testing (ASTM F1820), post-fatigue disassembly torque, fretting corrosion analysis, augment fixation strength (set screw and cement), and porous coating characterization. Compliance with LAL testing for orthopedic implants confirmed.
Technological Characteristics
Materials: Ti6Al4V (ASTM F136), UHMWPE (ASTM F648), Ti-Coat (ASTM F67/F1580). Components: Femoral stem extensions, adapters, augments, and universal cones. Sterilization: Gamma radiation. Mechanical fixation via set screws or cement. No software or electronic components.
Indications for Use
Indicated for patients requiring total knee replacement or revision of failed knee arthroplasty due to non-inflammatory degenerative joint disease (avascular necrosis, osteoarthritis), inflammatory joint disease (rheumatoid arthritis), failed previous surgery with persistent pain/deformity/dysfunction, or correctable varus-valgus deformity and moderate flexion contracture.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A knee joint patellofemorotibial polymer/metal/polymer semi-constrained cemented prosthesis is a device intended to be implanted to replace a knee joint. The device limits translation and rotation in one or more planes via the geometry of its articulating surfaces. It has no linkage across-the-joint. This generic type of device includes prostheses that have a femoral component made of alloys, such as cobalt-chromium-molybdenum, and a tibial component or components and a retropatellar resurfacing component made of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene. This generic type of device is limited to those prostheses intended for use with bone cement (§ 888.3027).
{0}------------------------------------------------
May 19, 2023
Image /page/0/Picture/1 description: The image contains the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). On the left, there is a seal with the text "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES-USA" surrounding a graphic. To the right of the seal, there is a blue square with the letters "FDA" in white. Next to the blue square, the text "U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION" is written in blue.
Total Joint Othopedics, Inc. % Hollace Rhodes VP. Orthopedic Regulatory Affairs MCRA, LLC. 803 7th Street NW, Floor 3 Washington, District of Columbia 20001
Re: K230537
Trade/Device Name: Klassic® Revision System Regulation Number: 21 CFR 888.3560 Regulation Name: Knee Joint Patellofemorotibial Polymer Semi-Constrained Cemented Prosthesis Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: JWH, MBH, OIY Dated: March 20, 2023 Received: March 21, 2023
Dear Hollace Rhodes:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database located at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
{1}------------------------------------------------
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reportingcombination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reportingmdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about medical devices and radiation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advice-comprehensive-regulatoryassistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely.
Jesse Muir -S
Jesse Muir, PhD Acting Assistant Director DHT6A: Division of Joint Arthroplasty Devices OHT6: Office of Orthopedic Devices Office of Product Evaluation and Quality Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
## Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K230537
Device Name Klassic® Revision System
#### Indications for Use (Describe)
The Klassic® Revision System is intended for prosthetic replacement in treatment of the following:
- · Patient conditions of non-inflammatory degenerative joint disease (NIDID): avascular necrosis and osteoarthritis
- Patient conditions of inflammatory joint disease (IJD): rheumatoid arthritis
- · Patients with failed previous surgery where pain, deformity, or dysfunction persists
- · Correctable varus-valgus deformity and moderate flexion contracture
- · Revision of a previously failed knee arthroplasty
- · Patients who require a total knee replacement
The Klassic® Revision System is indicated for cemented use only, except for the Klassic® Femur, with Cobalt 3D®, the Klassic® Tibial Baseplate with Ti-Coat® and the Universal Cones™ with Ti-Coat®, which are also indicated for cementless use.
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)X Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
#### CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
#### *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
# 510(k) Summary
| 510(k) Number: | K230537 | |
|---------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|
| Manufacturer: | Total Joint Orthopedics, Inc.<br>1567 E. Stratford Avenue<br>Salt Lake City, UT 84106<br>Phone: 801.486.6070 | |
| Contact: | Mr. Chris Weaber<br>Director of Research and Development | |
| Prepared By: | MCRA, LLC<br>803 7th Street NW, Floor 3<br>Washington, DC 20001<br>Phone: 202.552.5800 | |
| Date Prepared: | March 20, 2023 | |
| Device Trade Name: | Klassic® Revision System | |
| Device Common Name: | Revision knee replacement system | |
| Classification: | 21 CFR 888.3560 Knee joint patellofemorotibial<br>polymer/metal/polymer semi-constrained cemented prosthesis | |
| | 21 CFR 888.3565 Knee joint patellofemorotibial<br>polymer/metal/polymer semi-constrained uncemented prosthesis | |
| | Class II | |
| Product Code: | IWH, MBH, OIY | |
## Indications for Use:
The Klassic® Knee System is intended for prosthetic replacement in treatment of the following:
- Patient conditions of non-inflammatory degenerative joint disease (NIDJD): avascular . necrosis and osteoarthritis
- Patient conditions of inflammatory joint disease (IJD): rheumatoid arthritis ●
- Patients with failed previous surgery where pain, deformity, or dysfunction persists ●
- Correctable varus-valgus deformity and moderate flexion contracture ●
- Revision of a previously failed knee arthroplasty ●
- Patients who require a total knee replacement .
{4}------------------------------------------------
The Klassic® Knee System is indicated for cemented use only, except for the Klassic® Femur, with Cobalt 3D®, the Klassic® Tibial Baseplate with Ti-Coat® and the Universal Cones™ with Ti-Coat®, which are also indicated for cementless use.
## Device Description:
The Klassic® Revision System is being introduced as a line extension for use with the Klassic® Knee System during total knee arthroplasty. The Klassic® Revision System includes the following implants and implant materials: Klassic® Stem Extension, Femoral, Cemented (Ti6Al4V), Klassic® Stem Adapter, Femoral (Ti6A14V), Klassic® Posterior Femoral Augment (Ti6A14V), Klassic® Distal Femoral Augment (Ti6Al4V), Klassic® Tibial Augment (Ti6Al4V, UHMWPE), Posterior Femoral Augment Set Screw (Ti6A14V), Distal Femoral Augment Set Screw (Ti6A14V), Universal Cone™ with Ti-Coat (Ti6A14V and unalloyed Ti powder).
## Predicate Devices:
The modified Klassic® System is substantially equivalent to the primary predicate Klassic® Knee System (K112906, K140942) with respect to design and indications for use. The modified Klassic® Knee System is also substantially equivalent to the Stryker Triathlon (K070095) with regards to material, function, and indications for use.
## Comparison of Technological Characteristics:
The modified Klassic® Knee System features the same materials (Ti6Al4V per ASTM F136 and UHMWPE per ASTM F648 and Ti-Coat per ASTM F67 or F1580), same use in primary or revision Total Knee Arthroplasty, and same gamma sterilization compared to the predicate Klassic® Knee System (K112906, K183596, K140942).
#### Discussion of Non-Clinical Testing/Performance Data:
The subject device underwent Knee Femur and Stem Extension construct fatigue testing, and postfatigue torque disassembly strength testing. In addition, engineering analyses were performed to evaluate the augment fixation strength via set screw fixation and cement fixation, fatigue strength of the Universal Cones, and also porous coating characterization. Additionally, the Klassic® Revision System is in compliance with LAL testing requirements for orthopedic implants.
Non-clinical testing and engineering analysis conducted to demonstrate substantial equivalence was as follows:
- Fatigue (based on ASTM F1820)
- Post Fatigue Disassembly Torque
- Fretting Corrosion Analysis (per Goldberg Criteria and Fricka, et al.) ●
- Femoral Augment Fixation via set screw fixation
- Tibial Augment Fixation via cement fixation
- . Porous Coating characterization per FDA Guidance document
- Universal Cone Fatigue Strength
## Conclusion:
Testing and engineering analyses showed that the subject components met the pre-determined acceptance criteria identified in the Bench Testing Summary, demonstrating that the subject
{5}------------------------------------------------
components perform as safe and effective compared to the predicate components, and is substantially equivalent to the predicate.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.